Sorption of Mo to goethite and related iron (hydr)oxides plays an important role in controlling the mobility of Mo in soil and aquatic environments. We first performed ab-initio molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of Mo complexation at the goethite {1 0 1}-water interface. We find that molybdenum adsorbed on goethite mainly exists as the inner-sphere tetrahedral bidentate and monodentate corner-sharing complex, instead of the previous argued bidentate edge-sharing or outer-sphere complex. Different from previous literature, we didn’t find any distorted octahedral structure of Mo on goethite. The predicted Mo-Fe distances of bidentate and monodentate corner-sharing complex based on ab-initio MD is 3.53 and 3.38 Å, respectively, which are consistent with the fitted Mo-Fe distances: 3.40 ± 0.15 Å and 3.41 ± 0.1 Å from EXAFS.We measured the adsorption of Mo (VI) on goethite (α-FeOOH) at different initial concentration and pH from 3 to 11 under N2 atmosphere and constructed a surface complexation model that is consistent with the molecular speciation based on ab-initio MD, XANES, EXAFS and reported in-situ ATR-IR analysis (Davantes and Lefevre, 2015, 2016). Application of SCM for Mo on goethite assuming iron oxides as the principal component of ferromanganese crust (containing average 276 mg/kg Mo) will have ∼0.3 μg/l Mo in seawater in equilibrium. The observed ∼10 μg/l Mo in seawater (c a. 400–800 yr) is between 0.3 (adsorption equilibrium by marine goethite) and 23 μg/l (adsorption equilibrium by marine birnessite, Kashiwabara et al., 2011), suggesting that molybdenum in seawater has reached equilibrium with ferromanganese crust, and goethite (57%) probably plays a more important role than birnessite (43%) in regulating molybdenum abundance in the ocean, which has not been fully recognized in past.Observed molybdenum isotopic fractionation between seawater and ferromanganese crust excesses the experimental molybdenum isotopic fractionation range during adsorption by birnessite and goethite (Goldberg et al., 2009). Based on reported experimental molybdenum isotopic fractionation values and our SCM prediction, the molybdenum isotopic fractionation δ98/95Mo value should vary between 1.6 and 2.3‰, which is lower than the observed range between seawater and ferromanganese crust: 2.7–3.2‰ about 1‰, suggesting the disequilibrium of molybdenum isotopic fractionation in ocean. To clarify the discrepancy, this study highlights the necessity of clarifying the molybdenum source in hydrogenic and hydrothermal ferromanganese crusts before understanding molybdenum isotopic fractionation between seawater and ferromanganese crust.
Read full abstract