Understanding the hydrochemical evolution of surface water and groundwater is crucial for protecting regional ecological environments. Currently, there are few quantitative studies on the relative contributions of different processes to salinity enrichment of water bodies. In this study, sixty-seven water samples were collected for chemical, and isotopic analysis, along with simulation calculations. The results reveal distinct hydrochemical types of river water, phreatic water, lake water and hot spring water in the investigated area are Ca-Mg-HCO3, Na-Ca-HCO3, Na-SO4-HCO3 and Na-HCO3, respectively. Average temperature and depth of geothermal water storage are 196℃ and 1338m, respectively. Average arsenic (As) content in hot spring water (298μg/L) higher than that in lake water (39.2μg/L), river water (9.59μg/L) and phreatic water (4.02μg/L). The ∑REEs content of river water in the study area is much higher than that of phreatic water and lake water. Result of δD and δ18O indicate that atmospheric precipitation is the source of recharge for all water bodies in the study area. Quantitative calculations indicate that evapo-concentration significantly enriches lake water salinity, contributing on average 90% of its salt content. In contrast, mineral dissolution contributes predominantly to the salinity of hot spring water (90.7%), phreatic water (65.8%), and river water (45.2%). Evapo-concentration emerges as the dominant mechanism for lake water salinity, while carbonate mineral dissolution primarily affects river water. Phreatic water and hot spring water are mainly controlled by the weathering and dissolution of silicate. The results can provide a theoretical basis for the study of the formation mechanism of water salinity in other regions with similar geological environment in the world.
Read full abstract