Safety Of Platelet-rich Plasma Research Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Intra-articular Injections in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Intra-articular Injections in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

The Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Treating Sports Injuries

Introduction: Sports injuries are a significant health problem for both professional and recreational athletes. Standard treatment methods, including physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and surgical interventions, often fall short in cases of severe soft tissue damage. This has led to a growing interest in alternative therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In recent years, there has been growing interest in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy due to its potential regenerative properties. PRP is increasingly used in the treatment of sports injuries, with the aim of accelerating tissue regeneration and facilitating a return to full physical fitness. This paper attempts to analyze available scientific studies to assess the effectiveness of PRP in the treatment of sports injuries. Purpose of the work: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in treating sports-related muscle, tendon, ligament, and joint injuries, and to compare its efficacy with other established treatment modalities, such as physiotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Results: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has been shown to be highly effective in treating sports injuries, particularly muscle and tendon injuries. PRP accelerates tissue regeneration and shortens the time to return to physical activity, but the effectiveness of the therapy depends on the proper preparation protocol and individual patient characteristics. Compared to other treatment methods, PRP has a favorable safety profile and a lower risk of complications. Despite promising results, further studies are needed to better determine the long-term effectiveness and optimal conditions for using this therapy.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-articular Injections in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disorder that causes significant pain and functional limitations. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has gained considerable attention in recent years in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. In this narrative review, we aim to investigate the role of intra-articular PRP injections in the treatment of knee and hip OA. The review also discusses different classifications of PRP based on composition. Furthermore, this narrative review also identified various limitations of PRP therapy in OA. PRP is classified into different types based on cell content and fibrin architecture, including pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP), leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP),pure platelet-rich fibrin (P-PRF), and leukocyte- andplatelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF).Various clinical trials have shown that PRP is an effective option for the treatment of knee and hip OA. However, the superiority of PRP over hyaluronic acid has been reported inconsistently. This variability can be attributed to PRP preparation techniques. The safety profiles of PRP are generally favorable and the adverse effects are generally mild in nature. Although there is sufficient evidence in support of PRP in the treatment of OA, the long-term effects of PRP have not been reported. Further studies should focus on longer follow-up periods to identify the efficacy and safety of PRP in treating knee OA. There is also a need for standardization of PRP preparations in OA management.

Use of growth factor concentrate using derma roller in treatment of androgenetic alopecia: A literature review

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a common cause of hair loss in both men and women. Recent advances in regenerative medicine have led to the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with micro-needling as a potential treatment for AGA. However, the clinical effectiveness of this combination therapy remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with micro-needling for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia through a systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical studies. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 2024. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that assessed hair density, hair thickness, or patient satisfaction after treatment with PRP and micro-needling. Data were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. A total of 12 studies involving 546 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of PRP and micro-needling significantly increased hair density (mean difference: 18.9 hairs/cm², 95% CI: 15.3-22.5, p < 0.001) and hair thickness (mean difference: 0.4 mm, 95% CI: 0.3-0.5, p < 0.01) compared to controls. Patient satisfaction was also higher in the treatment group. The most commonly reported adverse effects were mild scalp irritation and transient erythema, with no serious adverse events. Moderate heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I² = 42%). The combination of PRP and micro-needling is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for androgenetic alopecia, resulting in significant improvements in hair density and thickness. Further large-scale, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings and standardize treatment protocols.

Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Management of Non-obstructive Azoospermia.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common cause of infertility in males, which is characterized by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate, resulting from impaired spermatogenesis. The primary therapeutic approaches for the management of NOA include testicular sperm extraction, varicocelectomy in case of clinical varicoceles, and hormonal manipulation. While traditional treatments are found to have a limited role in the management of NOA, recent studies have explored the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a safer and promising therapeutic option. Autologous PRP preparations are derived from the patient's blood and comprise growth factors and cytokines, promoting tissue repair and regeneration. PRP has a wide range of applications in the medical field, including managing infertility in males and females. This literature review aimed to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of PRP in the management of NOA. After a thorough review of relevant data from observational and experimental studies, the findings of this study suggested that PRP may positively influence spermatogenesis, sperm quality, DNA integrity, and sperm retrieval during assisted reproductive procedures. Further research is needed to establish the optimal PRP preparation, administration method, and long-term benefits. The newer studies shall include a diverse patient population and employ long-term follow-up to assess the durability of any positive effects of PRP treatment. The growing body of evidence regarding the therapeutic potential for NOA in humans offers greater opportunities for men seeking fertility treatment, informing clinical practice, and optimizing the use of PRP.

The clinical efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma on frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical efficacy (pain, function, quality of life) and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of frozen shoulder through meta-analysis, and provide evidence-based medical evidence for the effectiveness of PRP in the treatment of frozen shoulder.MethodsA search was conducted on international databases (Pubmed, Web of science, Embase) and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP) to search the clinical studies on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in treating frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis/periarthritis/50 shoulder) and their corresponding references published from inception until January 2024. Thoroughly excluded literature not meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria, extracted relevant data from the literature, and input it into RevMan5.4 for meta-analysis.ResultsThis study ultimately included 14 RCTs, with a total of 1024 patients. The results showed that PRP has significant advantages compared with control groups in VAS (mean difference (MD) =-0.38, 95% confidence interval(CI)(-0.73, -0.03), P = 0.03), UCLA (MD = 3.31, 95% CI (1.02,5.60),P = 0.005), DASH (MD = -4.94,95% CI (-9.34, -0.53),P = 0.03), SPADI (SPADI Total: MD =-16.87, 95% CI (-22.84, -10.91), P < 0.00001; SPADI Pain: MD =-5.38, 95% CI (-7.80, -2.97), P < 0.0001; SPADI Disability: MD =-11.00, 95% CI (-13.61,-8.39), P < 0.00001), and the active and passive Range of Motion (active flexion: MD = 12.70, 95% CI (7.44, 17.95), P < 0.00001; passive flexion: MD = 9.47, 95% CI(3.80, 15.14), P = 0.001; active extension: MD = 3.45, 95% CI(2.39, 4.50), P < 0.00001; active abduction: MD = 13.54, 95% CI(8.42, 18.67), P < 0.00001; passive abduction: MD = 14.26, 95% CI (5.97, 22.56), P = 0.0008; active internal rotation: MD = 5.16, 95% CI (1.84, 8.48), P = 0.002; passive internal rotation: MD = 3.65, 95% CI(1.15, 6.15), P = 0.004; active external rotation: MD = 10.50, 95% CI(5.47, 15.53), P < 0.0001; passive external rotation: MD = 6.00, 95% CI (1.82, 10.19), P = 0.005) except passive extension (MD = 2.25, 95% CI (-0.77, 5.28), P = 0.14). In terms of safety, most studies reported no adverse effects, and only one study reported common complications of joint puncture such as swelling and pain after treatment in both PRP and control groups. Previous studies have shown a risk of osteonecrosis caused by corticosteroids. Therefore, the safety of PRP treatment is more reliable.ConclusionThe results showed that PRP was more durable and safer than corticosteroids and other control groups in the treatment of frozen shoulder.Study DesignSystematic review.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022359444, date of registration: 22-09-2022.

The potency and safety of platelet-rich plasma and its therapy protocol for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract* Background Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a novel treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) that is considered to be a cost-effective option. It has demonstrated positive outcomes and minimal adverse effects. By injecting PRP into the intracavernous tissue, it has the potential to promote angiogenesis and neuroregeneration, leading to a potential permanent improvement in erectile performance. The potency and safety as well as the variety of PRP administration protocols in the treatment of ED are the objectives of this paper. Method Using certain terms, a systematic search was done on three different databases: Science Directs, Scielo, and PubMed. Papers about PRP therapy for EDs within the last decade, be randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and be original studies with freely available full-text content were included in this study. This article omitted letters to the editor, reviews, and editorials regarding PRP and ED. Results Three RCT were included in this studies. The improvement is observed at one month, three months, and six months after the treatment, compared to the baseline. PRP group participants met the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) at a higher percentage than those in the placebo group at both one month and six months. Injection of PRP leads to a superior enhancement in the IIEF-EF score, compared to a placebo, in patients suffering from ED at one month, three months, six months. Conclusion PRP is a proven therapeutic technique that has been shown to greatly enhance ED. Yet, to establish uniform guidelines for PRP in treating erectile dysfunction, further investigation into PRP, particularly in protocol development, is imperative.

Platelets as Regenerative Cells, Hundreds of Opportunities in Sight

&lt;strong&gt;Platelets were the last to be discovered of&lt;/strong&gt; the three formed blood elements. Several scientists have been interested in them, recognizing them as cells other than leukocytes and erythrocytes. Its job in hemostasis and thrombosis is currently known. Platelets contain growth factors and secrete cytokines, which have roles in inflammation and tissue regeneration processes. This is why platelet concentrates have been widely used in regenerative medicine, an emerging field that involves biomolecules, cells, and scaffolds. Due to their chemotactic, angiogenic, immunomodulatory, and cell differentiation-generating properties, platelets have been used to promote the regeneration of tissues such as bones, tendons, ligaments, and wounds. The efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have been demonstrated in various medical scenarios. However, it is essential to implement standardized protocols for each population's conditions and conduct clinical studies based on the available evidence. It must be considered that, as a biological product, the number of platelets used, the number of growth factors, and the way of application will lead to results that will depend on each patient.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in treating female hair loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hair loss profoundly affects women's physical appearance and psychological health. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has gained attention as a potential treatment for female hair loss. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in treating different forms of female hair loss. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2000 to May 2024. The focus was on randomized controlled trials investigating PRP treatment for various types of hair loss in women. The research protocol is registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024556190). The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2). A total of 21 studies comprising 628 participants were included in the analysis. PRP treatment was found to significantly enhance hair density and thickness. Additionally, there was a significant reduction in the number of hairs pulled in the PRP group. Adverse effects were generally mild and transient, with no notable difference in pain or discomfort between the PRP and control groups (risk ratio: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87-1.18). PRP therapy effectively enhances hair density and thickness in women with hair loss, with a favorable safety profile. However, the effects of PRP on hair density and thickness vary with dosage, injection duration, and ethnicity, indicating the need for tailored treatment protocols.

Platelet-rich plasma and plasma rich in growth factors in extra-oral wound care.

This narrative review evaluates the existing literature on the clinical efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGFs) in extra-oral wound care, considering their potential benefits and drawbacks. The review specifically focuses on the impact of these treatments on patients' quality of life, pain management, treatment costs, recurrence rates, and potential complications. Given the extensive literature and diverse range of extra-oral wound types in which these autologous platelet concentrates have been applied, this narrative review focuses on the most frequently described wound types, including diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, surgical wounds, and burns. The use of PRP has been reported in various medical specialties, with a low risk of adverse events. While there is a growing interest in the use of PRGF with promising results, the available literature on this topic is still limited. Only a few studies evaluated patients' perception of the treatment and the relationship between treatment costs and clinical outcomes. Data on recurrence rates and complications also vary across studies. In conclusion, PRP and PRGF show promise as alternatives or as adjunctive therapies to conventional treatments for various extra-oral wounds and ulcers, leading to reduced wound size and accelerated healing time but should be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the type and severity of the wound.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimedto evaluate whether a combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) is more effective and safer than injection alone for treating KOA. MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for articles published until January 2024, and gray literature and bibliographic references were searched. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared pain, functional outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) associated with PRP + HA therapy vs. PRP or HA treatments. Two independent researchers extracted the pertinent data and evaluated the methodological quality following the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes were pain, functional outcomes, and AEs. A fixed-effects model was used for data analysis in cases with low heterogeneity (P > 0.10 and I2 < 50%). Otherwise, a random effects model was used. Ten RCTs involving 943 patients were included in the analysis. The statistical findings did not differ between the treatment of PRP + HA and PRP alone, while a discernible enhancement in treatment efficacy was observed when compared to HA monotherapy: the visual analog scale scores at 1- (mean difference[MD], -1.00; 95% CI: -1.37 - -0.62; P < .001), 6- (MD, -1.87; 95% CI: -3.46 - -0.28; P = .02), 12-months (MD, -2.07; 95% CI: -3.77 - -0.38; P = .02), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index total scores at 12-months (MD, -8.82; 95% CI: -14.48 - -3.16; P = .002). The incidence of adverse events was notably lower with PRP + HA than with HA alone (OR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19 - 0.69; P = .00) or PRP alone (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30 - 0.87; P = .01). PRP + HA therapy resulted in more pronounced pain and functional improvement in symptomatic KOA patients than HA treatments, and combination therapy may have higher clinical safety than PRP or HA monotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Melasma: A Systematic Review.

Melasma is a prevalent dermatological challenge with limited therapeutic interventions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been increasingly explored for its potential benefits in various dermatological conditions. This study aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of PRP in the treatment of melasma. A comprehensive search in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was executed in January 2024 using PubMed, focusing on studies investigating the efficacy and safety of PRP in melasma. Criteria for inclusion were clinical trials and controlled studies examining PRP's role in melasma treatment, while exclusions covered reviews, non-English articles, and studies older than 10 years, among others. Eight studies were included, with the majority targeting female participants. The research displayed consistent positive outcomes, whether PRP was used alone or synergistically with treatments like hydroquinone and tranexamic acid. However, positive studies with the combination of PRP and other drugs will not provide the actual safety and efficacy data of PRP. The combined treatment approaches often showed enhanced results. Satisfaction rates among patients and reductions in the melasma area and severity index (MASI) scores were common findings across the studies, emphasizing the potential of PRP in melasma management. In conclusion, PRP emerges as a promising therapeutic intervention for melasma. Whether as a standalone treatment or combined with established methods, PRP presents significant potential in melasma's clinical management, warranting further expansive trials to substantiate its long-term efficacy and safety.

Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Bronchopleural Fistula: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Study

IntroductionBronchopleural fistula (BPF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in patients undergoing pulmonary resections. Surgery, bronchoscopy, and conservative management have their limitations for small fistulas. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has regenerative properties, which might be efficient in enhancing tissue recovery and repairing small BPF. This study aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of PRP on BPF. MethodsThis is a pilot prospective cohort study. Patients whose fistulas smaller than 4mm were enrolled in this study, treated with PRP under bronchoscopy and followed up at 2 weeks and 4–6 weeks after the last PRP treatment. The cure rate, improvement rate and ineffectiveness rate were investigated. The severity of respiratory symptoms was evaluated by modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). The recurrence of fistula, new infection and mortality rate were examined. Adverse events were documented to explore the safety profile of PRP therapy. ResultsA total of 16 patients (mean age, 50.1 years) met the eligibility criteria. The median time from the first PRP treatment to the closure of the fistula was 12.0 (IQR 6.0, 21.5) days. Our findings indicate an effectiveness rate of 87.6%, with 68.8% of cure and 18.8% of improvement, along with significant improvement of respiratory symptoms evaluated by mMRC (P<0.001) and CAT (P<0.001). No recurrent of fistulas, newly developed infection, or death was observed. Adverse events of the procedure were most mild (82.6%) and temporary. ConclusionsPRP is a potential treatment for small BPF and is well tolerated.

Clinical evaluation of platelet-rich plasma therapy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We comprehensively searched randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, WanFang, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database from inception until October 25, 2024. The literature on the clinical efficacy of autologous PRP for ONFH was collated. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was screened, quality evaluated and the data was extracted. Meta-analysis was carried out with the software Review Manager 5.4.1 software and Stata 17.0 software. In addition, potential publication bias was detected by the funnel plot test and Egger's test. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcome indicators. Fourteen studies involving 909 patients were included in this study. Compared with non-PRP, PRP exhibited significant improvements in the Harris hip score (HHS) at 3 months (MD = 3.58, 95% Cl: 1.59 to 5.58, P = 0.0004), 6 months (MD = 6.19, 95% Cl: 3.96 to 8.41, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = 4.73, 95% Cl: 3.24 to 6.22, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = 6.83, 95% Cl: 2.09 to 11.59, P = 0.0003), and the last follow-up (MD = 6.57, 95% Cl: 4.81 to 8.33, P < 0.00001). The PRP also showed improvement in HHS compared to baseline than the non-PRP at 3 months (MD = 3.60, 95% Cl: 1.26 to 5.94, P = 0.003), 6 months (MD = 6.17, 95% Cl: 3.74 to 8.61, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = 5.35, 95% Cl: 3.44 to 7.25, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = 8.19, 95% Cl: 3.76 to 12.62, P = 0.0003), and the last follow-up (MD = 6.94, 95% Cl: 5.09 to 8.78, P < 0.00001). The change in visual analog scale (VAS) score 3 months post intervention (MD = -0.33, 95% Cl: -0.52 to -0.13, P = 0.001), 6 months (MD = -0.69, 95% Cl: -0.90 to -0.48, P < 0.00001), 12 months (MD = -0.75, 95% Cl: -1.05 to -0.46, P < 0.00001), ≥ 24 months (MD = -1.05, 95% Cl: -1.20 to -0.89, P < 0.00001), and the last follow-up (MD = -0.75, 95% Cl: -0.97 to -0.54, P < 0.00001). The PRP also showed a decrease in VAS score compared to baseline than the non-PRP at 3 months (MD = -0.29, 95% Cl: -0.41 to -0.17, P = 0.003), 6 months (MD = -0.63, 95% Cl: -0.96 to -0.30, P = 0.0002), 12 months (MD = -0.78, 95% Cl: -1.22 to -0.33, P = 0.0006), ≥ 24 months (MD = -1.11, 95% Cl: -1.27 to -0.96, P < 0.00001), and the last follow-up (MD = -0.74, 95% Cl: -1.05 to -0.43, P < 0.00001). Additionally, it was found that the PRP group had the advantages in the following aspects: collapse rate of the femoral head (RR = 0.33, 95% Cl: 0.17 to 0.62, P = 0.0006), rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (RR = 0.37, 95% Cl: 0.18 to 0.74, P = 0.005), and overall complications (RR = 0.33, 95% Cl: 0.13 to 0.83, P = 0.02). The GRADE evidence evaluation showed overall complication as very low quality and other indicators as low quality. There is limited evidence showing benefit of PRP therapy for treatment of ONFH patients, and most of this evidence is of low quality. Caution should therefore be exercised in interpreting these results. It is recommended that future research involve a greater number of high-quality studies to validate the aforementioned conclusions. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ #recordDetails, CRD42023463031.

A Prospective Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft versus Platelet-rich Plasma with Temporalis Fascia Graft in the Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforations

Aim: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an adjuvant for tympanoplasty for perforations of the tympanic membrane with temporalis fascia versus tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia only. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients diagnosed with chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type were divided into groups of 50 each. Patients in group one underwent tympanoplasty with PRP, while those in the second group underwent tympanoplasty without PRP. Pre- and postoperative graft status and pure-tone audiometry were performed for all the patients, and the outcomes were compared. Results: Graft uptake in the case group was 90% and while in the control group was 84%. The result was better in cases that underwent tympanoplasty with PRP. The improvement in the A-B gap was significantly more in the case group as compared to that of the control group. Conclusion: Temporalis fascia graft alone and along with PRP, both techniques has excellent results. The use of PRP along with temporalis fascia in cases of large central perforation gives an additional benefit in respect to healing time and audiological gain.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma for acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a prospective cohort study.

As the most common acute optic neuropathy in older patients, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) presents with varying degrees of visual acuity loss and visual field defect. However, there is no generally accepted treatment for NAION. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for patients with acute NAION within 2 months. A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial. Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients were enrolled. Of them, 13 received anisodine hydrobromide and butylphthalide-sodium chloride injection continuously for 10 days as basic treatment in the control group, and 12 received two tenon capsule injections of PRP on a 10 days interval as an additional treatment in the PRP group. We compared the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and capillary perfusion density (CPD) of radial peripapillary capillaries and the moth-eaten eara of the peripapillary superficial capillary plexus and deep capillary plexus at 1 day (D1) before the first PRP treatment and 7 days (D7), 14 days (D14), and 30 days (D30) after the first PRP injection. Ocular and systemic adverse effects were assessed. In the PRP group, a better BCVA occurred at D30 (adjusted p = 0.005, compared with D1, recovered from 0.67 ± 0.59 to 0.43 ± 0.59), and a significant improvement in CPD was observed at D30 (adjusted p < 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.027, compared with D1, D7, D14, in sequence, the value was 35.97 ± 4.65, 38.73 ± 4.61, 39.05 ± 5.26, 42.71 ± 4.72, respectively). CPD at D7 in the PRP group was better than that in the control group (p = 0.043). However, neither BCVA nor the moth-eaten area index were significantly different (all p > 0.5) between the two groups. The main adverse effect was local discomfort resolved within 1 week, and no other systemic adverse events occurred. Tenon capsule injection of PRP was a safe treatment for AION and could improve capillary perfusion of the optic nerve head and might be helpful in increasing short-term vision in patients with acute NAION.

INTRA-ARTICULAR PLATELET RICH PLASMA IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of knee is the most common worldwide degenerative joint disease and is a common condition associated with pain and morbidity which significantly impacts the patients mobility and quality of life. It is treated by use of exercises, weight reduction, walking supports, bracing, topical and oral NSAID, intra-articular (IA) injections of corticosteroids and blood-derived products, including platelet-rich-plasma. An autologous blood product containing a high percentage of various growth factors (GFs), cytokines and modulating factors as PRP has shown promising results in achieving this goal. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injections in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (KOA) of grades from 1 to 3 Kellgren‑Lawrence (KL) grading. Materials and Methods: In this study a total of 30 patients, radiologically confirmed with knee osteoarthritis. All patients were managed with intra-articular platelet rich plasma injection. The pain and function of the target knee were evaluated by the VAS, KSS and IKDC scales at the baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks after treatment. Results: In this study, there was reduction of 5 ± 0.4 and 4 in mean VAS from baseline was found after 24 and 48 weeks after treatment. A significant function improvements of 32.10±1.5 and 21.4±4.9 in mean KSS from baseline was seen after 24 and 48 weeks respectively after treatment. Similarly a significant function improvements of 47.1±3.9 and 32.1±4.6 in mean IKDC from baseline was seen after 24 and 48 weeks respectively after treatment. Conclusion: Intra articular platelet rich plasma produce superior outcomes for symptomatic management in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis grade I, II and III, including improved pain management, less joint stiffness and better participation in daily activity.

Slow-sculpting graphene oxide/alginate gel loaded with platelet-rich plasma to promote wound healing in rats.

Wounds, especially chronic wounds, have become an important problem that endangers human health. At present, there are many repair methods, and among them combines materials science and biology is one of the important repair methods. This study explored the preparation method, physicochemical properties, biological activity and safety of Platelet-Rich plasma (PRP)-loaded slow-sculpting graphene oxide (GO)/alginate gel, and applied it to acute full-thickness skin defect wounds in rats to observe its role in wound healing. The results show that the slow-sculpting GO/alginate gel has excellent plasticity and is suitable for a variety of irregularly shaped wounds. At the same time, its porous structure and water content can maintain the activity of platelets and their released growth factors in PRP, thereby promoting wound collagen synthesis and angiogenesis to accelerate wound healing. This indicates that the slow-sculpting GO/alginate gel is an excellent loading material for PRP, and the combination of the two may become one of the methods to promote wound repair.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of venous ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Considering the substantial impact of venous ulcers on quality of life and healthcare systems, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in comparison to conventional therapy. A systematic review of four databases identified 16 randomized clinical trials, including 20 study groups. PRP significantly enhanced complete ulcer healing, exhibiting an odds ratio (OR) of 5.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-10.89), and increased the percentage of healed ulcer area by a mean difference of 47% (95% CI: 32%-62%). Additionally, PRP shortened the time required for complete healing by an average of 3.25 months (95% CI: -4.06 to -2.43). Although pain reduction was similar in both groups, PRP considerably decreased ulcer recurrence rates (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.50) without increasing the risks of infection or irritative dermatitis. These results suggest PRP as a viable, safe alternative for venous ulcer treatment, providing significant improvements in healing outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Pressure ulcers are common chronic wounds in clinical practice, severely affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial economic burdens. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been explored for its potential in treating pressure ulcers. Herein, a study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in comparison to conventional treatments for pressure ulcers. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published from the inception to May 20, 2023, with only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PRP on the healing of pressure ulcers included. The outcomes of interest included healing rates, ulcer area, ulcer volume, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score, healing time, and complications. Finally, 9 RCTs, involving 511 patients with 523 pressure ulcers, met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in the healing rate, as evidenced by a weighted odds ratio (OR) of 3.40 (95% CI = 1.87 to 6.21, I2 = 32%, P < 0.0001). Additionally, the standard mean difference (SMD) for healed ulcer area favored the PRP group, reflecting an improvement of 1.38 cm2 (P = 0.02). Furthermore, the reduction in PUSH scores within the PRP group outperformed that observed in the control group, demonstrating a SMD of 1.69 (P = 0.01). Nevertheless, complications and the SMD for ulcer volume reduction revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups. From these findings, PRP stands out as a promising and safe therapeutic approach for pressure ulcers. For a deeper understanding of PRP's role in pressure ulcer healing, it is crucial to conduct more well-structured, high-quality RCTs in upcoming studies.