Second-generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Egfr-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Osimertinib: Real-World Outcomes and Insights.

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), demonstrated superior efficacy over first-generation TKIs in the FLAURA trial, resulting in its approval as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of these trial results requires an evaluation of sequential therapeutic strategies. Methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study utilized data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) platform, which includes information on patients treated for lung cancer since 2015. Out of 39,974 patients in the database, 624 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first-line (L1, n = 198) or second-line (L2, n = 426) treatment after first- or second-generation TKIs (n = 1262) were identified. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, and disease progression were examined. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: In the study population (n = 624), 73.4% were female, with a median age of 70 years (range 28-93). Brain metastases at the start of osimertinib treatment were observed in 282 patients. ECOG PS-2 was reported in 29.4% of patients. The T790M mutation in exon 20 was identified in 257/426 patients (60.3%) receiving osimertinib in L2. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI [10.7-14.7]) for L1 and 7.4 months (95% CI [6.2-8.7]) for L2. Median overall survival (OS) from advanced diagnosis was 28.5 months (95% CI [26.3-38.7]) for osimertinib L1 and 29.9 months (95% CI [28.6-31.8]) for osimertinib L2 (HR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.75-1.16]; p = 0.50). For L1, median OS was 27.1 months (95% CI [22.0-30.2]) for patients with cerebral metastases and 38.7 months (95% CI [26.3-52.8]) for those without (HR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.48-1.11]; p = 0.15). Discussion: Patients in the real-world ESME database exhibited a poorer prognosis compared to those in the FLAURA trial. The presence of cerebral metastases at diagnosis worsens the prognosis.

In-depth exploration of the focus issues of TKI combined with radiotherapy for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis: a systematic analysis based on literature metrology, meta-analysis, and real-world observational data

BackgroundThere is a growing interest in utilizing a combination of brain radiotherapy (RT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients diagnosed with brain metastases (BM) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). The current status of this treatment strategy remains a subject of debate.MethodsWe initiated our study by conducting a comprehensive literature search using the SCI-expanded database of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). We utilized the VOSPviewer software to analyze various aspects of the research, including the year of publication, authorship, keywords, and country.Subsequently, we performed an extensive and systematic literature search on popular online databases. Our primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), both quantified by hazard ratios (HRs).Additionally, for data verification, we included data from patients in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis who underwent therapeutic intervention at the Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center of Sun Yat-sen University and the Radiotherapy Department of Hanzhong Central Hospital between August 2012 and November 2021.ResultsThe bibliometric analysis revealed an increasing trend in research focused on the combination of RT and TKIs for the management of lung cancer brain metastases over the previous decade. Then, nine studies consistent with the research direction were included for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the OS (HR = 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.69–0.94; P = 0.007) and iPFS (HR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.82; P < 0.001) of the combination therapy were significantly prolonged. Finally, 168 EGFR-mutated BM advanced LAC patients in the real world were verified, and the median iPFS of the combination therapy (n = 88 and EGFR-TKIs alone (n = 80) were 16.0 and 9.0 months, respectively, (P < 0.001). The median OS was 29.0 and 27.0 months, respectively, with no dramatic difference (P = 0.188).ConclusionsResearch on EGFR-mutant LAC brain metastasis has turned towards exploring optimal treatment strategies for this condition. Our meta-analysis and real-world data analysis consistently demonstrate that combination therapy offers a substantial improvement in patient survival compared to EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Notably, among patients undergoing salvage radiotherapy (RT), our subgroup analysis reveals that those initially treated with third-generation TKIs experience more significant benefits than those treated with first- or second-generation TKIs.

Ponatinib: A Review of the History of Medicinal Chemistry behind Its Development.

The primary treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) involves first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and dasatinib. However, these medications are ineffective against mutations in the kinase domain of the ABL1 protein, particularly in the protein with the T315I mutation. To address this, ponatinib (PNT), a third-generation inhibitor, was developed. Despite its efficacy in treating the BCR-ABL1T315I mutation, the use of PNT was briefly suspended in 2013 due to serious adverse effects but was subsequently reintroduced to the market. During the drug discovery and development process, it is rare to consolidate all information into a single article, as is the case with ponatinib. This review aims to compile and chronologically organize the research on the discovery of ponatinib using medicinal chemistry tools and computational methods. It includes in silico calculations, such as the octanol/water partition coefficient (cLogP) via SwissAdme, and 2D maps of intermolecular interactions through molecular docking. This approach enhances understanding for both specialists and those interested in medicinal chemistry and pharmacology, while also contextualizing future directions for further optimizations of ponatinib, facilitating the development of new analogs of this crucial inhibitor for the treatment of CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer: Current Use and Future Prospects.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as a leading targeted cancer therapy, reducing the side effects often seen with non-targeted treatments, especially the damage to healthy cells. To tackle resistance, typically caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, four generations of TKIs have been developed. Each generation has shown improved effectiveness and fewer side effects, resulting in better patient outcomes. For example, patients on gefitinib, a first-generation TKI, experienced a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10 months compared to 5 months with conventional chemotherapy. Second-generation TKI afatinib outperformed erlotinib and extended PFS to 11.1 months compared to 6.9 months with cisplatin. Third-generation TKIs further increased survival to 38.6 months, compared to 31.8 months with first-generation TKIs. This progress demonstrates the ability of newer TKIs to overcome resistance, particularly the T790M mutation, while reducing adverse effects. Ongoing research focuses on overcoming resistance from newer mutations like C797S to further improve patient survival. These developments highlight the significant progress in TKI therapy and the continued effort to refine cancer treatment. Recent research in South Korea shows that third-generation TKIs are ineffective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the C797S mutation. Several trials have started showing promising in vitro and in vivo results, but more trials are needed before clinical approval. This review underscores notable advancements in the field of EGFR TKIs, offering a comprehensive analysis of their mechanisms of action and the progression of various TKI generations in response to resistance.

CML-399 CARDINAL: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Dose-Optimization Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of TERN-701 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

ObjectiveDespite improvements in outcomes achieved with BCR::ABL1 active-site-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treatment of chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), many patients need to switch treatments due to disease progression, intolerance, or resistance. Because active-site TKIs utilize similar mechanisms of action, novel treatment options are needed for patients. TERN-701 is a highly selective, oral, investigational, allosteric BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket. Preclinical data suggest that TERN-701 is highly potent against native BCR::ABL1 and most common BCR::ABL1 mutations, including T315I, acquired with use of second-generation active-site TKIs. CARDINAL (NCT06163430) is an open-label, global, 2-part, phase 1 study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of TERN-701 in patients with previously treated CP-CML. MethodsEligible patients are ≥18 years old with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, a confirmed diagnosis of BCR::ABL1-positive CP-CML, with or without the T315I mutation, and treatment failure/intolerance of ≥1 prior second-generation TKI (dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib). Patients intolerant of asciminib without overt resistance are eligible. Patients with CML in accelerated or blast phase are ineligible. Patients will receive TERN-701 orally once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. Part 1 (dose escalation) has been initiated and will include ≈24–36 patients assigned to sequential dose-escalation cohorts, starting at 160 mg, and optional backfill cohorts; dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian optimal interval algorithm. Primary endpoints of Part 1 include incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during the first treatment cycle and other measures of safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints include PK and efficacy measures, such as hematologic and molecular responses. Based upon the results of Part 1, ≥2 TERN-701 dose levels will be selected for further evaluation in Part 2. In Part 2 (dose expansion), ≈40 patients will be randomized to one of the selected dose levels. Part 2 primary endpoints will measure efficacy (hematologic response, molecular response, and best categorical shift in BCR::ABL1 transcript levels from baseline); secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, and PK. The study is being conducted in the US, Europe, Australia, and South Korea.

Lazertinib in EGFR-Variant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With CNS Failure to Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

EGFR-variant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a high rate of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, even with treatment with first-generation or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To investigate CNS activity with lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI. This multicenter single-arm, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted in South Korea and included patients with EGFR-variant NSCLC who had asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic brain metastases after unsuccessful treatment with first-generation or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Data were collected from June 2021 to April 2022, with a data cutoff date of December 15, 2022. Lazertinib, 240 mg, once daily. The primary end point was intracranial objective response rate (iORR) in the evaluable population according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 assessed by the investigators. Secondary end points included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and iORR in patients with T790M-negative disease and isolated CNS progression as well as overall ORR, duration of response, intracranial duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, cerebrospinal fluid penetration of lazertinib, and safety. Among 40 included patients, 25 (63%) were women, and the median (range) age was 63 (29-85) years. A total of 38 patients were evaluable for tumor response, including 12 patients with leptomeningeal metastases. At data cutoff, the median (range) follow-up was 13.6 (2.9-17.7) months. The iORR for the evaluable population was 55% (21 of 38; 95% CI, 38.3-71.4); for patients with T790M-positive disease, 80% (4 of 5; 95% CI, 28.4-99.5); for patients with T790M-negative disease, 43% (9 of 21; 95% CI, 21.8-66.0); and for patients with T790M-unknown disease, 67% (8 of 12; 95% CI, 34.9-90.1). The median iPFS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 15.2-not reached) for the evaluable population, 15.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-not reached) for the T790M-positive subgroup, 15.4 months (95% CI, 7.9-not reached) for the T790M-negative subgroup, and 18.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-not reached) for the T790M-unknown subgroup. The cerebrospinal fluid penetration rate of lazertinib was 46.2% (95% CI, 10.0-49.6), providing further support for its mechanism of intracranial response. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. In this study, lazertinib had substantial CNS activity, regardless of T790M status, against the progression of intracranial metastases with or without leptomeningeal metastases after unsuccessful treatment with first-generation or second-generation EGFR TKIs in patients with metastatic EGFR-variant NSCLC. These results suggest that using lazertinib instead of brain local treatment could be a potential strategy in patients with EGFR-variant NSCLC whose CNS metastases progressed after prior EGFR TKI treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05326425.

Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2025 update on diagnosis, therapy, and monitoring.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with an annual incidence of two cases/100 000. It accounts for approximately 15% of newly diagnosed cases of leukemia in adults. CML is characterized by a balanced genetic translocation, t(9;22) (q34;q11.2), involving a fusion of the Abelson murine leukemia (ABL1) gene from chromosome 9q34 with the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) gene on chromosome 22q11.2. This rearrangement is known as the Philadelphia chromosome. The molecular consequence of this translocation is the generation of a BCR::ABL1 fusion oncogene, which in turn translates into a BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. Four tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and nilotinib, are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML in the chronic phase (CML-CP). Clinical trials with second and third-generation TKIs in frontline CML-CP therapy reported significantly deeper and faster responses but had no impact on survival prolongation, likely because of their potent efficacy and the availability of effective TKIs salvage therapies for patients who have a cytogenetic relapse with frontline TKI therapy. All four TKIs are equivalent if the aim of therapy is to improve survival. In younger patients with high-risk disease and in whom the aim of therapy is to induce a treatment-free remission status, second-generation TKIs may be favored. For CML post-failure on frontline therapy, second-line options include second and third-generation TKIs. Although potent and selective, these TKIs exhibit unique pharmacological profiles and response patterns relative to different patient and disease characteristics, such as patients' comorbidities and financial status, disease stage, and BCR::ABL1 mutational status. Patients who develop the T315I "gatekeeper" mutation display resistance to all currently available TKIs except ponatinib, asciminib, and olverembatinib. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains an important therapeutic option for patients with CML-CP and failure (due to resistance) of at least two TKIs and for all patients in advanced-phase disease. Older patients who have a cytogenetic relapse post-failure on all TKIs can maintain long-term survival if they continue a daily most effective/least toxic TKI, with or without the addition of non-TKI anti-CML agents (hydroxyurea, omacetaxine, azacitidine, decitabine, cytarabine, and others).

Real-world efficacy of low dose osimertinib as second-line treatment in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Response rates of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to lower doses of osimertinib [20 mg once daily (OD) and 40 mg OD] are similar to those of the recommended dose of 80 mg OD, but there is a lack of real-world evidence on the effect of the lower doses of osimertinib on survival outcomes. We conducted this study to assess the efficacy and safety of lower osimertinib doses for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC whose disease had progressed on earlier generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a real-world clinical practice. This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with low doses of osimertinib after failing first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs due to acquired T790M mutation. Data on demographics, staging, treatment history, best overall response rate (ORR) based on RECIST 1.1, and adverse events (AEs) were collected from the patients' case notes. Descriptive data were described in percentages and medians. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 22 patients studied [males =8 and females =14; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 or 2 =7 and ECOG 3 or 4 =15], 45.5% were on 40 mg OD, 31.8% were on 80 mg every other day (EOD), and 22.7% on 40 mg EOD. First-line EGFR TKIs used included afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib. The ORR with lower doses of second-line osimertinib was 77.3%. Overall, the median PFS was 10.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-11.4] and median OS was 13.0 months (95% CI: 9.4-16.6). In patients with ECOG 1 or 2, the median PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI: 5.8-30.2) and the median OS was not reached at the time of analysis. In patients with poor ECOG performance status of 3 and 4, good survival outcomes were also seen with a median PFS of 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.7-9.3) and median OS of 10.0 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.5). All AEs except one case of paronychia were Grade 1. There were no Grade 3 or 4 AEs. Treatment with low dose osimertinib demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients who failed first-line treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs due to T790M mutation.

A predictive model for therapy failure in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

AbstractAlthough tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has markedly improved the survival of people with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 20% to 30% of people still experienced therapy failure. Data from 1955 consecutive patients with chronic-phase CML diagnosed by the European LeukemiaNet recommendations from 1 center receiving initial imatinib or a second-generation (2G) TKI therapy were interrogated to develop a clinical prediction model for TKI-therapy failure. This model was subsequently validated in 3454 patients from 76 other centers. Using the predictive clinical covariates associated with TKI-therapy failure, we developed a model that stratified patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk subgroups with significantly different cumulative incidences of therapy failure (P < .001). There was good discrimination and calibration in the external validation data set, and the performance was consistent with that of the training data set. Our model had the better prediction discrimination than the Sokal and European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival scores, with the greater time-dependent area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve values and a better ability to redefine the risk of therapy failure. Our model could help physicians estimate the likelihood of initial imatinib or 2G TKI–therapy failure in people with chronic-phase CML.

Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia today: efficacy and safety

Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia today: efficacy and safety

Imatinib Mesylate Causes Potential Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: the Results of a Case-control Study.

Unlike second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, effects of imatinib on the cardiovascular (CV) system are debatable. The current case-control study aimed to evaluate the CV effects of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using non-invasive 2D-echocardiography testing. Patients with CML ≥ 13 years attending the adult haematology clinic of a tertiary care hospital in north India were prospectively enrolled over 1.5 years. The study population (n = 110) consisted of 35 newly diagnosed patients (treatment-naïve group) and 75 patients under imatinib therapy ≥ 1 year (treated group). All the eligible patients were subjected to 2D-echocardiography to calculate pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and deceleration time (DT). These parameters were compared between the two groups. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The median age of study population was 40 years (range, 13-73) and M:F ratio was 1.14:1. Both the groups had similar demographics at the diagnosis including CV risk factors. The median PASP of the treated group was 2 mm Hg higher than the treatment-naïve group (25 vs 23 mm Hg, p-value = 0.919). The median LVEF of the treated group was 3.2% lower than the treatment-naïve group (58.5% vs 61.72%, p-value = 0.577). The median DT of the treated group was 7 ms shorter than treatment-naïve group (211 vs 204 ms, p-value = 0.411). Imatinib causes potential cardiac dysfunction in patients with CML. Large scale prospective follow-up trials in the same cohort of patients are needed to validate the findings of our study.

Patched Homolog Gene (PTCHI) as a Reliable Marker for Predicting Imatinib Response in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Correlation with Early Response to First Line of Treatment Imatinib

Abstract Background Chronic myeloid leukaemia BCR-ABL1 + (CML) is a clonal disorder of a pluripotent stem cell. The disease accounts for around 15% of leukaemias and may occur at any age. The diagnosis of CML is rarely difficult and is assisted by the characteristic presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. This results from the t (9;22) (q34; q11) translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, as a result of which part of the oncogene ABL1 is moved to the BCR gene on chromosome 22. and part of chromosome 22 moves to chromosome 9. The abnormal chromosome 22 is the Ph chromosome. Aim of the Work To measure the level of PTCH1 in newly diagnosed CP-CML and to find correlation between the level of PTCH1in those patients and response to first line of treatment; imatinib and other prognostic factors Patients and Methods In our study there are 50 patients newly diagnosed cml recruited from hematology out patients clinic in ain shams university within duration august 2021 –april 2022.We have measured level of PTCH1 protein in newly diagnosed CP-CML and its follow up after 6months Results the studies show that 25% of patients discontinue imatinib due to lack of efficacy. A few years ago, two second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), Dasatinib and Nilotinib, were approved for first-line treatment, increasing the options available for patients diagnosed with CP- CML.Currently, the best way to adjust treatment to fit the severity of the disease is by assessing the response at different milestones. One milestone is the BCR-ABL1/ABL1 transcript level at 3 months; a level &amp;gt;10% 3 months after starting treatment has been related to a worse subsequent imatinib response. However, whether a change in therapy is warranted based on this single determination is controversial. Conclusion Patched homolog 1 gene (PTCH1) is marker for predicting first line of treatment imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase in correlation with response to imatinib. It is detected by PCR and proved to be a reliable marker to detect early imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase. In our study, we measured level of (PTCH1) in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase using ELISA as a cost benefit in comparison to PCR in newly diagnosed cml patients on first line of treatment imatinib then follow up after 6 months. We found that it is a reliable marker, sensitive and specific to detect imatinib response.

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the preferred drugs for the treatment of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of different TKIs as first-line treatments for CML using network meta-analysis (NMA), providing a basis for the precise clinical use of TKIs. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Databases (VIP), SinoMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to include RCTs that compared the different TKIs as first line treatment for CML. The search timeline was from inception to 21 July 2023. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the frequentist NMA methods, the efficacy and safety of different TKIs were compared, including the rates of major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), all grade adverse events, grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events and liver toxicity. A total of 25 RCTs involving 6,823 patients with CML and 6 types of TKIs were included. In terms of efficacy, second-generation TKIs such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and radotinib showed certain advantages in improving patients' MMR and CCyR compared to imatinib. Additionally, imatinib 800 mg provided better MMRs and CCyRs than imatinib 400 mg. As far as safety was concerned, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all grade adverse events among the different TKIs. All TKIs can cause serious grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Dasatinib more likely caused anemia, bosutinib thrombocytopenia, and imatinib neutropenia, whereas nilotinib and flumatinib might have better safety profiles in terms of severe hematologic adverse events. For liver toxicity, radotinib 400 mg and imatinib 800 mg, respectively, had the highest likelihood of ranking first in incidence rates of all grade ALT and AST elevation. In CML, second-generation TKIs are more clinically effective than imatinib even if this last drug has a relatively better safety profile. Thus, as each second-generation TKI has a distinct clinical efficacy and safety, and is associated with different economic factors, its choice should be dictated by the specific patient clinical conditions (patient's specific disease characteristics, comorbid conditions, potential drug interactions, as well as their adherence). Nevertheless, due to the limited number of original research, additional high-quality studies are needed to achieve any firm conclusion on which second-generation TKI is the best choice for that peculiar patient.

Overcoming flumatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia: Insights into cellular mechanisms and ivermectin's therapeutic potential.

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a haematological malignancy characterized by the constitutive tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein. Flumatinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has exhibited superior clinical efficacy compared to its precursor, imatinib. However, with increased clinical use, resistance to flumatinib has emerged as a significant challenge. To investigate the mechanisms of flumatinib resistance in CML, we induced the human CML cell line K562 using a flumatinib concentration gradient method invitro, successfully establishing a flumatinib-resistant K562/FLM cell line. This cell line exhibited cross-resistance to imatinib and doxorubicin, but remained sensitive to the antiparasitic agent ivermectin, which possesses antitumoural effects. Through cellular experimentation, we explored the resistance mechanisms, which indicated that K562/FLM cells evade flumatinib cytotoxicity by enhancing autophagy, increasing the expression of membrane transport proteins, particularly P-glycoprotein, ABCC1 and ABCC4, as well as enhancing phosphorylation of p-EGFR, p-ERK and p-STAT3 proteins. Moreover, it was found that ivermectin effectively suppressed the expression of autophagy and transport proteins in K562/FLM cells, reduced the activity of the aforementioned phosphoproteins, and promoted apoptotic cell death. Collectively, the increased autophagy, higher expression of drug-efflux proteins and hyperactivation of the EGFR/ERK/STAT3 signalling pathway were identified as pivotal elements promoting resistance to flumatinib. The significant effects of ivermectin might offer a novel therapeutic strategy to overcome flumatinib resistance and optimize the treatment outcomes of CML.

Analysis of the resistance profile of real-world alectinib first-line therapy in patients with ALK rearrangement-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer using organoid technology in one case of lung cancer.

Alectinib has achieved excellent therapeutic efficacy in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, however, patients eventually develop resistance to it. Exploring the gene variant mapping after alectinib resistance provides a basis for the whole management of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to characterize the mutation profiles of real-world ALK rearrangement-positive advanced NSCLC patients after first-line alectinib treatment resistance. The research also investigated the treatment options and coping strategies after resistance. Clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line alectinib treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between November 2018 and April 2022 were collected. Moreover, next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of the patient's baseline and post-resistance tissues were gathered. One patient underwent lung cancer organoid culture and drug sensitivity testing. Out of 35 first-line alectinib-treated patients with advanced NSCLC, 31 are presently in progression-free survival (PFS; 4.3-35.0 months). Four patients experienced progressive disease, and all of them were sequentially treated with ceritinib. Tissue NGS results before sequential treatment in three patients indicated an echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-ALK fusion that remained at the original baseline, and the PFS for ceritinib treatment was 0.5-1.3 months. One patient developed acquired resistance mutations in the structural domain of ALK protein kinase (V1180L and E1161D), and the PFS for ceritinib treatment was 6.7 months. For one patient who maintained original baseline ALK rearrangement positive without acquired mutation after progression of ceritinib resistance, lung cancer-like organ culture with sequential brigatinib and lorlatinib led to a PFS of 3.2 and 1.9 months, respectively, which aligned with the corresponding drug susceptibility testing results for this patient. For ALK rearrangement-positive patients, blind sequencing of other second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or third-generation lorlatinib may not guarantee satisfactory tumor suppression following first-line second-generation ALK-TKI alectinib administration for treatment progression. NGS testing of patients' blood or tissue samples after disease progression may provide insight into the etiology of alectinib resistance. Patient-sourced drug sensitivity testing of lung cancer-like organs selects drug-sensitive medications based on NGS results and provides a reference for subsequent drug therapy for patients after drug resistance, particularly those who remain ALK rearrangement-positive at baseline.

Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia that is Intolerant or Resistant to Front-Line Treatment

With advances in treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the natural history of chronic phase (CP) CML has changed, with most individuals expected to live a normal life expectancy. The goal of therapy for most is to achieve a long-term deep molecular response (DMR) with the potential for medication discontinuation and treatment-free remission (TFR).1 Currently, six oral therapies have been approved for CP-CML in Canada: (1) imatinib, a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); (2) dasatinib, (3) nilotinib, and (4) bosutinib, the second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs); (5) ponantinib, a third-generation TKI; and (6) asciminib, specifically targeting the ABL Myristoyl pocket (STAMP) inhibitor. Classically, treatment for CP-CML has consisted of front-line imatinib and switching to a 2G-TKI upon treatment resistance or intolerance. Increasingly, patients are being prescribed an upfront 2G-TKI with the goal of achieving quicker and deeper molecular remissions and a TFR.2 Challenges arise in CML when treatment with either two TKIs (imatinib + 2G-TKI) or one 2G-TKI fails, given the lack of evidence to inform clinical decision-making at this juncture. This paper aims to define TKI failure and help guide the selection of second-line treatment after failure of front-line therapy.

Analysis of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in a Single Hematology Center in Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Summary: Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a pluripotent hemopoietic stem cell malignancy characterized by the presence of a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene derived from a balanced translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22) (q34; q11)] known as the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. CML is an acquired hematopoietic stem cell disease common to myelo- and lymphopoiesis, characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of granulopoiesis (Shuvaev et al. 2015; Yordanov and Varbanova 2019). Relevance and goals: Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib) have an advantage over imatinib (first-generation) in the frequency and speed of achieving cytogenetic and molecular responses in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), but they cause severe adverse effects and are much more expensive than imatinib, especially if we compare them to the prices of the registered generic products of Imatinib and Dasatinib. “Novartis Tasigna® trial shows superior results to Glivec® in patients with early-stage chronic myeloid leukemia”, reported on 10/20/2021 by Pierre Perrin-Montlouis. In the first direct comparison of these two oral therapies back in 2009 (Тasigna (nilotinib) 2009), as first-line treatment for CML, the results of Tasigna showed statistically significant improvement over Glivec in every measure of efficacy, including major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and prevention of progression to accelerated or blast phase, with responses achieved faster in the Tasigna group than in the Glivec group. Furthermore, in the last ten years, CML patients who have achieved a stable deep molecular response for at least 2 years have been included in clinical trials for the management of treatment-free remission (TFR) (Kim et al. 2013; Saußele et al. 2016). On the other hand, the ever-increasing costs of diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of the response of CML to the various therapeutic strategies require conducting pharmacoeconomic analyses of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility types in order to evaluate which are the cost-effective strategies with a view to introducing them into therapeutic practice. The present study aims to analyze the pharmacoeconomic efficiency of the TKI inhibitors used by the patients with CML-CP in the first and second lines, treated in the hematology clinic at UMHAT “St. George”, MU- Plovdiv during the period 2018–2022. Methods: An economic analysis of the medicinal use of TKIs for a 5-year period (2018–2022) was performed at the national level according to data from the National Health Insurance Fund and the availability, accessibility, and usability of original and generic TKIs in Bulgaria were evaluated. The direct medical costs for the therapy of all patients were calculated, including the costs of the TKI therapy, laboratory tests, and monitoring of the molecular response for the entire treatment period from the appointment of the TKI therapy until the end of 2022. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of the different therapeutic strategies with TKIs on the first and second lines of treatment of patients with CML-CP in the hematology clinic at UMHAT “St. George” Medical University, Plovdiv, using the decision analysis method and conducting one-way and probalistic sensitivity analyses. Results: The sensitivity analyzes of all pharmacoeconomic models showed the robustness and reliability of the obtained results. The threshold limits of medical costs and the frequency of achieving a deep molecular response determining the choice of first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first- and second-line therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase have been determined. Prescribing doctors prefer the original MPs to generic analogues, which is also assumed by the current regulations, according to which even for expensive MPs dispensing by protocols, the prescription is by trade and not by international non-proprietary names (INN), which is why the use of the much cheaper generic MPs is negligibly low compared to original MPs. A personalized approach to the patient’s therapy and monitoring the patient’s molecular response to it, as well as stopping therapy in 25–30% of patients suitable to stop it safely when in TFR phase with a probability of more than 50% of not having a relapse will save additional costs that, by improving the cost-effectiveness of therapy for patients with CML, will be directed towards the treatment of new patients with this or other diseases. Conclusion: These pharmacoeconomic models can be applied to improve diagnostic and therapeutic standards in clinical practice and for the efficient use of the very limited resources for health care in countries like Bulgaria. The conducted cost-effectiveness analyses confirmed that the hematologists at the University Center in Plovdiv adhere to the recommendations of Leukemia Net and the Bulgarian Medical Society of Hematology and achieve not only good therapeutic but also pharmacoeconomic efficiency in the treatment of CML-СР patients in first- and second- line therapy.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict poor efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Imatinib is the most widely used tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia(CML-CP). However, failure to achieve optimal response after imatinib administration, and subsequent switch to second-generation TKI therapy results in poor efficacy and induces drug resistance. In the present study, we developed and validated a nomogram to predict the efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of patients newly diagnosed with CML-CP in order to help clinicians truly select patients who need 2nd generation TKI during initial therapy and to supplement the risk score system. We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients newly diagnosed with CML-CP who met the inclusion criteria and were treated with imatinib at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University from January 2012 to June 2022. The patients were divided into a poor-response cohort (N = 60)and an optimal-response cohort (N = 43) based on whether they achieved major molecular remission (MMR) after 12 months of imatinib treatment. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we developed a chronic myeloid leukemia imatinib-poor treatment (CML-IMP) prognostic model using a nomogram considering characteristics like age, sex, HBG, splenic size, and ALP. The CML-IMP model was internally validated and compared with Sokal, Euro, EUTOS, and ELTS scores. The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC)of 0.851 (95% CI 0.778-0.925) indicated satisfactory discriminatory ability of the nomogram. The calibration plot shows good consistency between the predicted and actual observations. The net reclassification index (NRI), continuous NRI value, and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) showed that the nomogram exhibited superior predictive performance compared to the Sokal, EUTOS, Euro, and ELTS scores (P < 0.05). In addition, the clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomogram was useful for clinical decision-making. In predicting treatment response, only Sokal and CML-IMP risk stratification can effectively predict the cumulative acquisition rates of CCyR, MMR, and DMR (P<0.05). We constructed a nomogram that can be effectively used to predict the efficacy of imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP based on a single center, 10-year retrospective cohort study.

Early dose reduction of dasatinib does not compromise clinical outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: A comparative analysis of two prospective trials

Dasatinib is a potent second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used as a first-line treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Currently, dose modification due to adverse events (AEs) is common in patients treated with dasatinib. This study compared the outcomes of two sequential prospective trials that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase of CML (CP-CML) and initiated dasatinib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. In the PCR-DEPTH study, CP-CML patients who started dasatinib 100 mg daily were enrolled and followed up, while in the DAS-CHANGE study, when patients achieved early molecular response with any grade of AEs were enrolled and treated with dasatinib 80 mg once daily. A total of 102 patients (PCR-DEPTH) and 90 patients (DAS-CHANGE) were compared. Although the median value of the relative dose intensity (RDI) of dasatinib was significantly higher in PCR-DEPTH than in DAS-CHANGE (99.6 % vs. 80.1 %, p <0.001), the MMR rate at 12months showed a trend toward superiority in DAS-CHANGE compared to PCR-DEPTH (77.1 % vs 65.2 %, p = 0.084). The frequencies of MR4.0 at 24 and 36 months were higher in DAS-CHANGE than in PCR-DEPTH (44.4 % vs 28.8 %, p = 0.052 and 63.6 % vs 40.3 %, p= 0.013, respectively). RDIs were not different according to the MMR, MR4.0 or MR4.5 in analyses using a pooled population. Our results suggest that early dose reduction of dasatinib does not compromise efficacy in patients achieving EMR at 3 months and could be an interventional strategy for improving long term outcomes.

CML in the very elderly: the impact of comorbidities and TKI selection in a real-life multicenter study

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have greatly improved chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatments, with survival rates close to the general population. Yet, for the very elderly, robust data remains limited. This study focused on assessing comorbidities, treatment approaches, responses, and survival for elderly CML patients. Our study was conducted on 123 elderly (≥ 75 years) CML patients across four centers in Israel and Moffitt Cancer Center, USA. The median age at diagnosis was 79.1 years, with 44.7% being octogenarians. Comorbidities were very common; cardiovascular risk factors (60%), cardiovascular diseases (42%), with a median age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aaCCI) of 5. Imatinib was the leading first-line therapy (69%), while the use of second-generation TKIs increased post-2010. Most patients achieved a major molecular response (MMR, 66.7%), and half achieved a deep molecular response (DMR, 50.4%). Over half (52.8%) of patients moved to second-line, and nearly a quarter (23.5%) to third-line treatments, primarily due to intolerance. Overall survival (OS) was notably longer in patients with an aaCCI score below 5, and in patients who attained DMR. Contrary to expectations, the Israeli cohort showed a shorter actual life expectancy than projected, suggesting a larger impact of CML on elderly survival. In summary, imatinib remains the main initial treatment, but second-generation TKIs are on the rise among elderly CML patients. Outcomes in elderly CML patients depend on comorbidities, TKI type, response, and age, underscoring the need for personalized therapy and additional research on TKI effectiveness and safety.