Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Relationship between systemic immune-inflammation index and no-reflow in percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous grafts.

Objective: In this study, we investigated the occurrence of no-reflow (NR) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) and its relationship with a new systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) that determines inflammation. Methods: We studied 303 patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation who underwent PCI for SVG disease. Results: NR formation during SVG PCI was significantly higher in patients with high SII (p < 0.001). NR occurrence was 12.8% when SII was ≤548 and 41.9% when SII was >548. Conclusion: Our study is the first to investigate SII as the state of inflammation and its effect on theSVG PCI. Patients with higher SII have a higher risk of NR duringanSVG for PCI.

Characteristics of Radial Artery Coronary Bypass Graft Failure and Outcomes Following Subsequent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BackgroundWhen patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), targeting the native vessel is preferred. Studies informing such recommendations are based predominantly on saphenous vein graft (SVG) PCI. There are few data regarding arterial graft intervention, particularly to a radial artery (RA) graft. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to report the characteristics of arterial graft stenoses and evaluate the feasibility of RA PCI. MethodsThis study included 2,780 consecutive patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI between 2005 and 2018 who were prospectively enrolled in the MIG (Melbourne Interventional Group) registry. Data were stratified by PCI target vessel. RA graft PCI was compared with both native vessel (native PCI) and SVG PCI. Internal mammary graft PCI data were reported. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality. ResultsOverall, 1,928 patients (69.4%) underwent native PCI, 716 (25.6%) SVG PCI, 86 (3.1%) RA PCI, and 50 (1.8%) internal mammary graft PCI. Compared with SVG PCI, the RA PCI cohort presented earlier after CABG, less frequently had acute coronary syndrome, and more commonly had ostial or distal anastomosis intervention (P < 0.005 for all). Compared with patients who underwent native PCI, those who underwent RA PCI were more likely to have diabetes and peripheral vascular disease (P < 0.001 for both) and to present with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.010). The RA PCI group had no perforations or in-hospital myocardial infarctions, though no significant difference was found in periprocedural outcomes compared with either native or SVG PCI. No differences were found between RA PCI and either native or SVG PCI in 30-day outcomes or 3-year mortality. ConclusionsPresenting and lesion characteristics differed between patients undergoing arterial compared with SVG PCI, implying a varied pathogenesis of graft stenosis. RA PCI appears feasible, safe, and where anatomically suitable, may be a viable alternative to native PCI.

76 INSIDE VEIN GRAFT FAILURE: A WORK FOR OCT

Abstract An 84-years-old woman with prior history of triple coronary artery bypass graft and subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein graft (SVG) for right coronary artery (RCA) was admitted for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Coronary angiography showed chronic occlusion of native vessels and good flow in all grafts, in absence of critical stenoses. However, SVG for RCA presented a small filling defect of non-univocal interpretation (atherothrombosis, thromboembolus, venous valve). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed for better assessment of the lesion, which was found to be a red thrombus, overlying a ruptured thin-cap fibroatheroma. To reduce the risk of distal embolization, a well-known complication of SVG PCI, direct stenting with conservative stent sizing was performed: everolimus-eluting stent diameter (3,5 mm) was chosen according to mean reference lumen diameter, while length (18 mm) was determined to obtain complete plaque coverage. Repeated OCT showed proximal stent malapposition and underexpansion at the mid portion. The stent was post-dilated with 4,0×12 mm non-compliant balloon and final OCT showed correction of both malapposition and underexpansion. The presented case offers an example of the advantages of intravascular imaging in diagnosis and treatment of SVG lesions. Venous grafts have high failure rate: up to 12% of graft are occluded before hospital discharge and up to 60% after 10 years. While in the first year graft occlusion is mainly caused by neointimal hyperplasia, after this period neoatherosclerosis is the leading cause of failure, as exemplified in the case. Intravascular imaging, and particularly OCT, may help to elucidate graft failure mechanism, with important implications for treatment strategy. Moreover, SVG interventions have higher incidence procedural complications, particularly no-reflow and periprocedural myocardial infarction, due to high plaque burden and friable atheromatous material. Proposed strategies to mitigate procedural risk include use of embolic protection devices, direct stenting and use of undersized stents. In this complex setting, intravascular imaging can guide stent sizing and optimization, thus reducing procedural complications and long-term lesion failure.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus saphenous vein graft in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized PROCTOR trial

Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) frequently require repeat percutaneous revascularization due to advanced age, progressive coronary artery disease and bypass graft failure. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of either the bypass graft or the native coronary artery may be performed. Randomized trials comparing native vessel PCI with bypass graft PCI are lacking and long-term outcomes have not been reported. PROCTOR (NCT03805048) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, that will include 584 patients presenting with saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure and a clinical indication for revascularization, as determined by the local Heart Team. The trial is designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients randomly allocated in a 1:1 fashion to either a strategy of native vessel PCI or SVG PCI. The primary study endpoint is a 3-year composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause mortality, non-fatal target coronary territory myocardial infarction [MI], or clinically driven target coronary territory revascularization). At 3-years, after evaluation of the primary endpoint, follow-up invasive coronary angiography will be performed. Secondary endpoints comprise individual components of MACE at 1, 3 and 5 years follow-up, PCI-related MI, MI >48 hours after index PCI, target vessel failure, target lesion revascularization, renal failure requiring renal-replacement therapy, angiographic outcomes at 3-years and quality of life (delta Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading Scale and Rose Dyspnea Scale). PROCTOR is the first randomized trial comparing an invasive strategy of native coronary artery PCI with SVG PCI in post-CABG patients presenting with SVG failure.

Association of CABG SYNTAX score with long term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing SVG PCI.

The CABG SYNTAX score (CSS) has been recommended as an objective and quantitative evaluation tool for coronary anatomic complexity after CABG. We aimed at evaluating the long-term prognostic value of the CSS and its relationship with the composite criteria of all-cause death, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and/or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein graft (SVG). We retrospectively evaluated 232 patients who were admitted with MI and underwent PCI of SVGs, between 2012 and 2018. The study population was divided into two groups according to the results of the median pre-PCI CSS. The composite criteria of all-cause death/CVA/non-fatal MI were observed in 107 patients (46.1%). The incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher among the patients with a high pre-PCI CSS (p < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that both pre-PCI CSS (HR = 1.678, 95% CI = 1.082-2.602, p = .021) and post-PCI CSS (HR = 1.663, 95% CI = 1.066-2.596, p = .025) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative curves divided by the median of the pre-PCI CSS demonstrated that, compared with the low pre-PCI CSS group, the high-score group was associated at five years with higher composite criteria of all-cause death/CVA/non-fatal MI (low, 40.3%; high, 57.8%; p = .015). Pre-PCI CSS is a significant prognostic factor for the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with previous CABG who underwent PCI of SVG.

Contemporary coronary artery bypass graft surgery and subsequent percutaneous revascularization.

Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are susceptible to bypass graft failure and progression of native coronary artery disease. Although the saphenous vein graft (SVG) was traditionally the most-used conduit, arterial grafts (including the left and right internal thoracic arteries and the radial artery) have improved patency rates. However, the need for secondary revascularization remains common, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the most common modality of secondary revascularization after CABG surgery. Procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes differ considerably from those associated with PCI in patients without previous CABG surgery, owing to altered coronary anatomy and differences in conduit pathophysiology. In particular, SVG PCI carries an increased risk of complications, and operators are shifting their focus towards embolic protection strategies and complex native-vessel interventions, increasingly using SVGs as conduits to facilitate native-vessel PCI rather than pursuing SVG PCI. In this Review, we discuss the differences in conduit pathophysiology, changes in CABG surgery techniques, and the latest evidence in terms of PCI in patients with previous CABG surgery, with a particular emphasis on safety and long-term efficacy. We explore the subject of contemporary CABG surgery and subsequent percutaneous revascularization in this complex patient population.

Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: From Pathophysiology to Prevention and Treatment Strategies.

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remain the most frequently used conduits in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Despite advances in surgical techniques and pharmacotherapy, SVG failure rates remain high, often leading to repeat coronary revascularization. The no-touch SVG harvesting technique (minimal graft manipulation with preservation of vasa vasorum and nerves) reduces the risk of SVG failure, whereas the effect of the off-pump technique on SVG patency remains unclear. Use of buffered storage solutions, intraoperative graft flow measurement, careful selection of the target vessels, and physiological assessment of the native coronary circulation before CABG may also reduce the incidence of SVG failure. Perioperative aspirin and high-intensity statin administration are the cornerstones of secondary prevention after CABG. Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended for off-pump CABG and in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. Intermediate (30%-60%) SVG stenoses often progress rapidly. Stenting of intermediate SVG stenoses failed to improve outcomes; hence, treatment focuses on strict control of coronary artery disease risk factors. Redo CABG is associated with higher perioperative mortality compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); hence, the latter is preferred for most patients requiring repeat revascularization after CABG. SVG PCI is limited by high rates of no-reflow and a high incidence of restenosis during follow-up. Drug-eluting and bare metal stents provide similar long-term outcomes in SVG PCI. Embolic protection devices reduce no-reflow and should be used when feasible. PCI of the corresponding native coronary artery is associated with better short- and long-term outcomes and is preferred over SVG PCI, if technically feasible.

Saphenous Vein Graft Disease Interventions

AbstractIn the current era, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is being increasingly performed using total arterial revascularization or a hybrid procedure of stenting of non-LAD disease and minimal access left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to LAD grafts, in order to minimize the need for vein grafts. Still, we encounter saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease, and it might require PCI, which often presents with unique challenges. The current favored strategy is to attempt PCI of the native coronary, if feasible, especially in long degenerated SVG disease, as it has shown better short- and long-term outcome. PCI is preferred over repeat CABG for early recurrent symptoms after CABG in patent LIMA graft and amenable anatomy patients. Balloon predilatation is not recommended unless delivery of an EPD or stent is not possible. Distal protection should be considered the standard of care for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with older vein grafts, as periprocedural myocardial infarction and no reflow are the Achilles heel of SVG PCI. Intragraft vasodilators should be used liberally, even before balloon angioplasty/stenting. Avoid postdilatation, and usage of undersized but a longer stent length to reduce plaque extrusion through stent struts is preferred. Consider thrombectomy in lesions with a heavy thrombus burden. Keep activated clotting time on the higher side than in conventional PCI. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on the DAPT score is recommended. With all the precautions and care, we still need a fair wind in our favor to sail through the vein grafts disease.

Periprocedural and In-Hospital Outcomes Among Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Graft: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South Asian Country.

BackgroundSaphenous vein graft (SVG) may occlude either early or several months to years after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Doing re-do CABG surgery is associated with higher complication and mortality rate as compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in SVG. However, PCI of SVG is associated with more periprocedural and in-hospital complications as compared to PCI of native coronary arteries. Due to the scarcity of local data in this regard, this study was designed to estimate the periprocedural and in-hospital outcomes among PCI in SVG.ObjectivesWe aim to study the periprocedural and in-hospital outcomes among patients who underwent PCI in SVG.MethodsIt is a retrospective observational study. We reviewed hospital record files of 167 consecutive patients, admitted to Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January 2010 to December 2019, who underwent PCI in SVG.ResultsOut of 167 patients, 145 (86.8%) were male with a mean age of 72.26 (±8.46) years. Hypertension was the most common comorbid condition. Majority of 141(84.4%) patients presented within 6-10 years since the last CABG done. Seventy-eight (46.7%) patients presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 51 (36.9%), and 21 (15.2%) had congestive heart failure and cardiogenic shock on presentation respectively. Coronary angiography was performed in the majority of 155 (92.8%) patients through the femoral artery. The body of the SVG was the most common site affected by the disease. In 88 (52.7%) patients stents were deployed in SVG to obtuse marginal (OM). Drug-eluting stents (DES) were used in 124 (74.3%) patients. 22 (13.2%) of patients developed periprocedural complications, predominantly slow flow and 7 (4.2)% patients had in-hospital complications.ConclusionsPCI of SVG is associated with a high procedural success rate and acceptable risk for periprocedural and in-hospital complications. PCI of SVG may be considered as a safe and efficacious option for the percutaneous intervention of SVG lesions.

Plateletcrit may predict no-reflow after saphenous vein graft interventions in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are procedures with potential complications such as distal embolization, slow or no-reflow phenomenon. Platelets are the main factors in development of thrombus and no-reflow phenomenon. There have been multiple studies that identified the association between plateletcrit (PCT) and cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PCT can predict the development of no-reflow in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing PCI for SVG disease. A total of 181 patients who underwent PCI for SVG disease with NSTEMI were included retrospectively. Platelet indices on admission were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the development of no-reflow during the procedure: no-reflow (n = 32; 18%) and normal reflow (n = 149; 82%). PCT and platelet count were higher in the no-reflow group (0.254 vs. 0.224, P = 0.020; 265.4 vs. 233, P = 0.011, respectively). The PCT cut-off value for predicting no-reflow was calculated as 0.230 by ROC curve analysis with 68.8% sensitivity and 51.0% specificity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PCT was an independent predictor of no-reflow (odds ratio: 5.091, confidence interval: 1.356-19.116, P = 0.016). PCT may be useful in identifying patients at risk for developing no-reflow in patient with NSTEMI undergoing SVG PCI.

CHA2DS2-VASc score as a predictor of no-reflow phenomenon after saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is associated with an increased risk of complications, particularly no‑reflow phenomenon and distal embolization due to low patency rates. The CHA2DS2‑VASc score is a clinical risk stratification tool used to predict thromboembolism events especially in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the CHA2DS2‑VASc score and no‑reflow phenomenon after SVG PCI in patients with non-ST‑segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE‑ACS). In this study, we included 268 patients diagnosed with NSTE‑ACS who underwent PCI for SVG disease in our tertiary cardiovascular center. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 without no‑‑reflow phenomenon (n = 190) and group 2 with no‑reflow phenomenon (n = 78) following the intervention, and then compared based on CHA2DS2‑VASc scores. The CHA2DS2‑VASc score (P <0.001) was significantly higher in group 2, even though no significant difference regarding atrial fibrillation was observed between the study groups. The CHA2DS2‑VASc score (P <0.001), degenerated saphenous vein graft (P = 0.006), and intraluminal thrombus (P <0.001) were found to be independent predictors of no‑reflow phenomenon. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that a CHA2DS2‑VASc score of 4 predicted no‑reflow phenomenon with 67.9% sensitivity and 69.3% specificity. Our findings suggest that the CHA2DS2‑VASc score can be an independent predictor of no‑reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing SVG interventions. As a simple and easy‑to‑calculate score, it might be a useful assessment tool to predict no‑reflow phenomenon before SVG interventions in patients with NSTE‑ACS.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Grafts in a Low to Middle-Income Country.

BackgroundRevascularization of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is challenging and debated for the last few decades. The percutaneous revascularization of SVGs was reported to have poorer long-term outcomes than native coronary artery revascularization.PurposeWe aim to study the peri-procedural complications and long-term outcomes of the percutaneous revascularization of SVGs in a low-middle-income country.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we included 110 patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization from January 2011 to March 2020 and followed them retrospectively for long-term outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events.ResultsThe mean age was 71 ±9, and 81% were male. The most common reason for the presentation was non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (46%). The mean follow-up period of the study was 48±27 months. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (86%). A drug-eluting stent (80%) was placed in most of the patients, followed by a bare-metal stent (BMS) (14%) and percutaneous balloon angioplasty (POBA) (6%). We did not find any significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (P=0.48), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (p=0.69), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p=0.54) with drug-eluting stent (DES) as compared to either BMS or POBA. The mean period from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to SVG percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was 15± 5.5 years. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event, stroke, and female sex were independently associated with MACE.ConclusionThe long-term outcomes of SVG PCI are not affected by the types of stents. Female gender, ACS, and stroke are the independent predictors of MACE after SVG PCI, and statin therapy has a positive impact on the long-term outcomes of SVG PCI.

Inflammatory Conditions in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Saphenous Vein Graft.

The study aimed to evaluate the inflammatory blood parameters in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with a history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein graft (SVG). A total of 347 patients who underwent urgent SVG PCI with the diagnosis of ACS were included in the study. After the application of exclusion criteria, 79 patients were allocated into two groups, namely, successful PCI ( n = 59) and unsuccessful PCI ( n = 20), and included in the statistical analysis. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels were significantly higher in patients with unsuccessful SVG PCI. In the logistic regression analysis, PLR, C-reactive protein, and diabetes mellitus emerged as independent factors associated with unsuccessful SVG PCI. The area under the curve for PLR was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.85, p = 0.006). The cut-off value of PLR (128.99) was associated with 70.0% sensitivity and 69.5% specificity. Elevated inflammatory status is associated with unsuccessful PCI of SVG in ACS patients. Increased PLR levels on admission is an independent predictor of this situation. This cheap and simple marker can help us to predict unsuccessful SVG PCI in ACS patients.

Contemporary Trends, Predictors and Outcomes of Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From the NCDR Cath PCI Registry)

Coronary artery perforation (CP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given the marked increase in high-risk and complex PCIs, careful review and understanding of PCI complications may help to improve procedural and clinical outcomes. Our aim was to study the trends, predictors and outcomes of CP in the contemporary era. This cross-sectional multicenter analysis included data collected from institutions participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry between July 2009 and June 2015. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify predictors of CP and compare the in-hospital outcomes of CP and non-CP patients. Of 3,759,268 PCIs performed during the study period, there were 13,779 CP (0.37%). During the study period, the proportion of PCI that developed CP remained unchanged (0.33% to 0.4%) (p for trend 0.16). Chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI as percentage of total PCI volume increased over the study period (3% to 4%) (p for trend <0.001) with a concomitant significant increase in CTOs with perforation (1.2% to 1.5%, p for trend = 0.02). CTO PCI (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.59) female gender (OR 1.38), saphenous vein graft PCI (OR 1.2), ACC Type C lesion (1.48), cardiogenic shock on presentation (1.15), and use of atherectomy (laser/ rotational) (OR 2.38) were significant predictors of CP. CP patients had significantly higher rates of cardiogenic shock (7.73% vs 1.02%), tamponade (9.6% vs 0.05%) and death (4.87% vs 1.14%) compared with those without CP. Strongest predictors of any adverse events amongst CP were cardiogenic shock (OR 3.93), cardiac arrest (OR 2.02) and use of atherectomy device (OR 2.5). Use of covered stents was also strongly associated with adverse events (OR 3.67) reflecting severity of these CPs. CP in CTO PCI had higher rates of any adverse event than non-CTO CP (26.8% vs 22%, p < 0.001). However non-CTO CP had higher rates of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (urgent, emergent, or salvage) (5.8% vs 4.5%, p = 0.03) and death (6.9% vs 5.6%, p = 0.04). CP in CABG PCI had fewer adverse events compared with those without previous CABG (16.1% vs 24.7%). In a large real world experience, we identified several clinical and procedural factors associated with increased risk of CP and adverse outcomes. The trends in CP remained constant over the study period.

Safety and Efficacy of Embolic Protection Devices in Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions: A Propensity Score Analysis-Multicenter SVG PCI PROTECTA Study.

Background: Evidence concerning the efficacy of the embolic protection devices (EPDs) in saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is sparse. The study was designed to compare major cardiovascular events of all-comer population of SVG PCI with and without EPDs at one year of follow-up. Methods and results: A multi-center registry comparing PCI with and without EPDs in consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The group comprised 792 patients, among which 266 (33.6%) had myocardial infarction (MI). The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined as death, MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke assessed at one year. After propensity score analysis, there were no differences in MACCE (21.9% vs. 23.9%; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.57–1.45, p = 0.681, respectively) nor in secondary endpoints of death, MI, TVR, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stroke at one year in EPDs PCI group vs. no-EPDs PCI group. Similarly, there were no differences between groups in the study endpoints at 30 days follow-up. Conclusions: There were no clinical benefit for routine use of EPDs during SVG PCI in short and long-term follow-up. Further studies are warranted to explore the effect of individual types of EPDs on clinical outcomes.

Saphenous vein graft failure: seeing the bigger picture.

Approximately 50% of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) fail by 5 to 10 years post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and between 20–40% fail within the first year (1,2). While SVG failure can sometimes be silent, when symptomatic events occur, SVG percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed. SVG PCI represents approximately 6% of the total PCI volume in the US (3). Given the aggressiveness of SVG atherosclerosis and the high risk for recurrent SVG failure, what are the optimal prevention and treatment options in such patients?

New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft – 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry)

BackgroundData regarding the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug-eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare one-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population. Methods and resultsWe carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. This observation included 792 consecutive patients (mean age 69 ± 8.9y), treated with either new-DES (n = 379, 47.9%) or BMS (n = 413, 52.1%). Among patients treated with new-DES compared with BMS, there was a lower risk of MACCE (21.4% vs. 28.3%, HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.025) as well as myocardial infarction (MI) (6.3% vs. 12.1%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.82, p = 0.005) at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the similar, significant reduction in MACCE and MI was observed in favor of new-DES (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.96, p = 0.030; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.92, p = 0.020, respectively). ConclusionIn patients undergoing PCI of SVG, the use of new-DES is associated with a reduced 1-year rate of MACCE and MI compared to BMS.

Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention.

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES) has been increasingly used for revascularization of saphenous vein graft stenosis without strong clinical evidence favoring their use. Randomized controlled trials comparing DES versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein graft-percutaneous coronary intervention have been inconclusive. Methods and Results We performed a comprehensive literature search through May 15, 2018, for all eligible studies comparing DES versus BMS in patients with saphenous vein graft stenosis in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization. Six randomized controlled trials were eligible and included 1582 patients, of whom 797 received DES and 785 received BMS. The follow-up period ranged from 18 months to 60 months. There was no statistically significant difference between DES and BMS for all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR],1.11; 95% CI, 0.0.77-1.62; P=0.57), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.57; P=0.99), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.63-1.10; P=20), target vessel revascularization (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48-1.11; P=0.14), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.48-1.16; P=0.19), or stent thrombosis (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.42-2.65; P=0.90). Conclusions In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions, our results showed that there was no significant difference between DES and BMS for mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft interventions. Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The optimal stent for use in saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention is still debatable. Multiple randomized trials have compared drug-eluting stents (DES) to bare metal stents (BMS) in SVG interventions with conflicting results. Authors searched the online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DES to BMS in SVG percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model to calculate the odds ratio for outcomes of interest. Authors studied six RCTs that included 1592 patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The mean follow up was 42 months. Patients mean age was the same in both groups: 70.3 years in the DES group (approximately 93.3% male) and 70.3 years in the BMS group (approximately 93.8% male). Vein graft age was 13.4 years in the DES PCI arm vs. 13.4 years in the BMS PCI arm. Four of the six trials reported data on embolic protection device use: 67% (303/452) in the DES arm vs. 67.9% (309/455) in the BMS arm. The primary outcome of long-term all-cause mortality was not different between DES vs. BMS (15.2% vs. 14.1%, OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67-1.88; P = 0.66). Secondary outcomes were also similar between DES and BMS: major adverse cardiovascular events (31.6% vs. 33.1%, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.45-1.38; P = 0.41); cardiac death (9% vs. 8.6%, OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.55-2.30; P = 0.75); myocardial infarction (8% vs. 9.5%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.47-1.51; P = 0.57); target lesion revascularization (16.4% vs. 14.4%, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.50-1.92; P = 0.95); and target vessel revascularization (19% vs. 19.4%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.41-1.34; P = 0.33). At a mean follow-up of 42 months, no difference was observed in clinical outcomes between DES and BMS in SVG interventions.

Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention extent, complexity and platelet reactivity on outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation

BackgroundRisk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is mainly based on demographics and clinical presentation (stable coronary artery disease [CAD] vs. acute coronary syndromes [ACS]). We investigated the impact of PCI extent and complexity on 2-year clinical outcomes after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) and whether this effect is influenced by clinical presentation and/or high platelet reactivity (HPR) on clopidogrel. Methods and resultsPatients from the prospective, multicenter Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents study were stratified according to PCI complexity, with complex PCI (C-PCI) defined as ≥3 stents implanted, bifurcation PCI with 2 stents, rotational atherectomy use for severely calcified lesions, or left main or saphenous vein graft (SVG) PCI. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) were compared at 2-year follow-up in patients with and without C-PCI. Successful DES PCI was performed in 8582 patients—2255 (26.3%) with C-PCI. C-PCI was independently associated with higher 2-year risk of MACE (adjusted HR [adjHR]: 1.56; 95%CI: 1.29–1.89; p<0.0001), MI (adjHR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.37–2.14; p<0.0001), and ST (adjHR: 2.26; 95%CI: 1.42–3.59; p=0.0006). The association between C-PCI vs. non–C-PCI and the risk of MI and ST was greater in stable CAD than in ACS (Pinteraction=0.04 and 0.03, respectively). SVG PCI, 2-stent bifurcation treatment, and implantation of ≥3 stents were independently associated with MACE. ConclusionsPatients undergoing extensive and more complex PCI experienced worse outcomes after successful PCI. Considering the extent and complexity of PCI revascularization may improve risk stratification.