Screening For Primary Aldosteronism Research Articles

Comparing ARR Versus Suppressed PRA as Screening Tests for Primary Aldosteronism.

In many practices, the screening for primary aldosteronism relies on a single-blood draw for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) to establish an aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). ARR levels vary between expert centers and repeated assays in the same individual, emphasizing the potential variability of this screening approach. A suppressed PRA to <1 ng/mL per h has been proposed as an alternative test to the ARR. We compared 2 potential screening approaches to identify probable primary aldosteronism (ARR≥30 or ARR≥20 versus PRA suppressed below 1 ng/mL per h) in a cohort of 94 829 paired PRA and PAC samples submitted by clinicians to evaluate the presence of primary aldosteronism. Of 94 829 patients, 20.3% tested positive based on ARR≥20 (95% CI, 20.0%-20.5%), 13.9% based on ARR≥30 (95% CI, 13.6%-14.1%), versus 45.9% based on suppressed PRA (<1 ng/mL per minute [95% CI, 45.5%-46.2%]). In the PRA group, a range of aldosterone levels was observed: 5.5% had PAC >15 ng/dL, 25.2% had PAC 5 to 15 ng/dL, and 15.2% had PAC <5 ng/dL, compared with 6%, 12.7%, and 1.6% in the ARR≥20 group and 4.7%, 8.5%, and 0.7% in the ARR≥30 group. In this cohort of individuals being screened for primary aldosteronism, substantially more individuals were identified using criteria focused on suppression of renin activity compared with using the aldosterone renin ratio as a screening tool.

Association between papillary thyroid cancer and primary aldosteronism in individuals with hypertension.

Aldosterone excess chronically induces oxidative stress and cell proliferation. Previously, a single study investigated primary aldosteronism (PA) in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), albeit without a matched control group. We conducted a propensity score matched case-control study to investigate the association between PA and PTC in individuals with arterial hypertension (HT). PA was investigated in 137 patients with PTC and HT. The control group included 137 (1:1) age, sex-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched individuals with HT. We conducted a secondary analysis in which the controls were also matched according to HT stage. The prevalence of PA was 29.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.91%-37.68%) in the PTC group and 20.44% (95% CI, 14.22%-28.35%) in the controls not matched for HT stage (p = 0.093). Although the PA prevalence was similar in both groups, the frequency of severe HT (stage III or resistant) was significantly lower in the PTC group (23%) compared to the hypertensive controls (73%, p < 0.001). After matching the controls by HT stage, the prevalence of PA in the PTC group was significantly higher compared to the hypertensive controls (9.56%; 95% CI, 5.39%-16.1%, p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, PTC was independently associated with PA in both unmatched hypertensive individuals (odds ratio [OR] 4.74; 95% CI, 2.26-10.55; p< 0.001) and in those matched for HT stage (OR 5.88, 95% CI, 2.79-13.37; p< 0.001). PTC was an independent variable associated with a diagnosis of PA in hypertensive individuals. Therefore, we propose the association between PTC and HT as a new recommendation for PA screening regardless of HT severity.

Extra cut-off value of aldosterone-to-renin ratio for screening primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) and diabetes mellitus (DM) may coexist. We previously found that DM and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) may decrease the efficiency of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) for screening PA. Thus, we wanted to determine appropriate ARR cut-off values for screening PA in patients with hypertension with DM and IGT. Data from 736 patients with hypertension were collected. They were divided into PA (77 cases), PA with DM (27 cases), PA with IGT (44 cases), hypertension without PA (353 cases), hypertension with DM (without PA, 127 cases), and hypertension with IGT (without PA, 108 cases). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the appropriate ARR cut-off values in different conditions. Screening efficiencies of these cut-off values were evaluated across different groups. ARR cut-off values for screening PA in hypertensive patients without DM and IGT, with DM, and with IGT were 29.65, 23.15, and 26.9, respectively. All cut-off values demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity: 92.2% and 88.7%, 92.6% and 79.5%, and 88.6% and 85.2%, respectively, and areas under the ROC curves were 0.941, 0.904, and 0.909, respectively. Our results suggest that extra ARR cut-off values may be necessary for effective screening PA in hypertensive patients with DM and IGT, particularly in those with DM.

Primary Aldosteronism and Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes: Genome-Wide Association and Mendelian Randomization Study.

Observational studies have reported associations between primary aldosteronism (PA) and cardiovascular outcomes, including coronary artery diseases (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and stroke. However, establishing causality remains a challenge due to the lack of randomized controlled trial data on this topic. We thus aimed to investigate the causal relationship between PA and the risk of developing CAD, CHF, and stroke. Cross-ancestry meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies combining East Asian and European ancestry (1560 PA cases and 742 139 controls) was conducted to identify single-nucleotide variants that are associated with PA. Then, using the identified genetic variants as instrumental variables, we conducted the 2-sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the causal relationship between PA and incident CAD, CHF, and stroke among both East Asian and European ancestry. Summary association results were extracted from large genome-wide association studies consortia. Our cross-ancestry meta-analysis of East Asian and European populations identified 7 genetic loci significantly associated with the risk of PA, for which the genes nearest to the lead variants were CASZ1, WNT2B, HOTTIP, LSP1, TBX3, RXFP2, and NDP. Among the East Asian population, the pooled odds ratio estimates using these 7 genetic instruments of PA were 1.07 (95% CI, 1.03-1.11) for CAD, 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.20) for CHF, and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.09-1.18) for stroke. The results were consistent among the European population. Our 2-sample Mendelian randomization study revealed that PA had increased risks of CAD, CHF, and stroke. These findings highlight that early and active screening of PA is critical to prevent future cardiovascular events.

Steroidomics-Based Screening for Primary Aldosteronism: Impact of antihypertensive Drugs.

Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is complicated by the need to withdraw antihypertensive medications that interfere with test results, particularly renin. This study examined whether machine learning-based steroid-probability scores offer a renin measurement-independent approach for testing less prone to interference than the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). This prospective multicenter cohort study involved the use of plasma steroidomics and the ARR in 839 patients tested for PA, including 190 with and 578 without PA (71 indeterminate). Receiver operating characteristic curves for steroid-probability scores and the ARR were examined with and without interfering medications. Impacts of individual medications on plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, 18-hydroxycortisol, steroid-probability scores, renin, and ARRs were examined by multivariable and paired analyses in patients with and without PA. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated a significant impact of interfering antihypertensive medications on the diagnostic performance of the ARR and minimal impact on steroid-probability scores. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists increased plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol in patients without PA and resulted in false-positive test results for steroid-probability scores and false-negative results for the ARR. Diuretics increased aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and steroid-probability scores in patients without PA, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreased aldosterone, steroid-probability scores, and ARRs. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers had negligible impact on mineralocorticoids and steroid-probability scores. Among antihypertensive drugs that impact plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists stood out as a cause of false-positive results for derived steroid-probability scores. Other antihypertensives have minimal or no impact, an advantage for use of steroid-probability scores over the ARR when those medications cannot be withdrawn. URL: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017084; Unique identifier: DRKS00017084.

Primary aldosteronism prevalence enhanced by strict adherence to 2016 Endocrine Society guidelines: insights from an endocrine hypertension unit.

Primary aldosteronism is the most frequent cause of hypertension although is undetected. The 2016 Endocrine Society guidelines (2016-ESG) recommendations for primary aldosteronism detection are unfulfilled. We aimed to ascertain the prevalence of primary aldosteronism, following the screening criteria endorsed by the 2016-ESG. All adult patients tested for primary aldosteronism at an endocrine hypertension unit of a tertiary hospital during 2021-2023 were studied. Primary aldosteronism investigation was performed when at least one reason for its screening based on 2016-ESG was detected. When screening was positive, confirmatory tests were executed. Rates and diagnostic accuracy of the reasons for primary aldosteronism screening were analyzed. Two hundred and sixty-five patients were included. Mean age was 55 ± 14 years, 124 of 265 (46.8%) were women, 24.6% had hypokalemia, and 16% adrenal incidentaloma(s) as indication for screening. Primary aldosteronism was diagnosed in 122 of 265 (46%). The presence of each reason for primary aldosteronism screening increased the probability of primary aldosteronism in 2.2-fold [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63 to 2.97; P < 0.001]. The most frequent reason for primary aldosteronism screening was a blood pressure at least 150/100 mmHg on three measurements on different days, and had a sensitivity of 95%. Hypertension with spontaneous or diuretic-induced hypokalemia was the most specific reason (87.5%) but was not frequent. Adrenal incidentaloma(s) was not associated with primary aldosteronism diagnosis. Primary aldosteronism prevalence is markedly high when the 2016-ESG recommendations are rigorously implemented. The greater the number of indications for primary aldosteronism investigation, the higher its prevalence. Further studies are needed to corroborate this observed primary aldosteronism prevalence.

Elderly men are underscreened for primary aldosteronism even in Hypertension Excellence Centre

Purpose The Endocrine Society (ES) guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) in high risk hypertensive patients presenting with at least one of seven criteria (resistant HTN, hypokalaemia, adrenal nodule, etc.) Although guidelines are clear and screening is simple, compliance rates among clinicians are extremely low. This results in underdiagnosis of early disease, leading to cadiovasculaer complications and the extra-burden of advanced chronic kidney disease. We aimed to evaluate the screening rates in our Nephrology and Hypertension clinics, as an example of a dedicated Hypertension Excellence Centre. Materials and methods Data on adult hypertensive patients was retrieved from January 2018 to December 2020. Included in the study were hypertensive patients who had at least one of the ES criteria for PA screening. Of all suitable patients, we compared those who were screened for PA to patients who were not screened. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were used for comparison between groups. Results Of 661 patients with HTN, 218 patients (33%) met the ES guidelines for PA screening. Forty-six of them (21.1%) were referred for screening. Advanced age and male gender were associated with lower screening referral rates. Odds ratio for age was 0.945 for every year (95% CI 0.915 − 0.975). There was a trend towards decreased referral rate in advanced kidney disease. Conclusions A 21% screening rate, suggests that many cases of PA are likely missed, more often in older patients. We therefore advocate for PA screening of all hypertensive patients, especially elderly patients with CKD, in whom clinicians’ awareness is low but the absolute risk is high.

Screening for primary aldosteronism in primary care: a scoping review.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common treatable and potentially curable cause of secondary hypertension. Prompt diagnosis and management by primary care physicians (PCPs) is important given the increased risk of cardiovascular complications however screening rates are low in primary care. Our aim was to identify factors that influence screening behaviour for PA among PCPs. A rigorous scoping review of seven databases between 16/08/22 and 09/08/23 was used to investigate PA screening practices. Articles written in English from peer-reviewed literature within the last 20 years were eligible for inclusion if an aspect of their study was conducted in primary care. A total of 1380 titles and abstracts, and 61 full texts were screened, with 20 studies selected for data extraction. We identified three broad categories of factors influencing screening by PCPs-the patient, the clinician, and the healthcare system. Some studies targeted these factors to improve screening rates although there is little data on implementation and outcomes. Low awareness, inadequate guidelines, and poor access to testing were identified as key barriers to PA screening. Targeted education sessions for PCPs, clear guidelines, and closer proximity to diagnostic centres may be required to improve PA detection in primary care.

#357 Sex differences in the aldosterone-renin system must be taken into account during screening for primary aldosteronism

Abstract Background and Aims Primary aldosteronism (PA) is one of the most frequent causes of secondary hypertension. Patients with PA are at higher risk for cardiovascular and renal complications than those with essential hypertension. Screening for PA is rarely considered in the assessment of a hypertensive patient, in part because of difficulties in the diagnostic process. Nevertheless, identification of PA is crucial to guide patients towards optimal management, either by mineralocorticoid receptor blockade or by unilateral adrenalectomy, with the latter offering potential cure for patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs). Numerous studies show inadequate diagnostic accuracy of the aldosterone:renin ratio (ARR) for screening for PA, particularly in females, who have higher ARR variability and lower renin compared to males. Women have a higher risk of false-positive screening results leading to unnecessary confirmatory tests. Use of oral contraception (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may also confound the ARR. The aim of this study was to develop improved screening tools for PA, including adjustments for sex-specific differences. Method PROSALDO is a multicenter prospective cohort study designed to test new diagnostic procedures for patients with suspected PA. Medication that interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are withdrawn before laboratory measurements. For screening, the routine ARR is calculated along with additional probability scores based on a peripheral venous steroid hormone profile (PVSP). The latter allows for identification of potentially false-negative ARR results. After a positive screening result of the ARR and/or a high probability score based on the PVSP, PA is confirmed or excluded with a saline infusion test (SIT). PA confirmation is followed by adrenal venous sampling (AVS) to identify patients with unilateral PA. We compared aldosterone, renin and ARR levels between females and males with and without PA. Renin- and sex dependent formulas for aldosterone screening cut-offs were derived from the study population. Logistic regression and the corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine and compare diagnostic accuracies. Results PA was confirmed in 159 (24.5%) of 649 (328 (50.5%) females and 321 (49.5%) males). Lateralization was shown in 58 out of 117 patients who underwent AVS. In hypertensive patients without PA, ARR was higher in females vs. males (26.4 vs. 11.7 pmol/mU, P &amp;lt; 0.0001), mainly due to a lower renin (9.2 vs. 16.2 mU/L, P &amp;lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, ARRs in patients with vs. without PA showed more overlap in females compared to males. Areas under ROC curves (AUROCs) for the ARR were 0.857 (CI 95%: 0.797-0.902) vs. 0.912 (CI 95%: 0.876-0.938) for females and males respectively. Using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry measurements (LC-MS/MS) of aldosterone, an ARR cut-off of 21.75 pmol/L yielded a sensitivity of 93% with only 45% specificity in females, while for males, a specificity of 66% was obtained for a sensitivity of 97.7%. This meant for females having a higher risk of false-positive screening results (OR 2.36 (CI 95%: 1.65-3.41)), even after excluding patients on OC or HRT (OR 2.17 (CI 95%: 1.5-3.17)). We derived a renin- and sex-dependent formula for the calculation of aldosterone cut-offs, which improved diagnostic accuracy for both males and females (ΔAUROC = 0.05 and 0.045, P &amp;lt; 0.0001 and 0.02 respectively): for a diagnostic sensitivity of 94-95%, specificity was improved to 61% in females and 82% in males. Conclusion Lower renin in females without PA leads to higher ARRs and thus a higher risk of false-positive screening results. Higher overlap of the ARR between females with and without PA compared to their male counterparts weakens utility of the ARR for discrimination of patients with and without PA. Sex- and renin-specific aldosterone cut-offs for screening for PA offer improved diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy remains however superior in males, which highlights the need for further optimization of diagnostic procedures specifically in women.

Comparison between screening for primary aldosteronism with and without drug adjustment

Objective Few studies have evaluated the performance of non-drug-adjusted primary aldosteronism (PA) screening. Therefore, we aimed to examine the consistency between PA screening results with and without drug adjustment and to explore the effectiveness of screening without drug adjustment. Methods This prospective study included 650 consecutive patients with a high risk of incidence PA. Patients who initially screened positive underwent rescreening with drug adjustments and confirmatory tests. Regarding the remaining patients, one of every three consecutive patients underwent rescreening with drug adjustments and confirmatory tests. The changes in aldosterone and renin concentrations were compared between patients with essential hypertension (EH) and those with PA before and after drug adjustment. Sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the diagnostic performance of screening without drug adjustment, using the confirmatory test results as the reference. Results We screened 650 patients with hypertension for PA. Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with PA and 195 with EH. Regarding drugs, 519 patients were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), or diuretics alone or in combination. Forty-one patients were taking beta-blockers. Ninety patients were taking beta-blockers in combination with other drugs. In patients treated with ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, or diuretics alone, or in combination, or beta-blockers alone, PA positivity was determined using the criteria, aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) >38 pg/mL/pg/mL and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) >100 pg/mL, and negativity, using the criteria, ARR <9 pg/mL/pg/mL; the sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 94.5%, respectively. After drug adjustment, the sensitivity and specificity of screening were 92.1% and 89%, respectively. Conclusions In patients not treated with beta-blockers combined with others, when ARR >38 pg/mL/pg/mL and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) >100 pg/mL, or, ARR <9 pg/mL/pg/mL, non-drug-adjusted screening results were identical to with drug adjustment. Non-drug-adjusted screening could reduce the chance of medication adjustment, enable patients to continue their treatments and avoiding adverse effects, is of clinical importance.

EXPLORATION OF SCREENING FOR PRIMARY ALDOSTERONISM BY IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY IN PATIENTS WITH ADRENAL SURGERY IN CHINESE

Objective: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is common secondary hypertension, however, the screening rate for PA is not entirely satisfactory. This study aimed to use immunohistochemical staining for retrospective analysis of screening for PA in patients with adrenal surgery in Chinese to improve the screening rate of PA. Design and method: A total of 101 patients who were diagnosed with adrenal tumors and treated with adrenalectomy were collected. Immunohistochemical staining for anti-CYP11B1 and anti-CYP11B2 monoclonal antibodies was performed on postoperative specimens. Analysis of staining results according to the expert consensus on the histopathology of PA. Results: Of the 101 patients included, 25 (24.75%) patients had completed secondary hypertension screening before surgery. Of the remaining 76 (75.25%) patients, immunohistochemical staining was identified in 13 patients (12.87%) with PA and 4 patients (3.96%) with autonomous secretion of cortisol. Only APM or MAPM was seen in 42 patients (41.58%). APM and MAPM were used as a potential diagnostic basis leading to PA, and functional lesions were observed in postoperative pathology in 83.17% of patients. Still, 16.83% of patients did not show clear functional histopathology on pathological staining. The overall incidence of APM and MAPM was 64.36%. Increased prevalence of APM and MAPM in patients older than or equal to 50 years old compared to patients younger than 50 years old (67.14% versus. 58.06%) and in female patients compared to males (77.78% versus. 42.11%). There without a significant difference between different ages (χ2 = 0.772, P = 0.380) but there was a significant difference between genders (χ2 = 13.149, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: The screening rate of PA before adrenalectomy was less than 1/4. More than 40% of patients had pathologically confirmed APM or MAPM without systematic PA screening. Meanwhile, 16.83% of patients undergoing adrenal surgery had no clear functional histopathological manifestations. The problem of inadequate screening for PA still exists. Immunohistochemistry by anti-CYP11B1 and anti-CYP11B2 monoclonal antibodies is an important tool in the pathological diagnosis of PA and will help identify potential autonomous secretion of aldosterone and guide improved screening for PA.

Insight into the status of plasma renin and aldosterone measurement: findings from 526 clinical laboratories in China.

Accurate measurements of renin and aldosterone levels play an important role in primary aldosteronism screening, which is of great importance in the management and categorization of hypertension. The objective of this studyis to investigate the current status of plasma renin and aldosterone measurements in China, which is achieved by analyzing the results of 526 clinical laboratories nationwide for three pooled fresh plasma samples derived from more than 2,000 patients. Renin and aldosterone in three pooled plasma samples were measured four times in 526 laboratories employing various measurement systems. The inter- and intra-laboratory %CV were calculated and compared. To determine the source of the substantial inter-laboratory %CV,laboratories were categorized according to the measurement systems they are using, and both the inter- and intra-measurement-system %CV were calculated and compared. Regarding renin, the majority of laboratories use four primary commercial immunoassays. However, for aldosterone, in addition to commercial immunoassays, laboratory-developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods are also used by laboratories. The median values of intra-laboratory %CVs, intra-measurement-system %CVs, inter-laboratory %CVs, and inter-measurement systems %CVs varied between 1.6 and 2.6 %, 4.6 and 14.9 %, 8.3 and 25.7 %, and 10.0 and 34.4 % for renin, respectively. For aldosterone, these values ranged from 1.4 to 2.2 %, 2.5-14.7 %, 9.9-31.0 %, and 10.0-35.5 %, respectively. The precision within laboratories and measurement systems for plasma renin and aldosterone measurements is satisfactory. However, the comparability between laboratories using different measurement systems remains lacking, indicating the long way to achieve standardization and harmonization for these two analytes.

Best Practice Alert to Promote Screening for Primary Aldosteronism Among People With Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension

ObjectiveGuidelines recommend screening all individuals with resistant hypertension for primary aldosteronism (PA) but less than 2% are screened. We aimed to develop a noninterruptive Best Practice Alert (BPA) to assess if its implementation in the electronic health record improved PA screening rates among individuals with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). MethodsWe implemented a noninterruptive BPA on 9/17/2022 at our ambulatory primary care, endocrinology, nephrology, and cardiology clinics. We assessed clinical parameters of people with aTRH before (9/17/2021-9/16/2022) and after (9/17/2022-9/16/2023) the BPA was implemented. The noninterruptive BPA embedded with an order set identified people with aTRH and recommended screening for PA if it was not previously performed. ResultsThere were 10 944 and 11 463 people with aTRH who attended office visits during the 12 months before and after the BPA implementation, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in median age (P = .096), sex (P = .577), race (P = .753), and ethnicity (P = .472) between the pre- and post-BPA implementation groups. There was a significant increase in PA screening orders placed (227 [2.1%] vs 476 [4.2%], P < .001) and PA screening labs performed (169 [1.5%] vs 382 [3.3, P < .001) after BPA implementation. PA screening tests were positive in 26% (44/169) and 23% (88/382) of people in the pre- and post-BPA groups, respectively (P = .447). ConclusionImplementation of a real-time electronic health record BPA doubled the screening rate for PA among people with aTRH; however, the overall screening rate was low.

Screening for Primary Aldosteronism by Mass Spectrometry Versus Immunoassay Measurements of Aldosterone: A Prospective Within-Patient Study.

Measurements of aldosterone by mass spectrometry are more accurate and less prone to interferences than immunoassay measurements, and may produce a more accurate aldosterone:renin ratio (ARR) when screening for primary aldosteronism (PA). Differences in diagnostic performance of the ARR using mass spectrometry vs immunoassay measurements of aldosterone were examined in 710 patients screened for PA. PA was confirmed in 153 patients and excluded in 451 others. Disease classifications were not achieved in 106 patients. Areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROC) and other measures were used to compare diagnostic performance. Mass spectrometry-based measurements yielded lower plasma aldosterone concentrations than immunoassay measurements. For the ARR based on immunoassay measurements of aldosterone, AUROCs were slightly lower (P = 0.018) than those using mass spectrometry measurements (0.895 vs 0.906). The cutoff for the ARR to reach a sensitivity of 95% was 30 and 21.5 pmol/mU by respective immunoassay and mass spectrometry-based measurements, which corresponded to specificities of 57% for both. With data restricted to patients with unilateral PA, diagnostic sensitivities of 94% with specificities >81% could be achieved at cutoffs of 68 and 52 pmol/mU for respective immunoassay and mass spectrometry measurements. Mass spectrometry-based measurements of aldosterone for the ARR provide no clear diagnostic advantage over immunoassay-based measurements. Both approaches offer limited diagnostic accuracy for the ARR as a screening test. One solution is to employ the higher cutoffs to triage patients likely to have unilateral PA for further tests and possible adrenalectomy, while using the lower cutoffs to identify others for targeted medical therapy.German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00017084.

Testing for Primary Hyperaldosteronism in Resistant Essential Hypertensive Patients

Background: Hypertension is a common condition that affects many people all over the world. It could be associated with several complications especially in cases of resistant hypertension. Many clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism especially in persons with resistant hypertension owing to the worse prognosis when compared with blood pressure-matched essential hypertension. Objective: The study aimed to screen for primary aldosteronism in high-risk hypertensive Egyptian patients, and to determine the challenges faced in the diagnosis. Material and methods: 50 high-risk hypertensive patients were recruited from the Outpatient Endocrinology Clinic out of 200 hypertensive patients in the period from February 2019 and April 2021. Creatinine, Glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1c), lipid profile, potassium level, sodium level, Plasma Aldosterone Concentration (PAC), Active Renin Concentration (ARC), and aldosterone/ Renin Ratio (ARR) were assessed in all patients. Results: A series of 50 hypertensive patients screened for PA (26 females and 24 males) with a mean age of 41.88±11.91 SD. We found that 41(82%) patients were receiving antihypertensive medications and 9(18%) patients didn’t receive treatment for hypertension previously. 9(18%) patients kept on no treatment, 6(12%) patients were kept on the same anti-hypertensive medications, and 35(70%) of them were shifted to other anti-hypertensive drugs. 4 patients out of total 50 patients had a positive ARR (&gt;46), while 13(26%) patients out of total 50 hypertensive patients had low renin levels. There was a statistically significant relation between serum Aldosterone/ Renin Ratio (ARR) and serum Potassium (K) with P-value=0.001 (Figure 4), also a statistically significant relation between serum aldosterone/ renin ratio (ARR) and (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) with P-value=0.001 was found. Conclusion: We recommend routine screening for PA in high-risk hypertensive patients that could offer targeted treatment before adverse cardiovascular consequences develop.

Development of a diagnostic model for pre-washout screening of primary aldosteronism

PurposePrimary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis is affected by antihypertensive drugs that are commonly taken by patients with suspected PA. In this study, we developed and validated a diagnostic model for screening PA without drug washout.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1095 patients diagnosed with PA or essential hypertension. Patients were randomly grouped into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. Baseline characteristics, plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), and direct renin concentration (DRC) before and after drug washout were separately recorded, and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) was calculated.ResultsPAC and ARR were higher and direct renin concentration was lower in patients with PA than in patients with essential hypertension. Furthermore, the differences in blood potassium and sodium concentrations and hypertension grades between the two groups were significant. Using the abbreviations potassium (P), ARR (A), PAC (P), sodium (S), and hypertension grade 3 (3), the model was named PAPS3. The PAPS3 model had a maximum score of 10, with the cutoff value assigned as 5.5; it showed high sensitivity and specificity for screening PA in patients who exhibit difficulty in tolerating drug washout.ConclusionPA screening remains crucial, and standard guidelines should be followed for patients to tolerate washout. The PAPS3 model offers an alternative to minimize risks and enhance diagnostic efficiency in PA for those facing washout challenges. Despite its high accuracy, further validation of this model is warranted through large-scale clinical studies.

Performance of aldosterone-to-renin ratio before washout of antihypertensive drugs in screening of primary aldosteronism.

The aim of this study is to evaluate performance of aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) before washout of antihypertensive drugs as a screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients suspected of having secondary hypertension during a period from January 2017 to May 2022 at authors' institute. For inclusion in the final analysis, ARR must be available prior to as well as after discontinuation of antihypertensives. Patients with ARR ≥2.4(ng/dL)/(μIU/mL) after washout proceeded to confirmatory tests. Diagnosis of PA was established based on positive result of the confirmatory test. Diagnostic accuracy of ARR prior to the washout in predicting PA are shown as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The analysis included a total of 1306 patients [median age of 50.2 (41.0-59.0) years, 64.0% male]. Confirmatory tests showed PA in 215(16.5%) patients and essential hypertension (EH) in the remaining 1091(83.5%) patients. In comparison to the second screening test, the first screening test (before washout of antihypertensives) yielded lower plasma aldosterone and higher renin, and consequently lower ARR in both the PA and EH groups. At a cutoff of 0.7(ng/dL)/(μIU/ml), ARR before washout had 96.3% sensitivity, 61.2% specificity, 0.33 PPV and 0.99 NPV. At a lower cutoff of 0.5(ng/dL)/(μIU/ml), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV are 97.7%, 52.0%, 0.29 and 0.99. ARR prior to washout of antihypertensives is a sensitive screening test for PA. Washout of antihypertensives could be omitted and further investigation for PA is not warranted if ARR was ≤ 0.7(ng/dL)/(μIU/ml) before washout.

Optimizing the aldosterone-to-renin ratio cut-off for screening primary aldosteronism based on cardiovascular risk: a collaborative study

ABSTRACT Objectives Aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) based screening is the first step in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, the guideline-recommended ARR cutoff covers a wide range, from the equivalent of 1.3 to 4.9 ng·dl−1/mIU∙l−1. We aimed to optimize the ARR cutoff for PA screening based on the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Methods Longitudinally, we included hypertensive participants from the Framingham Offspring Study (FOS) who attended the sixth examination cycle and followed up until 2014. At baseline (1995–1998), we used circulating concentrations of aldosterone and renin to calculate ARR (unit: ng·dl−1/mIU∙l−1) among 1,433 subjects who were free of CVD. We used spline regression to calculate the ARR threshold based on the incident CVD. We used cross-sectional data from the Chongqing Primary Aldosteronism Study (CONPASS) to explore whether the ARR cutoff selected from FOS is applicable to PA screening. Results In FOS, CVD risk increased with an increasing ARR until a peak of ARR 1.0, followed by a plateau in CVD risk (hazard ratio 1.49, 95%CI 1.19–1.86). In CONPASS, when compared to essential hypertension with ARR < 1.0, PA with ARR ≥ 1.0 carried a higher CVD risk (odds ratio 2.24, 95%CI 1.41–3.55), while essential hypertension with ARR ≥ 1.0 had an unchanged CVD risk (1.02, 0.62–1.68). Setting ARR cutoff at 2.4 ~ 4.9, 10% ~30% of PA subjects would be unrecognized although they carried a 2.45 ~ 2.58-fold higher CVD risk than essential hypertension. Conclusions The CVD risk-based optimal ARR cutoff is 1.0 ng·dl−1/mIU∙l−1 for PA screening. The current guideline-recommended ARR cutoff may miss patients with PA and high CVD risk. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03224312)

Comparison of plasma aldosterone measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in screening test for primary aldosteronism

BackgroundWhether chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) measurement can be used interchangeably in primary aldosteronism (PA) screening is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare CLIA to LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement in PA screening. MethodsAll participants underwent aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) testing. PA was diagnosed by captopril challenge test or saline infusion test. PAC in screening test was measured with CLIA and LC-MS/MS. Plasma direct renin concentration in screening and confirmatory test was measured with CLIA. The concordance between CLIA and LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement in PA screening was analyzed. ResultsTwenty-one healthy volunteers, 61 patients with essential hypertension (EH) and 43 PA patients were enrolled. Median PAC by CLIA was 84.7 % higher than that by LC-MS/MS in screening test (P < 0.001). A positive correlation of PAC was observed between the two assays (Pearson r coefficient 0.770, P < 0.001). When ARR was used in differentiating PA from EH, there was no difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between CLIA and LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement (0.968 vs 0.950, P = 0.249). ConclusionCLIA and LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement exhibited high and comparable efficacy in PA screening. CLIA is a reliable and feasible alternative in PA screening test.

Evaluation of a Best-Practice Advisory for Primary Aldosteronism Screening

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common cause of secondary hypertension and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Fewer than 2% to 4% of patients at risk are evaluated for PA. To develop and evaluate an electronic health record best-practice advisory (BPA) that assists with PA screening. This prospective quality improvement study was conducted at academic center outpatient clinics. Data analysis was performed between February and June 2023 and included adults with hypertension and at least 1 of the following: 4 or more current antihypertensive medications; hypokalemia; age younger than 35 years; or adrenal nodule(s). Patients previously tested for PA were excluded. A noninterruptive BPA was developed to trigger for PA screening candidates seen in outpatient setting by clinicians who treat hypertension. The BPA included an order set for PA screening and a link to results interpretation guidance. (1) The number of PA screening candidates identified by the BPA between October 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022; (2) the rates of PA screening; and (3) the BPA use patterns, stratified by physician specialty were assessed. Over 15 months, the BPA identified 14 603 unique candidates (mean [SD] age, 65.5 [16.9] years; 7300 women [49.9%]; 371 [2.5%] Asian, 2383 [16.3%] Black, and 11 225 [76.9%] White individuals) for PA screening, including 7028 (48.1%) with treatment-resistant hypertension, 6351 (43.5%) with hypokalemia, 1537 (10.5%) younger than 35 years, and 445 (3.1%) with adrenal nodule(s). In total, 2040 patients (14.0%) received orders for PA screening. Of these, 1439 patients (70.5%) completed the recommended screening within the system, and 250 (17.4%) had positive screening results. Most screening orders were placed by internists (40.0%) and family medicine physicians (28.1%). Family practitioners (80.3%) and internists (68.9%) placed most orders via the embedded order set, while specialists placed most orders (83.0%-95.4%) outside the BPA. Patients who received screening were younger and included more women and Black patients than those not screened. The likelihood of screening was higher among patients with obesity and dyslipidemia and lower in those with chronic kidney disease and established cardiovascular complications. The study results suggest that noninterruptive BPAs are potentially promising PA screening-assistance tools, particularly among primary care physicians. Combined with artificial intelligence algorithms that optimize the detection yield, refined BPAs may contribute to personalized hypertension care.