The building sector is a major source of anthropogenic carbon emissions worldwide. While existing studies have extensively explored the socioeconomic and technological impacts on carbon emissions generated from building operations, few have assessed the effectiveness of low-carbon policies in curbing the increasing trend of building sector carbon emissions. This study examines the impacts of low-carbon policy intensity on building sector carbon emissions using a two-way fixed effects model on a 6-year panel (2015–2020) dataset for 286 cities in China. Our findings indicate that, on average, the aggregated intensity of low-carbon policies fails to pose any significant impacts on carbon emissions from building operations. This is partly due to the variations in different types of policy. Specifically, a 10% increase in the intensity of energy conservation policy results in a 0.05% decrease in carbon emissions, whereas capacity utilization policies are associated with an increase in building-operation carbon emissions. Moreover, these policy–emission relationships vary across building types and end-use sources. In particular, energy conservation policies are negatively associated with emissions from cooking and heating, but positively related to emissions generated from appliances and cooling. In comparison, capacity utilization policies tend to encourage additional emissions from most sources. This study highlights the partial effectiveness of energy conservation policies in curbing building sector carbon emissions and underscores the need for additional efforts in tackling the rebound effects to realize building sector decarbonization.
Read full abstract