Search For Stimuli Research Articles

Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity

The presence of memory for rejected distractors during visual search has been heavily debated in the literature and has proven challenging to investigate behaviorally. In this research, we used an electrophysiological index of working memory (contralateral delay activity) to passively measure working memory activity during visual search. Participants were asked to indicate whether a novel target was present or absent in a lateralized search array with three visual set sizes (2, 4, or 6). If rejected distractors are maintained in working memory during search, working memory activity should increase with the number of distractors that need to be evaluated. Therefore, we predicted the amplitude of the contralateral delay activity would be larger for target-absent trials and would increase with visual set size until WM capacity was reached. In Experiment 1, we found no evidence for distractor maintenance in working memory during search for real-world stimuli. In Experiment 2, we found partial evidence in support of distractor maintenance during search for stimuli with high target/distractor similarity. In both experiments, working memory capacity did not appear to be a limiting factor during visual search. These results suggest the role of working memory during search may depend on the visual search task in question. Maintaining distractors in working memory appears to be unnecessary during search for realistic stimuli. However, there appears to be a limited role for distractor maintenance during search for artificial stimuli with a high degree of feature overlap.

Searching for bumps and ellipses on the ground and in the sky: No advantage for the ground plane

A staple of modern theories of vision is that the visual system has evolved to perceive cues containing the most predictive information about the layout of the environment. This entails the prediction that - other things being equal - visual performance in a familiar setting should be superior to performance in an unfamiliar one. Visual performance should therefore be better on the familiar ground plane compared to an implied sky or wall plane. We tested this comparing visual search for stimuli presented in an implied ground plane with search on a 180° rotated search display so that the stimuli appeared in an implied "sky" plane, and with search in a random layout implying no depth. This was tested for stimuli with, or without, curvature discontinuities, that have previously been shown to be strong cues for shape analysis. Surprisingly, no advantage of the ground plane over the sky plane was observed, while a strong effect of layout regularity was seen. Similarly, in experiment 2 there was little effect of placing the stimuli on an implied wall plane compared to the ground or the sky. The results are not explained by assuming that curvature discontinuities are such strong cues that they overshadow any effect of depth-plane, since there was a strong effect of regular versus random layout, which should also have disappeared under this account. The results argue instead for a very strong effect of layout regularity, unrelated to environmental regularities in evolutionary history, since there was no ground-plane benefit.

Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.

In visual search tasks, observers look for a target stimulus among distractor stimuli. A visual search asymmetry is said to occur when a search for stimulus A among stimulus B produces different results from a search for B among A. Anne Treisman made search asymmetries into an important tool in the study of visual attention. She argued that it was easier to find a target that was defined by the presence of a preattentive basic feature than to find a target defined by the absence of that feature. Four of the eight papers in this symposium in Perception & Psychophysics deal with the use of search asymmetries to identify stimulus attributes that behave as basic features in this context. Another two papers deal with the long-standing question of whether a novelty can be considered to be a basic feature. Asymmetries can also arise when one type of stimulus is easier to identify or classify than another. Levin and Angelone's paper on visual search for faces of different races is an examination of an asymmetry of this variety. Finally, Previc and Naegele investigate an asymmetry based on the spatial location of the target. Taken as a whole, these papers illustrate the continuing value of the search asymmetry paradigm.

Latence des réponses en mémoire immédiate : noms et figures géométriques

Summary When a series of nouns or of geometrical figures that are tachistoscopically presentee, are to be named, the first response latency increases as a linear function when the number of responses is equal to the number of stimuli. Response latency to geometrical figures is longer than response latency to nouns. The rate of successive responses with geometrical figures is lower than with nouns. With both types of material, when the number of responses is smaller than the number of stimuli, an increase in latency is observed. On the basis of these results, the author proposes a model of immediate memory in which lalencies are explained by the coding times of stimuli and responses and by the search for stimuli that the subject detected but could not identify.