Safety Profile Of Abatacept Research Articles

Infection outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Results from a 10-year international post-marketing study

ObjectiveTo evaluate risk of infections requiring hospitalization and opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with abatacept versus conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts) DMARDs. MethodsFive international observational data sources were used: two biologic registries (Sweden, Germany), a disease registry (USA) and two healthcare claims databases (Canada, USA). Crude incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 patient-years, with 95 % CIs, were used to estimate rate ratios (RRs) comparing abatacept versus csDMARDs or other b/tsDMARDs. RRs were adjusted for demographic factors, comorbidities, and other potential confounders and then pooled across data sources using a random effects model (REM). ResultsThe data sources included 6450 abatacept users, 136,636 csDMARD users and 54,378 other b/tsDMARD users, with a mean follow-up range of 2.2–6.2 years. Across data sources, the IRs for infections requiring hospitalization ranged from 16 to 56 for abatacept, 19–46 for csDMARDs, and 18–40 for other b/tsDMARDs. IRs for opportunistic infections were 0.4–7.8, 0.3–4.3, and 0.5–3.8; IRs for tuberculosis were 0.0–8.4, 0.0–6.0, and 0.0–6.3, respectively. The pooled adjusted RR (95 % CI), only reported for infections requiring hospitalization, was 1.2 (0.6–2.2) for abatacept versus csDMARDs and 0.9 (0.6–1.3) versus other b/tsDMARDs. ConclusionsData from this international, observational study showed similar hospitalized infection risk for abatacept versus csDMARDs or other b/tsDMARDs. IRs for opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, were low. These data are consistent with the known safety profile of abatacept.

Biological Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Link Between Immune Tolerance and Immune Surveillance.

The biological drugs have all been successfully used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and have led to fair rates of clinical remission; however, the possible occurrence of adverse events such as infectious diseases or cancers means that the patients undergoing treatment need to be closely monitored. Anti-TNF agents, first appeared in the pharmacological algorithm of RA in the early 2000s, seem to lead to a higher risk of reactivated tubercular infection than the biological agents with different mechanism of action (abatacept or rituximab). Although the data on anti-TNF agents and cancer are controversial, their use is currently not recommended in neoplastic patients because of their uncertain effects on immune-surveillance. The safety profile of abatacept is similar to that of other biological agents, while rituximab is used to treat non-Hodgkin lymphomas and is also considered in the case of RA patients with previous hematological or non-hematological malignancies. The risk of infections and new-onset cancers during tocilizumab treatment is similar to that associated with other biological therapies. Finally, under particular circumstances, such as in the presence of infections or malignancies, blocking a specific immunological pathway may be simultaneously successful and detrimental. The only thing that can be done at the moment is to continue to look for adverse events in order to discover these complications as soon as possible, and then develop the most appropriate means of treating (and even preventing) them.

Abatacept in the treatment of polyarticular JIA: development, clinical utility, and place in therapy

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a group of chronic arthritides affecting children. The polyarthritis category, affecting five or more joints in the first six months, tends to be more aggressive, leading to a destructive joint disease with significant morbidity, disability, and costs to society. The current treatment regimen, which primarily combines methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) blockade, still leaves a significant group of patients with an inadequate response. Therefore, the development of new medications that act via other mechanisms of pathogenesis is necessary. T cell lymphocytes are key components in the immune reaction in JIA. Cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is a potent inhibitor of the costimulation pathway necessary to activate T cells. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein comprising the extracellular part of human CTLA-4 connected to a modified Fc part of IgG-1. In a randomized, multinational, blinded withdrawal study in children with polyarticular JIA, abatacept was found to be effective in about 70% of the patients, including 39% of TNF-α blockade failures, with significantly fewer flares occurring during the withdrawal phase than in patients receiving placebo. Abatacept continued to show good efficacy in a three-year open-label extension study, with a beneficial effect on health-related quality of life. The safety profile of abatacept is generally good. In 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration approved abatacept for use in children over six years of age with JIA and a polyarticular course. In 2010, the European Medicines Agency gave approval for abatacept to be used in combination with methotrexate for those who fail at least one disease-modifying medication and TNF-α blockade.