The authors 1 Kopp R.P. Liss M.A. Mehrazin R. et al. Analysis of renal functional outcomes after radical or partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥7 cm using the RENAL score. Urology. 2015; 86: 312-320 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar should be congratulated for this significant contribution to the partial nephrectomy (PN) literature. The present study was a retrospective analysis evaluating renal function outcomes after open PN compared with radial nephrectomy (RN) stratified by RENAL sum for renal masses >7 cm (T2RMs). As expected, the ΔeGFR was greater in RN (−19.7) vs PN (−11.9) and the de novo chronic kidney disease was significantly delayed in PN verses RN. Interestingly, they demonstrated equivalent renal function outcomes for PN and RN if RENAL score ≥10, whereas PN was associated with greater complication rates. To understand renal function after PN, baseline renal function, ischemic injury, amount of healthy tissue removed, and reconstructive injury (renorrhaphy) must all be considered. Cold and warm ischemia median times were 48 and 24 minutes, respectively, which appear to be in the acceptable ranges for T2RMs. Maximally preserving renal function would require small resection margins and atraumatic reconstruction techniques. Significant injury from cortical renorrhaphy can occur with even small renal masses. A recent study attributed a 12% loss in ipsilateral renal volume to cortical renorrhaphy on adjusted analysis. 2 Bahler C.D. Dube H.T. Flynn K.J. et al. Feasibility of omitting cortical renorrhaphy during robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched analysis. J Endourol. 2015; 29: 548-555 Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar Reconstructive injury is thought to be due to ligation of segmental vessels in addition to strangulated parenchyma, which has been shown to be worse with more central tumors (higher RENAL score). 3 Simmons M.N. Hillyer S.P. Lee B.H. et al. Nephrometry score is associated with volume loss and functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2012; 188: 39 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar Analysis of Renal Functional Outcomes After Radical or Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses ≥7 cm Using the RENAL ScoreUrologyVol. 86Issue 2PreviewTo determine if partial nephrectomy (PN) confers a renal functional benefit compared to radical nephrectomy (RN) for clinical T2 renal masses (T2RM) when adjusting for tumor complexity characterized by the RENAL nephrometry score. Full-Text PDF ReplyUrologyVol. 86Issue 2PreviewThe use of partial nephrectomy (PN) for larger masses has increased in recent years, primarily driven by the increasing experience with the procedure on the whole, emerging data suggesting oncologic equivalence to radical nephrectomy, and a growing awareness of the potential deleterious long-term consequences of nephron loss and chronic renal insufficiency.1 PN for larger masses is not without controversy, given increased risk of procedure-specific complications and doubts about the renal functional benefit of nephron-sparing surgery for larger masses. Full-Text PDF ErratumUrologyVol. 94PreviewIn the Editorial Comment by Thomas Allen Gardner, Clinton D. Bahler, and Paul T. Gellhaus to the August 2015 article “Analysis of Renal Functional Outcomes After Radical or Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses ≥7 cm Using the RENAL Score” (Urology 2015;85:319-320), the commenting editors regret that the commenting editor name Paul T. Gellhaus was misspelled. Full-Text PDF