Safety Of Tumor Necrosis Factor Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.

This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Studies were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ichushi-Web, and clinical trial registries (from 2000 to 2021). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the manual for development clinical practice guidelines by Minds, a project promoting evidence-based medicine in Japan, for observational studies. One RCT and 22 observational studies were included. In the RCT on infliximab, the American College of Rheumatology pediatric (ACR Pedi) 30/50/70 responses at 14 weeks were 63.8%/50.0%/22.4%, with relative risks of 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.79)/1.48 (95% CI: 0.95-2.29)/1.89 (95% CI: 0.81-4.40), respectively. In the observational studies, ACR Pedi 30/50/70 responses for etanercept at 12 months were 76.7%/64.7%/46.4%, respectively. Infliximab treatment caused anaphylaxis in 17% and an infusion reaction in 23% of patients. The incidence of macrophage activation syndrome, serious infection and malignancy caused by TNF inhibitors was 0%-4%. Thus, although TNF inhibitors were relatively safe, they were unlikely to be preferentially administered in patients with systemic JIA because of their inadequate efficacy. Further studies, particularly well-designed RCTs, are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of TNF inhibitors for systemic JIA.

Effectiveness and Safety of Biosimilars in Pediatric Non-infectious Uveitis: Real-Life Data from the International AIDA Network Uveitis Registry.

Since many biological drug patents have expired, biosimilar agents (BIOs) have been developed; however, there are still some reservations in their use, especially in childhood. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors BIOs as treatment for pediatric non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Data from pediatric patients with NIU treated with TNF inhibitors BIOs were drawn from the international AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registries dedicated to uveitis and Behçet's disease. The effectiveness and safety of BIOs were assessed in terms of frequency of relapses, risk for developing ocular flares, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glucocorticoids (GCs)-sparing effect, drug survival, frequency of ocular complications, and adverse drug event (AE). Forty-seven patients (77 affected eyes) were enrolled. The BIOs employed were adalimumab (ADA) (89.4%), etanercept (ETA) (5.3%), and infliximab (IFX) (5.3%). The number of relapses 12months prior to BIOs and at last follow-up was 282.14 and 52.43 per 100 patients/year. The relative risk of developing ocular flares before BIOs introduction compared to the period following the start of BIOs was 4.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-5.98, p = 0.004). The number needed to treat (NNT) for ocular flares was 3.53. Median BCVA was maintained during the whole BIOs treatment (p = 0.92). A significant GCs-sparing effect was observed throughout the treatment period (p = 0.002). The estimated drug retention rate (DRR) at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up were 92.7, 83.3, and 70.8%, respectively. The risk rate for developing structural ocular complications was 89.9/100 patients/year before starting BIOs and 12.7/100 patients/year during BIOs treatment, with a risk ratio of new ocular complications without BIOs of 7.1 (CI 3.4-14.9, p = 0.0003). Three minor AEs were reported. TNF inhibitors BIOs are effective in reducing the number of ocular uveitis relapses, preserving visual acuity, allowing a significant GCs-sparing effect, and preventing structural ocular complications. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05200715.

Comparative Safety of Biologic Agents in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease With Active or Recent Malignancy: A Multi-Center Cohort Study

Safety of biologic agents is a key consideration in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and active or recent cancer. We compared the safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists vs non-TNF biologics in patients with IBD with active or recent cancer. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD and either active cancer (cohort A) or recent prior cancer (within ≤5 years; cohort B) who were treated with TNFα antagonists or non-TNF biologics after their cancer diagnosis. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (cohort A) or recurrence-free survival (cohort B). Safety was compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. In cohort A, of 125 patients (483.8 person-years of follow-up evaluation) with active cancer (age, 54 ± 15 y, 75% solid-organ malignancy), 10 of 55 (incidence rate [IR] per 100 py, 4.4) and 9 of 40 (IR, 10.4) patients treated with TNFα antagonists and non-TNF biologics had cancer progression, respectively. There was no difference in the risk of progression-free survival between TNFα antagonists vs non-TNF biologics (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.25-2.30). In cohort B, of 170 patients (513 person-years of follow-up evaluation) with recent prior cancer (age, 53 ± 15 y, 84% solid-organ malignancy; duration of remission, 19 ± 19 mo), 8 of 78 (IR, 3.4) and 5 of 66 (IR 3.7) patients treated with TNFα antagonists and non-TNF biologics had cancer recurrence, respectively. The risk of recurrence-free survival was similar between both groups (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.24-3.77). In patients with IBD with active or recent cancer, TNFα antagonists and non-TNF biologics have comparable safety. The choice of biologic should be dictated by IBD disease severity in collaboration with an oncologist.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

Uveitisis the most common extra-articular manifestation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and a potentially sight-threatening condition characterized by intraocular inflammation. Current treatment for JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-U) is largely based on physician experience, observational evidence and consensus guidelines, resulting in considerable variations in practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)inhibitors used for treatment of JIA-U. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We last searched the electronic databases on 3 February 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TNF inhibitors with placebo in participantswith a diagnosis of JIA and uveitis who were aged 2 to 18 years old. We used standard Cochrane methodology and graded the certainty of the body of evidence for seven outcomes using the GRADE classification. We included three RCTs with 134 participants. One study conducted in the USA randomized participants to etanercept or placebo (N = 12). Two studies, one conducted in the UK (N = 90) and one in France (N = 32), randomized participants to adalimumab or placebo. All studies were at low risk of bias.Initial pooled estimates suggested that TNF-inhibitors may result in little to no difference on treatment success defined as 0 to trace cells on Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN)-grading; or two-step decrease in activity based on SUN grading (estimated risk ratio (RR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 2.10; 2 studies; 43 participants;low-certainty evidence) or treatment failure defined as a two-step increase in activity based on SUN grading (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.01 to 7.15; 1 study; 31 participants;low-certainty evidence). Further analysis using the individual trial definitions of treatment response and failure suggested a positive treatment effect of TNF inhibitors; a RR of treatment success of 2.60 (95% CI 1.30 to 5.20; 3 studies; 124 participants; low-certainty evidence), and RR of treatment failure of 0.23 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.50; 3 studies; 133 participants). Almost all the evidence was on adalimumab and the evidence on etanercept was very limited. For secondary outcomes, one study suggests that adalimumab may have little to no effect on risk of recurrence after induction of remission at three months (RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 20.45; 90 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and visual acuity, but the evidence is very uncertain; mean difference in longitudinal logMAR score change over six months was -0.01 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03) and -0.02 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.03) using the best and worst logMAR measurement, respectively (low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence from one study suggested that adalimumab treatment results in reduction of topical steroid doses at six months (hazard ratio 3.58; 95% CI 1.24 to 10.32; 74 participants who took one or more topical steroid per day at baseline). Adverse events, including injection site reactions and infections, were more common in the TNF inhibitor group. Serious adverse events were uncommon. Adalimumab appears to increase the likelihood of treatment success and decrease the likelihood of treatment failure when compared with placebo. The evidence was less conclusive about a positive treatment effect with etanercept. Adverse events from JIA-U trials are in keeping with the known side effect profile of TNF inhibitors. Standard validated JIA-U outcome measures are required to homogenize assessment and to allow for comparison and analysis of multiple datasets.

Biologic Therapy in Psoriasis (Part I): Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Necrosis Factor- α Inhibitors.

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder, with an estimated global prevalence of 2-3%. Psoriasis is associated with an impaired health-related quality of life and a substantial economic burden. Biologics, which target the pathways involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, represent an established therapeutic approach for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with remarkable efficacy and safety profile extensively examined and monitored. Biological therapies currently available can be divided into three main categories: the TNFα antagonists (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, certolizumab pegol), the interleukin (IL)- 12/23 monoclonal antibody (ustekinumab), and IL-17 inhibitor (secukinumab, ixekizumab). In this section, we explore the complex role of TNFα in psoriasis as well as the efficacy and safety of TNFα inhibitors largely used in the management of the cutaneous disease. Dosing regimens, administration, pharmacodynamics profiles, efficacy, and safety of licensed anti-TNFα are here discussed in detail.

Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade in recurrent and disabling chronic sciatica associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis: results of a double-blind, placebo randomized controlled study

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition with infliximab (IFX) in treating recurrent and disabling chronic sciatica pain associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis.MethodA double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 35 patients presenting with sciatica pain associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis to two groups: IFX (n = 18), a single intravenous injection of 3 mg/kg IFX; and placebo (n = 17), a single saline serum injection. The primary outcome was a 50 % reduction in sciatica pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) at day 10. Secondary outcomes were radicular and lumbar VAS pain at day 0 and radicular and lumbar VAS pain, Québec disability score, drug-sparing effect and tolerance at days 10, 30, 90, and 180.ResultsAt day 10, the placebo and IFX groups did not differ in the primary outcome (50 % reduction in sciatica pain observed in three (17.6 %) versus five (27.8 %) patients; p = 0.69). The number of patients reaching the patient acceptable symptom state for radicular pain was significantly higher in the placebo than IFX group after injection (12 (70.6 %) versus five (27.8 %) patients; p = 0.01). The two groups were comparable for all other secondary outcomes.ConclusionTreatment with a single 3 mg/kg IFX injection for post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis-associated sciatica pain does not significantly reduce radicular symptoms at day 10 after injection.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00385086; registered 4 October 2006 (last updated 15 October 2015).

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockade in recurrent and disabling chronic sciatica associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis: Results of a two-year, double-blind, placebo randomized controlled study

To assess the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition with infliximab (IFX) in treating recurrent and disabling chronic sciatica pain associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis. A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study randomized 35 patients presenting sciatica pain associated with post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis to 2 groups: IFX ( n = 18), a single intravenous injection of 3 mg/kg IFX; and placebo n = 17), a single saline serum injection. The primary outcome was a 50% reduction in sciatica pain on visual analog scale (VAS) at day 10. Secondary outcomes were radicular and lumbar VAS pain at day 0 and radicular and lumbar VAS pain, Québec disability score, drug sparing effect and tolerance at days 10, 30, 90, and 180. At day 10, the placebo and IFX groups did not differ in the primary outcome (50% reduction in sciatica pain observed in 3 [17.6%] vs 5 [27.8%] patients, p = 0.69). The number of patients reaching the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for radicular pain was significantly higher in the placebo than IFX group after injection (12 [70.6%] vs 5 [27.8%], p = 0.01). The 2 groups were comparable for all other secondary outcomes. Treatment with a single 3-mg/kg IFX injection for post-operative peridural lumbar fibrosis-associated sciatica pain does not significantly reduce radicular symptoms at day 10 after injection.

THU0281 Use of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis and Concurrent History of Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C Infection: A Retrospective Analysis of 44 Patients

BackgroundThe safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the setting of HBV and HCV infections is controversial since it has been associated with an increased risk of reactivation of...

AB0493 Anti-TNFα treatment is associated with increased liver stiffness in HBV occult carrier patients

BackgroundHBV occult carriers (i.e HBsAg-/HBcAb+) are at risk for viral reactivation under immunosuppressive treatment for cancer and transplantation. Even if rarely, HBV reactivation has been also reported in occult HBV...

AB0492 Long term safety of anti-TNF alfa in patients with inflammatory arthritis and hbv infection: Focus on hepatitis B surface antibody status

BackgroundThe rate of viral reactivation in occult HBV carriers (HBsAg-/HBcAb+) in the course of immunosuppressive therapy ranges from 5% to 10%.(1) Nevertheless, anti-TNFalpha therapy was reported to be quite a...

Meta-analysis/Systematic review Tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab) in Crohn's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThis meta-analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab) with either a placebo or each of them in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD).Material and methodsA systematic review of literature published up to November 2012 was performed and a meta-analysis of identified studies was carried out. We searched the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and others. Only randomized or clinical controlled trials were included.ResultsNineteen clinical trials fulfilled the established criteria (5 studies for infliximab vs. placebo, 6 for each adalimumab or certolizumab vs. placebo and 2 comparing infliximab with adalimumab). The results of meta-analysis showed that anti-TNF therapy in patients with CD is safe and statistically significantly more effective when compared with the placebo for induction of remission at week 4 (RB = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.55–2.33, p < 0.00001), maintenance of remission at weeks 20–30 (RB = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.61–2.15, p < 0.00001) and at weeks 48–56 (RB = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.13–3.54, p < 0.00001) in patients who responded to the induction therapy and patients randomized before the induction. Anti-TNF agents were also superior to the placebo in fistula healing (during short-term induction, as well as long-term maintenance) and inducing CR-70 but not CR-100 at week 4. Moreover, the anti-TNF therapy had a significant effect on achieving both CR-70 and CR-100 during long-term maintenance.ConclusionsInfliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab are effective as both induction and maintenance therapy in moderate to severe Crohn's disease in adults, including patients with fistulas. The safety profile was acceptable.

The risk of infection and malignancy with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in adults with psoriatic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

There is a need to better understand the safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with psoriatic disease in whom TNF inhibitors are frequently used as monotherapy. We sought to examine the risks of infection and malignancy with the use of TNF antagonists in adult patients with psoriatic disease. We conducted a systematic search for trials of TNF antagonists for adults with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. We included randomized, placebo-controlled trials of etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Twenty of 820 identified studies with a total of 6810 patients were included. Results were calculated using fixed effects models and reported as pooled odds ratios. Odds ratios for overall infection and serious infection over a mean of 17.8 weeks were 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.33) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.40-1.21), respectively. When adjusting for patient-years, the incidence rate ratio for overall infection was 1.01 (95% CI 0.92-1.11). The odds ratio for malignancy was 1.48 (95% CI 0.71-3.09) and 1.26 (95% CI 0.39-4.15) when nonmelanoma skin cancer was excluded. Short duration of follow-up and rarity of malignancies and serious infections are limitations. There is a small increased risk of overall infection with the short-term use of TNF antagonists for psoriasis that may be attributable to differences in follow-up time between treatment and placebo groups. There was no evidence of an increased risk of serious infection and a statistically significant increased risk in cancer was not observed with short-term use of TNF inhibitors.

Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Crohn's Disease: Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials

We performed a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials to evaluate safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for Crohn's disease. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The primary end points were clinical remission for luminal Crohn's disease and fistula closure at > or =2 consecutive visits. Deaths, serious infections, and malignancies were also analyzed by the methods of Peto and Der Simonian and Laird. Fourteen luminal Crohn's disease trials enrolled 3995 patients. In overall analysis, anti-TNF therapy was effective for induction of remission at week 4 (mean difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-16%; P < .001) and maintenance of remission at weeks 20-30 in patients who responded to induction therapy and in patients randomized before induction (mean difference, 23%; 95% CI, 18%-28% and mean difference, 8%; 95% CI, 3%-12%, respectively; P < .001 for all comparisons). Ten studies evaluated anti-TNF for treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease, involving 776 patients. In overall analysis, anti-TNF therapy was effective for fistula closure only in maintenance trials after open-label induction (mean difference, 16%; 95% CI, 8%-25%; P < .001). In 21 studies enrolling 5356 individuals, anti-TNF therapy did not increase the risk of death, malignancy, or serious infection. Infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab are effective in luminal Crohn's disease. Efficacy of anti-TNF agents other than infliximab in treating fistulizing Crohn's disease requires additional investigations. A longer duration of follow-up and a larger number of patients are required to better assess the safety profile of TNF antagonists in Crohn's disease.