Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry Research Articles

Hypovitaminosis D and hyperparathyroidism: a 5-year postoperative follow-up of 30,458 gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy patients

BackgroundBariatric procedures are associated with nutrient deficiencies. Studies show an association between gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB]) and hypovitaminosis D as well as hyperparathyroidism, yet few compare RYGB to sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and large long-term analyses are scarce. ObjectiveEvaluate trends of vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in RYGB and SG. SettingNational quality register. MethodThe Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry records all bariatric surgeries in Sweden. Data from 2008 to 2021 on primary RYGB or SG with reported 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH-D) and/or PTH levels were included. Individuals with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded, leaving a study population of 25,385 RYGB and 5073 SG patients. ResultsA decrease in 25-OH-D, mirrored by an increase in PTH, was observed after the first year for both procedures, but more pronounced in RYGB. At 5 years, 25-OH-D levels were still higher than at baseline. Regular supplementation resulted in better 25-OH-D and PTH levels. Linear regression found that procedure type (RYGB versus SG), 25-OH-D levels, and time since surgery were significant factors in predicting PTH levels. The risk of pathologic PTH levels (>7 pmol/L) at 2 and 5 years postoperatively was roughly three times higher in RYGB (odds ratios = 3.41 and 2.84, respectively). ConclusionsPrevious studies alongside these results suggest that RYGB, more so than SG, may cause hypovitaminosis D and thereby hyperparathyroidism, which could lead to osteopenia. The threshold for 25-OH-D should be >75 nmol/L, and despite higher levels, current vitamin D supplementation may not be sufficient. Follow-up should include screening for hyperparathyroidism and hypovitaminosis D.

SF-6D Normative Values Among Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: Results Based on Real-World Evidence from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg)

BackgroundThe SF-6D index can be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years in economic evaluations, which is required by reimbursement agencies and national advisory bodies, including the Swedish ones. However, despite that SF-36 has been largely applied among patients undergoing bariatric surgery, almost no study has accessed the short form six-dimensions (SF-6D) after bariatric surgery.AimTo establish normative values for the SF-6D index among patients undergoing bariatric surgery.Materials and MethodsAll patients who received bariatric surgery in Sweden between 2011–01-01 and 2019–03-31 were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Information includes patients’ sociodemographic characteristics, details regarding the procedure, and postsurgical conditions. The SF-36 is applied at baseline and at follow-up years 1, 2, and 5. The multiple sequential imputation method was applied to handle missingness on SF-6D items. Based on the UK tariff, the SF-6D preference scores were calculated. The normative values for the mean (SD) SF-6D index were reported by timepoint and surgical complications for men and women, respectively. Multivariate analyses were applied to investigate how the SF-6D index is associated with timepoint, controlling for age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities in a stepwise manner.ResultsThe SF-6D index increased at 1 year relative to baseline and was roughly maintained at the same level at 2 years. The normative value of the SF-6D index can be used in economic evaluations for bariatric surgery.Graphical

Mental health from 5 years before to 10 years after bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity: a Swedish nationwide cohort study with matched population controls

The long-term effects of bariatric surgery on the mental health of adolescents with severe obesity remain uncertain. We aimed to describe the prevalence of psychiatric health-care visits and filled prescription psychiatric drugs among adolescents with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery in the 5 years preceding surgery and throughout the first 10 years after surgery, and to draw comparisons with matched adolescents in the general population. Adolescents with severe obesity and who underwent bariatric surgery were identified through the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. We included adolescents who had bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2017 and were younger than 21 years at time of surgery. Each adolescent patient was matched with ten adolescents from the general population by age, sex, and county of residence. Specialist psychiatric care and filled psychiatric prescriptions were retrieved from nationwide data registers. 1554 adolescents (<21 years) with severe obesity underwent bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2017, 1169 (75%) of whom were female. At time of surgery, the mean age was 19·0 years [SD 1·0], and the mean BMI was 43·7 kg/m2 (SD 5·5). 15 540 adolescents from the general population were matched with adolescents in the surgery group. 5 years before the matched index date, 95 (6·2%) of 1535 surgery patients and 370 (2·5%) of 14 643 matched adolescents had a psychiatric health-care visit (prevalence difference 3·7%; 95% CI 2·4-4·9), whereas 127 (9·8%) of 1295 surgery patients and 445 (3·6%) of 12 211 matched adolescents filled a psychiatric drug prescription (prevalence difference 6·2%; 95% CI 4·5-7·8). The year before the matched index date, 208 (13·4%) of 1551 surgery patients and 844 (5·5%) of 15 308 matched adolescents had a psychiatric health-care visit (prevalence difference 7·9%; 95% CI 6·2-9·6), whereas 319 (20·6%) of 1551 surgery patients and 1306 (8·5%) of 15 308 matched adolescents filled a psychiatric drug prescription (prevalence difference 12·0%; 10·0-14·1). The prevalence difference in psychiatric health-care visits peaked 9 years after the matched index date (12·0%; 95% CI 9·0-14·9), when 119 (17·6%) of 675 surgery patients and 377 (5·7%) of 6669 matched adolescents had a psychiatric health-care visit. The prevalence difference in filled psychiatric drug prescription was highest 10 years after the matched index date (20·4%; 15·9-24·9), when 171 (36·5%) of 469 surgery patients and 739 (16·0%) of 4607 matched adolescents filled a psychiatric drug prescription. The year before the matched index date, 19 (1·2%) of 1551 surgery patients and 155 (1·0%) of 15304 matched adolescents had a health-care visit associated with a substance use disorder diagnosis (mean difference 0·2%, 95% CI -0·4 to 0·8). 10 years after the matched index date, the prevalence difference had increased to 4·3% (95% CI 2·3-6·4), when 24 (5·1%) of 467 surgery patients and 37 (0·8%) of 4582 matched adolescents had a health-care visit associated with a substance use disorder diagnosis. Psychiatric diagnoses and psychiatric drug prescriptions were more common among adolescents with severe obesity who would later undergo bariatric surgery than among matched adolescents from the general population. Both groups showed an increase in prevalence in psychiatric diagnoses and psychiatric drug prescriptions leading up to the time of surgery, but the rate of increase in the prevalence was higher among adolescents with severe obesity than among matched adolescents. With the exception of health-care visits for substance use disorders, these prevalence trajectories continued in the 10 years of follow-up. Realistic expectations regarding mental health outcomes should be set preoperatively. Swedish Research Council, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare.

Results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry: A narrative review.

In 2007, the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) was started by the profession to monitor the results of bariatric surgery and to provide a high-quality database for research. In the end of August 2023, SOReg contains 88,379 patients (body mass index [BMI] 41.7 kg/m2 , 41.2 years, 77.1% females, gastric bypass 76.8%). In this narrative review, we demonstrate that preoperative weight loss is of value and that the laparoscopic double omega-loop technique is highly suitable for gastric bypass. Closing the mesenteric openings is, however, important. Swedish bariatric surgery has low mortality, and our results are comparative to those of other countries. Significant long-term improvements are found in common obesity-related diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea. Furthermore, the risk for cardiac failure and major adverse cardiovascular events is significantly reduced. Pregnancy-related outcomes are also improved. Gastric bypass results in significant improvements in quality of life and seems to be cost saving. We have revealed that low socioeconomic status is associated with reduced chance of undergoing bariatric surgery and inferior outcomes. Of note, we have performed several randomized clinical trials within the registry database. In conclusion, high-quality national registry databases, such as SOReg, are important for maintaining high-quality care and present a platform for extensive research.

Very low risk of short bowel after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass – a large nationwide Swedish cohort study

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common bariatric procedures. Internal herniation may lead to small bowel ischemia requiring small bowel resection, resulting in short bowel syndrome. ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of extensive small bowel resection in patients operated with RYGB. We also aimed to look for early clinical warning signs among patients requiring extensive small bowel resection. SettingCohort from national quality registers. MethodsAll patients having undergone RYGB between January 2007 to June 2019 were analyzed in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). We identified patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO) for whom small bowel resection was necessary. Additionally, we assessed clinical signs in these patients. ResultsThe study included 57,255 patients having undergone RYGB. Closure of the mesenteric openings was performed in 78%. Surgery for SBO was required in 3659 (6%) of patients, and small bowel resection in 188 (.3%). Extensive small bowel resection, resulting in less than 1.5 meters of remaining small bowel, was required in 7 patients (.01%). All patients with extensive small bowel resection presented with abdominal pain and had confirmed internal herniation as the cause of the small bowel resection, and 2 of 7 patients died. Closure of mesenteric defects was not associated with a reduction in overall small bowel resection rates (P = .89) ConclusionSurgery for SBO after RYGB was common (6%). The risk of extensive small bowel resection leading to short bowel was low (.01%). Patients with abdominal pain after RYGB should be assessed for internal hernia, as it can be devastating.

The impact of the bougie size and the extent of antral resection on weight-loss and postoperative complications following sleeve gastrectomy: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry

BackgroundThe optimal sleeve diameter and distance from the pylorus to the edge of the resection line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain controversial. ObjectivesTo evaluate the influence of bougie size and antral resection distance from the pylorus on postoperative complications and weight-loss results in LSG. SettingNationwide registry-based study. MethodsThis study included all LSGs performed in Sweden between 2012 and 2019. Data were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Reference bougie size of 35–36 Fr and an antral resection distance of 5 cm from the pylorus were compared to narrower bougie size (30–32 Fr), shorter distances (1–4 cm), and extended distances (6–8 cm) from the pylorus in assessing postoperative complications and weight loss as the outcomes of LSG. ResultsThe study included 9,360 patients with postoperative follow-up rates of 96%, 79%, and 50% at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Narrow bougie and short antral resection distance from the pylorus were significantly associated with increased postoperative weight loss. Bougie size was not associated with increased early or late complications. However, short antral resection distance was associated with high risk of overall early complications [odds ratio: 1.46 (1.17–1.82, P = .001)], although no impact on late complications at 1 and 2 years was observed. ConclusionsUsing a narrow bougie and initiating resection closer to the pylorus were associated with greater maximum weight loss. Although a closer resection to the pylorus was associated with an increased risk of early postoperative complications, no association was observed with the use of narrow bougie for LSG.

Non-response After Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy—the Theoretical Need for Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry

BackgroundRevisional surgery is a second-line treatment option after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GBP) in patients with primary or secondary non-response. The aim was to analyze the theoretical need for revisional surgery after SG and GBP when applying four indication benchmarks.MethodBased on data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, SG and GBP were compared regarding four endpoints: 1. excess weight loss (%EWL) < 50%, 2. weight regain of more than 10 kg after nadir, 3. fulfillment of previous IFSO-guidelines, or 4. ADA criteria for bariatric metabolic surgery 2 years after primary surgery.ResultsA total of 60,426 individuals were included in the study (SG: n = 7856 and GBP: n = 52,570). Compared to patients in the GBP group, more SG patients failed to achieve a %EWL > 50% (23.0% versus 8.5%, p < .001), regained more than 10 kg after nadir (4.3% versus 2.5%, p < .001), and more often fulfilled the IFSO criteria (8.0% versus 4.5%, p < .001) or the ADA criteria (3.3% versus 1.8%, p < 001) at the 2-year follow-up.ConclusionSG is associated with a higher risk for weight non-response compared to GBP. To offer revisional bariatric surgery to all non-responders exceeds the bounds of feasibility and operability. Hence, individual prioritization and intensified evaluation of alternative second-line treatments are necessary.Graphical

Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration versus transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiography during cholecystectomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) poses a particular challenge given the altered anatomy and inability to perform a standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERC). The optimal treatment strategy for intraoperatively encountered CBD stones in post-RYGB patients has not been established. To compare outcomes following laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) and laparoscopy-assisted transgastric ERC for CBDs during cholecystectomy in RYGB-operated patients. Swedish nationwide multi-registry study. The Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCs, GallRiks (n = 215,670), and the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) (n = 60,479) were cross-matched for cholecystectomies with intraoperatively encountered CBD stones in patients with previous RYGB surgery between 2011 and2020. Registry cross-matching found 550 patients. Both LTCBDE (n = 132) and transgastric ERC (n = 145) were comparable in terms of low rates of intraoperative adverse events (1% versus 2%) and postoperative adverse events within 30 days (16% versus 18%). LTCBDE required significantly shorter operating time (P = .005) by on average 31 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) [10.3-52.6], and was more often used for smaller stones <4 mm in size (30% versus 17%, P = .010). However, transgastric ERC was more often used in acute surgery (78% versus 63%, P = .006) and for larger stones >8 mm in size (25% versus 8%, P < .001). LTCBDE and transgastric ERC have similarly low complication rates for clearance of intraoperatively encountered CBD stones in RYGB-operated patients, but LTCBDE is faster while transgastric ERC is more often used in conjunction with larger bile duct stones.

Impact of socioeconomic status on new chronic opioid use after gastric bypass surgery

BackgroundSocioeconomic status may influence weight loss, postoperative complications, and health-related quality of life after bariatric surgery. Chronic use of opioid analgesics is a known risk after bariatric surgery, but whether socioeconomic factors are associated with new chronic use of opioid analgesics has not been investigated in depth. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify socioeconomic factors associated with the development of new chronic use of opioid analgesics after gastric bypass surgery. SettingAll hospitals performing bariatric surgery in Sweden. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data including all primary gastric bypass procedures in Sweden between 2007 and 2015. Data were collected from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, and Statistics Sweden. The primary outcome was new chronic opioid use. ResultsOf the 44,671 participants, 1438 patients became new chronic opioid users. Longer education (secondary education; odds ratio [OR] = .71; 95% CI, .62–.81) or higher education (OR = .45; 95% CI, .38–.53), higher disposable income (20th–50th percentile: OR = .75; 95% CI, .66–.85; 50th–80th percentile: OR = .50; 95% CI, .43–.58; and the highest 80th percentile: OR = .40; 95% CI, .32–.51) were significantly associated with lower risk for new chronic opioid use. Being a second-generation immigrant (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.24–1.90), being on a disability pension or early retirement (OR = 3.04; 95% CI, 2.67–3.45), receiving social benefits (OR = 1.88; 95% CI, 1.59–2.22), being unemployed for <100 days (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08–1.45), being unemployed for >100 days (OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16–1.71), and being divorced or a widow or widower (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17–1.55) were significantly associated with a higher risk for chronic opioid use. ConclusionGiven that long-term opioid use has detrimental effects after bariatric surgery, it is important that information and follow-up are optimized for patients with shorter education, lower income, and disability pension or early retirement because they are at an increased risk of new chronic opioid analgesics use.

Prediction of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) after bariatric surgery using regularized linear regression models: results from a Swedish nationwide quality register

PurposeTo investigate whether the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the patients who underwent bariatric surgery could be predicted using their baseline information.Materials and MethodsAll patients who received bariatric surgery in Sweden between January 1, 2011 and March 31, 2019 were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Baseline information included patients’ sociodemographic characteristics, details regarding the procedure, and postsurgical conditions. QALYs were assessed by the SF-6D at follow-up years 1 and 2. The general and regularized linear regression models were used to predict postoperative QALYs.ResultsAll regression models demonstrated satisfactory and comparable performance in predicting QALYs at follow-up year 1, with R2 and relative root mean squared error (RRMSE) values of about 0.57 and 9.6%, respectively. The performance of the general linear regression model increased with the number of variables; however, the improvement was ignorable when the number of variables was more than 30 and 50 for follow-up years 1 and 2, respectively. Although minor L1 and L2 regularization provided better prediction ability, the improvement was negligible when the number of variables was more than 20. All the models showed poorer performance for predicting QALYs at follow-up year 2.ConclusionsPatient characteristics before bariatric surgery including health related quality of life, age, sex, BMI, postoperative complications within six weeks, and smoking status, may be adequate in predicting their postoperative QALYs after one year. Understanding these factors can help identify individuals who require more personalized and intensive support before, during, and after surgery.Graphical

Outcomes of bariatric surgery for patients with prevalent inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide registry-based cohort study

BackgroundObesity is becoming more prevalent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity, questions remain regarding its safety and effectiveness for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. MethodThis registry-based, propensity-matched cohort study included all patients who had primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in Sweden from January 2007 to June 2020 who had an inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis and matched control patients without an inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. The study included data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, the National Patient Register, the Swedish Prescribed Drugs Register, the Total Population Register, and the Education Register from Statistics Sweden. ResultsIn total, 71,093 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, including 194 with Crohn’s disease and 306 with ulcerative colitis, were 1:5 matched to non–inflammatory bowel disease control patients. The patients with Crohn’s disease had a higher readmission rate within 30 days (10.7% vs 6.1%, odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.02–3.31) than the control patients, with no significant difference between the surgical methods. The patients with ulcerative colitis had a higher risk for serious postoperative complications after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (8.0% vs 3.7%, odds ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.15–6.05) but not after sleeve gastrectomy compared to control patients (0.8% vs 2.3%). No difference was observed in postoperative weight loss or postoperative health-related quality of life. ConclusionSleeve gastrectomy appears to be a safe and effective treatment for obesity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, whereas Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with a higher risk for postoperative complications in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Incidence of Kidney Stones After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery—Data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry

PurposeObesity is associated with increased incidence of kidney stones, a risk further increased by metabolic and bariatric surgery, particularly after procedures with a malabsorptive component. However, there is a paucity in reports on baseline risk factor and on larger population-based cohorts. The objective was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for kidney stones after bariatric surgery by comparing them to an age-, sex-, and geographically matched cohort from the normal population.Material and MethodsPatients operated with primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) from 2007 until 2017 within the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery registry were matched 1:10 to controls from the normal population. Hospital admission or outpatient visits due to kidney stones registered in the National Patient Registry were considered as endpoint.ResultsThe study included 58,366 surgical patients (mean age 41.0±11.1, BMI 42.0±5.68, 76% women) with median follow-up time 5.0 [IQR 2.9–7.0] years and 583,660 controls. All surgical procedures were associated with a significantly increased risk for kidney stones (RYGB, HR 6.16, [95% CI 5.37–7.06]; SG, HR 6.33, [95% CI 3.57–11.25]; BPD/DS, HR 10.16, [95% CI 2.94–35.09]). Higher age, type 2 diabetes hypertension at baseline, and a preoperative history of kidney stones were risk factors for having a postoperative diagnosis of kidney stones.ConclusionPrimary RYGB, SG, and BPD/DS were all associated with a more than sixfold increased risk for postoperative kidney stones. The risk increased with advancing age, two common obesity-related conditions, and among patients with preoperative history of kidney stones.Graphical

Metabolic surgery and oral health: A register-based study.

The impact of weight loss surgery on oral health is not clear. The aim of the present study was to investigate its impact on the risk for dental interventions. All adults who underwent metabolic surgery in Sweden between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 were identified in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg; n=53,643). A control cohort from the general population was created, matched 10:1 on sex, age and place of residence (n=536,430). All individuals were followed in the Swedish Dental Register regarding event rates for four types of dental intervention: restorative, endodontic and periodontal interventions, and tooth extractions. The surgical cohort had increased interventional rates postoperatively regarding all studied outcomes except periodontal interventions. Dental interventions were more common in the surgical cohort both pre- and postoperatively. The difference between the groups increased markedly in the postoperative period. The between-group comparison postoperatively showed increased event rates for restorations (IRR 1.8; 95% CI 1.7-1.8), extractions (1.9; 95% CI 1.9-2.0) and endodontics (2.1; 95% CI 2.0-2.1). The surgical intervention might cause a substantial negative impact on oral health. These results imply an important role for counselling metabolic surgery patients regarding preventive oral health measures.

Total knee arthroplasty and bariatric surgery: change in BMI and risk of revision depending on sequence of surgery

BackgroundPatients with obesity have a higher risk of complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We investigated the change in weight 1 and 2 years post-Bariatric Surgery (BS) in patients that had undergone both TKA and BS as well as the risk of revision after TKA based on if BS was performed before or after the TKA.MethodsPatients who had undergone BS within 2 years before or after TKA were identified from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Register (SOReg) and the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) between 2007 and 2019 and 2009 and 2020, respectively. The cohort was divided into two groups; patients who underwent TKA before BS (TKA-BS) and patients who underwent BS before TKA (BS-TKA). Multilinear regression analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze weight change after BS and the risk of revision after TKA.ResultsOf the 584 patients included in the study, 119 patients underwent TKA before BS and 465 underwent BS before TKA. No association was detected between the sequence of surgery and total weight loss 1 and 2 years post-BS, − 0.1 (95% confidence interval (CI), − 1.7 to 1.5) and − 1.2 (95% CI, − 5.2 to 2.9), or the risk of revision after TKA [hazard ratio 1.54 (95% CI 0.5–4.5)].ConclusionThe sequence of surgery in patients undergoing both BS and TKA does not appear to be associated with weight loss after BS or the risk of revision after TKA.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery in China: A summary of the Greater China Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Database and comparison with other international registry databases.

To summarize the Greater China Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Database (GC-MBD) and to compare patient characteristics and different procedures performed with data from published reports from other international bariatric surgery registries. Data were extracted from the GC-MBD registry in 2021. Baseline demographic characteristics, obesity-related comorbidities and operational information were analysed. Descriptive comparisons of these data were made with the published reports from four other international/national databases, including the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) registry, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database of the United States, the National Bariatric Surgical Registry (NBSR) of the United Kingdom, and the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Fifty-three centres in China registered 6807 cases in the GC-MBD. Compared with published data from the IFSO registry, MBSAQIP, NBSR and SOReg, patients in China undergoing surgery were younger and had a lower body mass index. The incidence of other obesity-related comorbidities, except for gastroesophageal reflux disease, was also higher than in Western countries. Furthermore, more patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy, less revisional bariatric surgery was reported in China, and jejunojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy, uncommon in other countries, was China's second-leading bariatric procedure. By establishing comprehensive national registries such as the GC-MBD, real-world information can be gathered on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Insights into variations in clinical practice can be identified by comparing reports from different countries, which can help in making and evaluating healthcare policies on the best clinical practices at a national level.

The effect of routine division of the greater omentum on small bowel obstruction after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

It remains unknown whether routine division of the greater omentum during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) influences the risk for small bowel obstruction (SBO) after RYGB. To evaluate the effect of omental division on SBO after LRYGB stratified by handling of the mesenteric defects. Nationwide, registry-based. In this registry-based cohort study, 40,517 patients who underwent LRYGB in Sweden within the period from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019, with data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) were included. The study was based on combined data from the SOReg, the National Patient Register, the Swedish Prescribed Drugs Register, and the Total Population Registry. The main outcome was reoperation for SBO. During a follow-up period of 5.9 ± 2.6 years, the cumulative incidence of SBO was 11.2% in the nondivision group compared with 9.7% among patients with divided omentum (hazard ratio [HR] = .83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .77-.89, P < .001). The association was seen in patients without mesenteric defects closure (HR = .69, 95% CI: .61-.78, P < .001) as well as patients with closed mesenteric defects (HR = .80, 95% CI: .74-.87, P < .001). Division of the greater omentum is associated with reduced risk for SBO after antecolic, antegastric LRYGB and should be considered as a complement to mesenteric defects closure to further reduce the risk for SBO after LRYGB.

Association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.

The risks and benefits of metabolic and bariatric surgery for patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remain to be investigated. The aim of this study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery in patients with previous ADHD compared with matched control individuals. Registry based. This 2-staged matched-cohort study included all adults with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy from 2007 until 2017 registered in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Patients with prescribed medication for ADHD were matched with control individuals without ADHD with a follow-up of up to 11 years after surgery. Among 1431 patients with ADHD and 2862 control individuals (mean body mass index, 42 kg/m2; mean age, 35 years), no difference in weight loss or follow-up attendance over 2 years was seen. ADHD was associated with a higher risk for early postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.63), self-harm (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.75), and substance abuse (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.55), while associations with overall mortality (HR = 1.42; 95% CI, .99-2.03), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (HR = 1.93; 95% CI, .98-3.83), and effects on obesity-related diseases were uncertain. ADHD was associated with a lower health-related quality of life in all aspects before surgery. These differences increased for mental and obesity-related aspects but remained unchanged over time for physical aspects. Compared with patients without ADHD, patients treated pharmacologically for ADHD experience similar weight loss and remission of obesity-related diseases without an increased risk for serious complications but report a lower health-related quality of life and havean increased risk of substance abuse and self-harm. This further emphasizes the need for closefollow-up care for this group of individuals.

Opioid Use After Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy or Intensive Lifestyle Intervention.

To compare opioid use in patients with obesity treated with bariatric surgery versus adults with obesity who underwent intensive lifestyle modification. Previous studies of opioid use after bariatric surgery have been limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up, and lack of control groups. Nationwide matched cohort study including individuals from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry and the Itrim health database with individuals undergoing structured intensive lifestyle modification, between August 1, 2007 and September 30, 2015. Participants were matched on Body Mass Index, age, sex, education, previous opioid use, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric status (n = 30,359:21,356). Dispensed opioids were retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register from 2 years before to up to 8 years after intervention. During the 2-year period before treatment, prevalence of individuals receiving ≥1 opioid prescription was identical in the surgery and lifestyle group. At 3 years, the prevalence of opioid prescriptions was 14.7% versus 8.9% in the surgery and lifestyle groups (mean difference 5.9%, 95% confidence interval 5.3-6.4) and at 8 years 16.9% versus 9.0% (7.9%, 6.8-9.0). The difference in mean daily dose also increased over time and was 3.55 mg in the surgery group versus 1.17 mg in the lifestyle group at 8 years (mean difference [adjusted for baseline dose] 2.30 mg, 95% confidence interval 1.61-2.98). Bariatric surgery was associated with a higher proportion of opioid users and larger total opioid dose, compared to actively treated obese individuals. These trends were especially evident in patients who received additional surgery during follow-up.

Major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with type-2 diabetes, a nationwide cohort study comparing primary metabolic and bariatric surgery to GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment

BackgroundGlucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) both improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with severe obesity and type-2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of MBS on major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) in patients with severe obesity and T2D compared to patients with T2D treated with GLP-1 RA.Subjects and methodsIn this propensity score matched cohort study on nationwide data, patients with T2D and severe obesity who underwent MBS in Sweden from 2007 until 2019 were identified from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry and matched to a non-surgical group with T2D treated with GLP-1 RA (81.7% liraglutide, 9.0% dulaglutide, 6.0% exenatide, 1.6% lixisenatide and 0.8% semaglutide) from the general population using generalized linear model. Major outcome was MACE (hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome or cerebrovascular event or all-cause death), evaluated with multivariable Cox regression.ResultsIn total 2161 patients (obesity class I (10.2%), class II (40.3%), class III (49.5%)) were matched to 2161 non-surgical patients (mean age 51.1 ± 9.29 vs 51.5 ± 8.92 years, 64.8% vs. 64.4% women, with mean number of diabetes drugs of 2.5 ± 0.89 vs 2.6 ± 0.87, a mean duration of diabetes of 6.0 ± 4.15 vs 6.0 ± 4.51 years with 44.2% vs. 42.8% being treated with insulin at baseline). During the study period, 113 patients (8-year cumulative incidence 9.3%) compared to 130 non-surgical patients (8-year cumulative incidence 11.3%) suffered from MACE or all-cause mortality (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.59–0.98), and 69 patients (8-year cumulative incidence 5.1%) compared to 92 non-surgical patients (8-year cumulative incidence 7.6%) suffered from a non-fatal MACE (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.49–0.93).ConclusionIn this matched cohort study, MBS was associated with lower risk for MACE compared to treatment with early GLP-1 RA in patients with T2D.

Effect of age on quality of life after gastric bypass: data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry.

Whether patients aged 60 years or older should be recommended bariatric surgery is still controversial. To assess the effect of age on health-related quality of life (QoL) over time after gastric bypass. Data from the Swedish national registry for bariatric surgery. Data of 57,215 patients undergoing gastric bypass were retrieved from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Register with a follow-up rate at 1,2, and 5 years at 89%, 69%, and 59%, respectively. Patients were divided into 5-years age intervals. Odds ratios for the relative mean changes in QoL were compared by logistic regression. Preoperatively, patients aged 60 years or older scored better on mental aspects (Mental Component Summary score, MCS) of RAND-36 (Short Form Health Survey (higher values better)) as well as OP (Obesity related Problem scale (lower values better)) better than the entire cohort of patients (MCS: mean [95% CI], 46.2 [45.5-46.9] versus 43.5 [43.4-43.7], respectively; OP: mean [95% CI], 55.3 [54.0-56.6] versus 64.1 [63.9-64.4], respectively), whereas the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores of patients aged 60 years or older were lower (mean [95% CI], 32.3 [31.7-32.8] for the ≥60-yr cohort versus 36.4 [36.2-36.5] for the entire cohort; P < .001 for all). In all age groups, MCS was improved at 1 and 2 years but decreased to baseline at 5 years. The postoperative improvements in PCS and OP were sustained in all age groups. Although the relative increases for PCS and OP in patients aged ≥60 years were somewhat lower compared with the entire cohort at 5 years, the values were well above baseline levels (mean [95% CI], 41.0 [40.0-42.0] versus 32.3 [31.7-32.8] and 22.2 [20.3-24.0] versus 55.3 [54.0-56.6], respectively; P < .001). Mental QoL is transiently improved after bariatric surgery without marked differences between age groups. However, patients aged ≥60 years report pronounced and sustained improvements in physical and obesity-specific QoL 5 years postoperatively. These observations support previous studies that older patients should not be denied bariatric surgery from a risk-benefit perspective, solely based on age.