Constipation Score Research Articles

Wheat Germ Supplementation Improves Glucose Homeostasis Markers of Overweight Adults Independent of Gut Microbial Modulation

Abstract Objectives This study investigated the effects of wheat germ (WG) supplementation on inflammation, metabolic, and gut health markers in overweight adults. Methods Forty overweight (BMI = 25.0–30 kg/m2) adults between 18–45 y old were recruited to this single-blinded randomized placebo-controlled study. Qualified participants were asked to maintain their normal diet and physical activity and consume energy balls containing 30 g of either WG or cornmeal (control) daily for 4 wks. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters, as well as dietary (3-d food record), medical history, physical activity (Yale Physical Activity Survey), stool measures (Bristol Stool Chart and the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System), gut integrity markers, and fecal bacterial population were assessed at baseline and at the end of the supplementation period. Results Thirty-nine participants completed the 4-week study (n = 20 and 19 for the WG and control group, respectively). There were no differences in the lipid profile, but glycated hemoglobin (P = 0.04), insulin (P = 0.03), and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; P = 0.04) were significantly decreased in the WG but not the control group. Similarly, the adipokine resistin was also significantly reduced (P = 0.03) by WG but not the control. There were no changes in stool characteristics between the two groups before and after supplementation. Similarly, there were no changes in gut bacterial population due to WG supplementation but the phyla Bacteroidetes (P = 0.03) and Proteobacteria (P = 0.048) and the genus Bacteroides (P = 0.03) were significantly decreased in the control group. No significant changes were observed in plasma inflammatory markers, fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations, and markers of gut integrity in both groups. Conclusions Four weeks of WG supplementation improved markers of glucose homeostasis, which can partly be attributed to the reduction of the pro-inflammatory adipokine resistin and not due to changes within the gut (i.e., bacterial population, gut integrity markers, and SCFA production). Our findings indicate that WG may be a safe, effective, and economical approach to improve glucose homeostasis. Funding Sources USDA Award #2019–67,018-29,260 and the Jim and Lynn Williams Professorship.

A step-by-step approach to endorectal proctopexy (ERPP): how we do it.

There are many surgical treatments aimed at correcting internal mucosal prolapse and rectocele associated with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Perineal procedures can be considered as first options in young men in whom an abdominal approach poses risks of sexual dysfunction and in selected women with isolated posterior compartment prolapse who failed conservative treatment. About 20years ago, we described endorectal proctopexy (ERPP) also known as internal Delorme procedure. The aim of the present study was to describe, with attention to technical details and the aid of a video, the different steps of ERPP for the treatment of ODS. A retrospective analysis of our last 100 cases confirms our initial good results. Complications included suture line dehiscence with consequent stricture in four patients (4%). Bleeding occurred in four (4%) patients and was conservatively treated. Transient anal continence impairment consisting of urgency and soiling occurred in 12 (12%) and 6 (6%) patients, respectively. At 6-month follow-up the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score and ODS score improved from a median preoperative value of 18.9 and 18.5 to 5 and 5, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean follow-up was 36.05 ± 13.3 (range 12-58) months and anatomical recurrence rate was 6 (%). Due to its excellent safety profile and the ability to tailor the procedure to different disease presentations, we think that ERPP should be part of the basic armamentarium of all colorectal surgeons operating on the pelvic floor.

Botulinum toxin type-A infiltration of the external anal sphincter to treat outlet constipation in motor incomplete spinal cord injury: pilot cohort study

Background Outlet constipation is a major problem in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We aimed to study the efficacy of external anal sphincter (EAS) infiltration with type-A botulinum toxin (BTX-A) in motor incomplete SCI patients with outlet constipation. Methods Double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, comparative study in 16 motor incomplete SCI subjects. Patients were randomly assigned toreceive100 UI of BTX-A (n = 9) or physiologic serum infiltration (n = 7) in the EAS under electromyographic guidance. Outcome measures included a questionnaire for clinical bowel function evaluation, colonic transit time and anorectal manometry. All assessments were done at baseline, 1 and 3 months after treatment. Results Fourteen patients completed the study. In the BTX-A group we observed an improvement of subjective perception of bowel function (p = 0.01), constipation (p = 0.02) and neurogenic bowel dysfunction score (p = 0.02). The anorectal manometry revealed are duction of EAS voluntary contraction pressure (p = 0.01). No changes were observed in the placebo group. No significant side effects were observed in none of the groups. Conclusion BTX-A infiltration of the EAS is a safe technique that in motor incomplete SCI, decreases the EAS contraction and the anal canal pressure during straining, and improves outlet constipation symptoms. Future studies in larger populations are needed.

Evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation in Parkinson's disease patients with constipation

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and 70–80% of PD patients suffer from gastrointestinal dysfunction such as constipation. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for treating PD related to gastrointestinal dysfunction. We conducted a prospective, single- study. Eleven patients with PD received FMT. Fecal samples were collected before and after FMT and subjected to 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene sequencing. Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) grade, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score, and the Non-Motion Symptom Questionnaire (NMSS) were used to assess improvements in motor and non-motor symptoms. PAC-QOL score and Wexner constipation score were used to assess the patient's constipation symptoms. All patients were tested by the small intestine breath hydrogen test, performed before and after FMT. Community richness (chao) and microbial structure in before-FMT PD patients were significantly different from the after-FMT. We observed an increased abundance of Blautia and Prevotella in PD patients after FMT, while the abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased dramatically. After FMT, the H-Y grade, UPDRS, and NMSS of PD patients decreased significantly. Through the lactulose H2 breath test, the intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in PD patients returned to normal. The PAC-QOL score and Wexner constipation score in after-FMT patients decreased significantly. Our study profiles specific characteristics and microbial dysbiosis in the gut of PD patients. FMT might be a therapeutic potential for reconstructing the gut microbiota of PD patients and improving their motor and non-motor symptoms.

One-year impact of a bowel management program in treating fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations

BackgroundMany patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) need a bowel management program (BMP) to manage lifelong problems of fecal incontinence or severe constipation. We aimed to evaluate the sustainability of the results in such a program. MethodsA single-institution retrospective review was performed in children with ARM who attended our BMP (2015–2019). Standardized definitions and validated tools were used to assess fecal continence (Baylor Continence Scale), constipation (Cleveland Constipation Scoring System), urinary symptoms (Vancouver Symptoms Score), and the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at the start of BMP and 1-year after completion of the program. Results222 patients with ARM at a median age of 6.7 (IQR, 4.9–10.1) years were identified. All (100%) soiled at intake with 149 (67.1%) patients being treated with rectal or antegrade enemas and 73 (32.9%) with oral laxatives. At 1 year 150 (70.4%) were clean, 72.7% were on enemas and 27.3% were on laxatives (p = 0.08). 109 out of 148 (73.6%) patients were clean on enemas. A further 41 out of 66 (62.1%) patients were continent on laxatives with voluntary bowel movements and clean. In the group that was clean, there was improvement in Baylor Continence Scale (25 vs. 13.0, p < 0.000000002), Vancouver (11 vs. 6, p = 0.0110) scores, and clinically relevant improvement in the total PedsQL HRQL (78–85) and the PedsQL HRQL physical function (86–92) and psychosocial domain (77–82). There was no improvement in Cleveland (10 vs. 9, p = 0.31) score. ConclusionAn intensive BMP offers significant benefits in the treatment of fecal incontinence in ARM. It appears to also improve urinary incontinence and urinary voiding as well as the patient's quality of life. These changes are sustainable over at least one year.

Characterization of Patients With Obstructed Defecation and Slow Transit Constipation With a Simulated Stool.

INTRODUCTION:Defecatory disorders including obstructed defecation (OD) are currently diagnosed using specialized investigations including anorectal manometry and the balloon expulsion test. Recently, we developed a simulated stool named Fecobionics that provides a novel type of pressure measurements and analysis. The aim was to study OD phenotypes compared with slow transit constipation (STC) patients and normal subjects (NS).METHODS:Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design. The Fecobionics device contained pressure sensors at the front, rear, and inside a bag. All constipation patients had colon transit study, defecography, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test performed. The Fecobionics bag was distended in the rectum until desire-to-defecate in 26 OD compared with 8 STC patients and 10 NS. Rear-front pressures (preload-afterload parameters) and defecation indices (DIs) were compared between groups.RESULTS:The Wexner constipation scoring system score was 13.8 ± 0.9 and 14.6 ± 1.5 in the OD and STC patients (P > 0.5). The median desire-to-defecate volume was 80 (quartiles 56–80), 60 (54–80), and 45 (23–60) mL in OD, STC, and NS, respectively (P < 0.01). The median expulsion duration was 37 (quartiles 15–120), 6 (3–11), and 11 (8–11) seconds for the 3 groups (P < 0.03). Fecobionics rear-front pressure diagrams demonstrated clockwise loops with distinct phenotype differences between OD and the other groups. Most DIs differed between OD and the other groups, especially those based on the anal afterload reflecting the nature of OD constipation. Several OD subtypes were identified.DISCUSSION:Fecobionics obtained novel pressure phenotypes in OD patients. DIs showed pronounced differences between groups. Larger studies are needed on OD subtyping.

Neratinib\u2009+\u2009capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and\u2009\u2265\u20092 prior HER2-directed regimens

PurposeTo characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study.MethodsIn NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan–Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points.ResultsOf the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63–1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32–2.23]).ConclusionIn NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.

Influence of Locomotion Therapy With the Wearable Cyborg HAL on Bladder and Bowel Function in Acute and Chronic SCI Patients.

Retrospective survey. Purpose of this study was to explore whether bowel and bladder management can be influenced by locomotion therapy with HAL Robot Suit. 35 subjects with acute (< one year since injury, n = 13) or chronic (> one year since injury, n = 22) incomplete paraplegia (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) B, n = 1 / AIS C, n = 22 / AIS D, n = 7) or complete paraplegia (AIS A, n = 5) with zones of partial preservation (ZPP) participated. A retrospective survey was carried out asking for bowel incontinence (Wexner Score), constipation (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System (CCCS)) and bladder function (self-developed questionnaire) before and after completing a training period of 12 weeks with HAL. Wexner Score over all patients and for group of chronic patients decreased significantly. For group of acute patients Wexner Score decreased insignificantly. Patients from both groups with higher baseline scores could decrease significantly. CCCS was insignificantly reduced for all patients, group of acute and group of chronic patients. For subgroup of chronic patients with higher baseline scores, CCCS decreased at end of training period missing out significance. The self-developed questionnaire showed an improvement in bladder function in 28.24% of all patients, 31.43% of chronic patients, and 23.08% of acute patients. Our findings show trends of enhanced bladder and bowel function following exoskeleton training. Patients with higher baseline scores in Wexner Score and CCCS seem to benefit more than those with mild to moderate scores.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IntroductionMost of the patients with rectal prolapse complain of fecal incontinence followed by constipation. Surgery is the only definitive treatment option for rectal prolapse. There are two approaches: either transanal/perineal or transabdominal. The abdominal procedures can be done in the open laparotomy method or laparoscopically. Suture rectopexy is a very old and popular method of treating rectal prolapse. Nowadays, rectopexy by laparoscopic approach is considered the gold standard treatment for rectal prolapse. The study has been conducted to compare both the procedures and their outcomes in terms of conditions associated with rectal prolapse.MethodsAll consecutive patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse who had attended the surgery outpatient department were included in the study. The patients had undergone either open suture rectopexy or laparoscopic rectopexy after randomization. Assessment of postoperative pain, mean days of hospital stay, constipation, and incontinence score along with operative time, recurrence within six months of follow-up, and time to resume bowel activity were done. The patients were followed up for 18 months at regular intervals.ResultsA total of 58 patients were included in the study: 27 in the open group and 31 in the laparoscopic group. The operative time was 102 minutes versus 129 minutes (p=0.0001) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The laparoscopic group had an earlier resumption of bowel activity (3.1 days vs. 1.4 days [p=0.0001]); fewer days of hospital stay (6.8 days vs. 2.5 days [p=0.0001]), less postoperative pain (mean visual analogue scale score for pain on postoperative day one 4.0 versus 3.1 [p=0.0035] and on postoperative day two 3.8 versus 2.2 [p=0.0001]). There was no significant difference in postoperative constipation score and incontinence score between the two groups.ConclusionLaparoscopic rectopexy results in lesser postoperative pain, lesser hospital stay, and better patient satisfaction than open rectopexy.

Xiaoyao-san, a traditional Chinese herbal formula, for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder which has considerable effect to patient's quality of life and social functioning. Its main symptoms include recurrent abdominal pain and/or bloating associated with abnormal stool form or frequency. The recommendable treatment of IBS is a medication including loperamide, cimetropium, tricyclic antidepressants, and selective serotonin receptor inhibitors, but it has limited effects and several side effects dissatisfy IBS patients. As an alternative therapy, Xiaoyao-san (XYS) is gaining interest for IBS patients. XYS, a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has wide scope of indications and it can be prescribed for various gastrointestinal disorders in TCM syndromes but there has been no systematic review on IBS. Therefore, this review aims on systematically validating the curative effect of XYS on IBS.Methods:Electronic databases, manual search, and contact to author e-mail will be used for searching randomized controlled trials about the use of XYS for IBS. We will select studies by the predefined criteria and collect the data on study participants, interventions, control groups, outcome measurement, adverse events, and risk of bias. Primary outcome will be the efficacy rate, and secondary outcomes will be the IBS-centered indices (abdominal pain score, abdominal distension score, diarrhea or constipation score, bowel symptom severity scale), index about quality of life, and adverse events. Review Manager software and Cochrane Collaboration “risk of bias” tools will be used for meta-analysis and assessment of risk of bias.Results:This review will identify the clinical evidence of XYS's effectiveness and safety for IBS according to formal evaluation aspects.Conclusion:This review will further support the evidence-based usage of XYS for IBS treatment.Ethics and dissemination:No ethical approval is required since there is no personal information collection and patient recruitment.Trial registration number:Research Registry; reviewregistry986.

Translation and validation of the traditional Chinese version of the Constipation Severity Instrument.

The Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI) is a well-validated measure for assessing constipation severity. At present, no translated traditional Chinese version of the scale is available. We aimed to develop a traditional Chinese version of the CSI and to validate the translated version. The CSI questionnaire was translated into traditional Chinese language, followed by linguistic validation. It was tested on 45 constipated patients and 55 controls from colorectal outpatient clinics and volunteers. A retest was performed in a subgroup of 39 patients 2 weeks later. Convergent validation was assessed using the Cleveland constipation scoring system (CSS) and quality of life was assessed with the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12). The reliability and validity were assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the Spearman correlation test. Cronbach's α coefficient for the CSI total score and its three subscale scores were all above 0.93. Test-retest reliability was good for the CSI total score (ICC = 0.865) and its three subscale scores (ICC = 0.709-0.882). The constipated participants could be effectively differentiated from the controls based on the CSI total score and its three subscales. The convergent validation was good between the CSI and CSS (Spearman's ρ = 0.711, p < 0.001). The CSI score correlated negatively with the physical composite score and mental composite score of the SF-12 quality of life scale, indicating poorer quality of life in constipated patients. We demonstrated the reliability and validity of the traditional Chinese version of the CSI, which could be a standardized tool for future studies on constipation.

Obstructed defecation syndrome associated with paradoxical puborectalis contraction: osteopathic treatment versus anal biofeedback. Results of a pilot study.

Biofeedback is the most widespread rehabilitative therapy for the treatment of anismus after failed conservative treatment. Osteopathy represents an alternative therapy for constipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of osteopathic treatment as compared to biofeedback in patients with dyssynergic defecation. This was a prospective cohort pilot study on 30 patients with dyssynergic defecation enrolled at the Colorectal Clinic of the University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy, from May 2015 to May 2016 and followed until May 2020. Dyssynergic defecation was defined as the inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor or less than 20% relaxation of basal resting sphincter pressure (on anal manometry) with adequate propulsive forces during attempted defecation. Dyssynergic patients were divide into 2 treatment groups: 15 patients had osteopathy and 15 patients had biofeedback. Before and 3months after rehabilitation treatment, all patients had anorectal manometry, defecography, and ultrasound, and were evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) constipation score, obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Colo-rectal-anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7), and the Brusciano Score (BS). To evaluate the efficacy of osteopathy and biofeedback in the long-term, all patients completed the above-mentioned questionnaires 5years later via a telephone interview. The two treatments were similarly effective in the short term with reduction in questionnaires scores, and increase in the percentage of anal sphincter release at straining at anorectal manometry in both groups. The ODS score was significantly reduced in biofeedback group (p = 0.021). The 3-month post-treatment BS was lower in the osteopathy group, but this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.050). Periodic rehabilitation reinforcements were provided. The CCF constipation score decreased significantly in the osteopathy group (p = 0.023) after 5years. Osteopathy is a promising treatment for dyssynergic defecation, and it can be associated with biofeedback.

Functional fecal and urinary outcomes after sacrococcygeal mass resection in pediatric patients

BackgroundSacrococcygeal masses (SCM) are uncommon in children. The purpose of this study is to review the functional fecal and urinary outcomes following resection of SCM and to determine the impact of a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) on these outcomes. MethodsA retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent SCM resection between 1979 and 2019. Baylor Social Continence Scale (BCS), Vancouver Symptom Score (VSS) and Cleveland constipation score (CSS) surveys were used to assess fecal and urinary continence at time of most recent follow up. Age, tumor characteristics, histopathology, and type of anorectal malformations (ARM), if present, were also recorded. Results75 patients were included. 51 (69%) patients were females and 23 (31%) had an associated ARM. The median age at resection was 8.5 months (IQR 0–26.8). 41 (56%) patients were followed in the MDC. 27 (82%) of patients seen in the MDC were clean for stool and 26 (87%) were dry for urine, while only 17 (59%) of patients not seen in the MDC were clean for stool and dry for urine (p<0.05). There was improvement in Baylor, Vancouver and Cleveland scores. ConclusionsA multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients following SCM resection may improve bowel and bladder outcomes.

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus posterior sutured rectopexy for management of complete rectal prolapse.

To evaluate comparative outcomes of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy (LMR) and laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy (LPSR) in patients with rectal prolapse. We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases and bibliographic reference lists with application of a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary search adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators, and limits. Recurrence, Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), surgical site infections, procedure time, and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome measures. We identified 5 comparative studies reporting a total of 307 patients evaluating outcomes of LMR (n=160) or LPSR (n=147) in patients with rectal prolapse. LMR was associated with significantly lower recurrence rate (OR: 0.28, P=0.009) but longer procedure time (MD: 23.93, P<0.0001) compared to LPSR. However, there was no significant difference in CCIS (MD: -1.02, P=0.50), CCCS (MD: -1.54, P=0.47), surgical site infection (OR: 1.48, P=0.71), and length of hospital stay (MD: -1.54, P=0.47) between two groups. No mesh erosion was reported in any of the included studies at maximum follow-up point. Sub-group analyses with respect to ventral mesh rectopexy, posterior mesh rectopexy, randomised studies, and adult patients were consistent with the main analysis. LMR seems to be associated with lower recurrence but longer procedure time compared to LPSR. Although no mesh-related complications have been reported by the included studies, no definitive conclusions can be made considering that the included studies were inadequately powered for such outcome. Future high-quality randomised studies with adequate sample size are required.

Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy (LVMR) for Internal and External Rectal Prolapse: An Analysis of 122 Consecutive Patients.

Even though several reports have been published on the results of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in Asia, there are few mid-term or long-term results of LVMR. The authors aimed to evaluate the results of LVMR in patients with internal rectal prolapse (IRP) external rectal prolapse (ERP). From September 2013 to January 2019, 122 patients with IRP (n=48) or ERP (n=74) underwent LVMR. Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) scores were evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Florida score preoperatively and postoperatively. The questionnaire for the change of obstructed defecation or FI symptoms after surgery was also administered to grade the results as cured, improved, unchanged, or worsened for each survey. The mean age of the patients was 61.9 years. The mean operation time was 116.5 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 5.1 days. The mean follow-up was 42.1 months. There were no mesh-related complications. Eight patients (10.7%) among the ERP group required additional surgery for recurrent full-thickness prolapse. Eleven patients (14.7%) who had mucosal prolapse within 2 cm underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy after LVMR. In the postoperative 6-month period, the overall constipation score (7.12) significantly improved compared with the preoperative score (13.03) (P<0.001), whereas the FI score significantly improved after surgery (12.16 to 8.92; P<0.001). LVMR is a feasible and safe technique and favorable recurrence for ERP. Functional outcomes of obstructed defecation and FI were improved and the satisfaction of LVMR was high after the surgery. LVMR can be considered a recommended surgical option to treat ERP and IRP.

Early definitive operation for patients with anorectal malformation was associated with a better long-term postoperative bowel function.

In general, patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) undergo surgical treatment at around 6months of age in Japan. We aimed to clarify whether the timing of a definitive operation affects the long-term bowel function. Patient data were collected from 1984 to 2007. Fifty-two male patients with high- and intermediate-type ARM were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups based on their operative period: the early group (EG) underwent anorectoplasty at < 5months of age (n = 22); the late group (LG) underwent anorectoplasty at ≥ 5months (n = 30). The bowel function was evaluated at 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11years of age using the evacuation score (ES) of the Japan Society of Anorectal Malformation Study Group. The total score and four functional outcomes improved chronologically with age. The constipation score in the EG showed significantly better improvement in comparison to the LG. The total score and the incontinence score in the EG were significantly higher than those in the LG at 11years of age. The long-term bowel function in the EG was better than that in the LG. Anorectoplasty at an early age was important for achieving a better postoperative bowel function in ARM patients.

Efficacy of oral magnesium therapy in the treatment of chronic constipation in spastic cerebral palsy children: a randomized controlled trial.

Constipation is a common problem in children with spastic cerebral palsy (sCP) with a prevalence that reaches 75%. We hypothesized that treating constipation in those children will improve their health and shorten time spent in daily care. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral magnesium sulfate for treating chronic constipation in children with sCP. A prospective, double-blinded randomized control trial was carried out involving 100 children aged 2-12years with sCP (level III-V of the Gross Motor Functional Classification system) and chronic constipation. They were followed up in the Pediatric neurology clinic, Children's hospital, Ain Shams University, May 2017- January 2019. The intervention group (O-Mg) received oral magnesium sulfate 1mL/kg/day daily for 1month compared to the placebo. Outcome measures were constipation improvement and decrease in bowel evacuation time after 1month. Initially, weekly bowel movements, constipation scores and stool consistency were comparable in both groups. After 1 month of regular administration of oral magnesium sulfate, the constipation score, stool frequency and consistency improved compared to the placebo group (P < 0.001). Effective safe treatment was achieved in 31 (68%) and 4 (9.5%) patients in the O-Mg and placebo groups, respectively (RR, 2.95; 95% CI 2.0-4.5) (P < 0.001). Painful bowel evacuation attempts spent by mothers decreased from 25 (55.6%) of the cases initially to 10 (22%) cases after onemonth in the O-Mg group (P = 0.001). In contrast, in the placebo group, the decrease went from 21 (50%) cases initially to 18 (42.9%) after 1month and was not significant (P = 0.5). Oral magnesium sulfate seems effective in alleviating chronic constipation and pain experience in children with sCP. Consequently, saving maternal time spent in daily bowel evacuation attempts.

Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse.

Robot-assisted surgery is safe and effective to treat the complex pelvic organs prolapse (C-POP). The present study analyzes all the robotic procedures and their advantages in the treatment of C-POP performed in a Proctologic and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre. All the patients affected by C-POP who had robot-assisted surgery were retrospective analyzed. The anatomical and functional outcomes were respectively evaluated through POP-Q grading system and Wexner score about constipation and incontinence. The satisfaction rate was investigated using a five-point scale. From September 2014 to December 2018, 229 women underwent robotic surgery. The follow-up was 12months. There were no robot-related complications. One hematoma (4.5%) of the recto-vaginal space occurred after Robotic Ventral Rectopexy with Folded Mesh (R-VRP-FM). In the robotic assisted lateral suspension (R-ALS) group there was one case of anterior vaginal wall mesh exposure (0.9%). After the robotic ventral rectopexy (R-VRP) the recurrence rate of external rectal prolapse, internal rectal prolapse, rectocele and enterocele was respectively 6.6, 9.5, 7.4 and 9.5%. After R-VRP-FM only one cystocele (14%) and one partial rectal prolapse (25%) recurred. Vaginal bulge symptoms resolution rate was 95.4%. The mean Wexner constipation score significantly decreased after R-VRP and R-VRP-FM. Vaginal bulge symptoms improved in 98.3% of cases with any apical prolapse recurrence after robotic abdominal colposacropexy. Success rate after R-ALS was 99.1% and 96.4% for apical and anterior prolapse respectively. Robotic assistance makes some surgical steps easier and more precise and this may result in less morbidity and better results.

The Effect of Chemotherapy on Quality of Life of the Patients with Metastatic Gastric and Colorectal Cancer

Objective: The self-administered questionnaires by the patients are among the most important methods to evaluate the patient’s health related quality of life. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on quality of life of the patients receiving palliative chemotherapy with the diagnosis of metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer by using EORTC QLQ-C30. Methods: This study included 100 patients who were treated with palliative chemotherapy for the diagnosis of metastatic gastric or colorectal cancer in İzmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology between 2011-2012. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was filled twice by the patients before chemoterapy started and after chemotherapy completed. Results: When the two questionnaires were compared, it was found that global health status and physical functioning did not change after the chemotherapy. Role functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning impaired but emotional functioning improved (p&lt;0.05). After the chemoterapy, scores of fatigue and constipation decreased but financial difficulties increased (p&lt;0.05). The symptom scores of nausea-vomitting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, diarrhea did not change. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that a quality of life assessment with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire would be beneficial in patients with metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer. In this way, impairments in functional scores, global health status and symptom scores that may occur after chemotherapy can be detected, clinicians can be helped to decide on the switch to chemotherapy regimens that are similar in effectiveness but have different side effects profile, the patients’ quality of life can be improved as a result of the application of the necessary palliative treatments.

Validity and Reliability of the Hindi Version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire in Cancer Patients on Opioids for Pain Management at Tertiary Care Center, India.

Background:Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) causes a significant worsening of quality of life (QOL). The patient assessment of constipation QOL questionnaire (PAC-QOL) is a validated scale in English language to assess the QOL in patients with chronic constipation and guide the management by measuring response to a targeted therapy.Objective:The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of PAC-QOL questionnaire after translation in Hindi language for Indian cancer patients with OIC.Materials and Methods:This was a prospective observational cross-sectional study. Three hundred and thirteen adult cancer patients receiving opioid treatment for pain and experiencing self-reported symptoms of constipation were evaluated. The severity of constipation was assessed at baseline and at an interval of at least 2 weeks by the physician using constipation scoring system (CSS) and self-reported Hindi version of PAC-QOL questionnaire.Results:The data obtained from 313 patients were taken for analysis. The internal consistency of the tool was established with the favorable value of Cronbach's alfa coefficient (i.e., >0.70) obtained for all four subgroups and overall score. The intraclass correlation coefficient value of >0.70 also established good correlation between overall and subgroups scores of Hindi version of PAC-QOL, obtained at 1st and 2nd visit. It was observed from the result that a significant correlation existed between the overall and subgroups scores of Hindi version of PAC-QOL and CSS, thus establishing concurrent validity.Conclusion:It was concluded from the study results that Hindi version of PAC-QOL is both reliable and valid to assess the QOL in patients with OIC.