Same-day Sputum Research Articles

Quality of Same-Day Sputum Smears Microscopy and Presumptive Tuberculosis Patients Drop-out at Health Facilities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Quality of Same-Day Sputum Smears Microscopy and Presumptive Tuberculosis Patients Drop-out at Health Facilities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Quality of Same-Day Sputum Smears Microscopy and Presumptive Tuberculosis Patients Drop-out at Health Facilities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

BackgroundSame-day sputum microcopy is recommended in areas where sputum smear microscopy external quality assessment (EQA) is effectively implemented and sturdy. In Addis Ababa, the status of EQA and drop-out of same-day sputum smear microcopy has not yet been assessed. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of same-day sputum smear microscopy and diagnostic drop-out of presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients in health facilities (HFs) across Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.MethodsAmulti-analysis was conducted from September 2016 to July 2017 to determine the status of external quality assessment and diagnostic drop-out of presumptive TB patients registered for same-day sputum smear microscopy. Data was coded and entered in Microsoft Excel, and subsequently transferred and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0.ResultsThe drop-out of same-day sputum smear microscopy was 209 (6.2%). More than 33% of the specimens collected for purposes of same-day sputum smears were of poor quality. Among the selected HFs for the study: 13 (46.4%) used filter reagents prior to sputum smear staining while 75% of the selected HFs for the study used smear microscopy services interruption in a year. The sensitivity and specificity of the HFs participating in regional quality assessment scheme for the diagnosis of TB was 97.4% and 99.6%, respectively.ConclusionThe diagnostic drop-out of same-day sputum smear microscopy was high in Addis Ababa. Strengthening EQA, competency-based laboratory professionals training on sputum smear microscopy might reduce the reading errors in sputum smear. Awareness creation of the community on the benefits gained from completion of specimen provision for the same-day approach decreases diagnostic drop-out and enhances TB control program.

Prospective study comparing the conventional and same-day strategies to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis

ObjectiveThe WHO recommends same-day sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) in countries with high TB burden for earlier diagnosis and treatment, a cornerstone to prevent air-borne transmission. We aimed to compare the conventional strategy (sputum collection on three consecutive days) and the same-day strategy (hour h, h+1, h+2) in France, a country with low TB burden. Patients and methodsOver a six-month period, all adult individuals presenting with presumptive smear-positive TB were eligible for the study, registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ID (NCT 02961569). Sputum specimens were collected three times the first day, then once on the second day and once on the third day. The concordance between the two strategies regarding smears and cultures were assessed. ResultsOf the 131 eligible individuals, 34 were given a TB treatment. Smears from hour h, h+1, h+2, day two and three were negative in 19 of these 34 patients. Positive smears were obtained in 15, 14, 15, 14, and 14 patients at hour h, h+1, h+2, on day two and three, respectively. Concordance regarding smear or culture was good, with Kappa 0.69 and 0.64, respectively. ConclusionThe same-day strategy seems to be a good alternative to the conventional strategy.

Sputum Smear Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnostic Dropout Rate in Public Health Facilities, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Background Prolonged laboratory diagnostic process of tuberculosis can lead to failure to complete the diagnosis and increase dropout rate of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) cases. This implies such dropout patients without completing diagnosis are critical as infected individuals remain untreated in the community, providing more opportunities for transmission of the disease and adversely affecting the epidemic. The aim of this research is to determine the level of smear positive PTB diagnosis dropout rate of spot-morning-spot sputum microscopy diagnosis method in public health facilities, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods Retrospective review of patient documents in 13 public health facilities' TB laboratory in Addis Ababa was conducted from October 2011 to March 2016. Data was computerized using Epi-info software and analysed using SPSS version 20.0 software. Descriptive numerical summaries were used to present the findings. Association between the dropout rate and demographic variables was assessed by Chi-square (X2). Bivariate model using Odds Ratio (OR) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated. P-Value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results Of 41,884 presumptive TB patients registered during the 53 months for laboratory investigation, 5.9% were positive for the first spot sputum smear microscopy. Among these positive cases, 142 (5.8%) and 298 (12.1%) did not come back to the laboratory to submitted early morning and second spot sputum specimens, respectively. The diagnostic dropout for morning sputum specimen in hospitals was 5.6% (58/1039) and in health centres was 5.9% (84/1424). However, higher proportion of dropout for second spot sputum specimen in hospitals was 16.4% (170/1039), compared to the health centres, 8.9% (128/1424). Diagnostic dropout of sputum smear microscopy had no significant association with sociodemographic variable (P value >0.05), while it had significant association with facility type (P value <0.05). Conclusion In this study smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis diagnostic dropout rate was high compared to WHO reported for the new strategy shift implying the importance of shifting to same-day approach. Hence, shifting from conventional to same day is crucial to minimize the TB diagnostic dropout rate in the study area and other similar settings. Further research is needed/recommended in the local setting to compare the yield and dropout rates between same-day and conventional sputum smear microscopy approach.

Same-day sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis – Light-emitting diode fluorescent staining with direct sputum versus Ziehl–Neelsen staining with concentration sputum

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the utility of fluorescent staining (FS) technique with direct sputum for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three sputum specimens (spot, second spot, and morning) were collected from the study participants. One smear was prepared from the direct sample and one using the N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide concentration method. The direct smears were stained using FS, and Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) staining was used to stain smears prepared after concentration method. Smear results were pooled and compared in two categories: standard spot-morning and same-day smears. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical difference in smear-positive cases. RESULTS: Among 2922 participants included in the study, smear positivity was, respectively, 10.5% and 10.2% for FS and ZN smears using spot-morning approach. Using the same-day approach, the smear positivity was, respectively, 10.4% and 9.9% for FS and ZN smears; statistically, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) between the staining techniques in both the approaches. CONCLUSION: More smear positivity is the advantage of using FS technique. Given this advantage, National TB Control Programs of high-TB-burden countries should consider installing light-emitting diode FS technique in peripheral settings also.

Same-day Smear Method Compared with Conventional Sputum Method for Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

BackgroundPatient compliance with the two-day Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme’s (RNTCP) diagnostic process for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is poor in high case load settings, with a high dropout rate observed on the second day. Hence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the same-day (spot-spot) sputum test for high-burden TB countries to help reduce diagnostic dropouts. This study addresses the paucity of comparative data on the accuracy and agreement of the two methods, while the WHO recommendations are yet to be implemented by the RNTCP. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the smear positivity rates of the same-day and conventional sputum examination methods for the diagnosis of sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB.MethodologyWe conducted a cross-sectional, analytical, nonrandomized comparative study on presumptive TB patients attending a designated microscopy center in a tertiary care hospital. Three sputum samples were collected: a first spot, a second spot (one hour after the first spot), and an early morning sample taken on the following day. The first and the second spot samples taken one hour apart were included for microscopic analysis. The conventional (i.e., two-day sputum) method used the first spot and the early morning sputum sample taken on the following day. A positive result from any one of the three sputum samples was recorded as a proven TB case. We then compared the results of the smear microscopy obtained by the two methods.ResultsThe same-day sputum microscopic method diagnosed 181 out of a total 189 TB cases. The conventional method diagnosed 188 cases. Thus, same-day sputum microscopy missed eight cases, whereas the conventional method missed only one case. The sputum positivity rate was 18.8% in the same-day sputum microscopy samples and 19.5% in the conventional method samples. The incremental yield of the second sputum sample in the same-day (second spot) sample was five cases (2.7%). In the conventional method (early morning sample), the yield was 12 cases (6.3%). The sensitivity of the same-day microscopy and conventional methods were 95.76% and 99.5%, respectively.ConclusionThe conventional method of diagnosing sputum-positive pulmonary TB had more sensitivity compared to the same-day sputum microscopy approach.

What a difference a day makes: Same-day vs. 2-day sputum smear microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis

What a difference a day makes: Same-day vs. 2-day sputum smear microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis

What a difference a day makes: same-day vs. 2-day sputum smear microscopy for diagnosing tuberculosis.

Setting: Nine district-level microscopy centres in Assam and Tripura, India. Objective: Same-day sputum microscopy is now recommended for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. We compared this method against the conventional 2-day approach in routine programmatic settings. Methods: During October-December 2012, all adult presumptive TB patients were requested to provide three sputum samples (one at the initial visit, the second 1 h after the first sample, and the third the next morning) for examination by Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy. Detection of acid-fast bacilli with any sample was diagnostic. The first and second spot sample comprised the same-day approach, and the first spot sample and next-day sample comprised the 2-day approach. Results: Of 2168 presumptive TB patients, 403 (18.6%) were smear-positive according to the same-day method compared to 427 (19.7%) by the 2-day method (McNemar's test, P < 0.001). Of the total 429 TB patients, 26 (6.1%) were missed by the same-day method and 2 (0.5%) by the 2-day method. Conclusion: Same-day specimen collection for microscopy missed more TB than 2-day collection. In India, missing cases by using same-day microscopy would translate into a considerable absolute number, hindering TB control efforts. We question the indiscriminate switch to same-day diagnosis in settings where patients reliably return for testing the next day.

Same-day sputum microscopy: The road ahead in tuberculosis diagnosis

Same-day sputum microscopy: The road ahead in tuberculosis diagnosis

Performance of Frontloading for Smear Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Referral Hospital in Uganda

ObjectiveTo compare the performance of frontloading and the standard WHO method for diagnosis of pulmonary TB at Mulago Hospital in order to validate the technique in this setting.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study in which 229 adult (≥18 years) TB suspects were consecutively enrolled. Suspects submitted three sputum samples as follows: at initial presentation, one hour after the first sample, and the next morning. The first and next morning samples formed the standard WHO method, while the first and the one hour later samples formed the frontloading method. Sample processing was by the standard N-acetyl L-cystein (NALC)-NaOH method, and fluorescent microscopy was done for both methods, while cultures of the first sample on Lowenstein-Jensen slants acted as a gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for the WHO standard and frontloading methods were compared.ResultsThe sensitivity of both the frontloading and standard schemes was 91.1% while their specificities were 86.2% and 91.7% respectively. There was excellent agreement between the diagnostic capacity of the two methods (kappa statistic = 0.87, P<0.0001). The positive predictive value for the frontloading scheme was 87.2% and that for the standard approach was 91.9%, while the negative predictive values were 90.4% and 90.9%, respectively. Among the HIV positive patients, frontloading identified 59/79 (74.7%) culture positive samples while the standard approach identified 55/79 (69.6%). In the HIV sero-negative category, on the other hand, front-loading identified 48/110 (43.6%) culture positive samples compared to 45/110 (40.9%) by the standard approach.ConclusionFrontloading based on smear examination of two same-day sputum samples has a similar performance to the current standard method and would not be associated with any significant missed diagnosis. It may therefore be advocated for use in our setting so as to reduce time to completion of diagnosis and patient loss to follow-up.

Test and Treat

Optimizing sputum smear microscopy, the principal method of tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in high-burden settings around the world, is a critical priority for global TB control. To improve rates of testing, completion, and reporting, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently endorsed a policy of same-day diagnosis of TB by microscopy. Unfortunately, the implementation of this policy has emphasized same-day sputum collection alone, with patients required to return on a subsequent day to collect results. We use a simple decision analysis to demonstrate that the timing of results reporting has a greater impact on treatment initiation for smear-positive TB cases than the timing of specimen collection. Same-day diagnosis of smear-positive TB, including sputum collection and reporting of smear results, should be the new global standard.

Does Bleach Processing Increase the Accuracy of Sputum Smear Microscopy for Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis?

Bleach digestion of sputum prior to smear preparation has been reported to increase the yield of microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis, even in high-HIV-prevalence settings. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of bleach microscopy, we updated a systematic review published in 2006 and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to rate the overall quality of the evidence. We searched multiple databases (as of January 2009) for primary studies in all languages comparing bleach and direct microscopy. We assessed study quality using a validated tool and heterogeneity by standard methods. We used hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) analysis to calculate summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy and random-effects meta-analysis to pool sensitivity and specificity differences. Of 14 studies (11 papers) included, 9 evaluated bleach centrifugation and 5 evaluated bleach sedimentation. Overall, examination of bleach-processed versus direct smears led to small increases in sensitivity (for bleach centrifugation, 6% [95% confidence interval [CI] = 3 to 10%, P = 0.001]; for bleach sedimentation, 9% [95% CI = 4 to 14%, P = 0.001]) and small decreases in specificity (for bleach centrifugation, -3% [95% CI = -4% to -1%, P = 0.004]; for bleach sedimentation, -2% [95% CI = -5% to 0%, P = 0.05]). Similarly, analysis of HSROC curves suggested little or no improvement in diagnostic accuracy. The quality of evidence was rated very low for both bleach centrifugation and bleach sedimentation. This updated systematic review suggests that the benefits of bleach processing are less than those described previously. Further research should focus on alternative approaches to optimizing smear microscopy, such as light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy and same-day sputum collection strategies.