Second-generation Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Research Articles

The cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients in China.

Iruplinalkib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is independently developed by a Chinese pharmaceutical company. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of iruplinalkib versus alectinib in the Chinese healthcare setting. A partitioned survival model was developed to project the economic and health outcomes. Efficacy was derived using unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Cost and utility values were obtained from the literature and experts' opinions. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were carried out to evaluate the model's robustness. Treatment with iruplinalkib versus alectinib resulted in a gain of 0.843 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with incremental costs of $20,493.27, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $24,313.95/QALY. Parameters related to relative efficacy and drug costs were the main drivers of the model outcomes. From the PSA, iruplinalkib had a 90% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,863.56/QALY. Compared to alectinib, iruplinalkib is a cost-effective therapy for patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC.

Abstract 4538: Brigatinib induces synergy with PARP inhibitors through dual inhibition of FAK and EphA2 in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

Abstract PARP inhibitors (PARPis) have now become a standard of care for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), especially for those with defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. However, the innate and acquired PARPi resistance in HGSOC poses a significant concern, necessitating the exploration of novel treatment options and strategies. Here we investigated the potential of combining brigatinib—a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for treating lung cancer—with PARPis as way to enhance PARPi activity in HGSOC. Clonogenic cell survival assays revealed that brigatinib synergizes with PARPis in HR-proficient and -deficient HGSOC cell lines. In subsequent proteomics approaches and cell-based confirmatory studies, we found that brigatnib suppressed tyrosine kinases FAK and EphA2 with reduction in downstream signaling. Follow-up pharmacologic and gene-silencing techniques demonstrated that dual FAK and EphA2 inhibition additively reduces PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK cell survival signaling to levels conferring PARPi sensitivity. Additionally, the efficacy of this therapeutic approach on tumor size reduction was assessed in HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, with combination treatment inducing tumor regression more effectively than either agent alone. Overall, our studies unveil a beneficial ALK-independent effect of brigatinib that may offer new avenues for considering its repurposing as a HGSOC therapy. Citation Format: Julie R. Duffield, Xiaonan Hou, Iman K. McKeon-Makki, Amelia M. Huehls, Benjamin W. Wilson, Anjali Prasad, Xinyan Wu, Scott H. Kaufmann, Larry M. Karnitz, John J. Weroha, Arun Kanakkanthara. Brigatinib induces synergy with PARP inhibitors through dual inhibition of FAK and EphA2 in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4538.

Identification of Crucial Genes and Signaling Pathways in Alectinib-Resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Bioinformatic Analysis.

Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has been shown to be effective for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, alectinib resistance is a serious problem worldwide. To the best of our knowledge, little information is available on its molecular mechanisms using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. In this study, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected from the gene expression profile GSE73167 between parental and alectinib-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cell samples. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway and Gene Ontology (GO) annotation enrichment analyses were conducted using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). The construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was performed to visualize DEGs. The hub genes were extracted based on the analysis of the PPI network using plug-in cytoHubba of Cytoscape software. The functional roles of the key genes were investigated using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer (UALCAN), Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) analysis. The networks of kinase, miRNA, and transcription-factor targets of SFTPD were explored using LinkedOmics. The drug sensitivity analysis of SFTPD was analyzed using the RNAactDrug database. Results showed a total of 144 DEGs were identified. Five hub genes were extracted, including mucin 5B (MUC5B), surfactant protein D (SFTPD), deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 (DMBT1), surfactant protein A2 (SFTPA2), and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3). The survival analysis using GEPIA displayed that low expression of SFTPD had a significantly negative effect on the prognosis of patients with LUAD. GSEA revealed that low expression of SFTPD was positively correlated with the pathways associated with drug resistance, such as DNA replication, cell cycle, drug metabolism, and DNA damage repair, including mismatch repair (MMR), base excision repair (BER), homologous recombination (HR), and nucleotide excision repair (NER). The SFTPD expression was negatively correlated with the drug sensitivity of alectinib according to RNAactDrug database. The expression of SFTPD was further validated in parental H3122 cells and alectinib-resistant H3122 cells by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). In conclusion, our study found that the five hub genes, especially low expression of SFTPD, are closely related to alectinib resistance in patients with LUAD.

Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions with Ensartinib as a Time-Dependent CYP3A Inhibitor Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Ensartinib (X-396) is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of ALK-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Although in vitro experiments and molecular docking suggested its potential as a cytochrome P450 inhibitor, no further investigation or clinical trials have been conducted to assess its drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk. In this study, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments to elucidate the inhibition mechanism of ensartinib. Furthermore, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed based on in vitro, in silico, and in vivo parameters, verified using clinical data, and applied to predict the clinical DDI mediated by ensartinib. The in vitro incubation experiments suggested that ensartinib exhibited strong time-dependent inhibition. Simulation results from the PBPK model indicated a significant increase in the exposure of CYP3A substrates in the presence of ensartinib, with the maximal plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve increasing up to 12-fold and 29-fold for sensitive substrates. Based on these findings, it is evident that co-administration of ensartinib and CYP3A substrates requires careful regulatory consideration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ensartinib was found to be a strong time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A for the first time based on in vitro experiments, but there was no research conducted to estimate the risk of drug-drug interaction (DDI) of ensartinib in clinic. Therefore, the first ensartinib physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed and applied to predict various untested scenarios. The simulation result indicated that the exposure of CYP3A substrate increased significantly and urged the further clinical DDI study.

Sequential therapy with crizotinib and a second-generation ALK inhibitor versus direct therapy of a second-generation ALK inhibitor in ALK-positive advanced lung cancer: a real-world study.

There are few real-world studies in which the efficacy of sequential crizotinib and second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are compared with direct therapy of second-generation ALK TKI in ALK-positive advanced lung cancer. Between May 2014 and October 2022, 211 patients from the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital who harbored ALK rearrangement were analyzed. Of these patients, 115 received crizotinib with sequential second-generation ALK TKIs, and 96 patients received a second-generation ALK TKI directly. The survival analysis of median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system time to progression (CNS TTP) in the various groups were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Of the 211 lung cancer patients with ALK rearrangement, there were no statistical differences in PFS (25.27 vs. 20.47 months, P=0.644) and OS (70.27 months vs. not reached, P=0.991) between the 115 patients in the sequential therapy group and the 96 patients in the direct second-generation group. In the patients with baseline brain metastases at study entry (n=54), the sequential therapy group had a significantly shorter median CNS TTP than the direct second-generation group (10.40 vs. 22.40 months, P=0.040). Multivariate analyses revealed that the prognostic factors for PFS included performance status (PS, P=0.047) and brain metastases (P=0.010). For OS, the prognostic factors included PS (P=0.047) and liver metastases (P=0.021). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between first-generation sequential second-generation ALK TKIs and direct therapy of second-generation ALK TKI regimens. The CNS efficacy of the direct second-generation group was better than that of the sequential therapy group. The prognostic factors for PFS included PS and brain metastases, while the prognostic factors for OS, PS and liver metastases were included.

Conteltinib (CT-707) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study

BackgroundConteltinib (CT-707) is a potent second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) showing promising anti-tumor activities in preclinical studies. This study aimed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy of conteltinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsIn this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study, conteltinib was taken orally at doses of 50 to 800 mg quaque die (QD) in a dose-escalation phase. If the response was observed in a dose cohort of the dose-escalation phase, dose expansion was started. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and adverse events assessed by investigators.ResultsBetween April 13, 2016, and February 8, 2020, 64 ALK-positive NSCLC patients were enrolled, including 41 (64.1%) patients with ALK TKI-naïve and 23 (35.9%) patients who received crizotinib previously. In the dose-escalation phase, 26 patients were treated with conteltinib at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 450 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg QD. One DLT event was reported at the dose of 600 mg. MTD was not reached. Overall, 58 (90.6%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 9 (14.1%) patients had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (46 [71.9%]), serum creatinine elevated (29 [45.3%]), aspartate aminotransferase elevated (25 [39.1%]), and nausea (24 [37.5%]). Among 39 ALK TKI-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 64.1% (25 of 39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47.2–78.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 9.26–23.3), and median duration of response (DoR) was 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.06–25.8). Among 21 patients who received crizotinib previously, the ORR was 33.3% (7 of 21; 95% CI, 14.6–57.0), median PFS was 6.73 months (95% CI, 4.73–8.54), and median DoR was 6.60 months (95% CI, 3.77–13.3).ConclusionsIn this study, conteltinib showed manageable safety profile, favorable PK properties, and anti-tumor activity in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 600 mg QD for ALK TKI-naïve patients and 300 mg bis in die (BID) for patients who received crizotinib previously.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02695550.

Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to analyze the pooled effects and adverse events of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of brigatinib were 64% (95% CI 45%-83%) and 88% (95% CI 80%-96%), respectively. The pooled mPFS was 10.52 months (95% CI 7.66-13.37). In the subgroup analyses by treatment line, the highest mPFS was reached in first-line treatment (24.00 months, 95% CI 18.40-43.20), followed by post-crizotinib second-line treatment (mPFS=16.26 months, 95% CI 12.87-19.65), and second-line with any prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mPFS=12.96 months, 95% CI 11.14-14.78). Among patients with any baseline brain metastases, the pooled intracranial ORR (iORR) was estimated as 54% (95% CI 35%-73%) for any treatment line, and 60% (95% CI 39%-81%) for first-line treatment. Intracranial PFS (iPFS) reached 19.26 months (95% CI 14.82-23.70) in patients with any baseline brain metastases. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased (44%, 95% CI 26%-63%), diarrhea (37%, 95% CI 27%-48%), and nausea (28%, 95% CI 17%-39%) of any grade were the most common adverse events. Brigatinibis effective in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, particularly showingrobust intracranial PFS. Brigatinib used as first-line treatment yielded superior PFS compared with brigatinib used as other treatment lines. These results suggested a benefit of using brigatinib earlier in the patient's management. All adverse events are manageable, with CPK increased and gastrointestinal reactions found to be the most common types. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0142/, identifier (INPLASY202230141).

1011P MET and NF2 alterations confer early resistance to first-line alectinib treatment in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

The second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), alectinib, has shown impressive efficacy in naïve ALK-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, why tumors develop early resistance to the drug is incompletely understood.

Overall survival indirect treatment comparison between brigatinib and alectinib for the treatment of front-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive non–small cell lung cancer using data from ALEX and final results from ALTA-1L

Background Second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) alectinib and brigatinib have shown efficacy as front-line treatments for ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No head-to-head data are currently available for brigatinib vs alectinib in the ALK-TKI–naive population. Objective To estimate the relative overall survival (OS) for brigatinib vs alectinib with indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) using ALEX and ALTA-1L clinical trial data. Methods The latest aggregate data from the ALEX trial and final patient-level data from ALTA-1L were used. ITCs were conducted with/without treatment crossover adjustments to estimate relative OS. Bucher methods, anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) and unanchored MAICs were employed in ITCs without treatment crossover adjustments. An inverse probability of censoring weight Cox model, a marginal structure model and rank-preserving structural failure time models (with/without re-censoring) within an anchored MAIC were used in ITCs with treatment crossover adjustments. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results HRs for brigatinib vs alectinib for relative OS generated from ITCs without treatment crossover adjustments ranged from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.59–1.38) in the unanchored MAIC to 1.20 (95% CI: 0.69–2.11) using the Bucher method. Methods employing treatment switching adjustments estimated HRs for relative OS ranging from 0.74 (95% CI: 0.38–1.45) to 1.11 (95% CI: 0.63–1.94). Results from all ITCs did not indicate statistically different survival profiles. Conclusion Regardless of ITC methodology, OS is comparable for brigatinib vs alectinib in patients with ALK+ NSCLC previously untreated with an ALK inhibitor.

Real-world Use of Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases in Patients With ALK-positive Lung Cancer Receiving First-line ALK Inhibitor

Management paradigms now allow for systemic targeted drugs before central nervous system (CNS)-directed radiation therapy (RT) in selected asymptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). We aimed to quantify how novel targeted agents with improved CNS activity, such as second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors (eg, alectinib), might affect the role of CNS-directed RT. This retrospective, observational, real-world, patterns-of-care study used a nationwide, electronic, health record-derived, de-identified, longitudinal database. A random sample of patients with ALK+ advanced NSCLC and BM on first-line ALK-inhibitor monotherapy between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2019 were included. Using an index date of the first instance of BM, the outcome was brain-directed local treatment within 4 months. Trends over time were reported and tested using multivariable modified Poisson regression with robust error variance, including an indicator during or after 2017 (when alectinib was approved). Of the 352 included patients, 146 had BM. In addition, 104 patients received CNS-directed local therapy, and 42 did not. The majority of patients (89.4%) were treated with RT alone. Of those receiving RT, stereotactic radiosurgery monotherapy was the most common (53%), followed by whole brain RT alone (39%). On multivariable analysis, patients who had their first BM during or after 2017 had a decreased rate of receiving local BM treatment versus those before 2017 with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.95; P = .026). We found no change in the proportion of BM treated with whole brain RT during or after 2017 versus before (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.24-2.06; P = .517). We found decreasing use of CNS-directed RT in patients with NSCLC with new BM on first-line ALK inhibitors. Clinical outcomes for these patients require continued investigation, because physicians may become increasingly comfortable deferring upfront local therapy for BM in lieu of novel targeted agents with improved CNS activity.

Safety and activity of alectinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study

BackgroundAlectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is highly effective in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and represents a standard first-line therapy. New strategies are needed, however, to delay resistance. We conducted a phase I/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of combining alectinib with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled. The phase I portion employed a dose de-escalation strategy with alectinib and bevacizumab starting at the individual standard doses. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In phase II, the primary objective was to evaluate the safety of the combination at the RP2D; the secondary objective was to determine extracranial and intracranial efficacy.ResultsEleven patients were enrolled between September 2015 and February 2020. Most patients (82%) had baseline brain metastases. Six patients (55%) were treatment-naive; five (46%) had received prior ALK TKIs (crizotinib, n = 3; ceritinib, n = 1; crizotinib then brigatinib, n = 1). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. RP2D was determined as alectinib 600 mg orally twice daily plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Three patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events: pneumonitis related to alectinib, proteinuria related to bevacizumab, and hypertension related to bevacizumab. Treatment-related intracranial hemorrhage was not observed. Six (100%) of six treatment-naive patients and three (60%) of five ALK TKI-pretreated patients had objective responses; median progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval, 9.0 months-not reached) and 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3 months-not reached), respectively. Intracranial responses occurred in four (100%) of four treatment-naive and three (60%) of five TKI-pretreated patients with baseline brain metastases. The study was stopped prematurely because of slow accrual.ConclusionsAlectinib plus bevacizumab was well tolerated without unanticipated toxicities or dose-limiting toxicities.

BRAF V600E mutation and MET amplification as resistance pathways of the second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor alectinib in lung cancer

BackgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) targeted therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinomas. However, patients inevitably develop resistance to such therapies. To investigate novel mechanisms of resistance to second generation ALK inhibitors, we characterized and modeled ALK inhibitor resistance of ALK-positive patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models established from advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients who have progressed on one or more ALK inhibitors. MethodsWhole exome sequencing was performed to identify resistance mechanisms to ALK inhibitors in PDXs generated from biopsies at the time of relapse. ALK fusion status was confirmed using fluorescent in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, RNA-sequencing, RT-qPCR and western blot. Targeted therapies to overcome acquired resistance were then tested on the PDX models. ResultsThree PDX models were successfully established from biopsies of two patients who had progressed on crizotinib and/or alectinib. The PDX models recapitulated the histology and ALK status of their patient tumors, as well as their matched patients’ clinical treatment outcome to ALK inhibitors. Whole exome sequencing identified MET amplification and previously unreported BRAF V600E mutation as independent mechanisms of resistance to alectinib. Importantly, PDX treatment of inhibitors specific for these targets combined with ALK inhibitor overcame resistance. ConclusionsBypass signaling pathway through c-MET and BRAF are independent mechanisms of resistance to alectinib. Individualized intervention against these resistance pathways could be viable therapeutic options in alectinib-refractory lung adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

What is known and objectiveCeritinib is a new, oral, potent and selective second‐generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States in April 2014. It is active in crizotinib‐resistant patients, especially in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects and side effects of ceritinib in ALK‐rearranged NSCLC.MethodsWe searched articles published from January 1980 to March 2019 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The pooled estimate and 95% CI were calculated with DerSimonian‐Laird method and the random effect model.Results and discussionFrom 15 articles, 2,598 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Eleven studies reported the ORR, and the DCR was presented in 10 studies. The ORR and DCR of ceritinib were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39‐0.57) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69‐0.82), respectively. The PFS and OS were presented in nine and three eligible studies, respectively. The PFS and OS of ceritinib were 7.26 months (95% CI, 5.10‐9.43) and 18.73 months (95% CI; 14.59‐22.87). These results suggested that ceritinib can effectively treat patients with ALK‐rearranged NSCLC. Diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting were the three most common AEs and occurred in 69% (95% CI 51.7‐87.1%), 66% (95% CI 47.0‐85.8%) and 51% (95% CI 35.9‐66.8%) of patients, respectively. Considering serious gastrointestinal AEs, antiemetic and antidiarrhoeal drugs should be considered to improve a patient's tolerance to ceritinib.What is new and conclusionCeritinib is effective in the treatment of patients with ALK‐rearranged NSCLC with crizotinib resistance. The DCR was up to 76%, and PFS was extended to 7.6 months. The AEs were acceptable.

Revealing Acquired Resistance Mechanisms of Kinase-Targeted Drugs Using an on-the-Fly, Function-Site Interaction Fingerprint Approach.

Although kinase-targeted drugs have achieved significant clinical success, they are frequently subject to the limitations of drug resistance, which has become a primary vulnerability to targeted drug therapy. Therefore, deciphering resistance mechanisms is an important step in designing more efficacious, antiresistant drugs. Here we studied two FDA-approved kinase drugs: Crizotinib and Ceritinib, which are first- and second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) targeted inhibitors, to unravel drug-resistance mechanisms. We used an on-the-fly, function-site interaction fingerprint (on-the-fly Fs-IFP) approach, combining binding free-energy surface calculations with the Fs-IFPs. Establishing the potentials of mean force and monitoring the atomic-scale protein-ligand interactions, before and after L1196M-induced drug resistance, revealed insights into drug-resistance/antiresistant mechanisms. Crizotinib prefers to bind the wild-type ALK kinase domain, whereas Ceritinib binds more favorably to the mutated ALK kinase domain, in agreement with experimental results. We determined that ALK kinase-drug interactions in the region of the front pocket are associated with drug resistance. Additionally, we find that the L1196M mutation does not simply alter the binding modes of inhibitors but also affects the flexibility of the entire ALK kinase domain. Our work provides an understanding of the mechanisms of ALK drug resistance, confirms the usefulness of the on-the-fly Fs-IFP approach, and provides a practical paradigm to study drug-resistance mechanisms in prospective drug discovery.

<p>Alectinib Induced Regression of Renal and Hepatic Cysts Caused by Crizotinib</p>

BackgroundCrizotinib is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An increased incidence of renal cysts has been described during the crizotinib treatment.Case PresentationWe herein report the case of a 74-year-old woman who received crizotinib for metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. During the crizotinib treatment, complex renal cystic lesions with invasion of perirenal spaces and iliopsoas muscle appeared; two complex hepatic cysts were also observed. Almost all lesions disappeared after switching to alectinib, a second-generation ALK inhibitor.ConclusionIt would seem that alectinib is able to reduce in size and number hepatic and renal cysts caused by the crizotinib treatment. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to clarify the role of both crizotinib in the onset of renal and hepatic cysts and alectinib in their disappearance.

Insight into the binding behavior of ceritinib on human α-1 acid glycoprotein: Multi-spectroscopic and molecular modeling approaches.

Ceritinib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor for mainly treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This investigation focused on to clarify in detail the binding behavior between human α-1 acid glycoprotein (HAG) and ceritinib by means of multi-spectroscopic and molecular modeling approaches. Fluorescence data obtained at four different temperatures indicated ceritinib quenched the endogenous fluorescence of HAG by a static quenching mechanism. Based on the Kb value at 105M-1 level, it can be inferred that the binding affinity between both is strong. From findings of thermodynamic parameter analysis, the competitive experiments with ANS and sucrose as well as molecular dynamic (MD) simulation, it can be inferred that hydrophobicity, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces as well as electrostatic interactions exist in the binding interaction between ceritinib and HAG. The findings from UV absorption, circular dichroism, and synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy indicated that the change in the microenvironment around the protein structure, secondary structure and tryptophan residues occurred after interaction with ceritinib. The data from FRET analysis confirmed that the non-radiative energy transfer between the two existed and the binding distance between the acceptor (ceritinib) and donor (HAG) was 2.11nm. Meantime, the influence of Ca2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Zn2+ ions on the binding interaction of ceritinib with HAG were obvious, especially Zn2+ ion.

Metformin reduces HGF-induced resistance to alectinib via the inhibition of Gab1

Alectinib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that has sufficient clinical efficacy and satisfactory safety in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with or without brain metastasis. Alectinib has now become an important drug in the first-line treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC; however, resistance is almost inevitable. The increased expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its physiological receptor tyrosine kinase MET have been shown to be linked to acquired resistance to various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and this phenomenon has been observed in some ALK-positive NSCLC tumour tissues. In this study, we found that HGF levels in the culture supernatant of an ALK-positive cell line tended to increase with time and could be further increased by alectinib in a time-dependent manner. Exogenous or endogenous HGF did not cause resistance to the ALK/MET double-targeted small molecule inhibitor crizotinib, but it was an important cause of alectinib resistance. Furthermore, Gab1 was a key effector in the HGF/MET signal transduction pathway that mediated alectinib resistance. The antidiabetic drug metformin combined with alectinib overcame alectinib resistance triggered by HGF/MET through disrupting the complex between MET and Gab1, thereby inhibiting Gab1 phosphorylation and the activation of downstream signal transduction pathways. These results suggest that metformin combined with alectinib may be useful for overcoming alectinib resistance induced by the activation of the HGF/MET signalling pathway and improving the efficacy of alectinib.

YAP1 mediates survival of ALK-rearranged lung cancer cells treated with alectinib via pro-apoptotic protein regulation

Despite the promising clinical efficacy of the second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor alectinib in patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer, some tumor cells survive and eventually relapse, which may be an obstacle to achieving a cure. Limited information is currently available on the mechanisms underlying the initial survival of tumor cells against alectinib. Using patient-derived cell line models, we herein demonstrate that cancer cells survive a treatment with alectinib by activating Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), which mediates the expression of the anti-apoptosis factors Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL, and combinatorial inhibition against both YAP1 and ALK provides a longer tumor remission in ALK-rearranged xenografts when compared with alectinib monotherapy. These results suggest that the inhibition of YAP1 is a candidate for combinatorial therapy with ALK inhibitors to achieve complete remission in patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer.

Safety and Tolerability of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

The chimeric protein echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase, resulting from the rearrangement of the homonym genes, is one of the currently targetable oncogenic drivers in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. In fact, four first- and second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors, crizotinib (PF-02341066), ceritinib (LDK378), alectinib (CH5424802), and brigatinib (AP26113), are presently approved for clinical practice; however, these agents are not devoid of complications and thus should be administered meaningfully. Furthermore, third-generation inhibitors are currently under development to overcome acquired resistance mechanisms inevitably resulting from treatment with first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Therefore, this article aims to provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art review about the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability profiles of currently available and promising under-development anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Alectinib Resistance in ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancer by Dual Salvage Signaling in a Clinically Paired Resistance Model.

The mechanisms responsible for the development of resistance to alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, are still unclear, and few cell lines are currently available for investigating ALK-rearranged lung cancer. To identify the mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to alectinib, two patient-derived cell lines were established from an alectinib-naïve ALK-rearranged lung cancer and then after development of alectinib resistance. The properties acquired during treatments were detected by comparisons of the two cell lines, and then functional analyses were performed. Coactivation of c-Src and MET was identified after the development of alectinib resistance. Combinatorial therapy against Src and MET significantly restored alectinib sensitivity in vitro (17.2-fold). Increased apoptosis, reduction of tumor volume, and inhibition of MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling molecules for proliferation and survival were observed when the three kinases (Src, MET, and ALK) were inhibited. A patient-derived xenograft from the alectinib-resistant cells indicated that combination therapy with a saracatinib and crizotinib significantly decreased tumor size in vivo. To confirm the generality, a conventional alectinib-resistant cell line model (H2228-AR1S) was established from NCI-H2228 cells (EML4-ALK variant 3a/b). In H2228-AR1S, combination inhibition of Src and MET also restored alectinib sensitivity. These data reveal that dual salvage signaling from MET and Src is a potential therapeutic target in alectinib-resistant patients. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility to elucidate personalized drug-resistance mechanisms from individual patient samples.