Screening In Pediatric Primary Care Research Articles

Lessons learned from a quality improvement intervention to support implementation of childhood adversity screening in pediatric primary care

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic exposures that can derail child health and development. This quality improvement intervention implemented and evaluated a process to adopt ACEs screening in five New Hampshire pediatric primary care clinics. Clinics received support including coaching, training, and tools to plan and pilot ACEs screening over a 15-month period. Despite the co-occurring COVID-19 pandemic, the five clinics conducted 1195 screens with 142 (12%) families indicating a level of risk. Significant increases in clinician knowledge and confidence with these screening and response processes were noted. Increases in clinic self-assessment scores were observed. Lessons learned included shortening the intervention period to 12 months and the importance of building local referral relationships. Recommendations for advancing ACEs screening are offered.

Adverse childhood experiences screening in healthcare settings: A focus on pediatric primary care

BackgroundAdverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) screening in healthcare settings is emerging as one of the tangible responses to address the consistent evidence linking ACEs with health. Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) began ACEs screening in pediatric primary care in 2018 and has developed screening and referral processes based on continued feedback from stakeholders as well as data driven assessment. ObjectiveWe give an overview of the state of ACEs screening in pediatric healthcare settings, challenges facing pediatric providers, and suggestions to address them. We then describe the development of our ACEs screening and referral process within KPSC as an example of how a large healthcare system has implemented and adapted ACEs screening from pilot testing, to phased expansion, to complete implementation. Participants and settingChildren aged 2–18 years old who were members of KPSC 2018–2023. ResultsWe present data on the tailored screening and referral workflows we have developed, rates of positive screens and referrals, and how the initiation of ACEs screening may affect the rates of visit to behavioral health as a treatment option. We also integrate qualitative data to demonstrate the perspective of parents, with the goal of understanding what might help or hinder receipt of behavioral health treatment after ACEs screening. ConclusionsWe close with future directions for ACEs screening in healthcare settings and considerations for pediatric healthcare providers who may want to begin ACEs screening or adapt their screening and referral processes.

Behavior Problems in Low-Income Young Children Screened in Pediatric Primary Care

Screening of behavior problems in young children in pediatric primary care is essential to timely intervention and optimizing trajectories for social-emotional development. Identifying differential behavior problem trajectories provides guidance for tailoring prevention and treatment. To identify trajectories of behavior problems in children 2 to 6 years of age screened in pediatric primary care. This retrospective cohort study identified trajectories of behavior problems and demographic and clinical correlates. Data were collected as part of routine care in 3 pediatric primary care offices and 3 school-based health centers in Ohio serving a primarily low-income population. In total, 15 218 children aged 2 to 6 years with well-child visits between July 13, 2016, and January 31, 2022, were included. Caregivers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at annual well-child visits. Trajectory groups were identified using latent growth mixture modeling of SDQ total difficulties scores, and relative risk ratio (RRR) of various demographic (eg, race) and clinical (eg, depression in caregiver) variables were assessed by multinomial logistic regression analysis. Of 15 281 children (51.3% males), 10 410 (68.1%) were African American or Black, 299 (2.0%) were Asian, 13 (0.1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 876 (5.7%) were multiracial, 26 (0.2%) were Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, 2829 (18.5%) were White, and 39 (0.02%) were categorized as other. In addition, 944 (6.2%) identified as Hispanic and 14 246 (93.2%) as non-Hispanic. Four behavior problem trajectory groups reflecting severity were identified: low-stable (LS; 10 096 [66.1%]), moderate-decreasing (MD; 16.6%), low-increasing (LI; 13.1%), and high-increasing (HI; 4.3%). Relative to the LS group, patients in each elevated group were more likely to be male (HI RRR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.55-2.26]; MD RRR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.41-1.71]; and LI RRR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.70-2.21]), White (HI RRR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.83-2.81]; MD RRR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.13-1.45]; and LI RRR, 1.54, [95% CI, 1.32-1.81]), publicly insured (HI RRR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.84]; MD RRR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.43-0.73]; and LI RRR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.35-0.73]), have a social need (HI RRR, 3.07 [95% CI, 2.53-3.73]; MD RRR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.82-2.25]; and LI RRR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.84-2.44]), and have a caregiver with depression (HI RRR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.38-2.00]; MD RRR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.31-1.58]; and LI RRR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.23-1.58]). Relative to the LI group, patients in the MD group were less likely to be male (RRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93). The substantial portion of young children with increased behavior problems observed in this cohort study underscores the need for screening in pediatric primary care. Caregivers with depression and family social needs warrant prioritization in early prevention and treatment to alter elevated trajectories.

"Why Do They Want to Know?": A Qualitative Assessment of Caregiver Perspectives on Social Drivers of Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.

Despite strong evidence that social factors have a large influence on child health, systematic screening for social needs is not performed universally in pediatric primary care. This is due to multiple barriers, including concerns about acceptability to families. This study sought to assess family acceptability of social needs screening in pediatric primary care. Eight semi-structured focus groups were performed with English and Spanish-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients from a diverse academic medical center. Focus groups explored the acceptability of social domains including housing, education, finances, food access, and safety. Focus group transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify themes. Four salient themes emerged: 1) the acceptability of social determinants of health screening questions was tied to participants' understanding of the connection between the topic and child health, 2) families preferred a warm handoff to community services, 3) families feared child protective services intervention as a result of sharing unmet social needs, and 4) positive provider rapport was an important factor in choosing to share social needs. Pediatric primary care providers should feel comfortable implementing social needs screening when they can clearly explain the connection to child health. They should become knowledgeable about organizations and partners within their communities and feel empowered to connect patients to these resources.

Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Implementing Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) Screening in Los Angeles County Pediatric Clinics.

To understand clinician and clinical staff perspectives on the implementation of routine Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) screening in pediatric primary care. We conducted a qualitative evaluation in 5 clinics in Los Angeles County, California, using 2 rounds of focus group discussions: during an early phase of the initiative, and 7 months later. In the first round, we conducted 14 focus group discussions with 67 participants. In the second round, we conducted 12 focus group discussions with 58 participants. Participants comprised clinic staff involved in ACE screening, including frontline staff that administer the screening, medical clinicians that use screening to counsel patients and make referrals, and psychosocial support staff who may receive referrals. Themes were grouped into 3 categories: (1) screening acceptability and perceived utility, (2) implementation and quality improvement, and (3) effects of screening on patients and clinicians. Regarding screening acceptability and perceived utility, clinicians generally considered ACE screening to be acceptable and useful. In terms of implementation and quality improvement, significant barriers included: insufficient time for screening and response, insufficient training, and lack of clarity about referral networks and resources that could be offered to patients. Lastly, regarding effects of screening, clinicians expressed that ACE screening helped elicit important patient information and build trust with patients. Further, no adverse events were reported from screening. Clinic staff felt ACE screening was feasible, acceptable, and beneficial within pediatric care settings to improve trauma-informed care and that ACE screening could be strengthened by addressing time constraints and limited referral resources.

Adapting an Electronic STI Risk Assessment Program for Use in Pediatric Primary Care.

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are an ongoing public health issue in adolescents. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and American Academy of Pediatrics have and continue to recommend STI screening in at-risk adolescents, however screening and testing continues to lag behind the need. We previously designed and implemented an electronic risk assessment tool to support STI testing in our pediatric emergency department. Pediatric primary care clinics may be better positioned for STI risk assessments, as they can offer greater privacy and confidentiality, a lower stress environment, and greater opportunity for longitudinal care. STI risk assessment and testing continues to be a challenge in this setting. The goal of this work was to evaluate the usability of our electronic tool to support adaptation and implementation in pediatric primary care practices. We conducted qualitative interviews of pediatricians, clinic staff, and adolescents from 4 pediatric practices as part of a study whose goal is to ultimately implement STI screening in pediatric primary care. The goal of the interviews were (1) to understand contextual factors related to STI screening in primary care, which we have reported previously, and (2) to obtain feedback on our electronic platform, the questionnaire content, and their perspective on implementing it in primary care settings, which we report here. We received quantitative feedback using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a validated, reliable tool to measure the usability of hardware, software, websites, and applications. SUS scores range from a score of 0 to 100, with a score of 68 or higher indicating above average usability. We additionally obtained qualitative feedback via interviews and used inductive analysis to identify common themes. We recruited 14 physicians, 9 clinic staff, and 12 adolescents. Participants rated the tool highly using the SUS, with a median score of 92.5 (threshold for average usability is 68) and an interquartile range of 82.5 to 100. Thematically, all participants perceived a need for such a screening program and indicated the format would encourage more honest responses on the topic adolescents. We used these results to modify the questionnaire prior to implementing it into participating practices. We demonstrated that our electronic STI risk assessment tool had a high level of usability and could be adapted for use in pediatric primary care.

Mental Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: Factors Associated With Screening Completion and Elevated Scores.

This study aimed to examine predictors of complete and elevated youth mental health screens. Parents of 4- to 11-year-old children completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) during a routine, universal mental health screening initiative in primary care. Bivariate logistic regressions were run to examine associations between independent (visit age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, insurance, and guardian) and dependent variables (screening completion and elevated SDQ score). Parents of younger and Spanish-speaking (vs English-speaking) children were less likely to have a complete SDQ screen. Among those with complete SDQ screens, older children, male children, those with public or no insurance, and those who had a mother (vs father) complete the screener were more likely to have an elevated score. Understanding patterns of screening completion rates and predictors of elevated screens provides valuable information to improve resource mapping and planning. Findings can inform mental health screening implementation and optimization within primary care.

The impact of maternal depression on child mental health treatment and models for integrating care: a systematic review.

Maternal depression negatively impacts child mental health and is a well-known risk factor for child psychopathology. However, maternal depression treatment and child mental health treatment are rarely integrated. The purpose of this review was to assess the impact of maternal depression on child mental health treatment, including (1) how treatment of maternal depression affects child mental health outcomes, (2) the impact of maternal depression on children receiving mental health care, and (3) emerging models that address maternal depression in primary-care pediatrics and child mental health settings. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and PsycInfo. Initial search yielded 224 records, and after exclusion, 29 papers were reviewed. Effective treatment of maternal depression is associated with a significant decrease in child psychiatric symptoms. Maternal depression negatively affects child mental health treatment in that there is a high rate of untreated mental illness among mothers of psychiatrically ill children, and maternal depression impedes effective child mental health treatment. Current models to address maternal depression in child settings include screening in pediatric primary care, psychotherapy for depressed mothers of psychiatrically ill children, and emerging models that integrate maternal and child mental health treatment. Effective treatment of maternal depression significantly improves child mental health and should be better integrated into child treatment. Opportunities to improve care include more robust screening for parental mental illness, supports to refer parents to psychiatric care, and on-site services for parents. Such interventions hold promise, but require significant support from a multidisciplinary team.

Feasibility of Food FARMacia: Mobile Food Pantry to Reduce Household Food Insecurity in Pediatric Primary Care.

Despite recommendations for systematic food insecurity screening in pediatric primary care, feasible interventions in clinical settings are lacking. The goal of this study was to examine reach, feasibility, and retention in Food FARMacia, a pilot clinically based food insecurity intervention among children aged <6 years. We examined electronic health record data to assess reach and performed a prospective, longitudinal study of families in Food FARMacia (May 2019 to January 2020) to examine attendance and retention. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to assess outcomes. Among 650 pediatric patients, 172 reported household food insecurity and 50 registered for Food FARMacia (child mean age 22 ± 18 months; 88% Hispanic/Latino). Demographic characteristics of Food FARMacia participants were similar to those of the target group. Median attendance rate was 75% (10 sessions) and retention in both the study and program was 68%. Older child age (retention: age 26.7 ± 18.7 months vs. attrition: age 12.1 ± 13.8 months, p = 0.01), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (retention: 97% vs. attrition: 69%, p < 0.01), and larger household size (retention: 4.5 ± 1.1 vs. attrition: 3.7 ± 1.4, p = 0.04) correlated with retention. A clinically based mobile food pantry pilot program and study reached the target population and were feasible.

Mental health screening in pediatric primary care for children with autism.

Children with autism experience high rates of co-occurring mental health conditions like challenging behaviors and anxiety. However, these co-occurring mental health needs are often not identified when they first become problematic. Pediatricians and their care staff are in a good position to identify mental health needs early and support families to connect to needed services. This study describes a project focused on mental health screening for children with autism in pediatric primary care clinics. Over half of eligible patients were screened using the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17. Many children with autism had clinically elevated scores, suggesting the need for mental health assessment or services. In particular, children with positive screens had clinical elevations on the challenging behavior and attention subscales of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17. This finding is consistent with typical trends in co-occurring challenging behavior presentations in children with autism. Mental health screening in primary care is feasible and offers a promising opportunity to identify co-occurring mental health needs for children with autism early. Screening rates varied between clinics, suggesting tailored to improve routine screening in pediatric primary care for children with autism.

COVID-19 and Adolescent Depression and Suicide Risk Screening Outcomes.

Mental health concerns increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, but previous studies have not examined depression screening in pediatric primary care. We aimed to describe changes in screening, depressive symptoms, and suicide risk among adolescents during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In a repeat cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data from a large pediatric primary care network, we compared the percentage of primary care visits where adolescents aged 12 to 21 were screened for depression, screened positive for depressive symptoms, or screened positive for suicide risk between June and December 2019 (prepandemic) and June and December 2020 (pandemic). Changes were examined overall, by month, and by sex, race and ethnicity, insurance type, and income. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate prevalence ratios (PRs) for the prepandemic to pandemic changes. Depression screening at primary care visits declined from 77.6% to 75.8% during the pandemic period (PR: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-1.06). The percentage of adolescents screening positive for depressive symptoms increased from 5.0% to 6.2% (PR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.15-1.34), with greater increases among female, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic white adolescents. Positive suicide risk screens increased from 6.1% to 7.1% (PR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26), with a 34% relative increase in reporting recent suicidal thoughts among female adolescents (PR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18-1.52). Results suggest that depression and suicide concerns have increased during the pandemic, especially among female adolescents. Results underscore the importance of consistent depression and suicidality screening.

Data Needs for Economic Evaluations of Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Research Framework.

Data Needs for Economic Evaluations of Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Research Framework.

Hearing Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.

1. Jordan K. Yoeli, MD*,† 2. Daniel Nicklas, MD*,† 1. *Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 2. †University of Colorado, Aurora, CO Screening for congenital and acquired deafness and hearing loss (HL) represents a significant responsibility for clinicians in all newborn units and medical homes. Approximately 1 to 3 infants of 1,000 born in a well infant nursery setting and 2 to 4 of 100 born in a NICU have significant bilateral HL. Outcomes in various developmental domains depend on the early recognition and subsequent intervention for HL. Developmental delay is present in 30% to 40% of children with HL; the goal of hearing screening (HS) and prompt intervention is to optimize a child’s language acquisition, cognitive development, literacy, social-emotional maturity and academic success. This article reviews the most up-to-date standards and practices to aid medical providers in the early detection and intervention for pediatric HL. In the United States, universal screening begins in the neonatal period. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Joint Commission on Infant Hearing (JCIH), all infants should be screened for congenital HL before 1 month of age. Most infants are screened in nursery or NICU settings, except for those born outside of a medical facility. For the latter population or for infants with no documented HS, screening should be completed by the medical home before 1 month of age. In a well nursery setting, most HSs are performed by otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing. During an OAE screen, a sensitive microphone in the ear canal records the cochlear responses (“acoustic emissions”) to acoustic stimuli, thereby testing the peripheral auditory system from the outer/middle ear (conduction zones) to the cochlear outer hair cells (sensory organ). A “pass” indicates that hearing is functional to the level of …

Implementation of Universal Adolescent Depression Screening: Quality Improvement Outcomes

Introduction Despite the increasing incidence of adolescent depression, suicide and evidence-based recommendations for adolescent depression screening, 70% of teens report not discussing depression with their provider. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve the identification and management of adolescent depression by implementing a practice-based, universal depression screening. Method The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 modified for Adolescents was implemented during annual wellness visits for adolescents aged 12–18 years over 3 months. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to determine a change in the rates of depression screening, depression diagnoses, referrals to mental health, and pharmaceutical treatment of depression. Results Pre/postimplementation data were compared. Documented adolescent depression screening increased from 0% to 74.5%. Increased rates of diagnosed depression (12.1%), mental health referrals (8%), and pharmaceutical treatment of depression (4.9%) were clinically and statistically significant. Discussion Adopting evidence-based recommendations for universal depression screening in pediatric primary care can improve the early diagnosis and management of adolescent depression. Despite the increasing incidence of adolescent depression, suicide and evidence-based recommendations for adolescent depression screening, 70% of teens report not discussing depression with their provider. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve the identification and management of adolescent depression by implementing a practice-based, universal depression screening. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 modified for Adolescents was implemented during annual wellness visits for adolescents aged 12–18 years over 3 months. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to determine a change in the rates of depression screening, depression diagnoses, referrals to mental health, and pharmaceutical treatment of depression. Pre/postimplementation data were compared. Documented adolescent depression screening increased from 0% to 74.5%. Increased rates of diagnosed depression (12.1%), mental health referrals (8%), and pharmaceutical treatment of depression (4.9%) were clinically and statistically significant. Adopting evidence-based recommendations for universal depression screening in pediatric primary care can improve the early diagnosis and management of adolescent depression. Jeff Bose, Nurse Practitioner, Kiddie West Pediatric Center, Columbus, OH. Rosie Zeno, Assistant Professor of Clinical Nursing and Director of MS in Nursing Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Barbara Warren, Professor of Clinical Nursing and Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Across the Lifespan Specialty Track Director, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Loraine T. Sinnott, Research Statistician, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Elizabeth A. Fitzgerald, Associate Professor of Clinical Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Identifying Adolescent Suicide Risk via Depression Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: An Electronic Health Record Review.

The authors evaluated suicide risk rates detected via a depression screener administered within a large pediatric primary care system and examined 1-year follow-up care after adolescents' endorsement of suicide risk. Retrospective electronic health record data were extracted to examine both suicide risk rates from items endorsed on the Patient Health Questionnaire-Modified for Teens (PHQ-9-M) and primary care providers' (PCPs') follow-up suicide risk assessments on the day of depression screening among adolescents ages 12-18 years during the period of September 1, 2014, to August 31, 2016. Manual chart review was conducted, and charts were coded for several follow-up care actions (e.g., referral to behavioral health providers and provision of crisis line information) in the year after suicidality endorsement. In a sample of 12,690 adolescents, 5.1% endorsed thoughts of death or self-harm, 3.6% reported a lifetime suicide attempt, and 2.4% endorsed serious suicidal ideation within the past month. Manual chart review of a stratified random subsample of 150 of the 643 adolescents who endorsed a lifetime suicide attempt, serious ideation in the past month, or both illustrated the types of follow-up care they received. The PCPs adhered to the system's suicide assessment questions with high fidelity. Follow-up care from PCPs and other providers during the year after suicide risk endorsement was more variable. Findings demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating suicide assessment procedures into depression screening in pediatric primary care and highlight avenues for maximizing preventive care for adolescents at increased risk for suicide.

What Caregivers Want: Preferences for Behavioral Health Screening Implementation Procedures in Pediatric Primary Care.

There has been a national push for universal psychosocial prevention screening in pediatric primary care. Implementation science highlights the importance of considering patients' perspectives when developing such procedures; however, minimal studies have examined this. The present study employed a mixed-methods design to examine caregivers of pediatric patients' (n = 149) preferences and comfort with psychosocial screening procedures. A subset of participants (n = 20) were interviewed to better understand reasons for responses. Results indicated that caregivers rated screening for physical health, development, emotion and behavior, caregiver adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), and child ACEs within primary care as important or very important. The majority of caregivers were not comfortable completing screenings in the waiting room and preferred the exam room. Caregivers primarily preferred the primary care provider to administer screenings and communicate results and recommendations. Parents also preferred the behavioral health provider to provide recommendations on emotion and behavior, parent ACEs, and child ACEs. Qualitative reasons for responses included relationship quality, knowledge of child, expertise, and desire for direct communication. Findings have implications for developing family-centered, trauma-informed practices within primary care, particularly among those within under-resourced rural communities.

Sex-based differences in screening and recognition of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes in pediatric primary care.

Risk-based screening for type 2 diabetes (T2D) in youth with overweight/obesity is recommended, but rates remain low in practice. Identification of factors impacting provider ordering and patient completion of testing may guide strategies to improve screening. To evaluate predictors of hemoglobin A1c (A1c)-based T2D screening in pediatric primary care. This retrospective cohort study included 10 to 18 year-old patients with overweight/obesity (body mass index [BMI] Z-score ≥1.04) followed in a large academic-affiliated pediatric primary care network, 2009 to 2018. Percentages of patients with ordered and completed A1c were determined, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate independent predictors of screening. 34 927 (48.0% female; 52.5% with BMI Z-score ≥1.64) youth followed for a median of 3.0 years were included. 21% (7457) of patients had screening ordered and 14% (4966) completed screening during follow-up. In multivariable regression, after controlling for race/ethnicity, BMI, family history of diabetes and age, males were significantly less likely to have ordered screening, but were equally or more likely to complete screening if ordered. Male adolescents were less likely to undergo A1c-based T2D screening due to differential ordering practices. The source of this differential practice should be pursued to avoid under-recognition of cardiometabolic risk in at-risk male youth.

Is COVID-19 an adverse childhood experience (ACE): Implications for screening for primary care

The report by DiGangi et al supports the feasibility of primary-care screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in pediatric primary care, however, significant controversy persists about the wisdom and clinical utility of implementing universal screening in pediatric primary care. In fact, many experts suggest that universal ACEs screening may introduce more harm than good. Instead, the study's findings provide an opportunity to raise awareness. Such a high prevalence of ACEs among children carries practical implications for primary care and public policy (https://www.acesaware.org/treat/clinical-assessment-treatment-planning/).

Social Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Anticipates Acute Care Utilization.

The aim of the study was to assess whether responses to a standardized social risk screen administered during pediatric well-child visits (WCV) were associated with emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) utilization. This was a retrospective cohort study of 26,509 children younger than 13 years with a WCV between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. Exposure was positive response(s) on a standardized social risk screening questionnaire at the index WCV. Primary outcome was number of ED or UC visits in the 12 months after the WCV. The cohort was 50.9% male and 65.7% black, with a median age of 3.6 years. More than 20% had a positive response to at least one question on the social risk screen. For those reporting any social risk, 46.7% had 1 or more EDs or UC visit within 12 months. Each additional reported risk was associated with a 4% increase in the rate of ED utilization (incidence rate ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.07) and a 16% increase in the rate of hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.08-1.24). Similar patterns were noted for those visiting the ED 4 times or more (adjusted odds ratio = 1.09, 1.03-1.15) and hospitalization 2 times or more (adjusted odds ratio = 1.19, 1.04-1.35) in the year after the WCV. Those who screened positive on food insecurity, safety, and desire to meet with a social worker questions also had higher odds of ED or UC utilization. Families reporting a social concern on a standardized screen during a WCV had increased acute care utilization in the subsequent year. Identifying socially at-risk families may allow for the creation of more effective strategies to prevent future utilization.

How an Electronic Medical Record System Facilitates and Demonstrates Effective Psychosocial Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.

Using questionnaires, administrative claims, and chart review data, the current study explored the impact of using an electronic medical record system to administer, score, and store the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17) during annual pediatric well-child visits. Within a sample of 1773 Medicaid-insured outpatients, the electronic system demonstrated that 90.5% of cases completed a PSC-17 screen electronically, billing codes indicating a screen was administered agreed with the existence of a questionnaire in the chart in 98.8% of cases, the classification of risk based on PSC-17 scores agreed with the classification of risk based on the Current Procedural Terminology code modifiers in 72.9% of cases, and 90.0% of clinicians' progress notes mentioned PSC-17 score in treatment planning. Using an electronic approach to psychosocial screening in pediatrics facilitated the use of screening information gathered during the clinical visit and allowed for enhanced tracking of outcomes and quality monitoring.