639 Reviews gists who tend to reify boundaries they draw around ancient cultural entities. Cameron argues these boundaries were porous, if they existed at all. Chapter 5 is titled “Captives, Social Boundaries , and Ethnogenesis.” It is concerned with how the presence of captives can create and maintain boundaries between social and ethnic groups and lead to the formation of new ones. Chapter 6 documents what captives contribute to the captor societies: the skills, knowledge, outlook, foodways, beliefs, and ideas they bring and how those contributions affect and alter captor societies. Chapter 7 is a stock taking. Cameron reviews and summarizes previous chapters and addresses the issue inherent in an archaeology alert to the presence of captives: how to find them in the archaeological record. At present, bioarchaeological analyses of human remains, where available, provide the best lines of evidence, for example, gender biases among cemetery populations, differential evidence of violence, and biochemical data documenting people from distant places. In the absence of such evidence, the task becomes more difficult. In some ways, this is the weakest part of the book; on the other hand, her purpose is not to offer a detailed treatise on archaeological methods but to point the field towards being alert to the potential presence of captives. She concludes by tying her discussion of ancient captive taking to modern slave raiding and human trafficking, using the example of the Boko Haram kidnapping of hundreds of school girls in Nigeria as a touch stone. In most chapters, a sophisticated, theoretically informed discussion of the chapter’s topics is grounded in one or more case studies . The prose is limpid and accessible; the thinking equally so. Cameron has thought long and hard about captives and the book’s surficial simplicity combined with intellectual depth reflects that thinking. It is useful for scholars in many fields interested in the topic, for classroom use, and the public. It is a significant contribution to the topic of captives and slaves, which remains urgent as we struggle with our own national legacy of slavery, as well human trafficking across the world and down the street. Kenneth M. Ames Portland State University RIGHTS REMEMBERED: A SALISH GRANDMOTHER SPEAKS ON AMERICAN INDIAN HISTORY AND THE FUTURE by Pauline R. Hillaire edited by Gregory P. Fields University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London, 2016, Illustrations, photographs, maps, notes, bibliography, index. 486 pages. $65.00, cloth. Pauline R. Hillaire’s book Rights Remembered: A Salish Grandmother Speaks on American Indian History and the Future, is an important contribution to scholarly studies in history, anthropology, and Native American studies. Hillaire deftly manages to address Native American history and scholarship from the perspective of a Northwest Coast Native American who has spent her whole life studying the history and context of her tribe, the Lummi Nation. Hillaire’s holistic approach is a tour de force of context as she skillfully manages to weave together scholarly and federal government sources, using her personal experiences and the history of the Lummi tribe as the backdrop of the narrative. Later, Hillaire surprises with chapters on oral histories and poetry. Hillaire is a culture bearer for her people, leading dances, songs, and ceremonies. Hillaire’s book then is a rare product of a tribal culture leader and academic scholar melded in a single volume. Hillaire’s apparent wandering writing style is effective as she provides evidence from personal stories and oral accounts of the Lummi tribe from prehistoric and historic histories. This style is illustrated in her subsection “The Indian Value System” where she compares Native and non-Native perceptions of the 640 OHQ vol. 118, no. 4 world. Hillaire compares her vision of the focus of the United States as that of “money, power, and use of people” with that of Native peoples of a “strong relationship of the person with land, work, exchange” (p. 65). Hillaire illustrates her point by comparing the way Iraq was attacked by the United States as a power grab by jumping to conclusions about their purported contribution to the September 11, 2001, attacks, as opposed to how “Indian Americans” would manage the problem with critical analysis and careful action. Then she follows up with a Lummi...