IntroductionThe American Library Association's first consideration of a formalized code of dates to i930, with its suggested code of ethics, and with subsequent statements, revisions, or developments in i939, i975, i979, i98i, and i995. Ethics has continued to play an important role in the library and science field, and significant ethical issues have recently been receiving great attention in light of filtering and CIPA/COPA, as well as privacy, intellectual freedom, and related rights under attack from the USA Patriot Act. We in the professions must remain committed to the ethical principles presented by the ALA's Code, as foundations to our existence.And although the ALA continues to be the major accrediting body for schools of library and science, it does not regulate or standardize the teaching of ethics, nor does it require that accredited schools o∂er coursework in ethics. Some professional organizations, such as the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM), has gone this further step and requires computer science students to take coursework totaling i6 hours, with i0 Social/Professional/Ethical units (Tavani, 2003). In the library and science field, it is assumed that major principles of will be discussed through, for example, management or collection development, but many schools of library and science have developed elective courses which delve more deeply into the myriad of issues facing professionals today. Surveys conducted by Buchanan (2003) reveal that overwhelmingly students in the professions feel that coursework should be required. As the range of ethical issues facing LIS students continues to grow and become ever more complex, such courses may very well come to be required by MLIS programs of study.The introduction and use of the term ethics originates with librarian Robert Hauptman in the late i980s, when Raphael Cappura in Germany also began using the term. Some have defined the domain of as of the ethical issues related to the production, storage, access, and dissemination of information (Weckert and Adeney, i997, p. ix). Much of what we discuss and teach in schools of LIS revolves in and around these four areas-production, storage, access, and dissemination of information. Within all of these realms, the array of ethical issues has grown quite large and complex: There are many issues, many ways of teaching ethics, and much diverse reading in this area. As new professionals leave our schools, they must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to embrace and resolve ethical dilemmas. Just as we teach our students the theory and practice of reference or management, for instance, in preparation for work in the field, we should also teach ethics. Thus, the remainder of this paper surveys courses and their coverage in accredited schools of LIS in the United States and makes recommendations for more consideration of throughout LIS curricula.MethodsA list of all Library and Information Studies schools in the United States2 was obtained from the website of the American Library Association (ALA) in the directory of ALA-accredited Master's programs: Forty-nine ALA-accredited programs were included in the analysis.3, 4The websites of the forty-nine accredited programs were searched to find out whether they o∂ered a graduate-level course. This included searching all posted class schedules and course descriptions. Course schedule/description dates were checked for currency to ensure appropriate representation. Professors teaching the class had to be located, sometimes, by contacting the school or department head; those teaching a graduate level, for-credit class were contacted with a request (sent via e-mail) to provide a course syllabus. In some cases, the syllabi were available on the school web site and it was not necessary to contact the professor. …
Read full abstract