Sagittal Spinal Alignment Research Articles

Interrelationships of cervical spine sagittal alignment and whole spinopelvic alignment under implications of musculoskeletal health among independent elderly women in Taiwan: A cross-sectional study.

Older women are at increased risk of spinal misalignment and its associated complications. This study investigated the influence of age, grip strength, and various sagittal spinal parameters on spinal alignment. The results indicate the need for comprehensive management strategies. This cross-sectional study included 200 older women who underwent bone health evaluations at the orthopedic department of a hospital. The study participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, grip strength measurement, and full-length spine radiography. Clinical and radiographic parameters were analyzed through Pearson correlation and linear regression analyses. Significant correlations were identified between grip strength and spinal parameters such as C7 slope and global tilt, indicating that muscle strength affects spinal alignment. Advanced age was associated with changes in sagittal spinal parameters, indicating that changes occur in body compensation over time. Furthermore, pelvic parameters such as pelvic tilt and sacral slope were significantly correlated with spinal curvature, indicating their critical roles in maintaining spinal stability. This study revealed the critical roles of muscle strength and pelvic alignment in the management of spinal health in older women with low bone mass. Targeted interventions for increasing muscle strength, correcting posture, and achieving hormonal balance can notably improve spinal stability and reduce the risk of associated complications. Longitudinal studies should be conducted to validate and refine the intervention strategies and to extend the study findings.

Relationship Between the Axis of the Humeral Heads and the Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Asymptomatic Volunteers

Relationship Between the Axis of the Humeral Heads and the Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Asymptomatic Volunteers

More neck pain, less spinal mobility, altered sitting posture: Sagittal spinal alignment and mobility in women with chronic neck pain

BackgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that people with chronic neck pain (CNP) may display altered biomechanics beyond the cervical spine. However, whether spinal alignment and mobility are associated with neck pain is not clarified. ObjectivesTo investigate whether there is a significant association between neck pain intensity and sagittal spinal alignment and mobility in people with CNP, and to examine whether sagittal spinal alignment and mobility differ according to pain intensity. DesignA cross-sectional study. MethodForty-four women with CNP were included. The neck pain intensity at rest and during neck movements was assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS). A skin-surface measurement device was used to assess sagittal alignment and mobility while sitting and standing. Linear regression analysis was used to assess associations. Participants were divided into two groups according to the pain intensity as group with mild pain (VAS≤4.4 cm) and group with moderate to severe pain (VAS>4.4 cm) and compared using the analysis of covariance. ResultsGreater resting pain was associated with a more forward trunk during sitting (Beta = 0.433, p < 0.05). Greater pain during neck movements was associated with increased lumbar lordosis during sitting (Beta = −0.376, p < 0.05). Classified by pain intensity at rest, trunk mobility while sitting was lower and forward trunk inclination and sacral kyphosis while sitting were higher in those with moderate/severe pain (η2p = 0.093–0.119, p < 0.05). By pain intensity during neck movements, women with moderate/severe pain exhibited lower sacral mobility while sitting (η2p = 0.129, p < 0.05). ConclusionsAddressing the entire spine in the assessment and management of CNP may help reduce pain.

How global spine sagittal alignment and spinal degeneration affect locomotive syndrome risk in the elderly.

The aim of this study was to delineate the features of the locomotive syndrome (LS) risk stage in the elderly population, encompassing global spine sagittal alignment, visible spinal degenerative changes on plain radiographs, muscle strength, physical capabilities, and low back pain (LBP). The study enrolled 232 subjects, evaluated using plain radiographs. The evaluation included measurements of lumbar lordosis (LLA), thoracic kyphosis (TKA), spinal inclination (SIA) angles, and sagittal vertical axis. Assessments included lumbar osteophyte formation (LOF) and lumbar disc height (LDH) to examine spinal degenerative changes. LS evaluation used the locomotive syndrome risk test based on LS risk criteria, classifying participants into no risk, stage 1 LS, and stage 2 LS groups. Using a visual analogue scale (VAS), we investigated the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and assessed physical performances across these groups. There were 132 participants with no LS risk, 71 with stage 1 LS risk, and 29 with stage 2 LS risk. As LS risk increased, LBP prevalence and VAS scores rose, physical abilities, and back muscle strength decreased. TKA showed no variation across groups, while LLA decreased with advancing LS risk stage. Except for L1-L2 and L5-S1, lumbar disc height (LDH) decreased with higher LS risk stages. LOF occurrence increased notably with higher LS risk stages. Spinal inclination angle (SIA) significantly increased with advancing LS risk stages. Participants diagnosed with LS exhibited an increased incidence of spinal degeneration, reduced LLA, and global spinal imbalance characterized by anterior spinal inclination.

Spino-pelvic parameters and back pain in patients without coronal deformity or history of spinal surgery: A cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND: During the last two decades, there has been a growing interest in spinal sagittal alignment. Most published studies have focused on the role of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity or in those with previous spinal fusion. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore possible association between disability related to back pain and spinopelvic parameters in the absence of coronal deformity or previous spinal surgery. METHODS: In the setting of a larger study involving patients with low back pain (LBP), those without previous surgery or spinal deformity in the coronal plane were selected. A total of 52 patients (mean age 59 years, range 21–86, 23 men and 29 women) were found. The visual analogic scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI) were recorded. Surgimap software was used to measure the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics software. Pearson or Spearman correlation were the test of choice depending on the specific variables. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was found between SVA and ODI (r 0.59, p&lt; 0.03). Increased pelvic tilt was also associated with more severe disability related to back pain (r 0.48, p&lt; 0.03). PI-LL mismatch showed moderate association with disability and severity of back pain, although this association did not reach statistical significance (r 0.52, p&lt; 0.08). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that sagittal misalignment may be related with more severe disability and back pain in patients with minor or null deformity in the coronal plane.

Comparative Study of Preoperative Sagittal Spinal Pelvic Alignment in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Cervical spondylosis may lead to changes in the sagittal parameters of the neck and trigger compensatory alterations in systemic sagittal parameters. However, there is currently a dearth of comparative research on the changes and compensatory alterations to sagittal parameters resulting from different types of cervical spondylosis. This study compared the preoperative sagittal alignment sequences among patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) caused by factors resulting from non-OPLL factors. Full length lateral X-ray of the spine and cervical computed tomography (CT) of 256 patients (134 men, 122 women; mean age, 56.9 ± 9.5 years) were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 4096 radiomics features were measured through the lateral X-ray by two spinal surgeons with extensive experience. The clinical symptoms measures were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, number of hand actions in 10 s, hand-grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) score. Normally distributed data was compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for parametric variables and χ2 test were used to analyze the categorical data. In the OPLL group, the C2-C7 Cobb angle was greater than in the CSR and CSM groups (19.8 ± 10.4°, 13.3 ± 10.3°, and 13.9 ± 9.9°, respectively, p < 0.001). Additionally, the C7-S1 SVA measure was found to be situated in the anterior portion with regards to the CSM and CSR groups (19.7 ± 58.4°, -6.3 ± 34.3° and -26.3 ± 32.9°, p < 0.001). Moreover, the number of individuals with C7-S1 SVA >50 mm was significantly larger than the CSM group (26/69, 11/83, p < 0.001). In the CSR group, the TPA demonstrated smaller values compared to the OPLL group (8.8 ± 8.5°, 12.7 ± 10.2°, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the SSA was comparatively smaller as opposed to both the OPLL and CSM groups (49.6 ± 11.2°, 54.2 ± 10.8° and 54.3 ± 9.3°, p < 0.05). Patients with OPLL exhibit greater cervical lordosis than those with CSR and CSM. However, OPLL is more likely to result in spinal imbalance when compared to the CSM group. Furthermore, OPLL and CSM patients exhibit anterior trunk inclination and worse global spine sagittal parameters in comparison to CSR patients.

Influence of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to os odontoideum on sagittal alignment and balance of the subaxial cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.

This retrospective study aims to investigate the effect of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation due to os odontoideum on the sagittal alignment and balance of the cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion. Data of 48 consecutive patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion to treat atlantoaxial dislocation/instability due to os odontoideum were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic variables, namely the T1 slope (T1S), C1-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C1-C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-C7 SVA, and modified atlas-dens interval (MADI), were measured preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups based on the preoperative MADI. Differences within and between groups in radiographic variables and relationships between the investigated variables were analyzed. The MADI was correlated with the preoperative to postoperative changes in the C1-C2 angle (r = 0.776, P < 0.05) and C2-C7 angle (r = -0.357, P < 0.05). In the group with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation, the C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 SVA were significantly enlarged at final follow-up (P < 0.05), while the C2-C7 angle was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The changes in C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle were opposite between the posterior group and the anterior dislocation group. The direction/type of atlantoaxial subluxation correlates with the changes in lower cervical curvature after atlantoaxial fusion. Patients with atlantoaxial posterior dislocation and atlantoaxial instability are less likely than those with atlantoaxial anterior dislocation to develop loss of lordosis after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.

Relationship of total sagittal spinal alignment index of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis with physical function in community-dwelling older adults

ABSTRACT Background Overall spinal curvature is evaluated by calculating the difference between the angles of lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) and is expressed as LL minus TK (LL-TK). It is unclear whether LL-TK is associated with physical function in community-dwelling older adults and whether it is more relevant than TK or LL alone. Objective This study aimed to identify whether LL-TK is associated with physical function in community-dwelling older adults, and whether it is strongly associated than TK or LL alone. Methods The participants comprised 1,674 community-dwelling older adults who underwent physical assessments (women, n = 1,099; mean age, 67.4 ± 5.3 years). As spinal alignment indices, TK and LL were measured using skin surface methods, and LL-TK was calculated as the difference between them. Decreased LL-TK indicated increased overall spinal curvature. Physical function was determined by measuring single-leg standing, five-times chair-stand, and usual gait speed. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed with each physical function as the dependent variable and spinal alignment indices as the independent variables, with adjustments. Results Multiple regression analyses showed that single-leg standing (β = 0.092, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.071 to 0.214, p < .001) and five-times chair-stand (β=-0.142, 95% CI = −0.037 to −0.019, p < .001) were significantly associated with LL-TK, but not LL. Both LL-TK (β = 0.121, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.004, p < .001) and LL (β = 0.087, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.003, p = .003) were significant determinants of usual gait speed. Conclusions This study showed that decreased LL-TK may be associated with poor physical function. This association may be stronger than that observed for TK or LL alone.

Sagittal spinal alignment measurements and evaluation: Historical perspective

Spinal alignment analysis play an important role in evaluating patients and planning surgical corrections for adult spinal deformity. The history of these parameters is relatively short with the first parameter, the Cobb angle, introduced in 1948 as part of an effort to improve scoliosis evaluation. New developments in the field were limited for nearly 30 years before better imaging technology encouraged new theories and later data about spinal alignment and the relationship between the spine and pelvis. These efforts would ultimately contribute to the creation of foundational spinal alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. By the 1990s, spinal alignment had become a sustained area of investigation for spinal surgeons and researchers. Novel alignment parameters have since been introduced as our knowledge has evolved and has allowed for valuable research that demonstrates the clinical and surgical value of alignment measurement. This manuscript will explore the history of spinal alignment analysis over the decades.

Identification and impact of failure of pelvic compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPrevious research has identified a specific subtype known as failure of pelvic compensation (FPC) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, the criteria for assessing FPC remain inconsistent, and its impacts on spinal sagittal alignment and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores remain unclear. PURPOSETo propose a novel criterion for identifying FPC based on variations in spinopelvic alignment during the transition from the supine to upright position and to evaluate the effects of FPC on patients' spinal sagittal alignment and HRQoL scores. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients with ASD from a monocenter database. OUTCOME MEASURESRadiographic measures, including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), were measured on lateral whole-spine radiographs. LL and SS were also measured on reconstructed lumbar computed tomography images in the sagittal view taken in the supine position. The relative functional cross-sectional area (rFCSA) of paraspinal muscles was evaluated via lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. HRQoL measures, encompassing visual analog scale for back pain (VAS-BP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R), were collected. METHODSA total of 154 patients were enrolled. Based on the calculated minimum detectable change of SS, FPC was defined as the change in SS of less than 3.4° between supine and upright positions. Patients were divided into 3 groups: sagittal balance with pelvic compensation (SI-PC), sagittal imbalance with pelvic compensation (SI-PC), and sagittal imbalance with failure of pelvic compensation (SI-FPC). Radiographic parameters and HRQoL scores were compared among the groups. RESULTSThirty-six patients were categorized into the SB-PC group, 87 into the SI-PC group, and 31 into the SI-FPC group. Patients with low PI and small paraspinal muscles rFCSA were more prone to experiencing FPC accompanied by severe sagittal imbalance. The SI-FPC group exhibited less TK and a larger SS than the SI-PC group exhibited and had a similar SVA as that of the SI-PC group. Additionally, they displayed worse VAS-BP, ODI, SRS-function, and SRS-22 total scores than the SB-PC group displayed. CONCLUSIONSIn patients with ASD, an inherently low pelvic compensatory reserve and a high fatty infiltration in paraspinal muscles are pivotal factors contributing to FPC. Compared with SI-PC patients, SI-FPC patients demonstrate a thoracic-dominant compensatory pattern for sagittal malalignment. In addition, these patients experienced more severe pain and functional decline than the SB-PC patients experienced.

Harmony between spinopelvic mismatch and sagittal hip alignment contributes to upright standing in females: a cross-sectional study.

In upright standing, spinopelvic mismatch is compensated by hip extension. However, few studies have investigated the reciprocal relationship between the sagittal alignment of the hip joints and spinopelvic mismatch during upright standing in humans. Our study aims to investigate (I) the relationship between spinopelvic mismatch and hip extension and (II) whether insufficient hip extension against spinopelvic mismatch, i.e., pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL), affects trunk inclination in upright standing. This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study. We included 398 consecutive female patients treated for osteoporosis at our outpatient department between November 2017 and June 2022. Patients with any of the following were excluded from the study: (I) those whose plain whole-spine radiographs did not cover the femurs, (II) those with fractures in the vertebrae or lower extremities, (III) those with a history of surgery of the spine or of the lower extremities, (IV) those with scoliosis with a Cobb angle ≥10° in the anteroposterior radiograph, and (V) those with transitional vertebrae. Sixty-two patients were divided into normal and malalignment groups based on their sagittal spinal alignment. The patients underwent plain whole-spine radiography as a routine examination. A linear approximation between the pelvic femoral angle (PFA), representing hip extension, and PI-LL was obtained in both groups. The optimal PFA of each patient was obtained by substituting the PI-LL into the linear approximation of the normal group. The difference between the optimal and measured PFA was defined as the ΔPFA for each patient. The correlation between the ΔPFA and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was evaluated in both groups. The PFA and PI-LL were correlated in both groups. The malalignment group had a significantly greater ΔPFA than the normal group. ΔPFA was correlated with SVA only in the malalignment group. The magnitude of the ΔPFA indicated insufficient hip extension to compensate for the spinopelvic mismatch during upright standing.

Pre-contoured patient-specific rods result in superior immediate sagittal plane alignment than surgeon contoured rods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery typically involves posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using rods contoured by the surgeon, which may be time-consuming and may not reliably restore optimal sagittal alignment. However, pre-contoured patient-specific rods may more optimally restore sagittal spinal alignment. This study evaluates the radiographic outcomes of AIS patients who underwent PSF utilizing surgeon contoured vs. pre-contoured rods. This is a retrospective cohort study of AIS patients who underwent PSF with either surgeon contoured or pre-contoured rods. Demographics, Lenke classification, fused levels, osteotomies, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time were also obtained via chart review. Coronal curve magnitude, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were obtained pre-operatively, postoperatively and at last follow up. Outcome measures included rate of achievement of postoperative radiographic alignment goals (TK between 20 and 40 degrees, PI-LL mismatch within 10 degrees, and TPA <14 degrees). Predicted post-operative sagittal alignment was also compared with observed measurements. Student's and paired t-tests were performed to determine significant mean differences for continuous variables, and chi-square for categorical variables. No differences were found in demographics, Lenke classification, preop radiographic measurements, fused levels, osteotomies, EBL, and surgical time in the surgeon contoured cohort (n=36; average follow up 11.3 months) and pre-contoured cohort (n=22; average follow up 9.7 months). At last follow up, 95.5% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 61.1% of patients with surgeon contoured rods (P=0.004) met TK goal. During assessment of first standing postoperative X-ray, 72.7% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 33.3% of patients with surgeon contoured rods met PI-LL mismatch goal (P=0.004). Other radiographic measurements were similar. Artificial intelligence (AI) predicted and observed differences for the pre-contoured group were 3.7 for TK (P=0.005), -7.6 for PI-LL mismatch (P=0.002), and -2.6 for TPA (P=0.11). AI and pre-contoured rods help achieve global sagittal balance with high accuracy and improved kyphosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch than surgeon contoured rods in AIS patients.

Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery with Harrington instrumentations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

In the 1960s, Harrington instrumentation (HRI) revolutionized the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Despite the transition to more innovative techniques, concerns regarding its impact on sagittal alignment, associations with low back pain, and correction loss have consistently persisted. The aim of this meta-analysis is precisely to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the complications of patients treated with HRI over an extended follow-up period. A systematic search of articles about AIS patients who underwent HRI and reported long-term outcomes (> 10years) was conducted on electronic databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Data regarding radiographic and clinical outcomes were extracted and meta-analyses were performed. Eleven studies comprising 644 patients were included. The mean follow-up ranged from 10.8 to 51.7years. Radiographic analysis revealed a decrease in the main curve Cobb angle from 60.6° to 38.3°, with a correction loss of - 9.49° between postoperative and last follow-up. Concerning sagittal parameters, preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 19.65° at last follow-up, and preoperative lumbar lordosis was 42.94°. Additional spine surgeries were required in 42% of patients. Clinical outcomes varied among studies, but overall, HRI patients showed comparable quality of life and function to controls, although a higher incidence of low back pain was reported. Patients who underwent HRI exhibited suboptimal correction of rib deformity and a flattened sagittal spinal alignment. However, they generally displayed favourable long-term functional outcomes. Despite the implant's tendency to reduce lumbar curvature, patients achieved good clinical outcomes and functional scores comparable to age-matched individuals, suggesting that disability is not an inevitable consequence of lumbar flattening.

How does cervical sagittal profile change after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion.

This study aimed to evaluate the cervical sagittal profile after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance and analyze the associations between the changes in cervical sagittal alignment and spinopelvic parameters. In this retrospective radiographic study, we analyzed 90 patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) and sagittal imbalance who underwent short lumbar fusion (imbalance group). We used 60 patients with DLS and sagittal balance as the control group (balance group). Patients in the imbalance group were also divided into two groups according to the preoperative PI: low PI group (≤ 50°), high PI group (PI > 50°). We measured the spinal sagittal alignment parameters on the long-cassette standing lateral radiographs of the whole spine. We compared the changes of spinal sagittal parameters between pre-operation and post-operation. We observed the relationships between the changes in cervical profile and spinopelvic parameters. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) occurred spontaneous compensation (p = 0.000) and significant changes were observed in cervical lordosis (CL) (p = 0.000) and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (p = 0.023) after surgery in the imbalance group. However, there were no significant differences in the radiographic parameters from pre-operation to post-operation in the balance group. The variations in CL were correlated with the variations in SVA (R = 0.307, p = 0.041). The variations in cSVA were correlated with the variations in SVA (R=-0.470, p = 0.001). Cervical sagittal profile would have compensatory changes after short lumbar fusion. The spontaneous decrease in CL would occur in patients with DLS after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion. The changes of cervical sagittal profile were related to the extent of the spontaneous compensation of SVA.

Comprehensive assessment of global spinal sagittal alignment and related normal spinal loads in a healthy population

Abnormal postoperative global sagittal alignment (GSA) is associated with an increased risk of mechanical complications after spinal surgery. Typical assessment of sagittal alignment relies on a few selected measures, disregarding global complexity and variability of the sagittal curvature. The normative range of spinal loads associated with GSA has not yet been considered in clinical evaluation. The study objectives were to develop a new GSA assessment method that holistically describes the inherent relationships within GSA and to estimate the related spinal loads.Vertebral endplates were annotated on radiographs of 85 non-pathological subjects. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to derive a Statistical Shape Model (SSM). Associations between identified GSA variability modes and conventional alignment measures were assessed. Simulations of respective Shape Modes (SMs) were performed using an established musculoskeletal AnyBody model to estimate normal variation in cervico-thoraco-lumbar loads.The first six principal components explained 97.96% of GSA variance. The SSM provides the normative range of GSA and a visual representation of the main variability modes. Normal variation relative to the population mean in identified alignment features was found to influence spinal loads, e.g. the lower bound of the second shape mode (SM2-2σ) corresponds to an increase in L4L5-compression by 378.64 N (67.86%).Six unique alignment features were sufficient to describe GSA almost entirely, demonstrating the value of the proposed method for an objective and comprehensive analysis of GSA. The influence of these features on spinal loads provides a normative biomechanical reference, eventually guiding surgical planning of deformity correction in the future.

Surgical treatment of Roussouly type 1 with realigning Roussouly spinal shape and improving SRS-Schwab modifier: effect on minimal clinically important difference.

To evaluate outcomes of choosing different Roussouly shapes and improving in Schwab modifiers for surgical Roussouly type 1 patients. Baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) clinical data of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients presenting with Roussouly type 1 sagittal spinal alignment were isolated in the single-center spine database. Patients were grouped into Roussouly type 1, 2 and 3 with anteverted pelvis (3a) postoperatively. Schwab modifiers at BL and 2Y were categorized as follows: no deformity (0), moderate deformity (+), and severe deformity (++) for pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL). Improvement in SRS-Schwab was defined as a decrease in the severity of any modifier at 2Y. A total of 96 patients (69.9 years, 72.9% female, 25.2kg/m2) were included. At 2Y, there were 34 type 1 backs, 60 type 2 backs and only 2 type 3a. Type 1 and type 2 did not differ in rates of reaching 2Y minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores (all P > 0.05). Two patients who presented with type 3a had poor HRQOL scores. Analysis of Schwab modifiers showed that 41.7% of patients improved in SVA, 45.8% in PI-LL, and 36.5% in PT. At 2Y, patients who improved in SRS-Schwab PT and SVA had lower Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores and significantly more of them reached MCID for ODI (all P < 0.001). Patients who improved in SRS-Schwab SVA and PI-LL had more changes of VAS Back and Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcomes questionnaire physical component summary (SF-36 PCS), and significantly more reached MCID (all P < 0.001). By 2Y, type 2 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for VAS back and ODI at the highest rate (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively), and type 1 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for SF-36 PCS at the highest rate (P < 0.001). For ASD patients classified as Roussouly type 1, postoperative improvement in SRS-Schwab grades reflected superior patient-reported outcomes while type 1 and type 2 did not differ in clinical outcomes at 2Y. However, development of type 3a should be avoided at the risk of poor functional outcomes. Utilizing both classification systems in surgical decision-making can optimize postoperative outcomes.

Mobility of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (spinopelvic mobility) and sagittal spinal alignment - implications for surgeons performing hip arthroplasty.

The optimal positioning of the hip prosthesis components is influenced by the mobility and balance of the spine. The present study classifies patients with pathology of the spino-pelvic-hip complex, showing possible methods of preventing hip dislocations after arthroplasty. Hip-Spine Classification helps arthroplasty surgeons to implant components in more patient-specific position. The group of 100 patients treated with total hip arthroplasty. Antero-posterior (AP) X-rays of the pelvis in a standing position, lateral spine (standing and sitting) and AP of the pelvis (supine after the procedure) were analyzed. We analyzed a change in sacral tilt value when changing from standing to sitting (∆SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL) Mismatch, sagittal lumbar pelvic balance (standing position). Patients were classified according to the Hip-Spine Classification. Postoperatively, the inclination and anteversion of the implanted acetabular component were measured. In our study 1A was diagnosed in 61% of all cases, 1B in 18%, 2A in 16%, 2B in 5%. 50 out of 61 (82%) in group 1A were placed within the Levinnek "safe zone". In 1B, 2A, 2B, the position of the acetabular component was influenced by both the spinopelvic mobility and sagittal spinal balance. The mean inclination was 43.35° and the anteversion was 17.4°. Categorizing patients according to Hip-Spine Classification one can identify possible consequences the patients at risk. Pathology of the spino-pelvic-hipcomplex can lead to destabilization or dislocation of hip after surgery even though implanted according to Lewinnek's indications. Our findings suggest that Lewinnek safe zone should be abandoned in favor of the concept of functional safe zones.

Efficacy of kinesio tape added to lumbar stabilization exercises on adult patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial

BackgroundLumbar stabilization exercises (LSEs) are beneficial for chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP). However, further research focusing on intervention combinations is recommended. This study examined the effect of kinesio tape (KT) with LSEs on CMLBP adult patients. MethodsA randomized blinded clinical trial was conducted. Fifty CMLBP patients of both genders were assigned into one of two groups and received 8 weeks of treatment: group A (control): LSEs only, and group B (experimental): KT with LSEs. The primary outcome was back disability, measured by the Oswestry disability index. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, trunk extensor endurance, and sagittal spinal alignment, as indicated by the visual analog scale, Sorensen-test, and C7–S1 sagittal vertical axis, respectively. The reported data was analyzed by a two-way MANOVA using an intention-to-treat procedure. ResultsMultivariate tests indicate statistically significant effects for group (F = 4.42, p = 0.005, partial η2 = 0.148), time (F = 219.55, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.904), and group-by-time interaction (F = 3.21, p = 0.01, partial η2 = 0.149). Univariate comparisons between groups revealed significant reductions in the experimental group regarding disability (p = 0.029, partial η2 = 0.049) and pain (p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.102) without a significant difference in the Sorensen test (p = 0.281) or C7–S1 SVA (p = 0.491) results. All within-group comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). ConclusionThe combination of KT and LSEs is an effective CMLBP treatment option. Although patients in both groups displayed significant changes in all outcomes, the combined interventions induced more significant reductions in back disability and pain intensity.

Influence of Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Sitting Posture on the Swallowing Speed of Older Adult Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Thoracolumbar kyphosis in sitting posture is associated with forward head posture and may adversely affect swallowing function. However, few studies have investigated the effect of spinal alignment in the sitting posture on the swallowing function of older adults. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether spinal alignment in the sitting posture influences the swallowing function of older adult women. Overall, 18 older adult women (mean age, 69.78 ± 3.66years) without dysphagia were enrolled. Participants were positioned in two sitting postures, namely, comfortable sitting (CS) and thoracic upright sitting (TUS). In each sitting posture, the kyphosis index (using a flexicurve), sagittal angles (head, cervical, shoulder, and pelvic angles; using a digital camera), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. Swallowing speed (100-mL water swallowing test), maximum tongue pressure (MTP), and oral diadochokinesis (ODK) were also evaluated. Compared with TUS, CS showed a greater kyphosis index, anterior head translation, and posterior pelvic tilt. CS had greater flexion (p < 0.001) and less extension (p < 0.001) of cervical ROM than TUS. Swallowing speed was significantly decreased in CS compared with TUS (p = 0.008). MTP and ODK were not significantly different between CS and TUS. Thus, changes in sitting posture with spinal alignment may affect swallowing speed. Consequently, adjustments to reduce sitting postural kyphosis in older adult women may improve swallowing speed.

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning.

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.