MLRy 98.4, 2003 1005 chips offold blocks. Most ofthe contributors, and I superglossingthem, want to stress the unstable nature (or in today's parlance, the indeterminacy) of all classification. Genre seems to be an unusual instance of a term and concept that have got more pre? cise, at least in intention, over the centuries, though we should remember the slipperiness of all rhetorical nomenclature. Perhaps we are more pedantic than our ancestors. Alexander Regier, concentrating on More's Utopia and Voltaire's 'Eldorado', pro? vides an intricate overview of utopia as a genre. 'Just as a view fromnowhere in epistemological enquiry is impossible, itis more than difficultto defend a view of nowhere in textual form as possibly neutral' (pp. 20-21). Regier is very much taken with the idea of the self-deconstructive text, though he omits to see anything frightening in such intellectual autocombustion. (Bunuel claimed to dream happily of watching all his films go up in flames.) More positively, Regier finds cause forreassurance in Borges's Tlo'n. No participant mentions Pataphysicians, who have amply demonstrated that any body of rules, in their case a self-imposed corset, can be wonderful starting-blocks towards creativity. In everyday life,who has not thought or said that rules were meant to be broken? Anna Myatt donates a useful survey on autobiography. It seems we have grown as sceptical of the veracity of autobiography or fiction, and the two obviously overlap, as of politicians' utterances. We do not want to be suckered by snake-oil vendors of any persuasion. Myatt's survey ends with a strong recommendation of Perec's W ou le souvenir d'enfance, which, she plausibly argues, fruitfullycombines the two ostensible opposites, fiction and autobiography, by its desperate efforts to recover an occulted past while using multiple literary devices towards that would-be honest end. Sarah Cant focuses on Serge Doubrovsky and Patrick Modiano. The first subtly modifies the term autofiction to autofriction, which he defines as 'patiemment onaniste, qui espere maintenant partager un plaisir' (p. 86)?which nicely captures the outward-turned self-indulgence of such writing. On the other hand, surely the obsessive playing with identity and time zones in Modiano's texts is more tedious than Doubrovsky's wittyand occasionally moving games. No doubt valuation is still a dirtyword today formany. Less understandably than hermit writers who want to keep their own lives private, Modiano appears to want to keep his published world private. Oona Macfarlane, finally,defends the genre ofthe detective novel, widely enjoyed but much maligned because of its generally formulaic composition. She closes by echoing the leitmotif of the whole collection, emphasizing 'the importance of understanding generic paradigms as a springboard forinvention, not as a formal straitjacket' (p. 139). Genres are unavoidable but circumventable. University of Reading Walter Redfern La Presse regionale: des affichesaux grands quotidiens. By Marc Martin. Paris: Fayard. 2002. 501pp. ?25. ISBN 2-2136-1054-1. Anybody who has ever read a French regional newspaper will know that its coverage encompasses both the global and the village. This helps explain why,as Marc Martin informs us in the thought-provoking introductory paragraph to the present vol? ume, the regional press (including the specifically Parisian or Ile-de-France papers) accounts for more than three quarters of daily newspaper sales in France; why the biggest-selling French daily is Ouest-France; and why fifteenprovincial towns publish newspapers that outsell Liberation. It is clear from these facts that the regional press is of national significance in France, and, from certain perspectives, of more national significance than the national newspapers. The vocation of Martin's book is to provide an overview of the history of this press, one that does not treat itas a poor relation of its 1006 Reviews 'national' or Parisian counterpart, and to give a clear idea of its distinctive place in the French media landscape. Martin manages to give this overview in a very readable manner and without being superficial. He acknowledges and draws on the excellent work that has been done on individual titles, periods, and geographical areas. A particularly welcome aspect is the significant space devoted to considering newspapers as eco? nomic and social entities...