Second-line Chemotherapy Regimen Research Articles

Combination of anlotinib and second-line chemotherapy as surrogate to reduce immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

To study the clinical effects of anlotinib combined with second-line chemotherapy (SLC) on immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this retrospective study, the medical records of 106 patients with advanced NSCLC admitted to the Lianyungang First People's Hospital from November 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Amongst 106 patients, 53 patients received second-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens (SLC group), and 53 patients received anlotinib combined with SLC (ASLC group). Prognosis, levels of immune cells and inflammatory cytokine, and adverse reactions were analyzed. Clinical efficacy of the ASLC group was significantly higher than the SLC group (p<0.05). After treatment, patients in the ASLC group exhibited significantly higher levels of CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+ compared to those in the SLC group (p<0.05), while the difference in CD8+ level between the two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). After treatment, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the ASLC group were lower compared to the SLC group (p<0.05). In patients with advanced NSCLC, anlotinib combined with SLC is associated with higher levels of immune cells and reduced inflammatory factors. This treatment regimen, thus, can reduce immunosuppression and improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study.

Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy, including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and NALIRIFOX, for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC). In addition, the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC. Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, respectively. Demographic and clinical features, except age and liver metastasis, were comparable between the two groups (P < 0.05). The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy, respectively (HR = 1.244, 95% CI = 1.090-1.419; P < 0.001). The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care, respectively (HR = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.677-0.867; P < 0.001). The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy. A 5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.

Abstract 5882: Targeting vulnerabilities of drug-tolerant persister cells in gastric cancer

Abstract Cytotoxic drugs often fail to eradicate cancers due to the presence of treatment-persistent tumor cells that represent a reservoir for relapse. These “residual” cancer cells escape from chemotherapy- induced death by entering a reversible slow proliferation state, known as drug tolerant persister (DTP) state. Although improvement of treatment options achieved a survival benefit, Gastric Cancer (GC) is still endowed with poor prognosis. Surgery and neo/adjuvant chemotherapy remain the keystone of treatment. However, most patients with advanced cancer relapse even after complete surgical resection, suggesting a critical role for DTP cells. We obtained GC DTP cells from primary cells upon first- and second-line chemotherapy regimens (FLOT and FOLFIRI). Cells were treated with doses corresponding to the drug maximal plasmatic concentration. At the end of the treatment, cells were left without drugs (washout). During this window of time, when cells had regrown, they were re-challenged with chemotherapy and resulted still sensitive to the treatments, thus fulfilling the criteria for bona fide DTP cells. GC DTPs showed increased expression of markers associated with gastric stem cells (i.e. LGR5), downregulation of proliferative markers (i.e. Ki67) and decreased levels of PS6, evaluated as a readout of mTOR activation. Interestingly, DTPs resulted positive to X-gal-based β-galactosidase staining, suggesting a chemotherapy-induced senescence-like status. RNA-seq analysis and gene expression arrays allowed the identification of genes specifically down/upregulated in DTP cells. Using the intuitive enrichment analysis web-based tool Enrichr, we discovered that 54/173 of the downregulated genes characterizing the persister state were targets of a single miRNA. By quantitative real-time PCR, we validated the expression of this miR in all the models of FOLFIRI- and FLOT-obtained persister cells and we found it strongly upregulated (up to 8-fold), highlighting its possible contribute in the establishment of the persister state. Since among the target genes of this miR there are genes involved in the Homolougus Recombination (HR) system, we performed TaqMan™ Array assay for Human DNA repair gene expression on FOLFIRI-obtained DTPs. We identified a significant downregulation of genes strictly correlated to the HR machinery, suggesting that the FOLFIRI-induced persister cells can temporarily enter in a “BRCAness” status that may be used for a synthetic lethality approach using PARP inhibitors. Targeting the drug tolerant persister state is an essential approach to diminish cancer cells when they are potentially in their most vulnerable state. Citation Format: Elisabetta Puliga, Lisa Negro, Martina Olivero, Claudia Orrù, Fabrizio Maina, Daniela Conticelli, Simona Corso, Silvia Giordano. Targeting vulnerabilities of drug-tolerant persister cells in gastric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5882.

5 signature genes revealed by single-cell profiling identified unique immune subtypes affecting the prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer (OC) ranks among the most prevalent gynecological malignancies, with surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy constituting primary treatment modalities. However, despite advancements, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has yielded suboptimal outcomes. The pressing need to identify biomarkers predictive of clinical prognosis underscores our objective. We aim to discern gene signatures and establish prognostic subgroups, specifically in the context of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, guiding clinical decision-making. We used the Tumor Immunotherapy Gene Expression Resource (TIGER) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases to extract signature genes of prognostic significance. Unsupervised consensus clustering was employed to classify patients based on these signature genes. The Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) database, along with the R packages "maftools" and "ESTIMATE" facilitated immune infiltration estimation. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis were implemented to probe immune-related cell signaling pathways among distinct subtypes. The Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) database was used to assess immunotherapy effects, while the R package "OncoPredict" evaluated drug sensitivity differences among subtypes. We identified five prognostically influential genes in ovarian cancer: IGFBP7, JCHAIN, CCDC80, VSIG4, and MS4A1. Utilizing these signature genes, we categorized TCGA-OV patients into five clusters, each associated with varying clinical prognoses. Notably, 2 clusters exhibited superior prognoses, accompanied by enhanced immune cell infiltration. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed their heightened enrichment in cellular immunity and immune cell interaction pathways. Given the elevated expression levels of multiple immune checkpoint molecules, these clusters may substantially benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Additionally, chemotherapy sensitivity analysis indicated their favorable responses to first or second-line chemotherapy regimens. We subclustered ovarian cancer patients by 5 signature genes obtained from the Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset, which demonstrated a good typing effect. Patients in the two molecular subtypes showed better survival, higher immune cell infiltration, and higher drug sensitivity. This meticulous typing may help clinicians to quickly assess the prognosis of patients and the response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Relationship between fluoropyrimidine (FPD) exposure and outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) with or without bevacizumab (BEV) in the phase 3 SUNLIGHT trial.

114 Background: Standard first- and second-line chemotherapy regimens for mCRC are FPD-based. In the phase 3 SUNLIGHT trial, the addition of BEV to FTD/TPI significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with FTD/TPI alone in patients with mCRC who had received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens. Here, we assessed the effect of timing of prior exposure to FPD on efficacy outcomes among patients treated in SUNLIGHT. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis, OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed in patients treated with FPD within 2 months of enrollment (&lt;2 months FPD-free exposure) and patients who had not received FPD for ≥2 months prior to enrollment (≥2 months FPD-free exposure). Differences in OS between FTD/TPI + BEV and FTD/TPI alone were assessed in each subgroup. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare differences in OS/PFS; DCR was compared using Fisher's exact tests. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 246 patients randomized to FTD/TPI + BEV, 79 had ≥2 months FPD-free exposure and 167 had &lt;2 months FPD-free exposure. Median OS (95% CI) was 11.8 months (9.4–not estimable) for patients with ≥2 months FPD-free exposure and 10.5 months (8.6–11.3) for patients with &lt;2 months FPD-free exposure ( P=0.095); median PFS was 6.7 months (4.6–7.5) and 5.2 months (4.2–5.7), respectively ( P=0.043). The DCR among patients treated with FTD/TPI + BEV was 79.8% for patients with ≥2 months FPD-free exposure and 64.7% for patients with &lt;2 months FPD-free exposure, with a between-group difference of 15.1% (95% CI: 3.6%–26.5%; P=0.018). Of 246 patients randomized to FTD/TPI alone, 91 had ≥2 months FPD-free exposure and 155 had &lt;2 months FPD-free exposure. Median OS was 9.3 months (6.7–10.9) and 6.8 months (6.0–7.8) for patients with ≥2 and &lt;2 months FPD-free exposure, respectively ( P=0.106) and median PFS was 3.6 months (2.1–3.9) and 2.1 months (2.0–2.7) ( P=0.002). The between-group difference in the DCR was 13.8% (50.6% vs. 36.7% for ≥2 and &lt;2 months FPD-free exposure; 95% CI: 1.0%–26.6%; P=0.044). Compared with FTD/TPI alone, FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in longer OS in both the ≥2-month (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93) and &lt;2-month (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45–0.78) groups, respectively. Conclusions: Owing to imbalances between the ≥2- and &lt;2-month FPD-free exposure groups, the data need to be interpreted with caution. However, with both FTD/TPI + BEV and FTD/TPI alone, OS, PFS, and DCR were numerically higher in patients with ≥2 months FPD-free exposure than in those with &lt;2 months FU-free exposure, potentially reflecting the better prognosis of the former group. The survival benefits of adding BEV to FTD/TPI were maintained regardless of the timing of exposure to FPD prior to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04737187 .

Fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab or TAS-102 as third-line or above treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study.

For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the efficacy of third-line or above treatments is not ideal. Combining targeted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) biological agents with chemotherapy or anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) treatment can bring longer survival benefits to patients with mCRC compared with the application of a single drug. In this study, fruquintinib was used as the research drug, and the main purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab (FS) or trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) (FT) in the third-line or above treatment in mCRC patients. Based on real-world clinical practice, mCRC patients who progressed after second-line or higher-line chemotherapy regimens and received FS or FT as third-line or above treatment from December 2020 to November 2022 were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Safety, disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary end points. In the FS group, 47 patients received FS, and in the FT group, 45 patients received FT. The DCR values in the FS and FT groups were 80.9% (38/47) and 55.6% (25/45), respectively (P<0.05). The median PFS (mPFS) in the FS group was 6.0 months, and the mPFS in the FT group was 3.5 months (P<0.05). Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2 in severity. As a third-line or above regimen in mCRC patients, compared to FT, treatment with FS provides a higher DCR and longer mPFS and is better tolerated. The combination of fruquintinib and sintilimab may become a new treatment option for mCRC patients.

Prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens and higher total bilirubin levels are risk factors for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer receiving weekly paclitaxel and ramucirumab therapy: a single center retrospective study

BackgroundWeekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab (wPTX + RAM) therapy is recommended as the standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (GC) or esophagogastric junction cancer. Recent subgroup analysis of the RAINBOW trial revealed a higher frequency of severe neutropenia due to wPTX + RAM in Japanese compared to Western patients. However, no risk factors for severe neutropenia have been identified.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included patients with advanced/unresectable gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer who received wPTX + RAM after failure to respond to platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet chemotherapy between June 2015 and April 2020. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors associated with grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). In addition, we investigated the relationship between the number of risk factors and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsAmong 66 patients who met the inclusion criteria, grade 4 neutropenia and FN occurred in 21 (31.8%) and 12 (18.2%) patients, respectively. Prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens was identified as an independent risk factor for developing grade 4 neutropenia (odds ratio (OR) 20.034, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.216–124.807, P = 0.001). Total bilirubin of > 1.5 mg/dL (OR 31.316, 95% CI 2.052–477.843, P = 0.013) and prior treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimen (OR 12.502, 95% CI 1.141–137.022, P = 0.039) were identified as independent risk factors for developing FN. Next, we classified patients with 0, 1, 2 risk factor(s) as RF-0, RF-1, and RF-2 subgroups, respectively, and compared the PFS and OS among the three subgroups. PFS was not significantly different among the three subgroups, whereas OS was significantly shorter in the RF-2 subgroup (median 1.4 month, 95% CI 0.0–5.3 month) than in the RF-0 subgroup (median 10.2 month, 95% CI 6.8–13.5 month, P < 0.01 vs RF-2) and RF-1 subgroup (median 13.3 month, 95% CI 10.9–15.7 month, P < 0.01 vs RF-2).ConclusionsCareful monitoring for grade 4 neutropenia and FN is needed for patients receiving wPTX + RAM therapy who have a history of treatment with oxaliplatin-containing regimens and higher total bilirubin levels.

Ramucirumab plus irinotecan / leucovorin / 5-FU versus ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, who failed one prior line of palliative chemotherapy: the phase II/III RAMIRIS study (AIO-STO-0415)

BackgroundPaclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab is the standard of care second-line therapy in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). As the number of taxane pretreated patients in the perioperative or first-line setting is increasing, it is unknown whether these patients benefit from re-applying a taxane in using the combination of paclitaxel and ramucirumab. Furthermore, the rates of neurotoxicity with first-line FOLFOX or FLOT range from 30%–70%, making second-line taxane‐containing therapy less suitable to a meaningful portion of patients. This patient group is likely to benefit from a taxane-free second-line chemotherapy regimen, such as FOLFIRI and ramucirumab (FOLFIRI-Ram). Therefore, the RAMIRIS phase III trial evaluates the effects of the regimen of FOLFIRI-Ram in the second-line treatment after a taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEA.MethodsThe RAMIRIS trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II/III study comparing treatment of FOLFIRI-Ram (arm A) with paclitaxel and ramucirumab (arm B). The Phase II is already closed with 111 enrolled patients. In the phase III, 318 taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to FOLFIRI (5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h i.v., irinotecan 180 mg/m2 i.v.; 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 i.v.; on day 1 and 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm B). The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and objective overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety and quality of life as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire.DiscussionThe already completed RAMIRIS phase II demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of FOLFIRI-Ram. Especially docetaxel-pretreated patients seemed to markedly benefit from FOLFIRI-Ram, with favorable response- and PFS rates and lower toxicity. This offers a rationale for the phase III trial. If the RAMIRIS III trial transfers and confirms the results, they will affect the current treatment guidelines, recommending the combination therapy of FOLFIRI-Ram for taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA.Trial registrationNCT03081143 Date of registration: 13.11.2015

Immunotherapy in oncogynaecology

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have deeply changed treatment paradigm of many tumor types, notably by providing long-term remissions, even in the metastatic setting. These immunotherapies aim to restore T-cells activity against tumour cells, in particular via the inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 interaction. As for lung or renal carcinomas, and melanomas, the management of endometrial and uterine cervical cancers has been disrupted by PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors efficacy. In locally advanced or metastatic cervical carcinomas, the combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated improved overall and progression-free survival in all subgroups of patients, and became the new standard of care. Regarding endometrial cancers, while single-agent immunotherapies have shown very limited activity in an unselected population, dostarlimab and pembrolizumab have been associated with remarkable antitumor activity in case of microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), detected in around 30% of patients. Finally, in endometrial cancer that has progressed after first-line chemotherapy, the association of pembrolizumab with an oral antiangiogenic kinase inhibitor (lenvatinib) has demonstrated its superiority over second-line chemotherapy regimens, regardless molecular subgroups, and has become the new standard of care in this indication.

Precise prediction of the sensitivity of platinum chemotherapy in SCLC: Establishing and verifying the feasibility of a CT-based radiomics nomogram.

To develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram that can provide individualized pretreatment prediction of the response to platinum treatment in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A total of 134 SCLC patients who were treated with platinum as a first-line therapy were eligible for this study, including 51 patients with platinum resistance (PR) and 83 patients with platinum sensitivity (PS). The variance threshold, SelectKBest, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were applied for feature selection and model construction. The selected texture features were calculated to obtain the radiomics score (Rad-score), and the predictive nomogram model was composed of the Rad-score and the clinical features selected by multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were used to assess the performance of the nomogram. The Rad-score was calculated using 10 radiomic features, and the resulting radiomics signature demonstrated good discrimination in both the training set (area under the curve [AUC], 0.727; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.627-0.809) and the validation set (AUC, 0.723; 95% CI, 0.562-0.799). To improve diagnostic effectiveness, the Rad-score created a novel prediction nomogram by combining CA125 and CA72-4. The radiomics nomogram showed good calibration and discrimination in the training set (AUC, 0.900; 95% CI, 0.844-0.947) and the validation set (AUC, 0.838; 95% CI, 0.534-0.735). The radiomics nomogram proved to be clinically beneficial based on decision curve analysis. We developed and validated a radiomicsnomogram model for predicting the response to platinum in SCLC patients. The outcomes of this model can provide useful suggestions for the development of tailored and customized second-line chemotherapy regimens.

Dinutuximab beta combined with chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma.

Prognosis in children with refractory and relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma is poor. Only a minority of patients obtain remission when treated with second-line chemotherapy regimens. Chemotherapy combined with anti-GD2 antibodies has previously been shown to increase response and survival rates. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 25 patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma who were treated with irinotecan/temozolomide chemotherapy in combination with the anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab beta. The therapy resulted in an objective response rate of 64%, with 32% of patients achieving a complete response. Response to treatment was observed in patients with refractory disease (n=5) and those with first (n=12) or consecutive (n=8) relapses, including patients with progressing disease. In four patients, best response was achieved after more than 5 cycles, suggesting that some patients may benefit from prolonged chemotherapy and dinutuximab beta treatment. Fourteen of our 25 patients had previously received dinutuximab beta, four of whom achieved complete response and six partial response (objective response rate 71%). The therapy was well tolerated, even in heavily pre-treated patients and those who had previously received dinutuximab beta treatment. Toxicities were comparable to those previously reported for the individual therapies, and no discontinuations due to toxicities occurred. Combination of chemotherapy with dinutuximab beta is a promising treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma and should be further explored in clinical studies.

Efficacy of the third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

711 Background: First-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) have improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) and nano-liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-FU/leucovorin is proven as the second-line agents. The current study aims to assess the efficacy of the third-line palliative chemotherapy in APC. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in a single tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2020. The enrolled patients have APC who received the first and second-line chemotherapy. To fine the efficacy of the third-line chemotherapy, Kaplan Meier curve with cox-regression analysis was performed. Results: Of total 1,152 patients with pancreatic cancer, 362 patients were enrolled. Of these, 125 received the third-line chemotherapy and 238 received only supportive care after progression of the second-line chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 60.3 years (range 36.0 – 86.0) and males were 52.0%. The first-line chemotherapy regimen was FOLFIRINOX (85, 68.0%), GNP (33, 26.4%), and others (7, 5.6%). The second-line chemotherapy regimen was GNP (55, 44.0%), FOLFIRINOX (34, 27.2%). As the third-line regimen, TS-1 and nal-IRI plus 5-FU/leucovorin were 73 (58.4%) and 20 (16.0%). The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 18.0 months in all patients (95% CI, 14.6 – 21.4). The median OS after progression of the second-line therapy were 15.1 (95% CI, 12.8 – 17.5) and 8.5 weeks (95% CI, 7.7 – 9.4, p=0.007) between the patients with the third-line chemotherapy and supportive care only. Of the patients with the third-line chemotherapy, female showed the significant longer OS than male (12.4 (95% CI 10.2-14.6) vs. 6.6 weeks (95% CI 13.4-19.7), p=0.042). Conclusions: The current study suggested that proceeding with the third-line chemotherapy could be recommended in some patients. Females showed significantly more benefit than males. Further research on the selection for patient who will get the benefit from the third-line therapy is necessary.

Second-Line Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Study.

Second-line chemotherapy is recommended for patients who have disease progression after first-line chemotherapy and have a good performance status. The aim of our study is thus to determine which chemotherapy regimen is more appropriate for second-line gastric cancer treatment. Patients were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma pathology; no previous treatment for local gastric cancer (surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy); received first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer and had the disease progress afterward; had adequate organ functions for second-line chemotherapy; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2; and were HER-2 negative. The patients were examined in three groups according to the second-line chemotherapy regimen they received. These three groups were compared in terms of overall and progression-free survival. The three groups were statistically similar in overall survival, which was the primary endpoint of the study; the median overall survival was 5months in the FOLFIRI group (n = 79), 6.5months in the platinum-based group (n = 55), and 5.6months in the taxane-based group (n = 40) (p = 0.554). There was no statistical difference between the groups' progression-free survival either; the median progression-free survival time was 3.43months in the FOLFIRI group, 4months in the platinum-based group, and 2.77months in the taxane-based group (p = 0.546). There was no statistically significant difference between the three irinotecan-based, platinum-based, and taxane-based treatments. According to our study's results, the chemotherapy given in second-line treatment should be decided on an individual basis according to toxicity and cost.

CTIM-32. FIRST-IN-CHILDREN PHASE 1 TRIAL OF INDOXIMOD-BASED CHEMO-IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS: ANALYSIS OF SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND 5-YEAR OUTCOME

Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in children. We conducted a first-in-children, two-institution, Phase 1 open-label dose-confirmation study using a 3 + 3 design, with expansion cohorts, to determine the recommended pediatric dose of the IDO pathway-inhibitor indoximod (NCT02502708). DESIGN/ METHODS Eligible patients were 3-22 years old with either recurrent malignant brain tumor or newly-diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Palliative radiation, surgery or dexamethasone were allowed as needed for patient management. Separate dose-finding arms were performed for indoximod plus temozolomide (200 mg/m2/day orally for 5 days of each 28-day cycle) and for indoximod plus conformal radiation (in patients for whom re-irradiation was planned as standard-of-care). At progression, patients who were otherwise clinically stable were offered crossover to indoximod plus a second-line chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide 2.5 mg/kg/day orally and etoposide 50 mg/m2/day orally for 21 days of each 28-day cycle). RESULTS Between December 2015 and January 2019, the study enrolled 81 brain tumor patients, including newly-diagnosed DIPG (n = 13) or recurrent ependymoma (n = 27), glioblastoma/high-grade glioma (n = 19), medulloblastoma (n = 13), or other CNS tumors ( n= 9). Median follow-up was 52 months (range 39-77 months). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the pediatric indoximod dose was determined (19.2 mg/kg/dose, given twice daily). Indoximod was well tolerated and did not affect the ability to deliver chemotherapy or radiation as planned. Median overall survival was 13.6 months (n = 81). Median overall survival was 34.7 months for the subset of patients who continued indoximod with second-line chemotherapy after progression on indoximod plus temozolomide (n = 18). CONCLUSIONS Indoximod was well tolerated and could be combined with a variety of standard treatments for pediatric brain tumors. Preliminary anti-tumor activity and overall survival suggest that indoximod with standard therapy should be further evaluated in pediatric brain tumors, and potentially other pediatric solid tumors.

P1090: CAMRELIZUMAB (CAM) COMBINED WITH GEMOX CHEMOTHERAPY RESULTS IN HIGH COMPLETE METABOLIC RESPONSE RATES IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY CLASSIC HODGKIN LYMPHOMA (CHL): A PHASE II TRIAL

Background: Approximately 30-35% of patients with classic Hodgkin Lymphoma will prove refractory to frontline therapy or relapse subsequently. Traditional second-line chemotherapy regimens result in complete response rates about 20-40%. Achievement of complete metabolic response (CMR) assessed by PET/CT imaging prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) predicts favorable progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PD‐1 antibody has shown remarkable efficacy in relapsed or refractory hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL). Aims: we designed a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD‐1 antibody camrelizumab combined with GEMOX chemotherapy in R/R HL patients. The preliminary results had been obtained. Methods: This is an open‐label, single‐center, non‐randomized, phase 2 study (NCT04239170). The main inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18, ECOG < 2, histopathology confirmed classical HL, no more than 3 lines of previous chemotherapy treatment, having measurable lesion(s) assessed by Lugano 2014 criteria and preparing to receive autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients were treated with 2 cycles of camrelizumab (CAM, 200 mg IV, q2w) followed by 2 cycles (28-day cycle) of CAM (IV, day 1 and day 15) combined with standard GEMOX (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100mg/m2, IV, day 1 and day 15). Patients achieved CR were transferred to stem cell mobilization/collection stage; patients achieved PR/SD could have another cycle of CAM plus GEMOX, patients who achieved PR/CR underwent stem cell mobilization/collection. For patients waiting more than 4 weeks for ASCT, 1-2 cycles of CAM monotherapy were allowed. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieved PET‐CT‐confirmed complete response (CR) according to Lugano 2014 criteria. Results: From March 2020 to December 2021, 30 patients were enrolled. One patient withdrew informed consent. The median age of remaining 29 patients was 34 years old (ranged from 22 to 63), with a male‐to‐female ratio of 16:13. At the first tumor response evaluation, 69% (20/29) patients achieved CR and 17% (5/29) patients achieved partial response (PR), resulting an overall response rate (ORR) of 86%. Only one patient had progression disease (PD). The patients who achieved PR or stable disease (SD) received an additional cycle of CAM plus GEMOX treatment, and one patient who had PR in the first evaluation was found to achieve CR. Up to now, collection of the autologous hematopoietic stem cells was completed in thirteen patients. With a cutoff date of February 10, 2022, the 1-year (progression-free survival) PFS rate was 74% and the 1-year (overall survival) OS rate was 100%, median PFS and OS were not reached with too few events (Figure). Most adverse events (AEs) were of grade 1 to 2. Common AEs included reactive capillary endothelial proliferation (RCEP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/ aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation, vomiting, nausea, hyperuricemia (all > 30%). Hematologic AEs included neutropenia (> 34%). No grade 4 or above AEs occurred. Grade 3 AE occurred in 6 patients, including 1 pulmonary infection, 1 nausea, 1 fever, 1 hypertriglyceridemia, 1 ALT elevation, and 1 neutropenia. Serious adverse events included 1 case of interstitial pneumonia (grade 2) and 1 case of fever (grade 3) resulting in hospitalization. Image:Summary/Conclusion: Camrelizumab combined with GEMOX chemotherapy showed encouraging clinical efficacy and tolerable toxicity in R/R HL patients and merited further study.

P-218 FOLFIRI as third- or later-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in Northern Thailand

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin, and FOLFOX (fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) are recognized as the standard first- and second-line chemotherapy regimen in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, there are significant number of patients progressing after these treatments, and also there are no available data regarding the benefit of the later-line treatment in Thai patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI (fluorouracil and irinotecan) after failure from two or more lines of chemotherapy.

A descriptive study on the treatment and outcomes of patients with platinum-sensitive, advanced, BRCA- or PALB2-related pancreatic cancer who have progressed on rucaparib.

4131 Background: We recently reported the results of a single arm phase II study of maintenance rucaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 (NCT 03140670; Reiss, JCO 2021). However, optimal treatment following progression on PARP inhibitors (PARPi) has not been defined. Here, we report a descriptive study of post-progression treatment and outcomes of this patient population. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and germline or somatic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2mutations treated with at least 16 weeks of platinum-based chemotherapy without progression were enrolled and treated with rucaparib until progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of progression, patients were treated with physician-choice chemotherapy. Here we evaluate the objective response rates (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (PFS2) calculated from trial enrollment and progression free survival on chemotherapy (PFS) by regimen were secondary endpoints. Time-to-event was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and censored at date of last clinic visit, with a cutoff date of 12/10/21. Results: The trial enrolled 42 patients; 31 patients had progressed. Of these, 22 received second-line chemotherapy: nine were treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen, nine were treated with a cisplatin-based regimen, and four were treated with non-platinum regimens. Demographics were balanced between those who received platinum versus non-platinum. All patients who received second-line chemotherapy regimens met the PFS2 endpoint and all but one patient had died at time of data cutoff. No patients had a complete response, five patients had a partial response (PR). By regimen, 1/9 patients treated with cisplatin had a PR, 3/9 treated with oxaliplatin had a PR, and 1/4 patients treated with non-platinum had a PR. OS, PFS2, PFS, and ORR results by regimen are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this small sample of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with progressive disease on PARPi, chemotherapy retains some activity. Further study to identify predictors of response and/or resistance to post-PARPi treatment are underway. [Table: see text]

The efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundApatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-2, which was recently used in a phase II clinical trial for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC). However, there is no consistent conclusion on its efficacy and safety on rmNPC. This study conducted a meta-analysis of clinical research on the efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of rmNPC.MethodsIn April 2022, the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), CMB, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched, and relevant research literature were screened and analyzed. The clinical trial literatures using apatinib as the main single or combined treatment for rmNPC patients were selected and combined with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and other efficacy and safety indicators.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 12 studies, including 408 patients with rmNPC. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies scale was used to evaluate the bias of the included literatures and found that the bias was low. A total of 408 rmNPC patients were included in the included literature, with 11 studies being a phase II single-arm trial and one being a phase II non-randomized controlled trial. The ORR of patients with rmNPC treated with apatinib was 41.5% (95% CI: 34.8%, 48.2%), and the DCR was 80.2% (95% CI: 70.9%, 89.6%). The median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI: 5.3, 7.4), and the median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.7, 18.9). The incidence of hypertension, hand-foot skin reaction, and proteinuria was 31% (95% CI: 19–43%), 29% (95% CI: 20–39%), and 13% (95% CI: 6–20%), respectively.DiscussionThe efficacy of apatinib in the treatment of rmNPC patients is similar to that of the previous second-line chemotherapy drugs, but since most studies are phase II single-arm studies, the advantages and disadvantages of the existing second-line chemotherapy regimens cannot be determined.

Poor Treatment Outcomes with Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Synovial Sarcoma

Introduction: Synovial sarcoma (SS) predominantly affects adolescents and young adults. Doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide therapy is the standard first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic SS. However, there is no standard second-line chemotherapy regimen. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the outcomes of second-line chemotherapy for patients with SS. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 61 patients with unresectable or metastatic SS who had received first-line chemotherapy at our institution between 1997 and 2017. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy were included in the analysis. Outcomes of the chemotherapy were evaluated. Results: Among the 61 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, we identified 32 patients who received second-line chemotherapy. Most patients (62.5%) were under 40 years of age. Regarding second-line chemotherapy regimens, 6 (18.8%) patients were treated with doxorubicin with/without ifosfamide, 6 (18.8%) with ifosfamide and etoposide, 4 (12.5%) with docetaxel and gemcitabine, 5 (15.6%) with pazopanib, 2 (6.2%) with trabectedin, and 1 (3.1%) with eribulin. The overall response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for all patients was 9.4%. Eleven patients (34.3%) achieved disease-control for >6 months. The median follow-up duration was 15.2 months. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 33.1% and 67.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Our exploratory study revealed that the response rate of second-line chemotherapy regimens for patients with SS was 9.4%. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop more active therapeutic regimens for SSs.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ObjectiveTo undertake a meta-analysis of the treatment effects of different second-line chemotherapy regimens compared with FOLFIRINOX (FOL [folinic acid], F [fluorouracil], IRIN [irinotecan], OX [oxaliplatin]) after failure of gemcitabine-based first-line therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.MethodsThis meta-analysis searched electronic databases, including Embase®, Medline, PubMed® and the Cochrane library, for eligible studies that reported the use of FOLFIRINOX and other drug regimens as second-line chemotherapy after failure of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Pooled analyses for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs) were undertaken.ResultsThe analysis included six studies with a total of 858 patients. Compared with the three other second-line regimens, FOLFIRINOX had a significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52, 0.89) and OS (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59, 0.86); and a significantly better ORR (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23, 0.80) and DCR (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58, 0.88). However, grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequently reported in patients administered FOLFIRINOX compared with the other three regimens.ConclusionFOLFIRINOX is recommended as a second-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer that have failed on gemcitabine-based first-line therapy.Research Registry number: reviewregistry1300