Second-line Paclitaxel Research Articles

Abstract 2425: Pairwise analysis of plasma cell-free DNA before and after paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

Abstract Background: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis has emerged as an appealing alternative to detect somatic mutations. This study compared cfDNA at baseline (baseline-cfDNA) and progressive disease (PD-cfDNA) and tumor tissue DNA (ttDNA) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer who underwent palliative second-line paclitaxel+ramucirumab treatment. Methods: We conducted targeted sequencing of 106 cancer-related genes using germline DNA, baseline-cfDNA, and PD-cfDNA samples. The results were then compared with conventional cancer panel results using ttDNA. Results: Of 76 consecutively enrolled patients who received paclitaxel+ramucirumab treatment, 46 patients (27 males; median age 57.5 [range, 32-73] years) with access to all three samples were analyzed along with their ttDNA data. A total of 138, 145, and 80 mutations were detected in baseline-cfDNA, PD-cfDNA, and ttDNA respectively. Combined analysis of baseline-cfDNA and ttDNA revealed that TP53 (56.5%) was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by CDH1 (26.1%), KRAS (21.7%), and APC (13.5%). For the top four genes, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of baseline-cfDNA compared with ttDNA were 71.8% and 51.9%, respectively. Compared with ttDNA alone, 32 patients (70.0%) benefited from baseline-cfDNA in detecting novel mutations. When combined with baseline-cfDNA and PD-cfDNA, novel mutations were discovered in 34 patients (73.9%). Of note, PD-cfDNA analysis detected 9 novel pathogenic mutations in TP53, APC, PIK3CA, CDH1, RNF43, CTNNB1, and BRCA2 genes in 8 patients (17.4%) after treatment. In baseline-cfDNA, patients with a circulating ttDNA fraction concentration at 110-160 bp of >4.3777 ng/µL had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median 3.5 vs. 5.3 months, P=0.016). In addition, maximal variant allele frequency (VAF) values of >0.1045 (median 3.4 vs. 5.2 months, P=0.022) and the sum of VAF values of >0.2071 (median 3.4 vs. 5.2 months, P=0.028) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. In patients with TP53 mutations, those with TP53 VAF values of >0.1014 significantly had worse PFS (median 4.6 vs. 6.4 months, P=0.022). Conclusions: Although cfDNA could not entirely take over the role of ttDNA, cfDNA analysis identified additional somatic mutations that were otherwise missed by ttDNA alone. Moreover, PD-cfDNA analysis detected novel pathogenic mutations that developed during treatment, implicating the clonal evolution of cancer. In addition, baseline cfDNA predicted PFS of patients receiving paclitaxel+ramucirumab therapy. Citation Format: Ji-Won Kim, Dong Soo Kyung, Won Yeong Ko, Hwang-Phill Kim, Sung-Hyun Hwang, Kui-Jin Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Jeongmin Seo, Minsu Kang, Eun Hee Jung, Koung Jin Suh, Se Hyun Kim, Jin Won Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Keun-Wook Lee. Pairwise analysis of plasma cell-free DNA before and after paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2425.

Real-world outcomes of third-line immune checkpoint inhibitors versus irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a Korean, multicenter study (KCSG ST22-06)

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or irinotecan-based chemotherapy is frequently used after failure of second-line paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy between ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy as third-line treatment in patients with AGC.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with AGC, whose third-line treatment started between July 2019 and June 2021 at 17 institutions in Korea. The ICI group included patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and the irinotecan-based chemotherapy group included patients who received irinotecan or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan).ResultsA total of 363 patients [n = 129 (ICI) and n = 234 (irinotecan-based chemotherapy)] were analyzed. The median progression-free survival was 2.3 and 2.9 months in ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.802). The median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 and 6.0 months in ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.786). For all patients included in this study, multivariable analysis showed that weight loss, peritoneal metastasis, low serum sodium or albumin, and short duration of second-line treatment were associated with inferior OS (p < 0.05). ICI showed significantly longer OS than irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients without peritoneal metastasis. Whereas ICI showed significantly shorter OS in patients without PD-L1 expression than irinotecan-based chemotherapy.ConclusionsNo significant difference in survival outcome was observed between ICI and irinotecan-based chemotherapy as third-line treatment for AGC patients. ICI might be preferred for patients without peritoneal metastasis and irinotecan-based chemotherapy for patients with tumors without PD-L1 expression.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (https://cris.nih.go.kr: KCT 0007732).

Claudin18.2 in Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Globally, the fifth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality is gastric cancer (GC). Recent clinical trials on solid tumors enrolled patients who possess druggable genetic alterations, protein expression, and immune characteristics. In gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, trastuzumab combined with first-line chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients and ramucirumab combined with second-line paclitaxel remarkably prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy alone, according to phase 3 trial results. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy was approved as third- or later-line treatment. Chemotherapy plus ICIs as first-line treatment exhibited improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone in HER2-negative patients according to Checkmate 649 trial results. Conversely, systemic chemotherapy prognosis remains poor. although some patients may achieve durable response to treatment and prolonged survival in advanced GC. Recently, a first-in-class, chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody (zolbetuximab) that targets and binds to claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a new target therapy in GC treatment. Global phase Ⅲ trials revealed that the addition of zolbetuximab to first-line chemotherapy prolonged OS in CLDN18.2-positive and HER2-negative GC patients. This review summarizes recent clinical trials of CLDN18.2-targeted therapy.

1585P The impact of platinum-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) in first-line treatment on PN and efficacy in second-line paclitaxel (PTX)-based chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (AGC): A prospective observational multicenter study - IVY study

1585P The impact of platinum-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) in first-line treatment on PN and efficacy in second-line paclitaxel (PTX)-based chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (AGC): A prospective observational multicenter study - IVY study

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline.

To provide evidence-based recommendations updating the 2020 ASCO and Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) guideline on systemic therapy for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer without driver alterations. ASCO updated recommendations on the basis of an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials from 2018 to 2021. This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Five randomized clinical trials provide the evidence base. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. In addition to 2020 options for patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%), nonsquamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC), and performance status (PS) 0-1, clinicians may offer single-agent atezolizumab. With high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%), non-SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilumumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy. With negative (0%) and low positive PD-L1 expression (TPS 1%-49%), non-SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or nivolumab and ipilimumab plus chemotherapy. With high PD-L1 expression, SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer single-agent atezolizumab. With high PD-L1 expression, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or in combination with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. With negative and low positive PD-L1 expression, SCC, and PS 0-1, clinicians may offer nivolumab and ipilimumab alone or in combination with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. With non-SCC who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy as first-line therapy, clinicians may offer second-line paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. With non-SCC, who received chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, clinicians should offer the options of third-line single-agent pemetrexed, docetaxel, or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Lapatinib and poziotinib overcome ABCB1-mediated paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer.

Conventional frontline treatment for ovarian cancer consists of successive chemotherapy cycles of paclitaxel and platinum. Despite the initial favorable responses for most patients, chemotherapy resistance frequently leads to recurrent or refractory disease. New treatment strategies that circumvent or prevent mechanisms of resistance are needed to improve ovarian cancer therapy. We established in vitro paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cell line and organoid models. Gene expression differences in resistant and sensitive lines were analyzed by RNA sequencing. We manipulated candidate genes associated with paclitaxel resistance using siRNA or small molecule inhibitors, and then screened the cells for paclitaxel sensitivity using cell viability assays. We used the Bliss independence model to evaluate the anti-proliferative synergy for drug combinations. ABCB1 expression was upregulated in paclitaxel-resistant TOV-21G (q < 1x10-300), OVCAR3 (q = 7.4x10-156) and novel ovarian tumor organoid (p = 2.4x10-4) models. Previous reports have shown some tyrosine kinase inhibitors can inhibit ABCB1 function. We tested a panel of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the ability to sensitize resistant ABCB1-overexpressing ovarian cancer cell lines to paclitaxel. We observed synergy when we combined poziotinib or lapatinib with paclitaxel in resistant TOV-21G and OVCAR3 cells. Silencing ABCB1 expression in paclitaxel-resistant TOV-21G and OVCAR3 cells reduced paclitaxel IC50 by 20.7 and 6.2-fold, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrated direct inhibition of paclitaxel-induced ABCB1 transporter activity by both lapatinib and poziotinib. In conclusion, lapatinib and poziotinib combined with paclitaxel synergizes to inhibit the proliferation of ABCB1-overexpressing ovarian cancer cells in vitro. The addition of FDA-approved lapatinib to second-line paclitaxel therapy is a promising strategy for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Identifying prognostic factors associated with overall survival in second-line paclitaxel plus ramucirumab treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced/recurrent gastric cancer.

This study aimed to identify the overall survival prolongation index in patients who received paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second line chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2-negative advanced/ recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). We included 77 patients who underwent second line chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus ramucirumab) for AGC at our institution between January 2015 and September 2020. To determine factors associated with survival, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. In the multivariate analysis, grade ≥1 neutropenia (yes) and the number of anti-cancer drugs used (≥5) were independently and significantly associated with survival. Compared to the patients without grade ≥1 neutropenia, patients with grade ≥1 neutropenia had a survival hazard ratio of 0.455 (95% CI: 0.214-0.966; p = 0.040). The median second line treatment durations in patients with grade ≥1 neutropenia (n = 54) and in those without grade ≥1 neutropenia (n = 23) were 133 days (95% CI, 98-190 days) and 70 days (95% CI, 41-128 days), respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.026). This study demonstrated that AGC patients with initial neutropenia may benefit from paclitaxel plus ramucirumab therapy.

P-246 Taxane cross-resistance: An exploratory analysis of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer

Standard treatment for metastatic gastric cancer (GC) is chemotherapy (CT). Most commonly, first-line chemotherapy is based on a combination of fluoropyrimidines, platinum derivates, and, in case of a HER2 overexpression, trastuzumab. First choice for second-line chemotherapy is paclitaxel associated with ramucirumab. However, there is a dearth of data about the optimal second-line treatment in patients (pts) who progress on first-line treatment including taxanes. For these pts, second-line paclitaxel and ramucirumab could incur in lack of efficacy due to taxanes cross-resistance.

Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel with or without targeted therapy as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.

Backgroud:Paclitaxel (PTX) has become a widely used second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. There exists controversy whether targeted therapy combined with PTX can provide additional benefit over PTX alone. Therefore, a meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two therapy regimes.Methods:We searched systematically for studies from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library published between January 2000 and August 2019. Only randomized controlled trials were eligible. Statistical analysis was performed by meta-analysis. The primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival, objective response rate and adverse events were the secondary end points.Results:A total of 4 randomized controlled trials with 1574 patients (PTX + targeted therapy, n = 786; PTX, n = 788) were included for the final analysis. As compared with PTX monotherapy, PTX + targeted therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.92, P < .001), overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86–0.95, P < .001) and was associated with a better objective response rate (RR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.45–2.24; P < .001). PTX+targeted therapy group significantly increased incidences of grade 3 to 5 neutropenia, fatigue and neuropathy (P < .05). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidences of grade 3 to 5 anemia, decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain between the two treatments (P >.05).Conclusions:Second-line PTX+targeted therapy is a more effective treatment option with tolerable safety profile for advanced gastric cancer as a result of improved survival, though with additional toxicity.

Effect of First-line S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without Ramucirumab Followed by Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab on Advanced Gastric Cancer in East Asia

Ramucirumab, a human IgG 1 antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, has been shown to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the second-line setting. To compare progression-free survival for S-1 and oxaliplatin plus ramucirumab with that for S-1 and oxaliplatin plus placebo in patients with advanced gastric cancer. This phase 2, double-blind randomized clinical trial (RAINSTORM [First-line S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin With or Without Ramucirumab Followed by Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer]) was conducted from October 12, 2015, to April 11, 2018, at 36 sites in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Participants were chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 189) with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Analyses of the full analysis set and safety population were conducted between November 27, 2017, and June 4, 2018. Patients randomized to the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm received S-1, 80 to 120 mg/d twice daily, on days 1 to 14 and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2, on day 1 with ramucirumab, 8 mg/kg, on days 1 and 8 in part A (21-day cycle). Patients randomized to the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm received the same S-1 and oxaliplatin dosage as well as placebo on days 1 and 8 in part A. Eligible patients received second-line paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 and ramucirumab, 8 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 in part B (28-day cycle). The primary end point was progression-free survival, analyzed using the stratified log-rank test; the hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using the stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model. Secondary end points included overall survival and adverse events. In total, 189 patients were randomized and received treatment: 96 to the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm and 93 to the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm. Among the 189 patients, 121 (64.0%) were male, and the median (range) age was 62.0 (26-84) years. Median progression-free survival was not prolonged in the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm compared with the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm (6.34 [80% CI, 5.65-6.93] vs 6.74 [80% CI, 5.75-7.13] months; HR, 1.07; 80% CI, 0.86-1.33; P = .70). Median overall survival was 14.65 (80% CI, 12.39-15.67) months in the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm and 14.26 (80% CI, 13.83-17.31) months in the placebo plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm (HR, 1.11; 80% CI, 0.89-1.40; P = .55). The most commonly reported grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events in the ramucirumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin arm in part A were decreased neutrophil count (14 patients [14.6%]), hypertension (10 patients [10.4%]), and anemia (10 patients [10.4%]). In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of ramucirumab to first-line S-1 and oxaliplatin treatment did not prolong progression-free survival or overall survival compared with S-1 and oxaliplatin alone among East Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer; no new safety signals for ramucirumab were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02539225.

Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Advanced Chemotherapy-Refractory Gastric Cancer

Standard chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer employs first-line fluorinated pyrimidine and a platinum agent, second-line paclitaxel and

Advances in the treatment of gastric cancer.

To review the recent literature regarding treatment of gastric cancer. Addition of postoperative radiation therapy to perioperative chemotherapy offers no survival benefit. Fluoropyrimidines, in particular 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), are the backbone for gastric cancer chemotherapy. S-1, an oral prodrug of 5-FU, has become the mainstay for gastric cancer chemotherapy in Japan. In a Japanese adjuvant chemotherapy trial, addition of docetaxel to standard S-1 chemotherapy improved disease-free survival; this regimen will become their new standard for adjuvant therapy. Microsatellite instability (MSI) high status is emerging as a favorable prognostic marker in resected gastric cancer and may indicate a group of patients who do not gain additional benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. In metastatic gastric cancer, the addition of ramucirumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-targeted antibody, to first-line chemotherapy did not improve survival over chemotherapy alone. Trifluridine/tipiracil treatment in chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer improved survival compared to placebo and will emerge as a late-line therapy option. Phase II and III trials indicate activity for the immune checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab in chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer and have led to US regulatory approval for pembrolizumab in chemotherapy-refractory programmed death ligand 1-positive or MSI-high gastric cancer, and approval in Japan for nivolumab in chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer. However, a phase III trial in advanced gastric cancer failed to show a survival benefit for pembrolizumab over conventional paclitaxel. The poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, added to second-line paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer failed to improve overall survival compared with paclitaxel alone. Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy without radiation therapy remains the standard of care in gastric cancer. Addition of docetaxel to adjuvant S-1 will likely emerge as a new care standard. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab improve survival and now are treatment options in chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer, especially for programmed death ligand 1-positive or MSI-high cancers.

Abstract B138: Prognostic value of PTEN loss for second-line paclitaxel treatment efficacy in metastatic gastric cancer

Abstract Introduction: For recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer, systemic chemotherapy is used for palliative purposes, and a paclitaxel- or irinotecan-based regimen is typically used in the second-line setting. Recent advances in research including the TCGA project now enable gastric cancer to be divided into four molecular subgroups, yet whether there are differences in chemotherapy response for each molecular subgroup remain largely unknown. Our aim in this study is to retrospectively compare the efficacy of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy according to molecular subtype and to evaluate prognostic value for these markers. Method: A total of 235 metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients who have been treated with second-line paclitaxel-containing regimen (paclitaxel monotherapy, FL/paclitaxel) between 2005-2017 were assessed. Archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks obtained before the start of paclitaxel treatment were examined for EGFR, HER2, and PTEN status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER2 positivity was defined as either IHC 3+ or 2+ with amplification confirmed by FISH/SISH, and EGFR positivity was defined as IHC 3+. PTEN loss was defined as having complete loss of PTEN expression. MSI-H and EBV-positive group was excluded in this study. Treatment response was based on CT images taken every 2 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy and evaluated according to the RECIST criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated based on the starting point of second-line chemotherapy until death or disease progression, respectively. Those negative for all three markers (HER2, EGFR, PTEN loss) were categorized as genome stable (GS)-like molecular group. Result: Patients were classified into subgroups based on HER2, EGFR, and PTEN expression; 19.6% (46/235) were HER2 positive, 15.0% (26/173) were EGFR positive, and PTEN loss was observed in 11.6% (20/173). Expression status for the three markers showed tendency towards mutual exclusivity. When coexpression rates were taken into account, 35.3% (61/173) showed positivity in at least one of the markers, and 64.7% (112/173) were negative for all three. This latter group, categorized as GS-like molecular group, showed a tendency towards poor overall survival compared with patients positive for at least one molecular marker, with median survival of 5.7 vs 8.8 months (P=0.012). There were no significant differences in OS or PFS in terms of HER2 and EGFR status. However, patients with PTEN loss had significantly longer overall survival than those with intact PTEN expression, with median survival time of 12.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 - 21.2) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.7-7.2), respectively (P=0.003). Conclusion: In mGC patients treated with second-line paclitaxel chemotherapy, HER2 and EGFR status had no predictive or prognostic value. Contrary to the general association of PTEN loss with poor prognosis in many solid cancers including gastric cancer, PTEN loss group showed better survival outcome for second-line paclitaxel treatment in our study. Indirect association of PTEN with other pathways of multidrug resistance or cell cycle-related molecules that ultimately affect the PI3K/Akt pathway may play a role. Further investigation is needed for specific mechanisms and factors that lead to increased paclitaxel sensitivity in the PTEN loss group. Citation Format: Kyoo Hyun Kim, Jeong Hyun Jo, Sejung Park, Minkyu Jung, Woo Sun Kwon, Jee Hung Kim, Hyo Song Kim, Seung-Hoon Beom, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sun Young Rha. Prognostic value of PTEN loss for second-line paclitaxel treatment efficacy in metastatic gastric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B138.

Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel treatment as a single agent chemotherapy following first-line cisplatin treatment in urothelial bladder cancer.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of paclitaxel following a first-line cisplatin regimen in patients with metastatic bladder cancer. The present study retrospectively evaluated the clinical effects and toxicities of second-line paclitaxel regimens following first-line cisplatin treatment in metastatic bladder cancer. A total of 42 patients with progressing metastatic urothelial bladder cancer following cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients received weekly treatment with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) with a median duration of 3 months. The overall response rate, disease control rate and median progression free survival were 9.5, 45.2 and 6.4 months, respectively. Weekly paclitaxel was well-tolerated with rare grade III or IV toxicities. Second-line weekly paclitaxel treatment following first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in urothelial metastatic bladder cancer.

Excellent clinical outcomes and retention in care for adults with HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma treated with systemic chemotherapy and integrated antiretroviral therapy in rural Malawi.

IntroductionHIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (HIV-KS) is the most common cancer in Malawi. In 2008, the non-governmental organization, Partners In Health, and the Ministry of Health established the Neno Kaposi Sarcoma Clinic (NKSC) to treat HIV-KS in rural Neno district. We aimed to evaluate 12-month clinical outcomes and retention in care for HIV-KS patients in the NKSC, and to describe our implementation model, which featured protocol-guided chemotherapy, integrated antiretroviral therapy (ART) and psychosocial support delivered by community health workers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data from 114 adult HIV-KS patients who received ART and ≥1 chemotherapy cycle in the NKSC between March 2008 and February 2012.ResultsAt enrolment 97% of patients (n/N=103/106) had advanced HIV-KS (stage T1). Most patients were male (n/N=85/114, 75%) with median age 36 years (interquartile range, IQR: 29–42). Patients started ART a median of 77 days prior to chemotherapy (IQR: 36–252), with 97% (n/N=105/108) receiving nevirapine/lamivudine/stavudine. Following standardized protocols, we treated 20 patients (18%) with first-line paclitaxel and 94 patients (82%) with bleomycin plus vincristine (BV). Of the 94 BV patients, 24 (26%) failed to respond to BV requiring change to second-line paclitaxel. A Division of AIDS grade 3/4 adverse event occurred in 29% of patients (n/N=30/102). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n/N=17/102, 17%). Twelve months after chemotherapy initiation, 83% of patients (95% CI: 74–89%) were alive, including 88 (77%) retained in care. Overall survival (OS) at 12 months did not differ by initial chemotherapy regimen (p=0.6). Among patients with T1 disease, low body mass index (BMI) (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR=4.10, 95% CI: 1.06–15.89) and 1 g/dL decrease in baseline haemoglobin (aHR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.03–2.25) were associated with increased death or loss to follow-up at 12 months.ConclusionsThe NKSC model resulted in infrequent adverse events, low loss to follow-up and excellent OS. Our results suggest it is safe, effective and feasible to provide standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens from the developed world, integrated with ART, to treat HIV-KS in rural Malawi. Baseline BMI and haemoglobin may represent important patient characteristics associated with HIV-KS survival in rural sub-Saharan Africa.

Safety and continuity of second- and third-line therapy with paclitaxel or irinotecan for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

In the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, the prolongation of survival depends on the use of second-line therapy, with paclitaxel (PTX) or irinotecan (CPT-11) as the key agents. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety and continuity of weekly PTX and CPT-11 monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A total of 62 patients who had received PTX or CPT-11 for gastric cancer at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 47 patients who received PTX as second-line therapy, 13 (27.7%) received third-line therapy with CPT-11. Second-line PTX and third-line CPT-11 were discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) in 27 and 7 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the performance status (PS) in 20 and 4 cases, respectively. Only 1 case of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) was reported for third-line CPT-11. Furthermore, of the 15 patients who received CPT-11 as second-line treatment, 11 (73.3%) then received PTX as third-line treatment. Second-line CPT-11 and third-line PTX were discontinued due to PD in 9 and 6 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the PS in 4 and 5 cases, respectively, whereas there was only 1 case of discontinuation due to AEs for second-line CPT-11. Severe AEs for PTX and CPT-11 were infrequent; however, the frequency of diarrhea was high when PTX was administered as third-line therapy (63.6%), whereas the frequency of malaise was high when CPT-11 was administered as second- (73.3%) and third-line (76.9%) therapy. In conclusion, severe AEs due to PTX and CPT-11 as second- and third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer are infrequent and patients are generally able to continue treatment. However, the possibility of diarrhea with third-line PTX and malaise with second- and third-line CPT-11 treatment should be considered when planning chemotherapy.

Triplet chemotherapy with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Background: Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin regimen, and gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen are widely used for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinomas (UCs). However, a standard treatment for patients who fail these firstline chemotherapies is unavailable. We examined the efficacy and safety of secondline paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin (PCG) chemotherapy in Japanese patients. Methods: Between 2004 and 2010, 25 patients with metastatic UCs who failed to respond to platinumbased regimens were treated with PCG. They received intravenous paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 2 of every 21 day course. We retrospectively collected patients’ clinical and pathological data and evaluated adverse effects and survivals. Results: Patients underwent 95 PCG cycles in all (average, 3.8 cycles per patient). One patient (4%) achieved complete response, 5 (20%) showed partial response, 8 (42%) had disease stabilization, and 5 (26%) had disease progression. Median overall survival was 8.5 months. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of grade ≥ 3 were observed in 68% and 56% of patients, respectively. No treatment related death occurred. Multivariate analysis revealed that hemoglobin levels 1.73 m2) were significant risk factors for overall survival. Conclusion: PCG chemotherapy in the secondline setting potentially contributed to good prognosis in selected patients with relatively significant but tolerable toxicity.

Second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and doxifluridine after failure of S-1 in elderly patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

There is no standard second-line treatment for patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (URGC) in the event that first-line treatment fails. Moreover, the benefits of second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to identify the benefits of the second-line paclitaxel (PTX) plus doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) regimen for URGC in elderly patients in comparison to nonelderly patients. We retrospectively examined the clinical outcomes of the second-line PTX plus 5'-DFUR regimen in patients with URGC, who had previously been treated with S-1-based first-line chemotherapy. A total of 27 patients (10 elderly, ≥70years old; 17 nonelderly, <70years old) were enrolled in the study. The clinical benefit rate (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) in the elderly group was 6 of 10 (60%), and that of the nonelderly group was 9 of 17 (53%). Age had no statistically significant influence on the response rate, and no grade 4 adverse events were observed in either group. In addition, the median survival time was 12.2months in both groups. Although it remains unclear whether second-line chemotherapy contributes to survival in patients with URGC, the combination of PTX plus 5'-DFUR might be the treatment of choice for second-line chemotherapy in both elderly and nonelderly patients who have already received an S-1-based first-line treatment.

Second-line paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer initially treated with cisplatin: a study by the European Lung Cancer Working Party

In the context of a phase III trial comparing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sequential to conventional administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and paclitaxel, we evaluated the activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy and investigated any relation of its efficacy with the type of failure after cisplatin. Patients received three courses of induction GIP (gemcitabine, ifosfamide, cisplatin). Non-progressing patients were randomised between three further courses of GIP or three courses of paclitaxel. Second-line paclitaxel was given to patients with primary failure (PF) to GIP and to those progressing after randomisation to further GIP (secondary failure or SF). One hundred sixty patients received second-line paclitaxel. Response rates were 7.7% for PF and 11.6% for SF (P=0.42). Median survival times (calculated from paclitaxel start) were 4.1 and 7.1 months for PF and SF (P=0.002). In multivariate analysis, three variables were independently associated with better survival: SF (hazard ratio (HR)=1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–2.22; P=0.02), normal haemoglobin level (HR=1.56, 95% CI 1.08–2.26; P=0.02) and minimal weight loss (HR=1.79, 95% CI 1.26–2.55; P=0.001). Paclitaxel in NSCLC patients, whether given for primary or for SF after cisplatin-based chemotherapy, demonstrates activity similar to other drugs considered active as second-line therapy.

Paclitaxel for anthracycline-resistant AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: clinical and angiogenic correlations

BackgroundMurine data indicate that angiogenesis is central to the aetiopathogenesis of Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS). Therefore, we measured angiogenic cytokines and growth factors in patients with AIDS-related KS during treatment with both antiretrovirals and second-line paclitaxel chemotherapy. Cytokines measured included tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the interleukins IL-2, -6 and -12. Patients and methodsEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were carried out to measure plasma cytokine levels in 17 patients with AIDS-related KS who had progressed within 6 months of receiving liposomal anthracyclines and were treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Measurements were carried out before progression, at commencement and at the completion of paclitaxel. ResultsThe objective response rate to paclitaxel was 71% (95% confidence interval 60% to 81%). In 17 patients with AIDS-related KS, we observed eight partial responses and four complete responses. Patients with AIDS Clinical Trial Group stage T1 disease had higher plasma VEGF (P = 0.05) and lower plasma TNF-α levels (P = 0.05) than patients with earlier stage T0 KS. There were no correlations between plasma cytokines (bFGF, VEGF, TNF-α, and IL-2,-6 and -12) and the CD4 and CD8 cell counts or HIV-1 RNA viral load. Response to paclitaxel was associated with a fall in plasma IL-6 levels (P = 0.04) but no change in other cytokines. There were no significant changes in CD4, CD8, CD16/56, CD19 cell counts and HIV-1 viral loads during chemotherapy. ConclusionsAngiogenic cytokines may correlate with KS disease extent but not with cellular immune function or HIV viraemia. Response to paclitaxel therapy correlates with a fall in plasma IL-6 levels and recent data indicate this may be a surrogate marker of KS-associated herpesvirus viral load. Overall, clinical response in KS correlates poorly with known angiogenic cytokines.