Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Research Articles

Yield and Effectiveness of Two-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Test-based Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality of China account for nearly 30% of the global attributable fraction. We aimed to estimate the yield and effectiveness of two-sample fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program in China. Eligible individuals were invited for two-sample FIT between 2007 and 2021, with positive ones (cutoff: 40 μg/g before 2013, and 20 μg/g thereafter) referred for colonoscopy. Participation rates, detection rates, and positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated. Participants were classified into: FIT+ / colonoscopy compliers, FIT+ / colonoscopy non-compliers, and FIT- as controls. We compared CRC incidence and mortality, and calculated the age reaching comparable risk. Among 246,349 invitees, 150,524 (61.10%) participated in two-sample FIT, with 16,994 (11.29%) identified as FIT+; 12,816 (75.41%) underwent colonoscopy, yielding a detection rate and PPV of 0.57% and 6.70% for advanced neoplasia. Median follow-up was 10.58 years. Compared with FIT- participants, CRC incidence and mortality were relatively similar among FIT+ / colonoscopy compliers with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.94 (0.75-1.19) and 1.62 (1.09-2.41), but higher among non-compliers with HR and 95% CI of 3.52 (2.85-4.34) and 4.41 (2.96-6.55). Taking CRC incidence and mortality risk of FIT- participants at age 50.0 as the benchmark, FIT+ / colonoscopy compliers reached same risk at 50.6 and 46.1 years, while non-compliers at age 38.0 and 37.9 years, respectively. Two-sample FIT could effectively identify high-risk populations, and colonoscopy compliance is associated with a lower risk of CRC incidence and mortality. This strategy might facilitate CRC screening practice in countries with large populations.

Screening kolorektálního karcinomu v České republice – minulost, současnost a budoucnost

The National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program has been conducted in the Czech Republic since 2000 and serves as an example of interdisciplinary collaboration. Specialists from gastroenterology, general practice, gynecology, and clinical biochemistry are involved in the program. It is based on two primary methods: the screening fecal immunochemical test for occult bleeding (iFOBT, FIT) and preventive colonoscopy (FOBT-positive colonoscopy and screening colonoscopy). The program‘s effectiveness is evidenced by the high number of detected colorectal precancerous and malignant lesions. Between 2006 and 2023, a total of 531,362 preventive colonoscopies were performed, diagnosing 202,575 patients with adenomas (38.1%) and 14,473 patients with cancers (2.7%). Program quality is monitored by indicators focused on both organization (target population coverage) and screening methods. Coverage with screening tests in a 2-year interval has consistently ranged around 30%, except between 2020 and 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic (27%), reaching 30.0% in 2023. Non-screening tests also affect epidemiological indicators, with total coverage by all relevant methods in a 2-year interval in 2023 amounting to 37.5%. Colonoscopies are evaluated using six parameters (number of examinations, bowel preparation quality, total colonoscopies, and adenoma detection rate in total, in both women and men). In 2023, 72% of screening colonoscopy centers met all of these indicators. FOBT analyzers now must have the regular external quality assessment (EQA), which should help stabilize test positivity, standing at 9.1% in 2023. Thanks to the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, favorable epidemiological trends have been observed, with a 32.3% decrease in incidence and a 47.8% decrease in mortality between 2000 and 2022. The future of the program lies in its further optimization, with a goal of both increasing coverage of the target population by examination and quality improvement, ensuring the program’s feasibility and efficiency. Key words: colorectal cancer – adenoma – screening – colonoscopy – fecal immunochemical test – quality indicators

Decision-analytic modelling of costs & benefits of adding sigmoidoscopy to CRC screening in Germany

Abstract Background In Germany, a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme is in place that entitles individuals to a stool test or colonoscopy. However, less than half of those eligible participate. The inclusion of an additional screening option, such as the evidence-based sigmoidoscopy, could lead to a higher overall participation rate, but also to individuals preferring the additional option to the more effective colonoscopy. The objective of this modelling study is to estimate the impact of offering sigmoidoscopy as an additional option for CRC screening in Germany. Methods A life-time mathematical model (Markov model) is developed to analyse the long-term effects of the additional offer of sigmoidoscopy on benefits (prevalence, mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)), costs, and cost-effectiveness. The model is based on systematic literature reviews and real-world healthcare data. It incorporates disease development, sensitivity and specificity of the options, compliance rates, survival probabilities and background mortality. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to estimate the future uptake of the options (stool test, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, no screening) based on stated preferences of n = 666 individuals. Results Adding sigmoidoscopy leads to greater effectiveness of the CRC screening programme in terms of increased screening participation, increased adenoma detection, decreased disease-specific mortality, and improved discounted HRQoL. However, it also incurs higher costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for men and women are €507 per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALYg) and €74 per QALYg, respectively. Conclusions The results indicate that the inclusion of sigmoidoscopy in the German CRC screening programme would be cost-effective and that sigmoidoscopy should be piloted in practice. The expanded programme has the potential to enhance the program’s effectiveness, improve health outcomes, and reduce the burden of CRC. Key messages • Expanding the CRC screening programme may increase overall participation, resulting in higher costs, but also greater effectiveness in detecting more adenomas, reducing mortality, improving HRQoL. • Introducing sigmoidoscopy in Germany appears cost-effective and justifies practical piloting to enhance CRC screening efficacy and health outcomes.

Colorectal screening program implementation in primary health care, in Loures-Odivelas, Portugal

Abstract Problem In 2020, Portugal had the highest cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the European Union (103 new cases/100,000 inhabitants). The Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (CRCS) is based on fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) as the primary screening method. With the delivery of the stool sample collection device; instruction on its use is provided by the Primary Health Care team. The sample is processed at the Clinical Pathology laboratory of the Hospital Center (HC). In case of a positive result, the general practitioner communicates the result and refers the individual to the Follow-up and Treatment Center. Description The general objective of this project was to implement the CRCS in the 19 Family Health Units (FHU) of Loures-Odivelas Health Center Group, between September 2022 and April 2023. The following activities were carried out: 1. Sessions to present the patient pathway, record platform, and stool sample collection device; 2. Application of a checklist of essential points for the start of screening; 3. Preparation and dissemination of monitoring reports to the FHU; 4. Follow-up visits to clarify doubts. Results By March 2023, CRCS had been implemented in 15 of the 19 FHU (79%). Between September 2022 and March 2023, 1,430 devices were delivered and 959 FOBT samples were received (67%). Among the devices received with biological samples, it was not possible to issue a result for 5%. Lessons The activities carried out allowed for the initiation of CRCS in most FHU. The involvement of professionals in these activities contributes to increased patient adherence and proper collection technique, reducing inconclusive FOBT results. It is necessary to continue this strategy of personalized support for the FHU to consolidate the implementation of CRCS in LO HCG. Ensuring that the necessary materials are available and that result issuance and referral deadlines are met are important factors for maintaining professional motivation. Key messages • The objective was to implement the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (CRCS) in 19 Family Health Units (FHU) in Loures-Odivelas. By March 2023, CRCS had been implemented in 15 of 19 FHU (79%). • It is important to continue these activities in order to put into operation the CRCS in all FHU and to tackle the problem of colorectal cancer.

15 years of the Colorrectal Cancer Screening Programme. Decreasing inequalities

Abstract Background The Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Programme approved in 2008 by the Regional Parliament and carried out in 2009 a pilot study inviting to residents 50-69 years old (586,700), through a biennial Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), colonoscopy in FIT positive. The Programme Coordinating Centre sends FIT by post and involves Primary Care and Endoscopy departments in process and results control. In 2013, 100% coverage was reached, and in 2023 more than 80% were invited more than 6 times. However, inequalities in participation were detected: by age, gender, deprivation and vulnerability. Since 2014, different strategies have been carried out in order to decrease with the commitment of authorities, researchers and associations. Objectives To describe strategies and results to decrease inequalities in participation Results From the pilot participation rate increased (p < 0.001) 58.1% to 72.0% in 2023. Inequalities by gender (69.4 men vs 74.4% women) and deprivation index were detected (55.7/1000 lower vs high 41.0/1000). The non-adherence to colonoscopy was 5% along the period. Training, and communication campaigns developed. 2016-2017 special recruitment for imprisoned and mental health patients increasing participation rate (9.3 to 97.1%). In 2021 and ongoing: thanks to Resilience Funds (European Union), strategies were implemented: SMS specific by sex, research health literacy, studying CRC behavior by sex in FIT sensitivity 85.4% (CI95% 84.2-86.7) in men and 80.9% (CI95% (79. -82.6) in women p < 0.001 Conclusions The governance and involvement of professionals, researchers and patient associations crucial to decrease inequalities. The Basque Programme achieved one of the highest participation rate. Investment in reducing barriers will probably impact on the reduction of incidence and mortality. Key messages • A population based CRC Screening Programme reduces incidence and mortality on participants. • Intervention to increase participation reduces inequities and is crucial on Public Health policies.

Optimizing Colorectal Screening in Portugal with Process Mining

Abstract Background Efficient healthcare screening programs management influences patient outcomes. Process mining has emerged as a powerful tool to enhance these programs by refining complex workflows and pinpointing operational deviations. Objectives This study utilizes process mining techniques to analyze the colorectal cancer screening program in Northern Portugal, focusing on detecting deviations and performance bottlenecks in process models. Methods This screening program started in March 2018, but process mining was only used on data posterior to 2020. Over 1 million case observations from administrative data were included in the process model analysis, involving more than six key process activities and numerous resources. We used new software and statistical tools for process mining to rapidly compute observations and filter for different operational needs and monitor interventions. Results The discovery analysis identified deviations, such as unexpected performance issues and irregular activity sequences. Although over 100 traces were identified, fewer than five traces accounted for more than 90% of all case paths, indicating the most common traces that have a true impact in participation rates, referral rates, and treatment rates. Notable differences in resource performance during specific periods, such as COVID-19 or seasonal events, were also observed. These findings provided insights for adjusting resource allocation and improving coordination, with impact in minimizing seasonal phenomena or peak production periods. Lessons Process mining offers actionable insights for effective health program coordination, enabling the monitoring and timely response to process deviations. With key areas for action identified in a more timely and precise manner, we can enhance efficiency, and expand population coverage and treatment referral. Future initiatives will focus on further process optimization and national coverage expansion using these management tools. Key messages • Process mining revolutionizes healthcare by enabling the strategic management of complex oncological screening program workflows. • Comprehensive data analysis across the patient pathway enhances program efficiency and expands treatment access.

Impact of colorectal cancer screening programme on survival and employment in Taiwan: A nationwide analysis of real-world data.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to life loss and a significant economic burden, which could be reduced by CRC screening. We assessed the potential savings of lives and employment to evaluate the effectiveness of the Taiwan CRC Screening Programme. Through interlinkages among Taiwan Cancer Registry, National Mortality Registry, Taiwan CRC Screening Database, and National Health Insurance claim data, we enroled patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, aged 50-74years and diagnosed during 2004-2017, and followed them up to 2018. Life expectancy (LE), lifetime employment duration (LED), loss-of-LE and loss-of-LED were calculated, compared with age-, sex- and calendar year-matched cohorts. Assuming no difference within a specific stage for screen-detected versus non-screen detected CRC and weighting them by different stage distributions, we compared the total loss-of-LE and loss-of-LED. The cohort enroled 77,169 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, which included 31,728 women (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [7.1] years) and 45,441 men (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [6.8] years). The mean loss-of-LE and loss-of-LED in women were 6.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-6.3) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.8-1.1) year(s), whereas those in men were 5.1 (95% CI 4.9-5.4) and 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.2) years, respectively. Among the cohort, 53,678 cases had the screening information. On average, screening potentially saved 2.9 (95% CI 2.6-3.2) years of life expectancy plus 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) years of employment per case in women and 2.7 (95% CI 2.5-3.0) years plus 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7) years in men, respectively. The Taiwan CRC Screening Programme is associated with the savings of lives and employment duration. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of beginning screening at a younger age after accounting for saving employment loss and possibly adjusting lead time bias.

Evaluation of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Among People With Cystic Fibrosis.

We aimed to evaluate the Danish CRC screening program, estimate colonic neoplasia's prevalence, and assess the utilized BP regimens. People with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) have an increased risk of precancerous polyps and colorectal cancer (CRC), with occurrence at an earlier age compared with the general population. Consequently, colonoscopy screening is recommended. PwCF requires specific bowel preparation (BP) regimens to ensure an adequate colonoscopy. We conducted a national retrospective cohort study, which included all pwCF eligible for colonoscopy according to international recommendations in 26 months. Among 119 eligible pwCF, 58 completed colonoscopies during the screening period. The screening was omitted in 25% of pwCF. Among the pwCF undergoing colonoscopy screening, precancerous polyps were found in 24% and none with CRC. One patient developed CRC before being offered screening. Risk factors for neoplasia were old age and male sex. The quality of BP was high, even though most pwCF received standard BP. The best quality was found in nonorgan transplanted, pwCF who received modulator treatment and those with no laxatives use. We detected a high adherence to CRC screening, but also a substantial proportion of pwCF who were not informed about screening recommendations, calling for greater awareness among clinicians. Although lower than previously described, our study revealed high numbers of precancerous polyps and CRC compared with the general population, underlining the need for screening. BP quality remained high, despite frequent use of standard regimens, implicating the need for more individualized regimens before undergoing colonoscopy.

B-335 Analytical Performance of the Novel EQA Material for Fecal Immunochemical Test for Hemoglobin

Abstract Background EQA (external quality assurance) program for FIT (fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin) is performed in many countries, and its demand increases as FIT is widely used in organized colorectal cancer screening programs. The materials used in FIT EQA vary from buffer-based liquid control, and lyophilized stool, to material that mimics stool, artificial stool. We could not find ideal EQA material with hemoglobin uniformly contained, good stability of hemoglobin, and ease in use such as ready-to-use form. The merit to use material that simulates actual sample, stool, is not only to be compliant with ISO15189 but also to suit various methods and sampling devices in FIT. The development of artificial stool material has been awaited by laboratories using FIT to evaluate errors and precisions in specimen collection.We assessed the analytical performance of the new artificial stool developed in HECTEF (Health Care Technology Foundation) to evaluate this artificial stool material was suitable as an EQA material. We examined the following three points: 1) Sample collection, 2) Uniformity, and 3) Stability of hemoglobin. Methods 1) Sample collection: The material was collected with the sampling probes of OC-Auto Sampling Bottle 3 (Eiken Chemical) and the collection amount was calculated by comparing the weight before and after sampling the artificial stool. 2) Uniformity: The uniformity of hemoglobin was evaluated during production before and after bottling based on “Uniformity of dosage units” section of The Japanese Pharmacopoeia 18th edition, 2021. The material was sampled from 10 different points and hemoglobin concentrations were measured using OC-Sensor DIANA. The uniformity of hemoglobin between the vials was evaluated by calculating the CV from the average of hemoglobin concentrations from samples of three points from three vials. 3) Stability of hemoglobin: The materials stored under different temperature conditions were compared with the material stored frozen at -20 °C. Storage conditions were at refrigeration for 20 months, at 30 °C for 1 month, and freeze-thawing for five times. Evaporation from the material was evaluated by weighing the samples before and after storage at 30 °C for 1 month. Results 1) Sample collection: The material was collected with sampling probes and the collection amounts were 106% (compared to theoretical amount).2) Uniformity: Uniformity of hemoglobin during production was within the specification of “Uniformity of dosage units” section of the pharmacopoeias, acceptance value<15.0. Uniformity of hemoglobin among three vials was within ±10% CV.3) Stability of hemoglobin: Stabilities of the material were all within ±10% from the control material (frozen) after storage at all temperature conditions. Evaporation from the material in a vial was below 1% at 30 °C storage for 1 month. Conclusions This artificial stool is suitable for EQA material because it is confirmed that it shows favorable analytical results in sample collection, uniformity, and stability of hemoglobin. The evaluation of this material in the EQA program to show its suitability was performed by Labquality. The result is reported in a poster at ADLM 2024.

Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

The rate of interval colorectal cancer (iCRC) is now accepted as a key performance indicator of organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. We aimed to examine the association between endoscopist volumes and the rate of iCRC among individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within a nationwide population-based CRC screening program. Individuals aged ≥ 50 years who underwent colonoscopy after a positive FIT from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2020 in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) were enrolled. We converted the data into per-endoscopist screening results, calculated the iCRC rates per endoscopist, and compared them to the previous year's annual volume that was divided into five groups (V1, 1-9; V2, 10-29; V3, 30-59; V4, 60-119; V5, ≥ 120). A total of 10,412 endoscopists performed 216,907 colonoscopies. Overall, the average rate of iCRC per endoscopist was 8.46 per 1,000 examinations. Compared with the group with the highest volume (V5 group), the rate of iCRC was 2.21 times higher in the V1 group. Similar trends were observed in the other groups (V2: relative risks [RR], 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57 to 2.94; V3: RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.13; V4: RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.67). The findings emphasize that endoscopists with lower procedure volumes have higher risks of interval cancer being missed or undetected. To maximize the preventative impact of colonoscopy for CRC, this issue should be addressed by monitoring endoscopist volumes and variations in performances.

Enhancing colorectal cancer screening in high-risk population through fecal immunochemical test surveillance: Results from a surveillance program.

Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy-based surveillance to decrease the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) among these participants with above-average risk. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) holds promise as a viable alternative surveillance tool, but the existing evidence regarding the use of settings remains limited. Therefore, our aim is to evaluate the CRC incidence rates in individuals with above-average CRC risk and the relationship between FIT surveillance and CRC incidence. The retrospective cohort study was performed based on the CRC screening program between January 2012 and December 2022, in Tianjin, China. This cohort study included 12,515 participants aged 40-74 years with above-average risk. The primary outcomes were the incidence rates of CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia which were expressed as the number of events per 100,000 person-years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. We included 12,515 participants aged 40-74 years, of whom 4980 received subsequent FIT surveillance during the study period. Among these participants, 51 CRC cases occurred in the non-FIT surveillance group (incidence rate, 233.88 per 100,000 person-years) and there were 29 cases of CRC in the FIT surveillance group (incidence rate, 184.85 per 100,000 person-years), resulting in an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.37-0.91). Meanwhile, 428 advanced colorectal neoplasia cases were reported in the non-FIT surveillance group, while 269 cases occurred in the FIT surveillance group, with significantly lower incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the FIT surveillance group (IRR: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.74). Compared with the non-FIT surveillance group, the FIT surveillance group had a 54% decreased risk of developing CRC (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.74) and a 45% decreased risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47-0.64). In this retrospective cohort study, above-average risk individuals who received subsequent FIT in the intervals between colonoscopies were associated with a reduction of CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia incidence, which indicated the value and utility of FIT in the surveillance program.

Effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: a review of current scientific evidence

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Its incidence and mortality could be reduce through primary prevention activities, which include healthy lifestyle behavior and avoidance of risk factors, and through screening (secondary prevention). Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different colorectal cancer screening strategies is within the scope of interest of different health professionals. Therefore, the aim of this review is to synthesis the current scientific evidence that addresses the issues of effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs and new methods for its early diagnosis.

Harm-to-Benefit Ratio of Fecal Immunochemical Test–Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Given Prior Fecal Hemoglobin Concentrations

This study aimed to provide evidence on the harm-to-benefit ratio of fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by previous fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb) concentrations, as reflected in the number needed to screen (NNS) and number needed to scope (NNSc). Participants in up to 4 FIT screening rounds of the Dutch CRC screening program were included. The main outcomes of this study were the NNS and NNSc to detect 1 CRC and/or advanced neoplasia (AN) in screening rounds 2, 3, or 4, conditional on previous f-Hb concentrations. Outcomes were compared between participants using chi-square tests and logistic regression. In total, 2,428,883 study participants completed at least 2 consecutive FITs, 1,308,684 completed 3 FITs, and 150,958 completed 4 FITs. There were 31,400, 16,060, and 2007 ANs detected by round, respectively. The NNS for individuals with vs without a history of detectable f-Hb differed significantly irrespective of screening round. Individuals without detectable f-Hb in previous negative FITs had almost 9 times the NNS to detect 1 AN compared with those with detectable f-Hb (odds ratio, 8.71; 95% confidence interval, 8.51-8.92). A similar directional pattern was observed for NNSc, although the differences were smaller (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-2.8). The harm-to-benefit ratio of FIT-based screening is substantially greater in individuals without vs with prior detectable f-Hb. Less intensive screening should be considered for this lower-risk group.

Where do we stand with screening for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma based on serum protein biomarkers? A systematic review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been proven to reduce both mortality and the incidence of this disease. Most CRC screening programs are based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which have a low participation rate. Searching for blood protein biomarkers can lead to the development of a more accepted screening test. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic potential of the most promising serum protein biomarkers. A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases between January 2010 and December 2023. Studies assessing blood protein biomarkers for CRC screening were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of each biomarker were collected. Among 4685 screened studies, 94 were considered for analysis. Most of them were case-control studies, leading to an overestimation of the performance of candidate biomarkers. The performance of no protein biomarker or combination of biomarkers appears to match that of the FIT. Studies with a suitable design and population, testing new assay techniques, or based on algorithms combining FIT with serum tests are needed.

Participation and Yield in Multiple Rounds of Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The evidence on the cumulative participation and yield in multiple rounds of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on fecal immunochemical test is sparse. We aimed to assess the trends in participation and detection for advanced colorectal neoplasm under different screening intervals in multiround fecal immunochemical testing-based CRC screening by synthesizing the current available evidence. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were retrieved from January 1, 2002, to April 16, 2024, for potential eligible studies, and then, we synthesized participation and advanced colorectal neoplasm detection rates for each screening round, along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nineteen studies involving a total of 2,296,071 individuals were included. As screening rounds increased, participation exhibited a gradual consistent increase, reaching 78.45% and 74.97% for annual and biennial screening strategies. For annual screening, the cumulative detection rates for 3 rounds were 1.38% (95% CI: 1.18%-1.63%), 1.95% (95% CI: 1.72%-2.21%), and 2.50% (95% CI: 2.29%-2.72%), respectively. For biennial screening, the cumulative detection rates for 4 rounds were 2.22% (95% CI: 1.22%-3.22%), 3.44% (95% CI: 2.06%-4.82%), 4.26% (95% CI: 2.70%-5.83%), and 5.10% (95% CI: 3.28%-7.29%), respectively. Notably, the per-round detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasms declined yet as the screening progressed. In population-based CRC screening programs, the participation exhibited a slow upward trend for both screening strategies, but the incremental benefits in CRC detection gradually diminished. Tailored strategies, such as extending intervals for individuals with multiple negative fecal immunochemical testing results, might optimize effectiveness and cost-efficiency in population-based CRC screening.

Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Preventive Measures Among Residents of Riyadh.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant challenge to healthcare providers. Spreading awareness, providing preventive measures, and implementing screening programs are essential for detecting and halting the progression of the disease and decreasing the mortality associated with this type of malignancy. This study aimed to assess public knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer preventive measures and screening programs among residents of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and also to design better healthcare interventions or policy development. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out among residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to participants using a Google survey. The questionnaire consisted of socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, and occupation), a general understanding of CRC and its prevention, risk factors for developing CRC, barriers to undergoing CRC screening, and a 21-item questionnaire to assess awareness of CRC preventive measures. Results Of the 420 respondents, 301 (71.7%) were female, and 134 (31.9%) were between 18 and 29 years old. The overall mean awareness score was 12.5 (SD 3.05) out of 21 points. Accordingly, 240 (57.1%) were categorized as having moderate awareness, 70 (16.7%) as good, and 110 (26.2%) had poor awareness levels. Being younger, being unmarried, having heard of CRC and screening tests that detect colon cancer, and being aware of the CRC early detection campaign in Saudi Arabia were the factors associated with increased awareness. Conclusion There was modest awareness of CRC preventive measures among residents living in Riyadh. Significant predictors of increased awareness include younger age, being unmarried, having heard of CRC, having heard of screening tests to detect CRC, and awareness of the CRC early-detection campaigns in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare providers have a vital role in increasing awareness of CRC's preventive measures.

Differential Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comparative Study of Swedish Nationwide Screening and Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathways.

In 2021, a nation-wide screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) was step-wise implemented in Region Örebro County (RÖC) for patients aged 60 to 74 years, utilizing the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) to refer patients for colonoscopy. Concurrently, the standardized care course for colorectal cancer (SCC-CRC), initiated in 2016, employs a fast-track pathway for patients with alarm symptoms to undergo colonoscopy. This study compares CRC screening colonoscopies with SCC-CRC colonoscopies in RÖC among patients aged 60 to 67 years. An initial analysis of the Swedish colorectal screening cohort was combined with a retrospective cohort study, analyzing data from 307 CRC screening patients and 441 age-matched SCC-CRC patients in RÖC. Data included demographics, colonoscopy participation rates, and pathology findings. Statistical analyses compared outcomes between the 2 groups. Among the screening group, 2% tested positive for FIT, with an 86% colonoscopy participation rate (N=9296). In RÖC, 266 screening patients underwent colonoscopy, with 10% diagnosed with CRC, compared with 20% in the SCC-CRC group. In addition, 39% of the screening group in RÖC were diagnosed with advanced adenomas, versus 15% in the SCC-CRC group. Screening participation was high, with effectiveness aligning with international counterparts. The SCC-CRC pathway excels in diagnosing CRC among symptomatic patients, while the nationwide screening program is effective in early detection of CRC and advanced adenomas. underscoring the importance of integrating and optimizing both approaches within the Swedish health care system to optimize CRC prevention and management.

Clinicopathological and molecular differences between stage IV screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in the Flemish screening program.

Interval cancer (IC) is an important quality indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Previously, we found that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) ICs are more common in women, older age, right-sided tumors, and advanced stage. Here, we extended our existing stage IV patient cohort with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, to identify factors associated with FIT-IC. Logistic regression models were fit to identify variables associated with the odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Multivariate models were corrected for gender, age, and location. A total of 292 screen-detected (SD) CRCs and 215 FIT-IC CRCs were included. FIT-IC CRC had 5 fold higher odds to be a neuroendocrine (NET) tumor and 2.5 fold higher odds to have lymphovascular invasion. Interestingly, some variables lost significance upon accounting for location. Thus, tumor location is a critical covariate that should always be included when evaluating factors related to FIT-IC. We identified NETs and lymphovascular invasion as factors associated with increased odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Moreover, we highlight the importance of tumor location as a covariate in evaluating FIT-IC related factors. More research across all stages is needed to clarify how these insights might help to optimize the Flemish CRC screening program.

Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health issue where early detection is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and survival rates. This comprehensive review assesses the utility of stool-based tests in CRC screening, including traditional fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), both chemical (gFOBT) and immunochemical techniques (FIT), as well as multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) as a novel and promising biomarker. The advancements, limitations and the impact of false positives and negatives of these methods are examined. The review analyzed various studies on current screening methods, focusing on laboratory tests and biomarkers. Findings indicate that while FIT and mt-sDNA tests offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity over traditional guaiac-based FOBT, they also come with higher costs and potential for increased false positives. FIT shows better patient adherence due to its ease to use, but incorrect usage and interpretation of FOBT can lead to significant diagnostic errors. In conclusion, despite the improvements in FOBT methods like FIT in CRC detection, careful consideration of each method's benefits and drawbacks is essential. Effective CRC screening programs should combine various methods tailored to specific population needs, aiming for early detection and reduced mortality rates.

Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Completion in an Integrated Academic-Community Healthcare System.

Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach is an effective strategy to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of this study was to determine the patient-level, clinic-level, and geographic-level factors associated with CRC screening completion in a mailed FIT outreach program. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the integrated healthcare system of University of Washington Medicine and included patients aged 50-75 years, who were due for CRC screening, and had a primary care encounter in the past 3 years. Eligible patients received mailed outreach that included a letter with information about CRC screening, FIT kit, and a prepaid return envelope. CRC screening and factors associated with completion were obtained from electronic health records and the CRC screening program database. Of the 9,719 patients who received mailed outreach, 29.6% completed FIT mailed outreach. The median FIT return time was 27 days (interquartile range 14-54). On multivariate analysis, patients with a higher area deprivation index, insured through Medicaid, living without a partner, and whose last primary care visit was >12 months ago were less likely to complete a FIT compared with their counterparts. Over a 12-month period, overall CRC screening across the health system increased by 2 percentage points (68%-70%). Mailed FIT outreach in an integrated academic-community practice was feasible, with 32% of invited patients completing CRC screening by FIT or colonoscopy, on par with published literature. Patient and geographic-level factors were associated with CRC screening completion. These data will inform additional interventions aimed to increase CRC screening participation in this population.