Screening Tool For Sleep Apnea Research Articles

A Novel Screening Tool for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Purpose: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition with long waiting lists for the gold standard polysomnography (PSG) test. Screening tests are essential to identify and prioritize patients with severe OSA. Current questionnaires do not accurately detect severe cases. This study aims to develop an alternative screening tool based on anthropometric and morphological characteristics to determine the severity of OSA. Methods: The study included 149 patients with sleep apnea symptoms who did not have additional diseases. The obstructive sleep apnea morphologic scale (OSAMS) was created using 5 parameters: 3 internal parameters related to the upper respiratory tract (tonsil size, oropharyngeal passage, and hypopharyngeal-laryngeal examination) and 2 external parameters (neck circumference and body mass index). Each parameter was scored, and the total scores were correlated with the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of PSG to determine the severity of OSA. Results: A statistically significant moderate positive correlation was found between AHI and OSAMS scores (rho = .491; P < .001). A grand total score >4 provided 80.3% sensitivity and 53.9% specificity to identify patients with severe OSA. OSAMS demonstrated superior results compared to existing questionnaires for OSA screening in our study group. Conclusions: OSAMS is a potential alternative to existing questionnaires to screen patients with severe OSA, offering a practical approach based on morphology during physical examinations.

Public engagement with consumer sleep technology for obstructive sleep apnea screening: implications for equity, access, and practice.

To characterize public practices and perspectives on the use of consumer sleep technology (CST) and evaluate perspectives on using CST as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We designed a survey instrument incorporating content from validated instruments (STOP-BANG and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and hypothesis-generated questions. Survey development involved multidisciplinary collaboration among three board-certified sleep medicine experts, researchers, and consumers. The survey was disseminated across a national sample of adults living in the United States via an online platform. Among 897 respondents, the mean (SD) age was 47.5 (16.9) years; 73.1% were female, 81.8% were White, and 505 respondents (56.3%) reported having tracked sleep using CS. Factors associated with decreased odds of CST use included household income <$30,000 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.79; p=0.004), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.001), Medicare insurance (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p=0.004), and lack of a primary care physician (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91; p=0.021). Most respondents (91.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that screening for OSA would be a useful feature of CST, but respondents reporting an education of high school diploma or less (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79; p=0.004) were less likely to agree with this statement. Attitudes toward and use of CST differed based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Further study is needed to understand and address barriers to CST adoption and to characterize implications for equitable access to care for sleep disorders.

Validation of the European Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening (EUROSAS) in Professional Male Drivers

(1) Background: The European Union Driver License Committee recently developed a questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), named the European Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening (EUROSAS) questionnaire for drivers. The aim of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of the EUROSAS to predict risk of OSA in professional male drivers. (2) Methods: Fifty-eight drivers were included in the current study. All participants were asked to fill out the EUROSAS before an overnight polysomnography (PSG) in the hospital. OSA was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 5 events/hour on the PSG. (3) Results: Out of 58 participants, the EUROSAS correctly identified 39 (67.2%) cases as having high-risk OSA and one patient as having low-risk OSA, using AHI ≥ 5 events/h. The results indicated that the EUROSAS has a sensitivity of 67.2%, a specificity of 33.3%, a positive predictive value of 94.8%, and a negative predictive value of 5.2%. Similar results were obtained using AHI cut-offs of 15 and 30 events/h. (4) Conclusions: The EUROSAS provides a moderate level of accuracy for the screening of OSA in the professional male drivers. It seems that the diagnostic performance of the EUROSAS is not promising as an alternative questionnaire to identify professional drivers with OSA, probably due to participant response bias. Despite its limited evidence, the EUROSAS might have potential as a clinical screening tool in the general population.

STOP-Bang questionnaire in patients hospitalized with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We conducted this study to validate it among patients hospitalized with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive stable patients with acute PE who underwent an overnight sleep study within 7 days after diagnosis. Our outcomes were: i) the STOP-Bang questionnaire's utility for risk stratification, ii) the discrimination of the STOP-Bang questionnaire categories, iii) the false negative rate of STOP-Bang questionnaire prediction, and iv) the clinical utility of the STOP-Bang questionnaire to exclude OSA. We also calculated the test performance characteristics to predict OSA. During the study period, 268 patients completed a sleep study. OSA was found in 47% of patients. OSA incidence in low-, moderate-, and high-risk STOP-Bang groups was 22.4%, 48.2%, and 61.5%, respectively (P <0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for risk of OSA was 0.65. The false negative rate of a low-risk STOP-Bang questionnaire result to rule out OSA was 22.4% and the clinical utility was 21.6%. The sensitivity was 89.8% (97.2% for men and 80.4% for women). The STOP-Bang questionnaire showed poor discrimination for the risk of OSA in hospitalized patients with acute symptomatic PE. It had a high false negative rate and a low clinical utility. The STOP-Bang questionnaire had a good sensitivity in men, and might be used to rule out OSA in this population.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening and Effects of Surgery in Acromegaly: A Prospective Study.

To identify a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and evaluate the effects of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery on improving OSA in patients with acromegaly. We prospectively enrolled adults with acromegaly scheduled for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. All measurements were conducted when participants were admitted for a baseline work-up for acromegaly before surgery and surveillance approximately 3 to 6 months after surgery. Respiratory event index (REI) was used as a surrogate for apnea-hypopnea index (Trial Registration: NCT03526016). Of the 35 patients with acromegaly (median age, 47 years; 40% men; median body mass index, 24.4 kg/m2), 24 (68.6%) had OSA (REI ≥5/hour), 15 (42.9%) had moderate-to-severe OSA (REI ≥15/hour). At baseline, serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels were positively correlated with the REI (ρ=0.53, P=0.001). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of a Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apnea, high blood Pressure-Body mass index, age, Neck circumference, and Gender (STOP-Bang) score ≥ 3 were 93.3% and 87.5%, respectively, detecting moderate-to-severe OSA. Biochemical acromegaly remission was achieved in 32 (91.4%) patients. The median difference in the REI was -9.5/hour (95% confidence interval, -13.3 to -5.3). Half of the 24 patients diagnosed with OSA preoperatively had REI <5/hour postoperatively. In a linear mixed-effects model, changes in the REI across surgery were related to changes in IGF-1 levels. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a reliable tool for OSA among patients with acromegaly. Improvement in OSA severity after surgery is related to decreased IGF-1 levels.

Sleep studies in obese children with obstructive sleep apnea: Pulse oximetry as a diagnostic tool.

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with many co-morbidities in children and young people. Obesity has long been recognised as an important risk factor associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Currently, polysomnography is regarded as the gold-standard diagnostic tool for obstructive sleep apnea. The validity of oximetry as a screening and diagnostic tool for obstructive sleep apnea has been the subject of several studies in the literature. There is little published evidence on the use of oximetry in children with obesity. This study assesses whether oximetry is a reliable diagnostic tool for obstructive sleep apnea in obese children. We reviewed the medical records of obese children with a suspected diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea who underwent oximetry and cardiorespiratory polygraphy or full polysomnography at Sheffield Children's Hospital between January 2010 and March 2022. We compared oximetry results with the apnea-hypopnea index from cardiorespiratory polygraphy or full polysomnography for each patient. A total of 60 patient records were included in the analysis. The sensitivity of oximetry in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea was 70.9%, with a specificity of 65.5% and a positive predictive value of 68.75%. In the subgroup of subjects with severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > 10), oximetry had a sensitivity of 87.5%. We concluded that oximetry could be a helpful initial diagnostic tool for obstructive sleep apnea in obese children, but is not entirely reliable. A negative oximetry result in a symptomatic individual should prompt a referral for more detailed investigations, while a positive result can help in treatment decisions without needing a polysomnography.

Validity of Modified STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of a modified STOP-Bang questionnaire with different body mass index reference as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in Korean population. The medical records of 1417 participants who underwent overnight Level I polysomnography were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive parameters were calculated for each of the 3 groups classified by obstructive sleep apnea severity with a cut-off value of 3 or 4. Responses to modified and traditional questionnaires were comparatively analyzed by receiver-operator characteristic curves and area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves. The optimal cut-off values of the modified and traditional questionnaires were both 3.5. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of modified STOP-Bang questionnaire for any obstructive sleep apnea group was 0.786 ± 0.018, which was significantly higher than that of the traditional questionnaire. The modified STOP-Bang questionnaire with a cut-off value ≥4 showed significantly higher sensitivity than the traditional one for any obstructive sleep apnea group. The diagnostic accuracy of the modified questionnaire was also significantly higher for the any obstructive sleep apnea group when the cut-off value was 4. The modified STOP-Bang questionnaire, with a cut-off value of 4, can be used as an alternative to the traditional screening tool for the Korean population.

RUSleeping® device associated with StopBang Questionnaire shows high sensitivity and accuracy as a screening tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing bariatric surgery

RUSleeping® device associated with StopBang Questionnaire shows high sensitivity and accuracy as a screening tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing bariatric surgery

A New Screening Tool (BAMSA) for Sleep Apnea in Male Professional Truck Drivers.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in professional truck drivers. It is important that OSA is recognized since undiagnosed and/or untreated sleep apnea is a risk factor for sleepiness-related traffic accidents. In this study, we developed a new simple tool to screen for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in this population. Altogether, 2066 professional truck drivers received a structured questionnaire. A total of 175 drivers had a clinical examination and were invited to participate in sleep laboratory studies, including cardiorespiratory polygraphy. We studied associations of different risk factors with the presence of sleep apnea. We established a new simple screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that was compared to other existing screening tools. A total of 1095 drivers completed the questionnaire. Successful cardiorespiratory polygraphy was obtained for 172 drivers. Full data were available for 160 male drivers included in the analyses. The following five risk factors for sleep apnea formed the BAMSA score (0 to 5): BMI > 30 kgm-2, age > 50 years, male gender, snoring at least one night per week, and the presence of apnea at least sometimes. BAMSA showed a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 78.8% in detecting AHI ≥ 15 when using a cut-off point of 4, and the ROC area was 0.823. BAMSA is a sensitive and easy-to-use tool in predicting obstructive sleep apnea in male professional drivers.

Efeitos tardios do uso de cafeína no sono de crianças nascidas prematuras

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether the therapeutic use of caffeine for premature newborns is associated with changes in sleep habits and the presence of obstructive sleep apnea in childhood. Methods: This is a cross-sectional single-center study in which the caretakers of 87 children aged 5–10 years, born full-term or preterm, treated or not with caffeine in the neonatal period, answered questionnaires to screen for obstructive sleep apnea (Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Tool [PosaST]) and to characterize the sleep habits (Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire [CSHQ]) of their children. ANOVA and linear regression tests were performed to verify possible differences between the groups. Results: Children born prematurely who were treated with caffeine woke up significantly later on weekdays than those born at term (09h±00h58 and 07h43±1h15, respectively, p=0.022) and had longer total daily sleep time also compared to those born at term (10h24±1h08 and 09h29±1h08, respectively, p&lt;0.001). There was no significant difference between the three groups in overall PosaST and CSHQ scores. Conclusions: Caffeine use in the neonatal period did not impair sleep habits later in life and did not lead to increased obstructive sleep apnea scores in prematurely born children compared to those born at term.

Sleep habits and orofacial myofunctional self-assessment of children at risk for sleep breathing disorders.

To identify orofacial myofunctional complaints and sleep-disordered breathing and correlate them with sleep habits in childhood. The study included 71 parents/guardians of public school children aged 6 to 11 years. They answered a form with semi-structured medical history questions and the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening - interview, the Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Tool Questionnaire, and the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire - all of them in their Portuguese/Brazilian versions in an online format. Statistical analyses used Spearman's correlation, setting the significance level at 5%. There were 29 female children (40.8%) and 42 male ones (59.2%), with a mean age of 8.52 years. The study found orofacial myofunctional complaints related to breathing functions (35.2%), chewing and swallowing (32.4%), and deleterious habits (33.8%). All children were at a low risk of sleep-disordered breathing. As for sleep habits, 23 children (32.39%) had a lower total score, whereas 48 children (67.61%) exceeded 41 points. There was a correlation between the risk of sleep-disordered breathing in children with complaints of orofacial myofunctional disorders and poor sleep quality/habits.

Usability and accuracy of polygraphy devices as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in an atrial fibrillation population

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): This study is part of Limburg Clinical Research Center, supported by the foundation Limburg Sterk Merk, province of Limburg, Flemish government, Hasselt University, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg and Jessa Hospital. Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an important modifiable risk factor in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, it is underdiagnosed in daily clinical practice, although up to 62% of AF patients may have OSA. Early detection of OSA is essential for rhythm control in AF patients. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosing OSA is polysomnography (PSG), but besides being an expensive method, it also requires a supervised hospitalization of one night. There is a lack of accurate and easy-to-use tools to test for OSA that can be implemented in daily ambulatory care. Purpose This study examined the accuracy and user-friendliness of several (cardiorespiratory) polygraphy devices (PG) as a simple screening tool for OSA in an outpatient AF population. Methods This prospective cohort study determines the accuracy of 4 PGs [ApneaLink Air (ALA), SOMNOtouch RESP (STR), SpiderSAS (SpS), and Noxturnal T3 (Nox-T3)] in AF patients who underwent a PSG evaluation at two Belgian sleep clinics. All the patients were instructed and asked to use a PG for one night at home. The Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was used to identify if moderate to severe OSA was present, i.e. AHI ≥15. Moreover, specific AHI cut-off values for each PG were derived based on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (best Youden's J Index and an accuracy of more than 0.7 compared to PSG). In addition, patients completed a Comfort Questionnaire (CQ) in order to assess the PG’s user-friendliness. Results In total, 130 AF patients undergoing a PSG were included (100 who tested the three devices ALA, STR, SpS and 30 patients who only tested Nox-T3). Only the successful measurements (i.e. ≥4 hours of data on automated analysis; n=250, 75.8%) were examined. The success rate for the ALA, STR, SpS, and NOX-T3 devices was 72.0%, 73.0%, 79.0% and 86.7%, respectively. The optimal AHI cut-off value for each PG in screening for clinically relevant OSA (i.e. AHI ≥15 on PSG) was 7.0, 10.0, 19.5, and 11.1 for the ALA, STR, SpS, and Nox-T3, respectively. The Nox-T3 PG had the highest sensitivity (92.9%), specificity (75.0%) and accuracy (0.85) in comparison to the other three PGs (Table 1). In addition, the scores of three important questions of the CQ were higher for the patients with Nox-T3 compared to the other PGs (Table 2). Conclusion Our results demonstrate the usability of PGs as early OSA screening tools in AF patients. The Nox-T3 with an optimized AHI cut-off value of 11.1 seems to be the best option for ambulatory OSA screening, based both on accuracy and user-friendliness.

Contactless screening for sleep apnea with breathing vibration signals based on modified U-Net

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic sleep disorder characterized by frequent cessations or reductions of breathing during sleep. Polysomnography (PSG) is a definitive diagnostic tool for OSA. The costly and obtrusive nature of PSG and poor access to sleep clinics have created a demand for accurate home-based screening devices. MethodsThis paper proposes a novel OSA screening method based solely on breathing vibration signals with a modified U-Net, allowing patients to be tested at home. Sleep recordings over a whole night are collected in a contactless manner, and sleep apnea-hypopnea events are labeled by a deep neural network. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) calculated from events estimation is then used to screen for the apnea. The performance of the model is tested by event-based analysis and comparing the estimated AHI with the manually obtained values. ResultsThe accuracy and sensitivity of sleep apnea events detection are 97.5% and 76.4%, respectively. The mean absolute error of AHI estimation for the patients is 3.0 events/hour. The correlation between the ground truth AHI and predicted AHI shows an R2 of 0.95. In addition, 88.9% of all participants are classified into correct AHI categories. ConclusionsThe proposed scheme has great potential as a simple screening tool for sleep apnea. It can accurately detect potential OSA and help the patients to be referred for differential diagnosis of home sleep apnea test (HSAT) or polysomnographic evaluation.

Sleep Subdomain of the Sinonasal Outcome Test as a Potential Screening Tool for Sleep Apnea in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Approximately 20% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have comorbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Patients with undiagnosed OSA are at high risk for perioperative complications. The Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) Questionnaire is commonly administered to CRS patients, whereas OSA screening tools are less routinely employed. This study compared SNOT-22 sleep subdomain (Sleep-SNOT) scores among non-OSA CRS versus OSA-CRS patients undergoing ESS, and assessed sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the Sleep-SNOT for OSA screening. Retrospective review of patients that underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS from 2012 to 2021. Patients either carried a reported OSA diagnosis and completed the SNOT-22, or had undocumented OSA status and completed both STOP-BANG and SNOT-22. Demographics, questionnaire scores, and OSA status were collected. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessed cutoff scores, sensitivity, and specificity of the Sleep-SNOT for OSA screening. Of 600 patients reviewed, 109 were included. 41% had comorbid OSA. OSA patients had a higher BMI (32.1 ± 7.7 vs. 28.35 ± 6.7 kg/m2 ; p = 0.02), Sleep-SNOT (21.96 ± 12.1 vs. 16.8 ± 11.2; p = 0.021) and STOP-BANG (3.1 ± 1.44 vs. 2.06 ± 1.27; p = 0.038) scores. A Sleep-SNOT score of 17.5 had a sensitivity of 68.9%, specificity of 55.7%, and diagnostic accuracy of 63% for OSA detection (p = 0.022). Sleep-SNOT scores are greater for CRS-OSA patients. The Sleep-SNOT ROC curve demonstrates a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for OSA screening in CRS patients. A Sleep-SNOT score of ≥17.5 should prompt further OSA evaluation. The Sleep-SNOT may be considered as a surrogate OSA screening tool when other validated tools are not employed. Retrospective chart review, Level 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2029-2034, 2023.

Utilization of the GOAL questionnaire as a standardized screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the application value of the GOAL questionnaire in screening obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to compare it with the other three questionnaires in sleep clinics. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 436 patients who had undergone nocturnal polysomnography in the sleep unit of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between September 2021 and May 2022, and all patients completed the four questionnaires (GOAL questionnaire, STOP-Bang questionnaire, NoSAS score and No-Apnea score) truthfully, and the patients were divided into 3 groups: AHI ≥ 5 events/h group, AHI ≥ 15 events/h group and AHI ≥ 30 events/h group. The predictive effect of the questionnaire on different AHI cut-off values was calculated, and performance of four questionnaires was assessed by the discriminatory ability. This study ultimately included 410 patients, and there were statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMI, neck circumference, clinical symptoms, hypertension, diabetes, AHI, and minimum oxygen saturation between OSA and non-OSA groups (P < 0.05). The AUC for No-Apnea score was 0.79, the AUC for STOP-Bang questionnaire was 0.86, the AUC for NoSAS score was 0.81, and the AUC for GOAL questionnaire was 0.77. These four questionnaires were effective in screening OSA when AHI ≥ 15 events/h. Similar to No-Apnea score, STOP-Bang score and NoSAS score, GOAL questionnaire has a good predictive value for OSA, which is a questionnaire suitable for primary health-care centers and clinics.

Simple Novel Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with an increased risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We aimed to examine the associations of obstructive sleep apnea, sleepiness, and IBD-related data and comorbidities, with the aim of developing a screening tool for sleep apnea in this population. An online survey of adults with IBD was administered which included measures of assessment of the risk of OSA, and measures of IBD activity, IBD-related disability, anxiety, and depression. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the associations between the risk of OSA and IBD data, medications, demographics, and mental health conditions. Further models were built for an outcome of severe daytime sleepiness and a combined outcome of risk of OSA and at least mild daytime sleepiness. A simple score was constructed for the purpose of screening for OSA. There were 670 responses to the online questionnaire. The median age was 41 years, the majority had Crohn's disease (57%), the median disease duration was 11.9 years, and approximately half were on biologics (50.5%). Moderate-high risk of OSA was demonstrated in 22.6% of the cohort. A multivariate regression model for moderate-high risk of OSA included increasing age, obesity, smoking, and abdominal pain subscore. For a combined outcome of moderate-high risk of OSA and at least mild daytime sleepiness, a multivariate model included abdominal pain, age, smoking, obesity, and clinically significant depression. A simple score was constructed for screening for OSA utilizing age, obesity, IBD activity, and smoking status with an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.77. A score >2 had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 56% for moderate-high risk of OSA and could be utilized for screening for OSA in the IBD clinic. Over one-fifth of an IBD cohort met significantly high-risk criteria for OSA to warrant referral for a diagnostic sleep study. The risk of OSA was associated with abdominal pain, along with more traditional risk factors such as smoking, increasing age, and obesity. Consideration should be given for screening for OSA in IBD patients utilizing a novel screening tool that utilizes parameters typically available in IBD clinic.

Stop-bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnoea in the surgical population: a prospective observational study

Introduction and Aim: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a type of sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by repetitive episodes of partial and complete pharyngeal collapse causing a reduction or total cessation of airflow during sleep. Undiagnosed, it increases the intraoperative and postoperative complications. This study aimed to screen patients undergoing surgical procedures for OSA using a validated self-report STOP-Bang questionnaire. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital between June and November 2021 and included 174 patients posted for elective surgery. A modified STOP-Bang questionnaire was used to evaluate participants for OSA. Documentation also included the difficulty in mask holding, number of attempts at laryngoscopy and intubation, the type and size of the endotracheal tube, and attempts to place a supraglottic airway device. Results: The prevalence of self-reported OSA was 5.2% (n=9) among the 174 participants included in this study. Among the patients (n=98) who underwent general anaesthesia 32 had difficult airways, among which 20 (62.5%) had a predictor of difficult airway and two had OSA. One among the 2 OSA patients had other predictors of difficult airway. No statistical significance was observed between OSA and the difficult airway (p=0.723). However, a clinically significant association was seen for difficult mask holding for patients with OSA but having no other predictors of difficult airway. Conclusion: Using the STOP-Bang questionnaire to screen OSA in patients undergoing general anaesthesia or sedation can help the anaesthesiologist manage difficult airways more effectively.

Clinical application of a previously validated pregnancy-specific screening tool for sleep apnea in a cohort with a high prevalence of obesity

ObjectiveThe purpose of this project was to determine the positive predictive value of existing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening tools in clinical use, in a real-world clinical population of gravidae, and to explore the development of a new questionnaire for screening for OSA during pregnancy. MethodsPregnant people were administered sleep screening questionnaires as part of routine clinical care. These included Facco's four variable OSA screening tool, the STOP-BANG, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Those who screened positive were referred for diagnostic sleep testing, typically with a type III home monitoring device. Here we analyzed the screening responses used by those who completed diagnostic testing to determine the positive predictive value of the existing tools. Results159 pregnant people completed diagnostic OSA testing and were included in this analysis. The positive predictive value of Facco's four variable sleep screening tool was 74.3%, STOP-BANG was 75.3%, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was 69.8%. Our sample size was insufficient to create a new screening tool. ConclusionsHere we calculated the positive predictive value of Facco's 4 variable screening tool for screening for OSA in pregnancy in a real-world pregnant population. While we were not able to generate a new screening tool for screening for OSA during pregnancy, both STOP-BANG and Facco's four variable tool had positive predictive values over 70% in our population which was characterized by high BMI and advanced maternal age. Increased clinical use of the pregnancy-specific tool may be warranted.

Usefulness of the Berlin Questionnaire for Screening Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a sleep clinic.Methods: We used a retrospective review of 77 subjects with suspected OSA to conduct a secondary analysis of a previously published sleep study. A total of 77 subjects attended and completed overnight, in-laboratory polysomnography. Subjects completed the standard BQ in the evening just before the sleep study.Results: The mean age of 77 subjects was 49.94±15.78 years, of which 37 (48.1%) were male and 42 (63.7%) were white. Forty-six subjects (59.7%) were diagnosed with OSA through polysomnography. In the analysis of each item of the standard BQ, the sensitivity ranged from 4.6% to 92.5%, and the specificity ranged from 13.3% to 85.7%. For item 8, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 4.6%, 84.9%, 0.3, and 1.1, respectively. The area under the curve values of the standard BQ and after deleting item 8 were 0.634 and 0.751, respectively. When item 8 was deleted and each item on the standard BQ was calculated as one point, the cutoff values representing the highest Yuden index were 3.5 and 4.5.Conclusions: A modified BQ that selects four different questions for each subject, regardless of the number of positive categories in the standard BQ, will provide improved accuracy in screening subjects with a high likelihood of having OSA.

Utility of Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) in Children with Craniofacial Anomalies.

To determine the accuracy of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children with craniofacial anomalies. Retrospective cohort study. Multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial clinic at a tertiary care center. Children with craniofacial anomalies 2 to ≤18 years of age who both completed a PSQ screen and underwent polysomnography (PSG) without interval surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of the PSQ in detecting an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/hour. Fifty children met study criteria, with 66% (n = 33) having an associated syndrome. Mean patient age at time of PSQ was 9.6 + 4.0 years. Overall, 33 (64%) screened positive on the PSQ, while 20 (40%) had an AHI ≥ 5. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying AHI ≥ 5 was 70% and 40%, respectively. With subgroup analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were higher (100% and 50%) in children with non-syndromic palatal clefting but lower (65% and 31%) in children with a syndrome or chromosomal anomaly. There was no correlation detected between PSQ score and AHI severity (p = 0.25). The mean obstructive AHI in the study population was 10.1 ± 22.7 despite 44% (n = 22) undergoing prior adenotonsillectomy. The PSQ was less sensitive and specific in detecting an AHI ≥ 5 in children with craniofacial anomalies than in a general population, and particularly poor in for children with syndrome-associated craniofacial conditions. Given the high prevalence of OSA in this patient population, a craniofacial-specific validated screening tool would be beneficial.