Safety Of Golimumab In Patients Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK).

The GO-BACK study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (GLM) treatment withdrawal in adults with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who demonstrate inactive disease during a 10-month open-label (OL) GLM run-in. Eligible participants received OL GLM in Period 1. In Period 2, participants who achieved inactive disease were randomized 1:1:1 to receive double-blind (DB) treatment with monthly placebo (PBO, treatment-withdrawal) or continued GLM treatment given monthly (GLM QMT) or every 2 months (GLM Q2MT). Participants who did not have a disease flare continued DB treatment for ∼12 months. Participants with a disease flare discontinued DB treatment and resumed monthly OL GLM. Primary end point compared the proportion of participants without a disease flare in the continued GLM treatment groups (QMT or Q2MT) versus PBO in a multiplicity-controlled, step-down fashion. Safety follow-up continued for ∼3 months after last treatment. A total of 188 patients, out of the 323 enrolled, were eligible for participation in Period 2. Both GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT were superior to treatment-withdrawal (PBO) in preventing disease flare (p< 0.001), with a treatment-difference vs PBO of 50.4% and 34.4% for the GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT groups, respectively. The time-to-first flare was significantly longer (log-rank p< 0.0001) with GLM treatment compared with PBO. Of 53 participants (in Q2MT or PBO) who had a confirmed disease flare, 51 (96.2%) attained a clinical response within 3 months of restarting OL GLM. Adverse events were consistent with the known GLM safety profile. Among participants with active nr-axSpA who attained inactive disease after 10 months of GLM treatment, continued GLM treatment is well tolerated and provides superior protection against disease flares compared with GLM withdrawal. (EudraCT: 2015-004020-65, registered on 30 March 2022; NCT: 03253796, registered on 18 August 2017).

P466 Real-world effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: 52-weeks of post-marketing surveillance data in Japan

Abstract Background Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-TNF-α drug approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Although its efficacy and safety were well established in clinical trials, real-world evidence was still limited. In the present study, we evaluated 52-week effectiveness and safety of GLM treatment for UC based on post-marketing surveillance data. Methods The prospective, post-marketing study was conducted in 393 patients from 163 medical facilities. Patients who had been prescribed GLM were enrolled between May 2017 and September 2019 in Japan. In accordance with Japanese indication, patients received subcutaneous injections of GLM, 200 mg at week 0, 100 mg at weeks 2 and 6, followed by 100 mg every 4 weeks. Clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2), predictors of remission, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and predictors of ADR development were determined at week 52. Results Of 393 enrolled patients, 391 and 386 were included in safety and efficacy analysis set, respectively (Table 1). Overall, clinical remission in the intention-to-treat population was 13.0%, 53.9%, 52.6%, 48.2%, and 43.3% at baseline (BL) and at week 6, 22, 36, and 52, respectively (Table 2). In biologic naïve group, clinical remission was 9.2%, 59.1%, 61.0%, 52.4%, and 47.0% at BL and week 6, 22, 36, and 52, respectively, while in biologic experienced group, it was 15.8%, 50.0%, 46.4%, 45.0%, and 40.5% at BL and week 6, 22, 36, and 52, respectively. At week 52, clinical remission rate in the patients who concomitantly used corticosteroid (CS) at BL was significantly lower than that in the patients who did not receive CS (p=0.017, 37.3% vs 49.2%) (Fig. 1). No significant difference in remission rate was observed between immunomodulator (IM) users and IM non-users at baseline. From multivariate analysis, concomitant use of CS (p=0.001, odds ratio [OR] =0.488, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.314–0.759) and partial Mayo remission at BL (p&amp;lt;0.001, OR=4.329, 95% CI 2.056–9.115) were identified as independent factors associated with clinical remission. ADRs occurred in 71 patients (18.2%). The most common ADR was rash, reported in 9 patients (2.3%). Serious ADRs occurred in 40 patients (10.2%). The most frequent serious ADR was UC, reported in 8 patients (2.0%). In multivariate analysis, the presence of comorbidities was associated with ADR incidence (OR=2.000, 95% CI 1.183–3.380). Conclusion From the Japanese post-marketing data, the real-world effectiveness of GLM treatment was confirmed in both biologic naïve and experienced populations. Safety profile was generally consistent with previous findings, and no additional safety signals were identified. Concomitant use of CS, but not IM, may be likely to affect outcome of GLM therapy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Golimumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Postmarketing Surveillance Study

Background/AimsGolimumab has been used for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) since 2013. However, there is limited data on the effectiveness and safety of the real-world use of golimumab in Asian patients.MethodsThis was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were administered subcutaneous golimumab at 46 medical centers between May 2014 and November 2019. The primary outcome was the effectiveness and safety of golimumab at week 22. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were assessed according to partial Mayo score at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22.ResultsA total of 130 patients were included (mean age 45.7±16.0 years). The clinical response/remission rates at weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 were 40.4%/22.9%, 56.0%/35.8%, 70.6%/49.5%, and 67.9%/48.6%, respectively. Based on full Mayo score at week 14, clinical response and remission rates were 84.2% and 39.5%, respectively. Mucosal healing rate was 65.8%. In multivariate analysis with logistic regression, longer disease duration was significantly associated with a higher clinical response rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.136; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006 to 1.282; p=0.040 at week 6; aOR, 1.256; 95% CI, 1.049 to 1.503; p=0.013 at week 22). A higher baseline Mayo endoscopic subscore was significantly associated with a lower clinical response rate at week 6 (aOR, 0.248; 95% CI, 0.089 to 0.692; p=0.008). The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 4.6% (6/130, nine events). No serious unexpected adverse drug reactions or deaths were reported.ConclusionsGolimumab was effective and safe as an induction and maintenance treatment for Korean patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Survival, efficacy and safety of Golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: data from an Argentine cohort

Objectives: golimumab is approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis. However, data from our region are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cumulative survival of golimumab in real-life patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpa) from different rheumatology centers in Argentina. Material and methods: we performed a longitudinal study of consecutive adults with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), PsA (CASPAR criteria) and axSpa (ASAS 2009 criteria), who have started treatment with golimumab according to medical indication. Data was obtained by review of medical records. Sociodemographic and clinical data, musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities and previous treatments were recorded. In reference to golimumab treatment, start date, route of administration and concomitant treatments were identified. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28 for RA patients, DAPSA and MDA for PsA and BASDAI for axSpa. The presence of adverse events was recorded. If golimumab was stopped, date and cause was documented. Patients were followed up until golimumab discontinuation, loss of follow-up, death, or study completion (November 30, 2020). Results: in total 182 patients were included, 116 with a diagnosis of RA, 30 with PsA and 36 with axSpa. Most of them (70.9%) were female with a median (m) age of 55 years (IQR 43.8- 64) and m disease duration of 7 years (IQR 4-12.7) at treatment initiation. Al least one prior biological (-b) and/or targeted synthetic (-ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was received by 63 patients (34.6%). Total follow-up was 318.1 patients/year. Golimumab treatment showed clinical improvement in all three groups of patients. The incidence of AE was 6.6 per 100 patients/year, being infections the most frequents ones. During follow-up, 50 patients (27.5%) discontinued golimumab, the most frequent cause was treatment failure (68%), followed by lack of health insurance (16%) and adverse events (10%). Golimumab persistence was 76% and 68% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Treatment survival was 50.2 months (95% CI 44.4-55.9). Patients who had received prior treatment with b- or ts-DMARDs showed lower survival (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.3-4.4). Conclusions: golimumab treatment in real life patients in Argentina has shown good efficacy and safety. Drug survival was over 4 years and almost 80% were still using golimumab after one year. Prior treatment with other b- or ts-DMARDs was associated with lower treatment survival.

Effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis under real-life clinical conditions: non-interventional GO-NICE study in Germany

ObjectiveThe Non Interventional Evaluation with Golumimab (GO-NICE) study aimed to document patient and treatment characteristics as well as clinical effectiveness and safety in adult patients newly treated with the tumour...

The Unfinished Symphony: Golimumab Therapy for Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Refractory Crohn's Disease.

Golimumab is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis. However, there have been no formal trials to assess its utility in Crohn's disease [CD]. Our aim was to determine the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] refractory CD. Patients with CD treated with golimumab between 2010 and 2017 were included in a retrospective observational study. The vast majority of patients failed two anti-TNF agents. Clinical response was defined as a significant reduction in symptoms and biochemical markers of CD, and no requirement for surgery or introduction of immune-suppressants. Forty-five patients were included, with a median follow-up of 22 months [interquartile range 12-34] following initiation of golimumab. Induction and maintenance regimens were generally higher than standard dosing with first month cumulative doses of 400 mg and above in 75% of the patients. Monthly maintenance doses ≥200 mg were administered in 52% of patients. Clinical response at 3 months was achieved in 35/45 [77.7%] patients. The cumulative probabilities that patients with an initial response maintained their clinical response for 12 and 36 months after introduction of golimumab were 81% and 64%, respectively. Endoscopic improvement and mucosal healing at 12 months was achieved in 73% and 47% of patients, respectively. This study demonstrates the efficacy of golimumab in anti-TNF refractory CD patients. Further studies should be performed in CD to formally assess the efficacy of golimumab in a randomized controlled trial and to establish the optimal dosing regimen.

The safety and efficacy of golimumab in treatment of 25 patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The subjects were randomized to receive either golimumab 50mg subcutaneously or placebo every 4 weeks. Patients in both groups received golimumab 50mg from week 24 to week 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of at least 20% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS20) at week 14. The secondary endpoints included at least 40% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS40), ASAS partial-remission, Bath AS functional index, Bath AS disease activity index, Bath AS metrology index, enthesitis index and Jenkins sleep evaluation questionnaire. Results: A total of 25 subjects were included in this study, 13 with golimumab and 12 with placebo. At Week 14, 6(46.2%) subjects achieved ASAS20 in golimumab group and 2(16.7%) in placebo group. Significant improvements of other efficacy endpoints were also found in golimumab group. Golimumab was safe and well to lerated. Most of the adverse events were slightly impaired liver function, where as elevated aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase returned to normal without drug with drawal. Conclusion: Golimumab improves AS activity, clinical symptoms and sleep disturbance in patients with active AS with good safety and tolerability.

P363. Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: a prospective multicentre study

P363. Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: a prospective multicentre study

Initial experience with golimumab in clinical practice for ulcerative colitis.

Golimumab is a TNF-blocking agent indicated as a second-line therapy in ulcerative colitis. To research the effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical practice. Retrospective study of the effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis. All patients received golimumab 200 mg subcutaneously at week 0, and golimumab 100 mg subcutaneously at week 2. After the induction treatment, each patient received 50 mg sc. every 4 weeks in patients with body weight less than 80 kg, and 100 mg every 4 weeks in patients with body weight greater than or equal to 80 kg. Study of a group of 23 ulcerative colitis patients, 7 of whom were naive to any anti-TNF therapy, and 16 patients who had previously been treated with an anti-TNF agent other than golimumab (non-naive patients). The average treatment time with golimumab was 14.3 weeks. Globally, withdrawal of corticosteroids was observed in 74% of cases. Clinical response was observed in 85.5% of patients who had not received biological treatment previously, and in patients who had previously received biological treatment the response rate was 75%. In this short study, golimumab seems to be an alternative treatment in naive and non-naive anti-TNF ulcerative colitis patients. It is also a safe therapy, given that there were no adverse effects in the patients studied.

AB0397 GO.A.RE.L. (Golimumab in Apulian Real-Life Patients) Study. Preliminary Data from Golimumab Therapy in Patients Affected with Polyarthritis. A Multicentre Experience in Apulia (Southern Italy)

BackgroundGolimumab has proven to be effective and safe in randomized clinical trials Go-Forward, Go-After, Go-Before and Go-More for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Go-Raise for Ankylosing Spondlylitis (AS), Go-Reveal for Psoriatic Arthritis...

AB0588 Golimumab in Refractory Uveitis to Other Anti-TNFα Drugs

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of Golimumab in patients with refractory uveitis to other anti-TNFα drugs.MethodsStudy of patients from a single center with refractory uveitis to previous standard synthetic...

Golimumab in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: Results Through 2 Years of the GO-FORWARD Study Extension

To assess the longterm efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. We randomized 444 RA patients with inadequate response to MTX (3:3:2:2) to placebo + MTX (Group 1), golimumab 100 mg + placebo (Group 2), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 3), or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 4). Subcutaneous golimumab/placebo was injected every 4 weeks. Patients could escape early (Group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, Group 2 added MTX, Group 3 increased golimumab to 100 mg, Group 4 continued 100 mg) based on Week 16 swollen and tender joint counts. From Week 24, Group 1 patients received golimumab 50 mg + MTX. After the Week 52 database lock, patients in the longterm extension received golimumab 50-100 mg ± MTX. Coprimary endpoints [Week 14 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, Week 24 Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] and Week 52 findings have been published; 2-year findings (observed data by randomized group, no imputation) are presented. Of 444 randomized patients, 392 continued from Week 52 (Group 1: n = 116, Group 2: n = 116, Group 3: n = 84, Group 4: n = 76). Clinical improvement was maintained through Week 104; ~75% and 72% of patients randomized to golimumab 50 mg + MTX and 100 mg + MTX achieved ACR20 response, respectively. The majority [88% (105/120)] of golimumab + MTX-treated patients with Week 24 HAQ-DI improvement ≥ 0.25 maintained improved physical function through Week 104. Group 1 patients with delayed golimumab treatment exhibited more Week 104 radiographic progression (mean change score = 1.15) than golimumab + MTX-randomized patients (0.52). Incidences of serious infections were 2.24, 4.77, 5.78/100 patient-years of followup for golimumab 50 mg + MTX, 100 mg + placebo, and 100 mg + MTX, respectively. Clinical improvement was maintained and no new safety signals were identified with 2 years of golimumab + MTX. Golimumab efficacy and safety, including serious infections, will continue to be monitored through 5 years (Clinical Trial No. NCT00264550).

Golimumab, a human antibody to tumour necrosis factor α given by monthly subcutaneous injections, in active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: the GO-FORWARD Study

Objective:The phase III GO-FORWARD study examined the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy.Methods:Patients were randomly assigned in a 3 : 3...

Golimumab, a new human tumor necrosis factor α antibody, administered every four weeks as a subcutaneous injection in psoriatic arthritis: Twenty‐four–week efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo‐controlled study

To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Adult patients with PsA who had at least 3 swollen and 3 tender joints and active psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 113), golimumab 50 mg (n = 146), or golimumab 100 mg (n = 146) every 4 weeks through week 20. Efficacy assessments through week 24 included the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in patients in whom at least 3% of the body surface area was affected by psoriasis at baseline, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), the physician's global assessment of psoriatic nail disease, and enthesitis (using the PsA-modified Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score [MASES] index). At week 14, 48% of all patients receiving golimumab, 51% of patients receiving golimumab 50 mg, and 45% of patients receiving golimumab 100 mg achieved an ACR20 response (the primary end point), compared with 9% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Among the 74% of patients in whom at least 3% of the body surface area was affected by psoriasis at baseline, 40% of those in the golimumab 50 mg group and 58% of those in the golimumab 100 mg group had at least 75% improvement in the PASI at week 14 (major secondary end point), compared with 3% of placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001 for both doses). Significant improvement was observed for other major secondary end points (the HAQ and the SF-36), the NAPSI, the physician's global assessment of psoriatric nail disease, and the PsA-modified MASES index in each golimumab group compared with placebo. This efficacy was maintained through week 24. Golimumab was generally well tolerated. Treatment with golimumab at doses of 50 mg and 100 mg significantly improved active PsA and associated skin and nail psoriasis through week 24.

Efficacy and Safety of Golimumab in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Golimumab in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial

Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trial

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the GO-RAISE study. Patients with active AS, a Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score > or =4, and a back pain score of > or =4 were randomly assigned in a 1.8:1.8:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous injections of golimumab (50 mg or 100 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least 20% improvement in the ASsessment in AS (ASAS20) criteria at week 14. At randomization, 138, 140, and 78 patients were assigned to the 50-mg, 100-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. After 14 weeks, 59.4%, 60.0%, and 21.8% of patients, respectively, were ASAS20 responders (P < 0.001). A 40% improvement in the ASAS criteria at week 24 occurred in 43.5%, 54.3%, and 15.4% of patients, respectively. Patients receiving golimumab also showed significant improvement in the physical and mental component summary scores of the Short Form 36 Health Survey, the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire score, the BASDAI score, and the Bath AS Functional Index score, but not the Bath AS Metrology Index score. Through week 24, 85.6% of golimumab-treated patients and 76.6% of patients in the placebo group had > or =1 adverse event, and 5.4% and 6.5% of patients, respectively, had > or =1 serious adverse event. Eight golimumab-treated patients and 1 placebo-treated patient had markedly abnormal liver enzyme values (> or =100% increase from baseline and a value >150 IU/liter), which were transient. Golimumab was effective and well tolerated in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24-week study period.