Lynch Syndrome Screening Research Articles

One-stop Colon and Endometrial screening (OnCE): A prospective study of combined cancer screening for Lynch syndrome

One-stop Colon and Endometrial screening (OnCE): A prospective study of combined cancer screening for Lynch syndrome

Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch Syndrome and polygenic risk scores to inform colorectal cancer screening

PurposeGenomic screening to identify individuals with Lynch Syndrome (LS) and those with a high polygenic risk score (PRS) promises to personalize colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Understanding its clinical and economic impact is needed to inform screening guidelines and reimbursement policies. MethodsWe developed a Markov model to simulate individuals over a lifetime. We compared LS+PRS genomic screening with standard of care (SOC) for a cohort of US adults at age 30. The Markov model included health states of no CRC, CRC stages (A-D), and death. We estimated incidence, mortality, and discounted economic outcomes of the population under different interventions. ResultsScreening 1000 individuals for LS+PRS resulted in 1.36 fewer CRC cases and 0.65 fewer deaths compared with SOC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $124,415 per quality-adjusted life year; screening had a 69% probability of being cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/quality-adjusted life year . Setting the PRS threshold at the 90th percentile of the LS+PRS screening program to define individuals at high risk was most likely to be cost-effective compared with 95th, 85th, and 80th percentiles. ConclusionPopulation-level LS+PRS screening is marginally cost-effective, and a threshold of 90th percentile is more likely to be cost-effective than other thresholds.

Lynch syndrome screening in patients with young-onset extra-colorectal Lynch syndrome-associated cancers.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, which predisposes to various types of cancers showing deficient MMR (dMMR). Identification of LS probands is crucial to reduce cancer-related deaths in affected families. Although universal screening is recommended for colorectal and endometrial cancers, and age-restricted screening is proposed as an alternative, LS screening covering a broader spectrum of cancer types is needed. In the current study, we elucidated the rate of dMMR tumors and evaluated the outcome of LS screening in young-onset extra-colorectal LS-associated cancers. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins were retrospectively performed in a total of 309 tissue samples of endometrial, non-mucinous ovarian, gastric, urothelial, pancreatic, biliary tract, and adrenal cancers in patients < 50years of age. Clinicopathological information and the results of genetic testing were obtained from medical charts. There were 24 dMMR tumors (7.8%) including 18 endometrial, three ovarian, two urothelial, and one gastric cancer. Co-occurrence of colorectal cancer and family history of LS-associated cancers was significantly enriched in patients with dMMR tumors. Among the 16 patients with dMMR tumors who were informed of the immunohistochemistry results, five with endometrial and one with urothelial cancer were diagnosed as LS with positive pathogenic variants in MMR genes. We report the outcome of immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins performed in multiple types of young-onset extra-colorectal LS-associated cancers. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a comprehensive LS screening program incorporating young-onset patients with various types of extra-colorectal LS-associated cancers.

Development, Evaluation, and User Testing of a Decision-Making Toolkit to Promote Organizations to Implement Universal Tumor Screening for Lynch Syndrome

Introduction: The Implementing Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening (IMPULSS) study explained institutional variation in universal tumor screening (UTS) with the goal of identifying ways to aid organizational decision-makers in implementing and optimizing Lynch syndrome UTS programs. Methods: After applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 1.0) to analyze interviews with 66 stakeholders across 9 healthcare systems to develop a toolkit for implementation, we adapted the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) to assess toolkit potential to aid decision-making consistent with organizational values. We then conducted user testing with two experienced and four non-experienced implementers of UTS to improve the content and functionality of the toolkit and assess its acceptability and appropriateness. Results: Toolkit components were organized to address findings related to CFIR 1.0 constructs of evidence strength and quality, relative advantage, cost, engaging, planning, executing, and reflecting and evaluating. A home page was added to direct users to different sections based on whether they are deciding to implement UTS, planning for implementation, improving an existing UTS program, or considering a different approach to identify patients with Lynch syndrome. Upon initial evaluation, 31 of 64 IPDAS criteria were met by the original toolkit. All users rated the toolkit as acceptable and appropriate for assisting organizational decision-making and identified multiple areas for improvement. Numerous iterative changes were made to the toolkit, resulting in meeting 17 of the previously unmet IPDAS criteria. Conclusion: We demonstrate the rigorous development of a toolkit guided by the CFIR and show how user testing helped improve the toolkit to ensure it is acceptable, appropriate, and meets most IPDAS criteria relevant to organizational values-based decision-making.

Approaches for Lynch syndrome screening and characteristics of subtypes with mismatch repair deficiency in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

To evaluate different Lynch syndrome (LS) screening approaches and establish an efficient and sensitive strategy are critical for clinical practice. In total, 583 patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were enrolled. Patient samples were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MPH) was detected in MLH1-deficient cases. Germline genetic testing was performed in cases with deleterious variants and large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) of tumor MMR genes were detected in cases with dMMR or MSI-H cases with no MMR germline variants. Our results showed that triage with IHC and followed by BRAF/MLH1 methylation testing (Strategy 1) identified 93.3% (70/75) of LS cases. IHC followed by germline NGS (Strategy 2) or direct tumor NGS (Strategy 3) both identified 98.7% (74/75) of LS cases. The proportion of LGRs in LS cases was 16.0% (12/75), while 84.0% (63/75) showed SNV/Indel. The average cost per patient was ¥6010.81, ¥6058.48, and ¥8029.98 for Strategy 1, Strategy 2 and Strategy 3, respectively. The average time spent on different strategies was 4.74 days (Strategy 1), 4.89 days (Strategy 2), and 14.50 days (Strategy 3) per patient, respectively. LS and Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) were associated with an earlier onset age than MPH. In conclusion, we compared different workflows for LS screening and IHC plus germline NGS is recommended for LS screening when taking sensitivity, time, and cost into account. Moreover, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification made up for the shortcoming of NGS and should be incorporated into routine screening.

Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Colorectal Cancer: A 5-Year Experience of a Portuguese Pathology Department.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a prevalent genetic condition associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). Accurate identification of LS patients is challenging, and a universal tumor screening approach has been recommended. We present the methodology and results of universal LS screening in our hospital's Pathology Department. This retrospective study analyzed CRC tumors from a 5-year period (2017-2021). Immunohistochemistry was used to assess MMR protein expression, followed by BRAF V600E analysis and MLH1 promoter methylation. Statistical analysis examined associations between clinicopathologic variables MMR status and LS-suspected tumors. The study analyzed 939 colorectal carcinomas, with 8.7% exhibiting mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, significantly lower than previous research. After applying the algorithm, 24 LS-suspected cases were identified, accounting for 2.6% of tested patients and 29.3% of MMR-deficient tumors. Our study establishes the feasibility of universal testing for all new cases of CRC in detecting individuals at risk for LS, even in the absence of clinical information. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the MMR status in our population, further investigations are warranted.

Extended panel testing in ovarian cancer reveals BRIP1 as the third most important predisposition gene

PurposeThe prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination repair (HRR) and Lynch syndrome (LS) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) is uncertain. MethodsAn observational study reporting the detection rate of germline PVs in HRR and LS genes in all OC cases tested in the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub between September 1996 and May 2024. Effect sizes are reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for unselected cases tested between April 2021 and May 2024 versus 50,703 controls from the Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing study. Results2934 women were tested for BRCA1/2 and 433 (14.8%) had a PV. In up to 1572 women tested for PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, detection rates were PALB2 = 0.8%, BRIP1 = 1.1%, RAD51C = 0.4% and RAD51D = 0.4%. In 940 unselected cases, BRIP1 (OR = 8.7, 95% CI 4.6-15.8) was the third most common OC predisposition gene followed by RAD51C (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 3.1-23.1), RAD51D (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 2.1-19.7), and PALB2 (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-10.3). No PVs in LS genes were detected in unselected cases. ConclusionPanel testing in OC resulted in a detection rate of 2% to 3% for germline PVs in non-BRCA1/2 HRR genes, with the largest contributor being BRIP1. Screening for LS in unselected cases of OC is unnecessary.

Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer diagnoses in Auckland, New Zealand: The initial experience.

Universal mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (MMR IHC) tumour testing in endometrial cancer (EC) for Lynch syndrome (LS) was introduced in Auckland, New Zealand, in January 2017. Identifying patients with LS allows them and their families to access risk reduction strategies. Universal MMR IHC testing aids in the molecular classification of EC and has prognostic and therapeutic implications. We aimed to determine the incidence of LS in women with EC in Auckland, New Zealand, following the introduction of MMR testing and the impact of universal screening on local genetic services. This is a retrospective clinicopathological evaluation of women with a new EC diagnosis referred to the Auckland Gynaecological Oncology Unit from 1/1/17 to 31/12/18. Patient data were extracted from the Gynaecological Oncology Unit database and electronic records, and analysed using descriptive statistics. During the study period, 409 patients were diagnosed with EC, with an over-representation of Pacific Islanders (32.5%). Of these, 82.6% underwent MMR IHC testing, 20% were MMR-deficient (MMRd), and 71% had somatic hypermethylation. The Pacific Islander population had a 64% (odds ratio 0.36, P = 0.005) reduction in the odds of having MMRd tumours compared with Europeans. Of the patients who underwent MMR IHC testing, 5.5% were referred to a genetic clinic for germline testing. LS was confirmed in eight patients (2.3%). LS was diagnosed in 2.3% of patients. There was an over-representation of Pacific Islanders in the EC group but not among those diagnosed with LS.

A novel colorectal cancer test combining microsatellite instability and BRAF/RAS analysis: Clinical validation and impact on Lynch syndrome screening

BackgroundLynch syndrome (LS) is under-diagnosed. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend multistep molecular testing of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) to screen for LS. However, the complexity of the pathway has resulted in limited improvement in diagnosis.MethodsOne-step multiplex PCR was used to generate sequencing-ready amplicons from 14 microsatellite instability (MSI) markers and 22 BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS mutation hotspots. MSI and BRAF/RAS variants were detected using amplicon-sequencing and automated analysis. The assay was clinically validated and deployed into service in northern England, followed by regional and local audits to assess its impact.ResultsMSI analysis achieved 99.1% sensitivity and 99.2% specificity and was reproducible (r = 0.995). Mutation hotspot analysis had 100% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity, and was reproducible (r = 0.998). Assay-use in service in 2022–2023 increased CRC testing (97.2% (2466/2536) versus 28.6% (601/2104)), halved turnaround times, and identified more CRC patients at-risk of LS (5.5% (139/2536) versus 2.9% (61/2104)) compared to 2019–2020 when a multi-test pathway was used.ConclusionA novel amplicon-sequencing assay of CRCs, including all biomarkers for LS screening and anti-EGFR therapy, achieved >95% testing rate. Adoption of this low cost, scalable, and fully automatable test will complement on-going, national initiatives to improve LS screening.

HGG-26. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, AND PMS2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY REPRESENTS A HIGHLY SENSITIVE SCREENING METHOD FOR MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES IN PEDIATRIC HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors can occur as first manifestations of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) resulting from pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Early detection of MMR deficiencies (MMRD) may warrant the therapeutic use of checkpoint inhibitors and enable genetic consulting for the patient’s families. METHODS We prospectively screened 128 pediatric high-grade gliomas (pedHGG) for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as part of the HIT-HGG-2013 clinical trial. We compared IHC results to independently collected patient information on CPS including MMRD to test the method’s efficiency in screening for Lynch syndrome and Constitutional MMRD syndrome CMMRD. RESULTS From 128 successfully tested tumors, ten cases (10/128, 7.8%), showed loss of expression of at least one of the MMR proteins. In seven of the ten affected patients (7/128, 5.5%), genetic testing uncovered heterozygous (6/10) or homozygous (1/10) pathogenic germline variants in MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6) confirming the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome respectively CMMRD. In three cases (3/128 2.3%), MMR alterations were restricted to tumor tissue. The group of diffuse midline gliomas, H3 K27-altered, (67/128, 52.3%) did not show MMR alterations, while either somatic or germline MMR mutations were detected in two of eight patients with diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant. In 88 patients (88/128, 68.8%) either clinical or molecular-genetic information on CPS could be provided. All ten patients with signs of MMRD were successfully detected by IHC from tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS IHC for MMR proteins represents a highly sensitive screening method for MMRD in pedHGG. Considering the occurrence of at least 11.5% (7/61) of MMRD in pediatric patients with diffuse high-grade glioma excluding DMG, MMRD IHC should be part of routine diagnostics as cost-effective, broadly available and robust screening method.

Population-Level Identification of Patients With Lynch Syndrome for Clinical Care, Quality Improvement, and Research.

Identification of those at risk of hereditary cancer syndromes using electronic health record (EHR) data sources is important for clinical care, quality improvement, and research. We describe diagnostic processes, previously seldom reported, for a common hereditary cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome (LS), using EHR data within a community-based, multicenter, demographically diverse health system. Within a retrospective cohort enrolled between 2015 and 2020 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, we assessed electronic diagnostic domains for LS including (1) family history of LS-associated cancer; (2) personal history of LS-associated cancer; (3) LS screening via mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) testing of newly diagnosed malignancy; (4) germline genetic test results; and (5) clinician-entered diagnostic codes for LS. We calculated proportions and overlap for each diagnostic domain descriptively. Among 5.8 million individuals, (1) 28,492 (0.49%) had a family history of LS-associated cancer of whom 3,635 (13%) underwent genetic testing; (2) 100,046 (1.7%) had a personal history of a LS-associated cancer; and (3) 8,711 (0.1%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer of whom 7,533 (86%) underwent MMRD screening and of the positive screens (486), 130 (27%) underwent germline testing. One thousand seven hundred and fifty-seven (0.03%) were diagnosed with endometrial cancer of whom 1,613 (92%) underwent MMRD screening and of the 195 who screened positive, 55 (28%) underwent genetic testing. (4) 30,790 (0.05%) had LS germline genetic testing with 707 (0.01%) testing positive; and (5) 1,273 (0.02%) had a clinician-entered diagnosis of LS. It is feasible to electronically characterize the diagnostic processes of LS. No single data source comprehensively identifies all LS carriers. There is underutilization of LS genetic testing for those eligible and underdiagnosis of LS. Our work informs similar efforts in other settings for hereditary cancer syndromes.

Investigating somatic variants and pathways in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal carcinoma in South Africa

AimsColorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and an emerging public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. Several authors have described an increased frequency of mismatch...

Evaluation of EGFR and COX pathway inhibition in human colon organoids of serrated polyposis and other hereditary cancer syndromes.

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) presents with multiple sessile serrated lesions (SSL) in the large intestine and confers increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. However, the etiology of SPS is not known. SSL-derived organoids have not been previously studied but may help provide insights into SPS pathogenesis and identify novel biomarkers and chemopreventive strategies. This study examined effects of EGFR and COX pathway inhibition in organoid cultures derived from uninvolved colon and polyps of SPS patients. We also compared with organoids representing the hereditary gastrointestinal syndromes, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (LS). Eighteen total organoid colon cultures were generated from uninvolved colon and polyps in SPS, FAP, LS, and non-syndromic screening colonoscopy patients. BRAF and KRAS mutation status was determined for each culture. Erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) and sulindac (COX inhibitor) were applied individually and in combination. A 44-target gene custom mRNA panel (including WNT and COX pathway genes) and a 798-gene microRNA gene panel were used to quantitate organoid RNA expression by NanoString analysis. Erlotinib treatment significantly decreased levels of mRNAs associated with WNT and MAPK kinase signaling in organoids from uninvolved colon from all four patient categories and from all SSL and adenomatous polyps. Sulindac did not change the mRNA profile in any culture. Our findings suggest that EGFR inhibitors may contribute to the chemopreventive treatment of SSLs. These findings may also facilitate clinical trial design using these agents in SPS patients. Differentially expressed genes identified in our study (MYC, FOSL1, EGR1, IL33, LGR5 and FOXQ1) may be used to identify other new molecular targets for chemoprevention of SSLs.

Cascade screening in HBOC and Lynch syndrome: guidelines and procedures in a UK centre

In the 33 years since the first diagnostic cancer predisposition gene (CPG) tests in the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, there has been substantial changes in the identification of index cases and cascade testing for at-risk family members. National guidelines in England and Wales are usually determined from the National Institute of healthcare Evidence and these have impacted on the thresholds for testing BRCA1/2 in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and in determining that all cases of colorectal and endometrial cancer should undergo screening for Lynch syndrome. Gaps for testing other CPGs relevant to HBOC have been filled by the UK Cancer Genetics Group and CanGene-CanVar project (web ref. https://www.cangene-canvaruk.org/). We present time trends (1990–2020) of identification of index cases with germline CPG variants and numbers of subsequent cascade tests, for BRCA1, BRCA2, and the Lynch genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2). For BRCA1/2 there was a definite increase in the proportion of index cases with ovarian cancer only and pre-symptomatic index tests both doubling from 16 to 32% and 3.2 to > 8% respectively. A mean of 1.73–1.74 additional family tests were generated for each BRCA1/2 index case within 2 years. Overall close to one positive cascade test was generated per index case resulting in > 1000 risk reducing surgery operations. In Lynch syndrome slightly more cascade tests were performed in the first two years potentially reflecting the increased actionability in males with 42.2% of pre-symptomatic tests in males compared to 25.8% in BRCA1/2 (p < 0.0001).

Abstract IA004: Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome versus germline multi-gene panel testing for all endometrial cancer patients

Abstract Introduction: Implementation of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome has been adopted more slowly for endometrial cancer patients than colorectal cancer patients yet the data is very similar. Recent guidelines have suggested doing both universal tumor screening and considering multi-gene panel testing for all colorectal cancer patients and so the data in endometrial cancer patients was reviewed to determine if the same recommendation could be made for endometrial cancer. Methods: Review of the literature found 4 large studies of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome among and 6 large studies of universal multi-gene panel testing among large cohorts of endometrial cancer patients. Results were reviewed and a meta-analysis performed. Results: Four large studies have looked at universal tumor screening among all endometrial cancer patients. They found that 23-26.7% of endometrial cancers are MSI-high or dMMR. The majority of these dMMR endometrial cancers are caused by MLH1 promoter hypermethylation which is present in 14-20.2% of all EC cases (60.3-75.8% of dMMR cases). Lynch syndrome was ultimately diagnosed in 2.5-3.3% of all endometrial cancer patients. The mutation distribution among Lynch syndrome patient diagnosed through universal tumor screening was 53.1% MSH6, 24.5% MSH2, 12.2% MLH1, and 10.2% PMS2. IHC was better at identifying Lynch syndrome cases than MSI among endometrial cancers (mainly due to MSH6 tumors not always being MSI-high). Multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) for all endometrial cancer patients has been reported in 6 studies of endometrial cancer patients (3 high risk and 3 unselected). MGPT studies found that 10 – 14% of unselected and 9 - 15% of selected endometrial cancer patients have a pathogenic variant in a cancer susceptibility gene. Patients diagnosed under age 50 were not significantly more likely to test positive. In the three selected cohorts, the prevalence of Lynch syndrome was 8.1% (575/7095). In the three unselected cohorts, the prevalence of Lynch syndrome was 2.7% (73/2742). Conclusions: Tumor screening with MSI or MMR IHC for all endometrial cancers will only identify Lynch syndrome (as intended). It will miss patiesporadicny other hereditary cancer syndrome and some patients with Lynch syndrome who have a sporadic endometrial cancer. However, it is now necessary for treatment purposes (Immune Checkpoint Blockade therapy). Universal germline MGPT testing for all endometrial cancers will identify some Lynch syndrome cases who have normal tumor screening and will identify many non-Lynch syndrome cases that would be completely missed by tumor screening. Citation Format: Heather Hampel. Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome versus germline multi-gene panel testing for all endometrial cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Transforming Care through Science; 2023 Nov 16-18; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(5_Suppl):Abstract nr IA004.

Lynch Syndrome: From Multidisciplinary Management to Precision Prevention.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is currently one of the most prevalent hereditary cancer conditions, accounting for 3% of all colorectal cancers and for up to 15% of those with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, and it was one of the first historically identified. The understanding of the molecular carcinogenesis of LS tumors has progressed significantly in recent years. We aim to review the most recent advances in LS research and explore genotype-based approaches in surveillance, personalized cancer prevention, and treatment strategies. PubMed was searched to identify relevant studies, conducted up to December 2023, investigating molecular carcinogenesis in LS, surveillance strategies, cancer prevention, and treatment in LS tumors. Multigene panel sequencing is becoming the benchmark in the diagnosis of LS, allowing for the detection of a pathogenic constitutional variant in one of the MMR genes. Emerging data from randomized controlled trials suggest possible preventive roles of resistant starch and/or aspirin in LS. Vaccination with immunogenic frameshift peptides appears to be a promising approach for both the treatment and prevention of LS-associated cancers, as evidenced by pre-clinical and preliminary phase 1/2a studies. Although robust diagnostic algorithms, including prompt testing of tumor tissue for MMR defects and referral for genetic counselling, currently exist for suspected LS in CRC patients, the indications for LS screening in cancer-free individuals still need to be refined and standardized. Investigation into additional genetic and non-genetic factors that may explain residual rates of interval cancers, even in properly screened populations, would allow for more tailored preventive strategies.

A164 OPTIMIZING A PROVINCIAL SCREENING PROGRAM FOR DETECTION OF LYNCH SYNDROME

Abstract Background Up to 30% of those with colorectal cancer (CRC) have an affected family member. Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common inherited condition predisposing patients to CRC. LS is an autosomal dominant condition associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and screening CRC cases ≤ age 70 can identify LS in a cost-effective manner. Manitoba launched Canada's first provincial reflex screening program for all CRC cases diagnosed ≤ age 70 using MMR immunohistochemistry (MMR-IHC) in 2017. Our prior 2022 study evaluating the program showed compliance rates of 89.4% for MMR-IHC reflex testing and a 75.8% overall referral rate of screen-positive cases to genetics. However, only 50% were referred directly by pathologists. Several modifications have since been implemented to enhance the program. These included providing feedback to pathologists, creating an “additional testing comment section” on synoptic pathology reports, and regular review of the pathology reports by a pathology assistant. Information materials were developed to encourage genetic testing among relatives. Aims Assess whether modifications to Manitoba’s universal screening protocol improved LS patient outcomes and determine any remaining factors to optimize. We specifically aimed to identify current compliance rates for MMR-IHC testing, the overall referral rate of screen-positive cases to genetics, uptake of genetic referrals and genetic testing as well as rate of cascade testing among relatives. Methods Data has been obtained by searching the provincial pathology database for “adenocarcinoma” in the colorectal specimen pathology reports. All specimens from 2022 and Q1/Q2 of 2023 were reviewed, meeting the criteria of: a) specimen from colon biopsy/excision containing the term “adenocarcinoma”, b) patient age ≤70 years, and c) missing MMR centralized by the IT/Pathology department. Additionally, a random sample of cases categorized as “MMR performed” will be audited. We are in the process of reviewing genetic referrals, genetic uptake and the frequency of reminders triggered to each pathologist. Results Currently, a total of 1,308 colonic adenocarcinoma specimens (811 from 2022, 497 for 2023) have been reviewed. Appropriate MMR testing was missed in only 1.5% of cases (13/811 =1.6% missed in 2022, 7/497= 1.4% missed in 2023). Conclusions Current MMR testing rates for colonic adenocarcinoma specimens within the Manitoba LS screening program have reached a current compliance rate of 98.5%, a substantial improvement from the prior audit (89.4% previously). Further data collection and analysis is ongoing and will also be presented. The reported rates of compliance are the highest that have been reported from any jurisdiction. This study highlights the sustained efforts required to improve detection of LS. Funding Agencies None

Real-World Data on Institutional Implementation of Screening for Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Lynch Syndrome in Endometrial Cancer Patients

Lynch syndrome is an inherited tumor syndrome caused by a pathogenic germline variant in DNA mismatch repair genes. As the leading cause of hereditary endometrial cancer, international guidelines recommend universal screening in women with endometrial cancer. However, testing for Lynch syndrome is not yet well established in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to our Lynch syndrome screening algorithm. A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted of all endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment at the Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, between 2017 and 2022. Adherence to immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair status, and, if indicated, to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and to genetic counseling and testing was assessed. Of all 331 endometrial cancer patients, 102 (30.8%) were mismatch repair-deficient and 3 (0.9%) patients were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome. Overall screening adherence was 78.2%, with a notable improvement over the six years from 61.4% to 90.6%. A major reason for non-adherence was lack of provider recommendation for testing, with advanced patient age as a potential patient risk factor. Simplification of the algorithm through standardized reflex screening was recommended to provide optimal medical care for those affected and to allow for cascading testing of at-risk relatives.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology clinical guidelines: Molecular testing for colorectal cancer treatment, 5th edition.

Molecular testing to determine optimal therapies is essential for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In October 2022, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published the 5th edition of the Molecular Testing Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. In this guideline, in patients with unresectable CRC, RAS/BRAF V600E mutational and mismatch repair tests are strongly recommended prior to first-line chemotherapy to select optimal first- and second-line therapies. In addition, HER2 testing is strongly recommended because the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab combination is insured after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in Japan. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based RAS testing is also strongly recommended to assess the indications for the readministration of anti-EGFR antibodies. Both tissue- and ctDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling tests are strongly recommended to assess the indications for targeted molecular drugs, although they are currently insured in patients with disease progression after receiving standard chemotherapy (or in whom disease progression is expected in the near future). Mutational and mismatch repair testing is strongly recommended for patients with resectable CRC, and RAS/BRAF V600E mutation testing is recommended to estimate the risk of recurrence. Mutational and mismatch repair and BRAF testing are also strongly recommended for screening for Lynch syndrome. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is strongly recommended for estimating the risk of recurrence based on clinical evidence, although MRD testing was not approved in Japan at the time of the publication of this guideline.

Retrospective review of compliance with guideline-directed germline testing in microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer treated at the Veterans Health Administration.

86 Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited cancer syndrome that confers an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). As clinical and history features under-recognize LS cases (3-5% of CRC), universal screening of CRCs for LS is recommended. Patients whose CRCs are mismatch repair protein deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) are recommended to have subsequent genetics evaluation to screen for germline mutations. Confirmed LS changes cancer surveillance recommendations for affected patients and their relatives. Within Veterans Health Administration (VHA), GT is ordered by genetic counselors at genomic medicine telehealth centers (GMTC), after initial consultation. We aim to quantify rates at which CRC patients treated at the VHA complete germline testing (GT) when indicated. Methods: The electronic health records (EHRs) of VHA patients with known dMMR/MSI-H CRC were reviewed. Cases were extracted from both Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound and referral VA MSI testing laboratories. Surgical pathology reports and clinical documentation were reviewed in Joint Longitudinal Viewer (JLV) to determine if GT was indicated and reason for non-testing, if not performed. Patients with known LS prior to development of CRC were excluded, and patients with dMMR in MLH1 or MSI-H with concurrent BRAFV600 mutation and/or MLH1 hypermethylation were considered to have sporadic CRC. Results: Of 110 patients with abnormal tumor LS screening; 39 (36%) patients’ tumor tissue underwent IHC for dMMR, 16 (14%) underwent PCR for MSI, and 55 (50%) had both. 45 (41%) patients were classified as somatic MSI-H. 65 (59%) patients met criteria for referral for GMTC and GT. Of these 65, 49 ultimately did not undergo GT and 16 did, which confirmed 4 cases of LS and revealed 1 variant of uncertain significance in the MLH1 gene. Reasons for non-testing were: 7 (14%) declined all cancer testing and treatment after CRC diagnosis or were lost to follow-up/declined establishment of cancer care, 3 (6%) declined referral to GMTC, 14 (29%) accepted referral to GMTC but never had consultation, 7 (14%) accepted referral to GMTC but declined GT when offered, and 18 (37%) were never offered GMTC referral or GT. Conclusions: A majority of dMMR/MSI-H cases with an indication for GT were referred for genetic counseling, but only a small subset completed testing. This analysis identified multiple areas for improvement, including a lack of recognition by providers for the need for GT, and lack of completion of testing by patients at multiple levels. Further evaluation of VHA-specific barriers is needed to improve the quality of delivered care.