Seclusion Room Research Articles

A Nursing Process for Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Severe Mental Illness Receiving Treatment Involving Long-Term Coercive Measures: A Modified Grounded Theory Approach.

The use of shared decision-making (SDM) has recently attracted attention for building recovery-oriented therapeutic relationships with patients with severe mental illness (SMI). The purpose of this study was to describe a nursing process for SDM for psychiatric patients with SMI being treated via long-term coercive measures, such as seclusion and physical restraint, in the "seclusion room" of a psychiatric ward. The study used a modified grounded theory approach. The participants were 17 psychiatric nurses. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews. Concepts and categories were generated from verbatim transcripts, and their relationships were illustrated using a diagram and by generating a storyline. The nursing process for SDM was based on sensing the response to triggering stimuli, and the nurse-led preventive measures compensated for the patients' lack of coping skills. Because of the patients' persistent instability in response to certain stimuli, in our process, nurses are involved in creating opportunities for self-understanding and self-selection while also taking proactive preventative measures. Patients' reactions to surrounding stimuli were evaluated by nurses, who then determined whether they (or the patient) should take the lead in terms of decision-making.

Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia.

Aggressive or violent behaviour is often associated with people with schizophrenia in common perceptions of the disease. Risk assessment methods have been used to identify and evaluate the behaviour of those individuals who are at the greatest risk of perpetrating aggression or violence or characterise the likelihood to commit acts. Although many different interventions have been developed to decrease aggressive or violent incidences in inpatient care, staff working in inpatient settings seek easy-to-use methods to decrease patient aggressive events. However, many of these are time-consuming, and they require intensive training for staff and patient monitoring. It has also been recognised in clinical practice that if staff monitor patients' behaviour in a structured manner, the monitoring itself may result in a reduction of aggressive/violent behaviour and incidents in psychiatric settings. To assess the effects of structured aggression or violence risk assessment methods for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, on 10 February 2021. We also inspected references of all identified studies. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing structured risk assessment methods added to standard professional care with standard professional care for the evaluation of aggressive or violent behaviour among people with schizophrenia. At least two review authors independently inspected citations, selected studies, extracted data, and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes, we calculated a standard estimation of the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) and its 95% CI. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies and created a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. We included four studies in the review. The total number of participants was not identifiable, as some studies provided number of participants included, and some only patient days. The studies compared a package of structured assessment methods with a control group that included routine nursing care and drug therapy or unstructured psychiatric observations/treatment based on clinical judgement. In two studies, information about treatment in control care was not available. One study reported results for our primary outcome, clinically important change in aggressive/violent behaviour, measured by the rate of severe aggression events. There was likely a positive effect favouring structured risk assessment over standard professional care (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.85; 1 RCT; 1852 participants; corrected for cluster design: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93; moderate-certainty evidence). One trial reported data for the use of coercive measures (seclusion room). Compared to standard professional care, structured risk assessment may have little or no effect on use of seclusion room as days (corrected for cluster design: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.07; N = 20; low-certainty evidence) or use of seclusion room as secluded participants (RR 1.83, 95% CI 0.39 to 8.7; 1 RCT; N = 20; low-certainty evidence). However, seclusion room may be used less frequently in the standard professional care group compared to the structured risk assessment group (incidence) (corrected for cluster design: RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.49 to 5.47; 1 RCT; N = 20; substantial heterogeneity, Chi2 = 0.0; df = 0.0; P = 0.0; I2 = 100%; low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a clear effect on adverse events of escape (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.11; 1 RCT; n = 200; very low-certainty evidence); fall down (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.15; 1 RCT; n = 200; very low-certainty evidence); or choking (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.11; 1 RCT; n = 200; very low-certainty evidence) when comparing structured risk assessment to standard professional care. There were no useable data for patient-related outcomes such as global state, acceptance of treatment, satisfaction with treatment, quality of life, service use, or costs. Based on the available evidence, it is not possible to conclude that structured aggression or violence risk assessment methods are effective for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. Future work should combine the use of interventions and structured risk assessment methods to prevent aggressive incidents in psychiatric inpatient settings.

Vulnerability to risky sexual behavior among patients with severe mental illness in Uganda

BackgroundThe relationship between severe mental illness and risky sexual behaviors, defined as acts associated with a higher risk level is notably significant in sub-Saharan Africa. In Uganda, mental disorders have been substantially correlated with unsafe sexual practices, contributing to the global burden of risky sexual behaviors. The consequential outcomes, such as sexually transmitted diseases, has resulted into a significant challenge in managing severe mental illness and potentially increased risky sexual behaviour. There is an urgent need to identify and understand factors specific to Uganda that amplify the vulnerability of severe mental illness patients to risky sexual behaviors. This study aimed to understand the vulnerability factors to risky sexual behaviour in severe mental illness in central and south-western Uganda, seeking to inform the development of tailored and effective intervention strategies to address this critical issue.MethodsThis was a qualitative descriptive study that was carried out at Butabika and Masaka hospitals in Uganda, involving a varied group of 32 individuals, comprising 12 persons with diagnosed Severe Mental Illness (Schizophrenia, Bipolar Affective Disorder, or Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder) and to risky sexual behaviors, 8 caregivers (who had patients with severe mental illness and to risky sexual behaviors) and 12 mental health specialists, (who had treated these participants). Purposive sampling was done by intentionally selecting participants based on specific attributes relevant to the research question and the objective of the study which was to explore the factors contributing vulnerability to risky sexual behaviour in severe mental illness in central and south-western Uganda. The interviews were conducted, centered on personal experiences and influences on risky sexual behaviors for the persons with severe mental illness, targeting insights into the nuanced interplay of severe mental illness and sexual behavior. For caregivers and mental health specialists, the interviews were conducted to gain a comprehensive understanding of the unique challenges, perspectives, and experiences they encounter in providing support and treatment respectively. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis of transcribed interviews, using NVivo11 software that helped to systematically organize and code data within the predetermined and emergent thematic framework, we were able to identify patterns and themes to address the research question and objective.ResultsThe study findings underscored a pervasive pattern of engaging in risky sexual behavior among individuals coping with severe mental illness, a growing concern traditionally associated with sexually transmitted infections like HIV and AIDS, unwanted pregnancies, and sexual encounters with strangers. This problem was largely attributed to factors such as compromised judgment due to underlying morbidity, abnormally high libido, poverty, desperation, and inadequate social support. Additionally, sexual deprivation, often a result of stigma, discrimination, and prolonged periods of hospitalization, was found to contribute to irresponsible and risky sexual acts. Respondents also highlighted certain practices and structural weaknesses within hospital environments, such as stripping patients naked when going to seclusion rooms and inadequate patient monitoring.ConclusionsThe findings underscore the need for targeted interventions addressing both individual and structural factors to alleviate the risks associated with sexual behavior among individuals with severe mental illness.

Space for youth mental health-coercive measure use before and after architectural innovation at a department of child and adolescent psychiatry.

Influence of architectural features in child and adolescent psychiatric wards on coercive measure use has not been investigated so far. We aimed to assess the effect of altering the physical environment of an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit on the proportion and frequency of adolescents experiencing mechanical coercive measures. In a naturalistic observational design, coercive measures were compared before and after an architectural intervention facilitated by rebuilding a child and adolescent psychiatric department in October 2020. Age, gender, length of stay, main psychiatric diagnosis and indices of coercion in n = 782 admissions to inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry from April 2019 to April 2022 were extracted. Group comparisons were performed using chi-squared tests for categorical and Mann-Whitney U-tests for numerical variables. After structural modernization which included amplifying space and with the newly introduced availability of seclusion rooms, significantly fewer patients were affected by mechanical restraint (8.1% vs. 13.7%, p = .013). Rate of seclusion increased to 5.0% (vs. 0%, p < .001). Rate of seclusion and/or restraint decreased from 13.7% to 11.8% (p = .425). The median cumulative duration of all coercive measures per affected case decreased significantly (2.8 vs. 5.4 h, p = .005), as well as its proportion to length of stay (0.8% vs. 2.8%, p = .006). Modernisation and restructuring of buildings hosting psychiatric departments can contribute to a reduction of coercive measures in child and adolescent psychiatric units.

Patient perspective on observation methods used in seclusion room in an Irish forensic mental health setting: A qualitative study.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Nurses' observation of patients in seclusion is essential to ensure patient safety. Patient observation in seclusion assists nurses in adhering to the requirements of mental health legislation and hospital policy. Direct observation and video monitoring are widely used in observing patients in seclusion. Coercive practices may cause distress to patient-staff relations. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: We add detailed information on specific observation methods in seclusion and compare them from the perspective of patients. Nurses communicating with patients ensures relational contact and that quality care is provided to patients even in the most distressed phase of their illness. Providing prior information to patients on observation methods in seclusion and the need for engaging patients in meaningful activities, while in seclusion are emphasized. Observation via camera and nurses' presence near the seclusion room made patients feel safe and gave a sense of being cared for in seclusion. Pixellating the video camera would give a sense of privacy and dignity. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The overarching goal is to prevent seclusion. However, when seclusion is used as a last resort to manage risk to others, it should be done in ways that recognize the human rights of the patient, in ways that are least harmful, and in ways that recognize and cater to patients' unique needs. A consistent approach to relational contact and communication is essential. A care plan must include patient's preferred approach for interacting while in seclusion to support individualized care provision. Viewing panels (small window on the seclusion door) are important in establishing two-way communication with the patient. Educating nurses to utilize them correctly helps stimulate relational contact and communication during seclusion to benefit patients. Engaging patients in meaningful activities when in seclusion is essential to keep them connected to the outside world. Depending on the patient's presentation in the seclusion room and their preferences for interactions, reading newspapers, poems, stories, or a book chapter aloud to patients, via the viewing panel could help ensure such connectedness. More focus should be placed on providing communication training to nurses to strengthen their communication skills in caring for individuals in challenging care situations. Patient education is paramount. Providing prior information to patients using a co-produced information leaflet might reduce their anxiety and make them feel safe in the room. When using cameras in the seclusion room, these should be pixelated to maintain patients' privacy. ABSTRACT: Introduction A lack of research investigating the specific role that various observational techniques may have in shaping the therapeutic relations in mental health care during seclusion warranted this study. Aim The aim of the study was to explore patients' experience of different methods of observation used while the patient was in seclusion. Method A retrospective phenomenological approach, using semi-structured interviews, ten patients' experiences of being observed in the seclusion room was investigated. Colaizzi's descriptive phenomenological method was followed to analyse the data. Results Communicating and engaging patients in meaningful activities can be achieved via the viewing panel. The camera was considered essential in monitoring behaviour and promoting a sense of safety. Pixelating the camera may transform patient view on privacy in seclusion. Discussion The mental health services must strive to prevent seclusion and every effort should be made to recognise the human rights of the patient. The study reveals numerous advantages when nurses actively engage in patient communication during the process of observation. Implications for Practice Different observation methods yield different benefits; therefore, staff education in using these methods is paramount. Empowering the patient with prior information on seclusion, engaging them in meaningful activities and proper documentation on patient engagement, supports the provision of individualised care in seclusion.

Protest behaviors among patients placed in seclusion in a psychiatric emergency service.

Patients placed in seclusion for behavioral dyscontrol often perceive that the health care team is treating them inappropriately. These patients may express their indignation in many ways. To better characterize these behaviors, we conducted a study of protest behaviors in a psychiatric emergency service. Video surveillance of seclusion room occupants is routinely reviewed as part of our safety protocol. For 1 month in 2022, we noted the frequency and timing of potential protest behaviors such as disrobing and evacuation. Descriptive statistics were applied. A total of 41 seclusion events (8.1%) occurred over the surveillance period, which included 504 initial emergency psychiatric evaluations. Six patients (14.6%) engaged in protest behaviors (all within 5 minutes of being placed in seclusion), including 3 (7.3%) who urinated and 3 (7.3%) who disrobed. One patient urinated almost immediately (2.4%), and another urinated 25 minutes after entering seclusion; the latter was not interpreted as a protest behavior. Immediate behaviors in seclusion that are different from behaviors that led to seclusion can be interpreted as protest behaviors. The 2 most often observed protest behaviors were urination and disrobing.

The existential dimension of the experience of seclusion: a qualitative study among former psychiatric inpatients

BackgroundSeclusion is a coercive measure - temporary confinement in an almost empty, non-stimulating room in a closed psychiatric admission ward to prevent (further) urgent danger due to a mental disorder. Although there is observational research about patients’ behaviors during separation (e.g. hitting walls or doors, sleeping, or praying), research into the subjective and existential dimension of the experience of seclusion in psychiatry is rare.AimAim of the current study is to describe and analyze - using the theoretical lenses of Yalom (1980) and Jaspers (1919) - how clients experience their involuntary stay in a seclusion room in a closed psychiatric clinic in existential terms.MethodsA qualitative study was carried out among former clients (N = 10) who were asked, in retrospect, about their existential concerns in the seclusion room. In the thematic analysis, the main, deductive codes were theory based (Yalom, Jaspers), composed of subcodes that were inductively derived from the interviews.ResultsThe respondents affirmed the ultimate existential concerns about death (e.g. sensing to be dead already), lack of freedom (e.g. loss of agency), isolation (e.g. interpersonal, not able to speak, feeling an object) and meaninglessness. With respect to the latter, the respondents reported a rich variety of spiritual experiences (both negative, such as knowing to be in hell, as positive, hearing/imagining a comforting voice or noticing/imagining a scenery of nature in the room).DiscussionAlthough some experiences and behaviors may conflate with symptoms of psychosis, the participants generally expressed a relief about the ability to talk about their experiences. Sharing and discussing the existential experiences fits into the paradigm of psychiatric recovery and personalized care. Their intensity was obvious and might have warranted additional support by a chaplain or spiritual counselor in mental health care settings.

Soins sans consentement, mesures d’isolement et de contention en pédopsychiatrie : une analyse des défis éthiques en France

BackgroundIn France, child psychiatry care can involve significant ethical challenges. Following the last recommendations of the Controller General of places of deprivation of liberty (CGLPL) and the modifications of the law framing the control measures (seclusion room and restraints) in adult psychiatry, it is necessary to reflect on their operationalization in providing care in order to find the balance between the imperatives of protection and the respect of the young people hospitalized in child psychiatry. AimTo develop recommendations concerning the use of seclusion and restraint in child psychiatry in the light of recent legislative changes and associated ethical issues. MethodsWithin the framework of the national commission of psychiatry, a working group bringing together many child psychiatrists was set up in 2021 to reflect on contemporary issues in our discipline. One of the axes studied – in connection with the forensic psychiatry group – was specifically concerned with isolation and restraint in child psychiatry. An analysis of the ethical issues based on the four principles of Beauchamp and Childress is defined and adapted for the child psychiatric context. ResultsThe working group identified the legal and ethical issues specific to their discipline. Based on the ethical analysis of two difficult support situations in child psychiatry: (1) the practice of electroconvulsive therapy with adolescents; and (2) the management of violence in young people with autism and intellectual disabilities, the main conflicts of values were identified referring to the principles of non-maleficience, beneficence, autonomy and justice. ConclusionBased on research in childhood ethics, the relational dimension of autonomy is discussed with reference to the concepts of “shared vulnerability” and “shared care planning”. Specific recommendations for child psychiatry are proposed in order to promote the recognition as moral agents of children and adolescents hospitalized in child psychiatry.

Nurses' perceptions of nurse-patient communication in seclusion rooms in psychiatric inpatient care: A focus group study.

INTRODUCTION: Communication between nurses and patients is essential in mental health nursing. In coercive situations (e.g. seclusion), the importance of nurse-patient communication is highlighted. However, research related to nurses' perceptions of nurse-patient communication during seclusion is scant. The aim of this study was to describe nurses' perceptions of nurse-patient communication during patient seclusion and the ways nurse-patient communication can be improved. A qualitative study design using focus group interviews was adopted. Thirty-two nurses working in psychiatric wards were recruited to participate. The data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. Nurses aimed to communicate in a patient-centred way in seclusion events, and various issues affected the quality of communication. Nurses recognized several ways to improve communication during seclusion. Treating patients in seclusion rooms presents highly demanding care situations for nurses. Seclusion events require nurses to have good communication skills to provide ethically sound care. Improved nurse-patient communication may contribute to shorter seclusion times and a higher quality of care. Improving nurses' communication skills may help support the dignity of the secluded patients. Safewards practices, such as respectful communication and recognizing the effect of non-verbal behaviour, could be considered when developing nurse-patient communication in seclusion events. This study deepens the understanding of nurse-patient communication during seclusion events from the perspective of nurses. Caring for patients in seclusion presents challenging situations for nurses and demands that they have good communication skills. To enhance their communication skills in seclusion events, nurses require opportunities to take part in further training after education related to communication skills for demanding care situations. Knowing the appropriate ways to interact with individual patients during seclusion can help nurses create and maintain communication with patients. For mental health nursing, nurses' enhanced communication may promote increased use of noncoercive practices in psychiatric settings. For patients, improving nurses' communication skills may help support dignity and autonomy during seclusion and shorten the time spent in seclusion, resulting in a better quality of care and more positive patient experiences related to care offered in seclusion. In this, the perspectives of people with lived experience of mental health problems should be acknowledged. Components of Safewards practices, such as using respectful and individual communication and paying attention to one's non-verbal communication (Soft Words), could be useful when developing nurse-patient communication in seclusion events.

APA Resource Document Outlines Principles on Use of Seclusion, Restraint

APA Resource Document Outlines Principles on Use of Seclusion, Restraint

Patient Falls in Seclusion Rooms in Psychiatric Inpatient Care: A Sociotechnical Probabilistic Risk Modeling Study.

Patient falls are a major adverse event in psychiatric inpatient care. To model the risk for patient falls in seclusion rooms in psychiatric inpatient care. Sociotechnical probabilistic risk assessment (ST-PRA) was used to model the risk for falls. Data sources were the research team, literature review, and exploration groups of psychiatric nurses. Data were analyzed with fault tree analysis. The risk for a patient fall in a seclusion room was 1.8%. Critical paths included diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder, the mechanism of falls, failure to assess and prevent falls, and psychological or physical reason. The most significant individual risk factor for falls was diagnosis of schizophrenia. Falls that occur in seclusion events are associated with physical and psychological risk factors. Therefore, risk assessment methods and fall prevention interventions considering patient behavioral disturbance and physiological risk factors in seclusion are warranted.

Seclusion in a Moroccan Adult Psychiatry Unit

Despite significant advances in the pharmacological treatment of mental disorders, seclusion is still used in daily practice for patients hospitalized in Moroccan psychiatric institutions. Staff generally prefers to avoid using these procedures, as they limit the patient's freedom and undermine his or her dignity. However, it is sometimes necessary to do so to manage extreme episodes of dangerous behavior that threatens the safety of the patient and those around them. We aim in this study to identify the factors that impact the average duration of seclusion and to deduce, if possible, recommendations and measures to optimize or even reduce this time. This is a one-year retrospective study, conducted in the psychiatric department of IBN ROCHD University hospital in Casablanca-Morocco. The study includes data from 169 patients admitted during the entire year of 2018. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with the duration of seclusion. Based on the results of our study, it appears that the only socio- demographic factor that has a significant impact on the duration of the isolation is marital status. Also, for patients with a personal psychiatric history, the isolation was shorter. Furthermore, it was observed that patients who self-harmed resided longer in seclusion rooms. Regarding the medical diagnosis, it seems that schizoaffective disorder is the only diagnosis that leads to a longer period of isolation than others. Post-seclusion observations indicate that patients whose condition has deteriorated are placed in an extended placement. Although seclusion is not part of the patient's standard treatment, such an intervention may be implemented as an emergency treatment for patients exhibiting behavior that is dangerous to themselves or others. In addition, it would also be necessary to consider Morocco’s reality with its cultural aspects but also to deal with the lack of human and material resources from which our health care system suffers

An Evidence-Based Educational Intervention for Reducing Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Hospitals

Investing in health care staffs' education can change the scope of action and improve care. The effectiveness of staff education remains inconclusive. To examine whether an evidence-based educational intervention for nurses decreases the use of seclusion rooms in psychiatric hospitals compared with usual practice. In this pragmatic, 2-arm parallel, stratified cluster randomized clinical trial, 28 wards in 15 psychiatric hospitals in Finland were screened for eligibility and randomly allocated (1:1). Nurses joined on either intervention (n = 13) or usual practice (n = 15) wards. The intervention was performed from May 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017. The follow-up data for January 1 to December 31, 2017, were collected from hospital registers in 2018. Data analysis was performed October 27, 2021. Evidence-based education delivered during 18 months, including 8 months of active education, followed by a 10-month maintenance period. The primary outcome was the occurrence of patient seclusion (events per total number of patients). Of 28 psychiatric hospital wards screened (437 beds and 648 nurses), 27 wards completed the study. A total of 8349 patients were receiving care in the study wards, with 53% male patients and a mean (SD) age of 40.6 (5.7) years. The overall number of seclusions was 1209 (14.5%) in 2015 and 1349 (16.5%) in 2017. In the intervention group, the occurrence rate of seclusion at the ward level decreased by 5.3% from 629 seclusions among 4163 patients (15.1%) to 585 seclusions among 4089 patients (14.3%) compared with a 34.7% increase from 580 seclusions among 4186 patients (13.9%) to 764 seclusions among 4092 patients (18.7%) in the usual practice group. The adjusted rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.40-1.82) in 2015 and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31-1.41) in 2017 (P = .003). However, the number of forced injections increased in the intervention group from 317 events among 4163 patients (7.6%) in 2015 to 486 events among 4089 patients (11.9%) in 2017 compared with an increase in the usual practice group from 414 events among 4186 patients (9.9%) in 2015 to 481 events among 4092 patients (11.8%) in 2017. Seven adverse events were reported. In this randomized clinical trial, the educational intervention had a limited effect on the change of occurrence rate of patient seclusion, whereas the use of forced injections increased. More studies are needed to better understand the reasons for these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02724748.

Change over time: the use of seclusion in secure residential youth care in The Netherlands

ABSTRACT Seclusion can be harmful for children and adolescents. Hence, all locations for secure residential youth care in the Netherlands are committed to reduce its use by implementing monitoring and feedback as a seclusion reduction intervention. This study examined change over time in the use of seclusion in secure residential youth care in the Netherlands using a broad conceptualization of seclusion and by analyzing four variables (frequency, duration, room, reason). During two six months periods, seclusions were registered in 19 locations. Every month, all locations received feedback on the use of seclusion. Negative binomial mixed model analyses were used to investigate change over time in frequency and duration of seclusion. Logistic mixed model analyses were used to identify change over time in reason for use and type of room used for seclusion. Results showed that seclusion frequency significantly decreased (RR = 0.92, p < .001). Further, duration of placement in a seclusion room significantly increased (RR = 1.04, p < .001). This change was only significant in seclusion in response to aggression (RR = 1.06, p < .001). The results emphasize the need for future studies to examine reduction using a broad conceptualization of seclusion.

La Palette des émotions : une médiation graphique pour améliorer les pratiques d’isolement et de contention

Background and objectivesThe use of seclusion and restraint within mental health settings has long been considered controversial. According to the literature, patient experiences of seclusion and restraint are mainly negative, harmful or traumatic. Patients express a need to discuss the seclusion or restraint event and their feelings afterwards. This paper describes the Emotional Palette, a graphical tool for enhancing patients’ expression of emotional experience after seclusion or restraint. Materials and methodsOn the basis of a focused review of literature, demonstrating the relevance of investigating patients’ experiences after seclusion or restraint, this article presents the Emotional Palette, a graphic tool created in a psychiatric ward for helping patients express their emotional experience. This graphical tool (figure 1) consists of a coloured checkerboard which presents terms typically used to express emotions relating to seclusion or restraint's experience. Each term is associated with a colour, ranging from red (negative feeling) to white (intermediate feeling) and green (positive feeling). Patients are interviewed a few days after seclusion. Firstly, they are asked to complete three Emotional Palettes, which refer to three moments of their experience : the time when they were put inside the seclusion room, the time spent during the seclusion process, and the time after the seclusion. For each moment, patients identify the predominant emotions on the corresponding Palette. After completing the Palettes, they are interviewed. The aim is to promote a relationship of confidence to make the persons feel free to say what they like. They are also encouraged to express their own proposals for alternative methods and suggestions for improving seclusion practice. In this article, the usefulness of the approach based on this tool is discussed within three clinical case studies. For each patient the result of the Emotional Palette was transcribed and a thematic analysis was used to analyse the verbatim. ResultsThe seclusion-related negative emotions mainly identified by patients were fear, anger, boredom, helplessness, resignation, loneliness and humiliation. Negative feelings were linked to perceived lack of interaction with the staff before and during seclusion. Patients reported that they were not given enough information about the reason for their seclusion and what would happen next. After the seclusion process, they mentioned positive experiences such as finding calm, gratitude and confidence in the nursing staff. Some patients’ suggestions regarding the improvement of seclusion practices were related to a need for more interaction with nurses and doctors. These emotions and views expressed by patients echo the findings of previous studies and surveys. Beyond these results, the main benefit lies in the fact that, by giving the opportunity to have a debrief, the Emotional Palette tends to strengthen the patient's position and involvement. All of them expressed a satisfaction to be able to discuss the seclusion event and their feelings afterwards. They suggested alternatives to seclusion that could expressly work for them (one-to-one intervention, specific activities..). They stressed the importance of interaction with the nurses and the doctors, through empathetic listening, attention and understanding, active communication and for more staff presence in the ward. Thanks to the Emotional Palette, patients experienced that their views and emotions had been heard and recognized. Finally, by giving every patient an opportunity to discuss his/her experience with the staff, the Emotional Palette helps to develop a personal prevention strategy that could offer alternative methods for seclusion in case of crisis. Future research is needed to provide generalizable data and validate the usefulness of the Emotional Palette. ConclusionsBy helping patients to express their emotions after a seclusion process, the Emotional Palette offers a framework and a therapeutic approach which prove useful in regaining a positive interpersonal relationship with a patient. By allowing the patient to give their views and suggestions for improvement and alternatives, this tool could also constitute a means to reduce seclusion practices.

Non-contact physical health monitoring in mental health seclusion

Background: Patients in mental health services' seclusion require regular physical health assessments to identify, prevent and manage clinical deterioration. Sometimes it may be unsafe or counter-therapeutic for clinical staff to enter the seclusion room, making it challenging to meet local seclusion standards for physical assessments. Alternatives to standard clinical assessment models are required in such circumstances to assure high quality and safe care. Aim: The primary aim was to improve the quality of physical health monitoring by making accurate vital sign measurements more frequently available. Secondary aims were to explore the clinical experience of integrating a technological innovation with routine clinical care. Method: A non-contact monitoring device was installed in the mental health seclusion room and was used in addition to existing clinical care. Over six months, adherence to local clinical guidelines was compared against a time- period prior to installation. Feedback was sought from staff and patients through questionnaires and focus groups. A quality improvement framework was used to continually improve the process using plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles. Results : The non-contact monitoring device enabled a 12.3-fold increase overall in the monitoring of physical health observations when compared to a real-world baseline rate of checks. Enhancement to standard clinical care varied according to patient movement levels. Patients, carers and staff expressed positive views towards the integration of the technological intervention.Conclusion: The non-contact monitoring device improved the quality and safety of care by increasing availability of physical health monitoring. It was positively received by patients, carers and staff.

Nursing Practice for Patients with Schizophrenia Admitted to the Seclusion Room of the Psychiatric Emergency Ward Due to Acute Symptoms

Nursing Practice for Patients with Schizophrenia Admitted to the Seclusion Room of the Psychiatric Emergency Ward Due to Acute Symptoms

The Forensic Supplement to the interRAI Mental Health Assessment Instrument: Evaluation and Validation of the Problem Behavior Scale.

Background: Numerous validation studies support the use of the interRAI Mental Health (MH) assessment system for inpatient mental health assessment, triage, treatment planning, and outcome measurement. However, there have been suggestions that the interRAI MH does not include sufficient content relevant to forensic mental health. We address this potential deficiency through the development of a Forensic Supplement (FS) to the interRAI MH system. Using three forensic risk assessment instruments (PCL-R; HCR-20; VRAG) that had a record of independent cross validation in the forensic literature, we identified forensic content domains that were missing in the interRAI MH. We then independently developed items to provide forensic coverage. The resulting FS is a single-page, 19-item supplementary document that can be scored along with the interRAI MH, adding approximately 10–15 min to administration time.We constructed the Problem Behavior Scale (PBS) using 11 items from the interRAI MH and FS. The Developmental Sample, 168 forensic mental health inpatients from two large mental health specialty hospitals, was assessed with both an earlier version of the interRAI MH and FS. This sample also provided us access to scores on the PCL-R, the HCR-20 and the VRAG. To validate our initial findings, we sought additional samples where scoring of the interRAI MH and the FS had been done. The first, the Forensic Sample (N = 587), consisted of forensic inpatients in other mental health units/hospitals. The second, the Correctional Sample (N = 618) was a random, representative sample of inmates in prisons, and the third, the Youth Sample (N = 90) comprised a group of youth in police custody.Results: The PBS ranged from 0 to 11, was positively skewed with most scores below 3, and had good internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.80). In a test of concurrent validity, correlations between PBS scores and forensic risk scores were moderate to high (i.e., r with PCL-R Factor two of 0.317; with HCR-20 Clinical of 0.46; and with HCR-20 Risk of 0.39). In a test of convergent validity, we used Binary Logistic Regression to demonstrate that the PBS was related to three negative patient experiences (recent verbal abuse, use of a seclusion room, and failure to attain an unaccompanied leave). For each of these three samples, we conducted the same convergent validity statistical analyses as we had for the Developmental Sample and the earlier findings were replicated. Finally, we examined the relationship between PBS scores and care planning triggers, part of the interRAI systems Clinical Assessment Protocols (CAPs). In all three validity samples, the PBS was significantly related to the following CAPs being triggered: Harm to Others, Interpersonal Conflict, Traumatic Life Events, and Control Interventions. These additional validations generalize our findings across age groups (adult, youth) and across health care and correctional settings.Conclusions: The FS improves the interRAI MH's ability to identify risk for negative patient experiences and assess clinical needs in hospitalized/incarcerated forensic patients. These results generalize across age groups and across health care and correctional settings.

Seclusion in an enriched environment versus seclusion as usual: A quasi-experimental study using mixed methods.

BackgroundFor patients, seclusion during psychiatric treatment is often a traumatic experience. To prevent such experiences, adjustments in the design of seclusion rooms have been recommended.MethodsAs there have been no empirical studies on the matter, we used a quasi-experimental design to compare the experiences in seclusion of two groups of patients: 26 who had been secluded in a room designed according to the principles of healing environment, a so called ‘Enriched Environment Seclusion room’ (EES), and 27 who had been secluded in a regular seclusion (RS) room. The enrichment included audio-visual facilities, a fixed toilet, a couch and a self-service system to adjust light, colour, blinds and temperature according to the patient’s preferences. Insight into their experiences was obtained using the Patient View-of-Seclusion Questionnaire, which comprises nine statements on seclusion, supplemented with open-ended questions.ResultsThe responses regarding seclusion experiences between the two groups did not differ significantly (U = 280.00, p = .21, r = -.17). Although those who had been secluded in the specially designed room had greatly appreciated the opportunities for distraction, and those who had been secluded in a regular seclusion room expressed the need for more distracting activities during seclusion, both groups described seclusion as a dreadful experience. If seclusion cannot be avoided, patients recommend facilities for distraction (such as those provided in an enriched environment seclusion room) to be available.ConclusionWhatever the physical environment and facilities of a seclusion room, we may thus conclude that seclusion is a burdensome experience.

Safety hazards in patient seclusion events in psychiatric care: A video observation study.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Coercive measures such as seclusion are used to maintain the safety of patients and others in psychiatric care. The use of coercive measures can lead to harm among patients and staff. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This study is the first of its kind to rely on video observation to expose safety hazards in seclusion events that have not been reported previously in the literature. The actions that both patients and staff take during seclusion events can result in various safety hazards. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Constant monitoring of patients during seclusion is important for identifying safety hazards and intervening to prevent harm. Nursing staff who use seclusion need to be aware of how their actions can contribute to safety hazards and how they can minimize their potential for harm ABSTRACT: Introduction Seclusion is used to maintain safety in psychiatric care. There is still a lack of knowledge on potential safety hazards related to seclusion practices. Aim To identify safety hazards that might jeopardize the safety of patients and staff in seclusion events in psychiatric hospital care. Method A descriptive design with non-participant video observation was used. The data consisted of 36 video recordings, analysed with inductive thematic analysis. Results Safety hazards were related to patient and staff actions. Patient actions included aggressive behaviour, precarious movements, escaping, falling, contamination and preventing visibility. Staff actions included leaving hazardous items in a seclusion room, unsafe administration of medication, unsecured use of restraints and precarious movements and postures. Discussion This is the first observational study to identify safety hazards in seclusion, which may jeopardize the safety of patients and staff. These hazards were related to the actions of patients and staff. Implications for Practice Being better aware of possible safety hazards could help prevent adverse events during patient seclusion events. It is therefore necessary that nursing staff are aware of how their actions might impact their safety and the safety of the patients. Video observation is a useful method for identifying safety hazards. However, its use requires effort to safeguard the privacy and confidentiality of those included in the videos.