SAMe-TT2R2 Score Research Articles

Modified application of SAMe-TT2R2 scoring system in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation for the selection of oral anticoagulants.

The SAMe-TT2R2 score is used for assessing anticoagulation control (AC) quality with warfarin. However, it is hard to apply SAMe-TT2R2 score in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), because it has not been proven in those populations. This study aimed to validate the SAMe-TT2R2 score in Asian patients with AF and suggest a modified SAMe- TT2R2 score for this population. We analyzed 710 Korean patients with AF who were using warfarin. The AC quality was assessed as the mean time in therapeutic range (TTR). Each component of SAMe-TT2R2 score was evaluated for the relationship with AC. Further clinical factors that predict AC were analyzed. Identified factors were re-assorted and constructed as SA2Me-TTR scoring system. Of the components of the SAMe-TT2R2 score, female, age, and rhythm control were associated with AC. Heart failure and renal insufficiency were newly identified factors associated with AC. The modified SA2Me-TTR score was reconstructed with the relevant risk factors (S, female gender, 1 point; A, age < 60 yr, 2 points; Me, medical history of heart failure, 1 point; T, treatment for rhythm control, 1 point; T, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, 1 point; R, renal insufficiency, 1 point). The modified SA2Me-TTR score demonstrated an excellent relationship with the grading of AC. The modified SA2Me-TTR score ≤ 1 identified patients with good AC (hazard ratio 2.46, 95% CI 1.75-3.47). The modified SA2Me-TTR score was useful for guiding oral anticoagulants selection in Asian patients with AF.

SAMe-TT2R2 Score to Predict Time in Therapeutic Range of Vitamin K Antagonists in Asian and Non-Asian patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sex, age, medical history, treatment, tobacco use, and race (SAMe-TT2R2) score helps detect patients at risk of suboptimal anticoagulation control. A score above two suggests poor control; however, non-Caucasian status being assigned two points might hinder the recognition of poor control in patients of other races. To evaluate the SAMe-TT2R2 score's ability to predict poor anticoagulation control [defined as time in therapeutic range (TTR) < 60-70%] in Asian and non-Asian populations on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, SpringerLink, and Web of Science using the keyword "SAMe-TT2R2." Articles published before April 2022 were screened. We gathered mean TTR and diagnostic accuracy data for different SAMe-TT2R2 thresholds and conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. A total of 30 studies were included (N = 36,690). The overall mean TTR differences were -4.88 and -6.41 for the cutoffs of ≥ 3 and ≥ 4, respectively. For non-Asian patients, the mean TTR differences were -3.86, -5.12, and -8.09 for the cutoffs ≥ 2, ≥ 3, and ≥ 4, respectively. For Asian patients, the mean TTR differences were -3.99 and -4.07 for the cut-offs ≥ 3 and ≥ 4, respectively. The highest positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for the Asian subgroup was 1.17 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.28; I2 = 0%, p heterogeneity = 0.500] at cutoff ≥4 and for the non-Asian subgroup, at cut-off ≥ 3, the LR+ was 1.24 (95% CI 1.14-1.34; I2 = 0% p heterogeneity = 0.455). The lowest LR- was found at a lower cutoff for both races (at cutoff ≥ 3 and ≥ 2 for Asian and non-Asian subgroups, respectively). The pooled results of other accuracy parameters were modest at all cutoffs, except for the sensitivity at cutoff ≥ 3 in the Asian subgroup (83.05%). Our study results suggest that a higher SAMe-TT2R2 score resulted in a greater reduction of TTR among Asian and all races. The accuracy parameters showed the highest sensitivity for poor TTR at the SAMe-TT2R2 cutoff of ≥ 3 for Asian patients. However, the ability to identify patients likely to have poor TTR was limited. Further research is needed to enhance the risk assessment for poor anticoagulation control with VKAs. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Scientific Reviews: PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021291865.

Evaluation of the Relationship between Cognitive Impairment and Atria Score Systems in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the main arrhythmia associated with thromboembolic complications and cognitive impairment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between cognitive impairment and different scoring systems developed for AF to improve the medical follow-up of cognitive impairment. Between January 2019 and December 2020, 124 patients between the age of 30 and 80 years, diagnosed with AF for at least 5 years and complaining about memory impairment during cardiological follow-up, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on their cognitive status as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination group 1 consisted of 52 patients with cognitive impairment and group 2 comprised 72 patients without cognitive impairment. The ATRIA bleeding score had a positive moderate correlation (r = 0.454, P < 0.001), the ATRIA stroke score had a strong correlation (r = 0.738, P < 0.001), and the SAMe-TT2R2 score had a strong correlation (r = 0.688, P < 0.001) with cognitive impairment. However, CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scores were not statistically correlated with cognitive impairment. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ATRIA bleeding score was 0.761 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.678-0.844 and P < 0.001; also, for the ATRIA stroke score, AUC was 0.930 with a 95% CI of 0.886-0.974 and P < 0.001. In addition, for the SAMe-TT2R2 score, AUC was 0.895 with a 95% CI of 0.838-0.952 and P < 0.001. In the pairwise comparison of AUC on ROC curves, the ATRIA stroke score and the SAMe-TT2R2 score were statistically similar (P = 0.324). ATRIA bleeding, ATRIA stroke, and SAMe-TT2R2 scores were greater than CHADS2 stroke score (P: 0.0004, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, respectively), but CHA2DS2-VASc and CHADS2 stroke scores were statistically similar (P: 0.402). Both ATRIA stroke and SAMe-TT2R2 scoring systems can provide a better correlation than CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores in patients with AF to evaluate their cognitive status. These two scores can be more useful to monitor the patients with AF for medical follow-up of cognitive status.

Retracted: Evaluation of ABC Bleeding Score and SAMe-TT2R2 Score on the Risk of Bleeding after Anticoagulation in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Complicated with Coronary Heart Disease

Retracted: Evaluation of ABC Bleeding Score and SAMe-TT2R2 Score on the Risk of Bleeding after Anticoagulation in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Complicated with Coronary Heart Disease

Evaluating time in therapeutic range in post-acute myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular thrombus treated with vitamin K antagonist

Abstract Background The standard of care for the treatment of post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with left ventricular (LV) thrombus is oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Due to the narrow therapeutic range of VKA, patients require frequent monitoring. Adequacy of anticoagulation can be assessed by time in therapeutic range (TTR). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of post-AMI patients with LV thrombus treated with VKA, stratified by anticoagulation adequacy in terms of TTR ≥70% vs. TTR &amp;lt;70%. Methods Among 3000 consecutive echocardiogram results containing the keyword "thrombus" from December 2013 to August 2017, we identified 87 post-AMI patients complicated by LV thrombus and treated with VKA oral anticoagulation. Demographics, treatment including TTR, and outcome measures were analysed. Results The cohort was followed up for a median of 4.3 years (IQR 3.6 – 5.3). Patients with and without adequate anticoagulation had no significant differences in terms of age (p = 0.859), gender (p = 0.438), co-morbidities, LV ejection fraction (p = 0.638). A majority of post-AMI patients with LV thrombus treated with VKA had inadequate anticoagulation, as only 25.3% (n = 22) had TTR ≥70%. SAMe-TT2R2 score, a clinical predictor score for adequacy of anticoagulation, was high in the study cohort (median 4, IQR 3 – 5), with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.907). On multivariable analysis, TTR &amp;lt;70% was significantly associated with higher incidence of combined outcomes (presence of bleeding, stroke, or mortality) (HR 2.91 [95% CI 1.01 – 8.39], p = 0.048). Patients with TTR &amp;lt;70% had a higher cumulative incidence of bleeding events while on anticoagulation (p = 0.036), and a higher cumulative incidence of overall stroke on Kaplan-Meier analysis, but did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.077). Patients with TTR &amp;lt;70% had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of combined outcomes (both while on anticoagulation and overall) compared to those with TTR ≥70% (p = 0.026, p = 0.017). Conclusion LV thrombus patients treated with inadequate VKA anticoagulation of TTR &amp;lt;70% had overall poorer outcomes compared to TTR ≥70%. Further studies are needed to evaluate anticoagulation adequacy in this population.

Chinese stroke patients with atrial fibrillation used Robert's age-adjusted warfarin loading protocol obtained good INR results within therapeutic range

To assess whether Roberts’ age-adjusted warfarin loading protocol is effective in Chinese patients and whether the SAMeTT2R2 score can predict international normalized ratio (INR) control. Roberts’ protocol for warfarin titration was applied to patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated with ischemic stroke at the Department of Neurology between 2014 and 2019. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were recorded. A minimum of 1-year follow-up was used to calculate the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the INR. A total of 94 acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF were included in the study. Seventy-seven (81.9%) of the patients had attained stable INR (2.0–3.0) at the fifth dose, and 90.0% of the patients had achieved stable INR on the ninth day. Seventeen (18.1%) of the patients had an INR > 4 during dose-adjustment period. Patients with INR > 4 had significantly lower body weight (53.8 vs. 63.1 kg, P = 0.014), lower rate of achievement of stable INR (35.3% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.000), and lower rate of TTR ≥ 65% (23.5% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.001), but with no significant increase in bleeding risk. A total of 89 patients underwent long-term INR follow-up, of which 58 (65.2%) patients achieved TTR ≥ 65%. Patients with poor TTR had significantly lower body weight (56.3 vs. 63.7 kg, P = 0.020) and lower rate of stable INR achievement (64.5% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.002). All 94 patients had SAMeTT2R2 score ≥ 2. There was no linear association between SAMeTT2R2 score and the rate of TTR ≥ 65% (Ptrend = 0.095). Chinese ischemic stroke patients with NVAF on warfarin can safely and quickly achieve therapeutic INR using Roberts’ age-adjusted protocol and can obtain a good TTR. Lower body weight may be a predictor of poor TTR and INR > 4. Patients who have not attained stable INR after adjusting the dose five times are at high risk for poor TTR. SAMeTT2R2 score may not predict TTR in Chinese ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.

SAMe-TT2R2 to Predict Clinical Outcomes and Time in Therapeutic Range in Patients on Vitamin K Antagonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The SAMe-TT2R2 score identifies patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) who are more likely to have poor time in therapeutic range (TTR); however, the association between SAMe-TT2R2 and clinical outcomes remains controversial. The objective is to assess the association of SAMe-TT2R2 score with clinical outcomes and poor TTR in patients on VKAs. We searched using the term "SAMe-TT2R2." Original articles reporting clinical outcomes and SAMe-TT2R2 scores before October 2021 were included. Odds ratios (ORs) of clinical outcomes, diagnostic accuracy parameters of poor TTR (<60%-70%), and mean TTR were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Ten studies were included (N = 22 894); 4 showed pooled changes in TTR of -3.61% (95% CI:-4.88% to -2.35%) and -3.98% (95% CI: -6.08% to -1.87%) at SAMe-TT2R2 scores ≥2 and ≥3, respectively, compared with lower scores. The diagnostic accuracy parameters for poor TTR were too heterogeneous to conclude. SAMe-TT2R2 ≥3 significantly correlated with all adverse events (OR = 1.43 [95% CI: 1.29-1.54; P < 0.001]), composite thromboembolism (OR = 1.53 [95% CI: 1.19-1.97; P = 0.001]), and composite bleeding (OR = 1.33 [95% CI: 1.12-1.59; P = 0.001] regardless of the indication, while an SAMe-TT2R2 ≥2 significantly correlated with mortality (OR = 1.32 [95% CI: 1.02-1.70; P = 0.033]). We found no relationship between an SAMe-TT2R2 ≥3 and mortality or between a score ≥2 and clinical outcomes. Patients on VKAs with SAMe-TT2R2 ≥3 experienced more adverse events, bleeding, and thromboembolism compared with patients who had an SAMe-TT2R2 <3. However, the score had limited and inconclusive predictability for poor TTR in the study.

Efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation compared between warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants based on SAMe-TT2R2 score

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared between those taking warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) based on SAMe-TT2R2 score.MethodsAF patients using warfarin or NOACs were enrolled from Thailand’s COOL-AF registry. A low SAMe-TT2R2 score was defined as a score of 0–2. The efficacy outcomes were all-cause death, ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and/or systemic embolization (SE). The safety outcome was major bleeding (MB). The secondary outcome was a combination of cardiovascular (CV) death, IS/TIA/SE, or MB. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the event rate between the AF patients taking warfarin and NOACs according to SAMe-TT2R2 score.ResultsA total of 2568 AF patients taking oral anticoagulants were enrolled. Warfarin and NOACs were used in 2340 (91.1%) and 228 (8.9%) patients, respectively. Among overall patients, 305 patients taking warfarin (13.0%) and 21 patients taking NOACs (9.2%) had the efficacy outcome, while 155 patients taking warfarin (6.6%) and 11 patients taking NOACs (4.8%) had the safety outcome. After adjustment for confounders, overall patients taking warfarin had significantly more secondary outcome than those taking NOACs (11.4% vs. 7.5%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.01–2.99; p = 0.045) regardless of SAMe-TT2R2 score.ConclusionsAF patients taking warfarin had a significantly higher CV death or IS/TIA/SE or MB compared to those taking NOACs regardless of SAMe-TT2R2 score. The results of this study do not support the use of SAMe-TT2R2 score to guide OAC selection.

Use of SAMe-TT2R2 in a racially diverse anticoagulation clinic: prediction of optimal anticoagulation.

The SAMe-TT2R2 score predicts optimal long-term oral Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation for homogenous Caucasian and homogenous Asian populations for non-valvular atrial fibrillation but at different score thresholds. The score that predicts optimal VKA anticoagulation in significantly diverse populations for multiple indications for systemic anticoagulation has not been reported. We determined whether optimal VKA anticoagulation is predicted by SAMe-TT2R2 score in a diverse inner-city population for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), unprovoked venous and pulmonary thromboembolic disease (VTE), mechanical prosthetic heart valves and all other indications. All patients on long term VKA's that attended an inner-city anticoagulation clinic between February 2016 and October 2017 were included in this study. Eligible patients were grouped according to oral anticoagulation indication: (1) NVAF, (2) VTE, (3) prosthetic valves and (4) other indications. Each patient's SAMe-TT2R2 score and percent time of INR in the therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated with optimal international normalized ratio (INR) control defined as TTR ≥ 65%. The correlation between SAMe-TT2R2 score and TTR was determined by logistic regression for each oral anticoagulant indication. Receiver operating characteristic curves were then used to identify the best cutoff for prediction of ≥ 65% TTR. Of 316 patients meeting study criteria, 54% were non-Caucasian and there was a significant negative correlation between the SAMe-TT2R2 score and TTR (coefficient - 0.35, P < 0.0001) for all patients. A SAMe-TT2R2 score < 4 was identified as the best threshold for predicting optimal TTR (Youden's J-statistics = 0.238) with accuracy and positive likelihood ratio of 63.4% and 1.73, respectively. The SAMe-TT2R2 score predicts optimal VKA anticoagulation for systemic anticoagulation for multiple indications in a diverse urban population at a higher score than the original report for non-valvular atrial fibrillation of a cohort where < 10% non-Caucasians.

The influence of clinical and genetic factors on the stability of warfarin’s anticoagulant effect in patients with atrial fibrillation

The aim. To investigate the influence of clinical and genetic factors on the stability of warfarin’s anticoagulant effect in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during the year. Materials and methods. The study involved 60 patients with AF, age 70.50 (64.25; 76.25) years (32 men and 28 women). Coagulogram indexes with International Normalized Ratio (INR) were determined using Coag Chrome 3003 monthly; the CHA2DS2-VASC, HAS-BLED, SAMe-TT2R2 scales scores were evaluated; the calculation of TTR was performed using the Rosendaal method. CYP2C9, CYP4F2, VKORC1 genes polymorphisms were determined using multiplex real time polymerase chain reaction in CFX-96 thermocycler (BioRad). Results. Median TTR in groups of patients with SAMe-TT2R2 score &lt;2 (n = 33) and ≥2 (n = 27) did not differ significantly (74 % versus 68 % respectively, P &gt; 0.05). There were significantly more patients with TTR &lt;70 % in the group with predicted labile INR (59.36 % versus 30.30 %; χ2 = 5.07, P &lt; 0.05). SAMe-TT2R2 score ≥2 increased the risk of poor INR control by 1.96 times (CI 1.05–3.63). No association of TTR with CYP2C9, CYP4F2 and VKORC1 gene polymorphisms was found. Episodes of excessive hypocoagulation (INR &gt;4) were detected in 21 (40 %) patients during the year. Excessive hypocoagulation was significantly more common in patients carrying the allele A of the VKORC1 gene in comparison with non-carriers (51.43 % versus 24.00 %; χ2 = 4.57, P &lt; 0.05). The presence of mutant allele A was associated with 2.14-fold higher risk of excessive hypocoagulation (RR = 2.14; CI 1.06–4.69). Taking amiodarone (χ2 = 3.13; P &lt; 0.05) had a significant effect on the development of excessive hypocoagulation with a relative risk RR = 1.83 (CI 1.01–3.35). Conclusions. SAMe-TT2R2 score can be useful to predict poor INR control, while VKORC1 genotype estimating – to predict excessive hypocoagulation episodes. An integrated approach using clinical and genetic methods is needed to determine the potential efficacy and safety of warfarin therapy.

Evaluation of ABC Bleeding Score and SAMe-TT2R2 Score on the Risk of Bleeding after Anticoagulation in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Complicated with Coronary Heart Disease.

Objective To explore the predictive value of ABC bleeding score and SAMe-TT2R2 score on the risk of bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated with coronary heart disease (CHD) after anticoagulation. Methods 149 patients with NVAF complicated with CHD were followed up in our hospital for one year. The bleeding events during the follow-up period were observed, the ABC bleeding score and SAMe-TT2R2 score were calculated, the predictive value of the two scoring methods for the main bleeding risk was analyzed by the ROC curve, and the AUC area under the ROC curve of the two scoring methods was compared by the Delong test. Results There were 32 bleeding events during the follow-up period. The AUC of ABC bleeding score and SAMe-TT2R2 score were 0.775 (P < 0.01) and 0.624 (P < 0.05), respectively. The Delong test showed that the AUC of ABC bleeding score was significantly higher than that of SAMe-TT2R2 score (d = 2.177, P < 0.05). Conclusion Both the ABC bleeding score and SAMe-TT2R2 score can predict the risk of bleeding after anticoagulation in patients with NVAF and CHD. The critical value of the SAMe-TT2R2 score for predicting bleeding events in patients with NVAF and CHD may need to be increased to 4 or 5, and the prediction ability of ABC bleeding score is significantly better than that of the SAMe-TT2R2 score.

Evaluation of the Modified SAMe-TT2R2 Score to Predict Good Anticoagulation Control with Warfarin Among non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Background: The SAMe-TT2 R2 Score was developed to identify vitamin K antagonists control outliers before non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients start treatment. SAMe-TT2 R2 Score was derived and validated using a primarily white Caucasian population to predict TTR. Given that non-Caucasian race already confers 2 points in this score, the SAMe-TT2 R2 score requires validation and/or re-calibration despite race of population. Method: We conducted a cohort retrospective study that included all non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who were on warfarin therapy from January to December 2019. Then we calculated the modified SAMe-TT2 R2 and SAMe-TT2 R2 for all study populations and we correlated the result with patients' TTR. The TTR was calculated through the Rosendaal's method. Results: We had 662 patient using warfarin therapy, among those 662, 60.9% were under cardiology and using it for cardiac indication, and only 18.1% diagnosed to have non-valvular AF. Modified SAMe-TT2 R2 score has good relation to original SAMe-TT2 R2 score as showed 75.71% (95% CI. 63.99 to 85.17%), 100% (95% CI. 92.89 to 100%) and 15% (95% CI. 3.21 to 77.95%); accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in relation to SAMe-TT2 R2 respectively. In addition to that in this small cohort we found that there is universal relationship between SAMe-TT2 R2 score, Modified SAMe-TT2 R2 score and TTR; TTR &gt;=65% associate with low score (&lt;2) of both SAMe-TT2 R2 , Modified SAMe-TT2 R2 score. Conclusion: The use of Modified SAMe-TT2 R2 score allows clinicians to make an informed decision on whether to start vitamin K antagonist or other non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant despite the race of the patients.

SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score for Prediction of Anticoagulation Control in Thai Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The quality of anticoagulation control is an important determination of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Previous trials have shown that SAMe-TT₂R₂ score could be used for prediction of anticoagulation control. Objective: To predict labile international normalized ratio (INR) by SAMe-TT₂R₂ score in Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Materials and Methods: The author retrospectively studied patients with non-valvularatrial fibrillation at Pranangklao Hospital between January 2019 and October 2020. Results: One hundred thirty patients were enrolled. The average ages of the patients were 67.5±10.2 years. The average SAMe-TT₂R₂ scores were 3.2±0.8 and the average CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.3±1.4. Most patients had hypertension and dyslipidemia. Most patients were prescribed betablockers. Most patients had time in therapeutic range (TTR) lower than 65. The present study has shown that patients with SAMe-TT₂R₂ score of 3 or more has also had high proportion of labile INR with statical significance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of different cut-offs of SAMe-TT₂R₂ score greater than 2 and SAMe-TT₂R₂ score when excluding race showed improvement of the sensitivity and specificity for prediction of labile INR. Conclusion: Labile INR was predicted by SAMe-TT₂R₂ score and the sensitivity and specificity increased in SAMe-TT₂R₂ score when excluding race. Keywords: SAMe-TT₂R₂ score; Non-valvular atrial fibrillation; Anticoagulation control

Factors predicting poor anticoagulant control on warfarin in a Thai population with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF): the ACAChE score

BackgroundIn many low- to middle-income countries in Asia, patients with NVAF usually received warfarin for thromboembolic prevention due to cost-effectiveness. The SAMe-TT2R2 score has been proposed to predict TTR in NVAF patients. However, the SAMe-TT2R2 score has not been much validated in Asian population. Interestingly, it may overestimate patients who had TTR < 65% due to regarding being Asians as a risk factor.ObjectivesTo determine the factors predicting poor anticoagulant control on warfarin, create new scoring system, and compare with the SAMe-TT2R2 score in a Thai population with NVAF.MethodsThis is a retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital. We enrolled NVAF patients who received warfarin from January 2014 to December 2018. TTR was calculated based on Rosendaal method. Multiple logistic regression and AUC-ROC curve were used for analysis.ResultsA total of 864 patients were enrolled with mean age of 73.6 ± 11.58 years. The mean TTR was 48.1 ± 25.2%. Using multivariate regression analysis, the predictive factors for TTR < 65% were antiplatelet use (OR 4.49, p ≤ 0.001), LVEF < 40% (OR 1.92, p = 0.037), chronic kidney disease (GFR < 50 ml/min/1.73 m2) (OR 1.68, p = 0.013), history of CHF (OR 1.7, p = 0.047), and age ≥ 75 years (OR 1.4, p = 0.037). Based on the regression coefficients, we developed the new scoring system called ACAChE score [A, antiplatelet use (4 points); C, chronic kidney disease, GFR < 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 (2 points); A, age ≥ 75 years (1 point); Ch, history of CHF (2 points); E, LVEF < 40% (2 points)]. ROC curve showed discrimination performance of the ACAChE score and SAMe-TT2R2 score for prediction of TTR < 65% with the C-statistic of 0.62 (95%CI 0.57–0.65) and 0.54 (95%CI 0.50–0.58), respectively.ConclusionIn Thai NVAF patients, the ACAChE score (antiplatelet use, chronic kidney disease (GFR < 50 ml/min/1.73 m2), age ≥ 75 years, history of congestive heart failure, and LVEF < 40%) has better prediction for TTR < 65% than SAMe-TT2R2 score. Thus, it expected to guide the selection of oral anticoagulation in Asian patients with NVAF.

Adherence to oral anticoagulation in ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation

Background Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have superior safety and comparable efficacy profile compared to vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs), with more convenient dosing schemes. However, issues with adherence to the NOACs remain unsolved. Aims We sought to investigate the adherence to oral anticoagulation (OAC) and baseline factors associated with poor adherence after ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods We recruited hospitalised patients (2013–2019) from two prospective stroke registries in Larissa and Helsinki University Hospitals and invited survived patients to participate in a telephone interview. We assessed adherence with the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) and defined poor adherence as a score of over 17. In addition to demographics, individual comorbidities, and stroke features, we assessed the association of CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores with poor adherence. Results Among 396 patients (median age 75.0 years, interquartile range [IQR] 70–80; 57% men; median time from ischaemic stroke to interview 21 months [IQR 12–33]; median ARMS score 17 [IQR 17–19]), 56% of warfarin users and 44% of NOAC users reported poor adherence. In the multivariable regression model adjusted for site, sex, and age, poor adherence was independently associated with tertiary education, absence of heart failure, smoking history, use of VKA prior to index stroke, and prior ischaemic stroke. CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores were not associated with poor adherence. Conclusions Adherence was poor in half of AF patients who survived an ischaemic stroke. Independent patient-related factors, rather than composite scores, were associated with poor adherence in these patients. KEY MESSAGES Adherence was poor in half of the atrial fibrillation patients who survived an ischaemic stroke. Independent patient-related factors rather than composite scores were associated with poor adherence. The findings support the importance of recognising adherence support as a crucial part of holistic patient care recommended by recent AF guideline.

A new index to predict quality of anticoagulation control in patients on vitamin K antagonists: the DAFNE score.

Aim: To derive a new clinical score to improve the prediction of those at risk of poor International Normalized Ratiocontrol among patients with atrial fibrillationtaking vitamin K antagonists. Materials & methods: The score was calculated using PAULA database and validated in the FANTASIIA population. Results: The DAFNE score (cardiovascular Disease, concomitant treatment with Amiodarone, Food/dietary transgressionand taking ≥7 pills daily, fEemale sex) score was related to a higher probability of poor International Normalized Ratio control. C-indexes were 0.611 and 0.576 (De Long test, p=0.007) for the DAFNE and SAMe-TT2R2 scores, respectively. Conclusion: The DAFNE score is a new clinical score which may potentially help determine those patients with atrial fibrillation who are at high risk of poor anticoagulation control with vitamin K antagonists.

Anticoagulant selection in relation to the SAMe-TT2R2 score in patients with atrial fibrillation: The GLORIA-AF registry

AimThe SAMe-TT2R2 score helps identify patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) likely to have poor anticoagulation control during anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and those with scores >2 might be better managed with a target-specific oral anticoagulant (NOAC). We hypothesized that in clinical practice, VKAs may be prescribed less frequently to patients with AF and SAMe-TT2R2 scores >2 than to patients with lower scores. Methods and resultsWe analyzed the Phase III dataset of the Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF), a large, global, prospective global registry of patients with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 stroke risk factor. We compared baseline clinical characteristics and antithrombotic prescriptions to determine the probability of the VKA prescription among anticoagulated patients with the baseline SAMe-TT2R2 score >2 and ≤ 2. Among 17,465 anticoagulated patients with AF, 4,828 (27.6%) patients were prescribed VKA and 12,637 (72.4%) patients an NOAC: 11,884 (68.0%) patients had SAMe-TT2R2 scores 0-2 and 5,581 (32.0%) patients had scores >2. The proportion of patients prescribed VKA was 28.0% among patients with SAMe-TT2R2 scores >2 and 27.5% in those with scores ≤2. ConclusionsThe lack of a clear association between the SAMe-TT2R2 score and anticoagulant selection may be attributed to the relative efficacy and safety profiles between NOACs and VKAs as well as to the absence of trial evidence that an SAMe-TT2R2-guided strategy for the selection of the type of anticoagulation in NVAF patients has an impact on clinical outcomes of efficacy and safety. The latter hypothesis is currently being tested in a randomized controlled trial. Clinical trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov//Unique identifier: NCT01937377, NCT01468701, and NCT01671007.

Evaluation of inter-patient variability in the pharmacodynamic indices of warfarin

ABSTRACT Objectives Warfarin exhibits huge inter-individual variability in therapeutic response. We assessed the extent and the factors affecting inter-individual variability in the anticoagulation control using pre-validated pharmacodynamic indices. Methods Patients receiving warfarin for at least 6 months were recruited. CHA₂DS₂-VASc, HASBLED, SAMe-TT2R2 scores, warfarin sensitive index (WSI), log-INR variability, and warfarin composite measure (WCM) were assessed. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline was adhered for assessing the anticoagulation control using time in therapeutic range (TTR) (TTR < 65%-poor; and TTR ≥ 65%-good). Odds ratio [95% confidence interval] was the effect estimate measure. Results Eighty-seven (39.5%) of the patients were poorly anticoagulated. Those with lower HASBLED [OR: 0.3; 0.1, 0.6] and SAMe-TT2R2 scores [OR: 0.2; 0.04, 0.7] and higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score [OR: 1.8; 1.1, 1.3] predicted good anticoagulation control. Thirty-five (15.9%) patients had high INR variability. Lower TTR, shorter duration of therapy, and higher WSI were observed in patients with high INR variability, and presence of drugs with potential interaction significantly predicted high INR variability. Conclusion Significant numbers of our patients on warfarin had poor anticoagulation control and high INR variability. We have identified duration of therapy, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, and WSI as reliable predictors for anticoagulation control and INR variability.

Quality of oral anticoagulation control in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a prospective controlled study

Objective The sex, age, medical history, treatment, tobacco use, race risk (SAMe-TT2R2) Score; the sex, age, medical history, treatment, tobacco use, genotype combination (SAMe-TT2G2) Score; and the so-called modified SAMe-TT2R2 scores have been proposed to predict the anticoagulation quality for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The data from a prospective controlled study is used to validate the SAMe-TT2R2 and SAMe-TT2G2 scores in Chinese NVAF patients treated with warfarin and to evaluate the association of factors with time in therapeutic range (TTR) to predict the quality of oral anticoagulation control. Methods A total of 379 patients with NVAF under warfarin treatment for a three-month follow-up were included in this prospective, multicenter study. The quality of oral anticoagulation control was evaluated by the TTR. The TTR was dichotomized for binary logistic regression analysis, using a cutoff point for classification as an inadequate (TTR < 65.0%) control. Results The 379 NVAF patients had a mean TTR of 58.35 ± 26.33% and median SAMe-TT2R2 and SAMe-TT2G2 scores of 3 and 2, respectively. The discrimination performances of the SAMe-TT2R2 and SAMe-TT2G2 scores for inadequate anticoagulation control (TTR < 65.0%) were poor (c-index < 0.60). The gene frequency of CYP2C9*3 was 3.2% and that of VKORC1-1639 G > A was 89.3%. Genetic variation of CYP2C9*3 and VKORC1-1639 G > A did not affect TTR after initial treatment. The condition TTR < 65.0% was associated with an age below 60 without genotype-guided warfarin dose initiation and concomitant torasemide. Conclusions A warfarin-dosing algorithm used for initial treatment of patients older than 60 helps to achieve a better quality of oral anticoagulation control, whereas concomitant torasemide can produce a negative effect. These findings provide useful information for future investigations on the quality of oral anticoagulation control in Chinese anticoagulation clinical practice.

Modified SAMe-TT2R2 score for predicting the therapeutic range of digoxin.

Digoxin treatment has come under scrutiny in recent years after reports from several studies that it is associated with increased mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The clinical effects of digoxin on mortality were closely related to serum digoxin concentrations (SDC) in these studies. In the present work, we evaluated the role of the SAMe-TT2R2 and modified SAMe-TT2R2 scores in predicting the therapeutic range of digoxin therapy. Medical records from our institution were screened for patients who were under digoxin treatment between 2008 and 2018. Atotal of 2418 patients for whom SDC were recorded were included in the study. An SDC of <0.5 or >1.2 ng/ml was defined as being out of the therapeutic range (oTR). In multivariable regression analyses, abnormal body mass index (odds ratio [OR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-1.95, p < 0.01), white blood cell count (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.27, p < 0.01), and the modified SAMe-TT2R2 score (OR: 4.19 95% CI: 3.71-4.72, p < 0.01) were determined to be independent predictors of oTR. Amodified SAMe-TT2R2 score greater than 3 predicted oTR with asensitivity of 86% and aspecificity of 65% (AUC: 0.825, p < 0.01). Digoxin is still widely used in the treatment of heart failure and AF despite concerns about the increased risk of mortality when levels are oTR. In the present study, the modified SAMe-TT2R2 score was found to be an independent predictor of oTR. This score may aid clinicians in identifying patients who are more likely to benefit from digoxin therapy.