Screening Tool To Alert Doctors To Right Treatment Criteria Research Articles

What Is the Medication Iatrogenic Risk in Elderly Outpatients for Chronic Pain?

Medication iatrogeny is a major public health problem that increases as the population ages. Therapeutic escalation to control pain and associated disorders could increase polypharmacy and iatrogeny. This study aimed to characterize the medication iatrogenic risk of elderly outpatients with chronic pain. This was a prospective cohort study recruiting patients 65 years or older with chronic pain. A medication iatrogenic assessment was performed based on the best possible medication history to record risk of adverse drug events (Trivalle score), STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria, and potentially inappropriate medications. We recruited 100 patients with an average age of 71 years. The median number of medications before pain consultation was 8 (interquartile range = [7;11]). Trivalle score showed that 43% of patients were at moderate or high medication iatrogenic risk. Before consultation, 79% and 75% of patients had at least 1 STOPP or START criterion on their orders, respectively. One-third of orders mentioned benzodiazepine prescribed for more than 4 weeks. At least 1 potentially inappropriate medication was prescribed for 54% of the patients, with a median of 1 per patient (interquartile range = [0;1]). A combination of several anticholinergics was prescribed in 23% of patients. Elderly patients with chronic pain are at risk of medication iatrogeny. Preventive measures as multidisciplinary medication review could reduce the iatrogenic risk in these outpatients.This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04006444 on July 3, 2019.

Use of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care to Assess Inappropriate Polypharmacy in Young Seniors With Multimorbidity: Observational, Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study.

BackgroundMultimorbidity is a global health problem that is usually associated with polypharmacy, which increases the risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). PIP entails higher hospitalization rates and mortality and increased usage of services provided by the health system. Tools exist to improve prescription practices and decrease PIP, including screening tools and explicit criteria that can be applied in an automated manner.ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe the prevalence of PIP in primary care consultations among patients aged 65-75 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, detected by an electronic clinical decision support system (ECDSS) following the 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, the European Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescription (STOPP), and the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START).MethodsThis was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. The sample included 593 community-dwelling adults aged 65-75 years (henceforth called young seniors), with multimorbidity (≥3 diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications), who had visited their primary care doctor at least once over the last year at 1 of the 38 health care centers participating in the Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy in Primary Care (Multi-PAP) trial. Sociodemographic data, clinical and pharmacological treatment variables, and PIP, as detected by 1 ECDSS, were recorded. A multivariate logistic regression model with robust estimators was built to assess the factors affecting PIP according to the STOPP criteria.ResultsPIP was detected in 57.0% (338/593; 95% CI 53-61) and 72.8% (432/593; 95% CI 69.3-76.4) of the patients according to the STOPP criteria and the Beers Criteria, respectively, whereas 42.8% (254/593; 95% CI 38.9-46.8) of the patients partially met the START criteria. The most frequently detected PIPs were benzodiazepines (BZD) intake for more than 4 weeks (217/593, 36.6%) using the STOPP version 2 and the prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors (269/593, 45.4%) using the 2015 Beers Criteria. Being a woman (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.01; P=.04), taking a greater number of medicines (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37; P<.04), working in the primary sector (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25-2.93; P=.003), and being prescribed drugs for the central nervous system (OR 3.75, 95% CI 2.45-5.76; P<.001) were related to a higher frequency of PIP.ConclusionsThere is a high prevalence of PIP in primary care as detected by an ECDSS in community-dwelling young seniors with comorbidity and polypharmacy. The specific PIP criteria defined by this study are consistent with the current literature. This ECDSS can be useful for supervising prescriptions in primary health care consultations.

Atención farmacéutica de adultos mayores. Aplicación de los criterios STOPP-START

IntroductionDrug-related problems can be caused by potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), one of the most used tools for its identification are the STOPP (Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) - START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria. The objective of this study is to determine PIP in older adults who receive pharmaceutical care in the Pharmacotherapy Optimization Unit (POU)-Rosario. Materials and methodsPharmacoepidemiological observational study, which evaluates the quality of medication use. Workplace: POU-Rosario. Population under study: adults over 60 years of age, who received pharmacotherapy follow-up during the period March 2017 to February 2018. PIPs were identified using the STOPP-START criteria, 2014 version; selecting the most appropriate criteria to assess outpatient pharmacotherapy. Prevalence of PIP and amount of PIP per active principle were estimated. Results50 patients older than 60 years received pharmacotherapy follow-up in the POU; 47 patients (94.0%) had at least one PIP corresponding to a STOPP criterion; 17 STOPP criteria were found among the 41 initially selected, leading to 145 PIPs identified. And 7 START criteria among the 11 initially selected, leading to 50 PIPs identified. Medications with a higher amount of PIPs: benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors. ConclusionsThis study allowed the identification of a high prevalence of PIP. The data obtained show the usefulness of these criteria. The STOPP-START criteria have been included to support decision making during pharmacotherapy follow-up to propose pharmaceutical interventions, in order to enhance pharmacotherapy. These activities contribute to patient safety, a dimension of health quality.

Use of the STOPP and START criteria to address polypharmacy for elderly patients in University Hospital Lewisham Clinical Decisions Unit

Background: Polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing are risk factors for adverse drug reactions, which commonly cause complications in older people. The STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment) criteria are screening tools, which aim to improve prescribing in the elderly. Objectives: The aim was to improve prescribing, using the STOPP/START criteria, for patients aged 65 and above, who were admitted to the Clinical Decisions Unit at University Hospital Lewisham. We focused on the most common prescribing errors in clinical decision unit, an emergency medicine department. Methods: We reviewed all patients aged 65 and above admitted to the Clinical Decisions Unit in September. Data was collected from clinical documentation and archived drug charts. This pilot study of 114 patients revealed the most common prescribing errors, of which 8 were STOPP and 11 were START criteria. A plan–do–study–act methodology was implemented over 1 month, involving presentations, emails and posters. Prescribing patterns were then reviewed over 4 weeks in December in 111 patients. Results: Focusing on the 8 STOPP and 11 START criteria, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with at least one STOPP error (17.5% to 9%, p = 0.04). However, the decrease in the percentage of patients with at least one START error was insignificant (24.6% to 20.7%, p = 0.24). Conclusion: By identifying problematic areas of prescribing and using targeted interventions, the proportion of STOPP errors made in clinical decision unit reduced significantly. This study highlights the prevalence of prescription errors in the clinical decision unit and the impact of using screening tools to reduce incorrect prescribing.

The impact of medication review with version 2 STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria in a French nursing home: a 3-month follow-up study.

Background:Improving medication appropriateness is a priority of French national campaigns in nursing homes. A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a medication review in a French nursing home with a 3-month follow up.Method:A medication review was conducted in 2015 using version 2 STOPP and START criteria. The number and type of drugs meeting a STOPP that were reintroduced and the number and type of drug meeting a START that were stopped during follow up were measured. An expert committee adjudicated whether 3-month hospitalizations and deaths were related to medication review. The impact of medication review on the cost related to drug consumption was calculated for 3 months.Results:The 52 residents (age 84 ± 9 years, 83% female) fulfilled, on average, 2 ± 1.4 of the STOPP criteria and 0.7 ± 0.6 of the START criteria. A total of 101 drugs were stopped and 34 drugs were started. Five deaths occurred during follow up and were judged as not related to medication review. Five drugs stopped were reintroduced in five residents for a rebound effect or a symptom occurrence and one resident had stopped a START medication (aspirin) for a minor adverse drug reaction. At 3 months, a gain of 20.21 ± 31.34 euros per resident was observed.Conclusion:The medication review using version 2 STOPP and START criteria and involving the physician in charge seems useful for detecting and correcting inappropriate prescribing in a nursing home.

Drug-related problems identified during medication review before and after the introduction of a clinical decision support system.

To facilitate the identification of drug-related problems (DRPs) during medication review, several tools have been developed. Explicit criteria, like Beers criteria or STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Peoples' Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria, can easily be integrated into a clinical decision support system (CDSS). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adding a CDSS to medication review software on identifying and solving DRPs in daily pharmacy practice. Pre- to post-analysis of clinical medication reviews (CMRs) performed by 121 pharmacies in 2012 and 2013, before and after the introduction of CDSS into medication review software. Mean number of DRPs per patient, type of DRPs and their resolution rates were compared in the pharmacies pre- and post-CDSS using paired t tests. In total, 9151 DRPs were identified in 3100 patients pre-CDSS and 15268 DRPs were identified in 4303 patients post-CDSS. The mean number of identified DRPs per patient (aggregated per pharmacy) was higher after the introduction of CDSS (3.2 vs 3.6 P<.01). The resolution rate was lower post-CDSS (50% vs 44%; P<.01), which overall resulted in 1.6 resolved DRPs per patient in both groups (P=.93). After the introduction of CDSS, 41% of DRPs were detected by the CDSS. The resolution rate of DRPs generated by CDSS was lower than of DRPs identified without the help of CDSS (29% vs 55%; P<.01). The two most prevalent DRP types were "Overtreatment" and "Suboptimal therapy" in both groups. The prevalence of "Overtreatment" was equal in both groups (mean DRPs per patient: 0.84 vs 0.77; P=.22), and "Suboptimal therapy" was more frequently identified post-CDSS (mean DRPs per patient: 0.54 vs 1.1; P<.01). The introduction of CDSS to medication review software generated additional DRPs with a lower resolution rate. Structural assessment including a patient interview elicited the most relevant DRPs. Further development of CDSS with more specific alerts is needed to be clinical relevant.

Number of medications or number of diseases: what influences underprescribing?

An increasing number of older adults suffer from multimorbidity and receive multiple medications. Despite that, underprescribing of potentially beneficial medications is widespread in this population. Our aim was to examine influence of polypharmacy and multimorbidity on the presence of prescribing omissions (PO) in general practice attenders. We conducted a cross-sectional study of older adults attending general practices in Slovenia who were regularly prescribed at least one medication. Patients' data was entered into a computer application evaluating the presence of START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria for PO. Demographic data, CIRS-G (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for geriatric patients) questionnaire, number of medications, and healthcare utilization data were also collected. We defined polypharmacy as five or more concurrent medications. Five hundred three patients were enrolled, 258 (56.7%) female. The average age was 74.9 and average value of CIRS-G index 1.48 (±0.6). Patients took on average 5.6 medications and 216 (42.9%) patients had at least one PO according to START criteria. In bivariate analysis, there was a significant association between age, number of medications, polypharmacy and CIRS-G index measures, and presence of PO. In multivariate analysis, only age and number of affected CIRS-G categories significantly predicted PO (p<0.05). Older patients with more affected CIRS-G categories were at higher risk for PO. Polypharmacy was not an independent risk factor for the presence of PO. A possible reason is that in multimorbid older people, physicians and patients set individual priorities to treatment instead of treating all diseases and conditions.

Potentially inappropriate medications in a sample of Portuguese nursing home residents: Does the choice of screening tools matter?

Background Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are often found in high proportion among the elderly population. The STOPP criteria have been suggested to detect more PIMs in European elderly than the Beers criteria. Objective This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PIMs and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) in a sample of Portuguese nursing homes residents. Setting Four elderly facilities in mainland Portugal Method A descriptive cross-sectional study was used. Elderly polypharmacy patients were included in the study and their medication (registered in patient clinical records) analysed using the Beers (2012 original version and 2008 version adapted to Portugal), STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria. Data were analysed using univariate and bivariate descriptive statistics, considering a confidence interval of 95%. Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs. Results The sample included 161 individuals, with a mean age of 84.7years (SD=6.35), 68.9% being female. A total of 807 PIMs and 90 PPOs were identified through the application of the three set of criteria. The prevalence of PIMs using the most recent version of the Beers criteria was 85.1 and 42.1% for independent and dependent of diagnosis, respectively. The Portuguese adaptation of this same tool indicated a lower prevalence of PIMs, 60.3 and 16.7%, respectively. The prevalence of PIMs using the STOPP criteria was 75.4%, whilst the prevalence of PPOs, using START, was 42.9%. There were significant differences in the mean number of PIMs detected depending on the tool used. (p<0.001). Conclusions The application of the studied criteria in an elderly sample enabled the identification of a notable amount of PIMs and PPOs, indicating there is room for improving the quality of care. The variation in prevalence indicates careful choice of the tool is a prerequisite for engaging in medication review. Using START/STOPP criteria enabled a more holistic approach to the quality of prescribing in the elderly, highlighting low levels of cardiovascular risk prevention and abuse of psychotropic drugs, aside with system failures largely preventable by electronic prescribing and alert generation.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP and START and adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people: a prospective cohort study.

This study aims to determine if potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with increased healthcare utilization, functional decline and reduced quality of life (QoL) in a community-dwelling older cohort. This prospective cohort study included participants aged ≥65 years from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) with linked administrative pharmacy claims data who were followed up after 2years. PIP was defined by the Screening Tool for Older Persons Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START). The association with number of emergency department (ED) visits and GP visits reported over 12 months was analyzed using multivariate negative binomial regression adjusting for confounders. Marginal structural models investigated the presence of time-dependent confounding. Of participants followed up (n=1753), PIP was detected in 57% by STOPP and 41.8% by START, 21.7% reported an ED visit and 96.1% visited a GP (median 4, IQR 2.5-6). Those with any STOPP criterion had higher rates of ED visits (adjusted incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02, 1.66) and GP visits (IRR 1.15, 95%CI 1.06, 1.24). Patients with two or more START criteria had significantly more ED visits (IRR 1.45, 95%CI 1.03, 2.04) and GP visits (IRR 1.13, 95%CI 1.01, 1.27) than people with no criteria. Adjusting for time-dependent confounding did not affect the findings. Both STOPP and START were independently associated with increased healthcare utilization and START was also related to functional decline and QoL. Optimizing prescribing to reduce PIP may provide an improvement in patient outcomes.

Optimizing elderly pharmacotherapy: polypharmacy vs. undertreatment. Are these two concepts related?

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of polypharmacy and potential prescribing omissions (PPO) and their related factors in community-dwelling elderly patients and to examine any possible relationship between these two concepts. A cross-sectional study was carried out including patients 65 years of age or over living on the island of Lanzarote (Spain). Sociodemographic, clinical and functional variables were collected, together with full data on drug therapy. The percentage of patients receiving ≥5 medications (polypharmacy) and the percentage of patients receiving at least one PPO according to Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria (underprescription) were the two primary endpoints. A total of 1844 medications were prescribed to the 407 patients included in our study. The overall prevalence of polypharmacy was 45 %. The risk factors associated with polypharmacy were comorbidity (OR 1.98, 95 % CI 1.63-2.44), limitations in activities of daily living (ADL; OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.51-6.11), and being prescribed a drug in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification (ATC) C group (OR 7.92, 95 % CI 4.10-16.25) or in the N group (OR 3.80, 95 % CI 2.25-6.55). START criteria identified a total of 303 PPO in 170 (41.8 %) subjects. The risk of PPO increased by 60 % for every additional point in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.35-1.91). Polypharmacy also independently predicted the odds of at least one PPO according to START criteria (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.36-3.55). Our findings show high rates of polypharmacy and PPO, as well as a clear relationship between these two concepts.

Views of general practitioners on the use of STOPP&START in primary care: a qualitative study

Background and objective:STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment) criteria aim at detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people. The objective was to explore general practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions regarding the use of the STOPP&START tool in their practice.Design:We conducted three focus groups which were conveniently sampled. Vignettes with clinical cases were provided for discussion as well as a full version of the STOPP&START tool. Knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of the tool and its implementation were discussed. Two researchers independently performed content analysis, classifying quotes and creating new categories for emerging themes.Results:Discussions highlighted incentives (e.g. systematic procedure for medication review) and barriers (e.g. time-consuming application) influencing the use of STOPP&START in primary care. Usefulness, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the tool were also questioned. Another important category emerging from the content analysis was the projected use of the tool. The GPs imagined key elements for the implementation in daily practice: computerized clinical decision support system, education, and multidisciplinary collaborations, especially at care transitions and in nursing homes.Conclusion:Despite variables views on the usefulness, comprehensiveness, and relevance of STOPP&START, GPs suggest the implementation of this tool in primary care within computerized clinical decision support systems, through education, and used as part of multidisciplinary collaborations.

Inappropriate prescribing according to the STOPP/START criteria in older people from a primary care setting

Background: STOPP (screening tool of older persons’ prescriptions)/START (screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment) criteria aim to identify potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) due to mis-, over- and under-prescription in older patients. Initially developed by Irish experts, their applicability has been demonstrated in primary health care (PHC).Objective: To quantify and identify the most frequent PIM at PHC level using STOPP/START criteria. To identify factors that may modulate the onset of PIM.Methods: Audit of a random sample of 272 electronic health records (including prescription, diagnosis and laboratory results) of patients ≥ 65 years old, with at least one prescription in the last three months, from a PHC setting in the Vigo Health Authority (Spain). Original STOPP/START criteria were used, as well as a version adapted to Spanish PHC. Descriptive statistics and generalized linear models were applied.Results: The median number of medicines per patient was 5 (inter-quartile range: 3–7). The prevalence of PIM identified by the STOPP criteria was 37.5% and 50.7%, with the original criteria and the Spanish version, respectively. Using both versions of the START tool, the prevalence of under-prescription was 45.9% and 43.0%, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the number of STOPP PIM and number of prescriptions, and between the number of START PIM with Charlson comorbidity index and number of prescriptions. Of 87 criteria, 20 accounted for 80% of PIM.Conclusion: According to STOPP/START criteria, there is a high level of PIM in PHC setting. To prevent PIM occurring, action must be taken.

An inter-rater reliability study of the prescribing indicated medications quality indicators of the Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) 3 criteria as a potentially inappropriate prescribing tool

PurposeThere are limited tools to assess potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) or underprescribing in the elderly. The ACOVE project defines comprehensive quality care indicators for older people and some of these indicators focused on appropriate use of medicines. The aim of the present study was to assess the inter-rater reliability between observers using the ACOVE 3 prescribing indicated medications indicators and compare it with the inter-rater reliability obtained for the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria. MethodsIn the context of an observational and multicentric study of a cohort of 672 patients 75 years and older who were hospitalized in Internal Medicine services of seven Spanish hospitals, an inter-rater reliability study using the ACOVE selected indicators and the STOPP/START criteria was carried out between April 2011 and March 2012. Three patients were randomly selected in each participating hospital, one for each four months of study. ResultsA total of 21 patients (mean (SD) age of 84.3 (5.6) years, 57.1% female) were included in the inter-rater reliability study. For the STOPP, START and ACOVE criteria, the median kappa coefficient for the seven hospital analyses was 0.97, 0.92 and 0.95, respectively. Out of 123 total indicators in only 7 (5.7%) was the kappa coefficient value below 0.75. Only for 2 (5.6%) of the 37 studies selected ACOVE quality indicators was the kappa coefficient value less than 0.75. ConclusionsA high inter-rater reliability was obtained for the selected underprescribing quality indicators of ACOVE 3. These quality indicators may be considered a useful tool in detecting underprescribing to the elderly patients.

Use of STOPP/ START Criteria to Perform Active Pharmacovigilance in the Elderly

Background: Inappropriate prescription of drugs is common in the elderly and contributes to an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Several tools have been developed to detect potentially inappropriate prescription but the STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria resulted better than others to identify medicines that lead to negative outcomes. The purpose of this work was to study the prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medicines and Potential Prescribing Omissions in Uruguayan hospitalized elderly patients using these criteria. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in different Services of the University Hospital. STOPP and START criteria were applied to identify inappropriate medicines or omissions. Results: Potentially Inappropriate medicines identified by STOPP represent 21.2% of the total prescriptions (862) and Potential Prescribing Omissions identified by START account for the 5.7%. Conclusions: Using STOPP-START criteria could be a useful tool to improve prescription in the elderly and can contribute to the rational use of medicines in this age group.

Inappropriate Prescribing as a Predictor for Long-Term Mortality after Hip Fracture

Background: Hip fracture patients are at a higher risk for death compared to age-matched controls. While the reasons for this increased mortality risk are incompletely understood, medical comorbidities and associated medication prescribing likely play an important role in patient outcomes. Altered drug metabolism, polypharmacy and diminished physiologic reserve may all lead to adverse drug reactions and adverse outcomes. Additionally, underprescribing of efficacious medications may deprive older patients of potential therapeutic benefits. Objective: The aim of our trial was to estimate the impact of inappropriate medication prescribing on the long-term outcome of older hip fracture patients. Methods: The present study is a retrospective cohort study. We included all hip fracture patients who were consecutively admitted to our department from 2000 to 2004. We used the previously published STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria to assess the appropriateness of medication prescribing with an additional focus on osteoporosis medications and the total number of prescriptions. Prescriptions meeting STOPP and START criteria were considered ‘positive items' and correlated with outcomes. Mortality was assessed by cross-referencing with the national death registry of the Tyrolean Institute of Epidemiology. Results: During the study period, a total of 457 patients with hip fracture (mean age 80.61 ± 7.07 years; range 65-98) were evaluated. The mean number of positive combined STOPP and START items per patient was 2 ± 1.3, with ranges from 0 to 6 (STOPP items), 0 to 4 (START items) and 0 to 7 (combined STOPP/START items). Only 44 (9.6%) of patients had no positive STOPP or START items. The mean number of positive items (STOPP, START and combined) was significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors. The all-cause mortality rate at 3 years was lowest in the subjects with 1 or 0 positive items (20.5%; n = 35) and highest among those with >3 positive items (44.4%; n = 63). Inappropriate medication prescribing remained an independent risk factor with an odds ratio of 1.28 (1.07-1.52) after adjustment for sex, age, activities of daily living, comorbidities and nutrition status. Conclusion: Inappropriate medication prescribing is an independent predictor of long-term mortality in older hip fracture patients. It increases the relative risk of mortality in older hip fracture patients by 28%.

Inappropriate Prescribing and Related Hospital Admissions in Frail Older Persons According to the STOPP and START Criteria

Over the last few years, the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria have been increasingly used to evaluate the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing. However, very few studies have evaluated the link between these criteria and clinical outcomes. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP and START in a population of frail elderly persons admitted acutely to hospital; to evaluate whether these inappropriate prescribing events contributed to hospital admissions; and to identify determinants of hospital admissions potentially related to inappropriate prescribing. This was a cross-sectional study including all frail older patients admitted to a 975-bed teaching hospital over a 12-month period. A pharmacist and a geriatrician independently detected events of prescribing of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and potential prescribing omission (PPO), using the STOPP and START criteria, respectively, in all patients included in the study. They determined whether the inappropriate prescribing event was the main cause or a contributory cause of hospital admission. Demographic, clinical and geriatric clinical syndromes (i.e. cognitive impairment, falls) were evaluated as potential determinants of hospital admissions related to inappropriate prescribing, using multivariate methods (i.e. logistic regression and a classification tree). 302 frail older persons (median age 84 years) were included in the study. PIMs (prevalence 48%) mainly involved overuse and/or misuse of benzodiazepines, aspirin and opiates. PPOs (prevalence 63%) were mainly related to underuse of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, aspirin and statins. Overall, inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP (54 PIMs) and/or START (38 PPOs) led or contributed to hospital admission in 82 persons (27%). The multivariate analyses indicated a relation between PIM-related admissions and a history of previous falls (p < 0.001), while the PPO-related admissions were associated with a history of osteoporotic fracture (p < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.004). Using the STOPP and START criteria, it was found that inappropriate prescribing events (both PIMs and PPOs) were frequent and were associated with a substantial number of acute hospital admissions in frail older persons. Fall-induced osteoporotic fracture was the most important cause of hospital admission related to inappropriate prescribing and should be a priority for pharmacological optimization approaches.

Underprescription of Beneficial Medicines in Older People

Underprescription of potentially useful drugs is widespread among older people and may herald several adverse outcomes. We aimed to review the evidence pertaining to the epidemiology, causes and consequences of underprescribing, as well as recent advances in the development of interventions able to reduce underprescribing and improve outcomes in older people. Underprescribing is highly prevalent across different settings, including in the community, hospitals and nursing homes. Multimorbidity, polypharmacy, ageism, lack of scientific evidence, fear of adverse events and economic problems may contribute to the underprescription of indicated drugs, although in some patients, a limited life expectancy, the lack of a favourable risk-to-benefit ratio or a patient's refusal might represent appropriate reasons not to prescribe a drug. Selected interventions may help to improve the quality of prescriptions and reduce the burden of underprescribing. Among these, comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been demonstrated to effectively improve prescribing practice. Interventions based on service delivery changes, such as those that include a clinical pharmacist or a case manager in the process of care, were also found to improve the quality of pharmacological prescriptions. Educational interventions may also be effective in reducing underprescribing. More recently, the clinical application of the Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria has been able to significantly reduce underprescribing. Since START criteria are easier to apply in clinical practice than other instruments, it is conceivable that their systematic use may contribute to reducing underprescribing and to improving health outcomes in older patients.

STOPP and START screening tools as supplements to the pharmaceutical medicines review

BackgroundInappropriate prescribing is a well-documented problem in older people. The screening tools STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Peoples' Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) have...

Assessment of inappropriate drug prescription in older people through a screening tool

BackgroundComorbidity and polypharmacy in conjunction with physiological changes in older people contribute to the well-documented problem of inappropriate drug prescription, a risk associated with an age group.PurposeTo find out to...

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in an Irish elderly population in primary care

* Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people is a well-documented problem and has been associated with adverse drug reactions and hospitalization. * Beers' criteria, Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) are screening tools that have been formulated to help physicians and pharmacists identify potentially inappropriate prescribing and potential prescribing omissions. * The prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing and prescribing omissions in the elderly population presenting to hospital with acute illness is high according to STOPP and START criteria. * Potential errors of prescribing and of omission of medicines are prevalent among medically stable older people in primary care. * Screening tools should be incorporated into the everyday practice of primary care doctors and community pharmacists as a means of preventing potential errors of prescribing commission and prescribing omission in older people. Screening tools have been formulated to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (IP) in older people. Beers' criteria are the most widely used but have disadvantages when used in Europe. New IP screening tools called Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) and Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) have been developed to identify potential IP and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). The aim was to measure the prevalence rates of potential IP and PPOs in primary care using Beers' criteria, STOPP and START. Case records of 1329 patients >or=65 years old from three general practices in one region of southern Ireland were studied. The mean age +/- SD of the patients was 74.9 +/- 6.4 years, 60.9% were female. Patients' current diagnoses and prescription medicines were reviewed and the Beers' criteria, STOPP and START tools applied. The total number of medicines prescribed was 6684; median number of medicines per patient was five (range 1-19). Overall, Beers' criteria identified 286 potentially inappropriate prescriptions in 18.3% (243) of patients, whilst the corresponding IP rate identified by STOPP was 21.4% (284), in respect of 346 potentially inappropriate prescriptions. A total of 333 PPOs were identified in 22.7% (302) of patients using the START tool. Potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and errors of drug omission are highly prevalent among older people living in the community. Prevention strategies should involve primary care doctors and community pharmacists.