Secondary Patellar Resurfacing Research Articles

The Vega advanced third generation posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty system enables the restoration of range of motion for high demanding daily activities - A 5-years follow-up study.

The Vega System® PS (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) is an advanced, third generation fixed implant that aims to mimic natural knee kinematics by optimizing pivotal motion while reducing surface stress. This study evaluated mid-term survival and clinical outcomes, including range of motion (ROM) of the modern posterior stabilized implant in order to analyse whether this biomechanically successful implant reaches good results in situ. The first 100 patients to receive the Vega PS System for total knee arthroplasty were invited to take part in this single centre, single surgeon study. Of these, 84 patients were clinically assessed 5-6 years postoperatively. Data which was obtained during this follow-up examination included revision data, range of motion and clinical scores. The 5-year survival rate for exchange of any component was 97.6%, whereby two patients required replacement of the polyethylene gliding surface. Secondary patella resurfacing was performed in 7 patients. Significantly improved results in comparison to the preoperative state could be obtained at the follow-up: KOOS improved from 39.4 to 78.8, SF-12 PCS improved from 32.1 to 42 SF-12 MCS improved from 46 to 53.8 and patella pain improved from 2.7 to 0.3. The mean ROM of the 84 patients after 5 years was 133.1° and mean total KSS was 189.9. This study demonstrates a high survival rate of the Vega PS System® and significant improvements in clinical outcomes 5 years after implantation. The obtained mean ROM indicates that this implant provides good flexibility of the knee joint, allowing a high number of activities. However, due to the rate of secondary patella implantation, routine resurfacing of the patella for all PS TKA cases is highly recommended. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02802085).

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing Following Primary Unresurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beware of the Incidence of Late Patellar Erosion

BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) indications and rates in a single-surgeon series utilizing a modern TKA design and additionally, to review the functional outcomes of patients after undergoing SPR. MethodsA retrospective review of a prospectively collected institutional database was performed. All patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were included. During this time, the senior surgeon resurfaced the patella selectively. Patients were divided into the primary resurfaced (PR) and the primary unresurfaced (UR). All patients undergoing SPR in the UR group were identified, their radiographs reviewed, and their clinical outcomes assessed. During the study period, 1,511 TKAs were performed, with 73.1% (1,105 TKAs) being unresurfaced. ResultsThe all-cause revision rate was 1.2% in the PR group and 3.6% in the UR group. The rate of SPR in the UR group was 2.0% (22 of 1,105 TKAs). No patient in the PR group underwent revision surgery for a patellar complication. The mean age at primary TKA for those undergoing SPR was 65 years (range, 50 to 78). The average time for SPR from primary TKA was 3.4 years (range, 1.1 to 8.8). Postoperative radiographic progression of patellar erosion, in combination with new onset anterior knee pain, was the indication for SPR in 14 of the 22 (63.7%) SPR cases. After SPR, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index score (P < .001) and Knee Society Score (P < .001) improved from pre-SPR. ConclusionsSecondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) was the most common (55%) reason for revision surgery after primary UR TKA in this series. An SPR improved clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients. Surgeons should consider patellar resurfacing for all patients undergoing primary TKA to reduce the burden of revision surgery post-TKA. Additionally, the paradigm that late SPR does not improve clinical outcomes needs to be revisited.

What are the Outcomes of Secondary Patella Resurfacing for Dissatisfaction Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 604 Knees

BackgroundSecondary patella resurfacing is often performed for dissatisfaction following primary knee arthroplasty where the native patella was retained. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of secondary patella resurfacing. MethodsThe systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting on patients who underwent secondary patella resurfacing after previous primary knee arthroplasty with retention of the native patella were considered eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies tool. A random-effects model and the inverse-variance weighting method was used for meta-analysis. There were sixteen retrospective studies including 604 knees (594 patients) with a mean follow up of 42 months (range, 2 to 197). ResultsAn overall improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) was achieved in 53% of cases from pooled data available for 293 knees [95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.44, 0.62), I2=68% - moderate heterogeneity]. The pooled proportion of patients satisfied with the procedure was 59% [95% CI (48, 68), I2 = 70% - moderate heterogeneity] in a sample size of 415. There was a minimal rate (2%) of complication incidence when performing secondary patella resurfacing and a pooled rate of revision surgery of 10%. ConclusionsAn improvement in pain, satisfaction, and PROMs was achieved in slightly more than half of the patients following secondary patella resurfacing. However, studies lacked standardized objective selection criteria for the procedure and the available data was predominantly retrospective, with high heterogeneity and variation in outcome reporting.

Low readmission and reattendance rate in day-case total knee arthroplasties.

The rate of day-case total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the UK is currently approximately 0.5%. Reducing length of stay allows orthopaedic providers to improve efficiency, increase operative throughput, and tackle the rising demand for joint arthroplasty surgery and the COVID-19-related backlog. Here, we report safe delivery of day-case TKA in an NHS trust via inpatient wards with no additional resources. Day-case TKAs, defined as patients discharged on the same calendar day as surgery, were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum follow-up of six months. Analysis of hospital and primary care records was performed to determine readmission and reattendance rates. Telephone interviews were conducted to determine patient satisfaction. Since 2016, 301/7350 TKAs (4.1%) in 290 patients at our institution were discharged on the day of surgery. Mean follow-up was 31.4 months (6.2 to 70.0). In all, 28 patients (9.3%) attended the emergency department or other acute care settings within 90 days of surgery, most often with wound concerns or leg swelling; six patients (2.0%) were readmitted. No patients underwent a subsequent revision procedure, and there were no periprosthetic infections. Two patients (0.7%) underwent secondary patella resurfacing, and one patient underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis after previous manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). Three patients (1.0%) underwent MUA alone. Primary care consultation records, available for 206 patients, showed 16 patients (7.8%) contacted their general practitioner within two weeks postoperatively; two (1.0%) were referred to secondary care. Overall, 115/121 patients (95%) telephoned stated they would have day-case TKA again. Day-case TKA can be safely delivered in the NHS with no additional resources. We found low incidence of contact with primary and secondary care in the postoperative period, and high patient satisfaction.

LOW READMISSION AND REATTENDANCE RATE FOR 301 CONSECUTIVE DAY-CASE TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTIES DELIVERED IN A NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE TRUST IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

AbstractIntroductionThe rate of day-case total knee replacement (TKR) in the UK is currently ~0.5%. Reducing length of stay improves efficiency, increases operative throughput and tackles the rising demand for joint replacement surgery and the COVID-19 related backlog. We report safe delivery of day-case TKR in an NHS Trust via inpatient wards, with no additional resources.MethodologyDay-case TKRs, defined as patients discharged on the same calendar day as surgery, were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum follow-up of six-months. Analysis of hospital and primary care records was performed to determine readmission and reattendance rates. Telephone interviews were conducted to determine patient satisfaction.ResultsBetween 2016 and 2021, 301/7350 (4.1%) TKRs were discharged on the day of surgery. Mean follow-up was 31.4 (6.2–70.0) months. 28 (9.3%) patients attended Accident and Emergency or other acute care settings within 90-days of surgery; six (2.0%) patients were readmitted. No patients underwent a subsequent revision procedure. There were no prosthetic infections. Two patients underwent secondary patella resurfacing, and one patient underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis after previous manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). Three patients underwent MUA alone. Primary care consultation records, available for 206 patients, showed 16 (7.8%) patients contacted their General Practitioner within two-weeks post-operatively; two (1.0%) were referred to secondary care. 115/121 (95%) patients telephoned stated they would have day-case TKR again.ConclusionDay-case TKR can be safely delivered in the NHS with no additional resources. We found low incidence of contact with primary and secondary care in the post-operative period, and high patient satisfaction.

LONG-TERM SURVIVAL RATES ARE SIMILAR WITH OR WITHOUT PATELLAR RESURFACING AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, HOWEVER, HIGHER REVISION RATE WITHOUT PATELLAR RESURFACING CAN BE PROSTHETIC-SPECIFIC: A NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY ANALYSIS

AbstractIntroductionThe role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. We questioned the effect of patellar resurfacing on the early and late revision rates after total knee arthroplasty.Materials and MethodsWe analysed the data of cumulative revisions of primary knee replacement from the NJR 19th Annual Report. NJR included secondary patellar resurfacing as a revision. We compared differences in the 3-year and 15-year revision rates between the patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing for the different combinations of total knee replacements using a paired t-test. We performed subgroup analysis for the five combinations with the highest volumes.ResultsTwenty-seven implant combinations had the 15-year revision rates reported. Patellar resurfacing group had lower mean 3-year revision rate of 1.68 (SD 0.7) compared to 2.02 (SD 0.9) in non-resurfacing group (p=0.05). However, 15-year revision rate was similar between the two groups (mean 5.7, SD 2.1 vs. mean 5.7, SD 2.2; p = 0.46).High volume implants showed that two combinations (NexGen CR and PS) had similar revision rates at 3 and 15 years between resurfacing and non-resurfacing groups. Three combinations (PFC Sigma CR and PS and Genesis 2 CR) had higher revision rate in non-resurfacing group at 3 years (p=0.01) and the difference persisted at 15 years (p=0.05).ConclusionsAlthough revision rate in total knee arthroplasty was higher without patellar resurfacing at 3 years, at 15 years the difference was not significant. However, the higher revision without patellar resurfacing can be prosthetic combination specific which surgeons need to be aware of.

Translated article] Total knee arthroplasty is effective in patients with Parkinson's disease. Functional assessment and analysis of complications

IntroductionThanks to improvements in the medical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), the life expectancy of these patients has increased, but the overall outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We aim to analyse a series of patients with PD, evaluating their clinical status, functional results, complications and survival rates after TKA. MethodsWe retrospectively studied 31 patients with PD operated between 2014 and 2020. The mean age was 71 years (SD±5.8). There were 16 female patients. The mean follow-up was 68.2 months (SD±36). We used the knee scoring system (KSS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for the functional evaluation. The modified Hoehn and Yahr scale was used to assess the severity of PD. All complications were recorded, and survival curves were performed. ResultsThe mean postoperative KSS evaluation had an increase of 40 points [35 (SD±15) vs 75 (SD±15) (p<.001)]. The mean postoperative VAS decreased 5 points [8 (SD±2) vs 3 (SD±2) (p<.001)]. Thirteen patients reported being very satisfied, 13 were satisfied, and only 5 were poorly satisfied. Seven patients suffered surgical complications, and 4 patients had recurrent patellar instability. At a mean 68.2 months follow-up, the overall survival rate was 93.5%. When considering the secondary patellar resurfacing as the endpoint, the survival rate was 80.6%. ConclusionsIn this study, TKA was associated with excellent functional outcomes in patients with PD. At a mean 68.2 months follow-up, TKA had excellent survivorship in the short term, with recurrent patellar instability as the most common complication. Even though these findings confirm the effectiveness of TKA in this population, a thorough clinical evaluation and multidisciplinary approach are needed to decrease the likelihood of complications.

Higher failure rate of secondary patellar resurfacing following bicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The role of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) in anterior knee pain (AKP) is still debated in literature. A regional arthroplasty registry was investigated, aiming to: (1) assess the survival rate of SPR; and (2) compare SPR to tricompartmental TKA. The regional arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated about all SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty. The survival rates and the reasons for revision were assessed as any other factor that could have influenced implants failure. SPR survivorship was compared to tricompartmental TKAs. 406 SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty were analyzed. The survival rates were 80.6% (CI 95% 75.9-84.5) at 5years and 77.6% (CI 95% 72.4-82) at 7years. Half of the SPRs was performed 0.9-2.4years after the index bicompartmental arthroplasty. SPR achieved lower survival than tricompartmental TKA (80.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio for failure of 5.5 (CI 95% 4.2-7.1, p < 0.001). SPRs performed within 2years after primary implant had a significantly higher rates of failure when compared to tricompartmental TKA (HR: 6.4, CI 95% 4.8-8.4, p < 0.001). SPR after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty showed modest 5- and 7-year survival rates, worse than primary tricompartmental TKA. When SPRs are performed within 2years after primary arthroplasty, a significant higher risk of failure should be expected, highlighting than appropriate pre-operative work-up and patient selection is crucial for SPR successful outcome. III, therapeutic study.

La artroplastia total de rodilla en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson es efectiva. Evaluación funcional y análisis de complicaciones

IntroductionThanks to improvements in the medical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), the life expectancy of these patients has increased, but the overall outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We aim to analyse a series of patients with PD, evaluating their clinical status, functional results, complications and survival rates after TKA. MethodsWe retrospectively studied 31 patients with PD operated between 2014-2020. The mean age was 71 years (SD±5.8). There were 16 female patients. The mean follow-up was 68.2 months (SD±36). We used the Knee Scoring System (KSS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the functional evaluation. The Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale was used to assess the severity of PD. All complications were recorded, and survival curves were performed. ResultsThe mean postoperative KSS evaluation had an increase of 40 points [35 (SD±15) vs 75 (SD±15) (P<.001)]. The mean postoperative VAS decreased 5 points [8 (SD±2) vs 3 (SD±2) (P<.001)]. Thirteen patients reported being very satisfied, 13 were satisfied, and only 5 were poorly satisfied. Seven patients suffered surgical complications, and 4 patients had recurrent patellar instability. At a mean 68.2 months follow-up, the overall survival rate was 93.5%. When considering the secondary patellar resurfacing as the endpoint, the survival rate was 80.6%. ConclusionsIn this study, TKA was associated with excellent functional outcomes in patients with PD. At a mean 68.2 months follow-up, TKA had excellent survivorship in the short term, with recurrent patellar instability as the most common complication. Even though these findings confirm the effectiveness of TKA in this population, a thorough clinical evaluation and multidisciplinary approach are needed to decrease the likelihood of complications.

Topical vancomycin powder does not affect patella cartilage degeneration in primary total knee arthroplasty and conversion rate for secondary patella resurfacing.

Vancomycin powder (VP) is an antibiotic first introduced in pediatric spinal surgery to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). Recently its topical application was expanded to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Toxicity to cartilage is the subject of current research. The aim of this study was to prove the hypothesis that topical application of VP in TKA does not result in a degeneration of patella cartilage. We propagate that the conversion rate for secondary patella resurfacing is not influenced by its use. Between 2014 and 2021, 4292 joints were included in this monocentric retrospective cohort study. All patients underwent TKA without primary patella resurfacing. After a change of the procedure in the hospital, one group (VPG) was administered VP intraoperatively. The other group (nVPG) received no VP during surgery (nVPG). The remaining perioperative procedure was constant over the investigation period. Conversion rates for secondary patella resurfacing for both groups were determined without making distinctions in the indication. A second cohort was composed of patients presenting for follow-up examination 12months after TKA and included 210 joints. Retrospective radiographic evaluations were performed preoperatively, before discharge and at follow-up examination. Patella axial radiographs were analyzed for patella tracking (lateral patellar tilt, patellar displacement) and patella degeneration (Sperner classification, patellofemoral joint space). There was no significant difference in the conversion rate for secondary patella resurfacing (4.24% VPG, 4.97% nVPG). Patella tracking and patella degeneration did not differ significantly between both groups. The topical application of VP does not influence the conversion rate for secondary patella resurfacing. Moreover, it does not result in a degeneration of patella cartilage in TK. Retrospective case series, Level III.

Does the degree of intraoperatively identified cartilage loss affect the outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing? A prospective comparative cohort study

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate whether the degree of patellar cartilage loss confirmed during index surgery affects the clinical and radiologic outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed without patellar resurfacing.MethodsWe prospectively divided 2012 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months into two groups according to intraoperatively graded cartilage lesions graded using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) system: group 1, grades 0‒2 (n = 110); group 2, grades 3‒4 (n = 102). Relevant locations, such as medial, lateral, or both facets of the patella, were also assessed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Feller’s patella score, and Kujala anterior knee pain score. Radiographic outcomes included patellar tilt angle and lateral patellar shift on Merchant’s view.ResultsClinical and radiographic outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. No patient underwent secondary patellar resurfacing. Although the lateral facet was significantly more involved, there were no significant differences in outcomes.ConclusionsThe degree of intraoperatively identified patellar cartilage loss did not affect the short-term outcomes following primary TKA without patellar resurfacing.Level of evidence II: Prospective comparative study.

Eighteen-Year Outcome of an Uncemented "Meniscal Bearing", Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee System

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate the survival, radiographic, and functional outcomes of the uncemented “meniscal bearing” cruciate-retaining Low Contact Stress (LCS) (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) total knee system after a long-term follow-up period. MethodsA total of 56 patients (67 knees) who received an uncemented “meniscal bearing” cruciate-retaining LCS total knee system between 2000 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were 64 ± 7 years old with osteoarthritis as the indication for arthroplasty. The survivorship, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. ResultsThe all-cause survival after 5, 10, 15, and 18 years was 97.0%, 93.8%, 92.0%, and 92.0%, respectively. Survival with revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 98.4% at 5 years and 96.7% at 10, 15, and 18 years. Reasons of revisions and their interventions consisted of anterior knee pain requiring secondary patellar resurfacing (n = 3, 60%), polyethylene wear requiring an insert exchange (n = 2, 40%), and bearing spin-out requiring an insert exchange (n = 1, 20%). Two of the 5 revision cases developed aseptic loosening of the tibial component later on during the study period. A radiographic analysis demonstrated radiolucent lines in 14/47 implants (30%) after 12.0 ± 3.8 years, but were not revised, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 18.5 years, PROMs (n = 20) were found comparable with the 1-year postoperative PROMs of all implants reported by the LROI (Dutch Arthroplasty Register). ConclusionThis present study demonstrates good results of the uncemented “meniscal bearing” cruciate-retaining LCS total knee system toward survival and functional outcomes after a long-term median follow-up of 17.5 years. Level of EvidenceTherapeutic retrospective cohort study, LEVEL III.

Rare primary patellar resurfacing does not lead to more secondary patellar resurfacing: analysis of 70,014 primary total knee arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).

Background and purposeCurrent literature provides no conclusive evidence in support of a patellar resurfacing vs. non-resurfacing regime. Therefore, we compared the incidence of secondary patellar resurfacing among hospitals using 3 different primary patellar resurfacing regimes in the Netherlands. Secondarily we identified patient and surgical characteristics associated with primary patellar resurfacing and secondary patella resurfacing following non-resurfaced primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Patients and methodsWe used data from 2014–2016 of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Hospitals were divided into rare (0–10%), selective (>10% to 90%), and usually primary patellar resurfacing (>90%) regimes. We performed a logistic regression analysis for associated factors of primary patellar resurfacing in the selective resurfacing subgroup and for secondary patellar resurfacing in the rare resurfacing subgroup.ResultsThe rate of primary resurfacing was 5.2% for the rare and 36% for the selective patellar resurfacing regimes, with similar secondary patellar resurfacing (1.1% vs. 0.9%). Predictors for primary patellar resurfacing were being female (OR 1.3) and younger (50–59 years, OR 1.4). The PS prosthesis design had a higher OR (4.1) than the CR design. Younger age (50–59 years, OR 1.5) and PS prosthesis (OR 2.7) were significant predictors of secondary patellar resurfacing. Particular surgical systems have a higher rate of primary and secondary patellar resurfacing.InterpretationLow rates of secondary patellar resurfacing in hospitals with a rare resurfacing regime indicate that this regime does not lead to more secondary patellar resurfacing then selective resurfacing. In the Dutch orthopedic community primary and secondary patellar resurfacing is associated with using a posterior stabilizing design, being younger, and using particular TKA systems.

Patellar resurfacing during primary total knee replacement is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery.

Debate remains whether the patella should be resurfaced during total knee replacement (TKR). For non-resurfaced TKRs, we estimated what the revision rate would have been if the patella had been resurfaced, and examined the risk of re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing. A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry (NJR) was performed. All primary TKRs for osteoarthritis alone performed between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016 were eligible (n = 842,072). Patellar resurfacing during TKR was performed in 36% (n = 305,844). The primary outcome was all-cause revision surgery. Secondary outcomes were the number of excess all-cause revisions associated with using TKRs without (versus with) patellar resurfacing, and the risk of re-revision after secondary patellar resurfacing. The cumulative risk of all-cause revision at ten years was higher (p < 0.001) in primary TKRs without patellar resurfacing (3.54% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47 to 3.62)) compared to those with resurfacing (3.00% (95% CI 2.91 to 3.11)). Using flexible parametric survival modelling, we estimated one 'excess' revision per 189 cases performed where the patella was not resurfaced by ten years (equivalent to 2,842 excess revisions in our cohort). The risk of all-cause re-revision following secondary patellar resurfacing was 4.6 times higher than the risk of revision after primary TKR with patellar resurfacing (at five years from secondary patellar resurfacing, 8.8% vs 1.9%). Performing TKR without patellar resurfacing was associated with an increased risk of revision. Secondary patellar resurfacing led to a high risk of re-revision. This represents a potential substantial healthcare burden that should be considered when forming treatment guidelines and commissioning services. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(5):864-871.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing in TKA: A Combined Analysis of Registry Data and Biomechanical Testing.

The German Arthroplasty registry (EPRD) has shown that different prosthesis systems have different rates of secondary patellar resurfacing: four years after implantation, the posterior-stabilized (PS) Vega prosthesis has a 3.2% risk of secondary patellar resurfacing compared to the cruciate-retaining (CR) Columbus prosthesis at 1.0% (both Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). We hypothesized that PS implants have increased retropatellar pressure and a decreased retropatellar contact area compared to a CR design, which may lead to an increased likelihood of secondary patellar resurfacing. Eight fresh frozen specimens (cohort 1) were tested with an established knee rig. In addition, a possible influence of the registry-based patient collective (cohort 2) was investigated. No significant differences were found in patient data–cohort 2-(sex, age). A generally lower number of PS system cases is noteworthy. No significant increased patella pressure could be detected with the PS design, but a lower contact area was observed (cohort 1). Lower quadriceps force (100°–130° flexion), increased anterior movement of the tibia (rollback), greater external tilt of the patella, and increasing facet pressure in the Vega PS design indicate a multifactorial cause for a higher rate of secondary resurfacing which was found in the EPRD patient cohort and might be related to the PS’ principle function.

Evaluating the “Patella-Friendly” Concept in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up Outcome Study Comparing Constant Radius, Multiradius Cruciate-Retaining, and Nonanatomical Cruciate-Retaining Implants

BackgroundPatella-friendly femoral components were developed in order to reduce anterior knee pain and patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but their effect on long-term outcome is still unclear. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from 3 groups consisting of 100 patients (100 knees in each). In group A, the constant radius a-MP, in group B the multiradius cruciate-retaining Genesis II, and in group C the nonanatomic, multiradius, cruciate-retaining AGC TKA was implanted. Patients of all groups were matched for age, gender, side, body mass index, and length of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome data in the form of Knee Society System (KSS), Short Form-12, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, and Oxford Knee Score were available at regular intervals for groups A and B. For patients of group C, KSS score data were available at the same time intervals. In all groups, the patellofemoral compartment was assessed using the Clinical Patella Score scale. Anterior knee pain, secondary patella resurfacing, implant failure, and radiological outcome were assessed in patients of all groups. ResultsAt 10-year and 15-year follow-up, patients of group A showed statistically significant (s.s.) higher (all P = .000) KSS values as compared to those of groups B and C. At 15-year follow-up, patients of group B showed s.s. higher (P = .001) KSS values as compared to those of group C. At 10-year and 15-year follow up, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (all P = .00) Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Oxford Knee Score values as compared to those of group B. At 15-year follow-up only, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (P = .00) Short Form-12 (physical) values as compared to those of group B. In terms of Clinical Patella Score, patients in group A had s.s. higher values (P = .05) when compared to those of groups B and C. Anterior knee pain was recorded in 4.4% of TKAs in group A, 7.5% in group B, and 17.2% in group C. One (1.1%) patient in group A, 3 (3.25%) in group B, and 7 (8%) in group C underwent secondary resurfacing. ConclusionAnatomical, patella-friendly, constant radius femoral components outperform others in reducing anterior knee pain and patella complications in TKA in which the patellae are left nonresurfaced.

No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties.

Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis. A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation. Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7months (1-17) postoperatively. There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

Patellar cartilage loss does not affect early outcomes of total knee arthroplasty performed without patella resurfacing

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the outcomes and cost economics of TKA without patella resurfacing in patients with and without patellar cartilage loss. MethodsProspective case control study of 209 consecutive patients undergoing TKA without patella resurfacing. Patella cartilage status was documented intra-operatively: 108 patients had patella cartilage loss (mean age 70 ± 9.7, mean BMI 31 ± 6.2, 72 (67%) female) and 101 control patients did not (age 68 ± 9.2, BMI 31 ± 5.6, 52 (51%) female). The primary outcome measure was Oxford Knee Score (OKS) improvement at one year. Secondary outcomes included OKS, EQ-5D, anterior knee pain (AKP), Kujala scores and reoperation at 2–4 years. The cost to prevent secondary patella resurfacing was calculated. ResultsThere were more women in the patella cartilage loss group (67% Vs 51%, p = 0.037), but no other preoperative characteristics differed. There was no difference in OKS improvement between those with and without patella cartilage loss at 1 year (mean difference −1.03, −3.68 to 1.62 95%CI, p = 0.446) or 2–4 years (mean difference 1.52, −1.43 to 4.45 95%CI, p = 0.310). At 2–4 years there was no difference in AKP (14/87 with vs 17/80 without, p = 0.430) nor Kujala score (mean difference 2.66, −3.82 to 9.13 95%CI, p = 0.418). Routine patella resurfacing would have cost £58,311 to prevent one secondary resurfacing. ConclusionThere was no difference in OKS, anterior knee pain, reoperation or Kujala scores up to 2–4 years between patients with and without patellar cartilage loss following TKA without patella resurfacing. Resurfacing for this indication would not have been a cost effective intervention.

Reasons for failure in primary total knee arthroplasty - An analysis of prospectively collected registry data

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the causes leading to a first revision of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a specialized knee centre and compare the results with previously published data. MethodsProspectively collected data of a consecutive number of 195 patients after primary TKA and who underwent first revision surgery after completing the diagnostic algorithm for persistent knee pain were included. Data was prospectively collected from a specialized knee centre in which the patients presented between 2015 and 2020 and retrospectively analysed. Indications for revision surgery were categorized using all available information from patients’ records. Patients were divided into early (up to two years) and late revision (more than two years). ResultsOverall mean time from index to revision surgery was 3.6 years. 49% of knee revisions occurred in the first two years, 51% after two years. 86% of the patients were referred to the knee centre from other surgeons. The most frequent reason for revision was instability, followed by patellofemoral problems, extensor mechanism insufficiency and malalignment. The most frequently performed revision was complete removal and re-implantation of a semi constrained implant design (52.5%) followed by revision using a full constrained implant design (16%). Secondary patella-resurfacing as part of complete revision was carried out in 71.5% of the cases. The majority of the patients showed concurrent reasons for TKA failure with significant correlations amongst another. Furthermore, correlations were identified between indications for revision surgery and revision implant designs. ConclusionIn a specialized knee centre the most common indications for the first TKA revision were instability and patellofemoral and/or extensor mechanism insufficiency followed by malalignment. In most patients there was not only one failure mode, but a combination of many. It is important to establish a standardized diagnostic algorithm to facilitate comprehensive and efficient diagnostics and the optimal treatment.

Is obesity associated with short-term revision after total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 121,819 primary procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

BackgroundThe prevalence of obesity is increasing. The association with knee osteoarthritis is well documented, resulting in the population requesting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for invalidating symptoms to be heavier in nature. The purpose of the current analysis was to assess the association between preoperative body mass index (BMI) and short-term revision rate after TKA. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of implant fixation method on the association between BMI and survivorship. MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data (Dutch Arthroplasty Register; LROI). All primary TKA procedures in patients >18 years of age with registered BMI were selected (n = 121,819). Non-obese patients (BMI 18–25) were compared with overweight (BMI 25–30) and class I–III obese (BMI >30, >35, >40) patients. Crude all-cause revision rates were calculated using competing risk analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox multivariable regression analyses for all-cause, septic and aseptic revision and secondary patellar resurfacing. ResultsRevision rates were 3.3% for non-obese patients, 3.5% for overweight patients, 3.7% for class I obese patients, 3.6% for class II obese patients and 3.7% for class III obese patients. Class III obese patients had a significant higher risk for septic revision compared with non-obese patients (HR 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.22). Class I obese patients had a higher risk for secondary patellar resurfacing (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12–2.08). All-cause and aseptic revision rates were similar between BMI groups. ConclusionsObesity appeared to be associated with some short-term revision risks after TKA, but was not associated with an overall increase in revision rate.