Sardinian Alcohol-nonpreferring Research Articles

P.2.002 Rac1 GTPase and PAK activities in lateral amygdala constrain fear memory formation

COLOMBO, G., R. AGABIO, G. DIAZ, M. FÀ, C. LOBINA, R. REALI AND G. L. GESSA. γ-Hydroxybutyric acid intake in ethanol-preferring sP and -nonpreferring sNP rats. Physiol Behav 64(2) 197–202, 1998. γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and ethanol share several pharmacological similarities, suggesting that GHB may exert ethanol-like effects in the central nervous system. The present study was designed to test whether selectively bred ethanol-preferring rats would, unlike ethanol-nonpreferring ones, self-administer GHB, consistent with their higher preference for ethanol. Male ethanol-naive Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats were used. In Experiment 1, GHB solution (1% (w/v) in water) was initially offered as the sole fluid available for 14 consecutive days and then presented under the two-bottle, free-choice regimen, one bottle containing water and the other the GHB solution, for an additional 14 consecutive days. During the free-choice phase, high preference for GHB and intake of pharmacologically relevant daily doses of GHB developed in both rat lines, presumably because the 14-day no-choice period would unmask the reinforcing properties of GHB and lead to acquisition of GHB preference also in the supposedly less susceptible sNP rats. In Experiment 2, the forced GHB drinking phase was reduced to 3 days. Under the subsequent free-choice regimen, daily GHB preference and intake were initially low in both sP and sNP rats; however, after approximately 10 days, GHB preference and intake in sP rats rose progressively and then stabilized to significantly higher levels than in sNP rats throughout the entire free-choice phase. It is likely that episodic binges of GHB intake occurring during the first 10 days resulted in experiencing the reinforcing properties of GHB by sP but not sNP rats. The results of the present study suggest that a) sP rats are genetically more sensitive to the reinforcing effects of both ethanol and GHB than sNP rats; and b) disclosure of the higher sensitivity of sP rats to the reinforcing effects of GHB is a function of the length of the induction procedure. The results are also discussed in terms of differences in GHB receptors contributing to the predisposition to ethanol preference and avoidance, respectively.

Low copulatory activity in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) relative to alcohol-preferring (sP) rats

Background. There is a growing consensus that similar neural mechanisms are involved in the reinforcing properties of natural rewards, like food and sex, and drugs of abuse. Rat lines selectively bred for high and low oral alcohol intake and preference have been useful for understanding factors contributing to excessive alcohol intake and may constitute proper animal models for investigating the neurobiological basis of natural rewarding stimuli.Methods. The present study evaluated copulatory behavior in alcohol and sexually naïve Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and -nonpreferring (sNP) male rats in three consecutive copulatory behavior tests.Results. The main finding was that, under the conditions used in this study, sNP rats were sexually inactive relative to sP rats. To gain more information about the sexual behavior in sP rats, Wistar rats were included as an external reference strain. Only minor differences between sP and Wistar rats were revealed.Conclusions. The reason behind the low copulatory activity of sNP rats remains to be elucidated, but may in part be mediated by innate differences in brain transmitter systems. The comparison between sP and Wistar rats may also suggest that the inherent proclivity to excessive alcohol drinking in sP rats may mainly be dependent on its anxiolytic properties, as previously proposed, and not changes in the reward system.

Gene expression within the extended amygdala of 5 pairs of rat lines selectively bred for high or low ethanol consumption

The objectives of this study were to determine innate differences in gene expression in 2 regions of the extended amygdala between 5 different pairs of lines of male rats selectively bred for high or low ethanol consumption: a) alcohol-preferring (P) vs. alcohol-non-preferring (NP) rats, b) high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) vs. low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats (replicate line–pairs 1 and 2), c) ALKO alcohol (AA) vs. nonalcohol (ANA) rats, and d) Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) vs. Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats, and then to determine if these differences are common across the line–pairs. Microarray analysis revealed up to 1772 unique named genes in the nucleus accumbens shell (AcbSh) and 494 unique named genes in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) that significantly differed [False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 0.10; fold-change at least 1.2] in expression between the individual line–pairs. Analysis using Gene Ontology (GO) and Ingenuity Pathways information indicated significant categories and networks in common for up to 3 or 4 line–pairs, but not for all 5 line–pairs. However, there were almost no individual genes in common within these categories and networks. ANOVAs of the combined data for the 5 line–pairs indicated 1014 and 731 significant (p < 0.01) differences in expression of named genes in the AcbSh and CeA, respectively. There were 4–6 individual named genes that significantly differed across up to 3 line–pairs in both regions; only 1 gene (Gsta4 in the CeA) differed in as many as 4 line–pairs. Overall, the findings suggest that a) some biological categories or networks (e.g., cell-to-cell signaling, cellular stress response, cellular organization, etc.) may be in common for subsets of line–pairs within either the AcbSh or CeA, and b) regulation of different genes and/or combinations of multiple biological systems may be contributing to the disparate alcohol drinking behaviors of these line–pairs.

AA and ANA rats exhibit the R100Q mutation in the GABA A receptor α 6 subunit

The R100Q mutation in the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A) receptor α 6 subunit was previously identified in Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats as a candidate gene influencing alcohol preference and sensitivity. The purpose of the current study was to determine to what extent this mutation and alcohol preference observed in the sP and sNP lines was present in other independently selected rat lines, including inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) and inbred alcohol-nonpreferring (iNP), high-alcohol-drinking 1 (HAD1) and low-alcohol-drinking 1 (LAD1), high-alcohol-drinking 2 (HAD2) and low-alcohol-drinking 2 (LAD2), and Alko Alcohol (AA) and Alko Non-Alcohol (ANA). Sequence analysis was first performed to screen for the R100Q mutation in several samples. Later, a genotyping assay was conducted to assess the frequency of the R100Q mutation in larger sample sizes. The R100Q mutation was identified only in the AA/ANA population, with a significantly ( P<.0001) higher frequency in the alcohol-nonpreferring ANA line. The absence of the R100Q mutation in the other rat lines that were selectively bred for alcohol consumption and alcohol preference may be due to genetic diversity among the Wistar stocks used to develop the various lines.

Long-term exposure to a sweetened alcoholic solution does not alter genetic aversion to ethanol in Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats

Results of a recent investigation revealed that selectively bred Indiana ethanol-nonpreferring (NP) rats could be “environmentally” conditioned to consume high amounts of ethanol. Specifically, a long-term exposure to a sucrose-plus-ethanol solution resulted, when sucrose was faded out, in an ethanol intake that was equivalent to that recorded in the counterpart ethanol-preferring (P) rats. The current study was designed to extend the above investigation to the selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats. To this aim, rats of the sNP and Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) lines were exposed to a 108-day sucrose-fading procedure, which was virtually identical to that previously used with NP and P rats. Results indicated that intake of the sucrose-plus-ethanol solution in sNP rats was maintained predominantly by sucrose, as negligible intakes of ethanol were observed when sucrose was faded out. In contrast, sP rats maintained high levels of ethanol intake both during and after the induction procedure. These results support the suggestion that an environmental manipulation such as a long-term exposure to a sucrose-fading procedure did not overcome the genetically determined predisposition to avoid ethanol in sNP rats.

Molecular characterization of new polymorphisms at the β2, α1, γ2 GABA A receptor subunit genes associated to a rat nonpreferring ethanol phenotype

Recent preclinical and clinical studies have indicated a possible involvement of the genes encoding for the GABA A receptor subunits α6, β2, α1 and γ2 in the genetic susceptibility to alcohol abuse. We have recently found an (R) to (Q) mutation in codon 100 of the α6 GABA A subunit, that segregated in a rat line selectively bred for its voluntary ethanol aversion, Sardinian alcohol nonpreferring (sNP), but not in their Sardinian alcohol preferring (sP) counterpart, selected for its ethanol preference. In the present study the molecular composition of other GABA A subunits (β2, α1 and γ2) were analyzed in order to further investigate the involvement of the GABA A receptors in the genetic predisposition to voluntary alcohol intake. Automated sequencing analysis indicated the presence of six new silent substitutions (289 T→C in the β2 gene; 115 G→A in the α1 gene; 157 G→A, 174 C→T, 347 A→G and 385 A→T in the γ2 gene), in sNP but not in sP rats. These polymorphisms were linked to the α6 R100Q mutation previously described in sNP rats. The strict association between the α6 point mutation and the new polymorphisms found in the β2, α1 and γ2 genes, demonstrate that such genes belong to the same cluster and are inherited together in the rat. These results sustain the synteny for these clusters between the rodent and human genomes, and suggest that mutated GABA A β2, α6, α1 and γ2 subunit genes might contribute to the expression of an ethanol nonpreferring phenotype in a rat line that voluntarily avoids alcoholic solutions.

Reduced DAT- and DBH-immunostaining in the limbic system of Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats

We have recently shown that tyrosine-hydroxylase immunostaining (TH-IM) is selectively decreased in the cingulate cortex and in the shell of the nucleus accumbens (nAcc) of Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats (sP) when compared with Sardinian alcohol-non preferring (sNP) and Wistar (W) rats. Since these regions contain both dopamine and noradrenaline (NA) fibers, clarification of the dopaminergic and noradrenergic contribution to the decreased TH-immunoreactivity was needed. To this aim, we carried out the present immunohistochemistry study using two antibodies raised against dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH), the enzyme responsible for the conversion of dopamine into noradrenaline, and against the dopamine transporter (DAT), as markers for noradrenergic and dopaminergic fibers, respectively. The results show that DBH-immunostaining (DBH-IM) and DAT-immunostaining (DAT-IM) were both lower in the cingulate cortex of the sP rats with respect to sNP and W rats. In the shell of the nAcc a reduced DAT-IM in sP rats was found, while the DBH-IM did not differ between the three lines of rats. The analysis of the cell-body area of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus, revealed no differences between sP, sNP and W rats. These results indicate a selective reduction of the terminal innervation in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine and NA systems in sP rats. This genetically-determined difference may be involved in the opposite alcohol preference and consumption of sP and sNP rats.

Differences in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in Sardinian alcohol-preferring and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring rats

In the present study, we investigated whether aversion to the pharmacological effects of ethanol developed to a differential extent in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats, and whether this different response was consistent with their genetically determined differences in ethanol preference and consumption. To this purpose, a conditioned taste aversion paradigm was used. Male sP and sNP rats were exposed to five sessions in which a 20-min availability of a saccharin solution (1 g/l) was paired to the injection of ethanol (0, 0.5, or 1 g/kg, i.p.), delivered immediately after removal of the saccharin bottle (conditioning phase). Subsequently, the choice between saccharin solution and water was offered for 18 consecutive daily 20-min sessions (postconditioning phase). Ethanol at 1g/kg produced a marked aversion to saccharin in sNP rats: The reduction in saccharin intake was already evident on the second day of the conditioning phase and lasted for 15 days of the postconditioning phase. In contrast, this dose of ethanol elicited a modest, if any, conditioned taste aversion in sP rats, although blood ethanol levels were comparable to those assessed in sNP rats. These results indicate the existence of a differential degree of aversion to the postingestional effects of ethanol between sP and sNP rats, and support the suggestion that it may contribute, at least in part, to the opposite preference for and consumption of ethanol monitored in these rat lines.

Alcohol stimulates motor activity in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP), but not in Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP), rats

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of low doses of ethanol on motor activity in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats. Ethanol was acutely administered at the doses of 0, 0.25, and 0.5 g/kg (i.p.) immediately before rat exposure to an open-field arena for 15 min. The number of square crossings, used as index of motor activity, was significantly lower in saline-treated sP than in saline-treated sNP rats, suggestive of a genetically determined higher emotional state in sP than in sNP rats. Ethanol administration resulted in a dose-dependent, significant increase in the number of square crossings in sP rats, whereas it was completely ineffective in sNP rats. These results suggest to us that a positive relationship exists between ethanol preference and ethanol-induced motor stimulation in sP/sNP rat lines.

Preprotachykinin-A gene expression in the forebrain of Sardinian alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats

Increasing evidence suggests that TKergic mechanisms might play a role in ethanol intake control. Preprotachykinin-A (PPT-A) mRNA brain levels were measured in Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats. PPT-A mRNAs were about 50% lower in sP than in sNP rats in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), whereas levels in the olfactory tubercle (Tu) were about 30% higher in sP than in sNP rats. Our findings suggest that altered PPT-A gene expression might contribute to the different ethanol preference and intake of sP opposite to sNP rats.

γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid Intake in Ethanol-preferring sP and -nonpreferring sNP Rats

COLOMBO, G., R. AGABIO, G. DIAZ, M. FÀ, C. LOBINA, R. REALI AND G. L. GESSA. γ-Hydroxybutyric acid intake in ethanol-preferring sP and -nonpreferring sNP rats. Physiol Behav 64(2) 197–202, 1998. γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and ethanol share several pharmacological similarities, suggesting that GHB may exert ethanol-like effects in the central nervous system. The present study was designed to test whether selectively bred ethanol-preferring rats would, unlike ethanol-nonpreferring ones, self-administer GHB, consistent with their higher preference for ethanol. Male ethanol-naive Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats were used. In Experiment 1, GHB solution (1% (w/v) in water) was initially offered as the sole fluid available for 14 consecutive days and then presented under the two-bottle, free-choice regimen, one bottle containing water and the other the GHB solution, for an additional 14 consecutive days. During the free-choice phase, high preference for GHB and intake of pharmacologically relevant daily doses of GHB developed in both rat lines, presumably because the 14-day no-choice period would unmask the reinforcing properties of GHB and lead to acquisition of GHB preference also in the supposedly less susceptible sNP rats. In Experiment 2, the forced GHB drinking phase was reduced to 3 days. Under the subsequent free-choice regimen, daily GHB preference and intake were initially low in both sP and sNP rats; however, after approximately 10 days, GHB preference and intake in sP rats rose progressively and then stabilized to significantly higher levels than in sNP rats throughout the entire free-choice phase. It is likely that episodic binges of GHB intake occurring during the first 10 days resulted in experiencing the reinforcing properties of GHB by sP but not sNP rats. The results of the present study suggest that a) sP rats are genetically more sensitive to the reinforcing effects of both ethanol and GHB than sNP rats; and b) disclosure of the higher sensitivity of sP rats to the reinforcing effects of GHB is a function of the length of the induction procedure. The results are also discussed in terms of differences in GHB receptors contributing to the predisposition to ethanol preference and avoidance, respectively.