Cesarean Delivery In Second Stage Research Articles

Impacted fetal head extraction methods at second stage cesarean and subsequent preterm delivery: A multicenter study.

Second-stage cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with subsequent preterm birth (PTB). It has been suggested that an increased risk of PTB after second-stage cesarean delivery could be linked to a higher chance of cervical injury due to the extension of the uterine incision. Previous studies have shown that reverse breech extraction is associated with lower rates of uterine incision extensions compared to the "push" method. We aimed to investigate the association between the method of fetal extraction during second-stage CD and the rate of spontaneous PTB (sPTB), as well as other maternal and neonatal outcomes during the subsequent pregnancy. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included women in their first subsequent singleton delivery following a second-stage CD between 2004 and 2021. The main exposure of interest was the method of fetal extraction in the index CD ("push" method vs. reverse breech extraction). The primary outcome of this study was sPTB <37 weeks in the subsequent pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were overall PTB, trial of labor, and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. During the study period, 2969 index CD during second stage were performed, of those 583 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 234 (40.1%) had fetal extraction using the reverse breech extraction method, while 349 (59.9%) had the "push" method for extraction. In univariate analysis, women in those two groups had statistically similar rates of sPTB (3.7% vs. 3.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% CI: 0.49-3.19) and overall PTB (<37, <34 and <32 weeks), as well as other maternal, neonatal, and trial of labor outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariate analyses with an adjusted OR of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.43-3.71) for sPTB. Among women with a previous second-stage CD, no significant difference was observed in PTB rates in the subsequent pregnancies following the "push" method compared to the reverse breech extraction method.

Failed vacuum and preterm delivery risk in the subsequent pregnancy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Second-stage cesarean delivery is associated with subsequent preterm delivery. Failed vacuum-assisted delivery is a subgroup of second-stage cesarean delivery in which the fetal head is engaged deeper in the pelvis and, thus, is associated with an increased risk of short-term maternal complications. This study aimed to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women at their subsequent delivery after a second-stage cesarean delivery with failed vacuum-assisted extraction vs after a second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted extraction. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included all women in their subsequent pregnancy after a second-stage cesarean delivery who delivered in all university-affiliated obstetrical centers (n=4) in a single geographic area between 2003 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who had second-stage cesarean delivery after a failed vacuum-assisted delivery were compared with women who had second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted delivery. The primary outcome of this study was preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were vaginal birth rate and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. During the study period, 1313 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 215 (16.4%) had a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery at the previous delivery and 1098 (83.6%) did not. In univariate analysis, women with previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery had similar preterm delivery rates (<37, <34, <32, and <28 weeks of gestation), a successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery rates, uterine rupture, and hysterectomy. However, multivariable analyses controlling for confounders showed that a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery is associated with a higher risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.79; P=.02), but not with preterm delivery at <34 or <32 weeks of gestation. Among women with a previous second-stage cesarean delivery, previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation in the subsequent birth.

Unintended uterine extension at the time of cesarean delivery – risk factors and associated adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes

Objective To identify risk factors, maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes related to unintended lower segment uterine extension during cesarean delivery (CD). Methods A retrospective cohort analysis in a single, university-affiliated medical center between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. All singleton pregnancies delivered by CD were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify maternal and obstetrical predictors for uterine extension during CD. For secondary outcomes, we assessed the correlation between uterine extension and any adverse maternal or neonatal outcome. Risk factors were analyzed using ROC statistics to measure their prediction performance for a uterine extension. Results Overall, 1746 (19.3%) CDs were performed during the study period. Of them, 121 (6.9%) CDs were complicated by unintended uterine extension. There was no difference in maternal demographics and clinical data stratified by uterine extension at CD. Uterine extensions were significantly more common following induction of labor, intrapartum fever, premature rupture of membranes, a trial of labor after cesarean, advanced gestational age, emergent CD, and in particular CD during the second stage of labor (37.2% vs. 6.5%) and after failed vacuum extraction (6.6% vs. 1.1%), p < .05 for all. The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and re-laparotomy did not differ between the groups. Most of the extensions were caudal-directed (40.4%), and were closed by a two-layer closure (92%). Mean extension size was 4.5 ± 1.7 cm. Using multivariable analysis, the only factor that remained significant was CD at the second stage of labor (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 54.2, 95% CI 4.5–648.9, p = .002), with an area under the ROC curve 0.653 (95% CI 0.595–0.712, p < .001). Emergent CD, body mass index, birth weight, failed vacuum attempt, and trial of labor after cesarean were not significant. For secondary outcomes, an unintended uterine extension was associated with longer operation time, higher estimated blood loss, greater pre- to post-CD hemoglobin difference, increased blood products transfusion, puerperal fever, and longer hospital stay. No clinically significant neonatal adverse outcomes were observed. Conclusions In our cohort, second-stage CD was the strongest predictor for an unintended uterine extension. Following uterine extension, women had increased infectious and blood-loss morbidity.

Second-stage cesarean delivery and preterm birth in subsequent pregnancy: A large multi-institutional cohort study

Objective: To estimate the risk of preterm birth associated with mode of delivery in a previous pregnancy.Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Women who had two consecutive deliveries in the participating hospitals between January 2012 and January 2022 were included in this study. They were divided into three groups according to the mode of delivery in a previous pregnancy: vaginal birth (group A), cesarean section before the second stage of labor (group B), and second stage cesarean section (group C). Data were extracted from the medical records. The primary outcome was the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. The secondary outcomes were the risk of early spontaneous preterm birth (< 34 weeks) and the medically indicated preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. The logistic regression was employed to estimate odds and adjust for confounders.Results: 18,253 women were included. Among them, 10,951 women were in group A, 5111 women in group B, and 2191 women in group C. The rates of spontaneous preterm birth in groups A, B, and C were 5.5%, 7.3%, and 15.1%, respectively. The rates of early spontaneous preterm birth in groups A, B, and C were 2.3%, 3.4%, and 8.2%, respectively. When compared with vaginal birth, second-stage cesarean section significantly increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (aOR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.02–5.17; P = 0.003) and early spontaneous preterm birth (aOR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.01–5.19; P <0.001) in the subsequent pregnancy. The rates of medically indicated preterm birth in groups A, B, and C were 2.3%, 2.8%, and 2.2%, respectively. There was no statistical difference across the three groups.Conclusion: History of cesarean section at full dilation is independently associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy.

The impact of physical activity during pregnancy on labor and delivery

Physical activity in pregnancy is associated with decreased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. However, the relationship between the amount and type of physical activity during pregnancy and subsequent labor outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that higher levels of physical activity across different lifestyle domains in pregnancy are associated with a shorter duration of labor. This study is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in which patients with singleton pregnancies without a major fetal anomaly were administered the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey in each trimester. The Kaiser Physical Activity Survey was designed specifically to quantify various types of physical activities in women and includes 4 summative indices-housework/caregiving, active living habits, sports, and occupation. The study included women at full-term gestations admitted for induction of labor or spontaneous labor. The primary outcome of this analysis was duration of the second stage of labor. Secondary outcomes were duration of the active stage, prolonged first and second stage, mode of delivery, rates of second-stage cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, severe perineal lacerations, and postpartum hemorrhage. These outcomes were compared between patients with and without high physical activity levels, defined as overall Kaiser Physical Activity Survey score ≥75th percentile in the third trimester. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for obesity and epidural use. In addition, a subgroup analysis of nulliparous patients was performed. A total of 811 patients with complete Kaiser Physical Activity Survey data in the third trimester were included in this analysis. The median Kaiser Physical Activity Survey score was 9.5 (8.2-10.8). Of the 811 patients, 203 (25%) had higher levels of physical activity in pregnancy. There was no difference in the duration of the second stage of labor between patients with and without higher physical activity levels (1.29±2.94 vs 0.97±2.08 hours; P=.15). The duration of active labor was significantly shorter in patients with higher levels of physical activity (5.77±4.97 vs 7.43±6.29 hours; P=.01). Patients with higher physical activity levels were significantly less likely to have a prolonged first stage (9.8% vs 19.4%; P<.01; adjusted relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.83). However, rates of prolonged second-stage cesarean delivery, operative vaginal deliveries, and perineal lacerations were similar between the 2 groups. Patients who are more physically active during pregnancy have a shorter duration of active labor.

Committee Opinion No. 415: Impacted Fetal Head, Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery.

To review the most effective clinical approaches to disengage an impacted fetal head during cesarean delivery. Women who undergo cesarean delivery of an infant with a deeply impacted head. The "push" technique (from below) or the "pull" technique (reverse breech extraction). Proper management of this clinical scenario can reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Using an evidence-informed approach when an impacted fetal head is anticipated has the potential to reduce maternal and fetal complications and short- and long-term harm and their associated costs. Research into the value of simulation learning, regular labour assessments, and team preparedness for possible interventions will help inform quality care. The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane for the publication period 2012-2019: • 'Guidelines' 'manual' • 'Caesarean Section' • 'full dilation' • 'operative delivery' • 'impacted head' • 'Caesarean' AND 'full dilation' AND 'impacted head' • 'Caesarean' AND 'second stage of labour' OR 'second stage' AND 'impacted head' • 'Caesarean' OR 'operative delivery' AND 'impacted head' A total of 32 articles were retrieved and 24 were deemed appropriate to include as references. Many of these articles represented expert opinion. Randomized controlled trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in settings that limit the generalizability of their findings to the Canadian population.20 INTENDED USERS: Intrapartum health care providers.

Risk for complications in the subsequent pregnancy following first versus second-stage cesarean delivery: 25 years follow-up in a large cohort

Background Cesarean delivery is a prevalent procedure worldwide, and an established risk factor for subsequent pregnancies. Aims To examine if a prior cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor carries different risk profiles for adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study, based on data accumulated over the years 1988–2013 at the Soroka University Medical Center. We compared pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes in subsequent delivery following a cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed. Results There were 3828 subsequent deliveries of patients who underwent prior cesarean delivery due to first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, 2791 (72.91%) and 1037 (27.09%), respectively. Patients with a prior cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor were more likely to have hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (7.4% vs 3.8% in first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p = .002), and repeated cesarean delivery at the subsequent pregnancy (70% vs 62% in first vs. second stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p < .001). Patients with prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor were more likely to have preterm birth (10% vs 6.8% in second vs. first stage non-progressive labor, respectively, p = .001). Prior cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor was independently associated with a recurrent cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. In addition, prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor was independently associated with preterm birth. Conclusions Cesarean delivery due to first stage non-progressive labor carries higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and recurrent cesarean delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Prior cesarean delivery due to second stage non-progressive labor carries higher rates of subsequent preterm birth.

Neonatal outcome of second-stage cesarean delivery versus vacuum extraction among neonates

Objective Among deliveries <34 weeks, there is inconclusive evidence regarding the preferred route of delivery when there is a need to expedite delivery during the second stage of labor. As it is unreasonable that future randomized controlled trials will be conducted to settle this query, every clinical data concerning this topic, may be helpful. We aim to compare neonatal outcomes among women undergoing emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) versus vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) during the second stage of labor among singleton gestations <34 weeks. Methods A retrospective cohort study including all women who underwent either ECD or VAD at the second stage of labor between 30°/7 and 336/7 weeks, during 2011–2019. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse neonatal outcomes, defined as intrapartum death, mechanical ventilation, asphyxia, respiratory distress syndrome, subgaleal hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and phototherapy. Results Of the 153,672 live singleton deliveries during the study period, 2871 (1.9%) delivered before 34°/7. Of those 1674 (58.3%) delivered vaginally unassisted and 1137 (39.6%) delivered by a CD during the first stage of labor. A total of 60 deliveries were analyzed, with a median gestational age of 32 weeks, interquartile range (IQR) 31–33. Median birth weight at delivery was 1845 g, IQR 1574–2095. Overall 25 (42%) of women were delivered by VAD and 35 by CD (58%). Indications for expeditious delivery did not differ between the study groups. Neonates delivered by VAD had a higher median birth weight (1940 vs. 1620 g, p = .02). Second stage of labor was longer in the ECD group as compared to the VAD group (median 200 vs. 52 min, p = .01). The rate of Apgar score at 1 min <7 was higher among the CD group (10 (40%) vs. 5 (14%), OR [95% CI]: 4.0 (1.1–13.8), p = .03). Longer length of stay was evident in the CD group as compared to the VAD group (median 30 vs. 21 days, p = .001). The rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was comparable between the study groups. Adverse outcomes were associated with lower body mass index (median 27.7 vs. 34.9, p = .04), higher rate of premature preterm rupture of membranes (40 (91%) vs. 5 (31%), OR [95% CI]: 22.0 (5.0–91.1), p < .001) and labor dystocia as the indication for expedited delivery (38 (86%) vs. 7 (44%), OR [95% CI]: 8.1 (2.1–30.1), p = .001). Conclusions Cesarean delivery during the second stage of labor of gestations <34 weeks was associated with a higher rate of lower Apgar scores and longer length of stay. Synopsis Delivery by second stage CD of premature neonates <34 weeks is associated with a higher rate of lower Apgar score.

Caesarean Delivery in the Second Stage: Incidence, Effect, and How to Address Rising Rates

Objective: The aim of this research was to determine the rate and effects of second-stage cesarean delivery at a tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study rev...

Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching

Operative vaginal delivery and, in particular, rotational forceps delivery require extensive training, specific skills, and dexterity. Performed correctly, it can reduce the need for difficult late second-stage cesarean delivery and its associated complications. When rotation to occiput anterior position is achieved, pelvic trauma and anal sphincter injury commonly associated with direct delivery from occiput posterior positions may be avoided. We report the original and novel use of real-time intrapartum ultrasound simultaneously during Kielland's rotational forceps delivery to monitor correct execution and increase maternal safety. This is a prospective observational study performed at the Charité University Hospital in Berlin between 2013 and 2018. Simultaneous, real-time, intrapartum suprapubic ultrasound during Kielland's rotational forceps deliveries were performed in a series of laboring women with normal fetuses and arrest of labor in the late second stage and with a fetal head malposition, requiring operative vaginal delivery. In addition to vaginal palpation for head station, rotation, and asynclitism, intrapartum ultrasound was also used to objectively determine head station, head direction, and midline angle. The operator was not blinded to the ultrasound findings. The delivering obstetrician examined the woman and performed the delivery. An assistant, trained in intrapartum ultrasound, placed a curved-array transducer transversely in the midline just above the pubic bone to display the forceps blades being applied and the rotation of the fetal head in occiput anterior position. In all 32 laboring women included in the study, the blades were applied correctly and the fetal heads successfully rotated to an occiput anterior position with direct ultrasound confirmation, and vaginal delivery was achieved. There were no cases of difficult application, repeat application, slippage of the blades, or rotation of the fetal head in the wrong direction. Maternal outcomes showed no vaginal tears, cervical tears, or postpartum hemorrhage >500 mL. There was 1 case of third-degree perineal tear (3a). Neonatal outcomes included mild hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), small cephalohematoma conservatively managed (n=1), and early-onset group B streptococcus sepsis secondary to maternal colonization (n=1). There were no neonatal deaths. Ultrasound guidance during Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is an original and novel approach. We describe the use of intrapartum ultrasound in assessing fetal head station and position and also to simultaneously and objectively monitor performance of rotational forceps delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound enhances operator confidence and, possibly, patient safety. It is a valuable adjunct to obstetrical training and can improve learning efficiency. Real-time ultrasound guidance of fetal head rotation to occiput anterior position with Kielland's forceps may also protect the perineum and reduce anal sphincter injury. This novel approach can lead to a renaissance in the safe use of Kielland's forceps.

Duration of first vaginal birth following cesarean: Is stage of labor at previous cesarean a factor?

ObjectiveParturients in second delivery undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) are divided to those who had their cesarean delivery (CD) while in labor as opposed to those who had an elective CD. We aimed to study if the stage of labor that was present during the primary CD is associated with the duration of subsequent spontaneous VBAC. MethodsA retrospective study (2006–2014). Multiparas in second delivery with a history of a CD (P2-VBAC) were sub-grouped based on stage of labor at which the CD was performed in the first delivery; elective, latent, first or second stage of labor, Duration of labor was compared between P2-VBAC (as one group and further as the sub-groups) to primiparas (P1), multiparas in second (P2) and third (P3) vaginal delivery (VD). A Cox regression analysis was performed including maternal age, preterm-delivery, regional anesthesia, oxytocin augmentation, birthweight and neonatal gender. ResultsA total of 58,028 parturients were included in the study. Mean duration of labor was significantly longer in parturients with a first VD (P1 and P2-VBAC) compared to repeat VD (P2 and P3), 6.0 versus 2.5 h, respectively, (P < 0.001). Analyzing duration of labor by the sub-groups of P2-VBAC revealed that spontaneous VD following a second-stage CD was associated with shorter duration of labor when compared with spontaneous VD following elective, latent and active first stage CD 4.2 versus 6.3, 7.0, 6.9 h respectively, p<0.001. ConclusionSecond stage CD shortens duration of the following VBAC compared to those who underwent cesarean in earlier stages of labor.

Cephalic Elevation Device for Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery

A cephalic elevation device is an inflatable device that elevates the fetal head. We sought to evaluate whether such a device reduces time to delivery after hysterotomy and lowers morbidity in cesarean deliveries during the second stage of labor. We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial among nulliparous, term women aged 18-50 years with vertex singleton pregnancies. Women were eligible if they were to undergo cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor. All participating women had the cephalic elevation device inserted by the delivering provider and were randomly allocated to inflation or noninflation of the device. Inflation was performed in a blinded fashion. The primary outcome was time from hysterotomy to delivery. A sample size of 30 per group (N=60 participants) was planned to detect a 50% decrease in time to delivery after hysterotomy with cephalic elevation device inflation. From January 2018 through July 2019, 60 women who underwent cesarean delivery in the second stage were randomized. Analysis was by intention to treat. Women in the inflation group were older (33 vs 30.5 years), but the groups were otherwise similar. In both groups, most women had a low-transverse hysterotomy (93%). The median time from hysterotomy to delivery was significantly shorter in the inflation group (31 vs 54 seconds; P<.01). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes. Use of the cephalic elevation device during second-stage cesarean delivery led to a 23-second reduction time from hysterotomy to delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03342508. The cephalic elevation devices used in this study were donated by Safe Obstetrics Systems.

914: Second stage of labor: Maternal and perinatal outcomes of cesarean versus attempted operative vaginal delivery

Among women who reach the second stage of labor and require operative delivery, little data exists on the maternal and perinatal outcomes based on attempted operative vaginal delivery (OVD) vs cesarean delivery (CD) without attempted OVD. The objective of this study was to compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes among these two groups. This is a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective study for women enrolled in the Cesarean Registry. We compared the maternal and perinatal outcomes based on whether OVD was attempted or CD was performed without attempt. This study includes singleton, at > 37 weeks, pregnancies that were eligible for OVD (10cm dilated and +2 station). Exclusion criteria included those who underwent CD in second stage with primary indication of non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing and those with anomalous fetuses. Primary outcome was composite maternal morbidity and secondary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity. A multivariable Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the association between attempt of OVD and outcomes, while adjusting for potential confounding factors that were different between groups at a p value of < 0.1 in univariate analysis. A total of 1,432 women met the inclusion criteria: 1,025 (71%) had an attempted OVD and 407 underwent CD without attempt (39%). Women who attempted OVD were more likely to have composite maternal morbidity (aRR 2.93, 95% CI 1.92-4.49), mostly from third and fourth degree perineal lacerations (Table 1). There was no significant difference in rates of composite neonatal morbidity between groups; however, neonatal birth injury was significantly more frequent in the group who had an attempted OVD (aRR 4.79, 95% CI 1.85-12.42)(Table 2). In women reaching the second stage, CD without attempt was associated with lower maternal morbidity and less neonatal birth injury. Given that OVD training is declining in residency programs, these data may have clinical implications regarding counseling of patients eligible for OVD.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Looking back: sectio in mortua and the role of the midwife

Operative vaginal delivery and, in particular, rotational forceps delivery require extensive training, specific skills, and dexterity. Performed correctly, it can reduce the need for difficult late second-stage cesarean delivery and its associated complications. When rotation to occiput anterior position is achieved, pelvic trauma and anal sphincter injury commonly associated with direct delivery from occiput posterior positions may be avoided.We report the original and novel use of real-time intrapartum ultrasound simultaneously during Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery to monitor correct execution and increase maternal safety.This is a prospective observational study performed at the Charité University Hospital in Berlin between 2013 and 2018. Simultaneous, real-time, intrapartum suprapubic ultrasound during Kielland’s rotational forceps deliveries were performed in a series of laboring women with normal fetuses and arrest of labor in the late second stage and with a fetal head malposition, requiring operative vaginal delivery. In addition to vaginal palpation for head station, rotation, and asynclitism, intrapartum ultrasound was also used to objectively determine head station, head direction, and midline angle. The operator was not blinded to the ultrasound findings.The delivering obstetrician examined the woman and performed the delivery. An assistant, trained in intrapartum ultrasound, placed a curved-array transducer transversely in the midline just above the pubic bone to display the forceps blades being applied and the rotation of the fetal head in occiput anterior position.In all 32 laboring women included in the study, the blades were applied correctly and the fetal heads successfully rotated to an occiput anterior position with direct ultrasound confirmation, and vaginal delivery was achieved. There were no cases of difficult application, repeat application, slippage of the blades, or rotation of the fetal head in the wrong direction. Maternal outcomes showed no vaginal tears, cervical tears, or postpartum hemorrhage >500 mL. There was 1 case of third-degree perineal tear (3a). Neonatal outcomes included mild hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), small cephalohematoma conservatively managed (n=1), and early-onset group B streptococcus sepsis secondary to maternal colonization (n=1). There were no neonatal deaths.Ultrasound guidance during Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery is an original and novel approach. We describe the use of intrapartum ultrasound in assessing fetal head station and position and also to simultaneously and objectively monitor performance of rotational forceps delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound enhances operator confidence and, possibly, patient safety. It is a valuable adjunct to obstetrical training and can improve learning efficiency. Real-time ultrasound guidance of fetal head rotation to occiput anterior position with Kielland’s forceps may also protect the perineum and reduce anal sphincter injury. This novel approach can lead to a renaissance in the safe use of Kielland’s forceps.

A cross-sectional study exploring the incidence of and indications for second-stage cesarean delivery over three decades.

To observe the incidence of, indications for, and complications associated with second-stage cesarean delivery in 10-year intervals over 30years. The present analysis of prospectively collected data compared cesarean deliveries during 1976, 1986, 1996, and 2006 at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, UK (n=3222). Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal details were reviewed. The proportion of deliveries by cesarean in the second stage of labor increased from 0.5% (22/4464) in 1976 to 2.1% (124/5998) in 2006 (P<0.001). The proportion of cesarean deliveries during the second stage because of failed instrumental delivery also increased over the study period from 59.1% (13/22) in 1976 to 71.0% (88/124) in 2006. Compared with cesareans at other stages, uterine trauma (P<0.001), blood loss greater than 1000mL (P=0.002), and blood transfusion (P=0.001) were more frequent in second-stage cesarean delivery. Neonates delivered by second-stage cesarean had lower Apgar scores (P<0.001 for 1-min and 5-min scores) and cord arterial pH values (P<0.001) than did those delivered by cesarean earlier in labor. A trend towards an increase in neonatal trauma with second-stage cesarean compared with cesarean delivery before labor or during the first stage did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of deliveries by cesarean in the second stage of labor increased; these deliveries were associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity, but were not influenced by the indication for cesarean.

Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth

Cesarean delivery is being increasingly used by obstetricians for indicated deliveries in the second stage of labor. Unplanned extension of the uterine incision involving the cervix often occurs with these surgeries. Therefore, we hypothesized that cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor may increase the rate of subsequent spontaneous premature birth. We sought to determine if cesarean delivery in the late first stage of labor or in the second stage of labor increases the risk of a subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of matched first and second births from a large Canadian perinatal database. The primary outcomes were spontaneous premature birth <37 and <32 weeks of gestation in the second birth. The exposure was stage of labor and cervical dilation at the time of the first cesarean delivery. The protocol and analysis plan was registered prior to obtaining data at Open Science Foundation. In total, 189,021 paired first and second births were identified. The risk of spontaneous preterm delivery <37 and <32 weeks of gestation in the second birth was increased when the first birth was by cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor (relative risk, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-1.73 and relative risk, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.68, respectively). The risk of perinatal death in the second birth, excluding congenital anomalies, was also correspondingly increased (relative risk, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.96). Cesarean delivery in second stage of labor was associated with a 2-fold increase in the risk of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks of gestation in a subsequent birth. This information may inform management of operative delivery in the second stage.

Attempted and Successful Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery by Prepregnancy Body Mass Index.

To examine rates of attempted and successful vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,084 women with singleton gestations needing operative delivery assistance and vacuum-eligible (fully dilated, +2 station or greater, 34 weeks of gestation or greater) using 2006-2014 inpatient records. Prepregnancy BMI was categorized as underweight (less than 18.5), normal weight (18.5 to less than 25), overweight (25 to less than 30), or obese (30 or greater). Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of attempted and successful vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery by prepregnancy BMI adjusted for age, race, marital status, parity, diabetes, labor induction-augmentation, episiotomy, gestational age, and neonatal birth weight. Thirty-nine percent of women requiring delivery assistance and eligible for a vacuum were overweight or obese, 79% had vacuum attempts, and 95.3% of attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries were successful. Compared with women who were normal weight prepregnancy (82.8%), women who were overweight or obese were less likely to have vacuum attempted (75.8%, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96 and 71.2%, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.74, respectively). Among women with attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, successful delivery did not differ by prepregnancy BMI (92.6%, OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.21-1.37 for underweight; 94.5%, OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.57-2.00 for overweight; 96.3%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.51-2.33 for obese compared with 95.6% among normal-weight women). Among women in need of operative delivery assistance, prepregnancy obesity was associated with lower likelihood of attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery but, if attempted, success rates were similar to rates among normal-weight women. With significant morbidity of second-stage cesarean delivery in obese women, research should examine whether vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery may be appropriate for additional obese patients.

Randomized controlled trial of elevation of the fetal head with a fetal pillow during cesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation.

To evaluate whether use of the Fetal Pillow (Safe Obstetric Systems, Shenfield, UK) affects maternal and fetal morbidity in cesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at two teaching hospitals in West Bengal, India, between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Women undergoing cesarean delivery at full dilatation were enrolled and randomly assigned with computer-generated random numbers (block size 10) to undergo delivery with or without the Fetal Pillow. Group assignment was not masked. The primary outcome was the incidence of major uterine wound extensions (grade 2-3). Overall, 120 women were assigned to each group. Major uterine wound extensions occurred in 6 (5.0%) women in the Fetal Pillow group and 39 (32.5%) in the control group (relative risk 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.48). Use of the Fetal Pillow in second-stage cesarean delivery significantly reduces the risk of a major extension of the uterine incision. CTRI registration number: CTRI/2015/03/005651.

Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth?

The effect of a cesarean delivery in different stages of labor on spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in a subsequent pregnancy has not been studied extensively. The objective of the study was to evaluate the risk of subsequent sPTB after a first-stage or second-stage cesarean delivery compared with a vaginal delivery. This was a planned secondary analysis of a large retrospective cohort study of women with 2 consecutive deliveries from 2005-2010. Women with a previous sPTB were excluded. First-stage (<10 cm) and second-stage (≥10 cm) cesarean deliveries were compared with vaginal deliveries. Data were obtained through chart abstraction. The primary outcome was sPTB (<37 wk) in a subsequent pregnancy. Categoric variables were compared with the use of χ(2) analyses, and logistic regression was used to calculate odds and control for confounders. Eight hundred eighty-seven women were included (721 vaginal deliveries; 129 first-stage and 37 second-stage cesarean deliveries). The sPTB rate varied between groups (7.8%, 2.3%, and 13.5%, respectively; P = .03). When compared with women with a vaginal delivery, women with a first-stage cesarean delivery had a decreased risk of sPTB, which remained after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.99; P = .049). There was a nonsignificant increase in odds of sPTB after a second-stage cesarean delivery compared with a vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-7.43; P = .13). Women with a second-stage cesarean delivery had a 6-fold higher odds of sPTB compared with women with a first-stage cesarean delivery, which remained after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-30.8; P = .04). Women with a full-term second-stage cesarean delivery have a significantly higher than expected rate of subsequent sPTB (13.5%) compared with both the overall national sPTB rate (7-8%) and to a first-stage cesarean delivery (2.3%). As the cesarean delivery rate continues to rise, this potential impact on pregnancy outcomes cannot be ignored.

A Simple Device Prevents Hysterotomy Extensions during Cesarean Delivery for Failed Second Stage of Labor

Background/ Aims: During arrest of descent, maternal tissues conform to the fetal head, resulting in a suction-cup like effect during cesarean delivery. We hypothesize that breaking this suction might ease delivery. A novel device was designed for this purpose and tested in this series of 23 patients. Methods: University-based retrospective cohort feasibility study. Term pregnant women with second-stage labor arrest (n = 23) provided written consent for use of the experimental device, inserted vaginally prior to cesarean delivery. Delivering obstetricians rated device effectiveness. Following case collection, the presence of hysterotomy extensions in study patients was retrospectively compared with controls (n = 49) from the same study period. Results: On a 7-point Likert scale, consultant obstetricians rated overall device effectiveness as 6.0, and resident obstetricians rated it 6.3, consistent with a moderate improvement in ease of delivery. The device performed optimally at mid-pelvic stations (0 to +1), with no hysterotomy extensions (n = 0/17), which was significantly better than controls (n = 14/41, 34%, p < 0.01). Conclusion: A simple device prevented hysterotomy extension during second-stage cesarean delivery at 0 and +1 station. Obstetricians perceived that the device afforded a moderate improvement in delivery compared with previous deliveries in which the device was not used.