You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP26-18 HOLMIUM VERSUS TRILOGY IN KIDNEY STONES GUY´S 1-2 (TRIHOLMIUM) PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS Braulio Manzo, Edgard Lozada, Pompeyo Alarcon, Edson Flores, Juan Galvan, Yonathan Gomez, Jonathan Jimenez, and Allan Casale Braulio ManzoBraulio Manzo More articles by this author , Edgard LozadaEdgard Lozada More articles by this author , Pompeyo AlarconPompeyo Alarcon More articles by this author , Edson FloresEdson Flores More articles by this author , Juan GalvanJuan Galvan More articles by this author , Yonathan GomezYonathan Gomez More articles by this author , Jonathan JimenezJonathan Jimenez More articles by this author , and Allan CasaleAllan Casale More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003254.18AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The desire to reduce complications related to percutaneous access and morbidity related to tract size has led researchers to evaluate PCNL using smaller-caliber instruments. In this context, mini-PCNL has emerged. Furthermore, its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated at the cost of a lower stone-free rate. Currently, mini-PCNL has been performed with High power laser lithotripsy; therefore, it is convenient to make a comparison between the results of lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser energy and the new LithoClast Trilogy EMS; and thereby determine which is the most effective method in the resolution of kidney stones through a miniaturized percutaneous tract. METHODS: A total of 116 patients will be subjected to simple randomization with a table of random numbers; 58 patients will undergo a mini-PCNL with Trilogy EMS probe 1.5 mm (Group1), and the remaining will undergo mini-PCNL with 100 W laser lithotripsy (group 2). Comparing both groups will be made by evaluating lithotripsy rate, stone-free status, operation time, and complications. RESULTS: We present the preliminary results of 32 randomized patients (18 in group 1 and 14 in group 2). Demographic data were homogeneous between both groups, including age, the side affected, BMI, maximum stone diameter, and stone volume (p values: 0.362, 0.221, 0.441, 0.569, and 0.120, respectively). Total fluoroscopy screening time was 24.3 and 26.4 seconds for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p: 0.547). Endoscopic stone-free status at the end of the surgical procedure was not statistically different in both groups (p: 0.394). Lithotripsy rate (195.09 sd 82.9 group 1 vs 202.7 sd: 99.38 for group 2) and operative time (94.28 sd: 34 for group1 vs 81.2 sd: 28.8 for group 2) were not statistically different in both groups (p: 0.815 and p: 0.268, respectively). The overall mean stone-free rate was 78.9 % (80.9% and 76.9%, respectively, with a p-value: of 0.371). The complications rate was similar in both groups (5.6 vs. 7.1% for groups 1 and 2, respectively, with a p-value: of 0.854). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data show that mini-PCNL with Trilogy lithotripsy (1.5 mm probe) shows similar results and efficacy to the current energy to perform mini-PCNL (high power holmium laser) by means of stone-free rate, lithotripsy rate, operative time, and complications rate. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e360 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Braulio Manzo More articles by this author Edgard Lozada More articles by this author Pompeyo Alarcon More articles by this author Edson Flores More articles by this author Juan Galvan More articles by this author Yonathan Gomez More articles by this author Jonathan Jimenez More articles by this author Allan Casale More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract