Secondary Syringe Exchange Research Articles

Social networks, secondary syringe exchange, and opioid agonist therapy retention among people who inject drugs in Hartford, CT

BackgroundOpioid agonist therapies (OAT) and harm reduction such as syringe service programs (SSP) have been shown to be effective in preventing adverse outcomes such as overdose deaths, HIV and Hepatitis C infections among people who inject drugs (PWID). The importance of social network influence on disease transmission is well established, yet the interplay between harm reduction and network structures is, generally, not well understood. This study aims to analyze how social networks can mediate the harm reduction effects associated with secondary exchange through syringe service programs (SSP) and opioid agonist therapies (OAT) among injection network members. MethodsSociometric data on networks on people who inject drugs from Hartford, CT, which were collected in 2012–2013, provided assessment of risk behaviors among 1574 injection network members, including participation in OAT and SSP. Subject's network characteristics were examined in relation to retention in OAT, as well as secondary syringe exchange using exponential random graph model (ERGM) and regression. ResultsBased on the analysis, we found that probability of individuals being retained in OAT was positively associated with the OAT retention status of their peers within the network. Using simulations, we found that higher levels of positive correlation of OAT retention among network members can result in reduced risk of transmission of HIV to network partners on OAT. In addition, we found that secondary syringe exchange engagement was associated with higher probability of sharing of paraphernalia and unsterile needles at the network level. ConclusionsUnderstanding how networks mediate risk behaviors is crucial for making progress toward ending the HIV epidemic.

Kerr and Wood Respond

We thank Drach et al. for their interest in our study and for sharing evidence from their intervention study focused on secondary syringe exchange. Consistent with the findings of their study is a large and growing body of evidence pointing to the important role injection drug users can play in enhancing HIV prevention efforts among their peers. Fairly early on in the HIV epidemic, studies from Europe and the United States demonstrated that involving drug users in the delivery of HIV prevention efforts, including syringe exchange programs (SEPs), could help extend the reach, coverage, and effectiveness of these programs.1–3 These findings were likely, in part, a reflection of the fact that too many injection drug users remained marginalized and did not have access to conventional public health programs. The peer-to-peer model of using drug users as peer educators appears to address this barrier by providing a service that is more acceptable to drug users than professional-led programs.4 In our recent study,5 an important aspect of the change in syringe distribution policy that led to large declines in syringe borrowing and lending was the creation of peer-driven SEPs. Recently, we have evaluated both the mobile and fixed syringe distribution activities of a local drug user organization—the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU). An examination of the fixed exchange showed that the drug user–led program was attracting a population of injectors who possessed several markers of heightened vulnerability to HIV infection.6 Surprisingly, despite being frequent injectors, the population using the VANDU fixed exchange was also less likely to report unsafe syringe disposal. More recently, we evaluated the VANDU outreach-based syringe distribution program and found similar results.7 This program was reaching high-risk injectors while helping to reduce syringe reuse. Drach et al. are correct in pointing out that transforming US syringe exchange programs will require changes in political acceptance. Given the evidence concerning the important role that drug users can play in enhancing SEP delivery, a part of this political change must be growing acceptance that this population can and will work effectively to support prevention efforts if given the opportunity.

Prevalence and predictors of transitions to and away from syringe exchange use over time in 3 US cities with varied syringe dispensing policies

Syringe exchange programs (SEPs) can reduce HIV risk among injecting drug users (IDUs) but their use may depend heavily on contextual factors such as local syringe policies. The frequency and predictors of transitioning over time to and from direct, indirect, and non-use of SEPs are unknown. We sought, over one year, to: (1) quantify and characterize transition probabilities of SEP attendance typologies; (2) identify factors associated with (a) change in typology, and (b) becoming and maintaining Direct SEP use; and (3) quantify and characterize transition probabilities of SEP attendance before and after changes in policy designed to increase access. Using data collected from 583 IDUs participating in a three-city cohort study of SEPs, we conducted a latent transition analysis and multinomial regressions. Three typologies were detected: Direct SEP users, Indirect SEP users and Isolated IDUs. Transitions to Direct SEP use were most prevalent. Factors associated with becoming or maintaining Direct SEP use were female sex, Latino ethnicity, fewer injections per syringe, homelessness, recruitment city, injecting speedballs (cocaine and heroin), and police contact involving drug paraphernalia possession. Similar factors influenced transitions in the syringe policy change analysis. Policy change cities experienced an increase in Indirect SEP users (43–51%) with little increased direct use (29–31%). We found that, over time, IDUs tended to become Direct SEP users. Policies improving syringe availability influenced SEP use by increasing secondary syringe exchange. Interactions with police around drug paraphernalia may encourage SEP use for some IDUs and may provide opportunities for other health interventions.

Social Network-Related Risk Factors for Bloodborne Virus Infections Among Injection Drug Users Receiving Syringes through Secondary Exchange

Secondary syringe exchange (SSE) refers to the exchange of sterile syringes between injection drug users (IDUs). To date there has been limited examination of SSE in relation to the social networks of IDUs. This study aimed to identify characteristics of drug injecting networks associated with the receipt of syringes through SSE. Active IDUs were recruited from syringe exchange and methadone treatment programs in Montreal, Canada, between April 2004 and January 2005. Information on each participant and on their drug-injecting networks was elicited using a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Subjects' network characteristics were examined in relation to SSE using regression models with generalized estimating equations. Of 218 participants, 126 were SSE recipients with 186 IDUs in their injecting networks. The 92 non-recipients reported 188 network IDUs. Networks of SSE recipients and non-recipients were similar with regard to network size and demographics of network members. In multivariate analyses adjusted for age and gender, SSE recipients were more likely than non-recipients to self-report being HIV-positive (OR=3.56 [1.54-8.23]); require or provide help with injecting (OR=3.74 [2.01-6.95]); have a social network member who is a sexual partner (OR=1.90 [1.11-3.24]), who currently attends a syringe exchange or methadone program (OR=2.33 [1.16-4.70]), injects daily (OR=1.77 [1.11-2.84]), and shares syringes with the subject (OR=2.24 [1.13-4.46]). SSE is associated with several injection-related risk factors that could be used to help focus public health interventions for risk reduction. Since SSE offers an opportunity for the dissemination of important prevention messages, SSE-based networks should be used to improve public health interventions. This approach can optimize the benefits of SSE while minimizing the potential risks associated with the practice of secondary exchange.

Secondary Syringe Exchange Among Users of 23 California Syringe Exchange Programs

This article describes the secondary syringe exchange (SSE) practices of injection drug users (IDUs) attending 23 syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in the state of California during 2002 (n = 539). The sample was primarily heroin injecting, about two thirds male, half White and half other racial/ethnic groups. Participants were interviewed with a structured questionnaire that included items on sociodemographic factors, drug use practices, sexual practices, use of SEP and other social services, and satisfaction with SEP services. Interviews lasted about 30 minutes. SSE was highly prevalent: 75% of IDUs reported participating in SSE in the 6 months before interview. Program characteristics, such as legal status, SSE policy, and exchange policy, did not affect the prevalence of SSE among SEP clients. Infectious disease risk behaviors were significantly more common among SSE participants than nonparticipants. SSE participants were more likely to share syringes (p <. 001) and cookers (p <. 001) in the previous 6 months. SSE was significantly associated with being stuck with another person's syringe (needle-stick), a little-discussed “occupational hazard” of this practice. In multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio of needle-stick among SSE participants was 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.3, 6.0). The high prevalence of SSE and the infectious disease risk associated with it warrant additional research to determine the causality of these associations. In the interim, SEPs should consider reinforcing HIV prevention education messages and training IDUs who engage in SSE in safe handling of biohazardous materials.

Secondary Syringe Exchange as a Model for HIV Prevention Programs in the Russian Federation

Effective prevention of syringe-borne transmission of HIV and the hepatitis viruses can be undermined if contact between injection drug users and the staff of prevention programs is impeded by police harassment, limited program resources, and the absence of an open “drug scene.” All these are commonplace in the Russian Federation. In response, “Project Renewal,” the harm reduction program of the AIDS Prevention and Control Center of the Tatarstan Ministry of Health in Kazan, has created a hybrid syringe exchange program that as its primary focus recruited and trained volunteers to provide secondary syringe exchange. To compensate for operational barriers, the program staff identified private venues and trained responsible individuals to work through their own and related networks of injectors to provide clean syringes, other harm reduction supplies, and educational materials, while facilitating the collection and removal of used and potentially contaminated syringes. Program staff developed a detailed set of tracking instruments to monitor, on a daily and weekly basis, the locations and types of contacts and the dissemination of trainings and materials to ensure that the secondary distribution network reaches its target audience. Data show that these secondary exchange sites have proven more productive than the primary mobile and fixed-site syringe exchanges in Kazan. Beginning in 2001, Project Renewal has trained other harm reduction programs in the Russian Federation to use this model of reaching injectors, identifying and training volunteers, and monitoring results of secondary syringe exchange.

Needle Syringe Acquisition and HIV Prevention Among Injecting Drug Users: A Treatise on the “Good” and “Not So Good” Public Health Practices in South Asia

This article describes the prevalence of HIV/AIDS and other bloodborne infections is well established among injection drug user (IDU) populations in South Asia (SA). IDU populations in SA are diverse and display different demographic and socioeconomic profiles. The current provision of sterile injecting equipment as part of public health initiatives is suboptimal. Although some needle and syringe exchange programs (NSEPs) operate in the region, pharmacies and “friends” continue to be a major source of syringe acquisition. It is suggested that the cost of syringes in the region is significantly higher in real terms than in several other countries and negatively impacts on the ability of IDUs to acquire needles and syringes. In addition, existing NSEPs offer poor coverage both at the population and individual level. Their effective functioning is hampered by resource constraints, ambivalent policy positions, little attention to quality, and environmental factors. Secondary syringe exchange is a nascent phenomenon in SA that needs to be adequately documented and evaluated. Urgent attention needs to be given to developing alternative models of needle syringe delivery to scale-up HIV prevention interventions for IDUs. This study was conducted in the first quarter of 2004 and updated in 2006. We used key informants, previously unpublished and published data from research studies, and interventions programs, service statistics, and primary data to inform this study.

The Health Benefits of Secondary Syringe Exchange

From a process evaluation, participants in San Francisco's syringe exchange program (SEP) are described. Three groups, primary, secondary, and nonexchangers, were interviewed for a total of 244 study participants recruited from eight needle exchange sessions. Fifty percent of all primary exchangers exchanged for one or more injecting drug user(s) (IDUs). Three general routes of syringe distribution were identified between primary and secondary exchangers: between close friends and lovers; for people who lived in close proximity to them; and with customers who bought drugs from them. Focusing on why some go to SEPs and why some rely on others to go for them, findings are summarized primarily as the barriers for not attending SEPs, including exposure, legal status, illness, drug lifestyle, and conflicts with service provision. The secondary exchangers had similar risk reduction profiles to the SEP users that overall were better than the nonexchangers. For example, they shared syringes and cookers significantly fewer times than nonexchangers. The results demonstrate that these client-provided exchanges enable the SEP to overcome injection drug users' obstacles to program attendance, thereby reaching even hard to access members of IDU populations. We found the effects of these client-provided services to be positive for the larger IDU population.

Sexual relationships, secondary syringe exchange, and gender differences in HIV risk among drug injectors.

Injection drug use continues to place women at risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through both risky injecting practices and risky sexual behavior with male injection drug users (IDUs). Although attendance at syringe-exchange programs (SEPs) is protective against HIV, a recent study found that women attending SEPs who exchanged syringes for other people (secondary exchange) were at greater risk for HIV seroconversion, potentially through risky sexual behavior. We examined this question in a sample of 531 IDUs (175 women and 356 men) attending 23 SEPs in California in 2001. Findings indicated that women were more likely than men to engage in secondary exchange and were more likely to have IDU sexual partners. In multivariate analysis among women, secondary exchange was independently associated with distributive syringe sharing, not engaging in receptive sharing, and not exchanging sex for money or drugs. Multivariate analysis among men found that having an IDU sexual partner was associated with secondary exchange. Women's sexual risk behavior was not associated with secondary exchange, and although women's secondary exchange was associated with individual protection for injection-related behaviors, it may increase network risk. More information on network members is needed to understand gender differences in secondary exchange.

A matter of convenience: factors influencing secondary syringe exchange in Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Distribution of sterile syringes to reduce the circulation of HIV-infection among injection drug user (IDU) communities is vital in curbing the spread of HIV among IDUs. In addition to other methods of distribution, syringe exchange programmes (SEPs) have been shown to be necessary in the dissemination of sterile syringes. Secondary syringe exchange (SSE) is an organic process by which IDUs distribute syringes to other IDUs and is an important complement to SEPs. This paper examines the motivations for people who provide SSE to other IDUs and the reasons why some IDUs do not use the Baltimore Needle Exchange Program (BNEP). Approximately 5000 individuals had obtained clean syringes from the BNEP between 1994 and 1997. In 1997, qualitative interviews were conducted in Baltimore with 20 providers of SSE and 10 SSE recipients who had never used the BNEP. Data from qualitative interviews were transcribed, coded and compiled. SSE providers reported economic gain and altruism as incentives. SSE recipients reported privacy, convenience of location and time, force of habit, and concern for carrying paraphernalia around as reasons influencing them to obtain syringes from secondary syringe exchangers rather than the needle exchange programme. Results from this study illuminate the social context in which SSE occurs and indicate the importance of SSE as a method for distributing sterile syringes.

Investigation of a Secondary Syringe Exchange Program for Homeless Young Adult Injection Drug Users in San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

Investigation of a Secondary Syringe Exchange Program for Homeless Young Adult Injection Drug Users in San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

National Trends in Condom Use Among At-Risk Heterosexuals in the United States

This study investigated an HIV prevention program for homeless young adult injection drug users (IDUs) that combined a secondary syringe exchange program (SEP) with community-level activities. Homeless young IDUs were recruited from street-based settings in San Francisco, and a structured questionnaire was administered. The secondary SEP operated in a circumscribed geographic area, and for analytic purposes respondents were assigned to the intervention site group if they primarily spent time in this area (n = 67), or the comparison site group if they primarily spent time elsewhere (n = 55). Almost all (96%) intervention site youth had used the secondary SEP in the past 30 days and were significantly more likely to regularly use SEP. In bivariate analysis, comparison site IDUs were more likely to share syringes, reuse syringes, share the cotton used to filter drugs, and use condoms with casual sex partners only inconsistently. In multivariate analysis, comparison site remained positively associated with sharing syringes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.748; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.406-9.988), reusing syringes (AOR, 2.769; 95% CI, 1.120-6.847), and inconsistent condom use with casual sex partners (AOR, 4.825; 95% CI, 1.392- 16.721). This suggests that the intervention was effective in delivering SEP services to homeless young adult IDUs, and that IDUs who frequented the intervention site had a lower HIV risk than comparison group IDUs.

Investigation of a secondary syringe exchange program for homeless young adult injection drug users in San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

This study investigated an HIV prevention program for homeless young adult injection drug users (IDUs) that combined a secondary syringe exchange program (SEP) with community-level activities. Homeless young IDUs were recruited from street-based settings in San Francisco, and a structured questionnaire was administered. The secondary SEP operated in a circumscribed geographic area, and for analytic purposes respondents were assigned to the intervention site group if they primarily spent time in this area (n = 67), or the comparison site group if they primarily spent time elsewhere (n = 55). Almost all (96%) intervention site youth had used the secondary SEP in the past 30 days and were significantly more likely to regularly use SEP. In bivariate analysis, comparison site IDUs were more likely to share syringes, reuse syringes, share the cotton used to filter drugs, and use condoms with casual sex partners only inconsistently. In multivariate analysis, comparison site remained positively associated with sharing syringes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.748; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.406-9.988), reusing syringes (AOR, 2.769; 95% CI,1.120-6.847), and inconsistent condom use with casual sex partners (AOR, 4.825; 95% CI, 1.392- 16.721). This suggests that the intervention was effective in delivering SEP services to homeless young adult IDUs, and that IDUs who frequented the intervention site had a lower HIV risk than comparison group IDUs.