Context: Trichoscopy is a non-invasive, bedside diagnostic tool used to classify alopecia. It is instrumental in distinguishing between non-cicatricial (non-scarring) and cicatricial (scarring) alopecia, aiding in disease classification, prognosis, and treatment decisions. This modality reduces the need for skin biopsies by identifying specific trichoscopic patterns that correlate with disease activity, severity, and potential for hair regrowth, especially in cicatricial alopecia. It also helps select biopsy sites in diagnostically challenging cases. Objectives: The review discusses trichoscopy of various forms of non-scarring and scarring alopecia. Methods: The authors searched the literature on non-cicatricial and cicatricial alopecia and their clinical and trichoscopic characteristics in various research databases. Results: Non scarring alopecia includes androgenetic alopecia (AGA), female pattern hair loss (FPHL), telogen effluvium, alopecia areata (AA), tinea capitis, trichotillomania (TTM), and tractional alopecia. In AGA and FPHL, trichoscopy identifies hair thickness variability and signs like yellow dots and vellus hair, which aid in assessing disease severity and surgical candidacy for hair transplants. Alopecia areata shows unique trichoscopic features like exclamation mark hairs and yellow dots, which help gauge disease activity. Tinea capitis and TTM also display distinct trichoscopic markers, facilitating accurate diagnosis without invasive biopsies. In scarring alopecias such as discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), lichen planopilaris (LPP), and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), trichoscopy reveals inflammation-related features like Perifollicular hyperkeratosis, erythema, and the absence of follicular ostia, guiding treatment and biopsy decisions. It helps distinguish FFA from conditions like AGA and AA by showing characteristic features like concentric Perifollicular erythema and loss of vellus hair. Morphea and pseudopelade of Brocq each display hallmark trichoscopic features. Morphea, in its early stages, responds well to immunosuppressive treatments, whereas pseudopelade of Brocq, being an end-stage condition, shows limited responsiveness to medical interventions. Conclusions: Overall, this review article emphasizes the importance of trichoscopy as a bedside tool for narrowing differential diagnoses and guiding clinical management in various types of alopecia. It highlights the need for ongoing knowledge of trichoscopic signs to facilitate prompt diagnosis and tailored treatment for both non-scarring and scarring alopecia.
Read full abstract