Second-line Systemic Therapy Research Articles

Real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab-tremelimumab as second-line systemic therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma are known. We explored ICI rechallenges with direct switching from 1 ICI regimen to another. This retrospective study included 16 patients who received atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and durvalumab-tremelimumab (Dur+Tre) as the first-line and second-line combination therapy, respectively, at Hiroshima University Hospital. The radiological response and adverse event were evaluated in all patients. Of the 16 patients, 12 were male, and the median age at Atezo+Bev induction was 71 years. The reasons for medication changes were disease progression in 11 patients and adverse events in 5 patients. With Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre initiation, the Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer stage (A/B/C) progressed in 9/6/3 and 3/4/9 patients and the Child-Pugh classification (A/B/C) progressed in 12/4/0 and 9/6/3 patients, respectively. The disease control rate and overall response rate of Atezo+Bev were 87.5% and 58.3%, respectively, and of Dur+Tre were 62.5% and 0%, respectively. The most common immune-related adverse event in both the Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre groups was colitis; 3 of the 5 patients with colitis on Atezo+Bev treatment had colitis with Dur+Tre, and 2 had exacerbations. Regarding liver function, ALBI score significantly decreased during Atezo+Bev, but not Dur+Tre, treatment. In patients with colitis following Atezo+Bev, subsequent Dur+Tre treatment may induce colitis recurrence or exacerbation. For immune-related adverse events other than colitis, Dur+Tre could provide relatively safe disease control while maintaining liver function.

8 Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: 8-year follow-up with analyses in favorable risk patients from the phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial

Abstract Background First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has provided substantial long-term survival benefits over sunitinib (SUN) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214. With a median follow-up of 8 years, the longest follow-up to date for any phase 3 trial of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in patients with aRCC, we report survival, response per independent radiology review committee (IRRC), and safety in all randomized patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population) and in patients with International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable risk. Methods Patients with clear cell aRCC were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W×4 doses, followed by NIVO (3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W); or SUN 50 mg once daily for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off. Key study endpoints included overall survival (OS), IRRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate/poor-risk (primary), ITT (secondary), and favorable-risk (exploratory) patients. Cancer-specific survival was evaluated in ITT patients by censoring all causes of death other than RCC. Post hoc exploratory analyses in patients with favorable risk were performed. Results With 8 years (99.1 months) median follow-up, OS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN remained superior in ITT patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; Table). The HR for PFS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 0.88. ORR was higher with NIVO+IPI versus SUN (Table), with more complete responses (12% vs 3%) and a longer median duration of response (DOR) in the combination arm versus SUN. In patients with favorable risk, OS benefits were similar between arms (HR, 0.82; Table). The HR for PFS favored SUN (HR, 1.76). ORR was lower with NIVO+IPI versus SUN, yet more patients achieved complete responses (13% vs 6%, respectively) and median DOR was longer with NIVO+IPI. Median cancer-specific survival (95% CI) in ITT patients was 73.7 (62.8-91.2) months with NIVO+IPI versus 45.1 (37.8-53.3) months with SUN (HR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.82). In exploratory post hoc analyses of patients with favorable risk, 75/125 (60.0%) patients in the NIVO+IPI arm and 85/124 (68.5%) patients in the SUN arm died over 8 years of follow-up. Of these patients, 31 in the NIVO+IPI arm and 27 in the SUN arm died within 3 years of randomization; the primary reason for death was disease in either arm (71.0% and 85.2%, respectively). Furthermore, among 27 patients in the NIVO+IPI arm with favorable risk who died after disease progression within 3 years, 12 patients did not receive second-line systemic therapy. Beyond 3 years, only 2 of 43 patients who died after disease progression did not receive subsequent systemic therapy. Among all treated patients, incidence of any-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events remained largely unchanged. No new drug-related deaths occurred in either arm since the previous database lock. Table Conclusions With a median follow-up up of 8 years, NIVO+IPI continues to demonstrate sustained survival and more durable response benefits versus SUN in the ITT population, including a further reduction in the risk of death with NIVO+IPI as measured by cancer-specific survival. Long-term exploratory data in patients with favorable risk have shown a steady improvement in the HR for OS, and a marked improvement in median DOR and complete response rates with NIVO+IPI versus SUN, thus contributing to the survival and response benefits reported in the ITT population. Furthermore, the disproportionate number of patients with favorable risk who died within 3 years of randomization after documented progression without receiving subsequent therapy may have affected the HR for OS in this patient population early on. NIVO+IPI offers the potential for positive long-term outcomes, regardless of IMDC risk, and with no emergence of new safety signals.

Geriatric assessment and management with question prompt list using a web-based application for elderly patients with cancer to communicate aging-related concerns: A randomized clinical trial (J-SUPPORT 2101 study).

1511 Background: Older adults with cancer have aging-related physical and psychosocial problems that should be fully shared with their oncologists. Geriatric assessment (GA) can assess these aging-related problems and guide management. Communication support might also facilitate implementation of GA-guided management (GAM). We conducted this single-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a program providing GAM recommendation and communication support between older Japanese patients with cancer and their oncologists. Methods: Eligibility criteria were age≥70 years, advanced or recurrent cancers of gastrointestinal origin, referral to one of the two institutions for first- or second-line systemic therapy, and impairment in at least one GA domain as assessed using a web-based application at baseline. In the intervention group, GAM recommendations and question prompt list (QPL) were provided to patients by trained intervention providers to be shared with their oncologists at the first outpatient visit after randomization. Over 5 months after the initial intervention, implementation of GAM recommendations was reviewed monthly by the intervention providers with the patients and their oncologists. Patients in the control group received usual care. The primary endpoint was the number of conversations about aging-related concerns at the first visit. The quality of conversations was assessed in terms of the number of conversations in which stated concerns were acknowledged and considered further by the oncologist and the number of conversations in which acknowledged concerns motivated implementation of GAM recommendations. Results: A total of 215 patients (99 women, 116 men; median age 75 [range 70-88] years) were randomized (n=108/107 in the intervention/control group) between September 2021 and September 2023. There were no differences between two groups in patient background characteristics including the prevalence of GA impairments. The number of conversations about aging-related concerns was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (mean [SD] 2.95 [1.53] vs. 1.90 [1.49], p<0.0001). The number of high-quality conversations and number of conversations about GAM recommendations were also significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (1.73 [1.40] vs. 1.12 [1.16], p=0.001; 0.57 [0.74] vs. 0.28 [0.47], p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Our program providing GAM recommendations and communication support successfully facilitated aging-related communications between patients and their oncologists. We will further examine whether facilitated communication leads to actual implementation of GAM and improved patient health outcomes in a follow-up study. Clinical trial information: UMIN000045428 .

An open-label, multicenter study investigating RP2 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with second-line systemic atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.

TPS4191 Background: Despite advances in treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), long-term survival rates remain poor. The combination of atezolizumab (Atezo) plus bevacizumab (Bev) is approved as frontline therapy for advanced HCC, but only a minority of patients (pts) respond and secondary resistance usually occurs within months. HCC has an immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment (TME), mediated by activated immune checkpoint signaling and angiogenesis pathways, which may contribute to therapeutic resistance. RP2 is an enhanced potency oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) that expresses the fusogenic gibbon ape leukemia virus glycoprotein with the R sequence deleted (GALV-GP-R–), GM-CSF, and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule. The direct oncolytic effect coupled with immune stimulation by RP2 in the TME is intended to provide systemic antitumor activity and synergize with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents, such as Atezo. Preclinical data have demonstrated improved distribution of oncolytic HSV within tumors in combination with Bev, supporting the clinical combination of RP2 with Bev. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP2 combined with Atezo plus Bev as second-line systemic therapy for unresectable and advanced HCC (NCT05733598). Methods: This is an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial. Up to 30 pts will be enrolled and receive RP2 in combination with Atezo plus Bev. Key inclusion criteria include advanced unresectable HCC with ≥1 measurable tumor of ≥1 cm in longest diameter, Child-Pugh class A, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and progression on 1 prior systemic treatment, which must have included a PD-1/PD-L1–directed agent. Key exclusion criteria include untreated/incompletely treated esophageal and/or gastric varices with bleeding or at high risk for bleeding and macroscopic invasion of the tumor into any major blood vessel(s) and/or main bile ducts. Pts will receive intratumoral RP2 Q2W for 4 doses, then Q3W for up to 4 doses. Bev will be given at 10 mg/kg Q2W starting with the first dose of RP2 then at 15 mg/kg Q3W starting with cycle 4; Atezo will be given at 840 mg Q2W for cycles 2 and 3, then at 1200 mg Q3W starting with cycle 4. Pts will receive treatment until confirmed progressive disease, loss of clinical benefit, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of pts achieving a best overall response of complete response or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 as modified for this study. Secondary endpoints are safety, ORR using HCC-modified RECIST, duration of response, complete response rate, and progression-free survival. Clinical trial information: NCT05733598 .

Real-World Analysis of Post-Progression Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients Treated with First-Line Osimertinib.

Introduction: The use of osimertinib in the first-line (1L) setting is an effective treatment option for sensitizing EGFR-mutations (EGFRm+) and has significantly altered the standard of care practice for EGFRm+ disease in Canada. Unfortunately, acquired resistance to osimertinib is almost universal, and outcomes are disparate. Post-progression treatment patterns and the outcome of real-world Canadian EGFRm+ patients receiving 1L osimertinib were the focus of this retrospective review. Methods: The Glans-Look Lung Cancer Research database was used to identify and collect demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome data on EGFRm+ patients who received 1L osimertinib in the Canadian province of Alberta between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 150 patients receiving 1L osimertinib were identified. In total, 86 developed progressive disease, with 56 (65%) continuing systemic therapy, 73% continuing osimertinib, and 27% switching to second-line (2L) systemic therapy. Patients were similar both in clinical characteristics at 1L osimertinib initiation and patterns of treatment failure at progression; those continuing 1L osimertinib post-progression had a longer time to progression (13.5 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.05) and subsequent post-osimertinib initiation survival (34.7 vs. 22.8 months, p = 0.11). Conclusions: The continuation of osimertinib post-progression is an effective disease management strategy for select real-world EGFRm+ patients, providing continued clinical benefit, potentially due to different underlying disease pathogenesis.

The Role of Anti-PD 1 (Programmed Cell Death-1) (Pembrolizumab) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Literature Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor originating from liver cells, HCC occurs in around 85% of patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. Treatment options for HCC consider liver function, extrahepatic spread, invasiveness, and the number and size of nodules. HCC therapy options include surgical resection, liver transplantation, tumor ablation, transarterial therapy and systemic chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab is a second-line systemic therapy option for the treatment of HCC after sorafenib therapy. Pembrolizumab is a class of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and more specifically works as a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor.

Prognostic value of the Scottish Inflammatory prognostic Score in patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 ≥ 50 % progressing on first-line pembrolizumab

BackgroundMost patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy will experience progressive disease (PD). Only a minority will go on to receive subsequent systemic anticancer therapy for which outcomes are guarded. We investigated the prognostic significance of biomarkers of systemic inflammation following failure of first-line pembrolizumab for NSCLC to aid subsequent management decisions. MethodsPatients with radiological and/or clinical evidence of PD on first-line pembrolizumab for advanced NSCLC at a regional Scottish cancer centre were identified. Inflammatory biomarkers at the time of PD, including serum albumin, neutrophil count and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS; combing albumin and neutrophils), and clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, histology, PDL1 expression and time to PD were recorded. The relationship between these and post-progression overall survival (ppOS) were examined. ResultsData were available for 211 patients. Median ppOS was 2.1 months. Only SIPS was predictive of ppOS on multivariate analysis (HR2.54 (95 %CI 1.81–3.56) (<0.001)), stratifying ppOS from 0.8 months (SIPS2), to 1.8 months (SIPS1), to 8.1 months (SIPS0) (p < 0.001). Thirty (14 %) patients received second-line systemic anticancer therapy with median ppOS 8.7 months. These patients had lower levels of systemic inflammation, as defined by albumin (p < 0.001), neutrophil count (p = 0.002), and SIPS (p = 0.004)), than all other patients. ConclusionsSIPS, a simple biomarker of systemic inflammation, predicts ppOS after first-line pembrolizumab and may be useful alongside routine assessments of patient fitness to inform individualised discussions about subsequent treatment. We highlight poor outcomes in this patient group and a role for SIPS in signposting transition to best supportive care and early referral to palliative care. It may also help identify a small group of patients most likely to benefit from further lines of therapy.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma - an overview of current systemic therapy

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the more common tumor diseases in older adults. The only curative treatment method is surgical resection in the localized stage. Based on current study data, drug (combination) therapy in the metastatic stage is the most effective treatment option for non-resectable/metastatic RCC (mRCC). Immuno-oncological combinations of 2 Checkpoint-Inhibitors (CPI) or CPIs and Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are now standard in the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Since the results of foundational combination therapy studies are not fully comparable due to different study design and patient populations, additional clinical and patient-related criteria are required when making individual treatment decisions. The systemic therapy of advanced RCC is therefore based on tumor extent, treatment pressure, concomitant diseases, and personal circumstances. A decision on first-line therapy should be made individually as part of a "shared decision" with the patient. The selection of a second-line systemic therapy is based on individual criteria; the data available for a well-founded classification of a possible therapy sequence after progression to first-line therapy is sparse. Further investigations to optimize systemic therapy (expansion of combination therapy to triple combination of CPI+CPI+TKI) or evaluation of therapy in other histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma are the subject of ongoing clinical studies.

Second-line tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis from RATIONALE-302.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a poor prognosis, with limited second-line systemic therapy options, and represents an increasing disease burden in Japan. In the phase 3 RATIONALE-302 study, the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, tislelizumab, significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced/metastatic ESCC. Here, we report the Japanese patient subgroup results. Patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with disease progression during/after first-line systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 to open-label tislelizumab 200mg every 3weeks or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel/docetaxel). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomized Japanese patients. The Japanese subgroup comprised 50 patients (n = 25 per arm). Tislelizumab improved OS versus chemotherapy (median: 9.8 vs. 7.6months; HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.31, 1.12). Among patients with programmed death-ligand 1 score ≥ 10%, median OS was 12.5months with tislelizumab (n = 10) versus 2.9months with chemotherapy (n = 6) (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.09, 1.03). Tislelizumab improved progression-free survival versus chemotherapy (median: 3.6 vs. 1.7months, respectively; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27, 0.95). Objective response rate was greater with tislelizumab (32.0%) versus chemotherapy (20.0%), and responses were more durable (median duration of response: 8.8 vs. 2.6months, respectively). Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events with tislelizumab (24.0%) versus chemotherapy (47.8%). Tislelizumab demonstrated an improvement in health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy. As second-line therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS versus chemotherapy, with a favorable safety profile, in the Japanese patient subgroup, consistent with the overall population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03430843.

Prevalence and prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic role of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in patients with non-immunotherapy-treated advanced cervical cancer. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016, at Asan Medical Center (Korea); archived tumor samples were assessed for PD-L1 expression (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) and TMB (≥175 mutations/exome). Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from advanced diagnosis or initiation of first-line or second-line systemic therapy until death/last follow-up. The association of OS with PD-L1 expression and TMB were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for covariates. Of 267 patients, 76.0% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 24.0% had adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), 64.4% had PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and 32.6% had TMB ≥175 mutations/exome. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and TMB ≥175 mutations/exome were more prevalent in SCC than in AC/ASC (73.9% and 37.2% vs. 34.4% and 17.7%). There was no association between OS and PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥1 vs. <1: adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.84-1.53 from advanced diagnosis); OS trended shorter for the subgroup with TMB ≥175 versus <175 mutations/exome (adjusted HR=1.29; 95% CI=0.95-1.75). Retrospective analysis of non-immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced cervical cancer demonstrated a higher prevalence of PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and TMB ≥175 mutations/exome in SCC versus AC/ASC. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was not associated with OS; TMB ≥175 mutations/exome showed a trend toward shorter OS. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin condition. One of the most common skin disorders in children, atopic dermatitis typically manifests before the age of 5 years, but it can develop at any age. Atopic dermatitis is characterised by dry, inflamed skin accompanied by intense itchiness (pruritus). To appraise the clinical and cost effectiveness of abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib within their marketing authorisations as alternative therapies for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis compared to systemic immunosuppressants (first-line ciclosporin A or second-line dupilumab and baricitinib). Studies were identified from an existing systematic review (search date 2019) and update searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) to November 2021, from bibliographies of retrieved studies, clinical trial registers and evidence provided by the sponsoring companies of the treatments under review. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness literature was carried out and a network meta-analysis undertaken for adults and adolescents at different steps of the treatment pathway. The primary outcome of interest was a combined response of Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 + Dermatology Life Quality Index ≥ 4; where this was consistently unavailable for a step in the pathway, an analysis of Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 was conducted. A de novo economic model was developed to assess cost effectiveness from the perspective of the National Health Service in England. The model structure was informed through systematic review of the economic literature and by consulting clinical experts. Effectiveness data were obtained from the network meta-analysis. Costs and utilities were obtained from the evidence provided by sponsoring companies and standard UK sources. Network meta-analyses indicate that abrocitinib 200 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg may be more effective, and tralokinumab may be less effective than dupilumab and baricitinib as second-line systemic therapies. Abrocitinib 100 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg have a more similar effectiveness to dupilumab. Upadacitinib 30 and 15 mg are likely to be more effective than ciclosporin A as a first-line therapy. Upadacitinib 15 mg, abrocitinib 200 and 100 mg may be more effective than dupilumab in adolescents. The cost effectiveness of abrocitinib and upadacitinib for both doses is dependent on the subgroup of interest. Tralokinumab can be considered cost-effective as a second-line systemic therapy owing to greater cost savings per quality-adjusted life-year lost. The primary strength of the analysis of the three new drugs compared with current practice for each of the subpopulations is the consistent approach to the assessment of clinical and cost effectiveness. However, the conclusions are limited by the high uncertainty around the clinical effectiveness and lack of data for the primary outcome for comparisons with baricitinib and for the adolescent and adult first-line populations. The most significant limitation that Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 + Dermatology Life Quality Index ≥ 4 could not be obtained for the adolescent and adult first-line systemic treatment populations is due to a paucity of data for dupilumab and ciclosporin A. A comparison of the new drugs against one another in addition to current practice would be beneficial to provide a robust view on which treatments are the most cost-effective. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021266219. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: 135138) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 4. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

PCR76 Generating Health-State Utility Values in Patients Treated with Second-Line Systemic Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

PCR76 Generating Health-State Utility Values in Patients Treated with Second-Line Systemic Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Reirradiation with radiosurgery or stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy in association with regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma.

No standard treatment has yet been established for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). In this context, the aim of the current study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of reirradiation (re-RT) by radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/FSRT) in association with regorafenib. Patients with ahistological or radiological diagnosis of recurrent GBM who received re-RT by SRS/FSRT and regorafenib as second-line systemic therapy were included in the analysis. From January 2020 to December2022, 21patients were evaluated. The median time between primary/adjuvant RT and disease recurrence was 8months (range 5-20). Median re-RT dose was 24 Gy (range 18-36 Gy) for amedian number of 5fractions (range 1-6). Median regorafenib treatment duration was 12weeks (range 3-26). Re-RT was administered before starting regorafenib or in the week off regorafenib during the course of chemotherapy. The median and the 6‑month overall survival (OS) from recurrence were 8.4months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-12.7 months) and 75% (95% CI 50.9-89.1%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from recurrence was 6months (95% CI 3.7-8.5months). The most frequent side effects were asthenia that occurred in 10patients (8cases of grade2 and 2cases of grade3), and hand-foot skin reaction (2patients grade3, 3patients grade2). Adverse events led to permanent regorafenib discontinuation in 2cases, while in 5/21cases (23.8%), adose reduction was administered. One patient experienced dehiscence of the surgical wound after reintervention and during regorafenib treatment, while another patient reported intestinal perforation that required hospitalization. For recurrent GBM, re-RT with SRT/FSRT plus regorafenib is asafe treatment. Prospective trials are necessary.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes With Brentuximab Vedotin or Other Standard Therapies in Patients With Previously Treated Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the United States

Introduction/BackgroundPrimary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (pcALCLs) are a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in which CD30 is uniformly expressed. In mycosis fungoides (MF), another CTCL, CD30 is heterogeneously expressed. In ALCANZA, patients with pcALCLs or CD30-positive MF randomized to brentuximab vedotin (BV) vs. physician's choice of methotrexate or bexarotene had significantly improved outcomes, including higher objective response rates (ORR) lasting ≥4 months (ORR4), as well as longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). In this study, we sought to assess the real-world impact of treatment with BV in second or later lines of therapy for CTCL. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective chart review describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource use (HRU) in patients with pcALCLs or MF previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy and subsequently treated with BV (n = 139) or other standard therapy (OST; n = 164). ResultsMost patients in the BV cohort (96.4%) received BV as second-line (2L) systemic therapy. The most common OSTs were methotrexate (11.6%), mogamulizumab (9.1%), and bendamustine (9.1%) monotherapies. For 2L BV and OST, median duration of therapy was 8.4 and 5.2 months, real-world ORR was 82.1% and 66.5%, and real-world ORR4 was 42.5% and 25.0%. Real-world 1- and 2-year PFS, TTNT, and OS were significantly longer (all P < .01) and HRU was lower for BV vs. OST. ConclusionThese real-world outcomes are consistent with ALCANZA results, demonstrating favorable outcomes with BV vs. OST in patients with CTCL previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy.

Treatment impact of newly approved therapeutic agents for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Japan: a single-center retrospective study

Although recent clinical trials of new therapeutic agents for metastatic urothelial carcinoma have shown prolonged overall survival, there are few real-world evidence. To assess the impact of new therapeutic agents, we performed retrospective analysis for consecutive 158 metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients who performed systemic therapy in our institution between May 2008 and August 2023. We defined a period from May 2008 to December 2017, when pembrolizumab was first introduced to the clinical setting in the new therapeutic agents for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Japan, as “pre new drug era” and a period from January 2018 to August 2023 as “post new drug era”. We compared overall survival between pre- and post- new drug era using Kaplan–Meier method with log rank test. Median overall survival of pre- and post- new drug era were 14.5 months (95% confidence intervals: 11.6–16.7) and 23.1 months (95% confidence intervals: 14.5-NA), respectively (p < 0.001). Five-year survival rate of pre- and post- new drug era was 7.0% (95% confidence intervals: 2.3–15.3) and 36.3% (95% confidence intervals: 21.4–51.5), respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of factors associated with overall survival showed that enfortumab vedotin administration, administration of second-line or more systemic therapy, best overall response of SD, PR and CR in first-line systemic therapy, higher serum albumin and lower CRP were factors for overall survival prolongation. Introduction of new therapeutic agents for metastatic urothelial carcinoma contributed to the improvement of overall survival in comparison with the era without these agents.

Second-Line Systemic Therapy for Highly Aggressive Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is generally an aggressive form of prostate cancer that can arise de novo or develop as a castration-resistant mechanism. While first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is effective against NEPC, its limited response duration and subsequent treatments pose significant clinical challenges. Standard second-line treatments have not been established due to the limited data available. The aim of this review was to reveal the current status of second-line therapy for NEPC. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science and a total of 13 articles were included in this review. Prospective and retrospective studies demonstrated that treatment outcome of second-line therapy using platinum with etoposide or docetaxel was unfavorable and progression-free survival was 3 months or shorter. Amrubicin and irinotecan were also frequently used as second-line therapy, however, efficacy of these agents was modest and response duration was less than 6 months. NEPC patients with homologous recombination repair gene alterations may benefit from treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Ongoing clinical studies investigate various agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, molecularly targeted agents, and PARP inhibitors. With the increasing recognition and active biopsy of NEPC lesions, the number of NEPC patients is anticipated to rise. Accumulating more knowledge and experience is crucial in developing novel treatment strategies to combat this disease.

Noninvasive imaging-based machine learning algorithm to identify progressive disease in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving second-line systemic therapy

The aim of this study was to predict tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) plus anti-PD-1 antibodies (TKI-PD-1) efficacy as second-line treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using radiomics analysis. From November 2018 to November 2019, a total of 55 patients were included. Radiomic features were obtained from the CT images before treatment and filtered using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) methods. Subsequently, ten prediction algorithms were developed and validated based on radiomic characteristics. The accuracy of the constructed model was measured through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis; survival analysis was performed via Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Overall, 18 (32.7%) out of 55 patients had progressive disease. Through ICCs and LASSO, ten radiomic features were entered into the algorithm construction and validation. Ten machine learning algorithms showed different accuracies, with the support vector machine (SVM) model having the highest AUC value of 0.933 in the training cohort and 0.792 in the testing cohort. The radiomic features were associated with overall survival. In conclsion, the SVM algorithm is a useful method to predict TKI-PD-1 efficacy in patients with advanced HCC using images taken prior to treatment.

THU-148 - Comparison of clinical outcome between Nivolumab and Regorafenib as second-line systemic therapy after Sorafenib failure in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

THU-148 - Comparison of clinical outcome between Nivolumab and Regorafenib as second-line systemic therapy after Sorafenib failure in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

An open-label, multicenter study investigating RP3 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with first- or second-line systemic atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.

TPS4178 Background: Despite advances in treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), long-term survival rates remain poor. The combination of bevacizumab (Bev) and atezolizumab (Atezo) is the preferred frontline therapy for advanced HCC, but a minority of patients (pts) respond, and secondary resistance usually occurs within months. HCC has an immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment, mediated by activated immune checkpoint signaling and angiogenesis pathways, which may contribute to therapeutic resistance. RP3 is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) that expresses the fusogenic gibbon ape leukemia virus glycoprotein with the R sequence deleted (GALV-GP-R–), an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule, CD40 ligand, and 4-1BB ligand. The direct oncolytic effect coupled with immune stimulation by RP3 in the tumor microenvironment is intended to provide systemic antitumor activity and enhance therapeutic response to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents, such as Atezo. Preclinical data have demonstrated improved distribution of oncolytic HSV within tumors in combination with Bev, supporting the clinical combination of RP3 with Bev. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP3 combined with Atezo and Bev as first- (1L) and second-line (2L) systemic therapies for unresectable and advanced HCC. Methods: The 1L and 2L cohorts will each enroll up to 30 pts. Pts in the 1L cohort may not have received prior systemic treatment; pts in the 2L cohort must have progressed on or following one prior line of systemic therapy, which must have included a PD-1/PD-L1−directed agent. Key inclusion criteria include advanced, unresectable HCC with ≥1 measurable tumor of ≥1 cm in longest diameter, Child-Pugh Class A, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0−1. Key exclusion criteria include untreated esophageal and/or gastric varices with bleeding or at high risk for bleeding and macroscopic invasion of tumor into any major blood vessel(s) and/or main bile ducts. Pts with a history of medically refractory hepatic encephalopathy and/or hepato-renal syndrome are also excluded. Pts in the 1L cohort will receive 1200 mg Atezo and 15 mg/kg Bev every 3 weeks (Q3W) together with RP3 intratumorally Q3W for a total of up to 8 doses. Pts in the 2L cohort will receive RP3 every 2 weeks for 4 doses with Bev Q3W starting on cycle (C) 1 day (D) 1, then RP3 and Bev Q3W for up to 4 more doses with Atezo Q3W being added on C4D1. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Secondary endpoints are safety, ORR using HCC modified RECIST, duration of response, complete response rate, and progression-free survival. Clinical trial information: NCT05733598 .

Analysis on real-world chemotherapy outcomes in patients (pts) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistant advanced EGFR-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States.

e21088 Background: Chemotherapy is the current standard of care for pts with EGFR-mutant NSCLC whose tumor develops EGFR TKI resistance. We are conducting a real-world study to understand resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKI and outcomes with subsequent therapies (targeted and non-targeted). Here we report outcome results for standard of care given after resistance to a first-line (1L) EGFR TKI. Methods: This is a non-interventional descriptive cohort study using electronic medical record data and biomarker data from the United States TEMPUS database, which will continue until end of 2024 with new pts entering the study cohort over time. The study period for this reported analysis on real-world chemotherapy outcomes was any time until June 2022. Drug resistance was defined as disease progression on an EGFR TKI. Pts entering the study cohort were adult, with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC, had received an EGFR TKI either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic therapies, and had disease progression after EGFR TKI initiation. Pts were followed after tumor progression and from the initiation of a chemotherapy regimen, to describe treatment patterns and treatment outcomes (real-world progression-free survival [rw-PFS] and overall survival [OS]). Results: Of 21,425 pts with NSCLC, 1,087 patients were eligible for inclusion into the study cohort, with their stage IIIB–IV NSCLC diagnosis spanning from 1999 to 2021. A total of 588 pts (54.1%) received a 1L EGFR TKI and a subsequent second-line (2L) systemic therapy after disease progression. Of these, 100 pts received 2L chemotherapy regimens (platinum-based chemotherapy, n = 48; taxane monotherapy, n = 12; taxane + other chemotherapy, n = 3; pemetrexed, n = 28; other chemotherapy-only regimens, n = 9). Overall, these chemotherapy-treated pts had a median rw-PFS of 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.3, 5.1), and a median OS of 14.2 months (95% CI: 11.8, 22.2). Conclusions: Here, we show that after disease progression on a 1L EGFR TKI, patients had poor disease outcomes on 2L chemotherapy, indicating an unmet medical need as these pts likely developed EGFR TKI resistance. Treatment adaptation based on identified mechanism of resistance such as MET amplification, may improve outcomes for these patients.