Viral Load In Saliva Research Articles

Quantitative analysis of HSV‑1 shedding as a predictor of cerebral vasospasm severity in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a critical determinant of outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Despite advances in neurocritical care, modifiable risk factors for CV remain poorly understood, and identifying them could significantly enhance patient management and treatment strategies. The present study explored the potential link between the reactivation of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), a common resident virus in cranial nerves, and CV severity. It was hypothesized that higher HSV-1 viral load in saliva may be associated with increased CV severity. Saliva samples were collected on days 4, 7, 10 and 14 post-aSAH, and HSV-1 DNA levels were measured using quantitative PCR. CV severity was assessed using the Lindegaard ratio (LR), with an LR >3 considered the diagnostic threshold for CV. A total of 36 patients were enrolled, and 139 saliva samples were collected. HSV-1 DNA was detected in 19.4% of samples (27/139), and 44% of patients (16/36) developed CV. HSV-1 seropositive patients made up 88.9% (32/36) of the cohort, with 50% exhibiting viral shedding during the study period. None of the HSV-1 seronegative patients (11.1%, 4/36) exhibited viral shedding or developed CV. Regression analysis showed a positive association between HSV-1 viral load and CV severity, with viral load explaining 27.8% of the variability (P=0.005). Age was also significant, with older patients experiencing less severe CV (P<0.001). Supervised machine learning identified viral load thresholds that aligned with standard LR values for moderate and severe CV. While the small sample size and observational design limit the generalizability of the results, these findings suggested that earlier detection and intervention for CV could be informed by assessing HSV-1 serostatus and monitoring viral activity through saliva samples or other non-invasive methods, highlighting the need for larger, controlled studies to validate these results.

Feasibility, performances and predictive value of congenital CMV neonatal screening on saliva swabs

BackgroundEarly diagnosis of congenital CMV infection (cCMVI) allows for early intervention and follow-up to detect delayed hearing loss. While CMV PCR in urine is the gold standard for cCMVI diagnosis, saliva testing is often performed. ObjectivesOur aim was to determine (i) if swab saliva sampling needed standardization, (ii) if a threshold value in “virus copies per million cells (Mc)” in saliva samples could improve clinical specificity, and (iii) to establish a correlation between viral load in saliva and symptomatology/outcome of cCMVI. Materials and methodsIn our institution, universal newborn screening is performed on saliva swabs at delivery or until day 3 of life. If positive, CMV PCR in urine is done within 2 weeks to confirm or exclude cCMVI. ResultsCell quantification showed that saliva swab sampling was well performed as 95.4 % samples had more than 100 cells/10 µL. There was a good correlation between saliva viral load in copies/mL and in copies/Mc (Pearson's r = 0.96, p < 0.0001). However, threshold values, established to determine a viral load level at which we could confidently identify infected newborns, did not improve positive predictive value (21.8 % for copies/mL and 21 % for copies/Mc vs 25.4 % without threshold) but instead reduced sensitivity (88 % and 85% vs 100 % without threshold). Samples collected on day 2 or 3 had better positive predictive value (38.7 %) compared to those collected on day 1 (23.8 %). Symptomatology at birth was not significantly associated with viral load in saliva at diagnosis. However, sequelae occurrence was associated with viral load in saliva (copies/Mc). DiscussionOur results confirm that saliva swab is a suitable sample for universal neonatal screening. However, identifying newborns that will develop sequelae remains an issue in the management of cCMVI.

Effectiveness of mouth antiseptics in reducing the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 load in saliva? A systematic review of clinical trials

This systematic review assessed the effect of mouthwashes on reducing the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the saliva of infected patients. Fifteen electronic databases were searched using the terms "Mouthwash", "Viral Load", and "COVID-19". Only clinical trials were considered, with no language or publication year restrictions. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane tool (Rob 2.0) for randomized clinical trials and non-randomized trials (ROBINS-I). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. After the search, 1,102 references were identified and assessed for eligibility criteria. Among these, 34 were selected, and after a thorough analysis, only six were included. The mouthwashes evaluated included 1% hydrogen peroxide, iodopovidone, cetylpyridinium chloride, and chlorhexidine. The results indicated that iodopovidone, chlorhexidine, and cetylpyridinium chloride performed better compared to other options. In conclusion, the use of mouthwashes appears to be effective in reducing the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva.

Submandibular Gland Pathogenesis Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Implications for Xerostomia.

Although SARS-CoV-2 induces mucin hypersecretion in the respiratory tract, hyposalivation/xerostomia has been reported by COVID-19 patients. We evaluate the submandibular gland (SMGs) pathogenesis in SARS-CoV-2-infected K18-hACE2 mice, focusing on the impact of infection on the mucin production and structural integrity of acini, ductal system, myoepithelial cells (MECs) and telocytes. The spike protein, the nucleocapsid protein, hACE2, actin, EGF, TNF-α and IL-1β were detected by immunofluorescence, and the Egfr and Muc5b expression was evaluated. In the infected animals, significant acinar hypertrophy was observed in contrast to ductal atrophy. Nucleocapsid proteins and/or viral particles were detected in the SMG cells, mainly in the nuclear membrane-derived vesicles, confirming the nuclear role in the viral formation. The acinar cells showed intense TNF-α and IL-1β immunoexpression, and the EGF-EGFR signaling increased, together with Muc5b upregulation. This finding explains mucin hypersecretion and acinar hypertrophy, which compress the ducts. Dying MECs and actin reduction were also observed, indicating failure of contraction and acinar support, favoring acinar hypertrophy. Viral assembly was found in the dying telocytes, pointing to these intercommunicating cells as viral transmitters in SMGs. Therefore, EGF-EGFR-induced mucin hypersecretion was triggered by SARS-CoV-2 in acinar cells, likely mediated by cytokines. The damage to telocytes and MECs may have favored the acinar hypertrophy, leading to ductal obstruction, explaining xerostomia in COVID-19 patients. Thus, acinar cells, telocytes and MECs may be viral targets, which favor replication and cell-to-cell viral transmission in the SMG, corroborating the high viral load in saliva of infected individuals.

Establishing correlates of maternal-fetal cytomegalovirus transmission-one step closer through predictive modeling.

Determinants of maternal-fetal cytomegalovirus (CMV) transmission and factors influencing the severity of congenital CMV (cCMV) infection are not well understood. We conducted a descriptive, multi-center study in pregnant women ≥18 years old with primary CMV infection and their newborns (NCT01251744) to explore maternal immune responses to CMV and determine potential immunologic/virologic correlates of cCMV following primary infection during pregnancy. We developed alternative approaches looking into univariate/multivariate factors associated with cCMV, including a participant clustering/stratification approach and an interpretable predictive model-based approach using trained decision trees for risk prediction (post-hoc analyses). Pregnant women were grouped in three distinct clusters with similar baseline characteristics, particularly gestational age at diagnosis. We observed a trend for higher viral loads in urine and saliva samples from mothers of infants with cCMV versus without cCMV. When using a trained predictive-model approach that accounts for interaction effects between variables, anti-pentamer IgG antibody concentration and viral load in saliva were identified as biomarkers jointly associated with the risk of maternal-fetal CMV transmission. We identified biomarkers of CMV maternal-fetal transmission. After validation in larger studies, our findings will guide the management of primary infection during pregnancy and the development of vaccines against cCMV.

SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in saliva samples: Usefulness and limitations

Saliva samples are important for diagnosis, because they are noninvasive and easy to acquire. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the value saliva samples have in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in comparison to nasal swabs and a new system named CovidCheck. A standard methodology identified the virus in 185 nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples revealing a sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 82,100,100 and 94.67%, respectively for saliva samples. Viral presence in saliva samples with the standard methodology in comparison to the CovidCheck system was evaluated in 67 samples with sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 68, 81, 68 and 81%, respectively. In conclusion, our results highlight the usefulness saliva samples have in detecting respiratory viral infections. However, presence of viral inhibitors and viral load in saliva, and the patient's clinical status should be considered as they might affect amplifying systems results.

Oral Valganciclovir Initiated Beyond 1 Month of Age as Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss Caused by Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectiveTo determine if valganciclovir initiated after 1 month of age improves congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV(-associated sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Study designWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir at United States (n=12) and United Kingdom (n=9) sites. Patients ages1 month through 3 years with baseline SNHL were enrolled. The primary outcome was change in total ear hearing between baseline and study month 6. Secondary outcome measures included change in best ear hearing and reduction in CMV viral load in blood, saliva, and urine. ResultsOf 54 participants enrolled, 35 were documented to have cCMV infection and were randomized (active group: 17; placebo group: 18). Mean age at enrollment was 17.8 ± 15.8 months (valganciclovir) versus 19.5 ± 13.1 months (placebo). Twenty (76.9%) of the 26 ears from subjects in the active treatment group did not have worsening of hearing, compared with 27 (96.4%) of 28 ears from subjects in the placebo group (p= 0.09). All other comparisons of total ear or best ear hearing outcomes were also not statistically significant. Saliva and urine viral loads decreased significantly in the valganciclovir group but did not correlate with change in hearing outcome. ConclusionsIn this randomized controlled trial, initiation of antiviral therapy beyond the first month of age did not improve hearing outcomes in children with cCMV-associated SNHL.

Insights into estrogen impact in oral health & microbiome in COVID-19

BackgroundCOVID-19 emerged in late 2019 and has occasioned more than 765 millions cumulative cases and 6.9 millions of deaths globally. Notably, around 70% of patients with severe COVID-19 are men. Therefore, it is to be presumed that women have a hormonal protector factor in inflammation and ACE2 expression. On the other hand, oral health status, and local microbiome can be key factors to respiratory viral infections control. Nevertheless, it has been poorly investigated. In our study 20 premenopausal, 18 postmenopausal and 22 men with COVID-19 were included. Oral health status, viral load, lingual ACE2 expression, as well as microbiome, estrogens and cytokines in saliva were analyzed.ResultsOur results showed a lower expression of ACE2 in tongue cells of postmenopausal compared with premenopausal (p = 0.05), and a strong negative correlation between saliva estrogen and viral load (r = -0.76; p = 0.001). Respect to IFN-γ (p = 0.05), IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-18, and IL-23 levels were increased in postmenopausal. Oral microbiome signature of premenopausal was characterized by Prevotella melaninogenica (Log2 = 26.68; p = 1.34e-10), Haemophilus (Log2 = 23.99; p = 2.96e-9), and Alloprevotella (Log2 = 7.92; p = 0.0001). On the other hand, Leptotrichia (Log2 = -18.74; p = 0.001), Tanerella (Log2 = -17.08; p = 0.004), and Clostridiales (Log2 = -2.88; p = 0.04) represented the poor oral health group compared with the adequate group which was enriched with the commensal microorganism Neisseria perflava (Log2 = 26.70; p = 1.74e-7). Furthermore, the high viral load group was characterized by Prevotella nanceiensis (Log2 = 19.60; p = 6.06e-8), Prevotella melaninogenica (Log2 = 21.45; p = 9.59e-6), Alloprevotella (Log2 = 23.50; p = 2.70e-7) and bacteria from the red complex Porphyromonas endodentalis (Log2 = 21.97; p = 1.38e-7).ConclusionsPostmenopausal and men have a poor oral health status which could be related to a detrimental progression of COVID-19 also linked to a lower expression of ACE2, lower saliva estrogen levels and oral dysbiosis. Nevertheless, functional studies are required for a deeper knowledge.

Oral Manifestations in COVID-19-positive Patients: A Clinical Case Series

Abstract The development of oral lesions in COVID-19 patients can be attributed to a variety of factors. High viral load in saliva, the virus directly targeting the mucosa, association with dermal manifestations, use of corticosteroids, long hospital stay, intubation, and hospital-acquired infections are few possible causes. Evidence suggests that ACE2 receptors in salivary ducts, tongue, and other oral tissues have a high affinity for SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to understand the different lesions that are most frequently seen in COVID-19 patients for proper management. In the present study, eight cases of oral manifestations in COVID-19 patients have been discussed along with their management. Tongue was found to be one of the most common sites due to the abundance of ACE2 receptors. Pigmentation, depapillation, hyperplastic papillae, benign migratory glossitis, and fungal overgrowth were noted on the tongue. Xerostomia, pigmentation, and fungal infection of oral mucosal surfaces, as well as oral ulceration, were other lesions.

Longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in self-collected saliva from health care workers during breakthrough infections to spare working days.

Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) has been used as the standard method for detecting and monitoring SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic. However, NPS collection often causes discomfort and poses a higher risk of transmission to health care workers (HCW). Furthermore, RT-qPCR only provides relative quantification and does not allow distinguishing those samples with residual, no longer active infection, whereas droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) allows for precise quantification of viral load, offering greater sensitivity and reproducibility. This study highlights the effectiveness of using self-collected saliva as a convenient and reliable sampling method. By utilizing ddPCR to measure the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva samples, individuals with low or undetectable viral loads can be quickly identified. This approach is particularly advantageous for surveillance programs targeting HCW, as it enables the early identification and release of uninfected personnel, minimizing lost workdays. Additionally, analyzing viral load in saliva samples by ddPCR is valuable in determining virus shedding duration across different SARS-CoV-2 variants, informing transmission and disease control. Finally, testing saliva could overcome the detection of historic cases due to prolonged RNA swabbing past-infection and the unnecessary exclusion of those individuals from the workplace.

Effect of 1% H2O2 on Three Salivary Stress Biomarkers, Cortisol, Alpha-Amylase, and sIgA

BackgroundDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, several associations worldwide have been recommending the use of 1% hydrogen peroxide solution as a preprocedural mouth rinse before dental treatments to reduce viral load in saliva. This protocol is also employed in stress studies, especially in the context of dental treatment that uses salivary biomarkers as an indicator. However, the effect of 1% hydrogen peroxide as mouth rinse on salivary biomarkers remains unclear. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the effects of 1% hydrogen peroxide solution as a preprocedural mouth rinse on 3 salivary stress biomarkers—salivary cortisol, salivary secretory IgA, and salivary α-amylase—both on chemical influence and mechanical irrigation. Materials and methodsNinety healthy participants with confirmed negative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction results for COVID-19 at most 2 days prior to the experiment were included in this study. All participants were randomly allocated into 3 groups: experimental (1% hydrogen peroxide solution), positive control (distilled water), and negative control (no mouth rinse). Saliva samples were collected before and after mouth rinsing with the respective solutions. Salivary biomarkers were analysed using specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. ResultsSalivary cortisol and salivary α-amylase did not significantly differ before and after rinsing, whilst salivary sIgA levels decreased in all 3 groups. Nonetheless, there were no significant differences in the changes of these biomarkers across the 3 groups. ConclusionsThis study shows that using 1% hydrogen peroxide solution as a preprocedural mouth rinse for universal precaution does not alter the levels of these 3 salivary biomarkers.

Antiviral Effect of Candies Containing Persimmon-Derived Tannin against SARS-CoV-2 Delta Strain.

Inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the mouth has the potential to reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), due to the virus being readily transmitted by dispersed saliva. Persimmon-derived tannin has strong antioxidant and antimicrobial activity owing to its strong adhesion to proteins, and it also exhibited antiviral effects against non-variant and Alpha-variant SARS-CoV-2 in our previous study. In this study, we first demonstrated the antiviral effects of persimmon-derived tannin against the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro via the plaque assay method. We then examined the effects of candy containing persimmon-derived tannin. Remarkably, the saliva samples provided by healthy volunteers while they were eating tannin-containing candy showed that the virus titers of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant were suppressed. In addition, we found that the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva from patients with COVID-19 collected immediately after they had eaten the tannin-containing candy was below the level of detection via PCR for SARS-CoV-2. These data suggest that adding persimmon-derived tannin to candy and holding such candy in the mouth is an effective method for inactivating SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, and the application of this approach shows potential for inhibiting the transmission of COVID-19.

A Mouthwash with Cetylpyridinium Chloride Is Reducing Salivary SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in +COVID-19.

Aim: The aim of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial is to evaluate the capacity of a mouthwash to reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the saliva of patients with COVID-19. Methods: Twenty-three symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive outpatients were selected and randomised into two groups and registered at NTC 04563689. Both groups rinsed and gargled for one minute with either distilled water (Placebo) or with 0.05% Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) plus 0.12% Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash (PERIOAID Intensive CareÒ). Saliva samples were collected before the use of placebo or mouthwash and after 15 minutes and 1 and 2 hours of either of the above treatment. A saliva sample was also taken five days after regular use of placebo or mouthwash twice daily. The virus was detected by qRT-PCR. Results: A great heterogeneity in the viral load values was observed at baseline in both groups for nasopharyngeal and saliva samples. Most of the patients who used the mouthwash (8/12) had a significant decrease in baseline viral load after 15 min (greater than 99% reduction). This inhibitory effect was maintained for up to two hours in 10 of the 12 patients. At five days, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in only 1 patient from the mouthwash group and in 5 from the placebo group. Conclusions: This study points out that a CPC mouthwash can reduce the viral load in saliva of COVID-positive patients. This finding may be important in transmission control of SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of CPC mouthwash-reduction on SARS-CoV-2 shedding in saliva requires further study

Rapid detection of intact SARS-CoV-2 using designer DNA Nets and a pocket-size smartphone-linked fluorimeter.

Rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive point-of-care diagnosis is vital to controlling highly infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Here, we report the design and characterization of a compact fluorimeter called a "Virus Pod" (V-Pod) that enables sensitive self-testing of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva. The rechargeable battery-operated device reads the fluorescence generated by Designer DNA Nanostructures (DDN) when they specifically interact with intact SARS-CoV-2 virions. DDNs are net-shaped self-assembling nucleic acid constructs that provide an array of highly specific aptamer-fluorescent quencher duplexes located at precise positions that match the pattern of spike proteins. The room-temperature assay is performed by mixing the test sample with DNA Net sensor in a conventional PCR tube and placing the tube into the V-Pod. Fluorescent signals are generated when multivalent aptamer-spike binding releases fluorescent quenchers, resulting in rapid (5-min) generation of dose-dependent output. The V-Pod instrument performs laser excitation, fluorescence intensity quantitation, and secure transmission of data to an App via Bluetooth™. We show that the V-Pod and DNA Net assay achieves clinically relevant detection limits of 3.92×103 viral-genome-copies/mL for pseudo-typed wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and 1.84×104, 9.69×104, 6.99×104 viral-genome-copies/mL for pathogenic Delta, Omicron, and D614G variants, representing sensitivity similar to laboratory-based PCR. The pocket-sized instrument (∼$294), inexpensive reagent-cost/test ($1.26), single-step, rapid sample-to-answer, and quantitative output represent a capability that is compatible with the needs of frequent self-testing in a consumer-friendly format that can link with medical service systems such as healthcare providers, contact tracing, and infectious disease reporting.

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Saliva and Other Respiratory Tract Samples of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Patients with COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants continue to emerge during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Contrasting studies on the omicron variant have demonstrated higher viral loads in different clinical specimens, which is consistent with its high transmissibility. We investigated the viral load in clinical specimens that were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, delta, and omicron variants, and we analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of upper and lower respiratory specimens for these variants. We performed nested reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), targeting the spike gene and sequencing for variant classification. RT-PCR was performed using upper and lower respiratory specimens, including saliva from 78 COVID-19 patients (wild-type, delta, and omicron variants). A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values from the N gene, showed that the omicron variant saliva samples had a higher sensitivity (AUC = 1.000) than did the delta (AUC = 0.875) and the wild-type (AUC = 0.878) variant samples. The sensitivity of the omicron saliva samples was greater than that of the wild-type nasopharynx and sputum samples (P < 0.001). The viral loads of the saliva samples containing the wild-type, delta, and omicron variants were 8.18 × 105, 2.77 × 106, and 5.69 × 105, respectively, which did not differ significantly (P = 0.610). Statistically significant differences were not observed in the saliva viral loads between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients who were infected with the omicron variant (P = 0.120). In conclusion, omicron saliva samples had higher sensitivity than did wild-type and delta samples, and the viral load did not significantly differ between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the sensitivity differences. IMPORTANCE Owing to the vast heterogeneity of the studies focused on the correlation between the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant and COVID-19, accurate comparisons of the specificity and sensitivity of samples and associated outcomes are still inconclusive. Moreover, limited information is available on the leading causes of infection and the factors that are associated with the conditions that underlie the spread of infection. Although several studies have contributed important knowledge regarding infectious specimens, the impact of saliva samples remains unknown. This study showed that the sensitivity of the omicron variant saliva samples was higher than that of the wild-type nasopharyngeal and sputum samples. Moreover, neither vaccinated nor nonvaccinated patients who were infected with the omicron variant showed any significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 viral loads. Hence, this study is an important step toward understanding how saliva sample results are correlated with other specimen results, regardless of the vaccination status of patients who are infected with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant.

Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva: Implications for late-stage diagnosis and infectious duration.

Saliva has been a COVID-19 diagnostic specimen of interest due to its simple collection, scalability, and yield. Yet COVID-19 testing and estimates of the infectious period remain largely based on nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs. We sought to evaluate whether saliva testing captured prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 and potential infectiousness later in the disease course. We conducted an observational study of symptomatic COVID-19 patients at University Hospital in Newark, NJ. Paired saliva and nasal specimens from 96 patients were analyzed, including longitudinal analysis of paired observations from 28 of these patients who had multiple time-points. Saliva detected significantly more cases of COVID-19 beyond 5 days (86.1% [99/115] saliva vs 48.7% [56/115] nasal, p-value < 0.001), 9 days (79.4% [50/63] saliva vs 36.5% [23/63] nasal, p-value < 0.001) and 14 days (71.4% [20/28] saliva vs 32.1% [9/28] nasal, p-value = 0.010) of symptoms. Additionally, saliva yielded lower cycle thresholds across all time periods, indicative of higher viral loads in saliva. In the longitudinal analysis, a log-rank analysis indicated that the survival curve for saliva was significantly different from the curve for nasal swabs (p<0.001) with a median survival time for saliva of 18 days compared to 13 days for nasal swabs. We additionally performed saliva viral cultures among a similar COVID-19 patient cohort and noted patients with positive saliva viral cultures between 7 to 28 days of symptoms. Findings from this study suggest that SARS-CoV-2 RNA persists longer and in higher abundance in saliva compared to nasal swabs, with potential of prolonged propagating virus. Testing saliva may thus increase yield for detecting potentially infectious virus even beyond the first five days of symptomatic COVID-19.

Urine and Saliva Viral Load in Children with Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.

Viral load in infant saliva and urine was assessed to predict sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Viral load was higher in symptomatic infants. Viral load in asymptomatic children with and without SNHL did not differ. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection viral load in urine and saliva does not predict hearing loss.

Extreme differences in SARS-CoV-2 viral loads among respiratory specimen types during presumed pre-infectious and infectious periods.

SARS-CoV-2 viral-load measurements from a single-specimen type are used to establish diagnostic strategies, interpret clinical-trial results for vaccines and therapeutics, model viral transmission, and understand virus-host interactions. However, measurements from a single-specimen type are implicitly assumed to be representative of other specimen types. We quantified viral-load timecourses from individuals who began daily self-sampling of saliva, anterior-nares (nasal), and oropharyngeal (throat) swabs before or at the incidence of infection with the Omicron variant. Viral loads in different specimen types from the same person at the same timepoint exhibited extreme differences, up to 109 copies/mL. These differences were not due to variation in sample self-collection, which was consistent. For most individuals, longitudinal viral-load timecourses in different specimen types did not correlate. Throat-swab and saliva viral loads began to rise as many as 7 days earlier than nasal-swab viral loads in most individuals, leading to very low clinical sensitivity of nasal swabs during the first days of infection. Individuals frequently exhibited presumably infectious viral loads in one specimen type while viral loads were low or undetectable in other specimen types. Therefore, defining an individual as infectious based on assessment of a single-specimen type underestimates the infectious period, and overestimates the ability of that specimen type to detect infectious individuals. For diagnostic COVID-19 testing, these three single-specimen types have low clinical sensitivity, whereas a combined throat-nasal swab, and assays with high analytical sensitivity, was inferred to have significantly better clinical sensitivity to detect presumed pre-infectious and infectious individuals.

Clinical Value of Serial Quantitative Analysis of Cytomegalovirus DNA in Blood and Saliva Over the First 24Months of Life in Congenital Infection: The French Cymepedia Cohort.

To evaluate cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load dynamics in blood and saliva during the first 2years of life in symptomatic and asymptomatic infected infants and to identify whether these kinetics could have practical clinical implications. The Cymepedia cohort prospectively included 256 congenitally infected neonates followed for 2years. Whole blood and saliva were collected at inclusion and months 4 and 12, and saliva at months 18 and 24. Real-time CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed, results expressed as log10 IU/mL in blood and in copies per milliliter in saliva. Viral load in saliva progressively decreased from 7.5 log10 at birth to 3.3 log10 at month 24. CMV PCR in saliva was positive in 100% and 96% of infants at 6 and 12months, respectively. In the first month of life, neonatal saliva viral load of less than 5 log10 was related to a late CMV transplacental passage. Detection in blood was positive in 92% of neonates (147/159) in the first month of life. No viral load threshold values in blood or saliva could be associated with a high risk of sequelae. Neonatal blood viral load of less than 3 log10 IU/mL had a 100% negative predictive value for long-term sequelae. Viral loads in blood and saliva by CMV PCR testing in congenital infection fall over the first 24months. In this study of infants affected mainly after primary maternal infection during pregnancy, all salivary samples were positive in the first 6months of life and sequelae were not seen in infants with neonatal blood viral load of less than 3 log10 IU/mL.

In vivo efficacy of 2% povidone iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, and herbal extract mouthwash on SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva: A randomized clinical trial.

One of the major techniques to reduce the transmission rate of COVID-19 would be to decrease the viral titers of SARS-CoV-2 in the saliva of infected patients and it is particularly useful in a dental setting. The present study evaluated the change in salivary viral load of COVID-19 patients using povidone iodine (PI), chlorhexidine (CHX), and an herbal extract (RightSure®) oral antiviral herbal mouthwash (HM) at clinically recommended duration and concentrations. Thirty individuals with SARS-CoV-2 were randomly allocated to three groups: (1) Group 1, PI mouthwash; (2) Group 2, CHX mouthwash; and (3) Group 3, HM mouthwash. A baseline salivary throat sample was collected from all the participants who were later instructed to rinse with their respective mouthwash for 30 s. A second salivary sample was collected 30 min after rinsing. The SARS-CoV-2 viral load was analyzed using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction wherein the cyclic threshold (Ct) values were evaluated. Independent t-test analysis reported a statistically significant difference concerning the PI group (before-after comparison) (P < 0.05). The rest of the two study groups failed to report any significant difference in the nucleocapsid gene and open reading frame 1a gene levels. While all three types of mouthwash increased the Ct values, a statistically significant difference was observed with PI mouthwash, indicating that it might potentially reduce the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, especially via aerosol but further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up periods are required to investigate this relationship.