Safety Of Novel Oral Anticoagulants In Patients Research Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.

In recent times, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs)/direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative to the traditionally used VitaminK oral antagonists (VKA)like warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims toevaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF and, thus, the related thromboembolic risks and sequelae. Of the 131 published articles we examined, 11 were included in an in-depth systematic review. The articles we reviewed were from the past ten years, from 2013 onward. The analysis derived the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF and also included different patients' baseline characteristics and subgroups. This systematic review reiterates previous research findings of superior efficacy and safety of the use of NOACs in the AF population and also illuminates certain head-to-head comparisons of individual NOACs with warfarin.It digressed into subgroups of patients with different baseline characteristics to provide evidence and support the existing guidelines for the use of NOACs in the treatment of AF. Overall, there is marked efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF, be they elderly or Asian, with decreased renal function, or with other comorbidities. Adherence to NOACs was also satisfactory. Despite such a review, there needs to be more research on vast subgroups and also on reversal antidotes like andexanet alfa and idarucizumab, as well as more head-to-head analysis between NOACs over a long duration of study, which would provide more answers and pinpoint reasons as to the differences that exist between demographics and subgroups in the usage of NOACs.

Abstract 12901: Novel Oral Anticoagulants Are Associated With Decreased Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Patients with cancer are at high risk for recurrent thromboembolic phenomenon. Use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in such patients is controversial. We conducted this updated meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled efficacy and safety of NOAC in patients with cancer. Methods: We did systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing NOAC with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE treatment in cancer patients till April 2020. The efficacy outcomes were recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality rates, and the primary safety outcome was incidence of major bleeding rate. Results: Four randomized controlled studies comparing NOAC with LMWH (1446 patients in NOAC group and 1448 patients in LMWH group) were included in our study. Use of NOAC lead to significant reduction in recurrent VTE rate (odds ratio (OR): 0.55 [0.36-0.84], I 2 = 45 %, p value = 0.006) (Figure 1). However, we did not find any significant difference in rate of major bleeding (OR: 1.30 [0.76-2.23], I 2 = 35%, p value = 0.34) (Figure 2) and all-cause mortality (OR: 1 [0.80 - 1.26], I 2 = 33%, p value = 0.98). Conclusions: This updated meta-analysis showed comparatively lower pooled recurrent VTE rate in patient being treated with NOAC, whereas similar rates of major bleeding and all-cause death. NOAC are more efficacious and has similar safety profile compared with LMWH.

Novel oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease: ready for prime time?

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding posing unique clinical challenges. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have become recognized as alternative therapy to Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) regarding the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, the understanding of NOACs in CKD is still underdeveloped. This review summarizes recent literature on the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with CKD. Studies focusing on patients with moderate kidney disease were drawn from post hoc analyses from three major NOAC trials, meta-analyses, and postmarketing surveillance studies. Cumulatively, these studies continue to demonstrate NOACs as equivalent if not superior therapies to VKAs in regards to both efficacy and safety. These studies are limited by small sample sizes as well as a lack of direct comparison between NOACs. The role of NOACs in managing VTE and atrial fibrillation is increasing. Current research suggests that NOACs are at least as efficacious and well tolerated as VKAs. More research is required to elucidate which NOAC is preferable in the clinical setting.

Clinical Experience of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

<p>Patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation (AF) cardioversion were excluded from clinical trials of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs).</p><p>We evaluated efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for AF.</p><p>We performed a monocentric study of all patients on NOACs who underwent elective electrical cardioversion for non-valvular AF between January 2012 and December 2014. We analyzed incidence of stroke and bleeding at 30 days.</p><p>Fifty patients were included, 28 receiving dabigatran, 22 rivaroxaban. Mean age was 65 ± 12 years. Mean CHADS2-VA2SC and HASBLED scores were 3 ± 1.8 and 2.2 ± 1.1 respectively. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed in 41 (79%) patients, revealing a thrombus in 2 (5%). No clinical evidence of stroke occurred in the 30 days, 1 major gastrointestinal bleeding (2%) in patient on rivaroxaban (led to premature discontinuation) and 3 minor bleedings.</p><p>NOACs seem to be safe in daily practice of electrical cardioversion in our population.</p>

Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valves.

Prosthetic valve replacement is performed in several hundred thousand patients worldwide annually, and many of these patients have or will ultimately develop atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are not recommended in patients with AF and mechanical valves but have not been evaluated in patients with bioprosthetic valves. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves. A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed on all patients with bioprosthetic valve implantation, for whom a NOAC was prescribed for the indication of AF. Patients were evaluated for thromboembolic events including imaging confirmed ischemic stroke, clinically suspected transient ischemic attack, and major bleeding events (according to International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition). In total, 73 patients (26 female, 35.6 %) were identified. NOAC therapy began, on average, 990.0 ± 1029.1 days after bioprosthetic valve implantation for an average duration of 511.8 ± 400.8 days. Aspirin was used concomitantly in a majority of patients (72.6 %). There were no ischemic strokes identified (0.0 %) and one possible TIA (1.4 %). There were 6 (8.2 %) minor and 5 (6.9 %) major bleeding events. The use of NOAC therapy for AF in patients with bioprosthetic valves appears safe and effective in the occurrence of thromboembolic events, however, at the expense of increased bleeding. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these findings.