Scientific Registry Of Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Impact of ventricular assist device use on pediatric heart transplant waitlist mortality: Analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.

Children awaiting heart transplant (Tx) have a high risk of death due to donor organ scarcity. Historically, ventricular assist devices (VADs) reduced waitlist mortality, prompting increased VAD use. We sought to determine whether the VAD survival benefit persists in the current era. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified patients listed for Tx between 3/22/2016 and 9/1/2020. We compared characteristics of VAD and non-VAD groups at Tx listing. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for 1-year waitlist mortality. Among 5054 patients, 764 (15%) had a VAD at Tx listing. The VAD group was older with more mechanical ventilation and renal impairment. Unadjusted waitlist mortality was similar between groups; the curves crossed ~90 days after listing (p = .55). In multivariable analysis, infant age (HR 2.77, 95%CI 2.13-3.60), Black race (HR 1.57, 95%CI 1.31-1.88), congenital heart disease (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.04-1.46), renal impairment (HR 2.67, 95%CI 2.19-3.26), inotropes (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.09-1.52), and mechanical ventilation (HR 2.23, 95%CI 1.84-2.70) were associated with 1-year waitlist mortality. VADs were not associated with mortality in the first 90 waitlist days but were protective for those waiting ≥90 days (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.26-0.71). In the current era, VADs reduce waitlist mortality, but only for those waitlisted ≥90 days. The differential effect by race, size, and VAD type is less clear. These findings suggest that Tx listing without VAD may be reasonable if a short waitlist time is anticipated, but VADs may benefit those expected to wait >90 days.

#2348 Paradoxical association of pre-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate with kidney function decline in living kidney donors

Abstract Background and Aims Living kidney donors (LKD) are at risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Whether differences in pre-donation estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) are associated with differences in the rate of post-donation eGFR decline is unclear. We aim to examine the association between pre-donation eGFR and the risk of kidney function decline post-donation. Method A retrospective cohort study using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database included LKD with pre- and early post-donation eGFR as well as eGFR at 6, 12, and 24 months after donation. The association between the quartile (Q) of pre-donation eGFR and time to ≥35% decline in post-donation eGFR compared to pre-donation eGFR was examined by competing-risks survival regression with death serving as a competing risk variable. Results Of 129,943 LKD ≥18 years old undergoing donation between October 1987 and September 2022, mean ± SD age was 42 ± 12 years and 61% were female. Mean overall pre-donation eGFR was 95.76 ± 29.80 mL/min/1.732 and mean pre-donation eGFR of LKD in Q1, 2, 3, and 4 were 63.50 ± 8.86, 83.05 ± 4.53, 100.30 ± 5.72, and 136.22 ± 23.69 mL/min.1.73 m2, respectively (Ptrend <0.001). Compared to pre-donation eGFR, the mean eGFR at early post-donation was significantly decreased to 53.56 ± 39.81 mL/min.1.73 m2 (mean eGFRpost-pre −43.38 mL/min.1.73 m2; P < 0.001), but mean post-donation eGFR at 6, 12, and 24 months continued trending up to 57.58 ± 45.37, 59.28 ± 43.25, and 61.05 ± 42.51 mL/min.1.73 m2, respectively which were significantly greater than early post-donation eGFR (mean eGFR 6mo-post 4.28, eGFR12mo-post 6.01, and eGFR24mo-post 7.82 mL/min.1.73 m2; P < 0.001; Fig. 1). Median survival for ≥35% decline in post-donation eGFR was 6.43 months (5.50, 11.30) with an incidence rate of 0.08 person-months. Among 75,220 LKD with follow-up data, 58,985 (78%) had the event and 15 (0.02%) died. Compared to LKD with pre-donation eGFR in Q1, LKD in other Q had a significantly higher risk for ≥35% decline in post-donation eGFR with a positively graded association (HR (95% CI)Q2 1.28 (1.23, 1.32); HRQ3 1.41 (1.36, 1.46); and HRQ4 1.60 (1.55, 1.65)). After adjusting for age, gender, race, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes, U.S. citizen status, education, and the interaction term between the quartile pre-donation eGFR and race, the magnitude of the association increased but the direction remained (HR (95%C I)Q2 1.41 (1.36, 1.47) HRQ3 1.72 (1.65, 1.79), and HRQ4 2.11 (2.02, 2.20). In addition, race was identified as an effect modifier with an increased risk for ≥35% decline in post-donation eGFR observed in Hispanic/Latino LKD (Pinteraction Q 2, Q3, Q4 0.025, 0.005, and <0.001). Conclusion Higher pre-donation eGFR is associated with a greater risk for post-donation eGFR decline especially among Hispanic/Latino LKD. Candidacy for living kidney donation should not be declined based only on eGFR; while some racial-ethnic minorities may be at greater risk even having higher pre-donation eGFR.

Use of Federal Reimbursement for Living Donor Costs by Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Implications for Disparities in Access to Living Donor Transplantation.

Minority race, ethnicity, and financial barriers are associated with lower rates of living donor (LD) kidney transplantation (LDKT). Financial reimbursement for LD costs may impact social determinants of health and, therefore, impact disparities in access to LDKT. Among US LDKTs, we studied associations between racial and ethnic minority status and utilization of the National Living Donor Assistance Center (NLDAC), a means-tested reimbursement program for nonmedical LD costs. We analyzed demographic, clinical, income, and survey data from NLDAC and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2022) to identify predictors of NLDAC utilization. Among 70 069 US LDKTs, 6093 NLDAC applicants were identified (9% of US LDKTs). Racial and ethnic minorities were over-represented in NLDAC-supported LDKTs compared with non-NLDAC US LDKTs (Black donors 12% versus 9%; Black recipients 15% versus 12%; Hispanic donors 21% versus 14%; Hispanic recipients 23% versus 15%; all P < 0.001). Among preemptive transplants, use of NLDAC by donors to Hispanic recipients (11%) was nearly twice as high as that of non-Hispanic recipients (6%) (P < 0.001). At time of NLDAC application, 72% stated NLDAC "will make it possible" to donate; higher proportions of minority applicants agreed (Black 80%, White 70%, P < 0.001; Hispanic 79%, non-Hispanic 70%, P < 0.001). Racial and ethnic minority-concordant transplants were significantly more likely to use NLDAC (donor/recipient: Black/Black risk-adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.85, other/other OR 2.59, Hispanic/Hispanic OR 1.53; all P < 0.05). Reduction of LD financial barriers may increase access to LDKT, particularly in racial and ethnic minority communities.

Graft Survival of En Bloc Deceased Donor Kidneys Transplants Compared With Single Kidney Transplants.

The US Kidney Allocation System allocates en bloc deceased donor kidney grafts from donors <18 kg in sequence A along with single kidney transplants (SKTs) from kidney donor profile index (KDPI) top 20% donors. Although en bloc grafts outperform SKT grafts holding donor weight constant, it is unclear if en bloc grafts from the smallest pediatric donors perform the same as top 20% KDPI SKTs. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we compared the donor characteristics and graft survival of en bloc grafts from the smallest donors (<8 kg) and from larger donors (≥8 kg) with SKTs by KDPI sequence for transplants performed in 2021. Larger donor en blocs had similar 1-y survival to sequence A SKTs estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (96% versus 96%, P = 0.9), but the smallest donor en blocs had significantly shorter 1-y survival than those SKTs (80% versus 96%, P < 0.01). Using transplants from 2010 to 2012, the smallest donor en blocs had similar 10-y survival to sequence A SKTs (69% versus 64%, P = 0.3). These findings suggest that future updates of the Kidney Allocation System should include a score specific to pediatric donors to account for these differences in en bloc graft survival.

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse patient and graft survival following adult liver transplantation.

The impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on adult liver transplant recipient outcomes is not clear at a national level. Further understanding of the impact of SDOH on patient outcomes can inform effective equitable healthcare delivery. Unadjusted and multivariable models were used to analyze the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to evaluate the association between the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) based on liver transplant recipient's residential location and patient and graft survival. We included adult recipients between 1/1/2008-12/1/2021. Patient and graft survival were lower in adults living in areas with deprivation scores above the median. Five-year patient and graft survival were 78.7% and 76.5% respectively in the cohort above median SDI compared to 80.5% and 78.3% below median SDI. Compared to the recipients in low deprivation residential areas, recipients residing in highest deprivation (SDI quintile=5) cohort had 6% higher adjusted risk of mortality (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR]=1.06,95%C.I. 1.01-1.13) and 6% higher risk of graft failure (AHR=1.06,95% C.I. 1.001-1.11). The increased risks for recipients residing in more vulnerable residential areas were higher (AHR=1.11,95% CI 1.03-1.20 for both death and graft loss) following the first-year post-transplantation. Importantly, overall risk for graft loss associated with SDI was not linear but instead accelerated above the median level of deprivation. In the United States, SDOH, as reflected by residential distress, significantly impact 5-year patient and graft survival. The overall effect of residential deprivation are modest, but importantly, results illustrate they are more strongly associated with longer-term follow up and accelerate at higher deprivation levels. Further research is needed to evaluate effective interventions and policies to attenuate disparities in outcomes among recipients in highly disadvantaged areas.

Impact of varied immunosuppressive agents and post-transplant diabetes mellitus on prognosis among diverse transplant recipients (experimental studies).

The success of solid organ transplantation (SOT) and the use of immunosuppressive agents offer hope to patients with end-stage diseases. However, the impact of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) on SOT patients has become increasingly evident. In our study, we utilized the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database to investigate the association between PTDM and patient survival in various types of organ transplantations, including liver, kidney, intestinal, heart, lung, and combined heart-lung transplantations (all P <0.001). Our findings revealed a negative effect of PTDM on the survival of these patients. Furthermore, we examined the effects of both generic and innovator immunosuppressive agents on the development of PTDM and the overall survival of different SOT populations. Interestingly, the results were inconsistent, indicating that the impact of these agents may vary depending on the specific type of transplantation and patient population. Overall, our study provides a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the effects of different immunosuppressive agents on prognosis, as well as the impact of PTDM on the survival of patients undergoing various types of SOT. These findings emphasize the need for further research and highlight the importance of optimizing immunosuppressive regimens and managing PTDM in SOT patients to improve their long-term outcomes.

Association of Race and Ethnicity With High Longevity Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Under the US Kidney Allocation System

Rationale & ObjectiveThe US Kidney Allocation System (KAS) prioritizes candidates with ≤20% Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) for high longevity kidneys defined by a ≤20% Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Use of EPTS in the KAS deprioritizes candidates with older age, diabetes, and longer dialysis durations. We assessed whether this use also disadvantages racial-ethnic minority candidates, who are younger but more likely to have diabetes and longer durations of kidney failure requiring dialysis. Study DesignObservational cohort study. Setting& Participants: Adult candidates for and recipients of kidney transplantation represented in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from January 2015 through December 2020. ExposureRace and ethnicity. OutcomesAge-adjusted assignment to ≤20% EPTS, transplantation of a ≤20% KDPI kidney, and post-transplant survival in longevity matched recipients by racial-ethnicity. Analytic ApproachMultivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray competing risks survival analysis, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards methods. ResultsThe cohort included 199,444 candidates (7% Asian, 29% Black, 19% Hispanic/Latino, 43% White) listed for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Non-White candidates had significantly higher rates of diabetes, longer dialysis duration, and were younger than White candidates. Adjusted for age, Asian, Black, and Hispanic/Latino candidates had significantly lower odds of having a ETPS score ≤20% (OR 0.86, [0.81, 0.91], 0.52 [0.50, 0.54], and 0.49, [0.47, 0.51]), and were less likely to receive a ≤20% KDPI kidney (subHR 0.70 [0.66, 0.75], 0.89 [0.87, 0.92], and 0.73 [0.71, 0.76]), compared to White candidates. Among recipients with ≤20% EPTS scores transplanted with a ≤20% KDPI deceased donor kidney, Asian and Hispanic recipients had lower post-transplant mortality (HR 0.45 [0.27, 0.77], and 0.63 [0.47, 0.86]) and Black recipients had higher but not statistically significant post-transplant mortality (HR 1.22 [0.99, 1.52]) compared to White recipients. LimitationsProvider reported race-ethnicity data and 5-year post transplant follow-up period. ConclusionsThe US kidney allocation system is less likely to identify racial-ethnic minority candidates as having a ≤20% EPTS score which triggers allocation of high longevity deceased donor kidneys. These findings should inform the OPTN about how to remedy racial/ethnic disparities introduced through KAS’s current approach of allocating allografts with longer predicted longevity to recipients with longer estimated post-transplant survival.

Public Reporting of Heart Transplant Center Performance: Promoting Clarity or Causing Confusion?

Transplant center report cards are publicly available and used by regulators, insurance payers, and importantly patients and families. In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the variability in reported public performance ratings of pediatric and adult heart transplant centers. Program-specific reports from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 2017-2021 were used to evaluate stability, volatility, and reliability of 3 publicly reported ratings: waitlist survival (WS), getting to a faster transplant (FT), and post-transplantation graft failure (GF). There were 112 adult and 55 pediatric centers. Over the study period, nearly all centers (98%) had at least 1 change in rating in at least 1 of the tiers. The average time to the first rating change of any magnitude was 12-18months for all tiers and centers. For adult centers, the most volatile rating was WS (SD: 0.77), followed by GF (SD: 0.76) and then FT (SD: 0.57). For pediatric centers, the most volatile rating was WS (SD: 0.79), followed by both GF (SD: 0.66) and FT (SD: 0.68), which were equally volatile. All tiers except adult FT had an estimated Fleiss's kappa<0.20, indicating poor agreement/consistency across the study period. In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient for all tiers was<0.50, indicating poor reliability. The current 5-tier reporting of transplant center performance is highly volatile and has poor reliability and consistency. Given the unintended and significant negative consequences these reports can have, critical revision of these ratings is warranted.

(320) - Increased Renal Complications After the 2018 UNOS Policy Change: A Linked Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare Claims

(320) - Increased Renal Complications After the 2018 UNOS Policy Change: A Linked Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare Claims

Wasted Potential: Decoding the Trifecta of Donor Kidney Shortage, Underutilization, and Rising Discard Rates

Kidney transplantation is a life-saving intervention for end-stage renal disease; yet, the persistent gap between organ demand and supply remains a significant challenge. This paper explores the escalating discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States to assess trends, discard reasons, demographical differences, and preservation techniques. Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 2010 to 2021 was analyzed using chi-squared tests for trend significance and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for kidney discard. Over the last decade, discard rates have risen to 25% in 2021. Most discarded kidneys came from extended criteria donor (ECD) donors and elevated kidney donor profile index (KDPI) scores. Kidney biopsy status was a significant factor and predictor of discard. Discard rates varied greatly between Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions. Of reasons for discard, “no recipient located” reached a high of 60%. Additionally, there has been a twofold increase in hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) since 2010, with transportation difficulties being the main reason for the discard of perfused kidneys. Our findings suggest a need to recalibrate organ utilization strategies, optimize the use of lower-quality kidneys through advanced preservation methods, and address the evolving landscape of organ allocation policies to reduce kidney discard rates.

Creating synthetic populations in transplantation: A Bayesian approach enabling simulation without registry re-sampling.

Computer simulation has played a pivotal role in analyzing alternative organ allocation strategies in transplantation. The current approach to producing cohorts of organ donors and candidates for individual-level simulation requires directly re-sampling retrospective data from a transplant registry. This historical data may reflect outmoded policies and practices as well as systemic inequities in candidate listing, limiting contemporary applicability of simulation results. We describe the development of an alternative approach for generating synthetic donors and candidates using hierarchical Bayesian network probability models. We developed two Bayesian networks to model dependencies among 10 donor and 36 candidate characteristics relevant to waitlist survival, donor-candidate matching, and post-transplant survival. We estimated parameters for each model using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data. For 100 donor and 100 candidate synthetic populations generated, proportions for each categorical donor or candidate attribute, respectively, fell within one percentage point of observed values; the interquartile ranges (IQRs) of each continuous variable contained the corresponding SRTR observed median. Comparisons of synthetic to observed stratified distributions demonstrated the ability of the method to capture complex joint variability among multiple characteristics. We also demonstrated how changing two upstream population parameters can exert cascading effects on multiple relevant clinical variables in a synthetic population. Generating synthetic donor and candidate populations in transplant simulation may help overcome critical limitations related to the re-sampling of historical data, allowing developers and decision makers to customize the parameters of these populations to reflect realistic or hypothetical future states.

Calibration of Priority Points for Sensitization Status of Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States.

A primary change to the national organ allocation system in 2014 for deceased donor kidney offers was to weight candidate priority based on sensitization (i.e. calculated panel reactive antibody percentage [CPRA%]) using a sliding scale. Increased priority for sensitized patients could improve equity in access to transplantation for disadvantaged candidates. We sought to evaluate the effect of these weights using a contemporary cohort of adult US kidney transplant candidates. We used the national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to evaluate factors associated with sensitization using multivariable logistic models and rates of deceased donor transplantation using cumulative incidence models accounting for competing risks and multivariable Cox models. We examined 270,912 adult candidates placed on the waiting list between Jan,2016-September,2023. Six-year cumulative incidence of deceased donor transplantation for candidates with cPRA%=[80-85) and [90-95) was 48% and 53% respectively, as compared to 37% for candidates with cPRA%=[0-20). In multivariable models, candidates with high cPRA% had the highest adjusted hazards for deceased donor transplantation. There was significant effect modification such that the association of high cPRA% with adjusted rates of deceased donor transplantation varied by region of the country, gender, race/ethnicity, prior dialysis time and blood type. Results indicate that the weighting algorithm for highly sensitized candidates may overinflate the need for prioritization and lead to higher rates of transplantation. Findings suggest re-calibration of priority weights for allocation is needed to facilitate overall equity in access to transplantation for prospective kidney transplant candidates. However, priority points should also account for subgroups of candidates who are disadvantaged for access to donor offers.

Health Inequity in Likelihood and Time to Renal Recovery after Living Kidney Donation: Implications for Kidney Health in Black Americans.

Live donor kidney transplantation has been popularized to help mitigate the organ shortage crisis. At the time of living donor nephrectomy, living donors lose 50% of their kidney function or glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Studies have shown that in healthy living donors, the remaining kidney is able to adapt and recover 10% to 25% of postdonation lost GFR. GFR recovery is critical to long-term kidney health, particularly for Black Americans who disproportionately suffer from kidney disease with an incidence 2.5 times White Americans. To date, no study has examined whether health inequities in renal recovery postdonation exist. We retrospectively analyzed 100,121 living kidney donors reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1999 and 2021. We estimated GFR (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2021 equation and predicted the likelihood (logistic regression) and time (Cox regression) to recovery of 60% and 75% predonation eGFR. Models adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, and predonation eGFR. Black patients were 47% (adjusted odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.56, p < 0.001) and 43% (adjusted odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.60, p < 0.001) less likely to recover 60% and 75% of predonation eGFR, respectively, compared with their White counterparts. The hazard ratio for time to renal recovery of 60% and 75% of predonation eGFR was 22% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.80, p < 0.001) and 38% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.65, p < 0.001) lower, respectively, than White patients. Black living kidney donors were less likely to recover predonation eGFR, and time to renal recovery was significantly longer than their White counterparts. These data highlight the need for enhanced living kidney donor follow-up, particularly for Black living kidney donors who are at greatest future risk of end-stage kidney disease.

Donor-recipient race-ethnicity concordance and patient survival after liver transplantation

IntroductionWe assessed the association between patient survival after liver transplantation (LT) and donor-recipient race-ethnicity (R/E) concordance. MethodsThe Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) was retrospectively analyzed using data collected between 2002 and 2019. Only adults without history of prior organ transplant and recipients of LT alone were included. The primary outcome was patient survival. Donors and recipients were categorized into five R/E groups: White/Caucasian, African American/Black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and Others. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox Proportional Hazards models, adjusting for donor and recipient covariates. Results85,427 patients were included. Among all the R/E groups, Asian patients had the highest 5-year survival (81.3%; 95% CI = 79.9–82.7), while African American/Black patients had the lowest (71.4%; 95% CI = 70.3–72.6) (P < 0.001). Lower survival rates were observed in recipients who received discordant R/E grafts irrespective of their R/E group. The fully adjusted hazard ratio for death was statistically significant in African American/Black (aHR 1.07–1.18-1.31; P < 0.01) and in White∕Caucasian patients (aHR 1.00-1.04-1.07; P = 0.03) in the presence of donor-recipient R/E discordance. ConclusionDisparities in post-LT outcomes might be influenced by biological factors in addition to well-known social determinants of health.

Characteristics of Delayed Graft Function and Long-Term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Brain-Dead Donors: A Single-Center and Multicenter Registry-Based Retrospective Study.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is common and associated with worse graft outcomes. However, little is known about factors affecting graft survival post-DGF. We studied the association of cold ischemia time (CIT) and Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) with the long-term outcomes of deceased brain-dead donor kidneys with and without DGF. Data from Finland (n = 2,637) and from the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) registry (n = 61,405) was used. The association of KDPI and CIT with the graft survival of kidneys with or without DGF was studied using multivariable models. 849 (32%) kidneys had DGF in the Finnish cohort. DGF and KDPI were independent risk factors for graft loss, [HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.14-1.53), p < 0.001, and HR 1.01 per one point (95% CI 1.01-1.01), p < 0.001, respectively], but CIT was not, [HR 1.00 per CIT hour (95% CI 0.99-1.02), p = 0.84]. The association of DGF remained similar regardless of CIT and KDPI. The US cohort had similar results, but the association of DGF was stronger with higher KDPI. In conclusion, DGF and KDPI, but not CIT, are independently associated with graft survival. The association of DGF with worse graft survival is consistent across different CITs but stronger among marginal donors.

Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Women.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the fastest-growing indication for liver transplantation (LT). Sex disparities among patients with cirrhosis on the LT waitlist are well known. We wanted to understand these disparities further in women with end-stage liver disease patients listed for NASH cirrhosis in a contemporary cohort. We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to assess sex racial, and ethnic differences in NASH patients listed for LT. Adults transplanted from August 1997 to June 2021 were included. Inferential statistics were used to evaluate differences with univariate and multivariate comparisons, including competitive risk analysis. During the study time period, we evaluated 12 844 LT for NASH cirrhosis. Women were transplanted at a lower rate (46.5% versus 53.5%; P < 0.001) and higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (23.8 versus 22.6; P < 0.001) than men. Non-White women were transplanted at a higher MELD (26.1 versus 23.1; P < 0.001) than White women and non-White male patients (26.1 versus 24.8; P < 0.001). Graft and patient survivals were significantly different (P < 0.001) between non-White women and White women and men (White and non-White). Evaluation of LT candidates in the United States demonstrates women with NASH cirrhosis have a higher MELD than men at LT. Additional disparities exist among non-White women with NASH as they have higher MELD and creatinine at LT compared with White women. After LT, non-White women have worse graft and patient survival compared with men or White women. These data indicate that non-White women with NASH are the most vulnerable on the LT waitlist.

Post-transplant survival after normothermic regional perfusion versus direct procurement and perfusion in donation after circulatory determination of death in heart transplantation

BackgroundSince 2019, the annual transplantation rate of hearts donated following circulatory death (DCD) has increased significantly in the United States. The two major heart procurement techniques following circulatory death are direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Post-transplant survival for heart recipients has not been compared between these two techniques. MethodsThis observational study uses data on adult heart transplants from donors after circulatory death from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We identified comparable transplant cases across procurement types using propensity-score matching and measured the association between procurement technique and 1-year post-transplant survival using Kaplan-Meier and mixed-effect Cox proportional hazards models with random intercepts for each center. ResultsAmong 318 DCD heart transplants, 216 (68%) were procured via DPP, and 102 (32%) via NRP. Among 22 transplant centers that accepted circulatory-death donors, 3 used NRP exclusively, and 5 used both procurement techniques. After propensity-score matching on recipient and donor factors, there was no significant difference in one-year post-transplant survival (93.1% for NRP vs 91.1% for DPP, p = 0.79) between procurement techniques. ConclusionsNRP and DPP procurements are associated with similar one-year post-transplant survival. If NRP is ethically permissible and improves outcomes for abdominal organs, it should be the preferred procurement technique for DCD hearts. Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study.

The impact of Karnofsky performance status on prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation

BackgroundFunctional performance as measured by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale has been linked to the outcomes of liver transplant patients; however, the effect of KPS on the outcomes of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) liver transplant population has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the association between pre-transplant KPS score and long-term outcomes in HCC patients listed for liver transplantation.MethodsAdult HCC candidates listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2017 were grouped into group I (KPS 80–100%, n = 8,379), group II (KPS 50–70%, n = 8,091), and group III (KPS 10–40%, n = 1,256) based on percentage KPS score at listing. Survival was compared and multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors.ResultsPatients with low KPS score had a higher risk of removal from the waiting list. The 5-year intent-to-treat survival was 57.7% in group I, 53.2% in group II and 46.7% in group III (P < 0.001). The corresponding overall survival was 77.6%, 73.7% and 66.3% in three groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that KPS was an independent predictor of intent-to-treat survival (P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.19 [95%CI 1.07–1.31] for group II, P = 0.001; HR 1.63 [95%CI 1.34–1.99] for group III, P < 0.001) and overall survival(P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.16 [95%CI 1.05–1.28] for group II, P = 0.004; HR 1.53 [95%CI 1.26–1.87] for group III, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year recurrence rates was higher in group III patients (7.4%), compared with 5.2% in group I and 5.5% in group II (P = 0.037). However, this was not significant in the competing regression analysis.ConclusionsLow pre-transplant KPS score is associated with inferior long-term survival in liver transplant HCC patients, but is not significantly associated with post-transplant tumor recurrence.

Early Graft Failure After Living-Donor Liver Transplant.

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been increasing in the USA. While data exist on longer-term patient and graft outcomes, a contemporary analysis of short-term outcomes is needed. Evaluate short-term (30-day) graft failure rates and identify predictors associated with these outcomes. Adult (≥ 18) LDLT recipients from 01/2004 to 12/2021 were analyzed from the United States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft status at 30 days was assessed with graft failure defined as retransplantation or death. Comparison of continuous and categorical variables was performed and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of early graft failure. During the study period, 4544 LDLTs were performed with a graft failure rate of 3.4% (155) at 30 days. Grafts from male donors (aOR: 0.63, CI 0.44-0.89), right lobe grafts (aOR: 0.40, CI 0.27-0.61), recipients aged > 60years (aOR: 0.52, CI 0.32-0.86), and higher recipient albumin (aOR: 0.73, CI 0.57-0.93) were associated with superior early graft outcomes, whereas Asian recipient race (vs. White; aOR: 3.75, CI 1.98-7.10) and a history of recipient PVT (aOR: 2.7, CI 1.52-4.78) were associated with inferior outcomes. LDLTs performed during the most recent 2016-2021 period (compared to 2004-2009 and 2010-2015) resulted in significantly superior outcomes (aOR: 0.45, p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates that while short-term adult LDLT graft failure is uncommon, there are opportunities for optimizing outcomes by prioritizing right lobe donation, improving candidate nutritional status, and careful pre-transplant risk assessment of candidates with known PVT. Notably, a period effect exists whereby increased LDLT experience in the most recent era correlated with improved outcomes.

DQB1 antigen matching improves rejection-free survival in pediatric heart transplant recipients

IntroductionPresence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), particularly to class II antigens, remains a major challenge in pediatric heart transplantation. Donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is a potential strategy to mitigate poor outcomes associated with DSAs. We evaluated the hypothesis that antigen mismatching at the DQB1 locus is associated with worse rejection-free survival. MethodsData was collected from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for all pediatric heart transplant recipients 2010-2021. Only transplants with complete HLA typing at the DQB1 locus for recipient and donor were included. Primary outcome was rejection-free graft survival through 5 years. ResultsOf 5,115 children, 4,135 had complete DQB1 typing and were included. Of those, 503 (12%) had 0 DQB1 donor-recipient mismatches, 2,203 (53%) had 1, and 1,429 (35%) had 2. Rejection-free survival through 5 years trended higher for children with 0 DQB1 mismatches (68%), compared to those with 1 (62%) or 2 (63%) mismatches (pairwise p=0.08 for both). In multivariable analysis, 0 DQB1 mismatches remained significantly associated with improved rejection-free graft survival compared to 2 mismatches, while 1 DQB1 mismatch was not. Subgroup analysis showed the strongest effect in non-Hispanic Black children and those undergoing retransplant. ConclusionMatching at the DQB1 locus is associated with improved rejection-free survival after pediatric heart transplant, particularly in Black children, and those undergoing retransplant. Assessing high-resolution donor typing at the time of allocation may further corroborate and refine this association. DQB1 matching may improve long-term outcomes in children stabilized either with optimal pharmacotherapy or supported with durable devices able to await ideal donors.