Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis Research Articles

The Predictive Value of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value for Saphenous Vein Graft Disease in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and high-risk profiles for percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite the frequent use of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) in CABG, their patency rates are lower than those of arterial grafts. Identifying noninvasive methods to determine SVG patency is crucial. Aims: This study investigates the relationship between a novel inflammation marker, pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and SVG patency in post-CABG patients. Methods: The study included 507 patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) due to clinical indications between 2016 and 2023. Patients who had undergone CABG at least one year prior with at least one SGV used were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of SVG stenosis (SGVS). Results: Among the 507 patients, 244 had SVGS. Patients with SVGS exhibited higher levels of diabetes mellitus and inflammatory markers such as NLR, SII, CAR, and PIV. Multivariate analysis identified PIV as an independent predictor of SVGS. ROC analysis showed that a PIV cut-off value > 315.5 predicted SVGS with 75.8% sensitivity and 68.6% specificity. Conclusions: PIV, a simple and easily measurable marker, demonstrated strong predictive value for SVGS in post-CABG patients.

Saphenous Vein Graft (SVG) Stenosis Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

Saphenous Vein Graft (SVG) Stenosis Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

A prospective study on the safety and efficacy of excimer laser coronary angioplasty for the treatment of degenerated great saphenous vein graft

Objective: To explore the safety and efficacy of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) for the treatment of degenerated great saphenous vein graft (SVG). Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, single-arm study. Patients, who were admitted to the Geriatric Cardiovascular Center of Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2022 to June 2022, were consecutively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were recurrent chest pain after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and coronary angiography confirmed that the SVG stenosis was more than 70% but not completely occluded, and interventional treatment for SVG lesions was planned. Before balloon dilation and stent placement, ELCA was used to pretreat the lesions. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination was performed and postoperative index of microcirculation resistance (IMR) were assessed after stent implantation. The technique success rate and operation success rate were calculated. The technique success was defined as the successful passage of the ELCA system through the lesion. Operation success was defined as the successful placement of a stent at the lesion. The primary evaluation index of the study was IMR immediately after PCI. Secondary evaluation indexes included thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), minimal stent area and stent expansion measured by OCT after PCI, and procedural complications (Ⅳa myocardial infarction, no reflow, perforation). Results: A total of 19 patients aged (66.0±5.6) years were enrolled, including 18 males (94.7%). The age of SVG was 8 (6, 11) years. The length of the lesions was greater than 20 mm, and they were all SVG body lesions. The median stenosis degree was 95% (80%, 99%), and the length of the implanted stent was (41.7±16.3)mm. The operation time was 119 (101, 166) minutes, and the cumulative dose was 2 089 (1 378, 3 011)mGy. The diameter of the laser catheter was 1.4 mm, the maximum energy was 60 mJ, and the maximum frequency was 40 Hz. The technique success and the operation success rate were both 100% (19/19). The IMR after stent implantation was 29.22±5.95. The TIMI flow grade of patients after ELCA and stent implantation was significantly improved (all P>0.05), and the TIMI flow grade of all patients after stent implantation was Grade Ⅲ. The cTFC decreased significantly after ELCA (33.2±7.8) and after stent placement (22.8±7.1) than preoperative level (49.7±13.0) (both P<0.001). The minimum stent area was (5.53±1.36)mm2, and the stent expansion rate was (90.0±4.3)%. Perforation, no reflow, type Ⅳa myocardial infarction and other complications were not observed. However, postoperative high-sensitivity troponin level was significantly increased ((67.937±33.839)ng/L vs. (5.316±3.105)ng/L, P<0.001). Conclusion: ELCA is safe and effective in the treatment of SVG lesions and could improve microcirculation and ensure full expansion of stent.

CRP Albumin Ratio May Predict No Reflow in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis.

Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain no-reflow (NR). Some of these hypotheses, state that NR may be caused by damage to the vascular endothelium and an inflammatory process. In a recent study that did not include patients with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), the ratio of C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin (CAR) was found to be associated with NR. Our study aims to evaluate the relationship between CAR and NR in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for saphenous vein graft (SVG). In this retrospective study, among the patients with CABG who underwent primary or elective coronary angiography, 242 patients who underwent PCI to the SVG were selected. The incidence of NR was 19.8% (n = 48). Diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stent length, and CAR were found as independent predictors of NR in multivariate logistic regression analysis (P < .05). Using a cut-off level of .930, the CAR predicted NR with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73% (AUC: .814, 95% CI: .749-.879, P < .001). The CAR was a better predictor than both stent length and LVEF. CAR was found to be the strongest predictor of NR in our study.

Underlying mechanisms of saphenous vein graft stenosis after coronary artery bypass caused by clipping of the side branches: an experimental study.

BackgroundSaphenous veins are regular bypass conduits selected in non-left anterior descending artery (LAD) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Despite the technical errors, acute thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia and arteriosclerosis which could lead to saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure, the metal-clipping-related SVG failure is unique and rare. This study was conducted to investigate the clinical and underlying mechanisms of the metal-clipping-related SVG failure.MethodsWe collected 6 typical cases of the metal-clipping-related SVG failure in 41 patients who were diagnosed graft stenosis by coronary angiograph after CABG in the Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, from January 2020 to September 2021. Furthermore, we built an in vitro model to verify the identical intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) pattern of metal clip.ResultsThere were 6 in 41 cases of SVG stenosis caused by clipping of the side branches. We found that the stenosis of SVG caused by metal clipping mostly occurred at the corner and multipole clipping points. In this situation, great resistance could be felt when pushing the instruments through the stenosis and crystallized cholesterol was rarely caught by the distal protection device. We verified the similar IVUS pattern of metal clip at the side-branches of SVG in vitro.ConclusionsThe metal-clipping-related stenosis may lead to SVG failure. The stenosis of SVG caused by metal clipping mostly occurred at the corner and multipole clipping points. IVUS showed great modality for clarification.

Impact of Atherogenic Indexes in Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis.

ResumoFundamento Os enxertos de veias safenas (EVS) são frequentemente usados em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM).Objetivos Avaliar as relações entre índices aterogênicos e estenose de EVS. Métodos: No total, 534 pacientes (27,7% mulheres, com idade média de 65±8,4 anos) submetidos a CRM e angiografia coronariana eletiva foram incluídos no estudo. Pacientes com pelo menos uma estenose EVS ≥50% foram alocados ao grupo estenose EVS (+) (n=259) e pacientes sem estenose foram classificados como EVS (-) (n=275). O índice aterogênico plasmático (IAP) e o coeficiente aterogênico (CA) foram calculados a partir dos parâmetros lipídicos de rotina dos pacientes. A significância foi estabelecida no nível p<0,05.Resultados O número de pacientes com histórico de hipertensão (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM), acidente vascular cerebral e insuficiência cardíaca (IC) se mostrou significativamente maior no grupo EVS (+) do que no grupo EVS (-). O colesterol total, triglicerídeos e colesterol LDL mostraram-se significativamente mais altos e o colesterol HDL mostrou-se menor no grupo EVS (+) do que no grupo EVS (-). IAP (p<0,001) e CA (p<0,001) apresentaram-se significativamente mais altos no grupo EVS (+) do que no grupo EVS (-). A análise ROC mostra que tanto o IAP quanto o CA mostraram-se melhores que o colesterol HDL, colesterol LDL e colesterol não HDL na predição de estenose de EVS. Na análise multivariada, histórico de DM, HT, acidente vascular cerebral, IC, número de enxertos de safena, colesterol HDL, colesterol LDL, colesterol não HDL, IAP e CA foram fatores de risco independentes para estenose de EVS.Conclusão O IAP e o CA foram preditores independentes de estenose de EVS. Além disso, tanto o IAP quanto o CA têm melhor desempenho na predição de estenose de EVS do que o colesterol LDL, colesterol HDL e colesterol não HDL. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(3):538-544)

Low Wall Shear Stress Is Associated with Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Biomechanical forces may play a key role in saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of 430 post-CABG patients were evaluated and 15 patients were identified with both stenosed and healthy SVGs for paired analysis. The stenosis was virtually removed, and detailed 3D models were reconstructed to perform patient-specific computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations. Models were processed to compute anatomic parameters, and hemodynamic parameters such as local and vessel-averaged wall shear stress (WSS), normalized WSS (WSS*), low shear area (LSA), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and flow rate. WSS* was significantly lower in pre-diseased SVG segments compared to corresponding control segments without disease (1.22 vs. 1.73, p = 0.012) and the area under the ROC curve was 0.71. No differences were observed in vessel-averaged anatomic or hemodynamic parameters between pre-stenosed and control whole SVGs. There are currently no clinically available tools to predict SVG failure post-CABG. CFD modeling has the potential to identify high-risk CABG patients who may benefit from more aggressive medical therapy and closer surveillance. Graphical Abstract.

Comparison of drug-eluting and bare-metal stents in patients with saphenous vein graft stenosis

BackgroundThe use of drug-eluting stents (DES) during the percutaneous coronary intervention of patients with degenerated saphenous vein graft (SVG) is uncertain. Although previous studies showed that DES might decrease the rate of re-intervention in patients with SVG stenosis, randomized controlled trials comparing bare-metal stents (BMS) and DES in SVG lesions have been inconclusive.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes in patients undergoing SVG stent implantation treated with DES or BMS.Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective observational study that included 60 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for SVG lesions, comprising 30 patients who were treated with BMS and 30 patients who were treated with DES at National Heart Institute from March 2015 to March 2018. Three years of outcome and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) were recorded. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, and stroke.ResultsAfter three years, there was no significant difference between the two groups in MACE. MACE was reported in five (16.6%) patients in the DES group vs eight (26.6%) patients in the BMS group (P>0.05). Death was reported in one (3.3%) patient in each group. MI was reported in two (6.6%) patients in the DES group vs three (10%) patients in the BMS group (P>0.05). One (3.3%) patient developed stroke in the DES group vs two (6.6%) patients in the BMS group (P>0.05). The need for repeat revascularization was reported in one (3.3%) patient in the DES group vs two (6.6%) patients in the BMS group (P>0.05). Stent thrombosis was reported in six (20%) patients in the DES group vs four (13.3%) patients in the BMS group (P>0.05)ConclusionOur results in this study showed that there was no significant difference between BMS and DES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for SVG lesions for MACE, such as death, target vessel revascularization, and MI.

Closure of LIMA and a Saphenous vein graft within a short period of six months post CABG in presence of patent RIMA

Appropriate revascularization decision and proper conduit selection are the most important factors to maintain adequate coronary flow and the function of the coronary bypass grafts after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) is considered to be the gold standard choice graft for bypass surgery, as its patency rates are around 90-95%, ten to fifteen years after CABG. Here, we report a case of a 58-year-old man who underwent CABG six months ago and presented for evaluation and management of worsening angina. Cardiac catheterization revealed total occlusion LIMA and severe stenosis of saphenous vein graft (SVG) in the presence of patent right internal mammary artery (RIMA).

New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft – 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry)

BackgroundData regarding the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug-eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare one-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population. Methods and resultsWe carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. This observation included 792 consecutive patients (mean age 69 ± 8.9y), treated with either new-DES (n = 379, 47.9%) or BMS (n = 413, 52.1%). Among patients treated with new-DES compared with BMS, there was a lower risk of MACCE (21.4% vs. 28.3%, HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.025) as well as myocardial infarction (MI) (6.3% vs. 12.1%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.82, p = 0.005) at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the similar, significant reduction in MACCE and MI was observed in favor of new-DES (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.96, p = 0.030; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.92, p = 0.020, respectively). ConclusionIn patients undergoing PCI of SVG, the use of new-DES is associated with a reduced 1-year rate of MACCE and MI compared to BMS.

Rotational Atherectomy Before Stenting in the Body of a Saphenous Vein Graft

Management of stenosis of saphenous vein grafts in Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients remains challenging despite the advance in interventional cardiology techniques. Rotational atherectomy is an adjunctive technique used in certain anatomical conditions in native coronary arteries; its use in saphenous vein graft is still contra-indicated by the manufacturer, and has only been reported in few cases in the literature. We report a case of a calcified, non-dilatable, distal saphenous vein graft to Circumflex lesion in a heart failure patient presenting with Non STEMI. The lesion was just proximal to the anastomosis and could not be crossed. Because of high surgical risk, and against manufacturer guidelines, rotational atherectomy of the lesion was performed and was successful with a very good angiographic result. Rotational atherectomy to facilitate percutaneous interventions in saphenous vein graft lesions is feasible, and could be attempted in experienced centers provided the absence of luminal thrombus or dissection.

The Predictive Effects of Clinical Hematological Changes on Saphenous Graft Patency after Coronary Artery Surgery.

ObjectivesTo investigate the association between clinical hematologic parameters and saphenous vein graft failure after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.MethodsA total of 1950 consecutive patients underwent isolated on-pump coronary artery surgery between November 2010 and February 2013. Of these, 284 patients met our inclusion criteria; their preoperative clinical hematological parameters were retrospectively obtained for this cohort study. And of them, 109 patients underwent conventional coronary angiography after graft failure was revealed by coronary computed tomography angiography. The primary endpoint was to catch at least one saphenous vein graft stenosis or occlusion following the coronary angiogram. We then analyzed risk factors for graft failure. In sequential or T grafts, each segment was analyzed as a separate graft.ResultsIn logistic regression analysis, older age, platelet distribution width, and diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictors of saphenous vein graft failure (P<0.). In contrast, preserved ejection fraction value favored graft patency (P<0.001).ConclusionIncreased platelet distribution width is easily measurable and can be used as a simple and valuable marker in the prediction of saphenous vein graft failure.

Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention.

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES) has been increasingly used for revascularization of saphenous vein graft stenosis without strong clinical evidence favoring their use. Randomized controlled trials comparing DES versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein graft-percutaneous coronary intervention have been inconclusive. Methods and Results We performed a comprehensive literature search through May 15, 2018, for all eligible studies comparing DES versus BMS in patients with saphenous vein graft stenosis in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization. Six randomized controlled trials were eligible and included 1582 patients, of whom 797 received DES and 785 received BMS. The follow-up period ranged from 18 months to 60 months. There was no statistically significant difference between DES and BMS for all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR],1.11; 95% CI, 0.0.77-1.62; P=0.57), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.57; P=0.99), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.63-1.10; P=20), target vessel revascularization (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48-1.11; P=0.14), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.48-1.16; P=0.19), or stent thrombosis (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.42-2.65; P=0.90). Conclusions In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions, our results showed that there was no significant difference between DES and BMS for mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.

Intensive versus moderate statin therapy and early graft occlusion after coronary bypass surgery: The Aggressive Cholesterol Therapy to Inhibit Vein Graft Events randomized clinical trial

ObjectiveStatins prevent saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease and improve outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, the optimal postoperative statin dose remains unclear. The Aggressive Cholesterol Therapy to Inhibit Vein Graft Events trial was undertaken to evaluate whether early postoperative high-dose statin therapy reduces SVG occlusion compared with conventional moderate-dose therapy. MethodsIn this pilot, multicenter, double-blind randomized trial, 173 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery with SVG were randomized to receive 10 mg or 80 mg atorvastatin daily for 1 year. The primary outcome was SVG occlusion at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were SVG stenosis and major adverse cardiovascular events. ResultsDuring trial enrollment, patients randomized to 80 mg atorvastatin achieved significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < .00001). One-year graft assessment was performed in 145 patients (83.8%). The primary outcome, SVG occlusion at 1 year, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (12.9% vs 11.4% for 10 mg atorvastatin vs 80 mg atorvastatin; P = .85). The incidence of vein graft stenosis also did not significantly differ between the groups (P = .54). However, there was a trend toward fewer patients developing vein graft disease (either occlusion or stenosis) in the 80 mg atorvastatin group (29.2% vs 19.2%, 10 mg atorvastatin vs 80 mg atorvastatin; P = .18). Freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was similar between the groups (P = .27). ConclusionsCompared with 10 mg atorvastatin, 80 mg atorvastatin did not significantly reduce vein graft occlusion 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in this pilot trial.

Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Deferral in Saphenous Vein Graft Narrowing

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to improve clinical decision-making for revascularization in intermediate coronary stenosis in native coronary arteries of patients with stable coronary disease. However, its use for saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions has not been well validated. We sought to determine the prognostic value of deferring intervention in lesions with FFR >0.8 in SVG lesions. Clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic variables and long-term outcomes were recorded in consecutive patients in whom percutaneous coronary intervention was deferred based on an FFR >0.8 for intermediate native coronary artery or SVG stenosis. Thirty-three patients underwent FFR of SVG lesions and were compared with 532 patients who underwent native vessel FFR during the same period. There were no differences in age (66.6 [interquartile range, IQR 63 to 76] vs 65 years [IQR 61 to 70]; p = 0.12), diabetes (41% vs 50%; p = 0.35), or hypertension (94% vs 97%; p = 0.71). During a median follow-up of 3.2 years (IQR 1.7 to 4.6 years) major adverse cardiac event was significantly higher in SVG group (36% vs 21%; log rank p = 0.01). Similarly, the rate of target vessel failure was significantly higher in the SVG group (27% vs 14%; p = 0.01). Deferred SVG lesions had the worst survival free of target vessel failure compared with deferred native lesions in both patients with and without previous CABG. An SVG lesion was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events on Cox proportional hazards analysis (hazard ratio 2.26; confidence interval 1.19, 4.28; p = 0.01). In conclusion, nonischemic FFR carries a significantly worse prognosis in SVG compared with non-SVG lesions. Caution is warranted in utilizing FFR for clinical decision-making in SVG lesions.

19th Interventional Cardiology Workshop New Frontiers in Interventional Cardiology: December 6th, 2018, Krakow, Poland.

BackgroundData regarding the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare 1-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population.MethodsWe carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. This observation included 792 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 ±8.9 years), treated with either new-DES (n = 379, 47.9%) or BMS (n = 413, 52.1%).ResultsIn unmatched cohort patients treated with new-DES vs. BMS had lower MACCE (28.3% vs. 21.4%, HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50–0.95, p = 0.025) as well as myocardial infarctions (MI) (12.1% vs. 6.3%; HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30–0.82, p = 0.005) at 1 year. After propensity score matching similar, significant reduction in MACCE and MI was sustained in new-DES vs. BMS groups (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46–0.96, p = 0.030; and HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31–0.92, p = 0.020, respectively).ConclusionsIn patients undergoing PCI of SVG, the use of new-DES is associated with a reduced 1-year rate of MACCE and MI compared to BMS.

Aspirate from human stented saphenous vein grafts induces epicardial coronary vasoconstriction and impairs perfusion and left ventricular function in rat bioassay hearts with pharmacologically induced endothelial dysfunction.

Stent implantation into aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts (SVG) releases particulate debris and soluble vasoactive mediators, for example, serotonin. We now analyzed effects of the soluble mediators released into the coronary arterial blood during stent implantation on vasomotion of isolated rat epicardial coronary artery segments and on coronary flow and left ventricular developed pressure in isolated perfused rat hearts. Coronary blood was retrieved during percutaneous SVG intervention using a distal occlusion/aspiration protection device in nine symptomatic patients with stable angina pectoris and a flow‐limiting SVG stenosis. The blood was separated into particulate debris and plasma. Responses to coronary plasma were determined in isolated rat epicardial coronary arteries and in isolated, constant pressure‐perfused rat hearts (±nitric oxide synthase [NOS] inhibition and ±serotonin receptor blockade, respectively). Coronary aspirate plasma taken after stent implantation induced a stronger vasoconstriction of rat epicardial coronary arteries (52 ± 8% of maximal potassium chloride induced vasoconstriction [% KClmax = 100%]) than plasma taken before stent implantation (12 ± 8% of KClmax); NOS inhibition augmented this vasoconstrictor response (to 110 ± 15% and 24 ± 9% of KClmax). Coronary aspirate plasma taken after stent implantation reduced in isolated perfused rat hearts only under NOS inhibition coronary flow by 17 ± 3% and left ventricular developed pressure by 25 ± 4%. Blockade of serotonin receptors abrogated these effects. Coronary aspirate plasma taken after stent implantation induces vasoconstriction in isolated rat epicardial coronary arteries and reduces coronary flow and left ventricular developed pressure in isolated perfused rat hearts with pharmacologically induced endothelial dysfunction.

Comparison of Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis More Than 5 Years After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Graft stenosis may be associated with future graft failure. The purpose of this investigation was to compare graft stenosis between radial artery (RA) grafts and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) at least 5 years postoperatively using the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study (RAPS) data. Two hundred thirty-four patients underwent late invasive angiography after coronary artery bypass operations. The study population consists of 163 patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow of both the RA graft and study SVGs. Angiograms were reviewed centrally and in a blinded fashion. Graft stenosis was recorded for the proximal anastomosis, graft body, and distal anastomosis; significant stenosis was defined as greater than or equal to 50%. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were reported in patients with and those without significant graft stenosis. There was no difference in significant graft stenosis of the patent RA grafts and SVGs (14 of 163 [8.6%] versus 19 of 163 [11.7%]) or in the proximal anastomosis (5 of 163 [3.1%] versus 5 of 163 [3.1%]), graft body (6 of 163 [3.7%] versus 13 of 163 [8.0%]), or distal anastomosis (4 of 163 [2.5%] versus 5 of 163 [3.1%]) considered separately. However, the overall burden of graft body disease was higher in SVGs (p= 0.03). MACE was higher in patients with significant graft stenosis than in patients without stenosis (10 of 28 [35.7%] versus 7 of 135 [5.2%]; p< 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rates of significant stenosis of patent RA grafts and SVGs more than 5 years postoperatively. However, the burden of graft body stenosis was less in RA grafts compared with SVGs, suggesting that the RA grafts will continue to outperform the SVGs late after operation.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in saphenous vein grafts (data from OCTOPUS registry)

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) with metallic stents is associated with a high rate of restenosis (19–21%) and target vessel failure in the long-term follow-up [1]. Potentially, implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (ABSORB, Abbott Laboratories) into the stenotic SVG may be an alternative to metallic stents [2]. Although the effectiveness of BVS in treatment of de novo coronary lesions in native vessels is well documented [3], none of the previous studies evaluated the results of BVS implantation into SVG. Recently, we reported an imaging follow-up of a case of successful BVS implantation to treat a de novo stenotic SVG lesion [4–6]. Therefore, in this report we present pilot results from the OCTOPUS registry of a subgroup of patients with significant de novo SVG stenosis treated with BVS implantation.

Early and midterm major adverse cardiac events in patient with saphenous vein graft using direct stenting or embolic protection device stenting

Background:The treatment of an occluded saphenous vein graft (SVG) with percutaneous coronary intervention may encounter major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE rates have been reduced significantly by using the embolic protection device (EPD).Objectives:The aim of this study was to clarify the risks and the benefits of embolic protection devices.Patients and Methods:In a prospective, non-randomized observational study, patients aged 33 to 85 years old who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention due to SVG stenosis at our tertiary care center were enrolled between 2009 and 2011. The incidence rates of adverse events, including MACE, were obtained during the patients’ hospitalization and at 30-day and 6-month follow-up. MACE included death, Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, in-stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization.Results:From 150 patients enrolled to the study, 128 (85.3%) patients underwent direct stenting and the rest underwent the EPD procedure. In-hospital MACE occurred in 17.2% of the patients in the direct stenting group versus only 9.1% in the EPD group (P = 0.530). MACE incidence was gradually increased at one and 6-month follow-up periods in the direct stenting group (19.5% and 21.9%, respectively), and remained unchanged in the EPD group (9.1% at six-month follow-up). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that the stenting procedure type could not predict early and midterm MACE with the presence of baseline characteristics as cofounders.Conclusions:Despite the considerable lower early and midterm MACE rates, numerically following the EPD procedure compared to direct stenting, the difference in the MACE rates between the two groups was not significant.