Scale To Assess Unawareness Of Mental Disorder Research Articles

Relationship of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to mechanical restraint used in a psychiatric hospital in Spain.

Coercive measures have been applied in mental health fields throughout history, denying people with mental illness the ability to decide, even though there is increasing evidence that these measures bring few benefits to these individuals. The objective of this study was to analyse the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics most likely associated with the use of mechanical restraints (MRs) in psychiatric hospital settings. This was a descriptive, comparative and analytical cross-sectional study in people with mental disorders who were hospitalized in two hospitals in the Autonomous Valencian Community (Spain). We included a total of 91 participants who completed the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Barrat's Impulsiveness Scale and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. The results we collected indicated that the patients most likely to be mechanically restrained were younger people with less awareness of their symptoms and disease, previous admissions to a psychiatric hospital and cohabitation with parents and/or family. In addition, having been admitted involuntarily, previously having had MRs applied, presenting more positive psychotic symptoms and habitual caffeine consumption all predicted the use of MRs. The variables that were able to predict MR were involuntary admission, previous use of MR, the presence of positive psychotic symptoms and caffeine consumption. Evaluation of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients can help health professionals, especially nurses, to recognize patients who are at risk of requiring MR. This allows mental health practitioners to take these factors into account during interventions or when implementing programmes designed to reduce the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospital settings. What problem did the study address? Coercive measures have been applied in mental health fields throughout history, with no benefits to these patients. What were the main findings? There are studies that relate some variables to MR in psychiatric settings, but we have been able to find variables capable of predicting MR such as involuntary admission, previous use of MR, the presence of positive psychotic symptoms and caffeine consumption. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings of this study allow for the reduction of MRs in psychiatric units. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics found to be related to MR will help professionals identify when a patient is admitted in order to use specific interventions aimed at preventing the use of MRs during admission. This is the first study to indicate a relationship between caffeine consumption and the use of MRs. Further studies will be necessary to verify if controlled caffeine supplementation during admission to psychiatric units could become an additional strategy contributing to preventing the application of MR specifically in individuals who habitually consume coffee or caffeine-containing beverages daily. We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines using the STROBE reporting method. No patient or public contribution.

The Insight of Patients and Their Parents Differ in the Early Phase of Psychosis

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate whether the insight of patients and their parents differ in the early phase of psychosis. Target population were the patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of the psychotic spectrum (F20- F29; ICD- 10th; disease duration ≤ 5 years), both sexes, with average age M = 25.4 (SD = 3.56, C = 25, min = 18, max = 32) and their parents. Insight into illness in patients was assessed using the Scale to assess Unawareness of mental Disorder (SUMD) abbreviated version. Parents’ insight into illness was assessed with a modified version of the SUMD with question rephrased to probe parents’ understanding of patients’ illness. The expression, structure and severity of psychotic symptoms was assessed by The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia (PANSS- Five factor models) and Clinical global impression scale (CGI- s). The results indicated a statistically significant (Z = 2.99; p < 0.01) higher mean value on General Awareness of patients (M = 6.1, SD = 3.26) compared to parents (M = 5.0, SD = 2.99. A significant difference was obtained by the sex of parents too (z = -2.07, p < 0.05): fathers had better insight (M = 2.0, SD = 1.15) than mothers (M = 1.5, SD = 0.89). The results call for necessity to develop innovative and comprehensive program for early family interventions.

Effects of bilateral, bipolar-nonbalanced, frontal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on negative symptoms and neurocognition in a sample of patients living with schizophrenia: Results of a randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial

Negative symptoms (NS), conceived as Avolition-Apathy (AA) and Expressive Deficit (EXP) domains, and neurocognitive impairments represent unmet therapeutic needs for patients with schizophrenia. The present study investigated if bilateral bipolar-nonbalanced frontal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) could improve these psychopathological dimensions.This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study (active-tDCS versus sham-tDCS, both, n = 25) included 50 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia clinically stabilized. Patients received 20-min 2 mA active-tDCS or sham-tDCS (anode: left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex; cathode: right orbitofrontal region). Primary outcomes included: PANSS-Negative subscale, Negative Factor (Neg-PANSS), AA and EXP domains; neurocognitive performance at Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Secondary outcomes included: PANSS subscales and total score, Disorganized/Concrete (DiscC-PANSS) and Positive Factors, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores, clinical insight at Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed evaluating between-group changes over time.Significant improvements following active-tDCS were observed for all NS measures (all, p < 0.001; d > 0.8) and for working memory (p = 0.025, d = 0.31). Greater variations following to active treatment emerged also for PANSS-General Psychopathology subscale (p < 0.001; d = 0.54), PANSS total score (p < 0.001; d = 0.69), CGI indexes (all, p < 0.001; d > 0.6), DiscC-PANSS (p < 0.001; d = 0.80) and SUMD-general Unawareness index (p = 0.005; d = 0.15) but not for positive symptoms and others insight measures. Good safety/tolerability profiles were found.Bilateral bipolar-nonbalanced frontal-tDCS is a non-pharmacological approach in schizophrenia effectively improving NS, particularly the AA and EXP domains, probably acting by modulating dysfunctional cortical-subcortical networks. Preliminary results also suggest working memory improvements following tDCS. Further studies are needed to confirm the neurobiological basis of these results.

Is clinical insight a determinant factor of subjective recovery in persons living with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders?

Good clinical insight is predictive of clinical recovery in schizophrenia (i.e. symptomatic remission and functional improvement). However, the recent subjective recovery paradigm (i.e. the self-identity reconstruction process with and beyond psychosis) questioned the relevance of seeking patients’ awareness of their medically-defined illness. This study aimed to assess the relationship between clinical insight and subjective recovery in individuals with psychotic disorders. Sixty-seven outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were assessed for clinical insight using the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) and for self-rated subjective recovery using the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). Among all dimensions of insight, only the unawareness of current symptoms was significantly associated with RAS total score, with illness duration as the only moderating factor. On the final regression model, unawareness of current symptoms was confirmed as the strongest of six factors explaining all together 44% of the subjective recovery variance, whereas clinical insight taken as an independent multidimensional construct did not significantly participate in explaining subjective recovery. Our study highlights the weak and only partial implication of clinical insight in subjective recovery, and invites clinicians to consider the patients’ meaning making process of morbid experiences in order to build a self-directed and medically-supported recovery.

Video self-confrontation as a therapeutic tool in schizophrenia: A randomized parallel-arm single-blind trial

BackgroundLack of insight is a barrier to treating psychosis. Preliminary studies have suggested that showing people videos of their psychotic behaviour may improve personal insight. This clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of video self-confrontation. MethodsInpatients between 18 and 65 years old with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were filmed upon admission to two psychiatric hospitals while experiencing acute psychosis. After stabilization, individuals were randomized 1:1 to the “self-video” group where they watched their own video or to the “no video” control group. The primary outcome was the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) at 48 h by a blinded assessor. Secondary objectives included psychotic and depressive symptoms, medication adherence and functioning using the Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia. Patients were followed up for four months. Results60 participants were randomized and the level of insight did not differ between groups at 48 h (p = 0.98). There was no impact on SUMD subscores or the other insight questionnaires at any timepoint, nor on psychopathology or medication adherence. At one month, the level of functioning of those in the “self-video” group (n = 23) was higher (61.8 vs 53.5, p = 0.02), especially concerning “Treatment” and “Daily life”. No adverse effects were reported. After video self-confrontation, people expressed more positive than negative emotions and were less lost to follow-up. ConclusionVideo self-confrontation did not change levels of insight, but may have a therapeutic impact nonetheless, by improving levels of self-care and adherence to care, indicating that this innovative therapeutic tool requires further study.Trial Registration Number: NCT02664129

Comparison of three scales (BIS, SUMD and BCIS) for measuring insight dimensions and their evolution after one-year of follow-up: Findings from the FACE-SZ Cohort

The aim of our study was to compare the performance of three different instruments measuring clinical and cognitive dimensions of insight.Data on 182 outpatients with schizophrenia and one-year follow-up assessments was drawn from the FACE-SZ cohort. Awareness of clinical state (« clinical insight ») was measured using both a clinician-rated measure (the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD)), and a self-report measure (the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS). Cognitive insight was measured using a self-report measure (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)). For each scale, change in insight was examined at the follow-up.Correlations between SUMD and BIS subscales measuring same dimensions were significant. BIS-BCIS correlations were weak for all combinations except between BIS illness dimension and BCIS composite score. At the follow-up, BIS and SUMD awareness of treatment need improved whereas illness and symptom awareness increased only on the SUMD. Conversely, cognitive insight composite scores decreased.Despite relatively good overall agreement between the two clinical insight instruments, considerable variability for similar insight dimensions measured by different instruments was found. Agreement between cognitive and clinical insight is moderate. Our study strengthens the argument that insight is harder to operationalize than other symptoms and may explain why it is so seldom explicitly targeted in schizophrenia treatment.

A comparative study evaluating insight in different phase of illness among patients with bipolar disorder by using multiple scales

Aim This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate insight and its correlates among patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Methodology 180 patients with BD were evaluated on Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorders (SUMD), Insight scale for affective disorders (ISAD), Mood Disorders Insight Scale (MDIS), and Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). Results About half of the patients were in clinical remission (N = 94; 52.2%), one-fifth (N = 37; 20.55%) were in the phase of mania and one-fourth (N = 49; 27.2%) were in a depression. There was no significant difference in the level of insight between those in clinical remission and those in depression except for one of the domains of BCIS. Patients with mania had poorer insight compared to those in remission and depression. In terms of association of insight as assessed by different scales, in the whole sample and all the three subgroups, SUMD current and past scores had a significant positive correlation with the ISAD total score. In the whole sample, among patients currently in remission and those currently in depression, ISAD total score had significant negative correlation with MDIS total score. Poorer insight as assessed on SUMD (current and past), ISAD and MDIS was associated with poorer medication adherence. Conclusion The present study demonstrates that patients with mania have poor insight when compared to the patients in clinical remission and depression. The present study also demonstrates that the assessment of clinical insight is not affected much by the type of scale used.

Effectiveness of clozapine on quality of life and functioning in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Background Although it is well known that treatment with clozapine is associated with improvement in core symptoms of schizophrenia, little information is available about its impact on other outcome variables. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the short term (3 months) effectiveness of clozapine in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in terms of quality of life, disability, and level of functioning. Methods This naturalistic follow-up study evaluated 52 participants at the baseline and three months (±1 week) after initiation of clozapine (prospective assessment) on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for schizophrenia, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Checklist and Scale, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorders (SUMD), Social Occupational Functioning Scale – SOFS, Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST), Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS), World Health Organisation Quality Of Life–BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and Self-report Quality of Life Measure for people with schizophrenia. Results Treatment with clozapine led to significant improvement in the quality of life, functioning, and disability; reduction in psychopathology (positive, negative, general psychology, depression), the severity of illness, compulsive behavior, and improvement in insight including cognitive insight. Conclusions Treatment with clozapine leads to improvement in core symptoms of schizophrenia and is also associated with significant improvement in the quality of life, functioning, and disability.

Well-informed but not aware: The P.A.C.T.® psychoeducation program for schizophrenia improves knowledge about, but not insight into, the illness.

Most individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) have little to no insight regarding the presence of their illness. Psychoeducational programs are state-of-the-art interventions that consist in delivering stabilized patients with accurate knowledge about their illness and its treatment. Evidence suggests a significant relationship between levels of illness-related knowledge and insight in SZ patients. However, the effect of psychoeducation on these related outcomes needs to be explored further. In this open label study involving 30 French-speaking patients with SZ, we propose to compare levels of knowledge and insight before and after the French P.A.C.T.® psychoeducation program to investigate how this approach affects both outcomes. Knowledge levels were measured with the self-questionnaire "What do I know?". Insight levels were measured using the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD). Symptoms were assessed with the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). A large significant improvement of knowledge was observed (p < 0.001; d = 0.77). By contrast, the analysis reported no significant effect of psychoeducation on insight (p = 0.86; d = 0.07). PANSS total scores were significantly decreased after treatment (p = 0.001; d = 0.66). Although the P.A.C.T.® program is a promising tool for improving illness-related knowledge in SZ patients, its use is not sufficient to significantly improve insight levels.

Stress coercitif en unité de soins intensifs psychiatrique : quel lien avec l’insight ?

The aim of this work was to study the correlations between the coercive experience level in patients in a psychiatric intensive care unit and clinical insight. We included 40 patients without specific diagnosis criteria at the end of their hospitalization in the intensive care unit. We assessed patients with the Coercion Experience Scale (CES) to measure their coercive stress level, and the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) which measures clinical insight. A total of 42.5 % of our sample suffered from mood disorders, 50 % suffered from psychotic disorders and 7.5 % from other disorders. On the one hand, we found that patients’ coercive stress level was neither correlated with the awareness of their mental disorder nor with the awareness of social consequences of their mental disorder. On the other hand, we found that coercive stress level was significantly correlated with patients’ awareness of treatment efficacy and that the specific CES factor measuring coercion showed a strong trend to significantly correlate with patients’ awareness of treatment efficacy. These results seem to show that education about benefits of treatment is a key point to improve patients’ coercive stress in a psychiatric intensive care unit, more than an education about awareness of the mental disorder itself.

Relationship between childhood trauma and level of insight in schizophrenia: A path-analysis in the national FACE-SZ dataset

IntroductionThis study aimed was to investigate the relationship between different types of childhood trauma and the level of insight (i.e., awareness of having a psychiatric disorder) in subjects suffering from schizophrenia, as well as the putative role of clinical mediators. Methods294 community-dwelling subjects with stable schizophrenia were included into FACE-SZ, a multicentre cross-sectional study. All patients were assessed by specialized multidisciplinary teams. The level of insight was assessed by the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), and childhood trauma by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).Path analyses from the five CTQ subscales (physical abuse and neglect, emotional abuse and neglect, and sexual abuse) and the SUMD, with current symptomatology (i.e., positive, negative, global psychopathology and depression) as mediator, was performed. ResultsPhysical neglect (β = 0.14) and abuse (β = 0.13) were significantly associated with poor insight. Negative symptoms were a clinical mediator of the relationship between physical neglect and poor insight. Moreover, positive (β = 0.21) and negative (β = 0.30) symptoms were associated with poor insight, whereas depression (β = −0.14) was associated with higher levels of insight. DiscussionFor the first time, this study shows a significant relationship between childhood trauma, specifically physical neglect and abuse, and poor insight. The level of insight was linked to different clinical dimensions. Among subjects with schizophrenia, these results provide support for a role of childhood trauma in poorer management outcomes, and the need to provide treatment, including psycho-education that better targets the consequences of childhood trauma.

A multi-dimensional approach to the relationship between insight and aggressiveness in schizophrenia: Findings from the FACE-SZ cohort

BackgroundAggressiveness is a stigma frequently associated with schizophrenia. The role of insight as a risk factor of aggressiveness remains contradictory; mainly because single measures of these states mask their complexity and heterogeneity. MethodsThis study was conducted on 666 patients aged 15 and above with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder, drawn from the French national network of schizophrenia expert center database. Collected data comprised socio-demographics and standardized psychiatric assessments. Aggressiveness was evaluated using the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and insight using the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) and Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS). ResultsHostility was the aggressiveness dimension the most strongly associated with SUMD insight dimensions. Patients aware of their illness were nearly twice as likely to show hostility than those seriously unaware (OR = 1.95, 95% CI.: 1.08–3.5), but not when further adjusting for depression. Similarly, those aware of the consequences of their illness and of their symptoms were more hostile. Patients moderately aware of illness consequences had a higher risk of both anger and physical aggressiveness than those unaware (OR = 2.63, 95% CI.: 1.42–4.86, OR = 2.47, 95% CI.: 1.33–4.60, respectively), even when adjusting for depression for anger. ConclusionOur study confirms that a multi-dimensional approach to insight and aggressiveness is essential to understand the types of links between these clinical states. Insight may trigger the expression of an underlying hostile tendency, maybe via depression and self-stigmatisation. This should be taken into account in therapeutic approaches to improve insight.

F115. INSIGHT AND MANIC SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIA IN THE KOREAN COMMUNITY

BackgroundMany studies have highlighted the similarity of the symptoms between bipolar disorders and schizophrenia. Moreover, there are no pathognomonic symptoms that can differentiate these two disorders, and 9% of schizophrenia patients have experienced a manic syndrome in their lifetime. Insight about their symptoms and illness is very important factor for the differential diagnosis and the management in schizophrenia. To examine the relationship among the insight, the psychotic and manic symptoms, and clinical variables in patients with chronic schizophrenia.MethodsSeventy-four participants (male 44, female 30) with chronic schizophrenia in community mental health facilities have been evaluated with the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).ResultsThe mean number of previous admission was 3.85. Their drug adherence was favorable (6.73 day/week). Mean CGI-S score was 3.8. Thirty-five percent of subject were MDQ positive (cutoff point = 7 or more). Among SUMD, “awareness of effect of medication” showed significant negative correlation (r = -0.33) with total MDQ score not with total BPRS score. The negative correlation was more obvious in participants with negative MDQ (total MDQ score 6 or less, r = -0.31). Several MDQ items (irritability, r = -0.25; decreased sleep, r = -0.27; thought racing, r = -0.28; and easy distractibility, r = -0.40) negatively correlated with “awareness of effect of medication”. In contrast, only one item (guilt feeling, r = -0.27) of BPRS revealed this correlation. Individual items in MDQ and BPRS rarely correlated with each other. Total MDQ score was not correlated with duration of illness and medication adherence.DiscussionManic symptoms were frequently detected even in schizophrenia as reported in previous studies. This made it difficult to differentially diagnose the disorder using only the total MDQ score. There was possible relationship between these manic symptoms and their insight. Identifying manic symptoms in schizophrenia would be considerable in clinical setting.

F221. SELECTIVE ATTENTION BIAS FOR FEAR STIMULI AND HALLUCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown the association between affective dysregulation and severity of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic patients. Attentional biases, which operate automatically to favor the processing of emotionally negative information in early stages of information processing, are known to play a causal role in the etiology of anxiety and other negative affective states. This study was conducted to evaluate the association between selective attention bias for fear stimuli and psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.MethodsA total of 66 patients with schizophrenia were included in the study. Attentional biases were measured with the dot-probe task with facial expression of neutral and fear emotional. To measure the psychotic features of the participants, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS), the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), and Clinical Global Impression–Severity scale (CGI-S) were used.ResultsAttentional vigilance scores were calculated by subtracting the median RT in congruent trials (dot at the position of the fear face) from the median RT in incongruent trials (dot at the position of the neutral face) Attentional vigilance scores was moderately correlated with the hallucination subscale of PSYTATS (r=0.268, p=0.029) in the participants. No correlation was found between selective attention bias and the scores of PANSS, PSYTATS-delusion, SUMD, and CGI-S. When the participants were divided into biased and non-biased groups by the attentional vigilance scores of +40 msec, no significant difference was found in the clinical measures. However, a statistical trend was found in hallucination severities between the biased and non-biased groups (p=0.092).DiscussionAs a pilot study, the results suggest that the emotional information processing might affect the subjective severity of psychotic features in schizophrenia. Further study would be needed to clarify this association.

Restraint or not restraint. Involuntary transport from home of schizophrenic patients

IntroductionAlthough physical restraint (PR) is a non-rarely practice on psychiatry there are few studies that focus the attention on the risk factors for this intervention. PR is a legitimacy practice when is needed and well applied but is not free from side effects. Knowing risk factors might be useful to improve the application of PR.ObjectivesStudy the risk factors involved with the use of PR at patient's home in individuals with schizophrenia before the involuntary transport (IT) to a psychiatric facility.MethodsIs a descriptive and observational study of 267 psychotic patients that were assisted by a psychiatric home care unit (EMSE) in Barcelona during their IT. The sample was divided in two groups, depending on the need of PR. Socio-demographic data were collected as well as positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), WHO disability assessment schedule (WHO/DAS), global assessment of functioning scale (GAF), Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD). Aggressiveness was assessed by PANSS-EC consisting of 5 items: excitement, tension, hostility, uncooperativeness and poor impulse.ResultsFrom the 267 psychotic patients 109 required PR. 154 were male and the average of age was 47. The results were significant in the PR group versus no PR for PANSS-EC (P = 0.000), as well as WHO/DAS (P = 0.017), GAF (P = 0.042), Positive PANSS (P = 0.000), age (P = 0.001) and substance use (P = 0.012). Were no significant for gender, insight or Negative PANSS.ConclusionsAggressiveness and violence were the most important PR related factors followed by positive symptoms, age, substance use and global functioning.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

P.3.f.001 - Functionality and insight in chronic psychosis

Patients with schizophrenia have been found to show unawareness of cognitive impairment. However, its frequency and its relationship to lack of insight into illness are uncertain.Forty-two patients with chronic schizophrenia were given tests of executive function and memory. Awareness of cognitive impairment was measured by means of discrepancy scores — differences between patient and psychologist ratings of memory and frontal/executive failures in daily life. Insight into illness was assessed using the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD).A majority of the patients were found to underestimate their cognitive impairment; however, some overestimated it. Unawareness of cognitive impairment and lack of clinical insight loaded on different factors in a factor analysis, but these two factors were themselves correlated.The findings suggest that both unawareness and overestimation of cognitive impairment characterise patients with schizophrenia, although the former is more common. Awareness of cognitive impairment occurs independently of insight into illness at the clinical level, although the two phenomena may be linked at a deeper level.

Study of factors affecting drug compliance in schizophrenia- cross sectional survey

Introduction: Schizophrenia is a condition characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized behavior, disorganized thought, and negative symptoms. There is overwhelming evidence that antipsychotics can be effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia. Approximately 75% of individuals relapse without drugs compared to 25% with drug. Patients who receive long-acting depot have lower relapse rates than patients who receive oral medications. The factors affecting drug compliance include side effects, psychopathology, social support, and insight. Indian studies are comparatively few in this area; knowledge of these factors can help in formulating strategies for enhancing drug compliance and outcome. Methods: This study was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry T D Medical College, Alleppey, a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients who attended the Outpatient department were assessed with following instruments, Positive and negative symptom scale, Udvalg Klinske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale, Multidimensional scale of perceived social support, Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), Compliance was assessed by using the criteria of fully compliant defined as those miss less than 20% of medication, partially compliant those who misses 20% to 80% of medication and noncompliant those who miss more than 80% of medicines. Data was analysed using Chi square test and regression analysis. Result: Sex, Education status, marital status, Occupation, and drugs administered had significant relationships with Compliance. Conclusion:, it is advisable to use minimum number of drugs for ensuring compliance.

Insight, self-stigma and depressive symptoms among patients with schizophrenia

Depressive symptoms are rather prevalent among patients with schizophrenia and various factors can influence them. Insight and self-stigma shows complex and contradictory relationship, both are among most important features of schizophrenia with strong impact on depressive symptoms. We wanted to test hypothesis that preserved insight is related to depressive symptoms only when self-stigma is also high. Our cross-sectional research comprised 149 patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia, both gender, age span 25-45 years. Rating scales used were Calgary Depression Scale (CDS), Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) and Internalized Stigma in Mental Illness (ISMI) which are specifically designed for patients with schizophrenia. Majority of patients were male (72%), single or separated (85%). Relation between selfstigma and depressive symptoms was statistically significant ( b =0.12, 95% CI=[0.06, 0.19], β=0.32, t (135)=3.89, P b =–0.01, 95% CI=[–0.02,–0.001], β=–0.17, t (135)=–2.20, P =0.029). Post-hoc analysis showed that among patients with extremely high selfstigma (more than 90 centile), higher insight was related to more depressive symptoms (b=–0.22, 95% CI=[–0.42,–0.02], β=–0.34, t =–2.23, P =0.028). These results are important for tailoring specific antistigma programs for patients with high level of insight in order to prevent deleterious impact of depressive symptoms on course of schizophrenia.

The relationship between cognitive insight and quality of life in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Symptom severity as potential moderator

Cognitive insight is implicated in the formation and maintenance of hallucinations and delusions. However, it is not yet known whether cognitive insight relates to broader outcome measures like quality of life. In the current study, we investigated whether the component elements of cognitive insight—self-certainty and self-reflectiveness—were related to quality of life for 43 outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Cognitive insight was assessed using the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) while quality of life was assessed with Quality of Life Scale (QLS). We tested whether this relationship was moderated by clinical insight and symptom severity using the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that self- reflectiveness had an unmoderated positive relationship with quality of life. Self-certainty was associated with better quality of life for people with more severe symptoms. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed and areas of future research are proposed.

The Insight Paradox: is Better Insight Associated with Depression Among Patients with Schizophrenia?

Introduction The insight paradox posits that among patients with schizophrenia, better insight is associated with depressive symptoms. However, available studies are characterized by conflicting results. Methods First, we conducted a systematic review, a meta-analysis and a meta-regression based on 59 available correlational studies. Second, we examined a cross-sectional examination on 80 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in stable phase of the illness. Measures of depressive dimension were based on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), for insight the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD). Furthermore, we assessed self-stigma, self-esteem and psychotic symptoms to test mediating and moderating models (Preacher and Hayes models). Results In the meta-analysis, global insight was associated weakly, but significantly with depression (effect size r=0.14), as were the insight into the mental disorder (r=0.14), insight into symptoms (r=0.14) and symptoms’ attributions (r=0.17). Whereas, insight into the social consequences of the disorder or into the need for treatment were not associated with symptoms of depression. Better cognitive insight was associated with higher levels of depression. Methodological and clinical factors moderated the magnitude of the association between insight and depression. Similar results were observed in the clinical sample, where self-stigma significantly mediated the association between insight and depression. Conclusions In conclusion, both literature and clinical findings indicate that better insight is associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms among patients with schizophrenia: interventions that are aimed at improving insight need to take into account the implications of these findings