Salvage Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Upfront multi-bipolar radiofrequency ablation for HCC in transplant-eligible cirrhotic patients with salvage transplantation in case of recurrence.

We aim to assess the long-term outcomes of percutaneous multi-bipolar radiofrequency (mbpRFA) as the first treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in transplant-eligible cirrhotic patients, followed by salvage transplantation for intrahepatic distant tumour recurrence or liver failure. We included transplant-eligible patients with cirrhosis and a first diagnosis of HCC within Milan criteria treated by upfront mbp RFA. Transplantability was defined by age <70 years, social support, absence of significant comorbidities, no active alcohol use and no recent extrahepatic cancer. Baseline variables were correlated with outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Among 435 patients with HCC, 172 were considered as transplantable with HCCs >2 cm (53%), uninodular (87%) and AFP >100 ng/mL (13%). Median overall survival was 87 months, with 75% of patients alive at 3 years, 61% at 5 years and 43% at 10 years. Age (p = .003) and MELD>10 (p = .01) were associated with the risk of death. Recurrence occurred in 118 patients within Milan criteria in 81% of cases. Local recurrence was observed in 24.5% of cases at 10 years and distant recurrence rates were observed in 69% at 10 years. After local recurrence, 69% of patients were still alive at 10 years. At the first tumour recurrence, 75 patients (65%) were considered transplantable. Forty-one patients underwent transplantation, mainly for distant intrahepatic tumour recurrence. The overall 5-year survival post-transplantation was 72%, with a tumour recurrence of 2.4%. Upfront multi-bipolar RFA for a first diagnosis of early HCC on cirrhosis coupled with salvage liver transplantation had a favourable intention-to-treat long-term prognosis, allowing for spare grafts.

Optimal treatment strategy and prognostic analysis of salvage liver transplantation for patients with earlyhepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy.

We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for salvage liver transplant in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy. This retrospective analysis included 53 patients who underwent salvage living-donor liver transplantation between January 2007 and January 2018. There were 24 and 29 patients in the early (recurrence ≤24months after primary liver resection) and the late recurrence groups, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression model, pre-liver transplant downstaging therapy, early recurrence (ER) after primary liver resection , and recurrence-to-liver-transplant ≥12months were independent risks to predict recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after salvage living-donor liver transplantation. Compared with the late recurrence group, the ER group showed lower disease-free survival rates (p<0.001); however, the overall survival rates did not differ between the two groups (p=0.355). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 83.3%, 70.6%, and 66.2%, and 96.0%, 91.6%, and 91.6% in the early and late recurrence groups, respectively. When stratified by recurrence-to-liver transplant time and pre-liver transplant downstaging therapy in the ER group, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were significantly different. ER after primary liver resection with advanced tumor status and a longer period of recurrence-to-liver-transplant (≥12months) have a negative impact on salvage liver transplant. Our findings provide novel recommendations for treatment strategies and eligibility for salvage liver transplant candidates.

A novel nomogram for prognosis stratification in salvage liver transplantation: a national-wide study with propensity score matching analysis in China.

Salvage liver transplantation (SLT) has been reported to be an efficient treatment option for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver resection (LR). However, for recipients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) due to recurrent HCC after LR in China, the selection criteria are not well established. In this study, data from the China Liver Transplant Registry (CLTR) of 4,244 LT performed from January 2015 to December 2019 were examined, including 3,498 primary liver transplantation (PLT) and 746 SLT recipients. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to minimize between-group imbalances. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between PLT and SLT in recipients fulfilling the Milan or Hangzhou criteria were compared based on the multivariate analysis, nomograms were plotted to further classify the SLT group into low- and high-risk groups. In this study, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and DFS of SLT recipients fulfilling Milan criteria (OS, P=0.01; DFS, P<0.001) or Hangzhou criteria (OS, P=0.03; DFS, P=0.003) were significantly reduced when compared to that of PLT group after PSM analysis. Independent risk factors, including preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, tumor maximum size and tumor total diameter were selected to draw a prognostic nomogram. The low-risk SLT recipients (1-year, 95.34%; 3-year, 84.26%; 5-year, 77.20%) showed a comparable OS with PLT recipients fulfilling Hangzhou criteria (P=0.107). An optimal nomogram model for prognosis stratification and clinical decision guidance of SLT was established. The low-risk SLT recipients based on the nomograms showed comparable survival with those fulfilling Hangzhou criteria in PLT group.

Primary versus Salvage Liver Transplantation after Curative-Intent Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be performed ab initio, primary liver transplantation (PLT), or for HCC recurrence after previous treatments such as liver resection (LR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA), salvage liver transplantation (SLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of SLT vs. PLT. For this, a retrospective study was carried out on patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC. The outcomes of PLT were compared with those of SLT. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and major postoperative complications. A sub-analysis of SLT-LR and SLT-RFA was also performed. In total, 141 patients were included: 96 underwent PLT and 45 SLT. Among the SLT group, 25 patients had undergone previous LR while 20 had had RFA. There were no differences in the major postoperative complications. Unadjusted DFS was significantly longer in the PLT group (p = 0.02), as were OS (p = 0.025) and CSS (p = 0.001). There was no difference in DFS between PLT and SLT-LR groups, while a significant difference was found between the PLT and SLT-RFA groups (p = 0.035). Nonetheless, DFS was no different between the SLT-LR and SLT-RFA groups. PLT appears to offer superior long-term oncological outcomes to SLT. Both SLT-LR and SLT-RFA offer acceptable OS and CSS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results, but the re-direction of grafts and transplant philosophy towards PLT rather than SLT may need to be considered.

Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Competing-risk Analysis of Tumor-related Death Following Liver Resection and Transplantation Under an Intention-to-treat Perspective.

Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma could benefit from upfront liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT), but the optimal strategy in terms of tumor-related outcomes is still debated. We compared the oncological outcomes of LR and LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, stratifying the study population into a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk class according to the risk of death at 5-y predicted by a previously developed prognostic model. The impact of tumor pathology on oncological outcomes of low- and intermediate-risk patients undergoing LR was investigated as a secondary outcome. We performed a retrospective multicentric cohort study involving 2640 patients consecutively treated by LR or LT from 4 tertiary hepatobiliary and transplant centers between 2005 and 2015, focusing on patients amenable to both treatments upfront. Tumor-related survival and overall survival were compared under an intention-to-treat perspective. We identified 468 LR and 579 LT candidates: 512 LT candidates underwent LT, whereas 68 (11.7%) dropped-out for tumor progression. Ninety-nine high-risk patients were selected from each treatment cohort after propensity score matching. Three and 5-y cumulative incidence of tumor-related death were 29.7% and 39.5% versus 17.2% and 18.3% for LR and LT group ( P = 0.039), respectively. Low-risk and intermediate-risk patients treated by LR and presenting satellite nodules and microvascular invasion had a significantly higher 5-y incidence of tumor-related death (29.2% versus 12.5%; P < 0.001). High-risk patients showed significantly better intention-to-treat tumor-related survival after upfront LT rather than LR. Cancer-specific survival of low- and intermediate-risk LR patients was significantly impaired by unfavorable pathology, suggesting the application of ab-initio salvage LT in such scenarios.

Prognosis of repeat hepatectomy for liver transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study with the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).

Factors affecting the prognosis of repeat hepatectomy for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after hepatectomy remain unclear. We aimed to clarify the prognostic factors for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy. We included 1758 primary and 486 repeat hepatectomies out of 2244 for HCC performed between 2006 and 2017 using the Hiroshima Study Group for Clinical Oncology and Surgery database. We first compared survival rates of primary and repeat hepatectomy patients. Subsequently, prognostic factors were analyzed in patients who underwent a repeat hepatectomy for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy (defined as age < 70years at the time of recurrence and recurrent tumor morphology that meets the Milan criteria). The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) after repeat hepatectomy was 63.2%, while the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) was 23.7%. RFS demonstrated significant inferiority in the repeat hepatectomy group than in the primary hepatectomy group; however, OS did not present a notable difference between the two cohorts. In the transplantable recurrence group, mALBI grade 2b, max tumor size > 20mm, and multiple tumors were independent prognostic risk factors for overall survival. Patients with two or more risk factors had a significantly lower survival rate (only 30.6% at 5years) compared to those with one or fewer risk factors (81.8% at 5 years). We identified the risk factors involved in post-hepatectomy survival for patients with transplantable recurrence after hepatectomy. The results are a potential indicator of whether salvage liver transplantation should be considered during repeat hepatectomy.

Microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma predicts microvascular invasion of its recurrence: potential implications for salvage liver transplantation?

Microvascular invasion (MVI) can only be assessed on a full surgical specimen. We aimed at evaluating, whether the histology of the primary tumor is predictive of MVI in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. Patients, who underwent liver resection or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for recurrent HCC from January 2001 until June 2018 were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Resected specimens were evaluated for HCC subtype/morphology, vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC)-pattern and MVI. Dichotomous parameters were analyzed using χ2-test and ϕ-values, with P values <0.05 being considered significant. Of 230 HCC recurrences, 37 (16.1%) underwent repeated liver resection (n=22) or OLT (n=15). Of these, 67.6% initially exceeded the Milan criteria. MVI correlated Milan criteria (P=0.005), tumor size (P=0.015) and VETC-pattern (P=0.034) in the primary specimen. The recurrences shared many features of the primary HCC such as tumor grade (P=0.002), VETC-pattern (P=0.035), and MVI (P=0.046). In recurrences, however, only the concordance with the Milan criteria correlated with MVI (P=0.018). No patient without MVI in the primary HCC revealed MVI on early recurrence (<2 years) (P=0.035). HCC recurrences share many biological features of the primary tumor. Moreover, early recurrences of MVI-negative HCC never revealed MVI. This finding offers novel concepts, e.g., patient selection for salvage OLT.

A262 NEONATAL ACUTE LIVER FAILURE DUE TO PRESUMED GESTATIONAL ALLOIMMUNE LIVER DISEASE - A CASE REPORT

Abstract Background Neonatal acute liver failure (NALF) is a rare disease that is distinct from acute liver failure seen in older children and adults. Gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD) is the most frequent cause, is initiated in utero by sensitization of the maternal immune system to a fetal hepatocyte antigen and subsequent production of maternal immunoglobulin G antibodies that cross the placenta. Maternal IgG binds to a fetal hepatocyte antigen and initiates an innate immune response involving the terminal complement cascade and membrane attach complex. The understanding of the alloimmune origin has led to the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment and exchange transfusion, significantly increasing survival. However, approximately 25% of patients may not respond and require salvage liver transplantation. In spite of an increased rate of comorbidities, concern for technical difficulties and limited graft availability, young infants eligible for transplant have been shown to have similar overall patient and graft survival rates compared to older children with other indications for liver transplant. Purpose The primary aim of our study is to report a case of NALF with successful liver transplant. Method We present the case of a preterm girl with NALF due to GALD refractory to medical management, requiring liver transplantation. Result(s) This is a 35-week preterm girl, with scant pre-natal care, birth weight of 1.825 kg and Apgar 9/9. She is the seventh child of non-consanguineous parents, with healthy siblings. On day-of-life (DOL) 1 she presented with acute kidney injury, progressive worsening metabolic acidosis and hyperammonemia and was found to be profoundly coagulopathic (INR 6), with normal liver enzymes and liver failure was diagnosed. Initial investigation ruled out congenital infections, sepsis, neonatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and metabolic diseases. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body demonstrated findings in keeping with iron deposition in the thyroid, liver and pancreas, suggestive of GALD. Completed double volume exchange transfusion and IVIG on DOL 9 and repeat IVIG on DOL 13 and 15, with partial improvement in INR. Due to persistent ascites, conjugated hyperbilirubinemia and hyperammonemia she was transferred for urgent liver transplant assessment. Persistent liver dysfunction in the form of hyperammonemia, hypoglycemia and progressive coagulopathy led to transplant listing on DOL 30. ABO incompatible deceased donor liver transplant was completed on DOL 62 (4.075 kg, estimated dry weight 3.5 kg). The procedure was uncomplicated, liver enzymes normalized, coagulopathy and hypoglycemia resolved. She was transferred to the ward on post-operative day (POD) 6. and weaned off sedatives and transitioned to oral feeds within 2 weeks of transplant, with complex abdominal wound closure on POD 29. Conclusion(s) Successful liver transplantation is possible in neonates with acute liver failure due to GALD refractory to medical management and weighing 4kg or less. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared MICROBIOME &amp; MICROBIAL THERAPY

Current status and prospect of treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Owing to its heterogeneous and highly aggressive nature, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate, which is a non-negligible problem despite the increasing number of available treatment options. Recent clinical trials have attempted to reduce the recurrence and develop innovative treatment options for patients with recurrent HCC. In the event of liver remnant recurrence, the currently available treatment options include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, tumor ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and combination therapy. In this review, we summarize the strategies to reduce the recurrence of high-risk tumors and aggressive therapies for recurrent HCC. Additionally, we discuss methods to prevent HCC recurrence and prognostic models constructed based on predictors of recurrence to develop an appropriate surveillance program.

TBS-Based Preoperative Score to Predict Non-transplantable Recurrence and Identify Candidates for Upfront Resection Versus Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Recurrence following liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be as high as 50-70%. While salvage liver transplantation may be feasible, patients may develop a non-transplantable recurrence (NTR) (recurrence beyond Milan criteria). We sought to identify preoperative risk factors to predict NTR after resection. Patients who underwent curative-intent LR for HCC were identified from a multi-institutional database. Preoperative factors associated with NTR were identified and a risk score model (NTR score) was developed and validated. Among 1620 patients, 842 (52.0%) developed recurrence; among patients with recurrence, NTR occurred in 341 (40.5%) with a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 30 months (24.7-35.3 months). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with NTR included alpha fetoprotein (AFP)>400ng/mL [hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-2.19], albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI) (referent low, medium ALBI: HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.10-1.81, high ALBI: HR 2.47, 95% CI 0.91-6.68), and tumor burden score (TBS) (referent low, high TBS: HR 2.55, 95% CI, 1.99-3.28). A simplified TBS-based NTR score was developed using the β-coefficients of each factor (C-index 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71). Higher NTR score was associated with incrementally worse 5-year RFS (low 44.8%, medium 37.5%, high 24.5%) [area under the curve (AUC) 0.59] and increased incidence of NTR (low 13.7%, medium 25.4%, high 38.2%) (AUC 0.65) (both p<0.001). Moreover, higher NTR score was associated with higher risk of extrahepatic recurrence (low 11.3%, medium 28.8%, high 37.5%) (p<0.001). NTR following curative-intent resection of HCC occurred in one in five patients. A simple TBS-based NTR score accurately predicted the risk of NTR and may help identify candidates for upfront resection versus transplantation.

Clinical efficacy and prognostic risk factors of salvage liver transplantation, rehepatectomy, and local ablation in the treatment of postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective: To investigate and analyze the clinical efficacy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT), rehepatectomy (RH), local ablation (LA), and prognostic risk factors in patients with postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: Clinical data of 145 patients with recurrent liver cancer in the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the People's Liberation Army from January 2005 to June 2018 were retrospectively collected. SLT group, RH group, and LA group included 25, 44, and 76 cases, respectively. Follow-up and statistics were recorded on the overall survival rate, relapse-free survival rate, and complications of the three groups of patients at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery. Univariate and multivariate COX analyses were used to analyze the prognostic risk factors in patients with recurrent HCC. Results: The overall survival rates of 1, 2, and 3 years following surgery in the SLT, RH, and LA groups were 100.0%, 84.0%, 72.0%, 95.5%, 77.3%, 65.9%, 90.8%, 76.3%, and 63.2%, respectively, when the recurrence of liver cancer met the Milan criteria. The overall survival rate did not differ statistically between SLT and RH (P = 0.303) or between RH and LA (P = 0.152). There were statistically significant differences in recurrence-free survival between SLT and RH or RH and LA (P = 0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between SLT and RH or RH and LA (P > 0.017). Age > 65 years was an independent risk factor affecting the overall survival rate in patients with recurrent HCC. Age > 65 years and recurrence time < 24 months were independent risk factors affecting the recurrence-free survival rate in patients with recurrent HCC. Conclusion: SLT is the best treatment option when the recurrence of HCC meets Milan's criteria. RH and LA are the appropriate treatment plans for recurrent HCC when the liver source is limited.

Surgical Strategies for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection: A Review of Current Evidence.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, and both liver resection and liver transplantation are considered potentially curative options. However, high recurrence rates affect the prognosis depending both on the primary HCC pathology characteristics or on the type and time of the relapse. While great attention has been usually posted on treatment algorithms for the first HCC, treatment algorithms for recurrent HCC (rHCC) are lacking. In these cases, surgery still represents a curative option with both redo hepatectomy and/or salvage liver transplantation, which are considered valid treatments in selected patients. In the current era of personalised medicine with promises of new systemic-targeted immuno-chemotherapies, we wished to perform a narrative review of the literature on the role of surgical strategies for rHCC.

Feasible management of median arcuate ligament syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation recipients.

BACKGROUNDIn orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients, median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is considered a risk factor for hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT), which is dreadful for OLT recipients. Different alternative surgical procedures have been proposed to overcome the impact of MALS on transplantation, but clinical evidence is still scarce. AIMTo evaluate the feasible surgical management of MALS to reduce complications in OLT patients.METHODSData for 288 consecutive patients who underwent OLT at The First Hospital of Jilin University between January 2017 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical management of median arcuate ligament (MAL) and modifications to the arterial anastomosis were recorded. The perioperative and long-term prognosis of MALS recipients were noted. Detailed preoperative and postoperative data of patients were analyzed in a descriptive manner.RESULTSEight patients with MALS were included in this study. The first patient with MALS received no intervention during the primary surgery and developed postoperative HAT. Salvage liver transplantation with MAL division was successfully performed. Gastroduodenal artery (GDA) preservation with splenic artery ligation was performed on three patients, only GDA preservation was performed on two patients, and no intervention was performed on two patients. No patient developed HAT after surgery and postoperative recovery was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONThe preservation of collateral circulation between the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk via the GDA with or without splenic artery ligation is a safe and feasible alternative to MAL division.

211.17: The Role of Liver Transplant in the Management of Hepatoblastoma Patients

Background: Hepatoblastoma (HB) is a rare malignancy. Liver resection (LR) and liver transplant (LT) are potential curative treatment, but the selection strategy for LT remains unclear. This study aimed to define the selection criteria between LR and LT. Method This was a retrospective study from 2 university centers. All patients with HB who received chemotherapy and surgical treatment from 2014 to 2020 were included. Patients who had unresectable disease after chemotherapy would be offered LT. Salvage LT would be considered if patients developed recurrence after LR. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for inferior event free survival (EFS) after LR and to determine the impact of such risk factors in the LT cohort. Results: One hundred and fifty-one HB patients were included; 133 (88.1%) patients had primary LR and 18 (11.9%) had primary LT. The flow chart of all study patients was presented in Figure 1. As LT was reserved for patients who had unresectable disease after chemotherapy, the POST-TEXT stage was more advanced in the primary LT group. (Table 1) Nonetheless, the overall survival (OS) and EFS were similar between primary LR and primary LT group. Figure 2a and 2b. In multivariable analysis among the LR group, 2 risk factors were associated with poor EFS: multifocality HR 3.294 95% CI (1.739-6.243), P <0.001 and rupture HR 3.772 95% CI (1.321-10.777), P=0.013. The LT group were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence of risk factors. The 5-year EFS after LT was 87.1% and 80.2%, in the absence and presence of risk factor respectively. (Figure 3) Fifteen patients underwent salvage LT and their outcomes were compared to patients who underwent primary LT. The OS and EFS were comparable. (Figure 4a and 4b). Conclusion: HB patients who had multifocal disease and rupture were associated with inferior EFS and LT should be considered. The outcomes of salvage LT were comparable to primary LT and it should be offered as a curative treatment in patients with recurrent HB.

Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patterns, Detection, Staging and Treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with the incidence of recurrence being as high as 88% even among patients who have undergone curative-intent treatment. Despite improvements in overall survival, recurrence remains a challenge necessitating accurate reappraisal of patient and disease status. To that end, accurate staging of recurrent HCC is a necessity to provide better care for these patients. Risk factors for poor survival after HCC recurrence have been identified and include characteristics of the primary disease, such as tumor multifocality, large size (≥5 cm), macroscopic vascular or microscopic lymphovascular invasion, preoperative a-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, R0 resection, and the presence of impaired liver function. Close surveillance with imaging is warranted following curative-intent therapy, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the preferred approach to identify small, early recurrent HCCs. Treatment decisions at the time of recurrence involve ruling out extrahepatic disease and identifying candidates for potentially curative-intent repeat treatment options. Patients with recurrent disease are, however, very diverse in terms of tumor morphology and biologic behavior, as well as residual hepatic functional reserve. Patients with preserved liver function may benefit from repeat liver resection or ablation. Patients with recurrence within the Milan criteria may even be candidates for salvage liver transplantation, while multimodality treatment with combination of liver-directed therapies appears to enhance oncologic outcomes for individuals with advanced recurrent disease. A “one-size-fits-all” approach in staging recurrent HCC does not exist. Rather, individualized and evidence-based decision-making is necessary in order to optimize outcomes for patients with recurrent HCC.

Salvage versus Primary Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Twenty-Year Experience Meta-Analysis.

Simple SummaryPrimary liver transplantation (PLT) for HCC represents the ideal treatment. However, since organ shortage increases the risk of drop-out from the waiting list for tumor progression, a new surgical strategy has been developed: Salvage Liver Transplantation (SLT) can be offered as an additional curative strategy for HCC recurrence after liver resection. The aim of this updated meta-analysis is to compare surgical and long-term outcomes of SLT versus PLT for HCC. The findings of our analysis reveal that SLT offers comparable surgical outcomes but slightly poorer oncological long-term outcomes with respect to PLT.(1) Background: Primary liver transplantation (PLT) for HCC represents the ideal treatment. However, since organ shortage increases the risk of drop-out from the waiting list for tumor progression, a new surgical strategy has been developed: Salvage Liver Transplantation (SLT) can be offered as an additional curative strategy for HCC recurrence after liver resection. The aim of this updated meta-analysis is to compare surgical and long-term outcomes of SLT versus PLT for HCC. (2) Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the published papers comparing SLT and PLT up to January 2022. (3) Results: 25 studies describing 11,275 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no statistical difference in intraoperative blood loss, overall vascular complications, retransplantation rate, and hospital stay in the SLT group compared with the PLT group. However, the SLT group showed a slightly significant lower 5-year OS rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate. (4) Conclusion: meta-analysis advocates the relative safety and feasibility of both Salvage LT and Primary LT strategies. Specifically, SLT seems to have comparable surgical outcomes but slightly poorer long-term survival than PLT.

The Effect of a Liver Transplant Program on the Outcomes of Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Multicenter Analysis.

To evaluate the effect of a liver transplantation (LT) program on the outcomes of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Surgical treatment of HCC includes both hepatic resection (HR) and LT. However, the presence of cirrhosis and the possibility of recurrence make the management of this disease complex and probably different according to the presence of a LT program. Patients undergoing HR for HCC between January 2005 and December 2019 were identified from a national database of HCC. The main study outcomes were major surgical complications according to the Comprehensive Complication Index, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), 90-day mortality, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes were salvage liver transplantation (SLT) and postrecurrence survival. A total of 3202 patients were included from 25 hospitals over the study period. Three of 25 (12%) had an LT program. The presence of an LT program within a center was associated with a reduced probability of PHLF (odds ratio=0.38) but not with overall survival and disease-free survival. There was an increased probability of SLT when HR was performed in a transplant hospital (odds ratio=12.05). Among transplant-eligible patients, those who underwent LT had a significantly longer postrecurrence survival. This study showed that the presence of a LT program was associated with decreased PHLF rates and an increased probability to receive SLT in case of recurrence.

Salvage Liver Transplant in the Treatment of a Child With Local Recurrence of Hepatoblastoma

Hepatoblastoma is the most common primary liver cancer of childhood, accounting for two-thirds of primary malignant hepatic neoplasms. Radical surgical removal combined with efficient chemotherapy is essential for cure. Despite a complete tumor resection, hepatoblastoma may recur as isolated local disease. Intrahepatic recurrence of hepatoblastoma after liver resection is among the indications for liver transplant. Here, we present a patient who underwent salvage liver transplant for the treatment of local recurrence of hepatoblastoma. A 13-year-old boy who was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma arising from the left liver lobe and who had been treated with surgical resection was admitted to our outpatient oncology clinic for further evaluation because alpha-fetoprotein levels had started to increase after surgery. Histopathological reexamination of hemihepatectomy material showed a histological aspect of an epithelial hepatoblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multifocal lesions in the right liver lobe compatible with local recurrence. Despite a favorable initial response to chemotherapy, the tumor showed progression with increased alpha-fetoprotein levels. The patient was deemed a viable candidate for an urgent liver transplant and underwent right lobe living donor liver transplant. He had excellent graft function without any complications or signs of malignancy in the last follow-up visit at 7 months posttransplant. Salvage liver transplant is a lifesaving and sometimes the only treatment option for patients with local recurrence of hepatoblastoma. Although transplant in the salvage setting has been associated with worse outcomes than primary transplant, recent data have indicated more favorable and acceptable outcomes. Further studies are warranted to better understand the role of salvage liver transplant in the treatment of hepatoblastoma. Early consultation with the liver transplant team is critical in children who are most likely to need extreme resection or liver transplant.

Liver-Directed Treatment Options Following Liver Tumor Recurrence: A Review of the Literature.

Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.

Primary vs. salvage liver transplantation for biliary atresia: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionKasai hepatoportoenterostomy is the standard of care for children with biliary atresia, but a majority of patients progress to end-stage liver disease and require a salvage liver transplant. Given the high failure rates of the hepatoportoenterostomy operation, some have advocated for primary liver transplantation as a superior treatment approach. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of pediatric candidates with biliary atresia listed for primary vs. salvage liver transplantation. MethodsThe SRTR/OPTN database was retrospectively reviewed for all children with biliary atresia listed for liver transplant between March 2002 and February 2021. Candidates were categorized as primary liver transplant if they had not undergone previous abdominal surgery prior to listing and salvage liver transplant if they had. Salvage transplants were further categorized as early failure if listed within the first year of life or late failure if listed at an older age. Results3438 children with biliary atresia were listed for transplant during the study period, with 15% of them listed for a primary transplant, 17% for salvage transplant after early failure, and 67% after late failure. Recipients of salvage liver transplant with late failure had lower bilirubin levels and were less critically ill as demonstrated by MELD/PELD scores and hospitalization status. Correspondingly, these recipients had higher waiting list and graft survival, though this did not remain statistically significant after adjustment in multivariable models. There were no differences in waiting list, recipient, or graft survival with primary vs. salvage liver transplant after early failure. ConclusionKasai hepatoportoenterostomy should remain the standard of care in biliary atresia as it may delay need for transplant beyond the first year of life in a subset of recipients and does not jeopardize subsequent transplant outcomes, even with early failure. Levels of evidenceRetrospective cohort study (Level III)