Screen-detected Breast Cancer Patients Research Articles

Lead-Time Corrected Effect on Breast Cancer Survival in Germany by Mode of Detection.

(1) Background: Screen-detected breast cancer patients tend to have better survival than patients diagnosed with symptomatic cancer. The main driver of improved survival in screen-detected cancer is detection at earlier stage. An important bias is introduced by lead time, i.e., the time span by which the diagnosis has been advanced by screening. We examine whether there is a remaining survival difference that could be attributable to mode of detection, for example, because of higher quality of care. (2) Methods: Women with a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis in 2000-2022 were included from a population-based cancer registry from Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, which also registers the mode of cancer detection. Mammography screening was available from 2005 onwards. We compared the survival for BC detected by screening with symptomatic BC detection using Kaplan-Meier, unadjusted Cox regressions, and Cox regressions adjusted for age, grading, and UICC stage. Correction for lead time bias was carried out by assuming an exponential distribution of the period during which the tumor is asymptomatic but screen-detectable (sojourn time). We used a common estimate and two recently published estimates of sojourn times. (3) Results: The analysis included 32,169 women. Survival for symptomatic BC was lower than for screen-detected BC (hazard ratio (HR): 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.25). Adjustment for prognostic factors and lead time bias with the commonly used sojourn time resulted in an HR of 0.84 (CI: 0.75-0.94). Using different sojourn times resulted in an HR of 0.73 to 0.90. (4) Conclusions: Survival for symptomatic BC was only one quarter of screen-detected tumors, which is obviously biased. After adjustment for lead-time bias and prognostic variables, including UICC stage, survival was 27% to 10% better for screen-detected BC, which might be attributed to BC screening. Although this result fits quite well with published results for other countries with BC screening, further sources for residual confounding (e.g., self-selection) cannot be ruled out.

Beyond a decade: a comparative study of 15-year survival rates in screen-detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer patients in Hungary

BackgroundBreast cancer is the leading cancer in women globally. Despite decreasing mortality rates, largely due to early detection and modern treatment, the effectiveness of screening on long-term survival outcomes remains unclear.AimsThis study evaluates the 15-year survival outcomes of a national breast cancer screening program initiated in Hungary in 2002.MethodsUsing a prospectively maintained patient database, the study included individuals from the first 6 years of the program who underwent surgery for histologically confirmed breast cancer and had available follow-up information. Patients were categorized based on the method of breast cancer detection into two groups: those diagnosed during or 2 years after the population-based screening exam (Group A), and those who self-detected or sought medical attention for symptoms (Group B).ResultsOf the 309 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery, 208 were screen-detected (Group A) and 101 were symptomatic (Group B). The 15-year overall survival was 75.0% for Group A and 76.2% for Group B (p = 0.927). The 15-year disease-specific survival was 85.6% and 81.2% (p = 0.249), respectively. A statistically not significant positive trend in disease-free survival was observed in Group A (81.7% vs. 75.2%; p = 0.144).ConclusionsThe study underscores the importance of extended follow-up periods in evaluating the outcomes of breast cancer screening programs. While the screening program may not significantly enhance overall survival rates, it has demonstrated a reduction in the mastectomy rate and could potentially extend periods of disease-free survival. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse about the long-term benefits of breast cancer screening programs.

The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients Recalled at Biennial Screening Mammography: An Observational Cohort Study

BackgroundThis study aimed to examine the association between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical margin involvement, as well as to determine the factors associated with positive resection margins in screen-detected breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS).MethodsBreast cancer patients eligible for BCS and diagnosed after biennial screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands (2008–2017) were retrospectively included. Missing values were imputed and multivariable regression analyses were performed to analyze whether preoperative MRI was related to margin involvement after BCS, as well as to examine what factors were associated with positive resection margins, defined as more than focally (>4 mm) involved.ResultsOverall, 2483 patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled, of whom 123 (5.0%) had more than focally involved resection margins. In multivariable regression analyses, preoperative MRI was associated with a reduced risk of positive resection margins after BCS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–0.96). Lobular histology (adjusted OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.68–4.87), large tumor size (per millimeter increase, adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03–1.07), high (>75%) mammographic density (adjusted OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.07–12.12), and the presence of microcalcifications (adjusted OR 4.45, 95% CI 2.69–7.37) and architectural distortions (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.01–3.40) were independently associated with positive resection margins after BCS.ConclusionsPreoperative MRI was associated with lower risk of positive resection margins in patients with invasive breast cancer eligible for BCS using multivariable analysis. Furthermore, specific mammographic characteristics and tumor characteristics were independently associated with positive resection margins after BCS.

Variations in intrinsic breast cancer characteristics in screen-detected breast cancer patients aged between 45 and 69 and above the age of 70.

Increasing age is a well-recognized risk factor for breast cancer. With an increase in life expectancy of women, more older patients are diagnosed with breast cancer. This study aimed to identify the variations in breast cancer attributes and mortality in different age groups in New Zealand. This was a retrospective study of data from the Auckland Breast Cancer Register between 1 June 2000 and 28 February 2017. Patients who were diagnosed through Breast Screen were included. Group A included those aged between 45 and 69 years. Group B included individuals with an age of 70 years or above. From June 2000 to February 2017, a total of 6304 new cases of new breast cancer were diagnosed through Auckland Breast Screen, with 5788 patients in group A and 516 patients in group B. Group B was more likely to have the lower grade invasive cancers, with fewer grade 3 cancers. Oestrogen receptor positivity was more pronounced in group B, along with progesterone receptor positivity. Conversely, HER-2 receptor was less likely to be positive in group B. There was a significantly higher breast cancer-related mortality in group B (6.0% versus 2.7%). Mortality related to other causes was also much higher in group B as compared to that in group A (12.8% versus 2.5%). Women aged 70 years or above generally tend to have a more favourable type of breast cancer, with a lower tumour grade, oestrogen and progesterone receptor positivity, and lower rate of HER-2 overexpression.

Breast Biopsy During Post-treatment Surveillance of Screen-Detected Breast Cancer Patients Yields High Rates of Benign Findings

The incidence of breast biopsy following treatment for breast cancer is not well-characterized. We sought to determine the frequency and outcomes of breast biopsy and the need for subsequent surgery in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Using a prospective database, we identified patients in Alberta, Canada, treated with BCS for screen-detected breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from 2010 to 2014. Post-treatment breast procedures were identified from physician claims data. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with biopsy. We included 2065 patients with a median of 6.4years of follow-up; most had DCIS (n = 426, 20.6%) or stage I disease (n = 1385, 67.1%). Post-treatment core biopsy was performed in 389 (18.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.2-20.6%) patients, and excisional biopsy was performed in 19 (0.9%, 95% CI 0.6-1.4%) patients. The per-patient benign-to-malignant biopsy ratio was 3.2 to 1, and the overall malignancy rate was 6.1% (95% CI 5.1-7.2%). Younger age, proximity to a cancer center, positive margins, and the use of magnetic resonance imaging were associated with biopsy (p < 0.05). Additional surgery was performed in 150 (7.3%, 95% CI 6.2-8.5%) patients; 93 (4.5%, 95% CI 3.6-5.4%) patients underwent mastectomy. Surgery was performed for local recurrence/ipsilateral cancer in 62 (3.0%) patients, contralateral breast cancer in 60 (2.9%) patients, bilateral breast cancer in 3 (0.1%) patients, and benign indications/prophylaxis in 25 (1.2%) patients. One in five patients required breast biopsy during post-treatment surveillance following BCS and most revealed benign findings. Rates of additional surgery, especially subsequent mastectomy due to ipsilateral or contralateral malignancy, were low. Patients can be reassured of these findings during pre-treatment counseling and post-treatment surveillance.

Is preoperative ultrasound of the axilla necessary in screen-detected breast cancer?

BackgroundAxillary ultrasound (US) with fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of suspicious lymph nodes helps identify patients with axillary metastases preoperatively avoiding a 2-step axillary procedure. However, it does not accurately differentiate between low and high axillary tumour burden. Our aim was to determine the rationale of preoperative axillary US in screen-detected breast cancer. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed patients, aged between 50 and 69 years, which had an invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the Slovenian National Breast Cancer Screening program between January 2012 and June 2017. Proportion of patients that proceeded directly to ALND and the proportion of patients with unnecessary ALND as a result of positive US-FNAB were calculated. ResultsAltogether 892 patients were eligible for analysis. Preoperative US of the axilla was performed in 856/892 (96%) patients, while 36/892 patients (4%) did not undergo US of the axilla. We have found out that upfront ALND due to positive US-FNAB was performed in 91/856 (10.6%) patients. 116/856 patients (13.6%) had tumours in inner quadrants and maximal mammographic tumour size ≤ 2 cm. Among them only 1/116 (0.9%) proceeded directly to ALND due to positive US-FNAB.The final pathology of those who underwent upfront ALND due to positive US-FNAB showed low axillary tumour burden not meeting the indications for ALND in 13/91 (14.3%) patients.Among patients without preoperative axillary US, only 1/36 (2.8%) met the indications for ALND. ConclusionOur results showed that performing US of the axilla is not justified in screen detected breast cancer patients.

Investigation of the pathomechanism of smoke-induced pancreatic damage

The need for completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the sentinel nodes (SNs) is controversial. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to determine if the method of detection of early breast cancer is predictive for additional positive nodes in patients with micrometastases in the SNs.Between 2001 and 2011 a total of 1993 women with primary unilateral breast cancer had surgery at Skåne University Hospital, Lund. Of 1993 patients, 1458 had an SN biopsy and nearly all patients with micro- and macrometastases had ALND.Micrometastases defined as >0.2 mm/>200 cells and ≤2.0 mm were found in 62 of 757 screen-detected patients and in 81 of 701 patients with symptomatic breast cancer. Only 3 of the screen-detected patients with micrometastases, all with tumour size >15 mm (range 18–39 mm), had metastases in the completion ALND whereas this was found in 18 of the symptomatic patients with micrometastases (p = 0.01), (tumour size, range 10–30 mm). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for method of detection, tumour size and histological grade showed 5 times higher odds for further metastases in ALND in patients with symptomatic presentation vs. screen-detected breast cancer.Despite the small number of patients with micrometastases in this large cohort of breast cancer patients, these results support the contention that completion ALND can safely be omitted in screen-detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the SNs.

Effect of specialized diagnostic assessment units on the time to diagnosis in screen-detected breast cancer patients.

Background:The duration of the cancer diagnostic process has considerable influence on patients' psychosocial well-being. Breast diagnostic assessment units (DAUs) in Ontario, Canada are designed to improve the quality and timeliness of care during a breast cancer diagnosis. We compared the diagnostic duration of patients diagnosed through a DAU vs usual care (UC).Methods:Retrospective population-based cohort study of 2499 screen-detected breast cancers (2011) using administrative health-care databases linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry. The diagnostic interval was measured from the initial screen to cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic assessment unit use was based on the biopsy and/or surgery hospital. We compared the length of the diagnostic interval between the DAU groups using multivariable quantile regression.Results:Diagnostic assessment units had a higher proportion of patients diagnosed within the 7-week target compared with UC (79.1% vs 70.2%, P<0.001). The median time to diagnosis at DAUs was 26 days, which was 9 days shorter compared with UC (95% CI: 6.4–11.6). This effect was reduced to 8.3 days after adjusting for all study covariates. Adjusted DAU differences were similar at the 75th and 90th percentiles of the diagnostic interval distribution.Conclusions:Diagnosis through an Ontario DAU was associated with a reduced time to diagnosis for screen-detected breast cancer patients, which likely reduces the anxiety and distress associated with waiting for a diagnosis.

Does geographic location impact the survival differential between screen- and interval-detected breast cancers?

Although mammography screening programs aim to diagnose breast cancer at an early stage, not all tumours are detected during the regular screening examination. This study examines the influence of various characteristics, including geographical residence, on the survival between screen- and interval-detected breast cancers among participants of a public population-based breast screening program in Queensland, Australia. The investigation was performed using the linked population-based datasets from BreastScreen Queensland and the Queensland Cancer Registry for the period of 1997–2008 for women aged 40–89 years at diagnosis. A Bayesian spatial relative survival modelling approach that accommodates rare outcomes in small geographic regions was adopted, with the use of Markov chain Monte Carlo computation, to evaluate the relative excess risk of breast cancer. In the multivariate Bayesian spatial model, higher relative excess risk of mortality was observed in interval-detected cancer (RER = 1.59, 95 % credible interval = [1.33, 1.89]) compared to screen-detected cancer. Higher cancer survival among the study cohort was also observed among younger women (40–59 years), those of non-Indigenous ethnicity, with localised (stage I) tumour stage as well as those not in the work force. There was no independent association with marital status. Moreover, there was no substantive evidence of either measured geographical or latent random spatial inequalities in survival among screening participants across Queensland, meaning the higher survival for screen-detected breast cancer patients compared to interval-detected women was consistent across the state. These results provide suggestive evidence supporting the effectiveness of the BreastScreen Queensland screening program in reaching socio-economically disadvantaged women as well as those living in rural and remote areas of the state, but also highlights the need for any interval cancer awareness programs to be geographically widespread.

BMI and breast cancer prognosis benefit: Mammography screening reveals differences between normal weight and overweight women

ObjectivesFew studies are available on the potential impact of body weight on breast cancer prognosis in screen-detected patients. Moreover, it is not known whether body mass index (BMI) could have a different prognostic impact in screen-detected versus symptomatic breast cancer patients. To investigate these unsolved issues, we carried out a retrospective study evaluating the effect of BMI on breast cancer prognosis in screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer patients. Materials and methodsWe conducted a follow-up study on 448 women diagnosed with incident, histologically-confirmed breast cancer. Patients were categorized according to their BMI as normal weight, overweight and obese. Disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and BMI curves were compared according to mode of cancer detection. ResultsAmong screen-detected patients, higher BMI was associated with a significant lower DFS, whereas no significant difference was observed among symptomatic patients. OS showed similar results. In the multivariate analysis adjusting for age, education, tumor size, nodal status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and menopausal status, the risk for high level of BMI among screen-detected patients did not reach the statistical significance for either recurrence or survival. ConclusionOur study highlights the potential impact of high bodyweight in breast cancer prognosis, the findings confirm that obesity plays a role in women breast cancer prognosis independently from diagnosis mode.

Letter to the Editor regarding manuscript entitled: Completion axillary dissection can safely be omitted in screen detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases. A decade's experience from a single institution. Grabau D, Dihge L, Ferno M, Ingvar C, Ryden L. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):601–7

Grabau et al. tackle the very topical subject of identifying breast cancer patients where completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be omitted in the presence of positive findings at sentinel node biopsy. 1 Grabau D. Dihge L. Ferno M. Ingvar C. Ryden L. Completion axillary dissection can safely be omitted in screen detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases. A decade's experience from a single institution. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun; 39: 601-607 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar In a retrospective review of 1458 patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy for primary, unilateral breast cancer, they identify 62 (of 757) screen-detected and 81 (of 701) symptomatic patients with micrometastases. Only 3 of 62 (5%) screen-detected patients with micrometastases had further metastases on completion ALND compared to 18 of 81 (22%) symptomatic patients (p = 0.01). They conclude that ‘completion ALND can safely be omitted in screen-detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the sentinel nodes’. Letter to the Editor regarding response to manuscript entitled: Completion axillary dissection can safely be omitted in screen detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases. A decade's experience from a single institution. Grabau D, Dihge L, Ferno M, Ingvar C, Ryden L. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):601–7European Journal of Surgical OncologyVol. 39Issue 11PreviewThank you very much for your interest in our article. You report results from your own department where you do not find any significant difference in positive completion axillary dissection (ALND) in patients with micrometastases in sentinel nodes as a function of the mode of presentation (screen-detected vs. symptomatic). On the contrary you find a tendency to more positive completion ALND specimens in screen-detected patients with micrometastases in sentinel nodes. Full-Text PDF

Letter to the Editor regarding response to manuscript entitled: Completion axillary dissection can safely be omitted in screen detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases. A decade's experience from a single institution. Grabau D, Dihge L, Ferno M, Ingvar C, Ryden L. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):601–7

Letter to the Editor regarding response to manuscript entitled: Completion axillary dissection can safely be omitted in screen detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases. A decade's experience from a single institution. Grabau D, Dihge L, Ferno M, Ingvar C, Ryden L. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):601–7

Completion axillary dissection can safely be omitted in screen detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases. A decade's experience from a single institution

The need for completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the sentinel nodes (SNs) is controversial. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to determine if the method of detection of early breast cancer is predictive for additional positive nodes in patients with micrometastases in the SNs. Between 2001 and 2011 a total of 1993 women with primary unilateral breast cancer had surgery at Skåne University Hospital, Lund. Of 1993 patients, 1458 had an SN biopsy and nearly all patients with micro- and macrometastases had ALND. Micrometastases defined as >0.2mm/>200 cells and ≤2.0mm were found in 62 of 757 screen-detected patients and in 81 of 701 patients with symptomatic breast cancer. Only 3 of the screen-detected patients with micrometastases, all with tumour size >15mm (range 18-39mm), had metastases in the completion ALND whereas this was found in 18 of the symptomatic patients with micrometastases (p=0.01), (tumour size, range 10-30mm). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for method of detection, tumour size and histological grade showed 5 times higher odds for further metastases in ALND in patients with symptomatic presentation vs. screen-detected breast cancer. Despite the small number of patients with micrometastases in this large cohort of breast cancer patients, these results support the contention that completion ALND can safely be omitted in screen-detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the SNs.

P5-14-02: Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Difference of Screen Detected Breast Cancer Compared with Symptomatic Breast Cancer.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer screening program makes it possible to detect early cancer, thus to reduce breast cancer mortality. The authors studied clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of screen detected invasive breast cancer compared with symptomatic breast cancer. Furthermore, we compared the result according to molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, Her2, triple negative), so intended to identify the role of screening in each subtypes. Material and Methods: From January 2002 to June 2008, 3141 patients who underwent operation for the treatment of invasive ductal carcinoma(NOS) at Samsung medical center were included. Among them, 1025 patient were screen detected, 2116 patient were symptomatic, out of screening over 2 years. We reviewed the medical records retrospectively. Result: Screen detected breast cancer was associated with older patients, smaller tumor size, more hormone receptor- positive, less lymph node involvement, lower stage and reduced mortality compared with symptomatic breast cancer (P &amp;lt; .001). According to the molecular subtype, in luminal A subtype, the result shows better pathologic feature and also favorable overall and recur-free survial significantly. Conclusion: Compared to symptomatic breast cancer patients, screen detected breast cancer patients have favorable pathological and molecular characteristics, so better outcomes. According to the molecular subtype, only in luminal A subtype, screen detected breast cancer shows both overall and disease free survival benefit, and also acts as an independent prognostic factor itself. So, screening program seems to have a different efficacy depending on the molecular subtype of breast cancer Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-02.

Re-evaluating the role of axillary lymph node dissection in screen-detected breast cancer patients

IntroductionThe American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG), Z0011 trial, demonstrated that there was no therapeutic benefit from completion lymphadenectomy in early stage breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node (SLN) biopsy. Patients with asymptomatic screen-detected tumors may represent a subgroup where completion axillary dissection with its attendant morbidities is unacceptable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ALND in an asymptomatic screen-detected breast cancer cohort. MethodsPatients were recruited from the national screening program which offers women (aged 50 to 65) biannual digital mammography. Over a 1 year period 519 screen-detected breast cancer patients were recruited of which 110 had a positive SLN. ResultsOf 519 patients in a national screening program that were clinically/radiologically identified as axillary node negative, 110 (21.2%) had a positive SLN. All 110 (T1 = 68, T2 = 42) patients proceeded to have an axillary clearance. 68 (59%) had T1 tumors and of these 40 (60%), despite a positive SLN, had no metastatic nodes on final pathological analysis of their axilla. In addition, 21 (50%) patients with T2 tumors had no metastatic nodes except for a positive SNB. Furthermore, only 6 (8.8%) of T1 tumors with a positive SLN had 4 or more metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Conclusion55.45% of patients with a screen-detected T1/T2 tumor had negative completion lymphadectomy. These findings compel us to re-evaluate the role of axillary dissection in the screen-detected asymptomatic breast cancer population to avoid unnecessary ALND with its attendant morbidities.

Life expectancy of screen‐detected invasive breast cancer patients compared with women invited to the Nijmegen screening program

Screening can lead to earlier detection of breast cancer and thus to an improvement in survival. The authors studied the life expectancy of women with screen-detected invasive breast cancer (patients) compared with women invited to the breast cancer screening program in Nijmegen, the Netherlands (comparison group). Each patient diagnosed between 1975 and 2006 was randomly age-matched with a woman invited in the same calendar year and free from breast cancer at the time of diagnosis of the patient. Survival analyses were performed to study differences in life expectancy. The life expectancy for 858 patients was 6 years shorter than for the comparison group. However, for 360 patients with small (<15 mm) invasive breast cancer, life expectancy was similar to that of the comparison group. In contrast, for patients detected with larger tumors (> or = 15 mm) the life expectancy was 6 to 12 years shorter, depending on tumor size. Furthermore, life expectancy was modified by screening history. For patients who had a negative screening examination 2 years before the detection of their breast cancer, the difference in life expectancy from the comparison group became smaller for the larger tumor sizes (> or = 15 mm). In conclusion, about 40% (360 of 858) of all women with invasive screen-detected breast cancer have the same life expectancy as women from the comparison group (reflecting the general population). For women diagnosed with larger tumors at diagnosis, life expectancy diminishes with increasing tumor size and is modified by screening history.

Establishing treatment benchmarks for mammography‐screened breast cancer population based on a review of evidence‐based clinical guidelines

No benchmarks exist in the screened breast cancer population to establish the optimal proportions of newly detected cancer patients who should receive the ideal treatment. The aim of the study was to estimate the optimal proportion of cases diagnosed in a breast-screening program who should receive treatment according to evidence-based cancer treatment guidelines and to compare these optimal rates with actual treatment rates. METHOD.: Optimal surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy utilization trees were constructed based on indications from evidence-based treatment guidelines. The proportions with clinical attributes that indicated a possible benefit from a particular treatment were obtained from epidemiologic data from BreastScreen Victoria. The optimal proportions of screen-detected breast cancer patients who should receive various therapies were then calculated using TreeAge software and compared with the actual proportions obtained from the epidemiologic data. According to the best available evidence, the proportion of screen-detected breast cancer patients who have attributes suitable for various treatments are: breast-conserving surgery (BCS) 85%, mastectomy 15%, radiotherapy 87%, chemotherapy 34%, and hormonal therapy 68%. The actual BCS utilization rate in Victoria was similar to the optimal rate (79% vs 85%), whereas there appeared to be underuse of radiotherapy (62% vs 87%), chemotherapy (19% vs 34%), and hormonal therapy (49% vs 68%) when compared with guideline recommendations. This research provided optimal treatment utilization rates for screen-detected breast cancer and a comparison of best practice evidence and actual treatment. The results showed comparable rates for surgery but suggested underutilization of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy.

Predictors of invasive breast cancer in DCIS initially diagnosed on core biopsy

The need for completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the sentinel nodes (SNs) is controversial. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to determine if the method of detection of early breast cancer is predictive for additional positive nodes in patients with micrometastases in the SNs.Between 2001 and 2011 a total of 1993 women with primary unilateral breast cancer had surgery at Skåne University Hospital, Lund. Of 1993 patients, 1458 had an SN biopsy and nearly all patients with micro- and macrometastases had ALND.Micrometastases defined as >0.2 mm/>200 cells and ≤2.0 mm were found in 62 of 757 screen-detected patients and in 81 of 701 patients with symptomatic breast cancer. Only 3 of the screen-detected patients with micrometastases, all with tumour size >15 mm (range 18–39 mm), had metastases in the completion ALND whereas this was found in 18 of the symptomatic patients with micrometastases (p = 0.01), (tumour size, range 10–30 mm). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for method of detection, tumour size and histological grade showed 5 times higher odds for further metastases in ALND in patients with symptomatic presentation vs. screen-detected breast cancer.Despite the small number of patients with micrometastases in this large cohort of breast cancer patients, these results support the contention that completion ALND can safely be omitted in screen-detected breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the SNs.

Is the sentinel node biopsy for DCIS patients acceptable?

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG), Z0011 trial, demonstrated that there was no therapeutic benefit from completion lymphadenectomy in early stage breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node (SLN) biopsy. Patients with asymptomatic screen-detected tumors may represent a subgroup where completion axillary dissection with its attendant morbidities is unacceptable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ALND in an asymptomatic screen-detected breast cancer cohort.Patients were recruited from the national screening program which offers women (aged 50 to 65) biannual digital mammography. Over a 1 year period 519 screen-detected breast cancer patients were recruited of which 110 had a positive SLN.Of 519 patients in a national screening program that were clinically/radiologically identified as axillary node negative, 110 (21.2%) had a positive SLN. All 110 (T1 = 68, T2 = 42) patients proceeded to have an axillary clearance. 68 (59%) had T1 tumors and of these 40 (60%), despite a positive SLN, had no metastatic nodes on final pathological analysis of their axilla. In addition, 21 (50%) patients with T2 tumors had no metastatic nodes except for a positive SNB. Furthermore, only 6 (8.8%) of T1 tumors with a positive SLN had 4 or more metastatic axillary lymph nodes.55.45% of patients with a screen-detected T1/T2 tumor had negative completion lymphadectomy. These findings compel us to re-evaluate the role of axillary dissection in the screen-detected asymptomatic breast cancer population to avoid unnecessary ALND with its attendant morbidities.

Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy among patients with high-risk breast cancer detected by mammography screening

Few studies have compared screen-detected (SD) breast cancer patients with symptomatic patients for the frequency and determinants of receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy according to accepted guidelines. Depending on the date of diagnosis, adjuvant therapy guidelines from the 5th, 6th, and 7th St. Gallen International Conferences were used as standards to audit the treatment of 598 node-negative high-risk patients (59% SD) and 430 node-positive patients (40% SD) aged 50-69 years from an Italian cancer registry (1997-2001). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using backward stepwise logistic regression models. Among node-negative high-risk patients, SD cancers were smaller (P = 0.000) and of lower grade (P = 0.003). Downgrading was generally from grade 3 to grade 2, with an increased proportion of patients placed in the high-risk category due to grade 2 alone. The total rates of adjuvant systemic therapy were similar (58 vs. 60%) whereas SD patients were less often treated according to the guidelines (34 vs. 45%; OR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86). After adjustment for tumour size and other weaker confounders, the OR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.67-1.46). Among node-positive patients, the OR of receiving the standard adjuvant systemic therapy did not differ between SD and symptomatic cancers. SD cancers amplified the prognostic heterogeneity of node-negative high-risk patients. Their lower likelihood of being treated according to the guidelines was largely explained by their lower risk profile. No evidence was found to suggest that physicians held a priori assumptions about the relative biological indolence of SD cancers.