Secondary Prevention In Patients Research Articles

Evaluation of Aspirin Prescribing and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults 60 Years of Age and Older in a Large, Academic Health System.

Background National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. Objective The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. Setting Large, academic health system within Colorado. Patients Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusion This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.

Trends in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy of Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients Noneligible for POINT/CHANCE Trial Treatment.

Recent clinical trials established the benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (DAPT-AC) in early-presenting patients with minor ischemic stroke. However, the impact of these trials over time on the use and outcomes of DAPT-AC among the patients with nonminor or late-presenting stroke who do not meet the eligibility criteria of these trials has not been delineated. In a multicenter stroke registry, this study examined yearly changes from April 2008 to August 2022 in DAPT-AC use for stroke patients ineligible for CHANCE/POINT (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events/Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke) clinical trials due to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >4 or late arrival beyond 24 hours of onset. A total of 32 118 patients (age, 68.1±13.1 years; male, 58.5%) with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 4 (interquartile range, 1-7) were analyzed. In 2008, DAPT-AC was used in 33.0%, other antiplatelets in 62.7%, and no antiplatelet in 4.3%. The frequency of DAPT-AC was relatively unchanged through 2013, when the CHANCE trial was published, and then increased steadily, reaching 78% in 2022, while other antiplatelets decreased to 17.8% in 2022 (Ptrend<0.001). From 2011 to 2022, clinical outcomes nonsignificantly improved, with an average relative risk reduction of 2%/y for the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, both among patients treated with DAPT-AC and patients treated with other antiplatelets. Use of DAPT-AC in stroke patients with stroke ineligible for recent DAPT clinical trials increased markedly and steadily after CHANCE publication in 2013, reaching deployment in nearly 4 of every 5 patients by 2022. The secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke seems to be gradually improving, possibly due to the enhancement of risk factor control.

Impact of Direct Measurement of Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol for Long-Term Secondary Prevention in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

This study investigated whether directly measured small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (D-sdLDL-C) can predict long-term coronary artery disease (CAD) events compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (apoB), and estimated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (E-sdLDL-C) determined by the Sampson equation in patients with stable CAD. D-sdLDL-C measured at Showa University between 2010 and 2022, and E-sdLDL-C were evaluated in 790 male and 244 female patients with stable CAD. CAD events, defined as sudden cardiac death, onset of acute coronary syndrome, and/or need for coronary revascularization, were monitored for 12 years. Cutoff lipid levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. CAD events were observed in 238 male and 67 female patients. The Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves showed that patients with D-sdLDL-C ≥32.1 mg/dL (0.83 mmol/L) had an increased risk for CAD events (P = 0.007), whereas risk in patients with E-sdLDL-C ≥36.2 mg/dL (0.94 mmol/L) was not increased. In the group with high D-sdLDL-C, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.15-1.89), and it remained significant after adjustment for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, or apoB and in patients treated with statins. HRs for high LDL-C, non-HDL-C, or apoB were not statistically significant after adjustment for high D-sdLDL-C. Higher D-sdLDL-C was associated with enhanced risk of high LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB (HR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.37). Higher D-sdLDL-C can predict long-term recurrence of CAD in stable CAD patients independently of apoB and non-HDL-C. D-sdLDL-C is an independent risk enhancer for secondary CAD prevention, whereas E-sdLDL-C is not. UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial Number: UMIN000027504.

Baseline characteristics, reperfusion treatment secondary prevention and outcome after acute ischemic stroke in three different socioeconomic environments in Europe.

The differences in vascular risk factors' and stroke burden across Europe are notable, however there is limited understanding of the influence of socioeconomic environment on the quality of secondary prevention and outcome after acute ischemic stroke. In this observational multicenter cohort study, we analyzed baseline characteristics, reperfusion treatment, outcome and secondary prevention in patients with acute ischemic stroke from three tertiary-care teaching hospitals with similar service population size in different socioeconomic environments: Bern/CH/n = 293 (high-income), Gdansk/PL/n = 140 (high-income), and Lutsk/UA/n = 188 (lower-middle-income). We analyzed 621 patients (43.2% women, median age = 71.4 years), admitted between 07 and 12/2019. Significant differences were observed in median BMI (CH = 26/PL = 27.7/UA = 27.8), stroke severity [(median NIHSS CH = 4(0-40)/PL = 11(0-33)/UA = 7(1-30)], initial neuroimaging (CT:CH = 21.6%/PL = 50.7%/UA = 71.3%), conservative treatment (CH = 34.1%/PL = 38.6%/UA = 95.2%) (each p < 0.001), in arterial hypertension (CH = 63.8%/PL = 72.6%/UA = 87.2%), atrial fibrillation (CH = 28.3%/PL = 41.4%/UA = 39.4%), hyperlipidemia (CH = 84.9%/PL = 76.4%/UA = 17%) (each p < 0.001) and active smoking (CH = 32.2%/PL = 27.3%/UA = 10.2%) (p < 0.007). Three-months favorable outcome (mRS = 0-2) was seen in CH = 63.1%/PL = 50%/UA = 59% (unadjusted-p = 0.01/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.601/0.981), excellent outcome (mRS = 0-1) in CH = 48.5%/PL = 32.1%/UA = 27% (unadjusted-p < 0.001/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.201/0.08 and adjusted-OR CH-UA = 2.09). Three-months mortality was similar between groups (CH = 17.2%/PL = 15.7%/UA = 4.8%) (unadjusted-p = 0.71/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.087/0.24). Three-months recurrent stroke/TIA occurred in CH = 3.1%/PL = 10.7%/UA = 3.1%, adjusted-p/OR CH-PL = 0.04/0.32). Three-months follow-up medication intake rates were the same for antihypertensives. Statin/OAC intake was lowest in UA = 67.1%/25.5% (CH = 87.3%/39.2%/unadjusted-p < 0.001/adjusted-p CH-UA = 0.02/0.012/adjusted-OR CH-UA = 2.33/2.18). Oral intake of antidiabetics was lowest in CH = 10.8% (PL = 15.7%/UA = 16.1%/unadjusted-p = 0.245/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.061/0.002/adjusted-OR CH-UA = 0.25). Smoking rates decreased in all groups during follow-up. Substantial differences in presentation, treatment and secondary prevention measures, are linked to a twofold difference in adjusted 3-months excellent outcome between Switzerland and Ukraine. This underscores the importance of socioeconomic factors that influence stroke outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for targeted interventions to address disparities in treatment and secondary prevention strategies.

Secondary Prevention in Patients With Stroke Versus Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of 2 National Cohorts.

The implementation of preventive therapies among patients with stroke remains inadequately explored, especially when compared with patients with myocardial infarction (MI), despite sharing similar vascular risk profiles. We tested the hypothesis that participants with a history of stroke have a worse cardiovascular prevention profile in comparison to participants with MI. In cross-sectional analyses within the UK Biobank and All of Us Research Program, involving 14 760 (9193 strokes, 5567 MIs) and 7315 (2948 strokes, 4367 MIs) participants, respectively, we evaluated cardiovascular prevention profiles assessing low-density lipoprotein (<100 mg/dL), blood pressure (systolic, <140 mm Hg; and diastolic, <90 mm Hg), statin and antiplatelet use, and a cardiovascular prevention score that required meeting at least 3 of these criteria. The results revealed that, within the UK Biobank, patients with stroke had significantly lower odds of meeting all the preventive criteria compared with patients with MI: low-density lipoprotein control (odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.78]; P<0.001), blood pressure control (OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.59-0.68]; P<0.001), statin use (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.42-0.48]; P<0.001), antiplatelet therapy use (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.27-0.32]; P<0.001), and cardiovascular prevention score (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.39-0.45]; P<0.001). Similar patterns were observed in the All of Us Research Program, with significant differences across all comparisons (P<0.05), and further analysis suggested that the odds of having a good cardiovascular prevention score were influenced by race and ethnicity as well as neighborhood deprivation levels (interaction P<0.05 in both cases). In 2 independent national cohorts, patients with stroke showed poorer cardiovascular prevention profiles and lower adherence to guideline-directed therapies compared with patients with MI. These findings underscore the need to explore the reasons behind the underuse of secondary prevention in vulnerable stroke survivors.

Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of the Early Initiation of Antithrombotic Secondary Prevention in Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background and Objectives: Current guidelines and the alteplase product insert recommend that antithrombotic therapy be avoided within 24 h of intravenous thrombolytic therapy with rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke. Therefore, the rate of stroke recurrence is unclear in terms of early neurological deterioration, which we could prevent with the early administration of antithrombotic therapy. We do not know the effect of early antithrombotic therapy after intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA in acute stroke on the outcome in patients after 90 days either. Design: Prospective monocentric observational cohort study. Methods: Data were collected from consecutive patients treated with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke between January 2015 and January 2023. We examined functional outcome at 90 days, including the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality rate as safety indicators and stroke recurrence events in both early and standard antithrombotic therapy at 24 h after intravenous thrombolysis. Results: A total of 489 patients were included, of which 278 (56.9%) were men. Of these, 407 (83.2%) patients received early antithrombotic therapy. No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in any participants. There was a significantly higher number of patients with an excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) in early antithrombotic treatment (211 (53.1%) versus 28 (34.6%) in standard antithrombotic treatment (p = 0.002, OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.76). Conclusions: Early antithrombotic treatment after intravenous therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke revealed no safety concerns compared with standard antithrombotic therapy and resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients with an excellent functional outcome.

Controversy in cardiology: clopidogrel or acetylsalicylic acid in the treatment of chronic coronary syndromes?

Secondary prevention of patients with chronic coronary syndrome is based on the long-term use of a single anti-aggregating drug which is traditionally represented by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in light of the results of studies and meta-analyses which have demonstrated a clear anti-ischaemic efficacy against of an acceptable increase in the risk of bleeding, especially intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding. The availability of drugs such as clopidogrel, which inhibits platelet activity through the P2Y12 receptor pathway, has called into question this paradigm, also in consideration of the fact that the scientific evidence that supports the use of ASA in secondary prevention is based on dated studies with some limitations. Over the last few years, randomized trials have demonstrated how clopidogrel has an efficacy profile comparable to that of ASA and a safety profile that is sometimes even better. In light of the new evidence, it is therefore legitimate to ask whether in this clinical scenario, ASA should still be considered the drug of choice or whether clopidogrel could represent the preferable alternative.

Low-dose colchicine for atherosclerosis: long-term safety.

Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily) is now FDA-approved for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease and will be increasingly prescribed in clinical practice. In this State-of-the-Art Review, data were collated from contemporary systemic reviews of case reports, drug registries, and placebo-controlled trials that assessed specific issues of safety related to the continuous use of colchicine in a range of clinical settings to inform physicians, pharmacists, and patients of the absolute risks of continuous use of low-dose colchicine, including among individuals taking statin therapy. Based upon these collective data, it is concluded that aside mild diarrhoea on initiation of colchicine that typically subsides in the vast majority of patients within a week of therapy, continuous use of low-dose colchicine is well tolerated and very safe. It does not affect renal, liver, or cognitive function, has no adverse effects on bleeding, wound healing, fertility, or pregnancy, and does not increase risks of cancer, serious infection, or cause-specific mortality. When appropriately prescribed to patients without significant renal or hepatic impairment, reports of myelosuppression, myotoxicity, and serious drug-drug interactions are rare and no more frequent than placebo, including in patients taking statin therapy. Physicians, pharmacists, and patients can be reassured that in the absence of significant renal or hepatic impairment continuous use of low-dose colchicine can be used safely in patients with atherosclerosis for the purpose of reducing cardiovascular risk.

Drug intervention as an emerging concept for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease.

Non-culprit lesion-related coronary events are a significant concern in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing coronary intervention. Since several studies using intra-coronary imaging modalities have reported a high prevalence of vulnerable plaques in non-culprit lesions at the initial coronary event, the immediate stabilization of these plaques by intensive pharmacological regimens may contribute to the reduction in the adverse events. Although current treatment guidelines recommend the titration of statin and other drugs to attain the treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in patients with CAD, the early prescription of strong LDL-C lowering drugs with more intensive regimen may further reduce the incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events. In fact, several studies with intensive regimen have demonstrated a higher percentage of patients with the attainment of LDL-C treatment goal in the early phase following discharge. In addition to many imaging studies showing plaque stabilization by LDL-C lowering drugs, several recent reports have shown the efficacy of early statin and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors on the immediate stabilization of non-culprit coronary plaques. To raise awareness regarding this important concept of immediate plaque stabilization and subsequent reduction in the incidence of recurrent coronary events, the term 'Drug Intervention' has been introduced and gradually applied in the clinical field, although a clear definition is lacking. The main target of this concept is patients with acute coronary syndrome as a higher prevalence of vulnerable plaques in non-culprit lesions in addition to the worse clinical outcomes has been reported in recent imaging studies. In this article, we discuss the backgrounds and the concept of drug intervention.

Improving secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome through electronic prescribing plans, a quality improvement project

Improving secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome through electronic prescribing plans, a quality improvement project

Primary and secondary prevention of stroke and cardiovascular events using evolocumab and alirocumab: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Although the clinical role of protein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for cholesterol management is increasing, the post-marketing period of use is short compared to other lipid-lowering drugs, so there is still insufficient evidence for their efficacy and safety. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated preventive effects of stroke and cardiovascular (CV) events using evolocumab and alirocumab. We assessed the relative risk of stroke and CV events after alirocumab or evolocumab treatment in individuals with or without clinical CV diseases compared with that in controls. In addition, we evaluated the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke. A total of 25 articles were included (median of study duration = 52 weeks). The risk of stroke was significantly decreased after treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention in patients without CV diseases: RR = 0.733; 95% CI, 0.618-0.870; secondary prevention in patients with CV diseases: RR = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.562-0.880). The risk of CV events also significantly decreased in patients treated with alirocumab or evolocumab (primary prevention: RR = 0.818; 95% CI, 0.777-0.861; secondary prevention: RR = 0.725; 95% CI, 0.578-0.910). The relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly different between PCSK9 inhibitor-treated patients and controls (RR=1.041; 95% CI, 0.690-1.573). Our findings indicate that evolocumab and alirocumab are significantly effective without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Based on this, the PCSK9 inhibitors can be highly recommended for cholesterol management.

Lifestyle counselling as secondary prevention in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack: a randomized controlled pilot study

BackgroundPatients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attacks have an increased risk of future strokes. These patients are often discharged home with limited specialized follow-up, although close to half of them experience cognitive deficits. Simple encouragements to avoid smoking, be physically active, and to take preventive medication are often insufficient to ensure adherence and more comprehensive interventions are needed to support the patients in adapting healthy behaviour. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and potential effect of an early initiated, patient-centred intervention to patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attacks targeting smoking, physical activity, and medication adherence, in a randomized, controlled pilot trial.MethodsHospitalized patients were randomized to usual care or an intervention consisting of health behavioural counselling based on the 5A’s model, telephone follow-up (4 and 8 weeks), and monitoring of physical activity. Follow-up time was 12 weeks. Feasibility was on the following domains: eligibility, acceptance, demand and practicality, adherence, attrition, and implementation and integration.ResultsForty patients of 84 potentially eligible were randomized to the two treatment arms (20 intervention/20 usual care). Thirty-two completed the 12-week follow-up, while 8 were either excluded or lost to follow-up. With few changes, the intervention was feasible and possible to deliver according to the protocol.ConclusionIt was possible to identify relevant patients who could potentially benefit from a behavioural intervention, recruit and randomize them early after admission and retain most participants in the study until follow-up and derive statistical estimates to guide the design of large-scale randomized controlled trials.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03648957. Registered 28 August 2018.

Regional disparities and risk factors of mortality among patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death in emerging countries: a nonrandomized controlled trial

BackgroundComprehensive data on patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in emerging countries are lacking. The aim was to deepen our understanding of the SCD phenotype and identify risk factors for death among patients at high risk of SCD in emerging countries.MethodsPatients who met the class I indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to guideline recommendations in 17 countries and regions underrepresented in previous trials were enrolled. Countries were stratified by the WHO regional classification. Patients were or were not implanted with an ICD at their discretion. The outcomes were all-cause mortality and SCD.ResultsWe enrolled 4222 patients, and 3889 patients were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 21.6 ± 10.2 months. There were 433 (11.1%) instances of all-cause mortality and 117 (3.0%) cases of SCD. All-cause mortality was highest in primary prevention (PP) patients from Southeast Asia and secondary prevention (SP) patients from the Middle East and Africa. The SCD rates among PP and SP patients were both highest in South Asia. Multivariate Cox regression modelling demonstrated that in addition to the independent predictors identified in previous studies, both geographic region and ICD use were associated with all-cause mortality in patients with high SCD risk. Primary prophylactic ICD implantation was associated with a 36% (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.531–0.802, p < 0.0001) lower all-cause mortality risk and an 80% (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.116–0.343, p < 0.0001) lower SCD risk.ConclusionsThere was significant heterogeneity among patients with high SCD risk in emerging countries. The influences of geographic regions on patient characteristics and outcomes were significant. Improvement in increasing ICD utilization and uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy in emerging countries is urgent.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02099721.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage: An International Cohort Study.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the cerebellum has a poor short-term prognosis, whereas data on the long-term case fatality and recurrent vascular events are sparse. Herewith, we aimed to assess the long-term case fatality and recurrence rate of vascular events after a first cerebellar ICH. In this international cohort study, we included patients from 10 hospitals (the United States and Europe from 1997 to 2017) aged ≥18 years with a first spontaneous cerebellar ICH who were discharged alive. Data on long-term case fatality and recurrence of vascular events (recurrent ICH [supratentoria or infratentorial], ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or major vascular surgery) were collected for survival analysis and absolute event rate calculation. We included 405 patients with cerebellar ICH (mean age [SD], 72 [13] years, 49% female). The median survival time was 67 months (interquartile range, 23-100 months), with a cumulative survival rate of 34% at 10-year follow-up (median follow-up time per center ranged: 15-80 months). In the 347 patients with data on vascular events 92 events occurred in 78 patients, after initial cerebellar ICH: 31 (8.9%) patients had a recurrent ICH (absolute event rate, 1.8 per 100 patient-years [95% CI, 1.2-2.6]), 39 (11%) had an ischemic stroke (absolute event rate, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.6-3.2]), 13 (3.7%) had a myocardial infarction (absolute event rate, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.4-1.3]), and 5 (1.4%) underwent major vascular surgery (absolute event rate, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.7]). The median time to a first vascular event during follow-up was 27 months (interquartile range, 8.7-50 months), with a cumulative hazard of 47% at 10 years. The long-term prognosis of patients who survive a first spontaneous cerebellar ICH is poor and comparable to that of patients who survive a first supratentorial ICH. Further identification of patients at high risk of vascular events following the initial cerebellar ICH is needed. Including patients with cerebellar ICH in randomized controlled trials on secondary prevention of patients with ICH is warranted.

A Retrospective Study: The Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Medications in Individuals at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

Objective: The effective administration of lipid-lowering treatment is of utmost importance in mitigating cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients who are undergoing secondary prevention.&#x0D; High-dose statins, ezetimibe, and the relatively newer PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have shown effectiveness in achieving low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) treatment targets for these patients.&#x0D; However, despite substantial evidence supporting their efficacy, these interventions remain significantly underutilized, primarily due to poor levels of patient adherence.&#x0D; Moreover, there is limited data available on the overall effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering treatment and the proportion of secondary prevention patients who have achieved a well-regulated lipid profile.&#x0D; In light of these factors, the principal aim of this investigation was to evaluate the present status of lipid-lowering medication within this specific group of individuals.&#x0D; Methods: The study was conducted at Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin Training and Research Hospital between April 2021 and March 2023, focusing on patients with a history of secondary prevention of CVD. The study investigated prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs, factors contributing to statin underuse, and lipid profile disclosure.&#x0D; Results: 872 patients were included. 86.8% received statins, 5.2% ezetimibe, and 3.4% fibrates, while 13.2% received no lipid-lowering therapy. 64% of those on statins were on high doses. LDL-C values were assessed in 452 patients, with only 30% below the recommended cutoff of 70 mg/dL.&#x0D; Conclusion: In this investigation involving secondary prevention patients, slightly over half of the participants received high-dose statins, while a negligible proportion received ezetimibe treatment.&#x0D; Alarmingly, over two-thirds of the patients demonstrated LDL-C values that deviated significantly from the therapeutic range, indicating a considerable gap between their lipid profiles and the recommendations set forth by clinical guidelines.

Effect of aspirin on blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionAspirin is widely used for secondary prevention in patients with hypertension. However, previous studies mainly focused on the preventive effects of aspirin, and there has been a lack of reliable evidence on whether taking aspirin affects blood pressure This study aimed to investigate whether aspirin would affect the blood pressure in patients with hypertension.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Scopus and Medline databases were searched until September 2023. For continuous variables (e.g., blood pressure reduction), the mean difference (MD) was selected as the effect magnitude indices. We used the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool to assess the risk of bias.ResultA total of five studies were included, comprising 20,312 patients. We found that aspirin did not affect SBP (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: − 2.41, 0.84). A similar result was found for DBP (MD = -0.86, 95% CI: − 2.14, 0.42).ConclusionThis study showed no significant difference in blood pressure between the aspirin and control groups, suggesting that aspirin does not affect blood pressure.

Impact of mHealth application on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation guidelines after a coronary event: Randomised controlled clinical trial protocol.

Coronary disease is the main cause of death around the world. mHealth technology is considered attractive and promising to promote behavioural changes aimed at healthy lifestyle habits among coronary patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an mHealth intervention regarding improved results in secondary prevention in patients after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or angina in terms of lifestyle, clinical variables and therapeutic compliance. Randomised clinical trial with 300 patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implant. They will be assigned to either the mHealth group, subject to a self-monitored educational intervention involving an internet application installed on their mobile phone or tablet, or to a control group receiving standard healthcare (150 patients in each arm). The primary outcome variables will be adherence to the Mediterranean diet, physical activity, smoking, therapeutic compliance, knowledge acquired, user-friendliness and satisfaction with the application. Measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, waist circumference (WC) and the 6-min walk test will be taken. Furthermore, the blood lipid profile, glucose and HbA1c will be evaluated. Clinical interview will be conducted, and validated questionnaires completed. The primary quantitative results will be compared using an analysis of covariance adjusted for age and sex. A multivariate analysis will be performed to examine the association of the intervention with lifestyle habits, the control of cardiovascular risk factors (CDRFs) and the results after the hospital discharge (major adverse events, treatment compliance and lifestyle). The study will provide evidence about the effectiveness of an mHealth intervention at improving the lifestyle of the participants and could be offered to patients with coronary disease to complement existing services. NCT05247606. [https://ClinicalTrials.gov]. 21/02/2022.

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Colchicine has shown potential cardioprotective effects owing to its broad anti-inflammatory properties. We performed a meta-analysis to assess its safety and efficacy in secondary prevention in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD). We searched Ovid Healthstar, MEDLINE, and Embase (inception to May 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the cardiovascular effects of colchicine compared with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Study-level data on efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using the Peto method. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. A total of 8 RCTs were included with a follow-up duration of ≥1 month, comprising a total of 12,151 patients. Compared with placebo or usual care, colchicine was associated with a significant risk reduction in the primary outcome (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, P < 0.0001; I2 = 52%). Risks of MI (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91, P = 0.003; I2 = 33%), stroke (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74, P = 0.001; I2 = 0%), and unplanned coronary revascularization (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82, P = 0.0001; I2 = 58%) were all reduced in the colchicine group. Rates of CV and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups, but there was an increase in noncardiac deaths with colchicine (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.15, P = 0.01; I2 = 51%). The occurrence of all other adverse events was similar between the two groups, including GI reactions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.20, P = 0.35; I2 = 42%) and infections (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.74; I2 = 53%). Colchicine therapy may reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients with established CAD; however, there remains a concern about non-CV mortality. Further trials are underway that will shed light on non-CV mortality and colchicine NCT03048825, and NCT02898610.

Retrospective Evaluation of LDL-C Levels Following First Treatment With Inclisiran as Part of Secondary Prevention ASCVD Risk Reduction in a Real-World Primary Care Setting

Introduction: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. There is a direct relationship between increasing levels of LDL-C and increased risk of ASCVD. Guidance from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) recommends that high-risk ASCVD patients maintain an LDL-C &lt;1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and very high-risk patients &lt;1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL). National data in England reveals that 71% of high-risk secondary prevention patients have an LDL-C &gt;1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Methodology: An ASCVD risk reduction approach was initiated in a primary care clinic in December 2021. Of those patients who underwent review between December 2021 and July 2023, 102 patients were started on inclisiran treatment in a real-world setting. These patients were retrospectively reviewed to determine the initial effects of using inclisiran after the first dose as part of the patients’ ASCVD risk reduction management. Results: After 1 injection of Inclisiran, the patients’ mean decrease in LDL-C was 2.00 mmol/L (77.3 mg/dL) after a mean of 87 days. This represented a mean reduction of 61.7% (SD = 19.8) in their LDL-C measurements. The addition of inclisiran resulted in 79.4% of patients achieving an LDL-C target of &lt;1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and 65.7% of patients attaining an LDL-C of &lt;1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL). Conclusion: Healthcare providers working in primary care can achieve recommended LDL-C targets in 4 out of 5 secondary prevention patients after an initial dose of inclisiran as part of their ASCVD risk reduction approach management.

Vascular surgeons and best medical therapy: Missed opportunities?

Multiple guidelines recommend the use of best medical therapy (BMT) as secondary prevention for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) but prescription and adherence are generally sub-optimal.1 The issue is not specific to vascular surgeons. Patients referred with suspected peripheral arterial disease are only started on antiplatelet agents and statins by their primary care physician in about half of cases.2 Following coronary artery bypass grafting, 1 in 5 patients are discharged without a statin prescription.3 Using a series of structured interviews through an implementation science lens, Xu et al. have identified a number of potential obstacles to improve BMT prescription patterns.4