Second Year Of Medical School Research Articles

Building a Physician-Scientist Pathway for Underrepresented Medical Students Through a Summer Research Experience.

There is a need to increase the number of physician-scientists from underrepresented in medicine (URiM) groups. To engage URiM medical students, a committee of pediatric departmental leaders at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia created the Summer Underrepresented in Medicine Medical Student Research program. This 8-week, onsite research and clinical experience takes place during the summer between students' first and second years of medical school. Applications were solicited between 2019-2023 through nationwide outreach to medical school deans and members of URiM student organizations. Accepted students were assigned a mentor to lead their research and clinical exposure. A curriculum highlighting aspects of academic medicine was developed. Students received a $3,000-$5,500 stipend for in-person participation. In 2020 and 2021, adjustments were made (e.g., virtual programming) to avoid interruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the 2019-2023 application cycles, 298 students applied. Of 128 students who participated, 78 (61%) completed a postprogram survey. Students' survey feedback was positive. They indicated the program met expectations (mean rating = 1.3; scale: 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree). Students reported they learned valuable information/skills (mean = 1.3) and that participation was worth time spent away from other responsibilities (mean = 1.3). The 2019 cohort (n = 12) achieved a 100% residency match rate. In addition, 4 (33%) of these students reported they are obtaining additional degrees or are performing research. After the program, many mentors continued to include students in their research projects. Next steps include incorporating a standardized, scored rubric for selecting applicants; adding 3 lead mentors, an executive committee, and a faculty advisory board; establishing earlier pathway programming (e.g., at elementary and middle school levels); continuing to track/support alumni throughout their careers; and pursuing federal funding to expand the program.

Perceptions of undergraduate medical students on artificial intelligence in medicine: mixed-methods survey study from Palestine

BackgroundThe current applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine continue to attract the attention of medical students. This study aimed to identify undergraduate medical students’ attitudes toward AI in medicine, explore present AI-related training opportunities, investigate the need for AI inclusion in medical curricula, and determine preferred methods for teaching AI curricula.MethodsThis study uses a mixed-method cross-sectional design, including a quantitative study and a qualitative study, targeting Palestinian undergraduate medical students in the academic year 2022–2023. In the quantitative part, we recruited a convenience sample of undergraduate medical students from universities in Palestine from June 15, 2022, to May 30, 2023. We collected data by using an online, well-structured, and self-administered questionnaire with 49 items. In the qualitative part, 15 undergraduate medical students were interviewed by trained researchers. Descriptive statistics and an inductive content analysis approach were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.ResultsFrom a total of 371 invitations sent, 362 responses were received (response rate = 97.5%), and 349 were included in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 20.38 ± 1.97, with 40.11% (140) in their second year of medical school. Most participants (268, 76.79%) did not receive formal education on AI before or during medical study. About two-thirds of students strongly agreed or agreed that AI would become common in the future (67.9%, 237) and would revolutionize medical fields (68.7%, 240). Participants stated that they had not previously acquired training in the use of AI in medicine during formal medical education (260, 74.5%), confirming a dire need to include AI training in medical curricula (247, 70.8%). Most participants (264, 75.7%) think that learning opportunities for AI in medicine have not been adequate; therefore, it is very important to study more about employing AI in medicine (228, 65.3%). Male students (3.15 ± 0.87) had higher perception scores than female students (2.81 ± 0.86) (p < 0.001). The main themes that resulted from the qualitative analysis of the interview questions were an absence of AI learning opportunities, the necessity of including AI in medical curricula, optimism towards the future of AI in medicine, and expected challenges related to AI in medical fields.ConclusionMedical students lack access to educational opportunities for AI in medicine; therefore, AI should be included in formal medical curricula in Palestine.

Investigating the safety and feasibility of osteopathic manipulative medicine in hospitalized children and adolescent young adults with cancer.

Children and adolescents young adults (AYAs) undergoing treatment for oncologic diagnoses are frequently hospitalized and experience unwanted therapy-induced side effects that diminish quality of life. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a medical intervention that utilizes manual techniques to diagnose and treat body structures. Few studies have investigated the implementation of OMT in the pediatric oncology outpatient setting. To date, no studies have investigated the safety and feasibility of OMT in the pediatric oncology inpatient setting. The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of OMT in the pediatric oncology inpatient setting. This is a prospective, single-institution pilot study evaluating children and AYAs aged≥2 years to≤30 years with a diagnosis of cancer hospitalized at Riley Hospital for Children (RH) from September 2022 to July 2023. Approval was obtained from the Indiana University Institutional Review Board (IRB). Patients were evaluated daily with a history and physical examination as part of routine inpatient management. Patients who reported chemotherapy side effects commonly encountered and managed in the inpatient setting, such as pain, headache, neuropathy, constipation, or nausea, were offered OMT. Patients provided written informed consent/assent prior to receiving OMT. OMT was provided by trained osteopathic medical students under the supervision of a board-certified osteopathic physician and included techniques commonly taught in first- and second-year osteopathic medical school curricula. Safety was assessed by a validated pain (FACES) scale immediately pre/post-OMT and by adverse event grading per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 24 h post-OMT. All data were summarized utilizing descriptive statistics. A total of 11 patients were screened for eligibility. All patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. The majority of patients were male (n=7, 63.6 %) with a median age of 18.2 years at time of enrollment (range, 10.2-29.8 years). Patients had a variety of hematologic malignancies including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n=5, 45.5 %), T-cell ALL (n=1, 9.1 %), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n=2, 18.2 %), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2, 18.2 %), and Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=1, 9.1 %). All patients were actively undergoing cancer-directed therapy at the time of enrollment. There were 40 unique reasons for OMT reported and treated across 37 encounters, including musculoskeletal pain (n=23, 57.5 %), edema (n=7, 17.5 %), headache (n=5, 12.5 %), peripheral neuropathy (n=2, 5.0 %), constipation (n=2, 5.0 %), and epigastric pain not otherwise specified (n=1, 2.5 %). Validated FACES pain scores were reported in 27 encounters. Of the 10 encounters for which FACES pain scores were not reported, 8 encounters addressed lower extremity edema, 1 encounter addressed peripheral neuropathy, and 1 encounter addressed constipation. The total time of OMT was documented for 33 of the 37 encounters and averaged 9.8 min (range, 3-20 min). Hospitalized children and AYAs with cancer received OMT safely with decreased pain in their reported somatic dysfunction(s). These findings support further investigation into the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of implementing OMT in the pediatric oncology inpatient setting and to a broader inpatient pediatric oncology population.

How early clinical experiences in rural communities influence student learning about rural generalism considered through the lens of educational theory.

Rural communities have poorer health compared to urban populations due partly to having lesser healthcare access. Rural placements during medical education can equip students with the knowledge and skills to work in rural communities, and, it is hoped, increase the supply of rural physicians. It is unclear how students gain knowledge of rural generalism during placements, and how this can be understood in terms of place-based and/or sociocultural educational theories. To gain insight into these questions we considered the experiences of pre-clerkship medical students who completed two mandatory four-week rural placements during their second year of medical school. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews or focus groups, followed by thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. Rural placements allowed students to learn about rural generalism such as breadth of practice, and boundary issues. This occurred mainly by students interacting with rural physician faculty, with the effectiveness of precepting being key to students acquiring knowledge and skills and reporting a positive regard for the placement experience. Our data show the central role of generalist physician preceptors in how and what students learn while participating in rural placements. Sociocultural learning theory best explains student learning, while place-based education theory helps inform the curriculum. Effective training and preparation of preceptors is likely key to positive student placement experiences.

Development of a surgical skills course for preclinical medical students

BackgroundPreclinical students have limited exposure and training in surgical skills. As a result, many students report negative experiences during their surgery clerkship from a lack of confidence in their technical abilities and, thus, lower participation in cases. Moreover, in fields such as vascular surgery, where a shortage of physicians persists, the absence of surgery and field-specific exposure for medical students could limit recruitment. To address these gaps, we designed a surgical skills curriculum for preclinical medical students using surgical simulators to develop fundamental surgical skills, introduce students to vascular surgery early, and provide training on vascular surgery-specific procedures. We hypothesize that a surgical skills course can significantly enhance preclinical students' surgical abilities before they enter their surgical clerkship and increase interest in pursuing a surgical specialty. MethodsA total of 26 students took part in a structured surgical skills curriculum comprising three sections: fundamental surgical skills, application of skills in a clinical context, and a surgical skills competition. During the course of six workshops, the students received formative feedback from proctors using task-specific standardized rubrics and assessments through the Objective Standardized Assessment of Technical Skills. Additionally, students' attitudes and perceptions toward surgical training and vascular surgery were evaluated using the modified Vascular Surgery Interest Forum. The summative performance of the preclinical students enrolled in the surgical skills course was compared with their initial performance after the skills workshop and with that of third-year medical students who had completed surgical rotations. Differences in responses and attitudes were analyzed at the beginning and conclusion of the course using bivariate analysis. ResultsOf the 26 students, most were women (61.5%) and in their second year of medical school (76.9%). Also, 23.1% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine, 7.7% had physician family members, and 19.2% reported they had decided on a specialty. Following the knot-tying and suturing workshops, students reported a statistically significant increase in their self-rated understanding, comfort, and knowledge of tasks. Third-year medical students outperformed the preclinical students in knot-tying and instrument-tying tasks. However, no difference was found in the performance of these tasks between the third-year medical students and the top three preclinical students who completed the course. Both groups performed similarly on the anastomosis challenge (29.25 vs 28.42; P = .9) and the vascular simulation challenge (27.25 vs 26.83; P = .6). At the program's conclusion, the students demonstrated an increased mean interest in vascular surgery (from 2.3 ± 1.1 to 2.9 ± 1.2; P = .39), an enhanced interest in surgery due to its hands-on nature (from 4.5 ± 0.8 to 4.7 ± 0.6; P = .06), a preference for surgical simulation in teaching fundamental skills (from 3.7 ± 1.0 to 3.9 ± 0.8; P = .31), and an increased awareness of radiation exposure in surgical practice (from 2.5 ± 1.0 to 3.0 ± 1.3; P = .11). Students cited personality fit, exposure during medical school, and identification of a mentor as the most influential factors for pursuing a surgical career. The competitiveness of a residency program and resident workload and lifestyle were least influential. ConclusionsA structured surgical skills curriculum for preclinical medical students increased students' technical skills and fostered a greater appreciation for the hands-on and technical nature of surgery. Moreover, early exposure to vascular surgery enhanced their interest and knowledge of the field. Notably, students believed that medical school does not adequately prepare them for success on surgical rotations and emphasized the importance of personality fit, early exposure, and mentorship in considering a surgical career.

Predicting Medical Student Performance With a Situational Judgment Test in Admissions.

To explore correlations between AAMC situational judgment test (SJT) scores, other admissions data, and learners' medical school performance. First- and second-year medical students from 8 U.S. MD-granting medical schools completed a prototype version of the AAMC SJT in 2017. Outcomes included research-only faculty ratings of student performance, final course grades, and faculty evaluations of student performance, 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years. Bivariate correlations were used to investigate the relationship between SJT scores and student performance outcomes and hierarchical regressions to investigate whether SJT scores provided incremental validity over MCAT total scores and cumulative undergraduate grade point averages (UGPAs) for predicting student performance outcomes. In general, there were small positive correlations with research-only faculty ratings from the first year of medical school, with the highest for social skills/service orientation ( rcorrected = .33, P < .05). Correlations were higher, with the highest for social skills/service orientation and cultural competence ( rcorrected = .33 and .36, respectively, P < .05) in the second year in medical school. SJT scores improved prediction of research-only faculty ratings over MCAT total scores and UGPAs for reliability and dependability/capacity for improvement, cultural competence, social skills/service orientation, and the overall composite score in the first year and for resilience and adaptability, social skills/service orientation, cultural competence, and the overall composite score in the second year. SJT scores demonstrated small correlations with course grades ( rsample-weighted = .10, P = ns) and faculty evaluations related to professionalism skills ( rsample-weighted = .14, P < .05); however, MCAT total scores explained most of the variance associated with course outcomes. These studies provide initial evidence that SJT scores may add value to the medical school admissions process because scores were related to faculty ratings of professional behaviors and provided unique information relative to MCAT scores and UGPAs.

Teaching the Legacy of Slavery in American Medicine and Psychiatry to Medical Students: Feasibility, Acceptability, Opportunities for Growth.

Understanding the legacy of slavery in the United States is crucial for engaging in anti-racism that challenges racial health inequities' root causes. However, few medical educational curricula exist to guide this process. We created a workshop illustrating key historical themes pertaining to this legacy and grounded in critical race theory. During a preclinical psychiatry block, a second-year medical school class, divided into three groups of 50-60, attended the workshop, which comprised a 90-minute lecture, 30-minute break, and 60-minute small-group debriefing. Afterwards, participants completed an evaluation assessing self-reported knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and satisfaction with the workshop. One hundred eighty students watched the lecture, 15 attended small-group debriefings, and 132 completed the survey. Seventy-six percent (100) reported receiving no, very little, or some prior exposure to the legacy of slavery in American medicine and psychiatry. Over 80% agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop made them more aware of this legacy and that the artwork, photographs, storytelling, and media (videos) facilitated learning. Qualitative feedback highlighted how the workshop improved students' knowledge about the legacy of slavery's presence in medicine and psychiatry. However, students criticized the lecture's scripted approach and requested more discussion, dialogue, interaction, and connection of this history to anti-racist action they could engage in now. Though this workshop improved awareness of the legacy of slavery, students criticized its structure and approach. When teaching this legacy, medical schools should consider expanding content, ensuring opportunities for discussion in safe spaces, and connecting it to immediate anti-racist action.

Anxiety in Medical Students: A Moroccan Overview

Introduction: The mental health of medical students as a subject of interest in the scientific community appears to have emerged in the literature from the 1950s. Despite the divergence on the stressful nature of medical studies, students appear to be confronted with a multitude of stress-inducing factors. Notwithstanding their high levels of distress, only a few medical students seem to seek professional help, mainly due to "self-stigmatization". Results: A total of 239 medical students of the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat completed the questionnaire. 87% of students reported a history of anxiety symptoms since the beginning of their medical studies, with 57.7% having three or more areas of concern. Age and the years of study were associated with the emergence of anxiety symptoms. The second year of medical school was the only found risk factor for the presence of anxiety symptoms. Conclusions: Within medical students, anxiety appears to be particularly widespread. It causes psychological distress, which has repercussions on well-being, academic performance, and also the quality of care provided. Awareness campaigns should be one of the main focuses of both Moroccan and worldwide public health programs and healthcare professionals to promote the mental health of future caregivers.

Investigating the Skill Development of Medical Students in Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Ultrasound: A Comparative Analysis Across Different Stages of Medical Training.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) ultrasound (US) is a valuable medical examination used in trauma settings, particularly for rapid responses to events such as natural disasters. Although the efficacy and benefits of FAST in patient care have been extensively studied, there is limited research on training medical students in FAST. Previous studies have found that medical students can proficiently perform a FAST US after two days of training. However, these studies exclusively included first-year medical students without considering variations in their medical knowledge. Particularly, the advantage of medical students having US experience before undergoing FAST training has not been previously examined. Assess the performance and knowledge acquisition of medical students with and without prior US experience after completing a FAST training course. The study included a total of 71 students, consisting of 33 males and 38 females, who were between the ages of 18 and 31, with an average age of 24.6 and a standard deviation of 2.4. The inclusion criteria targeted first- and second-year medical school students who participated on a volunteer basis. Students were divided into two groups: group A, consisting of those without prior USexperience, and group B, made up of those who had previous US experience. All students completed a pre-training survey to share their comfort and confidence in US use and knowledge. A baseline FAST exam was conducted to establish initial performance. A comprehensive three-hour training session was then provided. Post-training, students performed another FAST exam to assess improvement, followed by a post-training survey to evaluate comfort and confidence. Medical students who had prior experience in the US (group B) performed significantly better (p<0.01) in both the pre- and post-training FAST exams when compared to students without previous US experience. Specifically, in locating the liver, right kidney, hepatorenal recess, and left kidney, as well as detecting fluid accumulation when in a supine position. Additionally, medical students with prior US experience (group B) exhibited higher baseline confidence (p<0.005-p<0.01) in their ability to perform a FAST exam, as indicated by the results of the pre-testing survey. Previous experience with USsignificantly boosted confidence and knowledge gains following FAST training. This emphasizes the value of including US training in medical school programs after earlier exposure, offering evident benefits. The study reveals the unexplored benefit of having prior US experience for medical students undergoing FAST training, thus addressing a previously unexplored area in current research. The conclusions stress the necessity of integrating US training into medical school curricula after initial exposure. This understanding can direct medical educators in refining the education process, enabling students to be better equipped for real-world medical situations involving FAST.

Preclinical Immersion Experiences Improve Medical Student Perceptions of Surgery

IntroductionMedical students historically receive little to no preclinical exposure to surgery and surgical subspecialties. As a result, by the time they reach their clinical clerkship time, students often have already found interest in other specialties. The goal of this study is to utilize the knowledge to action (KTA) implementation framework to design and refine a clinical immersion experience during the second year of medical school. MethodsA total of 94 second-year Harvard Medical School students underwent the surgical immersion experience between 2019 and 2022 (the program was postponed in 2020 due to COVID). The development and refinement of the curriculum were nicely modeled by the KTA implementation framework. We identified a gap in medical student preclinical education, adapted a curriculum for preclinical medical students at Massachusetts General Hospital , selected the curriculum components to provide a high-level overview of surgery, monitored the student experience, and evaluated outcomes using the student surveys. Based on the survey results, inductive thematic analysis was utilized to identify prominent positive and negative themes. The feedback was then used to tailor subsequent iterations of the immersion experience. ResultsEighty-eight medical students completed the survey (RR = 93.6%), and 85% rated the immersion experience as “excellent”, 11% “very good”, 4% “good”, and 0% “fair” or “poor”. There was no significant difference in ratings between sessions. Several key themes were identified, including changed perceptions, diversity of surgical fields, teamwork, surgery clerkship preparedness, and the need for more preclinical exposure. ConclusionsPreclinical medical students gave overwhelmingly positive reviews of the surgical immersion experience. A half-day intervention is sufficient to begin changing students’ views toward surgery, disproving stereotypes, and even inspiring some to consider a surgical field themselves. In addition, the KTA implementation framework is a useful model for the development and refinement of medical education curricula.

Integrating High-Value Care Concepts into Preclinical Medical Education: A Practical Approach.

Although some US medical schools have incorporated high-value care into their preclinical curriculum, there is no standardized approach and major curricular overhaul can be prohibitively onerous. The objectives of this study were to develop a feasible and effective high-value care curriculum, integrate it into an existing pre-clinical course, and assess student and faculty perceptions of the educational value of the curriculum. Between 2019 and 2021, University of Vermont preclinical medical students participating in the Students & Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) program collaborated with the faculty director of the preclinical pathophysiology course to identify Choosing Wisely® recommendations relevant to course topics. For each recommendation, STARS students created a case-based, multiple-choice question, answer key and rationale to accompany standard course materials. At each year's course completion, participating students and faculty were invited to complete a survey to assess their perceptions of the curriculum. Seventeen case-based questions were integrated into existing pathophysiology course sessions each year. Over the 3-year period, 420 students and 35 teaching faculty participated in the course, and 171 (40.7%) students and 24 (68.6%) faculty completed the post-course survey. Among student respondents, 80% agreed the curriculum increased their awareness of high-value care, 79% agreed they would be more likely to apply high-value care concepts during their medical career, and 92% agreed it was valuable to discuss Choosing Wisely® recommendations during the second year of medical school. A student-led initiative to incorporate high-value care content within an existing pre-clinical course was well-received by medical students, who reported increased awareness of and intention to apply high-value care principles. This model may offer a feasible and effective approach to high-value care education in the absence of an extensive formal curriculum.

Frequency of Student Resource Use and Academic Performance in Preclerkship Education: A Survey Study

Medical students have unprecedented access to a large variety of learning resources, but patterns of resource use, differences in use across education cohorts, and the relationship between resource use and academic performance are unclear. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate student resource use and its relationship to academic performance during preclerkship years. First-year and second-year medical students completed a 10-question electronic survey that assessed likelihood of using outside resources recommended by others, reasons for using outside resources, frequency of use of resources, and use of outside resources for specific disciplines. Outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts of students. First-year students were more likely to use instructor-produced resources and self-generated study resources, and second-year students were more likely to use board review resources. Although differences were found between cohorts for frequency of use of certain resources, correlations between resource use and academic performance were modest. Overall, our results indicated that student use of study resources changed between the first and second years of medical school. These results suggest opportunities for medical educators to guide students in the selection and effective use of outside resources as they mature as self-regulated learners. Further, since students seem to extensively use external resources for learning, institutions should consider calibrating their curriculum and teaching methods to this learning style and providing high-quality, accessible resource materials for all students to reduce the potential impact of socioeconomic factors on student performance.

Interviewing Teen Parents: Simulated Patient Experience for Clinical Education and Outreach.

Many medical students' initial experience obtaining a history from a pediatric patient happens in their clerkship years. There is a shift in medical education to provide early clinical experiences to train physicians. To increase the exposure to pediatric history in the pre-clinical years, we developed this simulation-based session involving students in their second year of medical school. They are tasked with eliciting a history from a babyprovided by a teenager who functions both as a standardized patient (SP)and the parent of the infant. Our goal was to have second-year medical students learn and practice interviewing an adolescent while obtaining history about an infant to assist in the transition to Year three Pediatric clerkship. Collaborating with the Office of Diversity at our medical school, we recruited students registered in medical academies in public middle and high schools in our county and asked them to be part of this simulation-based activity. A majority of these medical academy students are underrepresented in medicine (URiM). The students functioned as SPs for pre-clerkship medical studentswhile gaining exposure to a career in medicine and the medical school environment. The medical students obtained a history, with faculty providing formative feedback, followed by documentation of the encounter. Medical students felt they gained skills to communicate with caregivers of pediatric patients. They also practiced the skill of eliciting a pediatric history from an infant whose parent is a teenager. The middle and high school students that functioned as SPs gained a better appreciation for the medical education systemand felt that the experience was valuable for all parties involved. This session exposed pre-clerkship medical students to the nuances of eliciting a pediatric history from pediatric caregiverswhile also engaging URiM from middle and high school in the medical education process. This session could be used at other institutions to expand diversity in the medical fieldwhile also providing pre-clerkship medical students with pediatric experiences. This article was previously presented as an oral presentation at the AAMC Group on Education Affairs (GEA) Virtual Regional Spring Meeting on April 21, 2021.

Impact of an in-person small group surgical skills course for preclinical medical students in an era of increased e-learning

ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic decrease in face-to-face teaching. This can particularly impact medical students' skills development. This prompted development of an in-person surgical skills course as guided by the General Medical Council "Outcomes for Graduates" facilitated by tutors with surgical experience. This study aimed to primarily assess participant confidence in surgical skills following the course. DesignThis was an interventional study assessing both qualitative and quantitative data collected prior to, during, and post course completion. Data were collected from students via online forms, which included a mixture of "Yes/No" responses, self-assessed confidence levels via Likert scales, and free type questions. SettingThe study assessed feedback for a 5-session surgical skills course delivered at the authors' institution. This is a newly designed course using low-cost materials which was free for all attendees. ParticipantsParticipants were all in the first or second year of medical school. There was capacity for 60 students, and all attendees provided informed consent to participate. ResultsA total of 446 students applied for the course with 58 participants in the final study, 31% of whom had prior surgical skills experience. There was a statistically significant increase in student confidence levels following the course for all taught surgical skills (P = .0001). Participants were also more confident that they possessed the skills required for clinical placements (P = .0001) and to work as a junior doctor (P = .01). Thematic qualitative analysis revealed a reliance on third parties for previous surgical experience; this course improved knowledge and skills for future practice. Limitations included session duration and equipment choice. ConclusionThis study demonstrates high demand and student satisfaction from this course, offering a potential framework to improve undergraduate surgical skills teaching. The results presented here have the potential to inform wider curricula development across medical schools in the future. CompetenciesMedical knowledge; practice-based learning and Improvement.

The Influence of the STORM Program and Other Elective Experiences During the Summer Between the First and Second Year on Medical Students' Career Interests.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the Summer Training Option in Rural Medicine (STORM) program and other elective experiences during the summer between the first and second pre-clerkship years of medical school on medical students’ career intentions.MethodsA retrospective voluntary and anonymous cohort study was conducted by distributing an email survey to the 211 second-year medical students at the University of Kansas School of Medicine (KUSM). The survey consisted of a variety of questions regarding their recent summer break elective experiences.ResultsEighty-nine students (42.2% response rate) completed the survey; 21 respondents participated in the STORM program. Important factors influencing the choice of an elective included, working one-on-one with an educator, hands-on experiences, and receiving academic credit. Sixty-seven respondents (75.3%) concluded that their experience met their expectations, 50 (56.2%) concluded that their experience helped solidify their career goals, while 20 (22.5%) concluded that their experience made them question their career goals. Eleven respondents (12.4%) wished they had participated in a different summer experience, and 16 respondents (18.0%) changed their career plans after their summer experience.ConclusionsA break between first and second years of medical school allowed students to explore career options; such experiences may ignite a particular passion, solidify an already determined specialty choice, or dissuade a student from pursuing a particular career pathway. Medical school affirmation of the importance of significant, sustained, and student-chosen opportunities to work one-on-one with a mentor and engage in hands-on learning during the pre-clerkship years is crucial. The STORM program was one elective option that delivered on students’ expectations.

Comparing In-person vs. Live-streamed Osteopathic Manual Medicine Lab Instruction

Abstract Context Practicing osteopathic manual medicine (OMM) requires medical students to learn a unique psychomotor skill. OMM techniques are taught during hands-on laboratory sessions in osteopathic medical schools across the country. Determining the optimal delivery of OMM training in the first and second years of medical school is instrumental in maximizing student engagement and confidence for future use in practice. In the academic year of 2020–2021, public health guidelines for COVID-19 forced Des Moines University College of Osteopathic Medicine to restructure their OMM laboratory sessions to include in-person and live-stream demonstrations of somatic dysfunction diagnoses and treatments. Objective(s) To determine if there was a difference in students’ perception of the learning experience and exam performance between in-person and live-streamed osteopathic manual medicine (OMM) laboratory instruction. Methods An online 8-question survey was sent to 225 first year medical students from Des Moines University at the end of their first year. The survey contained a combination of Likert scale, dichotomous, and open-ended questions. Statistical analysis for the Likert scale questions included paired-t test given the nature of correlated responses by the same cohort of students. A non-parametric permutation test was used to compare Fall 2020 practical exam grades due to the heavy skewness and ties of the exam score distributions. All computations were also made using the statistical computing software R. Free text was qualitatively analyzed for recurrent themes. Results The survey response rate was 67.1% with 151 respondents. When students were asked to rate their learning experience (engagement, comfort asking questions, understanding of material, ability to retain and recall lab material) between in-person vs. live-stream delivery of OMM lab material on a 5-point Likert Scale, there was a statistically significant mean difference for all of the responses, indicating a preference for in-person delivery method. Comparisons of the mean practical exam scores revealed no statistically significant differences. When asked to choose between in-person vs. live-stream, 83% of students reported a preference for in-person OMM laboratory demonstrations. Conclusion The students’ perceptions suggest that in-person delivery of OMM was superior to live-stream instruction based on higher rankings of engagement, comfort in asking questions, understanding material to practice, and recall of material in preparation of practical exams.

Medical student confidence when training for a female genitourinary exam using models and standardized patients.

The purpose of this study is to investigate what factors make students feel confident and competent when performing a female genitourinary exam (FGUE) with normal, nonpathologic findings. We anticipated that students would increase their confidence and perceived competence from the first year to the second year of medical school, would prefer the use of specialized standardized patients (SSPs) over models, and that the results would vary by student demographics. Student confidence and perceived competence were measured using voluntary survey methods pre- and postinterventions. Interventions were defined as learning the FGUE on models alone for first-year medical students and learning the FGUE on SSPs with prior experience using models for second-year students. Survey responses were evaluated via generalized linear mixed models for numeric responses. The results demonstrated that first- and second-year medical students of racial and ethnic minorities rated themselves as more confident and competent than Caucasian counterparts, which was in many cases more extensive than the effect of an additional year of medical education. Students felt that using SSPs alone was the best mode of learning the exam than either models alone or the combination of models and SSPs. Students' current specialty of choice did not correlate with increased confidence or perceived competence. This study highlights how cultural differences have an impact on confidence and perceived competence in medical students as they prepare for performing a procedure as intimate to the patient as the FGUE.

Growth in basic science knowledge in first-year medical school and USMLE Step 1 results: a longitudinal investigation at one school.

Our US medical school uses National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) tests as progress tests during the pre-clerkship curriculum to assess students. In this study, we examined students' growth patterns using progress tests in the first year of medical school to identify students at risk for failing United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1. Growth Mixture Modeling (GMM) was used to examine the growth trajectories based on NBME progress test scores in the first year of medical school. Achieving a passing score on the USMLE Step 1 at the end of the second year of medical school was used as the distal outcome, controlling for Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) scores and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status. A total of 518 students from a US medical school were included in the analysis. Five different growth patterns were identified based on students' NBME test results. Seventy-eight students identified in Group 1 had the lowest starting NBME test score (mean = 33.6, 95% CI 32.0-35.2) and lowest growth rate (mean = 2.30, 95% CI 2.06-2.53). All 26 students who failed Step 1 at the end of the second year were in Group 1 (failing rate = 33%). Meanwhile Group 4 (n = 65 students) had moderate starting NBME test scores (mean = 37.9, 95% CI 36.3-39.0) but the highest growth rate with mean slope at 6.07 (95% CI 5.40-6.73). This group of students achieved significant higher USMLE Step1 scores comparing with the 3 other groups of students (P < 0.05). Our study found students had heterogeneous growth patterns in progress test results in their first year of medical school. Growth patterns were highly predictive of USMLE step 1 results. This study can provide performance benchmarks for our future students to assess their progress and for medical educators to identify students who need support and guidance.

Weekly near-peer tutoring sessions improve students’ performance on basic medical sciences and USMLE Step1 examinations

Purpose This study examined the relationship between attendance at weekly near-peer tutoring (NPT) sessions offered in the second year of medical school and academic performance on basic science and USMLE Step 1 examinations. Methods Twenty-four weekly NPT sessions were delivered across all modules in the second year of medical school. Attendance of the sessions was recorded and students were divided into three groups: high (16–24 sessions), moderate (7–15 sessions), and low-no (0–6 sessions) attendance groups. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was computed to determine the relationship between students’ frequency of attendance and their performance on overall basic sciences, two NBME CBSEs, and USMLE Step 1 examinations. Students’ academic performance was also analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05) to compare differences between the three groups. Results Pearson correlation analyses revealed that attending peer tutoring sessions was significantly correlated with students’ performance in overall basic sciences, CBSE mid-year, CBSE final, and USMLE Step 1 examinations. The high attendance groups significantly outperformed the low-no attendance groups on overall basic sciences (p = 0.007), CBSE mid-year (p < 0.001), CBSE final (p < 0.018), and USMLE Step 1 (p = 0.048) examinations. Conclusions Attending NPT sessions are significantly correlated with students’ performance on basic sciences and on USMLE Step1 examinations. Attendance of weekly NPT sessions is a valuable experience for M2 students.

Assessment of medical student burnout: toward an implicit measure to address current issues.

The feasibility of implicitly assessing medical student burnout was explored, using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), to measure longitudinal student burnout over the first two years of medical school and directly comparing it with an existing explicit measure of burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory; MBI). Three successive cohorts of medical students completed both implicit and explicit measures of burnout at several time points during their first two years of medical school. Both assessments were conducted via the internet within a one-week period during the first week of medical school, the end of the first year of medical school, and the end of the second year, though not all cohorts were able to complete the assessments at all time points. Mixed linear models were used to compare the two measures directly, as well as to evaluate changes over time in each measure separately. Minimal correspondence was observed between the implicit and explicit measures of burnout on a within-subject basis. However, when analyzed separately, all subscales of both measures detected significant change over time in the direction of greater levels of burnout, particularly during the first year of medical school. These results provide preliminary evidence the IRAP is able to assess implicit attitudes related to burnout among medical students, though additional research is needed. The IRAP detected consistent improvements in positive implicit attitudes toward medical training during students' second year of medical school, which was not detected by the MBI. Possible implications of these findings are discussed.