Sample Of Advanced Cancer Patients Research Articles

Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Indonesian version of the Brief COPE in a sample of advanced cancer patients.

The Brief COPE Inventory has been proven as acceptable psychometric properties to examine coping strategies among cancer patients. However, most psychometric testing studies have been carried out in Western countries, raising concerns about the properties' relevance and applicability in other cultural contexts. This study aimed to present psychometric properties of the Brief COPE in a sample of patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. Specifically, we intended to examine the factorial structure and the measure's validity and reliability. This study included 440 patients from the original study who completed the Indonesian version of Brief COPE. We used exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to assess factor structure and evaluate the structural model fit, respectively. Reliability was demonstrated by internal consistency represented by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The factor analysis identified a 21-items scale with 5-factors (avoidance, religion and acceptance, social support coping, problem solving and distraction). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good model fit. For the whole scale and its subscales Cronbach's alpha coefficients were acceptable signifying good reliability. Convergent, divergent validity and contrast group comparison were evidenced by significant correlations among subscales and the other instruments used. This study shows that the Indonesian version of Brief COPE is a reliable and valid instrument to measure coping in advanced cancer patients and is ready for use amongst this population in the Indonesian cultural context.

Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: Comparison of Pain Classification Features and Pain Intensity across Diverse Palliative Care Settings in Canada.

Background: The goal of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) is to create an international classification system for cancer pain. Previous studies reinforce the need for standardized training to ensure consistency across assessors. There is no universally accepted classification for neuropathic pain. Objectives: Our primary objective was to describe the prevalence of ECS-CP features in a diverse sample of advanced cancer patients, using assessors with standardized training. The secondary objectives were to: (1) determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain using the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG) criteria and (2) examine the relationship between specific predictors: ECS-CP features, age, Palliative Performance Scale, Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), setting, and pain intensity; and neuropathic pain. Methods: A total of 1050 adult patients with advanced cancer were recruited from 11 Canadian sites. A clinician completed the ECS-CP and NeuPSIG criteria, and collected additional information including demographics and pain intensity (now). All assessors received standardized training. Results: Of 1050 evaluable patients, 910 (87%) had cancer pain: nociceptive (n = 626; 68.8%); neuropathic (n = 227; 24.9%); incident (n = 329; 36.2%); psychological distress (n = 209; 23%); addictive behavior (n = 51; 5.6%); and normal cognition (n = 639; 70.2%). The frequencies of ECS-CP features and pain intensity scores varied across sites and settings, with more acute settings having higher frequencies of complex pain features. The overall frequency of neuropathic pain was 24.9%, ranging from 11% (hospices) to 34.2% (palliative outpatient clinic) across settings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age <60 years, MEDD ≥19 mg, pain intensity ≥7/10, and incident pain were significant independent predictors of neuropathic pain (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The ECS-CP was able to detect salient pain features across settings. Furthermore, the frequencies of neuropathic pain utilizing the NeuPSIG criteria fits within the lower-end of literature estimates (13%-40%). Further research is warranted to validate the NeuPSIG criteria in cancer pain.

The use of complementary alternative medicines in advanced cancer patients followed at home.

ObjectivesTo assess the use of complementary alternative medicines (CAM) in advanced cancer patients followed at home.MethodsA consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients admitted to a home palliative care program was invited to participate in the study in a period of two months. Demographic characteristics, religious belief, education level, diagnosis, and socio-economic condition were recorded. Patients were asked about the use of CAM, considered to be a health-related treatment practiced outside the established health services. Information about CAM indications and those who prescribed or suggested CAM were also collected.ResultsTwo hundred and eighty-three advanced cancer patients followed at home were surveyed. Twelve patients (4.2%) were receiving CAM. The indication and type of CAM were variable, as well as the costs. Given the low number of patients taking CAM, no further analysis was performed.ConclusionA limited number of advanced cancer patients followed at home were using CAM. Further multicenter studies with a larger sample should be performed to provide information about such therapies, also including eventual benefits.

The Role of Religiosity in Symptom Expression of Advanced Cancer Patients.

The aim of this study was to assess the religious pattern and its impact on symptom expression in patients with advanced cancer. A consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients screened at admission to palliative care. Standard epidemiological data were recorded. Patients were asked about their religious beliefs, the degree of social relationship to existing religions, the role of religion in their life, and the frequency of their prayer. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Hospital Anxiety Depression scale (HADS) were assessed. Two-hundred-eighty-three patients were screened. Age and gender were found to be independently correlated with religious belief (p = 0.042 and p = 0.016, respectively). Gender (females, p = 0.026), age (p = 0.003), lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.022), and higher values of HADS-A (p = 0.003) were independently correlated with the degree of social relationship to existing religions. Gender (females, p = 0.002), lower KPS (p = 0.005), and higher values of HADS-A (p = 0.04) were independently correlated with a more relevant role of religiosity. Gender (females, p < 0.0005), lower KPS (p = 0.001), and drowsiness (p = 0.05) were independently correlated with frequency of prayer. The more the patients have demanding religious issues, the greater the state of anxiety, particularly in older and female patients with a lower KPS. The religious pattern did not have relevant role in the expression of other symptoms included in the ESAS.

CN53 Psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the brief COPE in a sample of advanced cancer patients

The Brief COPE Inventory has been proven as acceptable psychometric properties and become the most often used instrument to examine various coping strategies among cancer patients. However, most of the psychometric properties testing studies have been conducted in Western countries which have different cultures, beliefs and norms, raising concerns with their relevance and applicability in Indonesian cultural context. The purposes of this study were to present psychometric properties of the Brief COPE in a sample of advanced cancer patients in Indonesia. Specifically, we aimed at examining the factorial structure as well as the validity and reliability of the measure. This is a cross-sectional study with a secondary data analysis. The study included 440 patients from parent study who completed the Indonesian version of Brief COPE. The Quality of Life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-general) and Depression, anxiety and Stress (DASS scale) were also measured. Explaratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess factor structure and to evaluate the structural model fit, respectively. Reliability was demonstrated by internal consistency that represented by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Validity was evaluated by content, convergent, divergent and contrast group comparison. The factor analysis identified a 24 items scale with 4 factors (avoidance coping, active and emotional coping, social support and religioun). A CFA demonstrated a good model fit. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the whole scale and its subscales were acceptable ranged from 0.79 to 0.86 indicating good reliability. Content validity were supported by content validity index = 0.97. Convergent, divergent validity and contrast group comparison were evidenced by statistically significant correlations among subscales and the other instruments used. The Indonesian version of Brief COPE may be a reliable and valid instrument to measure coping in advanced cancer patients and is ready for using in this population in Indonesian cultural context.

The Prevalence and Characteristics of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Patients Receiving Low Doses of Opioids for Background Pain.

Simple SummaryThe aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) in patients receiving low doses of opioids for background pain. This prospective study showed that in this population, BTcP prevalence was 69.8%. Many patients did not achieve a sufficient level of satisfaction with BTcP medications, particularly with oral morphine. Data also suggest that better optimization of background analgesia, though apparently acceptable, may limit the number of BTcP episodes.The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) in patients receiving low doses of opioids for background pain. A consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients receiving less than 60 mg/day of oral morphine equivalent (OME) was selected. Epidemiological data, background pain intensity, and current analgesic therapy were recorded. The presence of BTcP was diagnosed according to a standard algorithm. The number of BTcP episodes, intensity of BTcP, its predictability and triggers, onset duration, interference with daily activities, BTcP medications, satisfaction with BTcP medication, and time to meaningful pain relief were collected. A total of 126 patients were screened. The mean intensity of background pain was 2.71 (1.57), and the mean OME was 28.5 mg/day (SD15.8). BTP episodes were recorded in 88 patients (69.8%). The mean number/day of BTP episodes was 4.1 (SD 7.1, range 1–30). In a significant percentage of patients, BTcP was both predictable and unpredictable (23%). The BTcP onset was less than 20 min in the majority of patients. The mean duration of untreated episodes was 47.5 (SD 47.6) minutes. The mean time to meaningful pain relief after taking a BTcP medication was >20 min in 44.5% of patients. The efficacy of BTcP medication was not considered good in more than 63% of patients. Gender (females) (OR = 4.16) and lower Karnofsky (OR = 0.92) were independently associated with BTcP. A higher number of BTcP episodes/day was associated with gender (females) (p = 0.036), short duration of BTcP (p = 0.005), poorer efficacy of BTcP medication (none or mild) (p = 0.001), and late meaningful pain relief (p = 0.024). The poor efficacy of BTcP medication was independently associated with a higher number of episodes/day (OR = 0.22). In patients who were receiving low doses of opioids, BTcP prevalence was 69.8%. Many patients did not achieve a sufficient level of satisfaction with BTcP medications, particularly with oral morphine. Data also suggest that better optimization of background analgesia, though apparently acceptable, may limit the number of BTcP episodes.

Cost Savings Associated With Palliative Care Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.

There is inconsistent evidence that palliative care intervention decreases total healthcare expenditure at end-of-life for oncology patients. This inconsistent evidence may result from small sample sizes at single institution studies and disparate characterization of costs across studies. Comprehensive studies in population-based datasets are needed to fully understand the impact of palliative care on total healthcare costs. This study analyzed the impact of palliative care on total healthcare costs in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients. We conducted a matched cohort study among Medicare patients with metastatic lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancers. We matched patients who received a palliative care consultation to similar patients who did not receive a palliative care consultation on factors related to both the receipt of palliative care and end of life costs. We compared direct costs between matched patients to determine the per-patient economic impact of a palliative care consultation. Patients who received a palliative care consultation experienced an average per patient cost of $5,834 compared to $7,784 for usual care patients (25% decrease; p < 0.0001). Palliative care consultation within 7 days of death decreased healthcare costs by $451, while palliative care consultation more than 4 weeks from death decreased costs by $4,643. This study demonstrates that palliative care has the capacity to substantially reduce healthcare expenditure among advanced cancer patients. Earlier palliative care consultation results in greater cost reductions than consultation in the last week of life.

Episodic Breathlessness with and without Background Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer Patients Admitted to an Acute Supportive Care Unit.

Aim: To characterize episodic breathlessness (EB) in patients with advanced cancer, and to determine factors influencing its clinical appearance. Methods: A consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit was surveyed. Continuous dyspnea and EB were measured by a numerical scale. The use of drugs used for continuous dyspnea and EB was recorded. Patients were asked about the characteristics of EB (frequency, intensity, duration and triggers). The Multidimensional dyspnea profile (MDP), the Brief dyspnea inventory (BDI), the Athens sleep scale (AIS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were also administered. Results: From 439 advanced cancer patients surveyed, 34 and 27 patients had EB, without and with background dyspnea, respectively. The mean intensity and the number of episodes were higher in patients with background dyspnea (p < 0.0005 and p = 0.05, respectively). No differences in duration were observed. Most episodes lasted <10 min. A recognizable cause triggering EB was often found. The presence of both background dyspnea and EB was associated with higher values of MDP and BDI. EB was independently associated with frequency and intensity of background dyspnea (OR = 20.9, 95% CI (Confidence interval) 9.1–48.0; p < 0.0005 and OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.09–3.58; p = 0.025, respectively) and a lower Karnofsky level (OR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.92–0.98, p = 0.05). Discussion: EB may occur in patients with and without continuous dyspnea, and is often induced by physical and psychological factors. EB intensity is higher in patients with continuous dyspnea. The duration was often so short that the use of drugs, as needed, may be too late, unless administered pre-emptively when the trigger was predictable.

Dyadic effects of distress on sleep duration in advanced cancer patients and spouse caregivers.

Short sleep duration is a common problem for both advanced cancer patients and their spouse caregivers. Sleep and distress have been shown to be interdependent in patient-caregiver and spouse dyads, yet virtually, no work has explored the dyadic effects of psychological distress on sleep in advanced cancer patients and spouse caregivers. The goal of the present study was to examine the dyadic impact of anxiety and depression on sleep duration in a sample of advanced cancer patients and their spouse caregivers. It was hypothesized that, for both patients and caregivers, anxiety and depression in individuals would be associated with sleep duration in both themselves (actor effects) and in their spouses (partner effects). Advanced cancer patients and their spouse caregivers (N = 87 dyads) completed cross-sectional questionnaires assessing demographic variables, subjective health, subjective sleep duration, and anxiety and depression symptoms. Controlling for sex, age, and subjective health, individuals' anxiety was negatively associated with their own and their partner's sleep duration. No significant actor or partner effects were found for depression. Results provided partial support for hypotheses. Although past work has demonstrated links between subjective sleep disturbance and anxiety/psychological distress, this is one of the first studies to examine partner effects of distress on sleep disturbance in advanced cancer patients and spouse caregivers.

Abstract 1675: Analytical validation of MSI High detection with GuardantOMNI

Abstract Background: Late stage therapy selection is advancing beyond the detection of classical driver alterations (SNV, Indel, CNV, Fusion) to the use of aggregate biomarkers comprising combinations of SNVs, Indels, and fusions, that reflect the underlying mutational process, indicate the cellular dysfunction, and suggest the neoantigen signature. GuardantOMNI (OMNI), is a highly sensitive 500-gene cfDNA sequencing test designed to detect primary somatic mutations as well as aggregate biomarkers including TMB and DDR pathway defects. The newest version of OMNI introduces MSI biomarker detection, which is an indication for the first FDA-approved pan-cancer therapy. Here we present the first analytical validation study of OMNI MSI-H detection. Methods: Probabilistic models for MSI detection were designed to interrogate instability across &amp;gt;1300 loci, differentiating PCR and sequencing induced artifacts from true biological signals using molecular barcoding as implemented in the Guardant digital sequencing platform. Cut-offs were selected based on the analysis of the training healthy donor cohort and locked prior to validation. Analytical performance was assessed using pre-characterized cell lines, cancer-free donor-samples, and clinical patient samples. Qualitative and quantitative orthogonal confirmation was provided by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and published information. Results: 350 samples were processed for this study, using both 5ng and 30ng cfDNA input levels, and all samples passed sequencing QC metrics established prior to testing. Cell line-based dilution studies performed in triplicate spanning 5ng and 30ng input range as well as in silico simulation demonstrated 95% limit of detection (LoD) at 0.1% Analysis of 121 healthy donor and 16 MSS advanced cancer patient samples identified no false positives (FP). In 240 patient samples with orthogonal confirmation of MSI status from tissue or panel NGS, GuardantOMNI demonstrated 100% analytic sensitivity (3/3) and 100% analytic specificity (237/237) with a PPV of 1 and and NPV 1. Retrospective analysis of 2000+ clinical samples detected MSI high in 16% of colorectal cancers, 4% of prostate cancers, and 0.6% of non-small cell lung cancers. Conclusions: Here we have demonstrated the performance of MSI-H detection with GuardantOMNI (OMNI), which has the potential to accelerate clinical trial enrollment, research and discovery with a single, non-invasive blood sample. Citation Format: Jing Zhao, Alexander Artyomenko, Carlo Artieri, John Latham, Stephen R. Fairclough, Catalin Barbacioru, Elena Helman, John Strickler, Darya Chudova, Richard Lanman, AmirAli Talasaz. Analytical validation of MSI High detection with GuardantOMNI [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1675.

Factors influencing the use of opioids for breakthrough cancer pain: A secondary analysis of the IOPS-MS study.

Controversies exist about the choice and the doses of opioid medication in breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). The aim was to assess factors influencing the use and the doses of opioids prescribed for BTcP. There was performed a secondary analysis of a national, multicentre study that involving 32 centres performed in patients having BTcP. Diagnosis of BTcP was based on a definite algorithm. Patients using opioids for background pain and for BTcP were selected. Average pain intensity and opioids used for background pain and BTcP, and adverse effects were assessed, as well as patient's satisfaction and the grade of mucositis. The analysis was performed in 2,771 patients. Opioid doses given for BTcP were significantly associated with those given for background pain. No relationship between adverse effects and the use and the doses of opioids used for BTcP was found. Drugs and doses were not correlated to the grade of oral mucositis. Nasal fentanyl preparations provided the fastest meaningful pain relief in comparison with other fentanyl transmucosal preparations or morphine preparations (P = 0.000). The majority of patients were satisfied with opioid medications given for BTcP. Only 2.8% of patients reported adverse effects related to opioid medication used for BTcP. Age and gender were independently associated with dosages of some fentanyl products. Opioids for BTcP were effective and safe in a large sample of cancer patients with different stages of disease. Doses of opioids proportional to doses used for background pain seem to guarantee both efficacy and safety. The use of opioids for breakthough cancer pain was effective and safe in a large sample of advanced cancer patients recruited in different stages of disease and settings. Doses of opioids proportional to opioid doses used for background analgesia, seem to guarantee both effectiveness and safety.

Symptom expression in advanced cancer patients admitted to hospice or home care with and without delirium.

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between delirium and symptom expression in advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care services. This is a secondary analysis of a consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients who were admitted to home care and hospices, and prospectively assessed for a period of 10months. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and the MDAS (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale) were measured at admission (T0) and after seven days of home care or hospice care (T7). Of the eight hundred and forty-eight patients screened in the period, 585 were not considered in the analysis for various reasons. The mean age was 72.1years (SD 13.7), and 146 patients were males (55.5%). The mean Karnofsky status recorded at T0 is 34.1 (SD = 6.69). The mean duration palliative care assistance is 38.4days (SD = 48, range 2-220). Of 263 patients who had a MDAS available at T0, 110 patients (41.8%) had a diagnosis of delirium. Of them, 167 patients had complete data regarding MDAS measurement, either at T0 and T7. A larger number of patients (n 167, 63.5%) had delirium after a week of palliative care. Patients with delirium are likely to be older, to have a lower Karnofsky level at T0, and to be home care patients. At T0, weakness, nausea, drowsiness, lack of appetite, and well-being are associated with delirium. At T7, weakness, poor appetite, and poor well-being are significantly associated with delirium. 27% of patients who had a normal cognitive status at T0 developed delirium at T7. In patients with delirium, an improvement in the cognitive status corresponds to a significant improvement in weakness, depression, and appetite. Conversely, the occurrence of delirium in patients who had a normal cognitive status at admission significantly increases the level depression, while the level of weakness and appetite decrease. Symptom expression is amplified in patients with delirium admitted to home care or hospices, while patients without delirium can be more responsive to palliative treatments with a significant decrease in intensity of ESAS items.

Prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain in an outpatient clinic in a Catalan teaching hospital: incorporation of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer pain into the diagnostic algorithm

BackgroundBreakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is defined according to its principal characteristics: high intensity, short time interval between onset and peak intensity, short duration, potential recurrence over 24 h and non-responsiveness to standard analgesic regimes. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) is a classification tool that evaluates different dimensions of pain.The aim of this study was to measure prevalence and the main characteristics of BTcP in a sample of advanced cancer patients and to explore the complexity observed when ECS-CP is incorporated into BTcP diagnostics algorithm.MethodsDescriptive prevalence study (Retrospective chart review). Davies’ algorithm was used to identify BTcP and ECS-CP was used to recognize appropriate dimensions of pain. The study was conducted in a sample of advanced cancer patients attending hospital outpatient clinic in Lleida, Spain. 277 patients were included from 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2015. No direct contact was made with participants. The following information was extracted from the palliative care outpatient clinic database: age, gender, civil status, cognitive impairment status, functional performance status and variables related to tumour. Only BTcP cases were included.ResultsPrevalence of BTcP was 39.34% (63.9% men). Mean of age was 68.2 years. Main diagnosis was lung cancer (n = 154; 31.6%). Metastases were diagnosed in 83% of the sample. 138 patients (49.8%) were diagnosed with 1 type of BTcP and 139 (50.2%) were diagnosed with more than one type of BTcP. In total, 488 different types of BTcP were recorded (mean 1.75 ± 0, 9), 244 of these types (50%) presented a component of neuropathic pain. Addictive behaviour, measured through CAGE test, was present in 29.2% (N = 81) of the patients and psychological distress was present in 40.8% (n = 113).ConclusionsPrevalence of BTcP (39.34%) is similar to the one reflected in the existing literature. Study results indicate that the routine use of ECS-CP in a clinical setting allows us to detect more than one type of BTcP as well as additional complexity associated with pain (neuropathic, addictive behavior and psychological distress).

(248) - Profile of the pharmacological approach needed in order to achieve the best pain control in a population of advanced cancer patients

Pain is still a challenging symptom in advanced cancer patients. The World Health Organisation set up the three-step analgesic ladder in order to better clarify the optimal pharmacological approach in order to achieve a good balance between pain control and adverse related effects. The objective of this study is to analyse the changes observed in the use of the WHO analgesic ladder drugs in relation of pain intensity in a population of advanced cancer patients attended in the out-patient clinic (OPC).The study was carried out on a consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients attended at the OPC. Inclusion criteria: age >18 years, diagnosis of advanced cancer, lack of cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test ≤ 4), pain with VAS > 3 on first evaluation and agreed to participate. Variables recorded: Categorical variables were summarized as percentages (absolute numbers). The sample was divided according to pain intensity on the first evaluation (VAS < 7 vs ≥7) and the analgesic regime used according to the WHO analgesic ladder (first/second/third step). The third step was further divided in long acting opioid (LAO), short acting opioids (SAO) and rapid onset opioids (ROO).We used the chi-squared test to compare groups. For the significative differences (P < 0,05) the McNemar test was applied. A total of 211 patients were included in the study. Mean of age 64, 0 ± 14 years. Men 87, 2%. Lung cancer 41, 2%; Upper-digestive 15, 6%. 136 patients with an initial VAS ≥ 7 (64,45%). Differences were found in the second step of the WHO on pain control (P = .045). Regarding the third step, the differences were related to the first evaluation: third step (global) P = .002, LAO (P = .028) and ROO (P = .043). Those data suggest that significative differences can be found between the use of the different analgesics the WHO ladder and pain intensity.

Characteristics and care pathways of advanced cancer patients in a palliative-supportive care unit and an oncological ward.

A supportive palliative care unit (SPCU) may have a positive impact on patients' care. The aim of this study was to compare the pattern of patients admitted to a specialized SPCU and to a traditional oncologic ward (OW) in a consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients. Data on patients demographics, reasons for and kind of admission, care-giver, anticancer treatments, being on/off treatment or uncertain, origin setting, who proposed hospital admission, the use of opioids, and hospitalization were gathered. The same parameters were recorded at discharge. A follow-up was performed by phone 1month after discharge. Two-hundred patients were surveyed. Awareness of disease was more complete in OW patients (P = 0.001). Uncontrolled pain and symptoms were the prevalent reasons for admission to SPCU (P < 0.0005). Toxicity from chemotherapy was more frequently reported by OW patients (P = 0.001). SPCU patients received higher doses of opioids (P = 0.004). More SPCU patients were referred from home and were discharged home (P < 0.0005 and P = 0.018, respectively). Emergency admissions were more frequently reported in OW patients (P < 0.0005). One month after, more SPCU patients were at home and were still on active treatment (P = 0.002, and P = 0.05, respectively). More OW patients died within 1month (P = 0.001). SPCU allows a better planning admission to hospital and a better care trajectory in advanced cancer patients in comparison to a busy OW, where unselected emergencies more frequently occur.

Delirium assessed by Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale in advanced cancer patients admitted to an acute palliative/supportive care unit

Background: Delirium is often unrecognized in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of delirium assessed by the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) and possible associated factors on admission to an acute palliative/supportive care unit (APSCU). The secondary outcome was to assess changes in MDAS and symptom burden at time of discharge.Methods: A consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients who were admitted to an APSCU was prospectively assessed for a period of 10 months. Patient demographics, including age, gender, primary diagnosis, Karnofsky status, stage of disease, and educational level were collected. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and the MDAS were measured at hospital admission and discharge.Results: A total of 314 patients were surveyed. Of 292 patients with MDAS available at T0, 74 (25.3%) and 24 (8.2%) had a MDAS of 7–12 and ≥13, respectively. At discharge, there was a significant decrease in the number of patients with a MDAS ≥7/30. Higher values of MDAS were associated with age (p = .028), a lower Karnofsky status (p < .0005), gender (male, p = .04), low level of education (p = .002), less awareness of disease (p < .0005), more indications for end-of-life care admission (p < .0005) or other symptoms (p = .026), hospital stay (p = .038) and death (p < .0005). Significant decreases in ESAS were observed in all patients independently of MDAS values (p < .0005).Conclusion: Delirium is highly prevalent in patients admitted to APSCU, characterized by a low mortality due to early referral. Comprehensive assessment and treatment may allow a decrease in the level of cognitive disorders and symptom burden.

Characteristics of patients with an unplanned admission to an acute palliative care unit.

The aim of this cohort study is to compare the symptom burden of patients who have an unplanned admission to an acute palliative care unit (APCU) with patients who have a regular planned admission. A consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients who were admitted to an APCU was prospectively assessed. The reasons and the kind of admission were recorded (unplanned, UP, or planned, P). Anticancer treatments, whether patients were on/off treatment or uncertain, previous care setting, and who referred the patient to the unit were also recorded. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) was used at admission and at time of discharge, as well as the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale. Analgesics and their doses at admission and discharge were recorded. Hospital staying was also recorded. At the time of discharge, subsequent referral to other care settings, and the pathway of oncologic treatment were re-considered. Fifty-five (17.5%) of 314 consecutive admissions recorded in a period of 10months were UP. UP-patients are more frequently referred from other hospitals (P=0.0005), and are reported by physicians of other units (P=0.05). UP-patients have a longer hospital admission (P=0.032), a higher hospital death rate (P=0.025), and are less frequently discharged home (P=0.031). A significant decrease in intensity of ESAS items was observed in both groups, with no differences in symptom burden either at admission and time for discharge. At discharge, opioid doses are higher in UP-patients. An APCU may admit UP-patients at any stage of disease, providing effective treatment outcomes, as reported with P-patients. This study suggests that patients referred from other settings or hospitals may provide specialist advice and rapid symptom control. Although symptom burden is similar, these patients have longer hospital admission, higher hospital death rate, and are less frequently discharged home, suggesting the need for more complex treatments. Such units in a comprehensive cancer center might improve symptom control and pose as referral centers for non-cancer hospitals, emergency departments, or the territory.

The Palliative-Supportive Care Unit in a Comprehensive Cancer Center as Crossroad for Patients' Oncological Pathway.

AimThe aim of this study was to assess how an admission to an acute palliative-supportive care unit (APSCU), may influence the therapeutic trajectory of advanced cancer patients.MethodsA consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients admitted to APCU was assessed. The following parameters were collected: patients demographics, including age, gender, primary diagnosis, marital status, and educational level, performance status and reasons for and kind of admission, data about care-givers, recent anticancer treatments, being on/off treatment or uncertain, the previous care setting, who proposed the admission to APSCU. Physical and psychological symptoms were evaluated at admission and at time of discharge. The use of opioids was also recorded. Hospital staying was also recorded. At time of discharge the parameters were recorded and a follow-up was performed one month after discharge.Results314 consecutive patients admitted to the APSCU were surveyed. Pain was the most frequent reason for admission. Changes of ESAS were highly significant, as well as the use of opioids and breakthrough pain medications (p <0.0005). A significant decrease of the number of “on therapy” patients was reported, and concomitantly a significant number of “off-therapy” patients increased. At one month follow-up, 38.9% patients were at home, 19.7% patients were receiving palliative home care, and 1.6% patients were in hospice. 68.5% of patients were still living.ConclusionData of this study suggest that the APSCU may have a relevant role for managing the therapeutic trajectory of advanced cancer patients, limiting the risk of futile and aggressive treatment while providing an appropriate care setting.

The characteristics of advanced cancer patients followed at home, but admitted to the hospital for the last days of life.

Information regarding advanced cancer patients followed at home who are admitted to the hospital in the last days of life are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics of patients who were hospitalized in the last days of life after being assisted by a home palliative care team. The secondary outcome was to identify possible risk factors for hospitalization. The charts were analyzed of a consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients admitted to hospital wards in the last days of life after being followed at home by a palliative care team. Of 550 consecutive patients followed at home, 138 (25.1%) were admitted to the hospital. Younger patients were more likely to die in the hospital. In a logistic risk analysis adjusted for age, patients with lung and head-neck cancer were more likely to die in the hospital. Patients having a female relative or a female consort as a caregiver were more likely to die at home. CAGE-positive patients (7.25%), and patients with a shorter period of home assistance were more likely transported to hospital before dying (p=0.00 and p<0.024, respectively). The most frequent reason for hospital admission was dyspnea. Admission was more frequent to the oncology ward. Patients who were admitted to the hospital died after a mean of 10.2days (SD 8.2, range 0-40). This study provides preliminary data on the risk factors of hospitalization at the end of life for advanced cancer patients followed at home.

Effect of early palliative care on depression and survival in patients with advanced cancer.

5 Background: We previously demonstrated improved depression and survival in advanced cancer patients participating in two palliative care (PC) RCTs: ENABLE II (EII; N=322) compared intervention vs. usual care, and ENABLE III (EIII; N=207) compared immediate vs. delayed intervention. The interventions were identical, except in EIII, the intervention included support for family caregivers and the delayed group began the intervention 12 weeks after enrollment. Both EII and EIII included an in-person PC consultation, weekly phone sessions facilitated by a nurse coach, and monthly follow-up calls. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale was collected at baseline and every 6 weeks until death or study completion. Our aim was to examine the moderating effects of baseline depression on the intervention effect and on survival outcomes in both RCTs. Methods: After combining data from the two RCTs the sample consisted of 529 patients. We conducted Cox proportional hazard analyses to examine the effect of the intervention (as a time-varying covariate) and baseline depression scores on subsequent survival. Results: The intervention significantly reduced mortality risk in this sample (Hazard Ratio [HR]= 0.78, CI: 0.63-0.98, p=.029). Adding baseline CES-D scores and the interaction of the intervention and CES-D scores as predictor variables yielded a significant interaction (HR= 0.97, p =.035) that remained after controlling for cancer type. Following this analysis, patients were classified as clinically depressed (baseline CES-D 16) or not, and Cox analyses were conducted using the intervention as the sole predictor within each depression group. Receiving the intervention significantly reduced mortality risk among clinically depressed patients (HR = 0.65, CI: 0.44-0.95, p =.029), but not among non-depressed patients (HR = 0.89, CI: 0.65-1.21, p &gt;.45). Conclusions: The ENABLE intervention improved survival in this combined sample of advanced cancer patients. The intervention effect on survival was moderated by baseline depression levels, such that patients who were depressed at baseline and received the intervention had a longer survival compared with non-depressed intervention patients.