Sirs: Ocular motor apraxia (OMA) is characterized by the loss of voluntary saccade control but the simultaneous preservation of saccades of the optokinetic and the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) [1, 4, 6]. While the suitability of the term is still being debated [6, 10], it is not yet clear which of the conceivable compensation strategies adult patients with OMA use to elicit saccades. Saccades can be initiated in three possible ways: by using the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) [2], signals of voluntary head commands [11], or blinks [2]. We tested for the first time the competing hypotheses in two adult patients with OMA to elucidate the mechanism that helps to restore the saccadic behaviour. The first patient, a 32-year-old woman without a relevant medical history, complained of slowly progressive blurred vision over recent years. She could only produce small vertical but not horizontal saccades on command or to predictive and unpredictive visual targets without concomitant head movements. However, she was able to make small horizontal and vertical saccades in the head-free condition, i. e., during small horizontal head movements or while reading. The vestibular-ocular reflex and optokinetic nystagmus were normal. Neurological examination was otherwise unremarkable, and cranial MRI was normal. The second patient, a 60-yearold man, had had difficulty in reading for several years. A neurological examination revealed that he could hardly make any saccades on command or to predictive and unpredictive targets in the vertical direction without making concomitant head movements. However, saccades could be elicited by optokinetic and vestibular stimuli. In addition, the patient had a right hemiparesis. MRI showed a large left-sided frontoparietal cortical infarction and additional subcortical ischemic lesions on the right side. Eye, head, and lid movements were recorded with the scleral search-coil method, calibrated, and analysed as reported elsewhere [8, 9]. Statistical tests were performed using Student’s t-test and ANOVA with p-values of less than 0.05 for statistical significance. The subject’s head was measured with (head-fixed condition) and without a fixed head support (head-free condition) [8, 9]. Visually guided horizontal and vertical saccades (5 to 20 deg amplitudes) were examined in both conditions. Four healthy aged-matched subjects out of a group of 21 (aged 46 ± 13 years) were used as controls for the head-fixed condition. For the comparison of the two recording conditions (head-fixed vs. head-free) the patients’ latencies were individually compared with two aged-matched control subjects. In the head-fixed condition patient #1 made virtually no visually guided saccades in the horizontal direction (Fig. 1A); patient #2 made virtually none in the vertical direction. Saccades were delayed and hypometric compared with those of the healthy control subjects (Table 1). In the age-matched control subjects there was no difference in the latencies between the head-free (224 + 42 ms) and the head-fixed condition (217 + 38 ms) measured in the same experimental session. In the head-free condition horizontal and vertical visually guided saccades were elicited in both patients (Table 1; Fig. 1B). However, head movements were much more prominent in the patients than in controls (Fig. 1B and E, thin black LETTER TO THE EDITORS