Safety Of Same-day Discharge Research Articles

Same Day Discharge after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in Adults 65 Years and Older: An Analysis of the 2015 to 2022 MBSAQIP.

There is increasing interest in same day discharge (SDD) after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Among older adults, the safety of SDD is unclear and, as a result, this age group is often excluded from SDD protocols. We aimed to characterize the safety profile of SDD in adults ≥ 65years. The 2015-2022 MBSAQIP was queried for patients ≥ 65years undergoing primary sleeve gastrectomy or RYGB. Patients were stratified based on postoperative day (POD) of discharge: SDD, POD1, POD2, POD3, and ≥ POD4. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between SDD and 30-day Clavien-Dindo complications and readmissions. We identified 63,486 patients ≥ 65years; the median (IQR) age was 68 (4) years. Overall, 2.12% of patients underwent SDD while the majority (52.8%) were discharged on POD1. From 2015 to 2022, the proportion with SDD increased from 1.15% to 4.33%. Compared to those discharged on later days, patients undergoing SDD had proportionally fewer obesity-associated diseases, including insulin-dependent diabetes (SDD 14.2%, POD1 15.5%, POD2 20.4%, POD3 23.2%, POD4 + 26.1%) and COPD (SDD 3.2%, POD1 4.7%, POD2 5.7%, POD3 7.2%, POD4 + 9.6%) (all p < 0.001). Compared to POD1 discharge, SDD was not significantly associated with any class of Clavien-Dindo complications or 30-day readmissions (all p > 0.05). Though use of SDD after MBS in adults ≥ 65years has increased from 2015 to 2022, it remains an uncommon practice. Those undergoing SDD have fewer obesity-associated diseases and, in this select cohort of older adults, SDD is not associated with worse postoperative morbidity and mortality. Careful patient selection is critical for safe SDD in adults ≥ 65years.

The safety of same-day discharge following percutaneous coronary intervention in regional Australia.

Same-day discharge (SDD) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has proven safe, and global adoption of this strategy has been increasing rapidly. These data are predominantly derived from high-volume, metropolitan centres with a relative paucity of data from regional and remote settings. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a same-day, criteria-led discharge strategy following elective transradial PCI in a regional setting. This is a retrospective, single-centre cohort study. Consecutive outpatients aged ≥18 years presenting for elective transradial invasive coronary angiography between March 2019 and February 2024 were included in the analysis. We report the primary composite outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality and unplanned hospital readmission and compare proportions between those who were discharged on the day of their procedure with those admitted overnight in hospital and discharged the next day. A total of 555 eligible patients were identified, of which 330 (60%) were discharged on the day of their procedure. The composite primary end-point occurred in seven (2%) of the SDD patients and in six (3%) of the overnight admission patients (relative risk = 0.80; 95% confidence interval = 0.27-2.34; P = 0.68). No significant differences were seen in rates of readmission, or in other clinical outcomes assessed, including death, myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular complications or bleeding. In a regional setting, SDD following elective transradial PCI, in select patients, is a safe approach which was not associated with higher rates of unplanned readmission or adverse clinical outcomes.

Extraction Laparotomy for Specimen Retrieval Does Not Alter Same-day Discharge Plans

Study ObjectiveTo evaluate if extraction laparotomy (EL) for intact specimen removal adversely impacted the feasibility or safety of same-day discharge (SDD) in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for confirmed or suspected gynecologic malignancies. DesignRetrospective study SettingSingle institution study PatientsPatients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic malignancy at a single institution, who underwent extraction laparotomy (N=67) and age matched controls (N=134) InterventionsComparing same day discharge rates, complications, readmission and outpatient follow up after between patients requiring extraction laparotomy to those that did not after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Measurements and Main ResultsA total of 1224 patients were identified. Sixty-seven patients underwent EL for specimen extraction. From the remainder, 134 patients were selected as age matched controls. SDD rate was 83% (EL) vs. 87% (no EL) (p=.39). There was no difference in median pain scores (1.8 vs. 1.9 p=.86), length of stay (LOS) (0 days for both) (p=.41), 30-day readmission rate (6% vs. 3%) (p=.45), ED visit (13% vs. 10%) (p=.76) or any patient contact (34% vs. 39%) (p=.53), between the groups. Specimen weight was higher for EL (524g vs 142g, p<.001), as was estimated blood loss (EBL) (104ml vs. 46ml, p<.001), and surgery time was increased by 22 minutes in the EL group (121 min vs. 99 min, p<.001). Patients who underwent EL did require more narcotics in PACU 20.5 vs 12.2 OME p=.033, however this did not translate to increased number of narcotics prescribed at discharge. On logistic regression a higher specimen weight trended to increase the likelihood of admission (OR 1.04 CI 1.01-1.08), however, surgery time, time in PACU, race, BMI, surgery type or need for EL did not predict SDD or need for admission. ConclusionsMinimally invasive surgery patients who require extraction laparotomy can still achieve SDD. Same-day discharge is safe and feasible without increased risk of readmission, pain score, or unscheduled patient contact post-operatively.

Safety and efficacy of same-day discharge for premature ventricular complex ablations.

Patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are generally observed overnight in the hospital given the concern for complications. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) of patients undergoing elective CA of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing elective VA ablation at Ascension St Vincent Hospital from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 was undertaken. Of those, the patients undergoing PVC ablation were divided into SDD and non-SDD. Patients underwent SDD at the discretion of the operator. The primary safety outcome was the 30-day incidence of complications and death. The primary efficacy outcome was procedural success. Among 188 patients who underwent VA ablation, 98 (52.1%) were PVC ablations, and of those, 55 (56.1%) were SDD. There was no difference in age, gender, comorbidities, or ejection fraction between the two groups. Patients that were non-SDD were more likely to be on chronic anticoagulation (P = 0.03), have ablation in the LV (P = 0.04), have retrograde access (P = 0.03), and receive heparin during the procedure (P = 0.01). There were no complications in the SDD group compared with one (2.3%) in the non-SDD group. There was no difference in primary efficacy between the two groups with a 90.9% acute success in the SDD and 88.4% in the non-SDD (P = 0.68). Same-day discharge for CA of PVCs is feasible and could lower healthcare resource utilization without compromising outcomes in this unique population.

The safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation

Abstract Introduction Subcutaneous Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) are now progressively administered as a day-case procedure. While existing data supports the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transvenous ICD implantation, comparable evidence for S-ICDs is not well established. This study addresses this by presenting data from the most extensive population documented in the medical literature. We seek to evaluate the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after S-ICD implantation. Purpose To investigate the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge following S-ICD implantation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted, encompassing data from all patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at our institution between January 2011 to April 2023 (n=240). The cohort was stratified into two groups: those discharged on the same day of the procedure (SD, n=124) and those subject to at least overnight hospital observation (OD, n=116). The medical records were reviewed during this period aiming to identify potential complications. Complications were categorized as device-related complications or inappropriate shock. Specific events, such as inappropriate shocks; lead revision; infection necessitating lead or generator extraction; pocket hematoma requiring drainage, blood transfusion, or prolongation of hospitalization; and other complications related to the lead or generator prompting medical or surgical intervention were documented. An inappropriate shock was defined as one delivered for any rhythm other than ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. Results Among the 240 patients included in the study, 123 were scheduled for a day case procedure, while the remaining 117 underwent S-ICD implantation as in-patients. Notably, 112(91%) out of 123 planned-day patients and 12 in-patients (SD, total n=124) were successfully discharged on the same day. A substantial proportion (84%) of SD group had undergone the procedure for primary prevention. Patients with congenital heart disease were predominantly observed overnight. Defibrillation testing (DFT) is routine in our practice to ensure S-ICD integrity and was conducted in all S-ICD patients unless contraindicated. The success rate of DFT among attempted patients was high, standing at 72% and 78% in the SD and OD groups, respectively. The incidence of device-related complications was comparable between the two groups. The SD group displayed a slightly higher superficial infection rate but the incidence of inappropriate shocks was lower in the SD groups. Conclusion Based on our findings, same-day discharge following S-ICD implantation emerges as an appropriate practice. Our data strongly supports the assertion that same-day discharge in this context is safe and feasible, offering valuable insights into the optimal post-procedural management of S-ICD patients.Table 1ComplicationsTable 2Defibrillation Test

Optimising postoperative care: Same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate. Five years of records were retrospectively analysed. Length of stay categorised patients into Groups 1 (same-day discharge) and 2 (standard-length discharge). Logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for clinicodemographic factors. Student's t-test compared continuous bladder irrigation and catheter dwell times. A total of 459 patients were identified between 2016 and 2021, 280 in Group 1 and 179 in Group 2, with median ages of 71.0 (interquartile range 36-92) and 72.0 (interquartile range 47-101) years (p = 0.067), respectively. Same-day discharge rates notably increased post-2018 (p = 0.025). Median prostate tissue resected in Group 2 was 7.1g (3.4-12.4g) and in Group 1 was 4.9g (2.4-10.2g; p = 0.034). While continuous bladder irrigation >1 hour was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (96.8% versus 27.4%; p = 0.0001), catheter dwell times were comparable (70.1 and 70.8 hours, respectively). Control-adjusted results showed a 40% reduction in emergency department representation odds for Group 1 compared with Group 2 (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.99; p = 0.04). Length of stay was not significantly associated with hospital readmissions (p = 0.11). Continuous bladder irrigation for <1 hour in Group 1 was associated with a reduced emergency department representation (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% confidence interval = 0.197-0.980) but not readmission (odds ratio = 0.413; 95% confidence interval = 0.166-1.104). Same-day discharge post-transurethral resection of the prostate may be a viable and safe option for carefully selected patients.

Same-day discharge after large-bore access in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total coronary occlusions.

Same-day discharge (SDD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) is appealing because of the increased patient comfort. However, data on SDD following large-bore vascular access are scarce. We investigated the feasibility and safety of SDD in patients undergoing large-bore CTO PCI. Between 2013 and 2023, 948 patients were prospectively enrolled in a single-centre CTO registry and underwent CTO PCI. SDD was pursued in all patients. Large-bore access was defined as the use of ≥7 French (Fr) sheaths in ≥1 access site. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for non-SDD. Clinical follow-up was obtained at 30 days. SDD was observed in 62% of patients. Large-bore access was applied in 99% of the cohort. SDD patients were younger and more often male, with lower rates of renal insufficiency and prior coronary artery bypass grafting. Local access site bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 8.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.24-13.87) and vascular access complications (OR 7.23, 95% CI: 1.98-26.32) made hospitalisation more likely, with vascular access complications occurring in 3%. At 30 days, the hospital readmission rate was low in both SDD and non-SDD patients (5% vs 7%; p=non-significant). Finally, SDD was not a predictor for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at follow-up. Same-day discharge can be achieved in the majority of patients undergoing CTO PCI with large-bore (≥7 Fr) access. Similar low hospital readmission and MACE rates between SDD and non-SDD patients at 30 days demonstrate the feasibility and safety of SDD.

Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Joint replacement procedures have traditionally been performed in an inpatient setting to minimize complication rates. There is growing evidence that total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) can safely be performed as an outpatient procedure, with the potential benefits of decreased health care expenses and improved patient satisfaction. Prior studies have not reliably made a distinction between outpatient TAA defined as length of stay <1 day and same-day discharge. The purpose of our study was to compare a large volume of same-day discharge and inpatient TAA for safety and efficacy. Patients undergoing TAA at our US-based institution are part of an institutional review board-approved registry. We queried the registry for TAA performed by the single highest-volume surgeon at our institution between May 2020 and March 2022. Same-day discharge TAA was defined as discharge on the day of the procedure. Patient demographics, baseline clinical variables, concomitant procedures, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Postoperative outcomes were compared after 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Multivariable models were created for comparison with the matched cohort outcome comparison analysis. Our same-day discharge group was younger (median 58 vs 67 years; P < .001), with proportionally fewer females (36.4% vs 51.4%; P = .044) and lower Charlson Comorbidity Indices (median 1 vs 3; P < .001) than the inpatient group. At a median follow-up of 1 year, after matching by age, sex, CCI, and ASA score, there was no difference in complications (P = .788), reoperations (P = .999), revisions (P = .118), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores between the 2 groups. Multivariable analyses performed demonstrated no evidence of association between undergoing same-day discharge TAA vs inpatient TAA and reoperation, revision, complication, or 1-year PROMIS scores (P > .05). In our system of health care, with appropriate patient selection, same-day discharge following TAA can be a safe alternative to inpatient TAA. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Outpatient vs Inpatient Single-Port Robotic Urologic Surgery: Perioperative Outcomes and Complications.

The da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic surgical system has minimized the impact of surgery on patients. Hence, outpatient robotic procedures are being explored to reduce costs and improve patient experience. Here, we evaluate the perioperative outcomes and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) after surgery compared to inpatient procedures using the SP. A total of 374 patients underwent surgery with the da Vinci SP system between January 2019 and February 2023. Surgeries were performed in a single high-volume center. Patients were either managed with a standardized outpatient or inpatient protocol. SDD clinical pathway was implemented in June 2021. Patients were assessed for discharge eligibility based on specific guidelines. Detailed instructions were provided at discharge, and patients were followed postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, complications, time to complication, and readmissions were assessed. Two hundred eight patients underwent outpatient surgery and 166 underwent inpatient surgery (total = 374). Outpatient surgery was not associated with increased postoperative complications and readmission compared to inpatient surgery. Ninety percent and 74.6% of patients experienced no complications in the outpatient and inpatient populations, respectively (P =< .001). Time to first complication was also comparable between the 2 groups (3 days [IQR 1-8] vs 10 days [IQR 4-30] for outpatient vs inpatient; P = .3). The proportion of successful SDDs increased over time, reaching 88% in October 2022. Outpatient surgery using the da Vinci SP is safe and feasible, without increasing postoperative complications compared to standard inpatient surgery.

Safety of Same-Day Discharge after Bariatric Surgery: Retrospective 6-Year North American Analysis.

With increasing implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols and rising demand for inpatient hospital beds accentuated by COVID-19, there has been interest in same-day discharge (SDD) for bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the national trends, safety profile, and risk factors for complications of SDD for minimally invasive bariatric surgery. We analyzed the MBSAQIP database from 2016 to 2021 to characterize trends in SDD for minimally invasive bariatric operation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on preoperative patient characteristics predictive of increased complications associated with SDD. A comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes within 30 days was performed for SDD and admission after 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching for patient demographics and preoperative comorbidities. SDD increased from 2.4% in 2016 to 7.4% in 2021. Major preoperative factors associated with increased complications for SDD included Black race, history of MI, renal insufficiency, deep vein thrombosis, and smoking. SDD for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass had 72% increased risk of postoperative complications compared with sleeve gastrectomy. The overall major complications were lower in SDD cohort vs admission cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, p < 0.01). However, there was a significant increase in deaths within 30 days (OR 2.11, p = 0.01), cardiac arrest (OR 2.73; p < 0.01), and dehydration requiring treatment (OR 1.33; p < 0.01) in SDD cohort compared with admission cohort. Nationally, there has been a rise in SDD for bariatric operation from 2016 to 2021. Matched analysis demonstrates that SDD is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate. Additionally, the risk of complications with SDD is higher for RYGB compared with sleeve gastrectomy. Therefore, further studies are required to appropriately select patients for whom bariatric surgery can be safely performed as an outpatient.

Same-Day Discharge is Safe, Feasible Following Vaginal Hysterectomy with Apical Suspension.

Studies involving minimally invasive hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy have demonstrated safety and feasibility of same-day discharge. There are limited data, however, on same-day discharge outcomes for vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic reconstruction. This study aimed to compare 30 and 90-day surgical outcomes between same-day discharge versus overnight stay following vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension. This retrospective study evaluated surgeries performed over two time periods. Overnight stay was standard between December 2018 and February 2020. Same-day discharge was standard from December 2020 to February 2022. All patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension were included. The primary outcome was to determine if there was an increase in 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and reoperations within 30 days, the previous variables at 90 days, and the rate for successful same-day discharge. A total of 324 patients were analyzed over the 30 months: 149 (46%) in the overnight stay group and 175 (54%) in the same-day discharge group. At 30 days, no difference was found between groups for readmissions (2.7% vs 4.0%, p = 0.56), emergency department visits (14.8% vs 14.9%, p = 1.0), or reoperations (2.0% vs.1.7%, p = 1.0). At 90 days, outcomes were also similar. Same-day discharge as standard practice was successful in 80% of patients. In this retrospective two cohort study, the safety of same-day discharge following vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension was demonstrated with no increased risk of 30 or 90-day readmissions, emergency visits, or reoperation rates. The majority (80%) of patients were discharged on the day of surgery, suggesting feasibility of this model.

Review of efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Review of efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Same-Day Discharge After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedures

Information is evolving on the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures. This single-centre retrospective study evaluated the feasibility of SDD and reported on the 30-day rehospitalization rate in patients discharged same-day compared with those admitted overnight after LAAO. Key findings of this study included more than 85% of patients with LAAO were safely discharged same-day; the rate of postdischarge rehospitalization was similar in SDD patients and those admitted overnight; and approximately 1 in 10 patients who had LAAO procedures were rehospitalized within 30 days postprocedure.

Association Between Same-Day Discharge Shoulder Arthroplasty and Risk of Adverse Events in Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification ≥ 3: A Cohort Study.

Same-day discharge for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is well-supported in the literature, however, most studies have focused on healthier patients. Indications for same-day discharge SA have expanded to include patients with more comorbidities, but safety of same-day discharge in this population remains unknown. We sought to compare outcomes following same-day discharge versus inpatient SA in a cohort of patients considered higher-risk for adverse events, defined as an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of ≥3. Data from a US-based healthcare system's SA registry were utilized to conduct a retrospective cohort study. All patients with an ASA classification of ≥3 who underwent primary elective anatomic or reverse SA in a hospital from 2018-2020 were included. The exposure of interest was in-hospital length of stay: same-day discharge versus ≥1-night hospital inpatient stay. The likelihood of 90-day post-discharge events, including emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, cardiac complication, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and mortality, was evaluated using propensity score-weighted logistic regression with noninferiority testing using a margin of 1.10. The cohort included a total of 1,814 SA patients, of whom 1,005 (55.4%) had same-day discharge. In propensity score-weighted models, same-day discharge was not inferior to an inpatient stay SA regarding 90-day readmission (odds ratio [OR]=0.64, one-sided 95% upper bound [UB]=0.89) and overall complications (OR=0.67, 95% UB=1.00). We lacked evidence in support of non-inferiority for 90-day ED visit (OR=0.96, 95% UB=1.18), cardiac event (OR=0.68, 95% UB=1.11), or VTE (OR=0.91, 95% UB=2.15). Infections, revisions for instability, and mortality were too rare to evaluate using regression analysis. In a cohort of over 1,800 patients with an ASA of ≥3, we found same-day discharge SA did not increase the likelihood of ED visits, readmissions, or complications compared with an inpatient stay and same-day discharge was not inferior to an inpatient stay with regard to readmissions and overall complications. These findings suggest that it is possible to expand indications for same-day discharge SA in the hospital setting.

TCT-602 Feasibility and Safety of Same Day Discharge for Patent Forman Ovale Closures Using Intracardiac Echo and Moderate Sedation

TCT-602 Feasibility and Safety of Same Day Discharge for Patent Forman Ovale Closures Using Intracardiac Echo and Moderate Sedation

TCT-495 Economic Impact and Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Selected Patients (EASY-SDD)

TCT-495 Economic Impact and Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Selected Patients (EASY-SDD)

Safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia among patients with morbid obesity (1187)

Safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia among patients with morbid obesity (1187)

Safety of same-day discharge after lead extraction procedures

Same-day discharge (SDD) after cardiovascular procedures is rapidly gaining ground. We sought to evaluate the safety of SDD after transvenous lead extraction (TLE). We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent elective TLE between January 2020 and October 2021 at our institution. The primary outcome was SDD, and major procedural complications and readmissions within 30 days of the procedure were secondary outcomes. In this analysis of 111 patients who underwent elective TLE, 80 patients (72%) were discharged on the same day (SDD group) while 31 patients (28%) stayed overnight (overnight group). Lead malfunction was the most common indication for TLE in both groups. Patients in the overnight group were more likely to have a lead dwell time of ≤10 years than those in the SDD group (38.7% vs 20% of all leads in each group; P = .042), have laser sheaths used for extraction and a higher number of leads extracted. No major complications were reported in both groups. In a multivariate analysis, lower body mass index and the use of laser sheath during TLE were predictors of overnight stay. Patients who underwent a procedure using advanced extraction techniques were 3.5 times more likely to stay overnight (95% confidence interval 1.27-9.78; P=.016). In appropriately selected patients undergoing elective lead extraction, SDD is feasible and safe. Higher body mass index, fewer extracted leads, shorter lead dwell times (<10 years), and less frequent use of laser-powered extraction sheaths were associated with an increased likelihood of SDD.

Effectiveness and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Moderate Conscious Sedation: One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes

Effectiveness and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Moderate Conscious Sedation: One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes