Safety Of Ranolazine Research Articles

Real-World Data from the Use of Ranolazine in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: The RANGER Study.

Background: Although ranolazine has been available for years as a second-line treatment to reduce angina attacks in patients with stable angina pectoris, real-world data on the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of ranolazine are limited. Methods: A non-interventional, prospective study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of ranolazine. Patients eligible for enrolment had a baseline assessment between one and fourteen days after initiating ranolazine for the first time and a follow-up visit three months later. The primary endpoints comprised the weekly frequency of angina attacks, total adverse events, and ranolazine discontinuation rate. The secondary endpoints included the use of short-acting nitrates, changes on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification score and quality of life scale score (QoL). Results: In total, 1101 patients were enrolled at 214 sites. Mean weekly angina attacks were reduced from 3.6 ± 2.9 to 0.4 ± 0.9 (p < 0.0001) and the mean weekly consumption of short-acting nitrates decreased by 1.7 ± 2.2 (p < 0.0001). CCS class and QoL were also improved (p < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 11 (1%) patients in total, while 2 of them (0.2%) were characterised as serious. Treatment was discontinued for various reasons in 23 patients (2.1%) after the follow-up period. Ranolazine treatment was equally effective in all subgroups tested, with larger benefits observed in patients with more frequent angina and CCS angina class III and IV. Up-titration of ranolazine during the study improved the outcomes. Conclusions: Ranolazine was well tolerated and effectively reduced angina attacks, with simultaneous improvement of the CCS class and QoL score in patients with stable angina.

The efficacy of ranolazine in improving glycemic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Ranolazine is an anti-anginal drug that mediates its effects by inhibition of cardiac late sodium current. Although it is not indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), several clinical trials have shown that ranolazine was associated with a reduction in HbA1c. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM. A total of five randomized controlled trials involving 2,680 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis showed that ranolazine may improve glycemic control with a modest decrease in HbA1c and FBS. The difference in HbA1c was -0.38% (95% CI -0.59 to -0.17), favoring ranolazine. Sensitivity analysis showed a difference of HbA1c of -0.49% (CI -0.67, -0.31), still favoring the ranolazine group. There was also a statistically significant difference in fasting glucagon, favoring the ranolazine group (-2.70 pg/ml: 95% CI -5.24 to -0.16). The risk of hypoglycemia with ranolazine was comparable with placebo (RR 1.27 95% CI 0.84 to 1.91). Overall, ranolazine appears to be a safe and effective option for improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM, with a modest decrease in HbA1c and FBS, and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to placebo. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of ranolazine in this patient population.

Safety and efficacy of ranolazine in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Real-world experience in a National Referral Center

ObjectivesWe assessed the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in real-world patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). BackgroundRanolazine is an anti-anginal drug that inhibits the late phase of the inward sodium current. In a small prospective trial, ranolazine reduced the arrhythmic burden and improved biomarker profile in HCM patients. However, systematic reports reflecting real-world use in this setting are lacking. MethodsChanges in clinical and instrumental features, symptoms and arrhythmic burden were evaluated in 119 patients with HCM before and during treatment with ranolazine at a national referral centre for HCM. ResultsPatients were treated with ranolazine for 2 [1–4] years; 83 (70%) achieved a dosage ≥1000 mg per day. Treatment interruption was necessary in 24 patients (20%) due to side effects (n = 10, 8%) or disopyramide initiation (n = 8, 7%). Seventy patients (59%) were treated with ranolazine for relief of angina. Among them, 51 (73%) had total symptomatic relief and 47 patients (67%) showed ≥2 Canadian Cardiovascular society (CCS) angina grade improvement. Sixteen patients (13%) were treated for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias, including 4 with a clear ischemic trigger, who experienced no further arrhythmic episodes while on ranolazine. Finally, 33 patients (28%) were treated for heart failure associated with severe diastolic dysfunction: no symptomatic benefit could be observed in this group. ConclusionRanolazine was safe and well tolerated in patients with HCM. The use of ranolazine may be considered in patients with HCM and microvascular angina.

Real-world data from the use of ranolazine in patients with stable angina pectoris: the RANGER study

Abstract Background Although ranolazine is available since years as a second-line treatment to reduce angina attacks in patients with stable angina pectoris, real-world data on effectiveness, tolerability and safety of ranolazine are limited. Methods A non-interventional, prospective study conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of ranolazine. Patients eligible for enrolment had a baseline assessment between one and fourteen days after initiating ranolazine for the first time and a follow-up visit three months later. Primary endpoints comprised the weekly frequency of angina attacks, total adverse events and ranolazine discontinuation rate. Secondary endpoints included the use of short-acting nitrates, changes on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification score and quality of life scale score (QoL). Results In total, 1,101 patients were enrolled in 214 sites. Mean weekly angina attacks were reduced from 3.6±2.9 to 0.4±0.9 (p&amp;lt;0.0001) and the mean weekly consumption of short-acting nitrates decreased by 1.7±2.2 (p&amp;lt;0.0001). CCS class and QoL were also improved (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 11 (1%) patients totally, while 2 of them (0.2%) were characterized as serious. Treatment was discontinued for any reason in 23 patients (2.1%) after the follow-up period. Ranolazine treatment was equally effective in all subgroups tested, with larger benefits observed in patients with more frequent angina and CCS angina class III and IV. Up-titration of ranolazine during the study improved the outcomes. Conclusion Ranolazine was well-tolerated and effectively reduced angina attacks with simultaneous improvement of CCS class and QoL score in patients with stable angina. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): The study was sponsored by Menarini Hellas. The study sponsor was involved in the study concept and design and in the interpretation of the data included in this publication, but not in the data collection and analysis. Menarini Hellas also funded the medical writing support for this publication.

Role of Ranolazine in the Prevention and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Background: Ranolazine has the potential to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) and plays a role in rhythm control strategy for atrial fibrillation in various clinical settings. However, data on the use of ranolazine in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction are limited. The aims of this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials are to investigate the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in AF patients with LV systolic dysfunction. PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched until July 2020. The efficacy outcomes included the incidence of new-onset AF, the rate of sinus rhythm restoration, and the time until sinus rhythm restoration. Safety endpoints were at death, and any adverse events were reported in the enrolled studies. We initially identified 204 studies and finally retrieved 5 RCTs. Three studies were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Among AF patients with LV systolic dysfunction, our meta-analysis showed that the combination of ranolazine to amiodarone significantly increased the sinus rhythm restoration rate compared to amiodarone alone (risk ratio (RR) 2.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48–3.32). Moreover, the time to sinus rhythm restoration was 2.46 h shorter in the ranolazine added to amiodarone group (95% CI: 2.27–2.64). No significant adverse events and proarrhythmias in the ranolazine group were identified. In conclusion, in AF patients with LV systolic dysfunction, ranolazine as an add-on therapy to amiodarone potentiates and accelerates the conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Moreover, ranolazine shows good safety profiles. Further studies to investigate the effectiveness of ranolazine in the prevention of new-onset AF among patients with LV systolic dysfunction are needed.

Вплив ранолазину на перебіг ішемічної хвороби серця після черезшкірного коронарного втручання

Optimization of antiischemic therapy is necessary in many patients with stable forms of coronary heart disease after or during revascularization. From the standpoint of current guidelines, the addition of second-line drugs, in particular ranolazine, to beta-blockers and/or calcium antagonists is considered during anginal attacks due to incomplete revascularization, to prevent myocardial damage during percutaneous coronary interventions, and in cases when revascularization is not possible. The results of many clinical studies have proven the antiischemic effect and safety of ranolazine after coronary artery stenting. Potential advantages of ranolazine compared with other second-line antianginal drugs are the absence of significant changes in hemodynamic parameters, good tolerability and proven antiarrhythmic effects. Key words: chronic ischemic heart disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, ranolazine.

Ranolazine: Electrophysiologic Effect, Efficacy, and Safety in Patients with Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Ranolazine is currently approved as an antianginal agent in patients with chronic angina (class IIA). Ranolazine exhibits antiarrhythmic effects that are related to its multichannel blocking effect, predominantly inhibition of late sodium (late INa) current and the rapid potassium rectifier current (IKr), as well as ICa, late ICa, and INa-Ca. It also suppresses the early and delayed after depolarizations. Ranolazine is effective in the suppression of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (off-label use) without significant proarrhythmic effect. Currently, ongoing trials are evaluating the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in patients with cardiac arrhythmias; preliminary results suggest that ranolazine, when used alone or in combination with dronedarone, is safe and effective in reducing atrial fibrillation. Ranolazine is not currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an antiarrhythmic agent.

Phase I safety study of ranolazine in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) causes right ventricular ischemia, dysfunction, and failure. PAH patients may benefit from antianginal agents based on a shared pathophysiology with left ventricular ischemia. A single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (1∶1) to assess the acute vasoreactivity and safety of ranolazine in PAH was conducted. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were drawn during hemodynamic measurements at 0, 60, 90, 120, 240, and 360 minutes from a Swan-Ganz catheter. All patients received 500-mg doses, uptitrated to 1,000 mg at week 4, monthly evaluations, and a complete objective assessment after 12 weeks, followed by an open-label extension. Thirteen patients were randomized and 12 enrolled (6 ranolazine, 6 placebo). All patients completed the acute phase; 10 completed the 12-week study. There were no acute changes in invasive hemodynamics. At 12 weeks ranolazine was well tolerated. Only 1 of the 5 patients on ranolazine had a serum concentration considered to be in the therapeutic range. Two serious adverse events required early withdrawal (both in the ranolazine group); gastrointestinal complaints were the most common adverse event. Efficacy measures did not demonstrate any differences between treatment groups. During the open-label trial, 2 additional patients reached a therapeutic concentration. Ranolazine in PAH appears safe, without acute hemodynamic effects after a 500-mg dose. Ranolazine administrated to PAH patients receiving background PAH therapies did not consistently reach therapeutic levels. Future studies should first perform PK analysis in PAH patients receiving PAH therapies and explore the safety and tolerability of the higher doses perhaps necessary to achieve therapeutic levels in PAH patients. ( Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01757808.).

Efficacy and Safety of Ranolazine in Patients With Chronic Stable Angina

Chronic stable angina (CSA) impairs patient quality of life, is associated with increased patient mortality, and is a prominent symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD), the latter being prevalent worldwide in patients. Currently, therapeutic options for patients with CSA include β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and ranolazine. Ranolazine is a first-in-class piperazine derivative that inhibits the late inward sodium current in cardiac cells and is considered an effective and safe option for treating patients with CSA. As with any first-in-class agent, it is important for the practitioner to be familiar with the safety profile of the drug. Therefore, the objective of our article is to review safety data on the use of ranolazine in patients with CSA. Clinical data show that ranolazine is well tolerated: major treatment-associated adverse events include dizziness, nausea, headache, and constipation. Ranolazine treatment is also associated with QTc-interval prolongation; however, QTc-interval prolongation with ranolazine does not appear to have clinical consequences–in fact, several studies suggest that ranolazine therapy may have an antiarrhythmic effect in patients. Notably, ranolazine is hemodynamically neutral in that it exerts its antianginal effect without significantly impacting patient heart rate or blood pressure. In addition, small decreases in glycosylated hemoglobin levels have been seen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Overall, ranolazine (in doses of 500 mg and 1000 mg, twice daily) is a safe and effective option for monotherapy or add-on therapy to reduce anginal symptoms in patients with CSA.

Impact of Ranolazine on Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Refractory Angina Pectoris

Ranolazine is a novel antianginal medication approved for the treatment of chronic angina. There are only limited data concerning the efficacy of ranolazine in reducing healthcare resource utilization in patients with refractory angina pectoris. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in refractory angina pectoris. In addition, the impact of ranolazine on healthcare resource utilization was assessed. Consecutive patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with ranolazine at two cardiology practices in the state of Nebraska were included in this analysis. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class and frequency and type of healthcare resource consumption were determined during the 12 months prior to and the 12 months after initiation of ranolazine. A total of 150 pts (64% men) with a mean age of 66±12 years were included in this analysis. All patients had previously undergone coronary revascularization. Nitrates, β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers), and calcium antagonists (calcium channel blockers) were being used in 83, 97, and 75% of patients, respectively. During ranolazine treatment, a significant improvement in CCS angina class was observed, with 23 patients improving by one class and no patient experiencing a deterioration in functional class (p=0.025). A total of 53 side effects occurred in 28 (19%) patients receiving ranolazine. Of those patients with side effects, four required dose reduction and seven required drug discontinuation. The frequency of clinic visits and emergency room visits was lower during ranolazine treatment, but the differences in frequency were not significant. The number of patients hospitalized and the number of hospitalizations were significantly lower during ranolazine therapy than in the pre-ranolazine study period (p=0.002). Ranolazine improved the CCS angina class and reduced hospitalizations over a 12-month follow-up period in a group of patients with difficult-to-treat refractory angina pectoris.

Pharmacology at Work for Cardio-Oncology: Ranolazine to Treat Early Cardiotoxicity Induced by Antitumor Drugs

Antitumor drugs may cause asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction that introduces a lifetime risk of heart failure or myocardial infarction. Cardio-oncology is the discipline committed to the cardiac surveillance and management of cancer patients and survivors; however, cardio-oncology teams do not always attempt to treat early diastolic dysfunction. Common cardiovascular drugs, such as β blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or others, would be of uncertain efficacy in diastolic dysfunction. This perspective describes the potential value of ranolazine, an antianginal drug that improves myocardial perfusion by relieving diastolic wall tension and dysfunction. Ranolazine acts by inhibiting the late inward sodium current, and pharmacological reasonings anticipate that antitumor anthracyclines and nonanthracycline chemotherapeutics might well induce anomalous activation of this current. These notions formed the rationale for a clinical study of the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in cancer patients. This study was not designed to demonstrate that ranolazine reduced the lifetime risk of cardiac events; it was designed as a short term proof-of-concept study that probed the following hypotheses: 1) asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction could be detected a few days after patients completed antitumor therapy, and 2) ranolazine was active and safe in relieving echocardiographic and/or biohumoral indices of diastolic dysfunction, measured at 5 weeks or 6 months of ranolazine administration. These facts illustrate the translational value of pharmacology, which goes from identifying therapeutic opportunities to validating hypotheses in clinical settings. Pharmacology is a key to the success of cardio-oncology.

Ranolazine: an antianginal drug with antiarrhythmic properties

Ranolazine is an agent approved for the symptomatic treatment of chronic stable angina that inhibits the late inward sodium current (INaL). INaL amplitude is increased under several pathological conditions, including increased oxidative stress, myocardial ischemia, cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure, long-QT syndrome variant 3 and atrial fibrillation. Experimental and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that ranolazine may represent a new therapeutic strategy in the treatment of a broad spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias. This article reviews the role of the INaL and provides an update on experimental and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of ranolazine across a broad spectrum of arrhythmias.

Efficacy of Ranolazine in Patients With Chronic Angina: Observations From the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled MERLIN–TIMI (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes) 36 Trial

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in a larger and more diverse group of patients with angina than previously studied. Ranolazine is an antianginal shown to reduce angina and improve exercise performance in selected patients with early-positive exercise testing and those with frequent angina. We investigated the antianginal effects of ranolazine in the subgroup of patients with prior chronic angina (n = 3,565, 54%) enrolled in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled MERLIN-TIMI (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes) 36 trial of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Follow-up was a median of 350 days. Patients with prior angina received evidence-based therapy (95% aspirin, 78% statins, 89% beta-blockers, average 2.9 antianginal agents). The primary end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia) was less frequent with ranolazine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.97; p = 0.017), due entirely to a significant reduction in recurrent ischemia (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.91; p = 0.002). Ranolazine also reduced worsening angina (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.00; p = 0.048) and intensification of antianginal therapy (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.92, p = 0.005). Exercise duration at 8 months was greater with ranolazine (514 s vs. 482 s, p = 0.002). Cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction did not differ between treatment groups (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.16; p = 0.71). Symptomatic documented arrhythmias (2.9% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.92) and total mortality (6.2% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.96) were similar with ranolazine or placebo. In this largest study of ranolazine in patients with established coronary artery disease, ranolazine was effective in reducing angina with favorable safety in a substantially broader group of patients with angina than previously studied. (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT00099788).

Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (MERLIN TIMI-36) study

Ranolazine is a piperazine derivative believed to reduce anginal symptoms by preventing ischemia-mediated sodium and calcium overload in myocardial cells through inhibition of the late sodium current (late INa). Three small studies demonstrated the antianginal efficacy of ranolazine alone and in combination with βblockers or calcium channel blockers on conventional end points such as total exercise duration and time to ischemia/angina on a treadmill; however, questions of safety related to QT prolongation, efficacy in women and potential utility in higher risk populations remained. Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (MERLIN-TIMI) 36 was a large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of ranolazine initiated acutely and continued as chronic therapy following a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome event. A total of 6560 patients were randomized 1:1 to ranolazine or placebo; the primary efficacy end point of the trial was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischemia. The key safety end points were death from any cause and symptomatic documented arrhythmia. Although statistically significant differences between the ranolazine and placebo groups were not reached in the primary efficacy analysis or in the major secondary outcome end point analyses (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or severe recurrent ischemia), the individual component of recurrent ischemia was significantly reduced by ranolazine, and ranolazine was demonstrated to be safe.

Effects of Ranolazine on Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes&lt;SUBTITLE&gt;The MERLIN-TIMI 36 Randomized Trial&lt;/SUBTITLE&gt;

Ranolazine is a novel antianginal agent that reduces ischemia in patients with chronic angina but has not been studied in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). To determine the efficacy and safety of ranolazine during long-term treatment of patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial of 6560 patients within 48 hours of ischemic symptoms who were treated with ranolazine (initiated intravenously and followed by oral ranolazine extended-release 1000 mg twice daily, n = 3279) or matching placebo (n = 3281), and followed up for a median of 348 days in the Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (MERLIN)-TIMI 36 trial between October 8, 2004, and February 14, 2007. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or recurrent ischemia through the end of study. The major safety end points were death from any cause and symptomatic documented arrhythmia. The primary end point occurred in 696 patients (21.8%) in the ranolazine group and 753 patients (23.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.02; P = .11). The major secondary end point (cardiovascular death, MI, or severe recurrent ischemia) occurred in 602 patients (18.7%) in the ranolazine group and 625 (19.2%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-1.08; P = .50). Cardiovascular death or MI occurred in 338 patients (10.4%) allocated to ranolazine and 343 patients (10.5%) allocated to placebo (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; P = .87). Recurrent ischemia was reduced in the ranolazine group (430 [13.9%]) compared with the placebo group (494 [16.1%]; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; P = .03). QTc prolongation requiring a reduction in the dose of intravenous drug occurred in 31 patients (0.9%) receiving ranolazine compared with 10 patients (0.3%) receiving placebo. Symptomatic documented arrhythmias did not differ between the ranolazine (99 [3.0%]) and placebo (102 [3.1%]) groups (P = .84). No difference in total mortality was observed with ranolazine compared with placebo (172 vs 175; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.80-1.22; P = .91). The addition of ranolazine to standard treatment for ACS was not effective in reducing major cardiovascular events. Ranolazine did not adversely affect the risk of all-cause death or symptomatic documented arrhythmia. Our findings provide support for the safety and efficacy of ranolazine as antianginal therapy. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00099788.

Evaluation of a novel anti-ischemic agent in acute coronary syndromes: Design and rationale for the Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (MERLIN)-TIMI 36 trial

Despite advances in antithrombotic therapies and invasive technology, the risk of recurrent ischemic complications in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs) remains substantial. Ranolazine is a novel agent that inhibits the late sodium current thereby reducing cellular sodium and calcium overload and has been shown to reduce ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina. MERLIN-TIMI 36 is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranolazine during long-term treatment of patients with NSTE-ACS receiving standard therapy (N = 6500). Eligible patients are randomized 1:1 to ranolazine or matched placebo, initiated as 200 mg intravenously over 1 hour, followed by an 80-mg/h infusion (40 mg/h for patients with severe renal insufficiency) for up to 96 hours and oral ranolazine ER 1000 mg BID or matched placebo until the end of study. The primary end point is the time to first occurrence of any element of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischemia. Secondary end points include ischemia on Holter monitoring, hospitalization for new or worsening heart failure, quality of life measures, and exercise performance. The evaluation of long-term safety will include death from any cause and symptomatic documented arrhythmia. Recruitment began in October 2004. The trial will continue until 730 major cardiovascular events and 310 deaths are recorded with expected completion in 24 to 28 months. MERLIN-TIMI 36 will evaluate the role of ranolazine in the acute and chronic management of patients presenting with NSTE-ACS.

The ranolazine clinical experience

The new anti-anginal agent ranolazine has a different mode of action from existing drugs such as beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates, which act by decreasing indices of cardiac work. This article presents the principal results of clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in chronic angina pectoris.