Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Research Articles

Changes in Physical Function After Long Corrective Fusion to the Ilium for Adult Spinal Deformity

Study Design. Prospective cohort study. Objective. To investigate longitudinal changes in physical functional status after long corrective fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) during 2 years of follow-up. Summary of Background Data. In ASD surgery, reports assessing physical functional status in long-term observations for more than a year are lacking. Assessing whether patients maintain significant improvements in their physical status with a longer follow-up duration is crucial. Methods. A total of 70 female patients with ASD who underwent long corrective fusion of ≥ 7 segments between June 2016 and June 2022 were included in this study. Preoperative and postoperative assessments (at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years) included radiographic spinopelvic parameters, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire, and physical function tests conducted by a physical therapist. Results. All domains of the SRS-22 improved the most in the first 6 months after surgery (P <0.0001); however, the Pain and Function domains continued to improve gradually until 2 years postoperatively. Regarding trunk dynamic balance, the timed up-and-go test score improved gradually until 2 years postoperatively (P <0.0001). Regarding gait performance, gait speed and the 6-minute walking test improved the most in the first 6 months after surgery (P <0.01) and almost reached a plateau 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions. Long corrective fusion for ASD significantly enhanced physical function and HRQOL within 2 years, with the greatest improvement in the first 6 months after surgery. These findings underscore the importance of increasing activities of daily living through early exercise instruction, as well as preventive measures to avoid early surgery-related complications. Level of Evidence. 3

Long-term outcomes of spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common form of spinal deformity in the younger population. The surgical management for these patients improved constantly over the last year and might not be comparable to modern treatment strategies. However, under this aspect the present investigation updates and discusses current evidence regarding the long-term outcome of the surgical management of AIS. All the clinical studies which evaluated the long-term outcomes of spinal fusion were considered. Level of evidence, clinical and radiological data, results of health-related questionnaires and surgery-associated complications during long-term follow-up, e.g., proximal and distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), are presented. Data concerning the following patient-reported outcomes measures were collected: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcome Questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS), and short form-12 and 36 (SF-12/SF-36). Overall, data from 1115 patients were included. Of them, 324 underwent anterior and 791 posterior spinal fusion. One study focuses on a combined anterior/posterior fusions. The mean follow-up was 22.6 years (posterior fusion: 24.6 years, anterior fusion: 18.31 years). Seven studies focus on the thoracic segments, while 12 focus on the lumbar spine. Data on imaging was reported in 13 studies and those on PROMs in 15 investigations. In conclusion, there is low quality and paucity of long-term data on AIS. However, the long-term results of the implicated studies on AIS patients in this review appear to be satisfactory, although there are limitations in the outcome compared to healthy comparison cohorts. Adjacent degenerations appear to be the most common mechanical complication after long-segment fusions, despite their influence on the outcome remains unclear. With regard to pregnancies, there are slightly increased cesarean section rates, which could be explained by deviations in the sagittal profile.

Characteristics of back pain in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Considerations in candidates for corrective surgery

BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that the point prevalence of back pain ranges from 12% to 33% and that the lifetime prevalence of back pain ranges from 28% to 51% in adolescents. However, few studies on back pain in patients with Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been conducted, and these studies had significant limitations, including a lack of comparative controls and detailed information about scoliotic deformity or pain location. This study aimed to determine whether adolescents with AIS experience back pain in specific regions. MethodsThis retrospective case-control study included 189 female adolescents with AIS who underwent corrective fusion from 2008–2020. Questionnaires on back pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22 (SRS-22) were conducted preoperatively. The control group included 2,909 general female adolescents. ResultsThe mean Cobb angles in the main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves were 51.4±15.3° and 40.4±12.9°. Back pain characteristics included higher point prevalence (25.9%) and lifetime prevalence (64.6%) compared to healthy controls. Adolescents with back pain showed lower scores in the pain and mental health domains of the SRS-22. Adolescents with major thoracic AIS showed more back pain in the upper and middle right back compared to adolescents with major thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS. ConclusionThe point and lifetime prevalence of back pain were definitely higher in patients with AIS, which affected their HRQOL. There was a relationship between pain around the right scapula and the right major thoracic curve with a rib hump deformity.

Outcome of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society outcome questionnaire

Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a structural deformity of the spine. Posterior deformity correction represents the gold standard of the surgical treatment of AIS. The fixation technique was shifted from hybrid fixation to the all pedicle screw construct, which could produce superior deformity correction. Patient-oriented outcome questionnaires have become an important measure of the success of surgical correction. This study was conducted to assess the outcome of all pedicle screw constructs in treating AIS using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-24 outcome questionnaire. Patients and methods Seventy-nine AIS patients were included with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical and radiographic measurements were evaluated at preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up periods. Complications and results of the SRS-24 questionnaire were analyzed. Sex, Lenke classification, levels of the lowest instrumented vertebra, curve magnitude, and percentage of curve correction were correlated with the SRS-24 questionnaire results. Results There were 59 females and 20 males. The mean age of the patients was 14.2 ± 2.5 years. According to Lenke classification, the majority of the curves were type 1 (57 patients), followed by type 5 (11 patients), type 2 (six patients), type 3 (three patients), type 6 (two patients), and no type 4. The mean preoperative major curve Cobb angle was 59.3 ± 9.045° and the mean postoperative Cobb angle was 5.82 ± 5.932°. The average score for SRS-24 was 4.17. The mean preoperative pain score was 3.29, which improved to 4.30 after at least 2 years of follow-up (P˂0.005). Statistically significant improvement was seen in the general self-image, function from back condition, and level of activity. After surgery, the mean score for self-image was 4.19, and for function was 3.55. The postoperative function was the lowest, while the postoperative satisfaction score was the best of all domains, with a mean score of 4.55. About 90% of patients were satisfied with the results of their surgical correction. Magnitude of curve and amount of correction did not significantly alter the SRS scores. Conclusion All pedicle screw construct is an efficient and safe method in AIS correction. The surgical treatment in our AIS patients has resulted in a perceived benefit in all domains of SRS-24 questionnaire.

What is the effect of preoperative depression on outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity? A prospective cohort analysis.

Depression has been implicated with worse immediate postoperative outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction, yet the specific impact of depression on those patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) requires further clarity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of depression in the recovery of patients with ASD after undergoing MIS. Patients who underwent MIS for ASD with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year were included from a prospectively collected, multicenter registry. Two cohorts of patients were identified that consisted of either those affirming or denying depression on preoperative assessment. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22), SF-36 physical component summary, SF-36 mental component summary (MCS), EQ-5D, and EQ-5D visual analog scale. Twenty-seven of 147 (18.4%) patients screened positive for preoperative depression. The nondepressed cohort had an average of 4.83 levels fused, and the depressed cohort had 5.56 levels fused per patient (p = 0.267). At 1-year follow-up, 10 patients still reported depression, representing a 63% decrease. Postoperatively, both cohorts demonstrated improvement in their PROMs; however, at 1-year follow-up, those without depression had statistically better outcomes based on the EQ-5D, MCS, and SRS-22 scores (p < 0.05). Patients with depression continued to experience higher NRS leg scores at 1-year follow-up (3.63 vs 2.22, p = 0.018). After controlling for covariates, the authors found that depression significantly impacted only 1-year follow-up MCS scores (β = 8.490, p < 0.05). Depressed and nondepressed patients reported similar improvements after MIS surgery, except MCS scores were more likely to improve in nondepressed patients.

Could trochanteric pelvic stabilization be removed from the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace? A prospective pilot study.

Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common musculoskeletal deformity in children. There is a dose-response relationship between compliance and improvement in scoliosis. The literature revealed that esthetic considerations have negative consequences on the quality of life (QOL) of patients and consequently on wearing time of the brace. To minimize esthetic problems and then increase QOL and wearing time, we proposed a new relay brace named "corset Collerette" without a pelvic-trochanteric base. A prospective cohort study was conducted in the rehabilitation department of Bordeaux University Hospital. Patients consulting for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were registered in a prospective hospital database. The patients expressing unwillingness to wear the usual brace or who had decreased compliance were offered the corset Collerette and were included in a 3-month follow-up. Outcome measures assessed at baseline and at 3 months were Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) and Brace Questionnaire scales and wearing time. Cobb's angle evolution since the start of bracing was also collected. The primary end point was the QOL assed by the SRS-22 scale at 3 months of follow-up. The first 38 patients agreeing to wear the corset Collerette were included in the study. The QOL assessed by the SRS-22 was significantly improved with the corset Collerette ( p < 0.05). There was no significant increase in wearing time and thoracic Cobb's angles between baseline and follow-up ( p > 0.05). The switch to the corset Collerette allowed an improvement in the QOL of the patients and avoid a decrease in compliance with wearing the brace and maintain the same in-brace Cobb's angles.

Operative strategies for ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis: focus on the cervical stiffness, coronal imbalance and hip involvement

BackgroundCervical stiffness, coronal imbalance and limited hip movement all play crucial roles in designing the corrective surgery for ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis (AS-TLK). However, a comprehensive classification and tailored strategies for directing clinical work are lacking. This study aims to investigate the types and surgical strategies for AS-TLK that consider cervical stiffness, coronal imbalance and hip involvement as the key factors.Methods25 consecutive AS-TLK patients were divided into three types according to their accompanying features: Type I: with a flexible cervical spine; Type IIA: with a stiff cervical spine; Type IIB: with coronal imbalance; Type IIC: with limited hip movement. Type III is the mixed type with at least two conditions of Type II. Individual strategies were given correspondingly. Spinal-pelvic-femoral parameters were measured, Scoliosis Research Society outcome instrument-22 (SRS-22) was used and complications were recorded and analysed.ResultsAll patients (Type I 10, Type II 8 and Type III 7) underwent surgery successfully. 13 cases with 16 complications were recorded and cured. The patients were followed up for 24–65 months with an average of 33.0 ± 9.6 months. Both the sagittal and coronal parameters were corrected and decreased significantly (all, p < 0.05). SRS-22 scores showed a satisfactory outcome.ConclusionThoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis are complex and variable. Considering the factors of cervical stiffness, coronal imbalance and hip involvement assists in making decisions individually and achieving a desired surgical result.

Mini-open Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy versus Standard Posterior Approach for Ankylosing Spondylitis-related Spinal Kyphosis: A Comparative Study.

Surgical strategy for spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been challenging. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) through a minimally invasive (MI) approach has been developed with promising clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PSO via an MI approach and a standard posterior approach (SPA) for treating AS-related spinal kyphosis. A total of 41 patients with AS-related spinal kyphosis who underwent PSO through an MI approach (MI surgery [MIS] group: n = 25) or SPA (SPA group: n = 16) between January 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively included. Spinopelvic parameters were evaluated before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up. Clinical data including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, level of fusion, incision length, bed rest period, length of hospitalization, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument-22 (SRS-22) was administered to assess patients' quality of life at the latest follow-up. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using independent sample t-test or Chi-square test. Characteristics and baseline kyphosis of the two groups were matched. At the 2-year follow-up, in the MIS group, the average correction values of the sagittal vertical axis and global kyphosis (GK) were 9.5 cm and 44.3°, respectively. Compared with the SPA group, the MIS group had similar correction values and correction losses after surgery. No obvious differences were observed in any radiographic parameters, except for GK, immediately after surgery and at the 2-year follow-up between the two groups (p > 0.05). The MIS group had a significantly shorter operative time, lesser blood loss, lesser transfusion volume, shorter fusion level, and lesser time to mobilization than did the SPA group. Higher average functional activity scores of SRS-22 were obtained in the MIS group than in the SPA group. Mini-open PSO may be an effective alternative to the SPA for treating AS-related spinal kyphosis, with comparable correction effect, lesser surgical trauma and faster recovery. This comparative study may provide valuable guidance for surgical decision-making and patient counseling.

Should realignment goals vary based on patient frailty status in adult spinal deformity?

The objective of this study was to adjust the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) to accommodate frailty in alignment considerations and thereby increase the predictability of clinical outcomes and junctional failure. Surgical adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with 2-year data were included. Frailty was assessed with the continuous ASD modified frailty index (ASD-mFI). Two-year outcomes were proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), major mechanical complications, and best clinical outcome (BCO), defined as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score < 15 and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire total score > 4.5 by 2 years. Linear regression analysis established a 6-week score based on the component scores of SAAS, frailty, and US normal values for ODI score. Logistic regression analysis followed by conditional inference tree run forest analysis generated categorical thresholds. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, baseline deformity, and history of revision, was used to compare outcome rates, and logistic regression generated odds ratios for the continuous score. Thirty percent of the cohort was used as a random sample for internal validation. In total, 412 patients were included (mean ± SD age 60.1 ± 14.2 years, 80% female, BMI 26.9 ± 5.4 kg/m2). Baseline frailty categories were as follows: 57% not frail, 30% frail, and 14% severely frail. Overall, by 2 years, 39% of patients had developed PJK, 8% PJF, and 21% mechanical complications; 22% had undergone a reoperation; and 15% met BCO. When the cohort as a whole was assessed, the 6-week SAAS had a correlation with the development of PJK and PJF, but not mechanical complications, reoperation, or BCO. Development of mechanical complications, PJF, reoperation, and BCO demonstrated correlations with ASD-mFI (all p < 0.05). Regression analysis modifying SAAS on the basis of ODI norms and frailty generated the following equation: frailty-adjusted SAAS (FAS) = 0.108 × T1 pelvic angle + 0.162 × pelvic tilt - 0.39 × pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis - 0.03 × ASD-mFI - 1.6771. With conditional inference tree analysis, thresholds were derived for FAS: aligned < 1.7, offset 1.7-2.2, and severely offset > 2.2. Significance between FAS categories was found for PJK, PJF, mechanical complications, reoperation, and BCO by 2 years. Binary logistic regression, controlling for baseline deformity and revision status, demonstrated significance between FAS and all 5 outcome variables (all p < 0.01). Internal validation saw each outcome variable maintain significance between categories, with even greater odds for PJF (OR 13.4, 95% CI 4.7-38.3, p < 0.001). Consideration of physiological age, in addition to chronological age, may be beneficial in the management of operative goals to maximize clinical outcomes while minimizing junctional failure. This combination enables the spine surgeon to fortify a surgical plan for even the most challenging patients undergoing ASD corrective surgery.

Reliability and validity of an adapted Saudi Arabic version of scoliosis research society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-30) in Saudi Arabia.

To perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Saudi Arabic (SA) version of SRS-30 and test it on Saudi patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data of 322 patients with AIS. The cross-cultural adaptation process was performed using the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Outcomes Committee method. A pre-test analysis was conducted on 30 patients. All patients had completed the SRS-22r and SF-12 preoperatively and 198 patients had completed the SA version of SRS-30 and SF-12 postoperatively twice at six weeks interval. The validity and internal consistency were tested using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach alpha, person correlation coefficient, and confidence interval (CI). There are 288 (89.4%) girls and 34 (10.6%) boys and the average age is 15 ± 2.3years (range from 10-21years). The majority of patients have a Lenke type 1 curve (41%) and only 14% have a Lenke type 5 and 6. The overall Cronbach alpha (CA) of all SRS-30 domains is 0.87. However, the Cronbach alpha for the satisfaction, and function domains slightly lower than the original English questionnaire. The Saudi Arabic version of SRS-30 is a reliable and valid instrument and can be applied to evaluate the quality of life in patients with AIS.

Two-stage treatment for severe spinal kyphotic deformity secondary to tuberculosis: halo-pelvic traction followed by a posterior-only approach correction

Background and purposeSeveral surgical procedures are used to treat tuberculous kyphosis. However, the treatment of extreme spinal kyphosis is challenging, and associated with various complications. Halo traction has been used as an adjunctive method in the treatment of severe spinal deformities. However, there are few reports about the effectiveness of halo-pelvic traction (HPT) for the treatment of extreme spinal kyphosis secondary to tuberculosis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of halo-pelvic traction followed by a posterior-only approach correction in the treatment of severe spinal kyphosis secondary to tuberculosis.MethodsThe records of 19 patients with severe spinal kyphosis secondary to tuberculosis were retrospectively reviewed. All 19 patients were treated with a two-stage approach: HPT combined with posterior fusion surgery by a posterior-only approach. Radiographic parameters were measured and evaluated. America Spinal Injury Association grade (ASIA), Scoliosis Research Society outcome (SRS-22) score, and complications were also evaluated.ResultsThere were 9 males and 10 females, with an average age of 29.7 years at the time of surgery. The average HPT duration was 10.4 weeks. The mean kyphosis angle decreased from 131.40 ± 10.7° pre-traction to 77.1 ± 7.4° post-traction (P < 0.01). The traction correction rate was 41.3%. The mean postoperative kyphosis angle was 65.7 ± 8.5°, and the surgical correction rate was 8.7%. Of the total correction, 82.6% was the result of HPT. At a mean follow-up of 26.5 months, the average kyphosis correction loss was 2.9°. The mean sagittal balance was 11.1 ± 45.2 mm before traction, − 25.0 ± 37.4 mm after traction, 7.0 ± 13 mm after surgery, and 2.8 ± 9.6 mm at the final follow-up. The mean preoperative SRS-22 score was 3.0 and postoperative was 4.2 (P < 0.01). The neurological status of most patients was improved. The total complication rate was 15.7%, including 1 neurological and 2 non-neurological complications.ConclusionsHPT is effective in the management of severe spinal kyphotic deformity secondary to tuberculosis. Preoperative HPT can greatly reduce global kyphosis, and the need for corpectomy.

Determining the relationship between preoperative mental health scores and postoperative outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgeries.

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the mental health domain of the refined 22-item Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Questionnaire (SRS) and various postoperative outcome measures in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. Given the scale and involved nature of deformity surgery, some surgeons have proposed that preoperative mental health scores (MHSs) may assist in screening out poor surgical candidates. In this study, the authors aimed to further assess the SRS MHS as a preoperative metric and its association with postoperative outcomes and to comment on its potential use in patient selection and optimization for ASD surgery. The authors conducted a retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who had undergone primary or revision ASD surgery at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2019. Each patient had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were categorized on the basis of their baseline mental health per the SRS mental health domain, with a score < 4 indicating low baseline mental health (LMH) and a score ≥ 4 indicating high baseline mental health (HMH). Baseline and follow-up SRS and Oswestry Disability Index scores, surgical procedures, lengths of stay, discharge locations, intraoperative or postoperative complications, and other outcome metrics were then compared between the HMH and LMH groups, as well as these groups stratified by an age ≤ 45 and > 45 years. Among patients aged ≤ 45 and those aged > 45, the LMH group had significantly worse baseline health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) metrics in nearly all domains. The LMH group also had an increased median estimated blood loss (EBL; 1200 vs 800 ml, p = 0.0026) and longer average surgical duration (8.3 ± 2.8 vs 6.9 ± 2.6 hours, p = 0.014). Both LMH and HMH groups had significant improvements in nearly all HRQOL measures postoperatively. Despite their worse preoperative HRQOL baseline, patients in the LMH group actually improved the most and reached the same HRQOL endpoints as those in the HMH group. While patients with lower baseline MHSs may require slightly longer hospital courses or more frequent discharges to rehabilitation facilities, these patients actually attain greater absolute improvements from their preoperative baseline and surprisingly have the same postoperative HRQOL metrics as the patients with high MHSs, despite their poorer starting point. This finding suggests that patients with LMH may be uniquely positioned to substantially benefit from surgical intervention and improve their HRQOL scores and thus should be considered for ASD surgery to an extent similar to patients with HMH.

Clinical Results of Utilizing the Satellite Rod Technique in Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis Kyphosis

ObjectiveAccording to the literature, there are no clinical reports documenting the use of the satellite rod technique in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who adopted satellite rods versus those who did not.MethodsPatients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who underwent one or two‐level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) were reviewed, and total of 119 patients (112 males and seven females, average age 39.89 ± 6.61 years) were eligible and included in this present study. Anterior–posterior and lateral full‐length spine X‐ray films were performed preoperatively and at the two‐year follow‐up visit. Global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and osteotomy angle (OA) were measured. The complications of every group of patients were collected. Pre‐ and postoperative health‐related quality of life instruments, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (Basfi) and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument‐22 (SRS‐22), were recorded. The patients were divided into three groups based on features of their osteotomy including PSO levels and whether the satellite rod technique was applied. Patients who underwent one‐level PSO without the satellite rod technique were categorized in the one‐level group. Patients who underwent one‐level PSO with the satellite rod technique were classified in the satellite rod group. Patients who underwent two‐level PSO without the satellite rod technique were included in the two‐level group. The paired sample t test was used to compare pre‐ and postoperative parameters. One‐way ANOVA was performed for multiple group comparisons.ResultsThe average follow‐up time is 29.31 ± 3.66 months. The patients' GK were significantly improved from 46.84 ± 20.37 degree to 3.31 ± 15.09 degree. OS achieved through each osteotomy segment of one‐level group (39.78 ± 12.29 degree) and satellite rods group (42.23 ± 9.82 degree), was larger than that of two‐level group (34.73 ± 7.54 and 28.85 ± 7.26 degree). There was no significant difference between the one‐level group and the satellite rod group in achieving the OS. Thirteen patients experienced different complications (10.92%). Three patients experienced rod fracture in the one‐level group. There was no rod fracture or screw failure in the satellite rod group or the two‐level group.ConclusionThe satellite rod technique is also recommended for patients who undergo PSO osteotomy to correct ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis deformities.

The Function Assessment Scale for Spinal Deformity: Validity and Reliability of a New Clinical Scale.

Cross-sectional study. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Function Assessment scale for Spinal Deformity (FASD). Spinal malalignment impacts daily functioning. Standard evaluation of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is based on static radiography and patient-reported scores, which fail to assess functional impairments. A clinical scale, quantifying function and balance of patients with ASD, could increase our insights on the impact of ASD on functioning. To develop the FASD, 70 ASD patients and 20 controls were measured to identify the most discriminating items of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Trunk Control Measurement Scale. Discussions between experts on the clinical relevance of selected items led to further item reduction. The FASD's discriminative ability was established between 43 patients and 19 controls, as well as between three deformity subgroups. For its responsiveness to treatment, 10 patients were reevaluated 6 months postoperatively. Concurrent validity was assessed through correlation analysis with radiographic parameters (pelvic tilt; sagittal vertical axis [SVA]; pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]; coronal vertical axis) and patient-reported scores [Oswestry Disability Index]; Scoliosis Research Society outcome questionnaire; Falls Efficacy Scale-International). Test-retest and interrater reliability were tested on two groups of ten patients using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Patients with ASD, mainly with sagittal malalignment, scored worse compared to controls on FASD (P < 0.001) and its subscales. No significant improvement was observed 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.758). FASD correlated significantly to all patient-reported scores and to SVA and PI-LL. Reliability between sessions (ICC = 0.97) and raters (ICC = 0.93) was excellent. Subscales also showed good to excellent reliability, except FASD 1 on "spinal mobility and balance" between sessions (ICC = 0.71). FASD proved to be a valid and reliable clinical scale for evaluation of functional impairments in ASD. Objective information on function and balance might ultimately guide physiotherapeutic treatment toward improved functioning.Level of Evidence: 2.

An innovative adjustable prone positioning frame for treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis with two-level osteotomy.

This study aims to introduce an innovative adjustable prone positioning frame (APPF) and explore its feasibility and safety for treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with two-level osteotomy. A retrospective, non-controlled study was conducted to illustrate the process where 13 patients diagnosed with severe kyphosis secondary to AS received operations on the APPF. Parameters of chin brow vertical angle (CBVA), global kyphosis (GK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. Positioning time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss aḥd complications were also determined. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument (SRS-22) was applied for clinical assessment. All patients were placed on the APPF successfully with the positioning time of 2.92 ± 0.76min, received operation with 457.00 ± 88.04min and had blood loss of 2330.77 ± 1423.25ml. Four cases experienced pain due to tensional skin of the abdomen and one case suffered cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively, but these patients were all cured conservatively. No neurological complications were observed, although sagittal translation occurred in four patients. Significant improvements were detected in CBVA, GK, TLK, LL and SVA postoperatively (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between postoperation and the final follow-up (P>0.05). The SRS-22 scores at 2 years after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). The innovative APPF provided great convenience to place patients with severe kyphosis secondary to AS in a prone position. Performing two-level osteotomy with the aid of APPF is safe, feasible and effective.

Patient-related and radiographic predictors of inferior health-related quality-of-life measures in adult patients with nonoperative spinal deformity.

Patients with nonoperative (N-Op) adult spinal deformity (ASD) have inferior long-term spinopelvic alignment and clinical outcomes. Predictors of lower quality-of-life measures in N-Op populations have yet to be sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to identify patient-related factors and radiographic parameters associated with inferior health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) scores in N-Op ASD patients. N-Op ASD patients with complete radiographic and outcome data at baseline and 2 years were included. N-Op patients and operative (Op) patients were propensity score matched for baseline disability and deformity. Patient-related factors and radiographic alignment parameters (pelvic tilt [PT], sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic incidence [PI]-lumbar lordosis [LL] mismatch, mismatch between cervical lordosis and T1 segment slope [TS-CL], cervical-thoracic pelvic angle [PA], and others) at baseline and 2 years were analyzed as predictors for moderate to severe 2-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI > 20) and failing to meet the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) for 2-year Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS) scores (< 0.4 increase from baseline). Conditional inference decision trees identified predictors of each HRQOL measure and established cutoffs at which factors have a global effect. Random forest analysis (RFA) generated 5000 conditional inference trees to compute a variable importance table for top predictors of inferior HRQOL. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Six hundred sixty-two patients with ASD (331 Op patients and 331 N-Op patients) with complete radiographic and HRQOL data at their 2-year follow-up were included. There were no differences in demographics, ODI, and Schwab deformity modifiers between groups at baseline (all p > 0.05). N-Op patients had higher 2-year ODI scores (27.9 vs 20.3, p < 0.001), higher rates of moderate to severe disability (29.3% vs 22.4%, p = 0.05), lower SRS total scores (3.47 vs 3.91, p < 0.001), and higher rates of failure to reach SRS MCID (35.3% vs 15.7%, p < 0.001) than Op patients at 2 years. RFA ranked the top overall predictors for moderate to severe ODI at 2 years for N-Op patients as follows: 1) frailty index > 2.8, 2) BMI > 35 kg/m2, T4PA > 28°, and 4) Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1. Top radiographic predictors were T4PA > 28° and C2-S1 SVA > 93 mm. RFA also ranked the top overall predictors for failure to reach 2-year SRS MCID for N-Op patients, as follows: 1) T12-S1 lordosis > 53°, 2) cervical SVA (cSVA) > 28 mm, 3) C2-S1 angle > 14.5°, 4) TS-CL > 12°, and 5) PT > 23°. The top radiographic predictors were T12-S1 Cobb angle, cSVA, C2-S1 angle, and TS-CL. When controlling for baseline deformity in N-Op versus Op patients, subsequent deterioration in frailty, BMI, and radiographic progression over a 2-year follow-up were found to drive suboptimal patient-reported outcome measures in N-Op cohorts as measured by validated ODI and SRS clinical instruments.

C-Arm-Free Anterior Correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Lenke Type 5C): Analysis of Early Outcomes and Complications

Computer-assisted spinal surgery as a technique for reducing radiation exposure to the operating staff and the complications of spinal deformity are receiving considerable attention. However, no technical reports have described the technique for navigating anterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis without C-arm fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new C-arm-free anterior correction for scoliosis. This study investigated 38 consecutive patients with Lenke type 5C curves who underwent selective lumbar or thoracolumbar fusion, comprising 26 patients with conventional anterior correction surgery, and 12 patients with C-arm-free navigation surgery. The 2 groups were evaluated immediately postoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up. No vascular injuries, screw malpositioning, or major complications were associated with the surgical procedure in either group. Correction rates of the lumbar curve were satisfactory with no significant difference between groups (mean, 82.6% ± 5.7% vs. 80.7% ± 10.2%, respectively). However, mean time for fluoroscopy in group C was 133 ± 9.5 seconds (P < 0.0001). No significant differences in intraoperative blood loss (642 ± 123 mL vs. 731 ± 222 mL, respectively) or surgical time (251 ± 13 min vs. 301 ± 38 min, respectively) were seen between groups. Mean final follow-up Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) was also excellent for both group C (4.2 ± 0.19) and group N (4.3 ± 0.20). C-arm-free anterior correction offers safe, effective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The advantage of this new technique is no radiation exposure for medical staff at centers performing large numbers of spinal procedures.

Physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises performed immediately after spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial

BackgroundSpinal manipulative therapy is commonly used in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Some therapists also rely on physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercise (PSSE). Combining these two modalities seems reasonable, but the effectiveness of this combination has never been rigorously tested. Here, a protocol for a pilot study is proposed to determine the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized trial. The pilot study was designed to test the hypothesis that spinal manipulative therapy followed by PSSE is more effective than PSSE alone in improving the Cobb angle, sensorimotor integration, the angle of trunk rotation (ATR), body symmetry, and quality of life.MethodsThe protocol describes a randomized controlled pilot trial with 40 subjects divided into study and control groups. Both groups will receive 8 weeks of PSSE, but the study group will also receive spinal manipulative therapy during the first 2 weeks before PSSE. The primary outcome will be an estimate of the feasibility of conducting a full-scale experiment. The influencing factors will be the time to complete enrollment, the recruitment rate, subject retention, and adherence to the treatment allocations. The secondary outcomes that will be used to assess the efficacy of treatment will include the Cobb angle, somatosensory evoked potentials, ATR, three-dimensional postural parameters, and scores on the 22-item Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire. The Cobb angle will be measured at baseline and at the end of 8 weeks of training. The somatosensory evoked potentials will be measured at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks of training. The ATR, three-dimensional postural parameters, and scores on the 22-item Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire will be measured at baseline and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of treatment.DiscussionThis study will inform the design of a future full-scale trial. The outcomes will provide preliminary data about the efficacy of the combination of spinal manipulative therapy and exercise in treating scoliosis.Trial registrationProspectively registered at Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR1900027037. Registered on 29 October 2019.http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=44954&htm=4

The function assessment scale for spinal deformity (FASD): Validity and reliability of a new clinical scale

STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate the Function Assessment scale for Spinal Deformity (FASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Spinal malalignment impacts daily functioning. Standard evaluation of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is based on static radiography and patient-reported scores, which fail to assess functional impairments. A clinical scale, quantifying function and balance of patients with ASD, could increase our insights on the impact of ASD on functioning. METHODS To develop the FASD, 70 ASD patients and 20 controls were measured to identify the most discriminating items of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Trunk Control Measurement Scale. Discussions between experts on the clinical relevance of selected items led to further item reduction. The FASD's discriminative ability was established between 43 patients and 19 controls, as well as between three deformity subgroups. For its responsiveness to treatment, ten patients were re-evaluated six months post-operatively. Concurrent validity was assessed through correlation analysis with radiographic parameters (Pelvic tilt; Sagittal vertical axis (SVA); Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL); Coronal vertical axis) and patient-reported scores (Oswestry Disability Index; Scoliosis Research Society outcome questionnaire; Falls Efficacy Scale-International). Test-retest and interrater reliability were tested on two groups of ten patients using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS Patients with ASD, mainly with sagittal malalignment, scored worse compared to controls on FASD (p < 0.001) and its subscales. No significant improvement was observed six months post-operatively (p = 0.758). FASD correlated significantly to all patient-reported scores and to SVA and PI-LL. Reliability between sessions (ICC = 0.97) and raters (ICC = 0.93) was excellent. Subscales also showed good to excellent reliability, except FASD 1 on 'spinal mobility and balance' between sessions (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS FASD proved to be a valid and reliable clinical scale for evaluation of functional impairments in ASD. Objective information on function and balance might ultimately guide physiotherapeutic treatment towards improved functioning.Level of Evidence: 2.

Long-term benefits of appropriately corrected sagittal alignment in reconstructive surgery for adult spinal deformity: evaluation of clinical outcomes and mechanical failures.

It has been well documented that optimal sagittal alignment is highly correlated with good clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, it remains to be determined whether the clinical benefit of appropriately corrected sagittal alignment can be maintained in the long term. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether appropriately corrected sagittal alignment continues to offer benefits over time with regard to clinical outcomes and mechanical failure. Patients older than 50 years who underwent ≥ 4-level fusion for ASD and were followed up for ≥ 5 years were included in this study. Appropriateness of sagittal alignment correction was defined as pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis ≤ 10°, pelvic tilt ≤ 25°, and sagittal vertical axis ≤ 50 mm. Two groups were created based on this appropriateness: group A (appropriate) and group IA (inappropriate). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire-22 (SRS-22). The development of mechanical failures, such as rod fracture and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), was compared between the two groups. The study included 90 patients with a follow-up duration of 90.3 months. There were 30 patients in group A and 60 patients in group IA. The clinical outcomes at 2 years were significantly better in group A than in group IA in terms of the VAS scores, ODI scores, and all domains of SRS-22. At the final follow-up visit, back VAS and ODI scores were still lower in group A than they were in group IA, but the VAS score for leg pain did not differ between the groups. The SRS-22 score at the final follow-up showed that only the pain and self-image/appearance domains and the total sum were significantly higher in group A than in group IA. The incidence of rod fracture and PJK did not differ between the two groups. The rate of revision surgery for rod fracture or PJK was also similar between the two groups. The clinical benefits from appropriate correction of sagittal alignment continued for a mean of 90.3 months. However, the intergroup difference in clinical outcomes between groups A and IA decreased over time. The development of rod fracture or PJK was not affected by the appropriateness of sagittal alignment.